诺基亚 G42 5G 智能手机评测--这款引人注目的手机甚至可以更换电池
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Nokia G42 SD 480+, Adreno 619 | 194 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
| 79.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G53 SD 480+, Adreno 619 | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 79.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 202 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 81.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G SD 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619 | 189 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
外壳和功能 - 需要时非常醒目
当然，你可以选择诺基亚 G42 的 "So Grey "配色版本，这样你就可以得到一款设计相当经典的手机，圆角设计，塑料背壳也含有可回收材料，显示屏由大猩猩玻璃 3 保护。然而，只有选择了紫色的 "So Purple "版本，这款手机才会变得真正令人兴奋：这时，小颗粒会闪闪发光，光反射会在背面闪烁，相机模块的颜色也会与紫色设计相适应。
无论如何，这款 194 克重的手机拿在手上非常舒适，而且无法扭动。不过，你可以把后盖往中间按一点，压力也会传到屏幕的液晶上。诺基亚手机采用无塑料包装，并与 iFixit 合作提供https://store.ifixit.de/collections/nokia-parts相对便宜的替换零件，以及更换电池、屏幕或后盖的说明。这并不是什么巫术，但也不容易到外行都敢做的地步。
手机配备了 NFC 功能，因此可以顺利使用移动支付服务。还可以使用 FM 收音机，这在没有网络连接或不想耗费数据量时非常方便。不过，包装中并没有提供合适的耳机作为天线替代品。
诺基亚 G42 是一款双 SIM 卡手机，但其中一个 SIM 卡插槽也可用作 microSD 插槽，因此您必须决定使用哪个插槽。如果使用 microSD，那么在我们的测试中，该读卡器在与参考 microSD Angelbird V60 的复制测试中被证明有点慢，但在 CPDT 基准测试中再次取得了不错的成绩，因此总体速度适中是意料之中的。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G53 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Nokia G42 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 船上的现代移动通信
诺基亚 G42 是一款 5G 智能手机，因此您也可以使用最快的移动标准。这款手机提供足够的 LTE 和 5G 频率，可以在国外使用，但您应该事先确认是否可以在现场使用手机上网。在我们的测试阶段，接收强度处于较高水平。
WiFi 5 集成了最快的 WLAN 标准。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 路由器进行的测试中，诺基亚 G42 的传输速率非常稳定，在 317 - 380 Mbps 的标准范围内。虽然千兆线路无法充分利用，但对于快速加载和下载页面仍然足够。
Android 诺基亚 G42 ex-works 上安装了 13 个未作更改的界面，但制造商添加了一些第三方应用程序，例如来自购物门户网站的应用程序。这些应用可以顺利卸载。在测试时，安全更新是从 2023 年 6 月开始的，因此仍然相当及时。制造商承诺，自上市起，3 年内都会进行安全更新，直至 2026 年。操作系统也应该会有两个主要版本，因此手机也应该会收到 15。Android
触摸屏使用起来非常顺手，由于采用了 90 Hz 显示屏，操作看起来更加流畅。外壳右侧是待机键，同时也是指纹传感器。通过它可以对手机进行生物解锁。只需进行一次教导，就能非常可靠地进行解锁，但诺基亚 G42 在解锁屏幕之前偶尔会有短暂的延迟。人脸识别也可以使用。这种方法也能可靠地工作，但由于识别的是二维图像，因此不太安全。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
| Nokia G42 | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Nokia G42 | |
相机 - 照片清晰度高
背面有三个相机镜头。200 万像素的微距镜头主要用于抓拍，只能在相机软件的特殊模式下使用。深度摄像头只能为人像模糊效果提供额外信息，不能拍摄自己的照片。剩下的主摄像头像素为 5000 万，采用常见的三星 Isocell JN1 传感器。
诺基亚 5G 手机拍摄的照片清晰度不错，但你很快就会发现，雨天的动态范围很小。在更高质量的相机中，细节多样性也更高。在弱光环境下，亮部和暗部都会丢失很多细节，但照明区域的质量还不错。主摄像头在实验室中表现出色，边缘几乎没有锐度损失。
视频可以 1080p 格式录制，最高 30 fps。自动对焦工作迅速，没有抽风现象，亮度调节也相当不错。拍摄出来的影片清晰度不错，但光线要充足，否则会有很多噪点。
前置自拍摄像头采用 800 万像素传感器。在光线充足的情况下，照片效果相当不错。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
显示屏 - 低分辨率屏幕
遗憾的是，诺基亚 G42 只有 720p 屏幕，在亮度方面也被同价位的其他设备超越。排在前面的是 小米Redmi Note 12 5G，它甚至采用了 AMOLED 屏幕。
我们看到显示屏的偏蓝现象比较严重，导致色彩还原失真，照片看起来比较冷。此外，黑色值相当高，对比度也很一般。
至少，我们在低亮度时没有发现恼人的 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 495 cd/m²
Contrast: 990:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.325
| Nokia G42 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Motorola Moto G53 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G PLS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -41% | -12% | 96% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.5 ? | 56 ? -58% | 46.48 ? -31% | 1.35 ? 96% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.7 ? | 26.6 ? -23% | 20.21 ? 7% | 1 ? 95% |
| PWM Frequency | 343 | |||
| Screen | 32% | -10% | 53% | |
| Brightness middle | 495 | 587 19% | 579 17% | 658 33% |
| Brightness | 452 | 559 24% | 543 20% | 663 47% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 91 8% | 87 4% | 98 17% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.4 20% | 0.57 -14% | |
| Contrast | 990 | 1468 48% | 1016 3% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.09 | 2.6 57% | 7.6 -25% | 1.4 77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.35 | 5.62 40% | 12.7 -36% | 2.7 71% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 3.3 43% | 8.7 -50% | 1.7 71% |
| Gamma | 2.325 95% | 2.463 89% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 8169 80% | 6288 103% | 9344 70% | 6504 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
18% | -11% /
-11% | 75% /
63% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 电量充足
骁龙 480 Plus 5G 骁龙 480 Plus 5G骁龙 480 Plus 5G 是 2021 年的产品，虽然已经有些年头，但其性能仍然足以保证系统的流畅运行，而且还能胜任照片编辑等要求较高的任务。虽然诺基亚智能手机使用了高性能的 UFS 2.2 存储，但存储控制器无法充分利用存储可能达到的速度。因此，它的传输速率只能达到同级水平，在数据传输和加载过程中偶尔会出现等待时间。
在较长时间的负载情况下，手机会明显发热，最高温度可达 43.1 °C，但温度上升并不严重。长期测试也证明了这一点，同样的基准测试运行 20 次后，手机的性能与之相差无几。
诺基亚 G42 底部边缘的扬声器在音质方面并不出众，整体听起来有点闷。再次按下音量增大键可以激活 "音频增强 "功能，此时声音会变得更加清晰，但高音也会非常重，甚至有点大。如果您喜欢连接耳机或扬声器，可以找到一个插孔和蓝牙 5.1 接口。在无线音频传输编解码方面，有最重要的标准可供选择：SBC、AAC、LDAC 和一些 aptX 编解码器。
在我们的 WLAN 测试中，诺基亚 G42 5G 的 5,000 毫安时电池可支持 15:33 小时的正常运行。这个价位的手机续航时间要长得多，但这款手机在日常使用中的表现一般都不错，通常可以陪伴你度过一天而无需停止充电。
诺基亚 G42 5G 的充电功率可达 20 瓦，但包装内没有充电器。在电池完全耗尽的情况下，电池电量指示灯恢复到 100%需要 2 个多小时。
| Nokia G42 | Motorola Moto G53 | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -18% | 27% | 2% | 21% | 156% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 492.5 | 474.6 -4% | 849.3 72% | 520.09 6% | 728 ? 48% | 1839 ? 273% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 461.8 | 243.87 -47% | 469.83 2% | 505.55 9% | 527 ? 14% | 1425 ? 209% |
| Random Read 4KB | 183.3 | 166.24 -9% | 193.63 6% | 170.61 -7% | 191.7 ? 5% | 277 ? 51% |
| Random Write 4KB | 161.1 | 139.83 -13% | 204 27% | 161.26 0% | 185.8 ? 15% | 309 ? 92% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Nokia G42 | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
| Nokia G42 | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
发言人
Nokia G42 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia G42 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G | |
Pros
Cons
结论--需要权衡利弊
诺基亚 G42 确实有一些特别之处：除了大胆的颜色选择之外，该机对于修理工来说相对容易维修，采用了部分可回收材料，而且尽管价格低廉，制造商仍承诺提供更新服务。遗憾的是，诺基亚 G42 目前还不能作为循环套餐的一部分从诺基亚租用。
诺基亚 G42 的处理器速度够快，屏幕足以满足日常使用需求，相机也能拍出不错的照片。不过，诺基亚 G42 5G 在这些方面都无法在同类手机中脱颖而出。电池续航时间和无线局域网速度也是平庸而非领先。
对于日常使用来说，诺基亚 G42 是一款廉价而可靠的伴侣，它应该可以长期更新，而且由于其相对容易维修，还可以持续使用。
在功能方面更有亮点的是 小米Redmi Note 12 5G配备 AMOLED 显示屏，但可持续发展方面的优势在这里往往要退居其次。另一款同价位的快速移动通信手机是 三星Galaxy A14 5G.
价格和供应情况
在美国，用户可以通过亚马逊订购这款手机，价格约为 335 美元。
Nokia G42
- 08/09/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
