Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A14 5G评测--低价位的入门级智能手机的升级版

一个慷慨的升级。

Galaxy A14 5G今年以其高分辨率的显示屏和快速的内存而大热。在其他方面,这款三星手机还有改进的余地。在这篇评论中,你可以了解到是什么让这款智能手机仍然值得购买。
5G Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)

三星Galaxy A14 5G是一款入门级的智能手机,直接继承了Galaxy A13 5G.它有两个存储版本:64GB和128GB。64GB的版本价格为199.99美元--比它的前辈多出10美元左右。

在审查A13 5G时,我们批评了其缓慢的内存,缺乏广角镜头和低分辨率。它的充电时间、扬声器和它的定位精度也不合格。随着三星Galaxy A14 5G的发布,许多这些问题都得到了改善。毕竟,这款智能手机是韩国制造商最畅销的产品之一,而且是带LTE的版本。带有LTE的版本实际上是去年世界上销售量第四大的手机(我们报道).

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Galaxy A10 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 700 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, Capacitive, 10 multi touch points, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, PLS LCD, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB 
, 64GB / 128GB, 45.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900), 3G (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.1 x 167.7 x 78
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8) + 2 MPix (Depth, f/2.4) + 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: OnScreen, SIM-Tool, USB cable, One UI 5.0, 24 Months Warranty, Dual-Nano-SIM, DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1), SBAS, fanless
Weight
202 g
Price
229 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
79.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
202 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
78.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Telekom T Phone
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.52"1600x720
81.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Xiaomi Poco X5
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
78.5 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Honor X8
SD 680, Adreno 610
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2388x1080
80.2 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2021
Nokia X10
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

三星Galaxy A14 5G有黑色、银色和绿色,前者是我们的测试设备。它的设计让人想起了它的前辈--尽管这一次,三星没有采用塑料一体式机身。现在,它的设计更接近于它的大姐姐,即Galaxy A34,或者说是A54.然而,它的边框和后壳继续由塑料制成--而三星没有给出关于正面使用何种类型玻璃的进一步细节。

这款手机背壳上的凹槽给人以不同寻常的感觉,让你对手机的抓握感稍好。如果你用指甲拖过它,会发出相当恼人的噪音。指纹在表面上仍然有些明显。显示屏与表面的比例还可以--不过,它确实感觉有点过时了。屏幕周围的塑料框架也可以说是如此。虽然,它做得很好:除了卡槽与手机边框相接处有一点缝隙外,一切都排得很整齐。试图弯曲边框并不会导致任何噼里啪啦的声音--为了使液晶屏上出现一个微妙的波浪形图案,你确实必须相当用力地按。这款智能手机的重量为202克,有点偏重。

A14 5G没有任何特殊的防尘或防水保护,电池被内置在外壳中。在可持续性方面,三星本可以更努力一些--该设备的框架被塑料包裹着,然后整个手机被另一张透明塑料包裹着。

(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
(照片: Daniel Schmidt)

尺寸比较

169 mm 79.7 mm 9.1 mm 220 g167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 202 g166.6 mm 76.4 mm 8.7 mm 195 g165.88 mm 76.21 mm 7.98 mm 190 g164.5 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 195 g163.4 mm 74.7 mm 7.45 mm 177 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 -Galaxy A14 5G有一个快速的microSD插槽

关于这款手机的连接选项,三星自其前代产品以来没有太大变化。它的USB 2.0端口是这个价格范围内的预期,它支持OTG,这意味着可以连接外围设备或存储设备。在我们的测试中,它的平均传输速率为31.62MB/s。

此外,这款智能手机具有蓝牙5.2、NFC和音频插孔。另一个积极因素是,三星继续使用双卡解决方案,并为微型SD卡提供额外空间。

上图:麦克风(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
上图:麦克风(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
左图:卡槽(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
左图:卡槽(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
右图:音量,集成指纹传感器的按钮(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
右图:音量,集成指纹传感器的按钮(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、音频(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、音频(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。

微型SD卡读卡器

在我们的测试中,Galaxy A13 5G的microSD卡插槽不幸地仍然是较慢的型号之一。三星已经在Galaxy A14 5G中解决了这个问题--在这里,其速度快了两倍半,并提供了良好的传输速率。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50.48 MB/s
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
27.13 MB/s -46%
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
17.68 MB/s -65%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
16.1 MB/s -68%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
14.3 MB/s -72%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (22.3-48.4)
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø17.9 (0.984-45.4)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.7 (20.1-83.4)
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.3 (50.1-77.6)

软件--三星智能手机的2+4年更新

三星Galaxy A14 5G预装了谷歌Android 13和One UI 5.0,在我们的测试过程中已经收到了更新到当前版本(5.1)。三星已经承诺再进行两次大型系统更新--意味着达到Android 15--以及再进行两年的安全补丁(从发布之日起)。

与其他更强大的智能手机相比,助手Bixby已经不在船上了。相比之下,Galaxy Store和一些更多的三星应用被预装了。来自微软、Meta、Netflix和Spotify的第三方应用程序也随手机附送--但是,除了OneDrive之外--如果你不需要它们,你能够将它们全部卸载。微软的云服务只能停用,不能卸载。

通信和GNSS - 5G、Wi-Fi 5和体面的位置跟踪

三星Galaxy A14 5G支持--顾名思义--目前所有的移动通信标准,包括5G-Sub6。它的频率覆盖面很广,这意味着你在国外连接互联网应该不会有任何问题。在我们的测试中,它在大城市的接收性能并没有标出任何问题。

WLAN接收器支持Wi-Fi 5,这意味着它可以使用2.4以及5.0GHz网络。与我们的参考路由器,华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000一起,该设备提供了可接受的数据传输率,并在任何时候都保持稳定。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)
714 MBit/s +93%
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
371 (364min - 371max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
369 (361min - 371max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
344 (173min - 351max) MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 (289min - 349max) MBit/s -9%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
247 (47min - 312max) MBit/s -33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)
729 MBit/s +98%
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
374 (187min - 385max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
369 (337min - 380max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
368 (355min - 384max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
364 (183min - 386max) MBit/s -1%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
303 (108min - 372max) MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
323 (289min - 329max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
332 (318min - 336max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø366 (361-371)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø338 (173-351)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (337-380)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (183-386)
GPS测试:在一个建筑物内
楼内
GPS测试:室外
外界

尽管三星Galaxy A14 5G只使用单频-GNSS进行位置追踪,但它的位置可以迅速确定--即使是在建筑物中。

在一次自行车旅行中,这款手机可以与Garmin Venu 2.沿着十公里长的路线,偏差很小。环湖一圈的追踪也相当准确--在房屋之间,智能手机有点不准确,但对于导航任务来说,这仍然完全足够。

GNSS测试路线:绕过一个湖
GNSS测试路线:绕过一个湖
GNSS测试路线:转折点
GNSS测试路线:转折点
GNSS测试路线:摘要
GNSS测试路线:摘要

电话功能和通话质量

Galaxy A14 5G支持VoLTE和WLAN通话等基本功能,但是,系统集成的SIP账户管理却没有出现。

当你把智能手机放在耳边时,通话质量还不错--有时,会有一点背景噪音。它的噪音抑制功能能够抑制较安静的噪音干扰,但在较大声的设置中,这一功能很快就会达到极限。在扬声器模式下,声音有一点回声,声音有时有点空洞。

摄像机--Galaxy A14 5G上的50MPix。

在Galaxy A14 5G上自拍(纵向模式)。
在Galaxy A14 5G上自拍(纵向模式)。

Galaxy A14 5G的前置摄像头得到了升级,现在的分辨率为1300万像素。A13 5G有500万像素。使用该相机拍摄的照片看起来很轻,光线充足--但尽管分辨率较高,一些细节仍然缺乏。人像模式的虚化效果很吸引人,然而,前景和背景之间的边界有点刺眼。

同样,该设备背面的主摄像头有三个镜头,与前代产品的镜头基本相同。它能以4:3、16:9、1:1和全格式(20.1:9)拍摄照片。这款相机仍然没有超广角镜头,两个额外的镜头并没有真正为该设备带来任何价值。5千万像素的传感器提供了体面的照片,构图均衡。有时,像素分层技术并不能很好地保留照片中的所有细节--在低光下,图片质量有些令人失望。该相机没有光学图像稳定功能,图像放大仅限于10倍数字变焦,这也带来了糟糕的结果。

在两边,视频可以以最高质量的全高清和30帧的速度录制。不幸的是,没有视频防抖选项。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow light

在受控的照明条件下,Galaxy A14 5G在画面中间非常准确地显示了我们的测试图表--向角落,在最大分辨率下可以看到一些像差。

它的色彩再现还算不错--深绿色有时显得有点太浅,而橙色和青色有时有点暗。

ColorChecker
4.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A14 5G: 7.32 ∆E min: 1 - max: 12.63 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
64 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
75.3 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
85.5 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A14 5G: 46.27 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 85.46 ∆E

附件和保修 - 小范围交货

Galaxy A14 5G只包括绝对必要的东西。(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
Galaxy A14 5G只包括绝对必要的东西。(照片: Daniel Schmidt)

三星Galaxy A14 5G只配备了一条USB-C电缆以及一个打开卡槽的小工具。电源适配器需要单独购买。

这款手机有24个月的保修期,可以用三星Care+延长。这是一个为期一年或两年的保险包,也可以选择覆盖盗窃。费用在26美元到64美元之间,取决于长度和所包含的内容--它还限于每年最多涵盖两次索赔。如果出现这种情况,你还必须支付约27美元的超额费用(在盗窃的情况下约54美元)。

输入设备和操作 - A14 5G,电源按钮中内置指纹扫描仪

这款手机的电容式触摸屏一次可识别多达10个输入,并具有良好的滑动特性。触摸输入是精确实现的。

出于生物识别安全的目的,电源按钮上安装了一个指纹扫描仪。这工作相当可靠,但不一定是最快的。另外,你可以通过前置摄像头设置人脸扫描,这不太安全,而且在昏暗的光线条件下不是很可靠。

与更昂贵的三星智能手机相比,这款手机的电源按钮没有预装Bixby,相反,它只有一个普通的关机菜单。在手机的设置中,你可以启用双击功能。它的振动很强,但有点模糊。

显示 - 光90赫兹PLS面板

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Galaxy A14 5G的显示屏比前代产品更大,现在的对角线尺寸为6.6英寸(16.76厘米),分辨率为2,408 x 1,080像素,刷新率为60或90 Hz。不支持HDR。

然而,考虑到该显示器的亮度,这并不令人惊讶,在启用环境光传感器的情况下,其最高亮度为573cd/m²,在APL18测量中也处于类似水平(568cd/m²)或使用手动控制(579cd/m²)。

它的黑值略高,但这被PLS面板体面的亮度所补偿,所以对比度仍然很清晰。

501
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
563
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 579 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 543 cd/m² Minimum: 7.78 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 579 cd/m²
Contrast: 1016:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
PLS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Telekom T Phone
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Xiaomi Poco X5
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Honor X8
TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.7"
Nokia X10
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
PLS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Screen
9%
44%
7%
16%
18%
Brightness middle
579
419
-28%
674
16%
510
-12%
674
16%
471
-19%
Brightness
543
391
-28%
683
26%
469
-14%
630
16%
437
-20%
Brightness Distribution
87
89
2%
98
13%
78
-10%
83
-5%
86
-1%
Black Level *
0.57
0.29
49%
0.82
-44%
0.78
-37%
0.31
46%
Contrast
1016
1445
42%
622
-39%
864
-15%
1519
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.6
6.1
20%
1.6
79%
2.5
67%
3.39
55%
5.43
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.7
11.9
6%
5.3
58%
5.8
54%
6.95
45%
10.55
17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.7
7.8
10%
2.5
71%
4.1
53%
4.4
49%
5.1
41%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2.21 100%
2.45 90%
2.175 101%
2.12 104%
CCT
9344 70%
8208 79%
6346 102%
6307 103%
8301 78%
7465 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

三星没有提供任何选项来控制该设备的液晶屏上的色彩表现。Galaxy A14 5G的显示屏被校准为相当冷,它将其颜色描绘得非常饱和。这在日常使用中不应该是一个问题,但不可能自然地显示颜色。

灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.638 ms rise
↘ 14.57 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.16 ms rise
↘ 26.32 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在户外,Galaxy A14 5G以其良好的可读性给人留下深刻印象--尽管在晴天,这只有在阴凉处才能真正实现。它的环境光传感器需要一两分钟来调整屏幕亮度。

PLS显示屏的视角稳定性很好,即使在平视角度也没有色彩反转的问题,但其亮度肯定会受到明显的影响。在我们的测试设备上没有光晕,然而,我们在夜间观察到轻微的发光效果。

三星Galaxy A14 5G的可视角度稳定性
三星Galaxy A14 5G的可视角度稳定性

性能 - 联发科Dimensity 700,4GB内存

去年,三星依靠的是联发科Dimensity 700(MT6833V),他们也给Galaxy A14 5G 4GB内存。它的性能显然可以放在入门级的范围内,没有提供太多的呼吸空间。在我们的系统基准测试中,由于其现代内存,三星智能手机仍然取得了很大的飞跃。

在日常使用中,该设备仍然时不时地出现一些掉帧,这意味着其90赫兹的较高刷新率并不总是能够实现。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=171, last 2 years)
993 Points +89%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
674 Points +28%
Telekom T Phone
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
541 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (445 - 574, n=9)
531 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
525 Points
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
508 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
445 Points -15%
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
379 Points -28%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=171, last 2 years)
3309 Points +95%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1963 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1700 Points
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1687 Points -1%
Telekom T Phone
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1638 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1071 - 1775, n=9)
1601 Points -6%
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
1571 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1071 Points -37%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points +84%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
888 Points +30%
Telekom T Phone
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
692 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
683 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (664 - 692, n=3)
680 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points +84%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1918 Points +5%
Telekom T Phone
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1826 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1825 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1756 - 1826, n=3)
1802 Points -1%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points +159%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
398336 Points +29%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
324606 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
308581 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (243323 - 356312, n=5)
305947 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
243323 Points -21%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=189, last 2 years)
12976 Points +61%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10634 Points +32%
Telekom T Phone
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8139 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6492 - 10433, n=11)
8048 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8038 Points
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
7645 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6962 Points -13%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6928 Points -14%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=156, last 2 years)
882 Points +65%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
591 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
534 Points
Telekom T Phone
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
519 Points -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (371 - 534, n=5)
496 Points -7%
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
413 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
371 Points -31%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=150, last 2 years)
6288 Points +123%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3333 Points +18%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3228 Points +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2779 - 3107, n=8)
2926 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2825 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2794 Points -1%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=150, last 2 years)
10177 Points +85%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6958 Points +26%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6298 Points +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4888 - 6712, n=8)
5669 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5508 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4917 Points -11%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=150, last 2 years)
6745 Points +69%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3685 - 4473, n=8)
4100 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3991 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3824 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3623 Points -9%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3575 Points -10%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=150, last 2 years)
16876 Points +531%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3975 Points +49%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3843 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2676 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2398 - 2676, n=8)
2572 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2535 Points -5%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=150, last 2 years)
1561 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1279 Points +18%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1254 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1083 - 1353, n=8)
1237 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1232 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1083 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=142, last 2 years)
16706 Points +165%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4863 - 9243, n=5)
6899 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6303 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5785 Points -8%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=134, last 2 years)
26055 Points +2646%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (949 - 979, n=2)
964 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
949 Points

图形加速是由 ARM Mali-G57 MP2处理,它被集成到SoC中。主要的性能飞跃是不可预期的,在我们的基准测试中,该GPU被定位在预期的较低的入门级范围。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
315 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
310 Points
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
284 Points -8%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
124 Points -60%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 Points +1%
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
326 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
324 Points
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 Points -10%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
127 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1166 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1139 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1116 Points -2%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
978 Points -14%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
442 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1203 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1191 Points
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1191 Points 0%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
980 Points -18%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
456 Points -62%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3618 Points
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3561 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3392 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3179 Points -12%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3098 Points -14%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2571 Points -29%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2988 Points +27%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2441 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2347 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2331 Points -1%
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2324 Points -1%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1186 Points -49%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3069 Points +21%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2562 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2546 Points
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2518 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2478 Points -3%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1347 Points -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
65 fps +16%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +47%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
65 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
58 fps +115%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps +56%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +31%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
48 fps +129%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +43%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +42%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps +108%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +42%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +33%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps +115%
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
16 fps +103%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +52%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.9 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.9 fps
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4.6 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8 fps +51%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.5 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.6 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.3 fps
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5.2 fps -2%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3.2 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps +133%
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
24 fps +100%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +58%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.8 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +57%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13 fps -7%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.5 fps -32%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4 fps +74%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.4 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.3 fps
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2.2 fps -4%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1.4 fps -39%

事实证明,对三星Galaxy A14 5G来说,浏览网页是没有问题的,尽管有时在更复杂的网页上滚动会显得有些颠簸。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=160, last 2 years)
120.5 Points +146%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
68.36 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)
53.56 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
48.955 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 58.2, n=8)
45.6 Points -7%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
44.05 Points -10%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +296%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (chrome 113)
44.3 runs/min +29%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chome 106)
41.7 runs/min +21%
Nokia X10 (Chome 91)
38.06 runs/min +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (34.4 - 41.7, n=6)
37.4 runs/min +9%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
34.4 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=151, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +128%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
73 Points +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 59, n=4)
54.3 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)
52 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (2111)
50 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=202, last 2 years)
37036 Points +141%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
22881 Points +49%
Telekom T Phone (Chrome 111)
17157 Points +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15352 - 21843, n=9)
17130 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)
16871 Points +10%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
15636 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
15352 Points
Honor X8 (Chrome 103)
13141 Points -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
2699 ms * -15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2195 - 3387, n=8)
2693 ms * -15%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
2337.2 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)
2259.8 ms * +3%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
1860 ms * +20%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=159, last 2 years)
1574 ms * +33%

* ... smaller is better

在Galaxy A14 5G中,三星在这个系列中首次使用了快速的UFS 2.2存储,这明显有利于性能。读取和写入率都在一个持续的高水平上。即使是Galaxy A545G,它的价格是原来的两倍多,真的可以从这本书中吸取经验。

Samsung Galaxy A14 5GTelekom T PhoneHonor X8Nokia X10Samsung Galaxy A13 5GAverage 64 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-58%
3%
-21%
-60%
-14%
104%
Sequential Read 256KB
849.3
685.21
-19%
926.58
9%
498.6
-41%
289.7
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
469.83
94.15
-80%
510.25
9%
455
-3%
176.7
-62%
Random Read 4KB
193.63
80.62
-58%
189.38
-2%
170.6
-12%
86.2
-55%
156.6 ?(88.5 - 220, n=18)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
204
55.82
-73%
195.75
-4%
145.4
-29%
90.9
-55%
177.7 ?(95.4 - 216, n=18)
-13%

游戏--休闲游戏,帧数高达90帧

Galaxy A14 5G的ARM Mali-G57 MP2绝不是一个GPU巨兽。这就是为什么我对我们用Gamebench测得的帧率不是很高并不感到惊讶。测得的帧率不是很高。

在玩射击游戏《PUBG》时,你最多可以选择高清设置--即使如此,你也只能期待最高30帧的速度。如果你降低图形细节,你真的无法取得更好的结果。反过来,像《地铁冲浪者》这样的简单游戏也能非常流畅地以60帧运行。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
地铁冲浪者
地铁冲浪者
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.5.0: Ø39.7 (32-41)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.5.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.5.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G; Subway Surfers; 3.11.0: Ø88.4 (58-91)

排放 -Galaxy A14,配有薄型单声道扬声器

温度

三星Galaxy A14 5G的表面温度从未引起任何关注--这一点也反映在设备内部,因为SoC在我们所有的压力测试中都保持稳定。

Max. Load
 32.9 °C30.7 °C34.9 °C 
 32 °C31.7 °C29.3 °C 
 31.3 °C31.5 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 34.9 °C
Average: 31.6 °C
28.5 °C30.1 °C34.8 °C
28.8 °C29.2 °C34.4 °C
28.9 °C31.6 °C33.8 °C
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 31.1 °C
Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 %
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.2 % 0%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Telekom T Phone
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.1 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 %
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.9 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
97.7 % -1%
01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.978 (1.957-1.988)
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.956 (1.949-1.967)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.2 (7.18-7.21)
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.14 (7.12-7.16)

发言人

手机底部的单声道扬声器令人失望--与A13的情况一样。Galaxy A13低音几乎没有出现,中音太平淡,无法与不精确的高音抗衡。好在三星仍然集成了一个插孔插头,尽管它的信噪比为68.18dBFS,相当平庸。

另一方面,蓝牙5.2是无线的,它支持SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC和SSC等音频编解码器。少了一些现代编解码器,但从价格范围来看,这是可以接受的。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.635.6253031.23124.530.64025.833.25037.536.86325.232.88020.236.610020.436.312517.537.516014.439.920014.341.925015.247.431511.951.140013.55750012.165.563012.466.580011.770.1100011.874.5125011.477.2160012.376.1200012.276.7250012.178.1315012.280400012.979.3500013.478.5630013.281.6800012.9821000013.682.51250013.479.31600013.265SPL24.890.4N0.681.3median 12.9median 76.1Delta0.911.329.642.93043.824.537.725.840.837.543.325.240.320.247.520.445.917.547.814.450.814.351.215.251.811.956.913.561.612.166.112.466.311.77111.876.611.478.112.377.112.279.312.180.612.283.912.985.713.48413.282.512.979.613.678.913.476.913.265.324.8930.691.7median 12.9median 76.90.99.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A14 5GXiaomi Poco X5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco X5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--尽管是全高清,但运行时间很长

消耗功率

我们的功耗测量结果显示,其功耗高于前代产品,尤其是在空闲模式下使用全屏亮度--这是由于更高的像素数造成的。

充电只能使用电缆,而且最大功率为15瓦。因此,为5000毫安时的电池充电需要很长的时间。在我们的测试中,我们需要超过两个半小时才能充满电。57分钟后才达到50%的目标,97分钟后达到80%的目标,113分钟后达到90%的目标。这远远不是快速充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.64 / 2.1 / 2.17 Watt
Load midlight 3.73 / 5.44 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X5
5000 mAh
Nokia X10
4470 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
7%
-5%
9%
-13%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
0.96
-50%
0.8
-25%
1
-56%
0.841 ?(0.61 - 1.28, n=8)
-31%
Idle Average *
2.1
1.49
29%
1.7
19%
1.1
48%
Idle Maximum *
2.17
1.53
29%
1.9
12%
1.2
45%
2.26 ?(1.2 - 4.58, n=8)
-4%
Load Average *
3.73
3.52
6%
4.5
-21%
3.4
9%
4.39 ?(3.27 - 10.5, n=8)
-18%
Load Maximum *
5.44
4.32
21%
5.9
-8%
5.6
-3%
6.21 ?(5.3 - 11.2, n=8)
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.66 (0.961-4.95)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.03 (1.085-5.3)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.044 (0.961-1.409)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.183 (1.111-1.285)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.811.21.41.51.71.92.12.32.52.72.93.13.33.53.7Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.41 (2.26-2.81)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.13 (2.92-3.86)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.044 (0.961-1.409)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.183 (1.111-1.285)

运行时间

当你看它的运行时间时,这款手机由于更高的屏幕分辨率而增加的消耗也很明显--但没有我们预期的那么严重。Galaxy A14 5G仍然实现了非常好的运行时间,在比较领域只得承认败给了自己的前辈。

在日常使用中,两到三天的电池运行时间应该是可以实现的,而不需要将设备插入。A14在待机模式下也非常节俭,只在完全不使用时损失一点能量。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
42h 38min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 112)
17h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 31min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 40min
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
5000 mAh
Telekom T Phone
4500 mAh
Honor X8
4000 mAh
Nokia X10
4470 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-13%
-17%
-11%
6%
Reader / Idle
2558
2435
-5%
2799
9%
H.264
1111
977
-12%
1229
11%
WiFi v1.3
1029
894
-13%
858
-17%
896
-13%
1102
7%
Load
340
297
-13%
334
-2%

Pros

+ 无闪烁的90赫兹PLS面板
+ 双卡和microSD
+ 电池寿命长
+ 稳定的Wi-Fi 5和5G
+ 长时间的更新交付

Cons

- 平庸的扬声器
- 充电速度慢
- 三合一相机的附加镜头较弱

评语--廉价的三星智能手机做得很好

三星Galaxy A14 5G评论。测试设备由notebooksbilliger.de提供。(照片: Daniel Schmidt)
三星Galaxy A14 5G评论。测试设备由notebooksbilliger.de提供。(照片: Daniel Schmidt)

三星Galaxy A14 5G在许多方面都比前代产品做得更好--首先是其新鲜的设计和全高清显示屏,现在更亮一些,而且保持无闪烁。前置摄像头也带来了一些改进。在即将到来的系统更新中,切换到快速UFS内存将变得特别有用,因为它对性能有积极影响。

由于屏幕分辨率较高,手机的电池寿命受到了一些影响--但这是一个小的、相对不明显的妥协,我们愿意这样做。毕竟,运行时间还是比较令人满意的。不幸的是,A14 5G的单声道扬声器也不能这么说,它令人失望。它也还不能夸口说拥有快速充电技术。

三星Galaxy A14 5G是一款强大的入门级智能手机,其5G的MRSP低于200美元--没有多少其他手机可以与之竞争。

仅以不到200美元的价格,Galaxy A14 5G提供了一个很好的整体方案--至少,如果你正在寻找具有最现代的手机网络功能和长时间更新的安全性。后者是这个价格范围内许多其他手机所不具备的功能--另一个例子是T电话.这款手机Poco X5也可能是一个有趣的选择。

价格和可用性

Galaxy A14 5G可以直接从三星购买。购买,价格为199.99美元。你也可以在亚马逊上以同样的价格找到这款智能手机。

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G - 05/08/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 69%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
81%
Games Performance
27 / 64 → 41%
Application Performance
70 / 86 → 81%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
57%
Average
75%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A14 5G评测--低价位的入门级智能手机的升级版
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-05-11 (Update: 2024-08-15)