技嘉 G6X 9KG (2024) 评测:配备 RTX 4060 的经济型游戏笔记本
技嘉 G6X 9KG 是一款价格低廉的游戏笔记本电脑,售价不到 1,350 欧元。这款笔记本搭载了 英特尔酷睿 i7-13650HXRaptor Lake-HX CPU 和 英伟达GeForce RTX 4060Ada Lovelace 笔记本电脑 GPU。
参与竞争的笔记本电脑包括 戴尔 G16, 联想Legion 5 16IRX G9, 微星 Raider GE68HX 13VF和 华硕 TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 25.1 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.65 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" | 1900x1200 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S | 2.2 kg | 22.1 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱和功能:G6X 缺少雷电 4
G6X 的哑灰色("枪灰色")底座由塑料制成,盖子背面则使用了铝材。机身没有明显的做工缺陷,稳定性和刚度看起来都不错。取下底座外壳后,可以看到电池和其他内部组件。
技嘉 G6X 9KG 拥有 1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 1 和 1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A 端口,以及 2 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C 端口,分别提供 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort-out。总之,G6X 有两个视频输出端口(1 个 HDMI、1 个 DP)。没有存储卡读卡器。1280 x 720 0.9 MP 网络摄像头提供标准功能。
在最佳测试条件下,我们获得了出色的 Wi-Fi 数据吞吐量,在这种条件下,附近没有 Wi-Fi 设备,笔记本电脑与服务器 PC 之间的距离只有 1 米。该笔记本使用英特尔 AX211 Wi-Fi 6E 芯片。有线连接由 Realtek RTL8168/8111 控制器处理。
输入设备:适合日常使用的背光键盘
G6X 采用带数字键盘、RGB 灯光和平整光滑按键的 Chiclet 键盘,可满足日常键入需求。键盘在键入时略有倾斜,但这并不影响打字。
按键阻力感觉很轻。一个好的方面是方向键是全尺寸的。
多点触控触摸板(12.1 厘米 x 8.5 厘米)行程较短,按压点清晰,可替代鼠标。
显示屏FHD+ 165 Hz,无 PWM
分辨率为 1920 x 1200 的 165 Hz 16:10 面板反应灵敏,在任何亮度设置下都不会出现 PWM 闪烁。
16 英寸哑光显示屏的亮度和对比度均符合各自的宣传目标(大于 300 cd/m² 和 1,000:1)。技嘉没有为 G6X 提供其他显示屏选项。
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 353 cd/m²
Contrast: 1681:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.61
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
43.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.367
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) BOE NE160WUM-NX6, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Chi Mei CMN161D (160GME), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NE160QDM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF Chi Mei N160JME-GTK, IPS, 1900x1200, 16" | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 60% | 68% | -0% | 62% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.8 | 67.5 61% | 72.4 73% | 41.6 0% | 69.3 66% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.4 | 98.5 58% | 100 60% | 62.2 0% | 97.3 56% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.3 | 69.3 60% | 74.1 71% | 43 -1% | 70.7 63% |
Response Times | 67% | 65% | 23% | 58% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.5 ? | 7.6 ? 81% | 12.5 ? 69% | 17.3 ? 57% | 15.6 ? 61% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21.6 ? | 10.4 ? 52% | 8.7 ? 60% | 24.2 ? -12% | 10 ? 54% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 15% | 39% | -2% | 25% | |
Brightness middle | 353 | 369 5% | 526 49% | 300.9 -15% | 301 -15% |
Brightness | 318 | 344 8% | 500 57% | 302 -5% | 294 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 89 10% | 87 7% | 93 15% | 94 16% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.26 -24% | 0.33 -57% | 0.31 -48% | 0.21 -0% |
Contrast | 1681 | 1419 -16% | 1594 -5% | 971 -42% | 1433 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.21 | 3.04 42% | 1.2 77% | 4.6 12% | 1.79 66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.95 | 5.56 72% | 2.1 89% | 17.6 12% | 3.48 83% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.61 | 2.35 35% | 1 72% | 2.04 43% | 1.2 67% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 3.38 6% | 1.3 64% | 3.3 8% | 2.5 31% |
Gamma | 2.367 93% | 2.47 89% | 2.23 99% | 2.09 105% | 2.265 97% |
CCT | 7138 91% | 6040 108% | 6391 102% | 7151 91% | 6157 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 47% /
32% | 57% /
49% | 7% /
2% | 48% /
38% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏的色彩还原效果一般:偏差约为 5.2,没有达到 deltaE 2000 < 3 的目标。校准可将偏差降低到 3.6,并确保灰阶更加均衡。
该面板无法完全再现 AdobeRGB、sRGB 和 DCI-P3 色彩空间。在这方面,G6X 的竞争对手提供了更好的屏幕。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.1 ms rise | |
↘ 10.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 21.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
IPS 面板提供了相对稳定的视角,可以从极端位置读取。如果阳光不太强烈,也可以在户外使用显示器。
性能猛禽湖和阿达-拉芙蕾丝为 16 英寸机身提供动力
技嘉推出 G6X 9KG 中端游戏笔记本。Raptor Lake-HX 和 Ada Lovelace 提供了必要的计算能力。
测试条件
G6X 提供三种制造商特定的性能模式(见下表),可通过控制中心应用程序进行切换。娱乐模式 "用于基准测试,而 "静音模式 "用于电池测试。两种模式都提供自动风扇控制功能。
性能模式 | 娱乐模式 | 静音模式(=dGPU 关闭) | |
---|---|---|---|
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 135 W | 55 W | 25 W |
功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 155 W | 115 W | 30 W |
噪音(Witcher 3 1080p Ultra) | 55 dB(A) | 51 dB(A) | 33 dB(A) |
性能(Witcher 3 1080p Ultra) | ~102 fps | ~100 fps | 4 fps |
处理器
14 个 CPU 内核 酷睿 i7-13650HX(6P+8E) 的最高时钟频率分别为 4.9 GHz (P)和 3.6 GHz (E)。持续的多线程负载(Cinebench R15 多核循环)导致时钟频率从第四次运行下降到第五次运行。之后,时钟速率保持在一个相当稳定的水平。性能模式可确保永久保持较高数值。
基准值略低于 CPU 平均值,但性能模式下的性能提升幅度较小。在电池模式下,Cinebench R15 中更相关的单线程性能下降幅度(168 分)小于多线程性能下降幅度(1225 分)。
Cinebench R15 Multi-core loop test
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.3.4.2) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (38.9 - 58.8, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (6.3.4.2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.3.4.2) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (v6.85.6300) | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (13404 - 20012, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (68241 - 97317, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (v6.85.6300) | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (3127 - 4487, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (108627 - 110589, n=4) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (9134 - 10802, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (33391 - 48323, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (v6.85.6300) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (64436 - 85343, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (v6.85.6300) | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (1136 - 1262, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (v6.85.6300) | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (7270 - 10900, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (v6.85.6300) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (36170 - 41319, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) |
系统性能
技嘉 G6X 运行流畅,而且不缺乏计算能力。这款笔记本在处理游戏、流媒体和渲染时没有任何问题。
内存的传输速率达到了 DDR5-4800 内存的正常水平。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (6984 - 7613, n=3) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9532 - 11151, n=3) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9961 - 10204, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8323 - 11686, n=3) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1839 - 1951, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1730 - 1864, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2020 - 2063, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1544 - 1907, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (268 - 302, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (260 - 276, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 328, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (507 - 511, n=3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7613 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (59266 - 64308, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (67305 - 68612, n=4) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (58028 - 60298, n=4) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (83.7 - 90.8, n=4) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
标准的 LatencyMon 测试(网上冲浪、4k 视频播放、Prime95 高负载)发现了异常。该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会带来改进甚至恶化。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
G6X 共可容纳两个 M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 4 固态硬盘。不支持 RAID。我们测试设备中的 1 TB 技嘉固态硬盘提供了非常好的数据传输速率。
我们没有观察到任何热节流问题,这是一件好事。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
技嘉安装 105 W GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑 GPU(3,424着色器、128位总线、8 GB GDDR6)。RTX 4060 是 Nvidia 当前 GPU 系列中的中端型号。
基准值和帧率均高于 RTX 4060 的平均水平。性能模式最多只能提供微弱的加分。在 dGPU 和 Optimus 模式之间切换需要重启,因为不支持高级 Optimus。
3DMark 11 Performance | 30293 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23737 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10260 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (77 - 159.7, n=42) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (neu) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (76.9 - 126.3, n=47) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 (1.3) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (1.3) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (1.3) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (1.3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (75.1 - 109.8, n=50) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (1.3) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (135.3 - 210, n=49) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (1.47.22.14 D3D12) |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (56.4 - 93.1, n=30) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
Average of class Gaming (11.9 - 77.7, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (23.6 - 37.4, n=21) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR on) | |
Average of class Gaming (5.99 - 157.1, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (68.5 - 92.4, n=4) |
Skull & Bones - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (31 - 118, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (65 - 73, n=5) |
Last Epoch - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (120.4 - 122.8, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 204, n=9, last 2 years) |
Helldivers 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (82.3 - 85.6, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 141.2, n=9, last 2 years) |
Ready or Not - 1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (131.5 - 133.7, n=2) | |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 155.1, n=10, last 2 years) |
The Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 183.6 | 180.4 | 174.6 | 115.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 400.9 | 306.6 | 186.5 | 100 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 183.7 | 164.4 | 157.6 | 142.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 186.5 | 139.3 | 101.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 155.1 | 132.7 | 107.1 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 473 | 263 | 209 | 182.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 118.3 | 94.8 | 81.1 | 69.7 |
Ready or Not (2023) | 218 | 152.4 | 147.6 | 131.5 |
Helldivers 2 (2024) | 123.9 | 97.6 | 88.5 | 85.6 |
Skull & Bones (2024) | 125 | 111 | 97 | 73 |
Last Epoch (2024) | 195.5 | 184.6 | 164.1 | 122.8 |
排放和能源:G6X 运行时间长
噪音排放
在满负荷状态下(娱乐模式),声压级 (SPL) 最高可达 54 dB(A)。在性能模式下,声压级会更高。使用静音模式可以大大降低运行噪音。
不过,这显然会牺牲性能,因为这不是 dGPU 的工作方式。一般来说,日常使用建议使用娱乐模式。在满负荷运行后,噪音仍保持在中等水平。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30 / 32 / 35 dB(A) |
Load |
| 51 / 54 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A) |
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 21% | 7% | 2% | 11% | |
off / environment * | 26 | 23 12% | 24 8% | 23.3 10% | 25 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 30 | 23 23% | 24 20% | 25 17% | 25 17% |
Idle Average * | 32 | 23 28% | 28.8 10% | 31.3 2% | 26 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 35 | 27.96 20% | 32 9% | 37.5 -7% | 28 20% |
Load Average * | 51 | 27.96 45% | 45.5 11% | 44 14% | 43 16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 47.89 6% | 53.1 -4% | 57 -12% | 51 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 54 | 47.89 11% | 55.7 -3% | 60.1 -11% | 53 2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
压力测试和 Witcher 3 测试最多只能确保笔记本电脑适度发热。偶尔会达到较低的 40 °C。在日常使用中(办公、互联网浏览),数值保持在绿色范围内。
极限压力测试场景(Prime95 和 FurMark 连续运行)可检查满负荷下的系统稳定性。G6X 的 CPU 最初以全功率运行,但很快将时钟频率降至基本时钟水平。GPU 时钟频率从 2.3 GHz-2.6 GHz 降至 1.9-2.1 GHz。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -15% | 2% | 4% | -4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 49 -20% | 40.4 1% | 41.4 -1% | 53 -29% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43 | 58 -35% | 43.8 -2% | 45.4 -6% | 48 -12% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 35 -9% | 30.3 5% | 29.8 7% | 30 6% |
Idle Bottom * | 37 | 35 5% | 35.3 5% | 31.4 15% | 30 19% |
* ... smaller is better
扬声器
立体声扬声器整体音效不错。不过,低音不足。
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.55 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源消耗
功耗处于所安装硬件的正常水平。 Witcher 3 测试以恒定的能耗运行,但在压力测试期间需求会略有波动。
电源输出功率在几分钟内高于额定功率(180 W),但随后会降至额定功率水平。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
Idle | 12 / 13 / 27 Watt |
Load |
105 / 210 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power consumption: External monitor
电池寿命
技嘉 G6X 在实际 WLAN 测试(使用脚本访问网站时的负载映射)中达到了 7:54 小时的运行时间,这是一个不错的数值,也是比较中运行时间第二好的产品。
Pros
Cons
结论全面综合
技嘉 G6X 9KG 专为高至最高设置下的全高清游戏而设计,但它的 酷睿 i7-13650HX和 GeForce RTX 4060配置也能在视频编辑和渲染等其他领域提供出色表现。快速的 1 TB PCIe Gen 4 SSD 可确保较短的加载时间。
技嘉 G6X 9KG (2024) 是一款性能稳定的中端游戏笔记本电脑"。
这款笔记本在负载情况下发热量不大,但会产生很大的噪音。静音电源配置文件可以解决这个问题,但这会导致 dGPU 关闭。因此,不到 8 小时的良好 Wi-Fi 运行时间也就不足为奇了。
G6X 没有配备任何现代 Thunderbolt 或 USB4 端口。由于其中一个 USB Type-C 端口支持 Power Delivery,因此专有的电源装置可以在家中正常工作。两个 USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C 端口还可以轻松集成到现有的工作站设置中。
16 英寸 WUXGA 165 Hz IPS 雾面显示屏给人的整体印象不错,但色彩空间覆盖不足。
作为替代方案,联想 联想Legion 5 16IRX G9可以考虑。它的 GPU 性能更强,屏幕更亮,色彩空间覆盖率更高。
价格和供应情况
在美国,技嘉 G6X 9KG (2024) 在亚马逊的售价约为 1,350 美元。
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
- 03/22/2024 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.