联想Legion 5i 16 G9 评测--配备 Raptor Lake-HX 和人工智能引擎的快速游戏笔记本电脑
联想刚刚在今年的 CES 上发布了它的新游戏本Legion 5i 16 G9，我们已经有机会对它进行了测试。联想的这款中端游戏笔记本介于更便宜的 LOQ 系列和更昂贵的Legion 5 Pro 之间。它配备了全新的 Raptor-Lake-HX 处理器，即 酷睿 i7-14650HX的 115 瓦版本 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑(包括高级 Optimus）和快速的 240-Hz WQXGA 面板，新的Legion 5i 16 完全专注于性能，省去了大量的机箱照明。此外，制造商还使用了特殊的 AI 芯片--据称联想的 AI Engine+ 将进一步改善用户的游戏体验。
我们测试的是Legion 5i 16IRX G9 版本，配备酷睿 i7 处理器、RTX 4060 笔记本电脑、240 赫兹显示屏、16 GB 内存以及 1 TB PCIe SSD，售价 1610 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 26.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 25.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 85.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | HP Victus 16-r0076TX i5-13500HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Alienware m16 R1 Intel i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 25.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
外壳 -Legion 部分采用铝制外壳。
作为一款游戏笔记本电脑，该设备的外壳非常光滑，如果你喜欢更醒目的东西，那么Legion 5i 很可能会让你失望。除了黑色键盘和边框外，它没有更多的色彩对比，此外，联想还决定不安装任何外壳照明。只有电源按钮周围的 LED 状态指示灯会亮起四种颜色，取决于正在使用的能源配置文件。至少这意味着你还可以在大学等更专业的场合使用这款笔记本电脑。
在质量方面，虽然只有机盖是铝制的，但机壳却给人一种高端的感觉。底座完全由塑料制成，但顶部的手感仍然非常好。只有底部比较粗糙，给人一种廉价的感觉。该机箱的一个优点是不易沾染灰尘和指纹。它的整体稳定性很好，但这并不令人惊讶，因为底座非常厚（后部最多 2 厘米）。显示屏铰链设置合理，单手即可打开笔记本电脑；最大打开角度为 180 度。
它重达 2.4 千克，绝非轻如鸿毛，但在同类产品中，我们的测试样品表现出色。它的占地面积也使其成为最紧凑的机型之一。230 瓦的电源需要额外增加 869 克。
连接性 - 联想放弃了 Thunderbolt
在Legion 5i 16（以及Legion Pro 5i）上，联想决定不安装 Thunderbolt 4，但反过来，它的三面都分布着其他不错的端口。背面是电源接口和 HDMI 端口，左侧有三个 USB 端口，右侧还有两个 USB 接口。所有视频输出都通过 dGPU 连接，这意味着在连接外部显示器时，Nvidia GPU 始终处于激活状态。
SD 读卡器
设备右侧的 microSD 读卡器不能完全读卡，而且速度也不是特别快。结合我们的参考卡（Angelibird AV Pro V60），我们测得的传输速率较低，约为 30 MB/s。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
交流
联想为Legion 配备了英特尔的 AX211 WLAN 模块，除了蓝牙 5.3 之外，它还掌握了当前 6 GHz 网络的 Wi-Fi-6E 标准。与华硕的参考路由器配合使用，它的传输速率总体上非常出色，尽管有时竞争对手的传输速率仍然更快。不过，在实际使用中你应该不会注意到这一点，而且在测试过程中，我们从未遇到过任何信号质量问题。此外，这款笔记本电脑还配备了一个千兆以太网端口，用于有线连接。
| Networking | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
网络摄像头
Legion 5i 的 1080p 网络摄像头可以在光线良好的条件下拍摄出漂亮的照片。另一方面，它不支持任何额外的工作室效果，也没有通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别的红外传感器。右侧有一个开关，可以关闭网络摄像头。
维护
底壳部分使用普通的十字头螺钉连接，但卸下这些螺钉后，底壳仍能牢牢固定。您应该使用合适的工具将其撬开。笔记本内部的维护选项很不错，除了两个内存插槽外，还有两个 M.2-2280 SSD 插槽。WLAN 模块和电池（旋入式）也可以更换。
输入设备 - 1.5 毫米升降器，不带 RGB 灯光
黑色键盘（包括专用数字小键盘和偏移方向键）是我们在其他Legion 机型上已经熟悉的键盘。它的键程为 1.5 毫米，总的来说，在上面打字感觉很舒适。除了游戏，用这款键盘输入较长的文字也不成问题。我们的测试配置配备了背光键盘，有两种亮度设置；您还可以选择配备彩色四区背光的键盘。
点击板的位置略微偏左，其大小（12 x 7.5 厘米）非常适合正常的指针操作--效果也绝对不错。点击板的底部可以向下按压，但不幸的是，按压时会发出很大的噪音。在游戏时，大多数用户都会使用游戏手柄或鼠标。这些都可以连接到设备的两侧。
显示屏 - 240 赫兹 IPS
联想提供两种不同的 WQXGA 雾面显示屏，分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素。除了刷新率为 165 赫兹、亮度为 300 尼特的版本外，您还可以选择刷新率为 240 赫兹、亮度为 500 尼特的版本。后者还支持 HDR，我们的测试设备安装的就是这一款。主观而言，屏幕看起来非常不错；内容看起来非常清晰，色彩鲜艳，即使是浅色区域也不会出现颗粒感。不过，在调高亮度观看暗色图像时，你会发现一些明显的光晕。
我们的面板最高亮度为 528 cd/m²，平均亮度为 500 cd/m²，这意味着已经达到了目标值。它的黑色值为 0.33，表现尚可，最大对比度超过 1,500:1。显示屏的反应速度很快，与其他 IPS 竞争对手处于同一水平。总而言之，该屏幕非常适合游戏，其数值也优于竞争对手。它还支持 HDR 内容（但 HDR 必须通过 Windows 设置手动激活）。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 519 cd/m²
Contrast: 1594:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
74.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NE160QDM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Victus 16-r0077ng CMN162D, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 AUOC1A5 (B160QAN03.L), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 BOE NJ NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Victus 16-r0076TX Chi Mei CMN1629, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Alienware m16 R1 Intel BOE NE16NYB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -6% | -2% | -3% | -5% | -5% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 72.4 | 68.3 -6% | 66.7 -8% | 70.5 -3% | 69.3 -4% | 67.5 -7% | 67.7 -6% | 71.2 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.6 -1% | 98 -2% | 98.9 -1% | 100 0% | 97.5 -2% | 97.2 -3% | 98.8 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 74.1 | 69.6 -6% | 69 -7% | 72.6 -2% | 70 -6% | 69.7 -6% | 70 -6% | 73.3 -1% |
| Response Times | 9% | 0% | 29% | 12% | 32% | 42% | -18% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.5 ? | 13.2 ? -6% | 13.3 ? -6% | 7.2 ? 42% | 10.7 ? 14% | 6.18 ? 51% | 4 ? 68% | 14.5 ? -16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.7 ? | 6.6 ? 24% | 8.2 ? 6% | 7.4 ? 15% | 7.8 ? 10% | 7.62 ? 12% | 7.3 ? 16% | 10.4 ? -20% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||||
| Screen | -67% | -16% | -24% | -14% | -21% | -51% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle | 526 | 376 -29% | 308 -41% | 407 -23% | 371.6 -29% | 290 -45% | 306 -42% | 405.7 -23% |
| Brightness | 500 | 358 -28% | 285 -43% | 369 -26% | 343 -31% | 275 -45% | 302 -40% | 368 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 85 -2% | 85 -2% | 84 -3% | 82 -6% | 89 2% | 87 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.33 -0% | 0.25 24% | 0.45 -36% | 0.44 -33% | 0.21 36% | 0.3 9% | 0.38 -15% |
| Contrast | 1594 | 1139 -29% | 1232 -23% | 904 -43% | 845 -47% | 1381 -13% | 1020 -36% | 1068 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.74 -128% | 1.3 -8% | 1.43 -19% | 1.52 -27% | 1.7 -42% | 2.57 -114% | 1.65 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 6.78 -223% | 2.76 -31% | 3.58 -70% | 2.68 -28% | 3.57 -70% | 4.26 -103% | 4.2 -100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 0.88 12% | 0.92 8% | 1.07 -7% | 0.33 67% | 0.93 7% | 0.85 15% | 0.53 47% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 3.57 -175% | 1.7 -31% | 1.13 13% | 1.2 8% | 1.5 -15% | 3.3 -154% | 1.2 8% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.4 92% | 2.167 102% | 2.5 88% | 2.1 105% | 2.1 105% | 1.997 110% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6391 102% | 7246 90% | 6767 96% | 6526 100% | 6503 100% | 6538 99% | 6895 94% | 6453 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-42% | -7% /
-12% | 1% /
-12% | -2% /
-8% | 2% /
-10% | -5% /
-28% | -13% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Legion 5i 的显示屏经过预校准，有几种不同的色彩配置文件可供选择。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro2），使用 "原生 "配置文件对其进行了分析。它的显示效果已经非常出色，灰度和色彩的 DeltaE-2000 偏差都没有超过 3。此外，我们没有发现色彩偏差，用户校准甚至可以说是多余的。我们也许可以通过自己的校准（可在上面免费下载）来提高描绘质量，但这只是可测量的，而不是可见的。加上其完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围，该面板可以放心地用于编辑照片或视频。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 12.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
由于Legion 5i 16 显示屏亮度高且表面采用磨砂处理，因此在户外或明亮的环境中也能很好地使用。IPS 的视角稳定性还不错，但从对角线上方观看会导致画面变亮。
性能 - Raptor Lake-HX Refresh 和 Ada Lovelace
联想为Legion 5i 16 G9 提供了五种不同的英特尔 HX 处理器，不过两种较弱的型号仍属于去年的第 13 代处理器。旗舰版最多可配备酷睿 i9-14900HX，而我们的测试样品配备的是酷睿 i7-14650HX。可用的显卡包括当前的 Nvidia 型号GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑、4060 笔记本电脑和 4070 笔记本电脑，最大 TGP 为 115 瓦，并配有用于高级 Optimus 显卡切换的 MUX 开关。
测试条件
联想在预装的 Vantage 应用程序中提供了三种不同的性能模式，还有一种用户可以广泛调整的自定义模式（CPU/GPU 功耗限制、CPU/GPU 温度限制、CPU/GPU 动态提升）。因此，你可以尽情发挥这些功能。我们在下表列出了三种预定义设置的相应参数（安静模式、平衡模式 和 性能模式）。
| 能源概况 | CPU 负载 | CB R23 Multi | GPU 负载 | Time Spy 显卡 | 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra | 风扇最大排放量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音模式 | 65->55 瓦 | 16,720 点 | 65 瓦 | 8,443 点 | 35.4 fps | 34.6 dB(A) |
| 平衡模式 | 120->70 瓦 | 19,897 分 | 80 瓦 | 9,749 分 | 43.4 帧/秒 | 49.8 分贝(A) |
| 性能模式 | 140->100 瓦 | 24,455 分 | 125 瓦 | 11,267 分 | 49.7 帧/秒 | 55.7 dB(A) |
我们使用性能模式进行了以下基准测试和测量，因为在该模式下，设备的游戏性能要高得多。当然，风扇的声音最终也会变大，但即使在平衡模式下，游戏时风扇的声音也会非常大，而且无论如何你都可能需要一个耳机，所以你不妨使用性能模式。可以通过 Fn+Q 组合键选择配置文件，电源按钮上的彩色 LED 状态指示灯会显示当前使用的模式（红色：性能模式，白色：平衡模式，蓝色：安静模式，紫色：调整模式）。在简单的日常工作中，您可以轻松使用静音模式，同时经常可以享受到完全静音的设备。在使用电池时，不能使用性能模式。
联想为Legion 5i 16 的 AI Engine+ 配备了自己的 LA1 AI 芯片，可以与平衡模式一起激活。据说它能自动识别游戏并优化笔记本电脑的性能，因此温度和风扇噪音都会增加。但总的来说，这并不是什么新鲜事，在早期的机型上已经可以看到类似的功能，即玩游戏时自动切换到 性能模式。另一方面，在使用新的 AI Engine+ 时，我们并没有发现与平衡模式相比有什么不同，设备的性能往往与性能模式相同，甚至更差。
处理器 - 酷睿 i7-14650HX
新的 酷睿 i7-14650HX的继任者 酷睿 i7-13700HX的继任者，提供相同的核心配置（8 倍性能 + 8 倍效率）和略高的时钟频率（高达 5.2 GHz）--但在总体架构方面没有任何变化。在Legion 5i 16 中，新 HX CPU 的功耗在短时间内达到 140 瓦，然后平衡到 100 瓦。由此产生的性能非常出色，与旧款 13700HX 相比优势达 10%。AMD 型号的性能也明显较差。在单核测试中，Legion 也名列前茅。在电池使用情况下，它的功耗限制在 50 瓦，因此多核性能下降了约 40%（CB R23 Multi：14202 分）。
更多 CPU 基准测试结果请访问技术版块 。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 -2! | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 -2! | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX -3! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
系统性能
Legion 5i 16 是一款反应非常迅速的设备，所有输入都能毫不犹豫地执行。只是在启动游戏时系统会短暂挂起，但这与高级 Optimus 图形切换功能有关。你可以通过激活普通 Optimus 切换功能来避免这种情况，但这样就无法获得最佳性能。在测试过程中，我们的测试设备从未出现过任何问题（死机等）。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=153, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7645 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-14650HX () | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出一些限制。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
如前所述，Legion 有两个固态硬盘插槽，我们的测试设备安装的是 1 TB 版本的三星 PM9A1（980 Pro 的 OEM 版本），用户在首次启动笔记本电脑后可自由使用的容量为 888 GB。PCIe-4.0固态硬盘的总体性能非常出色，但在长期负载的情况下，它并不能保持稳定。在日常使用中，这应该不会造成任何限制，但额外的冷却器（或散热器）可以解决这个问题。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在测试设备中，联想安装了当前的 英伟达GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑你甚至可以通过 Vantage 应用程序对 GPU 进行超频。在我们的测试中，其最高时钟频率为 2430 MHz。通过 MUX 开关支持高级 Optimus，这在我们的测试中运行稳定，但你也可以完全关闭处理器的 iGPU。
RTX 4060 笔记本电脑在基准测试中表现非常出色，仅输给了RTX-4070 两款机型--不过，与HP Victus 的差距并不大。GPU 的性能在长期负载下保持完全稳定，但在电池使用情况下，GPU 只能消耗 50 瓦。这导致性能损失略高于 30%。更多 GPU 基准测试请访问。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 32891 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25376 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 11731 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (19 - 28, n=50) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (39 - 53, n=50) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (189 - 452, n=50) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
总的来说，这款笔记本电脑的游戏性能非常出色，达到了 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的高端水平。所有当前的游戏都能以 QHD 和最大细节流畅运行，即使是《赛博朋克 2077》或《现代战争 3》等要求苛刻的游戏也不例外。只有光线追踪技术可能会导致一些问题，明智的做法是使用 DLSS 等升频技术。此外，它的游戏性能完全保持稳定，即使长时间运行也是如此。更多游戏基准测试 这里。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 Intel | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 | |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 186 | 182.8 | 120.2 | 89 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 229 | 97.2 | 83 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 209 | 189.7 | 179.9 | 168.7 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 154.2 | 106.3 | 77.5 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 180.8 | 171 | 130.9 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 161 | 155 | 147 | 111 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 243 | 210 | 130 | ||
| F1 2021 (2021) | 464 | 380 | 292 | 146.7 | 104.6 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 296 | 287 | 217 | 71.4 | 45.2 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 306 | 292 | 207 | 63.7 | 39.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 133.1 | 110.4 | 95.3 | 81.8 | 49.7 |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 93 | 72 | |||
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 134 | 121 | 92 | 86 | 58 |
排放--响亮但冷静
噪音排放
Legion 5i 16 的两个风扇都有很多工作要做，如果不使用静音模式，它们会经常在执行简单任务时旋转。在高负载情况下，设备的噪音会达到 55 分贝（A），但老实说，我们在平衡模式下测得的近 50 分贝（A）的噪音实在太大了，在没有耳机的情况下根本无法正常玩游戏。因此，根据游戏的不同，最好还是检查一下安静模式下的性能，因为 35 分贝（A）的音量会让人感觉舒服很多。我们没有注意到测试设备发出任何其他电子噪音。
| 能耗曲线 | 3DMark 06 | Witcher 3 | 赛博朋克 2077 自由魅影 | 压力测试 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音模式 | 34.6 dB(A) | 34.6 dB(A) | 30.4 dB(A) | 34.6 dB(A) |
| 平衡模式 | 34.6 dB(A) | 49.8 dB(A) | 49.8 dB(A) | 49.8 dB(A) |
| 性能模式 | 45.5 dB(A) | 55.7 dB(A) | 53.1 dB(A) | 55.7 dB(A) |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24 / 28.8 / 32 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.5 / 55.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | HP Victus 16-r0076TX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Alienware m16 R1 Intel NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Kioxia KXG70ZNV512G | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 2% | 4% | 10% | 9% | 2% | 12% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 23 4% | 25 -4% | 23 4% | 22.9 5% | 21.57 10% | 25 -4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 23 4% | 28 -17% | 23 4% | 23.1 4% | 23.68 1% | 25 -4% | 23.1 4% |
| Idle Average * | 28.8 | 28.48 1% | 29 -1% | 23 20% | 23.1 20% | 23.68 18% | 26 10% | 23.1 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 28.48 11% | 30 6% | 27.66 14% | 27.7 13% | 23.68 26% | 27 16% | 26.6 17% |
| Load Average * | 45.5 | 30 34% | 43 5% | 53.62 -18% | 33.3 27% | 39.44 13% | 52 -14% | 34.7 24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.1 | 54.12 -2% | 46 13% | 53.5 -1% | 54 -2% | 55.4 -4% | 51 4% | 47.6 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 55.7 | 54.12 3% | 48 14% | 53.5 4% | 54 3% | 55.37 1% | 53 5% | 54.8 2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Legion 上的一些位置在空闲模式下已经明显发热，但反过来，其在负载情况下的低表面温度却让我们大吃一惊。即使在压力测试中，我们也只在顶部测得略高于 40°C 的温度，而在底座底部测得的温度则略高于 43°C。这些都是极好的结果，而且在操作设备时没有任何限制。
除了使用性能模式，我们还使用平衡模式进行了压力测试，并将结果汇总到下图中。在这两种模式下，你可以看到处理器的消耗量波动很大，但 GPU 的消耗量保持不变，这就是两种模式的明显区别所在。在性能模式下，图形处理器的功耗为 115 瓦，而在平衡模式下，我们测得的功耗略高于 60 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16-r0076TX Intel Core i5-13500HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Alienware m16 R1 Intel Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | -13% | -6% | 9% | -3% | -18% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.4 | 46 -14% | 51 -26% | 48 -19% | 40.6 -0% | 48 -19% | 49 -21% | 42.8 -6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 43.8 | 44 -0% | 54 -23% | 59 -35% | 42 4% | 48 -10% | 48 -10% | 50 -14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.3 | 32 -6% | 37 -22% | 28 8% | 27.8 8% | 29.6 2% | 40 -32% | 29.6 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 35.3 | 33 7% | 29 18% | 28 21% | 26.6 25% | 30.2 14% | 39 -10% | 34 4% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器（每个 2 瓦）只能提供一般的音效，足以播放一些视频和背景音乐。不过，在玩游戏时，扬声器无论如何也不会让你受益，因为风扇的声音太大了。
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Alienware m16 R1 Intel audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
我们在该设备的功耗方面没有发现什么大的意外，在空闲模式下测得的最大功耗约为 20 瓦，考虑到其大显示屏和高亮度，这还是可以接受的。在压力测试中，其最大功耗曾一度达到 247 瓦，但随后立即降至 230 瓦。因此，如果使用性能模式，230 瓦的电源将达到极限。在平衡模式下，笔记本电脑的耗电量稳定在 180 瓦左右。
| Off / Standby | 0.27 / 1.2 Watt |
| Idle | 15.4 / 19.7 / 20.7 Watt |
| Load |
102.6 / 246.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Victus 16-r0076TX i5-13500HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Alienware m16 R1 Intel i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Kioxia KXG70ZNV512G, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 18% | 21% | 4% | 21% | 2% | 3% | -27% | 12% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15.4 | 11 29% | 8 48% | 17.2 -12% | 9.4 39% | 16.12 -5% | 10 35% | 24.5 -59% | 11.8 ? 23% | 13.5 ? 12% |
| Idle Average * | 19.7 | 15.2 23% | 13 34% | 19.3 2% | 15.5 21% | 20.47 -4% | 14 29% | 29.2 -48% | 16.3 ? 17% | 18.9 ? 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 20.7 | 16 23% | 22 -6% | 21.2 -2% | 24.4 -18% | 22.11 -7% | 21 -1% | 34.3 -66% | 20.8 ? -0% | 26.7 ? -29% |
| Load Average * | 102.6 | 64 38% | 86 16% | 90 12% | 74.1 28% | 94.8 8% | 119 -16% | 98.7 4% | 94 ? 8% | 106.6 ? -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 191.3 | 179 6% | 141.8 26% | 168 12% | 112.9 41% | 166.9 13% | 186.7 2% | 178.6 7% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 246.6 | 280 -14% | 233 6% | 211 14% | 206.5 16% | 237 4% | 323 -31% | 249.6 -1% | 213 ? 14% | 249 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
Legion 5i 16 的电池容量为 80 瓦时，是同类产品中容量最小的。在 150 cd/m²（测试设备全亮度的 61%）条件下，视频播放时间约为 9.5 小时，WLAN 测试时间约为 7.5 小时（最大亮度下约为 5.5 小时）。在负载情况下，笔记本电脑在 46 分钟后就已经耗尽，而在最大亮度下播放 HDR 视频也只持续了 2:14 小时。在选择 240 Hz 时，我们的 WLAN 测试运行时间降至 5:27 小时（150 cd/m²）和 4:33 小时（全亮）。
在设备打开的情况下，充满电需要 106 分钟，大约 60 分钟后就能充满 80%。在 Vantage 应用程序中，您还有一个名为 "快速充电 "的选项，可以加快前 60% 的充电速度。使用该模式充满电仅需 69 分钟（31 分钟后达到 80%）。
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 16IRH8 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | HP Victus 16-r0076TX i5-13500HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Alienware m16 R1 Intel i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 77% | -4% | 14% | 24% | 17% | -14% | -33% | 14% | |
| H.264 | 576 | 609 6% | 385 -33% | 459 -20% | 336 -42% | 408 ? -29% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 444 | 501 13% | 426 -4% | 376 -15% | 425 -4% | 531 20% | 286 -36% | 205 -54% | 376 ? -15% |
| Load | 46 | 143 211% | 88 91% | 70 52% | 70 52% | 62 35% | 41 -11% | 85.3 ? 85% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 91 | 78.3 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 -Legion 5i 16 性能卓越
总而言之，新款联想Legion 5i 16 在我们的测试中给人留下了非常好的印象。联想将注意力集中在最重要的功能上，提供了快速的组件和出色的 240-Hz IPS 显示屏，开箱即可准确显示色彩，而且无需 PWM。它的游戏性能非常出色，你可以在最高分辨率和设置下运行当前的游戏，只是在光线追踪时无法绕过 DLSS 升频。新的 Raptor-Lake-HX 处理器绝不是高效的奇迹，但它的性能很好。
同时，笔记本电脑的散热装置确保其性能在任何时候都能得到发挥。此外，我们喜欢各种能耗配置文件的分布，联想在 CPU 和 GPU 设置方面为用户提供了大量自定义选项。在玩游戏时，设备依然出奇地凉爽，但反过来，两个风扇的声音也相当大，这意味着在游戏过程中，耳机是必不可少的。
出色的性能和令人印象深刻的 240-Hz 显示屏：联想Legion 5i 16 是一款快速的中端游戏机，将性能放在首位。不过，它的人工智能功能目前还只是个噱头。
联想新推出的 "AI Engine+"（人工智能引擎+）本应在人工智能芯片的帮助下提高游戏性能，但在我们的测试中却没有发挥作用。它可能会通过更新得到改进，但就目前而言，你可能需要激活手动性能模式。有几点可以看出，联想节省了一些成本，因为这款笔记本电脑没有配备 Thunderbolt 或 2.5 GBit/s 以太网端口。
新款Legion 5i 16 的售价为 1610 美元，并不便宜，这个价格已经可以买到采用 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的机型（尤其是 2023 年以后的笔记本电脑），但即使在这种情况下，也避免不了要在显示效果上做出一定的妥协。
价格和供应情况
新款联想Legion 5i 16IRX G9 可直接从联想网站上购买，售价为 1,609.99 美元。
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9
- 01/29/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
