华硕TUF Gaming A16优势版FA617XS评测：拥有长达20小时运行时间的AMD笔记本电脑

Name: Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Brand: Asus

长跑运动员。

华硕选择了AMD的硬件--Ryzen 9 7940HS和Radeon RX 7600S--为这台游戏笔记本提供动力。一个快速反应的16:10 16英寸屏幕（WUXGA，165赫兹，FreeSync）和出色的运行时间完成了这个设置。

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/08/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook Radeon Ryzen (Zen) Windows Zen 4

华硕TUF Gaming A16优势版--一款中端游戏笔记本电脑--依赖于AMD的硬件：ARyzen-9-7940HSAPU和Radeon-RX-7600SGPU为该设备提供动力。竞争者包括联想Legion Pro 5 16IRX8，以及MSI Katana 15 B12VEK，以及Medion Erazer Defender P40和技嘉G5 KE.

如果想了解有关笔记本电脑外壳、连接和输入设备的更多详细信息，请看我们对A16的相同结构的姐妹型号的评论。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (TUF Gaming A16 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 114 W PL2 / Short Burst, 105 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon RX 7600S - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2207 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.14003.25002, MUX Switch, AMD Smart Access Graphic

Memory

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, FreeSync, glossy: no, 165 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, 512 GB

, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 400 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC256

Connections

2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset combined port, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 22.1 x 355 x 252

Battery

90 Wh, 5845 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.184 kg, Power Supply: 548 g

Price

1699 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	2.2 kg	22.1 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	33 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
81.8 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2 kg	23.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

外壳和连接 - 与其姐妹型号相比，变化很小

与其姐妹车型相比姐妹型号的众所周知的黑色外壳，A16有一个双色调的外壳。机盖的背面和底部是沙色（"Sandstorm"）。连接选项也有一些不同：两个USB-C接口中的一个已经升级为USB-4标准。

尺寸比较

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Gigabyte G5 KE Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS DIN A4 ❌

左侧：电源连接、千兆以太网、HDMI、USB 4（USB-C；DisplayPort）、USB 3.2 Gen 2（USB-C；DisplayPort，Power Delivery）、USB 3.2 Gen 1（USB-A）、音频组合

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1622 (823^min - 1820^max) MBit/s +109%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1529 (623^min - 1608^max) MBit/s +97%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1445 (1373^min - 1515^max) MBit/s +86%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s +59%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921	908 (806^min - 973^max) MBit/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	802 (579^min - 1120^max) MBit/s +3%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (536 - 925, n=42)	792 MBit/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	776 (392^min - 802^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1734 (1706^min - 1750^max) MBit/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1686 (1451^min - 1716^max) MBit/s +86%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1666 (840^min - 1685^max) MBit/s +84%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s +53%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1223 (1136^min - 1272^max) MBit/s +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	905 (765^min - 969^max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921	899 (755^min - 936^max) MBit/s -1%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE (455 - 984, n=43)	847 MBit/s -6%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø763 (392-802)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø802 (579-1120)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (623-1608)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1373-1515)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (823-1820)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø908 (806-973)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (765-969)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1136-1272)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (840-1685)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1706-1750)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1685 (1451-1716)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (755-936)

ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS: 15.99 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.28 ∆E

显示屏 - 16:10面板，具有sRGB覆盖率

A16配备了与其姊妹型号相同的165-Hz面板，可在其上找到。姐妹型号.它的哑光16英寸显示屏（1,920 x 1,200像素，IPS）采用16:10格式，由于支持FreeSync，没有PWM闪烁，反应速度快，所以得分很高。虽然它的对比度是可以接受的，但它的亮度可以做得更好一点。


292 cd/m²	291 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
298 cd/m²	301 cd/m²	303 cd/m²
284 cd/m²	284 cd/m²	299 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE NE160WUM-NX2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 303 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 301 cd/m²
Contrast: 1433:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.265

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Medion Erazer Defender P40 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Gigabyte G5 KE Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16"
Display		3%	-44%	-0%	-39%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	69.3	71.2 3%	38.1 -45%	68.3 -1%	40.7 -41%	69.4 0%
sRGB Coverage	97.3	98.8 2%	56.8 -42%	98.1 1%	61 -37%	97.8 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.7	73.3 4%	39.3 -44%	69.8 -1%	42.1 -40%	70.9 0%
Response Times		2%	-159%	10%	-79%	-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)	14.5 ?(7, 7.5) 7%	38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2) -149%	14.6 ?(7.1, 7.5) 6%	26.64 ?(12.52, 14.12) -71%	17 ?(8, 9) -9%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(5.7, 4.3)	10.4 ?(5.7, 4.7) -4%	26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6) -168%	8.7 ?(3.6, 5.1) 13%	18.65 ?(10.83, 7.82) -87%	10.1 ?(5.4, 4.7) -1%
PWM Frequency
Screen		5%	-115%	7%	-113%	4%
Brightness middle	301	405.7 35%	261 -13%	364 21%	269 -11%	308 2%
Brightness	294	368 25%	258 -12%	343 17%	248 -16%	293 0%
Brightness Distribution	94	87 -7%	92 -2%	86 -9%	85 -10%	90 -4%
Black Level *	0.21	0.38 -81%	0.19 10%	0.28 -33%	0.5 -138%	0.23 -10%
Contrast	1433	1068 -25%	1374 -4%	1300 -9%	538 -62%	1339 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.79	1.65 8%	5.57 -211%	1.67 7%	4.54 -154%	1.47 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.48	4.2 -21%	20.6 -492%	2.78 20%	17.28 -397%	2.98 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.2	0.53 56%	4.63 -286%	1.14 5%	3.34 -178%	1.02 15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	1.2 52%	3.19 -28%	1.4 44%	3.8 -52%	2.2 12%
Gamma	2.265 ^97%	2.3 ^96%	2.45 ^90%	2.091 ^105%	2.17 ^101%	2.228 ^99%
CCT	6157 ^106%	6453 ^101%	6146 ^106%	6568 ^99%	7408 ^88%	6228 ^104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / 4%	-106% / -106%	6% / 6%	-77% / -92%	-0% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

前工程，屏幕具有良好的色彩描绘：1.8左右的偏差是可以接受的（DeltaE<3）。校准将这一比率降低到1.2，并导致更平衡的灰色调。该面板可以描绘整个sRGB色彩空间，但不能描绘AdobeRGB和DCI P3空间。这与它的大多数竞争对手的显示器相似。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.7 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.3 ms rise
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

笔记本电脑的可视角度稳定的IPS面板从任何角度都能保持清晰。只要阳光不是太亮，就可以在室外观看面板。

性能--华硕利用了AMD的动力

华硕TUF Gaming A16优势版FA617XS是一款中端游戏笔记本电脑。AMD硬件提供了必要的计算能力。目前的模型可以以1700美元左右的价格购买。

测试条件

你可以通过组合键 "Fn "+"F5 "在三个制造商特定的性能配置文件之间切换（见表）。使用了 "性能"（基准测试）和 "安静"（电池测试）配置文件。GPU模式被设置为 "标准"（=切换图形）。笔记本的控制中心（"Armoury Crate"）允许你创建个人配置文件（"手动"），其中包括设置PPT和风扇曲线。

	涡轮增压	性能	静音
功率限制 1 (HWInfo)	120 瓦	105 瓦	75 瓦
功率限制2 (HWInfo)	144瓦	114瓦	90瓦
噪音（Wichter 3）	53 dB(A)	51 dB(A)	46 dB(A)
性能 (Witcher 3)	~100 fps	~100 fps	~94 fps

处理器

的CPU部分Ryzen-9-7940HS-APU(Phoenix, Zen 4)具有8个处理核心，16个线程。4GHz的基本时钟频率可以提高到5.25GHz（一个核心）。我们测量的基准结果与之前测试的7940HS笔记本电脑差不多。使用 "Turbo "配置文件会导致性能提高一点（4-5%）。

姐妹机型的 Ryzen-7-7735HS-APU （Rembrandt R，Zen 3+）明显被Ryzen 9击败，即使是在相同的核心数量和相同的功率限制下。由于其更好的架构和更高的时钟频率，其每瓦特性能更大。

CB15的循环测试显示：连续的多线程负载导致CPU以持续的高涡轮增压时钟速率工作--无论选择何种性能配置。

请注意：关于安装的APU及其架构的详细信息可以在我们的Zen4分析文章中阅读。

Cinebench R15 multi continuous test

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø3057 (3008.42-3230.23)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2369 (2270.92-3189.19)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2063 (1956.47-2112.49)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2250 (2235.89-2298.72)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	78.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	74.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	71.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70.9 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	68.8 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	58.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	56.5 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	54.6 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20341 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	19987 (10270.1^min - 19987.3^max) Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16907 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (15556 - 18131, n=10)	16867 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	15537 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13995 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	13155 Points -22%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1791 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (1733 - 1832, n=10)	1788 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1697 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1668 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1666 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1629 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1561 Points -13%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	7710 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	6889 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6277 - 7111, n=10)	6604 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6571 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	6009 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5441 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5066 Points -23%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	702 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (680 - 714, n=10)	701 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	652 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	652 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	644 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	627 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	612 Points -13%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	3230 (3008.42^min - 3230.23^max) Points +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	3189 Points +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (2470 - 2848, n=10)	2673 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2666.7 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2299 (2235.89^min - 2298.72^max) Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	2253 (1876.44^min - 2253.14^max) Points -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	2112 (1956.47^min - 2112.49^max) Points -21%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	283 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (277 - 288, n=10)	283 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	265 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	248 Points -12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	247 Points -13%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	245 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	243 Points -14%

Blender
v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	234 Seconds * -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	230 Seconds * -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	225 Seconds * -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	198 Seconds * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (182 - 202, n=9)	191.1 Seconds * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	189 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	151 Seconds * +20%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H (3.3.3)	441 Seconds * -47%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H (3.3.2)	423 Seconds * -41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (3.3.3)	376 Seconds * -25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)	345 Seconds * -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (287 - 331, n=10)	308 Seconds * -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (3.3.3)	301 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)	264 Seconds * +12%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	78076 MIPS +11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	72220 MIPS +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (66408 - 73434, n=10)	70912 MIPS +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70081 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61292 MIPS -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	59034 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	54380 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6417 - 6776, n=10)	6645 MIPS 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6621 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5779 MIPS -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	5718 MIPS -14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	5552 MIPS -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	5537 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5383 MIPS -19%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points +23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	14222 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	14144 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12111 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (11207 - 12500, n=11)	11902 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	11198 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	10260 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9836 Points -19%
Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2032 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (1823 - 2032, n=11)	1983 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1777 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1667 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	1666 Points -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1647 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1574 Points -23%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	24.2 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (20.1 - 22.6, n=9)	21.1 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	20.8 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.8 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	17.4 fps -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	16.6 fps -20%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	59.1 s * -42%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	57.7 s * -38%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	49.8 s * -19%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	47 s * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (36.9 - 54.8, n=10)	45.4 s * -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	41.7 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	36.5 s * +12%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.5 sec * -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.493 sec * -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	0.4904 sec * -15%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	0.4865 sec * -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.4769 sec * -12%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (0.4159 - 0.4467, n=10)	0.4297 sec * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4253 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2666.7 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

188.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

283 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6571 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

702 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16907 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1791 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	94.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	91.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	88.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	71.2 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68.2 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	63.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	60.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	28033 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (25226 - 29109, n=8)	27015 KRay/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	20413 KRay/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	16661 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15620 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	15397 KRay/s -45%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	12542 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	122098 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (106512 - 123214, n=8)	115513 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	103903 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	101275 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	77807 Points -36%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	76434 Points -37%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	65919 Points -46%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (4566 - 5119, n=8)	4877 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	4633 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	4566 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	3494 MB/s -23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	3412 MB/s -25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	3244 MB/s -29%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	3212 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	124433 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (118174 - 124783, n=8)	121129 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	113990 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	113837 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	104709 Points -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	87225 Points -30%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	80337 Points -35%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	15380 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (14663 - 15551, n=8)	15145 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	13285 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	12691 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	10407 Points -32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	8694 Points -43%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	7388 Points -52%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	63432 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (56839 - 66238, n=8)	61581 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	55209 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	50250 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	38311 Points -40%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	37738 Points -41%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	31844 Points -50%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (86309 - 169946, n=8)	128009 MB/s +48%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	110639 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	94177 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	86309 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	72510 MB/s -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	66845 MB/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	64725 MB/s -25%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	1339 MB/s +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	1089 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (866 - 1152, n=8)	1062 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	981 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	924 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	883 MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	879 MB/s -19%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	15209 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (13175 - 15675, n=8)	14510 KRay/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	11057 KRay/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	8923 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	8448 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	8145 KRay/s -46%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	6989 KRay/s -54%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s +33%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	37023 MPixel/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	36147 MPixel/s +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	36118 MPixel/s +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (29922 - 41024, n=8)	35306 MPixel/s +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)	29922 MPixel/s
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	29085 MPixel/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)	27871 MPixel/s -7%

系统性能

平稳运行的系统为苛刻的使用领域提供了足够的性能，如渲染、视频编辑和游戏--良好的PCMark结果可以证实这一点。对于DDR5 4800内存来说，内存的传输率处于正常水平。需要注意的是：dGPU和iGPU（智能访问图形）之间的自动切换总是需要一两秒钟。在这段时间里，系统会冻结。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7927 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	7927 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	7691 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7332 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	7201 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	6909 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6892 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	11150 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	10872 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10844 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	10844 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10622 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10180 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9760 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10505 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	10505 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9760 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9744 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9475 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9332 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	9131 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	12434 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	11868 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	11868 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10790 Points -9%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9593 Points -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	9393 Points -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8957 Points -25%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1774 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1774 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1774 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1752 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1718 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1663 Points -6%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points +5%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1720 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1715 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1715 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1653 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1643 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1618 Points -6%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1992 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1990 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1990 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1840 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1778 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1710 Points -14%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1771 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1663 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	1577 Points +14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1570 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1388 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	1388 Points 0%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5937 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6458 points
PCMark 10 Score		7927 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (59712 - 78739, n=8)	65738 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	59712 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	58458 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57466 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56560 MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	48549 MB/s -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44445 MB/s -26%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67644 MB/s +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67639 MB/s +10%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65535 MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	61609 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (50399 - 61836, n=8)	60105 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	50338 MB/s -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47514 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (72541 - 91567, n=8)	81839 MB/s +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	72541 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65896 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57744 MB/s -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	57505 MB/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	55012 MB/s -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46901 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	96.1 ns * -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	94.9 ns * -5%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	93 ns * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (87.6 - 111.1, n=8)	92.7 ns * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	90.4 ns *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	84.6 ns * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	81.9 ns * +9%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

标准化的延迟监测测试（网络冲浪、4k视频播放、Prime95高负荷）发现了一些异常情况。该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会导致改进，甚至是退化。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7213.9 μs * -539%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4343.1 μs * -285%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1128.7 μs *
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1002.5 μs * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	869.7 μs * +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	237.9 μs * +79%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

华硕为A16配备了美光的512GB固态硬盘（PCIe 4，M.2-2280）--对于游戏笔记本来说，存储空间太小。它提供了体面的数据速率，但在所有可用的固态硬盘中并不是顶级型号之一。尤其是写入率远远低于当今的可能性。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4285 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1772 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 482 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2316 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1674 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.92 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	87.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	77.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	64.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	59.3 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	54.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	45 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	33.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	5346 (4832.89^min - 5346.06^max) MB/s +137%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s +55%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2501 (2479.67^min - 2500.68^max) MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2460 (2456.1^min - 2460.17^max) MB/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2390 (2088.15^min - 2390.38^max) MB/s +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2291 (2271.71^min - 2290.75^max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	2253 (2206.83^min - 2252.55^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1748 - 2253, n=5)	1891 MB/s -16%
seq write
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4675 (4517.46^min - 4675.27^max) MB/s +180%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s +127%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2991 (2932.66^min - 2991.48^max) MB/s +79%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2903 (2823.62^min - 2902.74^max) MB/s +74%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2230 (2171.45^min - 2229.69^max) MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1671 (1641.02^min - 1670.59^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1519 - 1671, n=5)	1585 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1495 (1277.34^min - 1495.48^max) MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	7127 (6535.15^min - 7127.37^max) MB/s +66%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s +47%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	5009 (4674.55^min - 5008.89^max) MB/s +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	4725 (4035.45^min - 4724.88^max) MB/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4633 (4029.05^min - 4633.45^max) MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4556 (3742.64^min - 4556.27^max) MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4294 (3669.6^min - 4293.91^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (3234 - 4294, n=5)	3728 MB/s -13%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4903 (812.65^min - 4902.98^max) MB/s +177%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s +172%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	4797 (4359.23^min - 4796.61^max) MB/s +171%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3415 (3353.98^min - 3415.42^max) MB/s +93%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3411 (3334.51^min - 3410.81^max) MB/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2255 (2245.25^min - 2255.17^max) MB/s +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1773 (1734.23^min - 1773.16^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1610 - 1773, n=5)	1682 MB/s -5%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	65.9 (62.88^min - 65.94^max) MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s +101%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	62.6 (62.25^min - 62.63^max) MB/s +91%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	51.1 (49.74^min - 51.1^max) MB/s +56%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	35.5 (35.31^min - 35.47^max) MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.8 (32.61^min - 32.76^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (29.9 - 32.8, n=5)	31.9 MB/s -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	31.8 (31.24^min - 31.76^max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	369 (333.31^min - 369.47^max) MB/s +180%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	328 (300.52^min - 328.36^max) MB/s +148%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	281 (267.52^min - 281.12^max) MB/s +113%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	267 (258.43^min - 266.75^max) MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +68%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	181.3 (175.93^min - 181.25^max) MB/s +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	132 (125.41^min - 131.99^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (106.4 - 132, n=5)	123.7 MB/s -6%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3335 (3324.73^min - 3334.83^max) MB/s +96%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2889 (2819.64^min - 2889.22^max) MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s +50%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2025 (1213.07^min - 2024.78^max) MB/s +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1705 (1701.1^min - 1704.63^max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1678 (1211.7^min - 1678.15^max) MB/s -2%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1323 (1320.64^min - 1322.54^max) MB/s -22%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (766 - 1705, n=5)	1017 MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3737 (3683.15^min - 3737.15^max) MB/s +136%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2291 (2256.15^min - 2290.93^max) MB/s +45%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2234 (2227.81^min - 2234.36^max) MB/s +41%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1585 (1554.44^min - 1585.47^max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1509 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1457 (1124.17^min - 1456.77^max) MB/s -8%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (313 - 1585, n=5)	595 MB/s -62%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	9125 Points +114%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	7599 Points +78%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	5903 Points +39%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	5541 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4261 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4020 Points -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (2845 - 4261, n=4)	3370 Points -21%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3235 Points +77%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2625 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2348 Points +28%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2128 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1830 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1726 Points -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1031 - 1830, n=4)	1305 Points -29%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4288 Points +167%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3618 Points +126%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points +94%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2404 Points +50%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2388 Points +49%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1604 Points
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1257 - 1735, n=4)	1491 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1456 Points -9%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	5856.12 MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3976.53 MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3792 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	3697.92 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3690.93 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3667.76 MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (2798 - 3691, n=4)	3189 MB/s -14%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4750.28 MB/s +191%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3884.67 MB/s +138%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s +128%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3020.8 MB/s +85%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2772 MB/s +70%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2106.21 MB/s +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1633.49 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1156 - 1633, n=4)	1329 MB/s -19%
4K Read
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	82.5 MB/s +93%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	77.12 MB/s +80%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +52%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	63.89 MB/s +49%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51.2 MB/s +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	49.25 MB/s +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	42.75 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (30 - 42.8, n=4)	35.7 MB/s -16%
4K Write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	312.09 MB/s +164%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	276.66 MB/s +134%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	225 MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +79%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	207.32 MB/s +75%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	152.75 MB/s +29%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (99.8 - 137.5, n=4)	121.6 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	118.17 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2572.63 MB/s +80%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	2194.79 MB/s +54%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1901.41 MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s +31%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1675.54 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1429.83 MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1296 MB/s -9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (721 - 1430, n=4)	953 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3536.78 MB/s +151%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	3021.8 MB/s +114%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1949.13 MB/s +38%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1865.08 MB/s +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1411.25 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1003 - 1468, n=4)	1258 MB/s -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	954 MB/s -32%
Access Time Read
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (0.039 - 0.15, n=4)	0.095 ms * -64%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.08 ms * -38%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.066 ms * -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.058 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.05 ms * +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	0.044 ms * +24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.029 ms * +50%
Access Time Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (0.116 - 0.414, n=4)	0.1968 ms * -67%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.118 ms *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.108 ms * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.105 ms * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	0.053 ms * +55%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * +59%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB	0.033 ms * +72%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.013 ms * +89%

* ... smaller is better

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø3496 (2896.67-3526.02)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N: Ø6448 (5744.31-7139.12)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4460 (3778.02-4582.76)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB: Ø5011 (4694.47-5029.18)

Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10: Ø2113 (226.43-4712.52)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4593 (4015.9-4669.31)

图形卡

AMD的Radeon RX 7600S具有1,792个着色器、一条128位宽总线和快速GDDR6存储（8,192 MB）。根据测试，其最大的TGP（95瓦）并没有充分发挥其潜力。 Witcher 3测试。基准测试结果与预期完全一致，使用 "Turbo "配置文件并没有导致任何性能的提高。

中端GPU的竞争对手可以在GeForce 型号中找到 RTX 4060,RTX 4050和 RTX 3060的全部配置（=最大TGP）。虽然它不能完全跟上RTX 4060，但它在3DMark基准测试中仍然比其他两个GeForce ，表现得更好。在实际的游戏使用中，我们无法得到一个一致的画面：根据不同的游戏，有时一个GPU做得更好，有时另一个--至少在我们测试的游戏中。

Fire Strike (电池使用，性能) (电池使用，性能)Fire Strike — Fire Strike (电池使用，性能)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	97.4 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	87.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	84.9 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S	82.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	82 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	81 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	77.8 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	73.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	37654 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	36470 Points +10%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (33037 - 35278, n=4)	34188 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	33988 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	33037 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	30959 Points -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	29569 Points -10%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	159354 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	157190 Points +1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (150582 - 164406, n=3)	156931 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	155806 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	150582 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	136826 Points -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	27122 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	26561 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26154 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (25514 - 26154, n=3)	25856 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	25514 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	23443 Points -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	22625 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	10855 Points +18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	10329 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9203 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (9080 - 9208, n=3)	9164 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9080 Points -1%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	8686 Points -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	8500 Points -8%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		55435 points
3DMark 11 Performance		28721 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		64441 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23346 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		9530 points
Help

... in comparison

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | SPECviewperf 2020

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years)	125975 Points +93%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	104225 Points +60%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	102522 Points +57%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	102369 Points +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	100490 Points +54%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	87670 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	66133 Points +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (65110 - 66133, n=2)	65622 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65110 Points
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years)	71890 Points +98%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	55994 Points +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	48885 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	36222 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (26646 - 36222, n=2)	31434 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	26646 Points -26%

Geekbench 6.0
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points +76%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	96539 Points +47%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65701 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	65701 Points 0%
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	83464 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	83464 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)	48002 Points -42%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	4237 Points -95%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years)	2181 mpaths
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1817 mpaths
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1690 mpaths
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)	1197 mpaths
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years)	1568 mpaths +423%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1231 mpaths +310%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	1176 mpaths +292%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)	909 mpaths +203%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (5.0.1)	300 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	300 mpaths 0%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years)	15070 mpaths +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	14543 mpaths +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)	12370 mpaths +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (5.0.1)	12169 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	12169 mpaths 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)	9406 mpaths -23%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years)	701 mpaths +630%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (v4.10.07 )	618 mpaths +544%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H (v4.10.07 )	480 mpaths +400%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	396 mpaths +313%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	390 mpaths +306%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (v4.10.07 )	96 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (83 - 96, n=2)	89.5 mpaths -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (v4.10.07 )	83 mpaths -14%
CPU
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=152, last 2 years)	21367 ksamples +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (v4.10.07 )	19237 ksamples +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (v4.10.07 )	17623 ksamples
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (14759 - 17623, n=2)	16191 ksamples -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (v4.10.07 )	14759 ksamples -16%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	14218 ksamples -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )	14118 ksamples -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H (v4.10.07 )	13494 ksamples -23%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	231 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	230.8 fps
Average of class Gaming (16.2 - 231, n=27, last 2 years)	37.3 fps -84%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	17.5 fps -92%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	56.9 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	56.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=27, last 2 years)	40.3 fps -29%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	30 fps -47%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=26, last 2 years)	416 fps +29%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	323 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	322.7 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	201.6 fps -38%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	53.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	53.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=27, last 2 years)	47.6 fps -11%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	20.6 fps -61%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	126.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	126.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=27, last 2 years)	107.9 fps -15%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	86.5 fps -32%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	73.4 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	73.4 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=27, last 2 years)	73.4 fps 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	53.9 fps -27%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=27, last 2 years)	125.8 fps +86%
Gigabyte G7 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	89.4 fps +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	67.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	67.5 fps 0%

游戏性能

FA617是为高至最高设置的游戏而设计的。可以使用全屏分辨率（1,920 x 1,200像素）。当连接了相应的显示器时，更高的分辨率是可以使用的--部分降低了设置。Turbo "配置文件不会增加帧率。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	95.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 ^-1! Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	95.4 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	87.2 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	75.8 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	74.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	70.1 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S	67.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	65.6 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	107.6 (101^min) fps +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	103 (89^min) fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (neu)	98.1 (84^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (91 - 98.1, n=2)	94.6 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	91 (77^min) fps -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	87.6 (77^min, 77.42^P1) fps -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83 fps -15%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	119.6 (3.03^min, 76.9^P1) fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	113.9 (5.92^min, 76.9^P1) fps +23%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps +22%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	103 (7.98^min, 71.4^P1) fps +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	92.9 (26.7^min, 62.5^P1) fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	92.2 (4.55^min, 55.6^P1) fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (85.5 - 92.9, n=2)	89.2 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	85.5 (3.46^min, 62.5^P1) fps -8%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps +40%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	109.8 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	100.8 fps +18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	90.3 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.3)	85.2 fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1.3)	82.8 fps -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (78.2 - 85.2, n=2)	81.7 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.3)	78.2 fps -8%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps +39%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	188.3 (28^min, 137.1^P1) fps +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	163.3 (16.3^min, 119.3^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (162.7 - 163.3, n=2)	163 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	162.7 (111.4^min, 120.7^P1) fps 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	153.3 (32.3^min, 117.2^P1) fps -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	148.7 (20.2^min, 114.3^P1) fps -9%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	161.8 (140.3^min) fps +33%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps +23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	144.3 (117.7^min) fps +19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	142.5 (121.3^min) fps +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	137.5 (121.2^min) fps +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	121.6 (100.8^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (110 - 121.6, n=2)	115.8 fps -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	110 (85.8^min) fps -10%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	121.9 fps +113%
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	109.3 fps +91%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps +87%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	97 fps +69%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86.7 fps +51%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	57.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S (55 - 57.3, n=2)	56.2 fps -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	55 fps -4%

Returnal
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming (27 - 155, n=26, last 2 years)	84.7 fps +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	70 (38^min) fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	67 (34^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	67 fps 0%
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing
Average of class Gaming (4 - 128, n=11, last 2 years)	73.5 fps +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	41 (16^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	41 fps 0%

Atomic Heart - 1920x1080 Atomic Preset
Average of class Gaming (10.2 - 166, n=18, last 2 years)	72.8 fps +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	56.6 (31.1^min, 47.6^P0.1, 49.1^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	56.6 fps 0%

Sons of the Forest - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	76.7 (36.2^min, 50.2^P0.1, 56.6^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	76.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (14.8 - 93.9, n=19, last 2 years)	68.8 fps -10%

Resident Evil 4 Remake - 1920x1080 Max Preset
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	72.7 (14.6^min, 26.1^P0.1, 52.5^P1) fps +39%
Average of class Gaming (19.7 - 143.2, n=15, last 2 years)	70.7 fps +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	52.3 (6.38^min, 13.8^P0.1, 34.2^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	52.3 fps 0%

The Last of Us - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (31.6 - 105, n=13, last 2 years)	61.2 fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	51.5 (4.4^min, 32.8^P0.1, 43.4^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	51.5 fps 0%

Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 166.1, n=27, last 2 years)	73.7 fps +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	55.4 (27^min, 28.2^P0.1, 39^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	55.4 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (26.8 - 67, n=13, last 2 years)	46.3 fps +64%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	28.3 (13.7^min, 14.6^P0.1, 17.8^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	28.3 fps 0%

Company of Heroes 3 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Average of class Gaming (43.8 - 235, n=16, last 2 years)	129 fps +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	97.2 (41.4^P0.1, 54.7^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	97.2 fps 0%

Dead Island 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	148.5 (19.5^min, 20.4^P0.1, 94.8^P1) fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	113.1 (18.3^min, 19^P0.1, 73^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	113.1 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 181.7, n=11, last 2 years)	97.9 fps -13%

Flight Simulator 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra AA:TAA AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (24.7 - 74, n=8, last 2 years)	50.5 fps +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	42.7 (29.5^min, 33.8^P0.1, 36.4^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	42.7 fps 0%

Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming (35 - 167, n=28, last 2 years)	110.6 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	104.7 (86^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	104.7 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
Average of class Gaming (71.9 - 119, n=9, last 2 years)	93.6 fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	78.5 (36^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S ()	78.5 fps 0%

为了检查帧率是否在较长时间内基本保持不变，我们在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行游戏《Witcher 3 》约60分钟。游戏角色没有被移动。没有注意到性能的下降。

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S; neu: Ø95.2 (89-101)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø96.9 (93-103)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø77.6 (73-84)

Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø100.7 (96-104)

Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø84.8 (81-91)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	184.7		171.7	92.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)	382		166.5	98.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	157.5	143.1	132.2	121.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	215	117.2	85.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	85.1	72	57.3
Far Cry 5 (2018)	135	120	115	108
Strange Brigade (2018)	440	228	190.8	163.3
Metro Exodus (2019)	187.3	116.5
The Division 2 (2019)	232	167	131	95
Control (2019)	235	116.6	83.5
Doom Eternal (2020)	376	209	184.3	179
Gears Tactics (2020)	381.4	216.1	138.1	95.4
Death Stranding (2020)	189.5	144.1	133.6	129.6
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020)	134.9	85.5	60.1	42.7
Crysis Remastered (2020)	294	190.9	90.6	38.6
Watch Dogs Legion (2020)	122.6	118.5	106.6	69.5
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)	203	124	102	88
Hitman 3 (2021)	270	178.2	157.4	145.7
Far Cry 6 (2021)	151	133	119	104.7
Forza Horizon 5 (2021)	197	144	135	74
GRID Legends (2022)	214.9	182.8	156.5	129.3
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	198.1	156.8	105.7	82.2
F1 22 (2022)	263	244	190	50.5
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022)	98.2	78	66.1	55.4
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	118.4	88.7	72	55.4
Returnal (2023)	91	88	78	67
Atomic Heart (2023)	167.1	125.5	71.6	56.6
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	143.4	125.9	97.4	97.2
Sons of the Forest (2023)	93.2	81.4	78	76.7
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023)	107.4	83.2	78.9	52.3
The Last of Us (2023)	81.4	67.6	60.2	51.5
Dead Island 2 (2023)	201	168.1	122.7	113.1

排放 - FA617XS可以变得相当响亮

噪声排放

在日常使用中（办公室、互联网等），A16通常工作得很安静，经常是无声无息的--无论选择何种模式。在游戏模式下，声压级可以上升到53dB(A)（"涡轮"）或51dB(A)（"性能"）。通过使用 "静音 "配置文件，可以实现更低的噪音排放。然后，计算能力只减少到非常小的程度。

Noise Level

Idle		25 / 26 / 28 dB(A)
Load		43 / 53 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Noise		8%	7%	-11%	-11%	3%
off / environment *	25	23 8%	24 4%	25 -0%	19.52 22%	24 4%
Idle Minimum *	25	23.1 8%	24 4%	26 -4%	31.05 -24%	24 4%
Idle Average *	26	23.1 11%	24 8%	27 -4%	31.05 -19%	25 4%
Idle Maximum *	28	26.6 5%	24 14%	32 -14%	31.05 -11%	28 -0%
Load Average *	43	34.7 19%	37.71 12%	53 -23%	55.66 -29%	42 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51	47.6 7%	45.75 10%	56 -10%	55.7 -9%	50 2%
Load Maximum *	53	54.8 -3%	54.55 -3%	64 -21%	55.51 -5%	50 6%

* ... smaller is better

温度

笔记本在负载下会明显发热，但不会过度。在日常使用中，温度处于绿色区域内。后者不是在姐妹型号- 我们认为这是设备的错误/缺陷。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


50 °C	53 °C	45 °C
40 °C	47 °C	44 °C
38 °C	26 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 53 °C
Average: 41.6 °C


48 °C	44 °C	46 °C
37 °C	33 °C	37 °C
27 °C	25 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 36.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 54 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	27 °C
30 °C	29 °C	30 °C
30 °C	28 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 28.8 °C


29 °C	29 °C	30 °C
29 °C	29 °C	29 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 28.4 °C

Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


47 °C	49 °C	43 °C
40 °C	44 °C	43 °C
34 °C	30 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 40 °C


47 °C	44 °C	45 °C
36 °C	31 °C	35 °C
26 °C	26 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 35.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 52 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Heat		1%	-8%	9%	-14%	-17%
Maximum Upper Side *	53	42.8 19%	47 11%	42 21%	52.6 1%	54 -2%
Maximum Bottom *	48	50 -4%	48 -0%	45 6%	62.4 -30%	47 2%
Idle Upper Side *	30	29.6 1%	35 -17%	28 7%	33.6 -12%	40 -33%
Idle Bottom *	30	34 -13%	38 -27%	30 -0%	34.8 -16%	40 -33%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

压力测试（Prime95和Furmark连续运行）模拟了一种极端情况，以测试系统在全负荷下的稳定性。CPU（3.4至3.5 GHz）和GPU（~1,500 MHz）以低于各自基础时钟的时钟速率运行测试。

发言人

立体声扬声器总体上产生了一个体面的声音。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--具有出色运行时间的游戏笔记本电脑

消耗功率

在耗电量方面没有任何异常。对于所安装的硬件来说，这些比率处于正常水平。压力测试和 Witcher 3测试是以恒定的功耗运行的。电源（240瓦）的大小是比较充分的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / Watt
Idle	7 / 10 / 15 Watt
Load	86 / 172 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S	Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-107%	2%	-25%	-16%	-7%	-4%	-66%
Idle Minimum *	7	24.5 -250%	8.5 -21%	8 -14%	7.66 -9%	8 -14%	7.5 ?(7 - 8, n=2) -7%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) -93%
Idle Average *	10	29.2 -192%	10.2 -2%	12 -20%	10.3 -3%	11 -10%	10.5 ?(10 - 11, n=2) -5%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) -89%
Idle Maximum *	15	34.3 -129%	11.3 25%	18 -20%	16.05 -7%	16 -7%	15.5 ?(15 - 16, n=2) -3%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) -78%
Load Average *	86	98.7 -15%	84 2%	101 -17%	115.8 -35%	97 -13%	91.5 ?(86 - 97, n=2) -6%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -24%
Witcher 3 ultra *	160.6	178.6 -11%	128 20%	180.8 -13%	168.7 -5%	161.5 -1%
Load Maximum *	172	249.6 -45%	189 -10%	284 -65%	234.6 -36%	168 2%	170 ?(168 - 172, n=2) 1%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -45%

* ... smaller is better

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø160.6 (159.6-162.3)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø159.3 (157.9-160.8)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.82 (7.33-14.6)

power consumption with external monitor

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.9 (91.1-102.9)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103.1 (98.2-128)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø156.4 (155-168.2)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø156.5 (155.1-169.5)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø17 (11.6-29.8)

电池寿命

在我们的WLAN测试（通过脚本调用网站）和视频测试（循环播放短片Big Buck Bunny（H.264编码，FHD））中，这台16英寸设备的运行时间分别为12：25小时和12：26小时。在这两项测试中，笔记本电脑的节能功能被禁用，显示亮度被设置为大约150cd/m²。在视频测试中，无线模块也被禁用。

FA617提供了出色的运行时间，将竞争对手甩在了后面。节约型APU和大电池容量的组合在这里肯定会得到回报。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		20h 17min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 113)		12h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)		0h 52min

	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh	Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-53%	-20%	-29%	-39%	23%	-21%
Reader / Idle	1217	401 -67%		528 -57%		1212 0%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) -54%
H.264	746		264 -65%	339 -55%	130 -83%		408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) -45%
WiFi v1.3	745	205 -72%	260 -65%	373 -50%	342 -54%	724 -3%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) -50%
Load	52	41 -21%	89 71%	76 46%	62 19%	90 73%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 64%
Witcher 3 ultra					79		78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 16:10格式的哑光WUXGA显示屏（165赫兹）。

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 两个M.2插槽（PCIe 4，M.2-2280）。

+ 可扩展内存

+ USB 4

+ 电源传输

+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 负载下会变得很吵

- 低端的固态硬盘，存储量小

- 平庸的WLAN数据率

- 键盘的反馈有弹性

- 令人失望的网络摄像头

结论--华硕笔记本电脑的存储空间（太小）。

A16是为高至最高设置的WUXGA游戏而设置的，但它应该在许多其他领域，如视频编辑和渲染中发挥作用。由一个AMD团队组成的Ryzen 9 7940HS和Radeon RX 7600S为笔记本电脑提供了必要的性能。这两个组件以持续的高时钟速率运行。

华硕TUF游戏A16优势版是一款全面的中端游戏笔记本电脑，其令人印象深刻的电池运行时间是它的骄傲和喜悦。

相比之下Ryzen-7-7735HS中发现的APU姐妹型号7940HS-APU的CPU性能要好得多，尽管它有相同数量的内核和相同的功率限制。在这里，它的现代架构（Zen 4相对于Zen 3+）和更高的时钟速率使自己出名。

该设备惊人的运行时间当然是其独特的卖点：它的实际测量值约为12.5小时，这通常是许多其他办公笔记本电脑无法达到的。一个积极因素：电池可以用USB-C电源充电（最小65瓦，20伏）--一个USB-C端口支持Power Delivery。专用电源就不一定要随身携带了。

安装的IPS显示屏（16英寸，1,920 x 1,200像素）具有16:10的工作比例，总体上给我们留下了良好的印象--如果有的话，亮度可以再强一点。安装的入门级固态硬盘将完全适合于简单的办公笔记本电脑--但不适合1700美元的游戏笔记本电脑。提供的存储（512GB）和数据既没有达到用户的要求，也没有达到用户的期望。

这款Legion Pro 5 16IRX8可能是一个合适的替代品。它具有比A16更好的性能和更明亮的屏幕--但它显然没有提供同样令人印象深刻的运行时间。这款技嘉G5 KE可能是一个很好的预算替代品：你可以用更小的价格获得类似水平的图形性能。虽然如此：这款笔记本电脑没有预装Windows操作系统。

价格和可用性

配备16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘的A16版本可以在华硕的网站上购买购买，价格约为1,371美元。

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS - 06/05/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

79 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

77%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

63 / 80 → 79%

Weight

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Battery

89 / 95 → 94%

Display

88%

Games Performance

99%

Application Performance

96%

Temperature

83 / 95 → 87%

Noise

79 / 90 → 87%

Audio

77%

Camera

39 / 85 → 46%

Average

79%

87%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 338 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕TUF Gaming A16优势版FA617XS评测：拥有长达20小时运行时间的AMD笔记本电脑

Sascha Mölck, 2023-06- 8 (Update: 2023-06- 8)

华硕TUF Gaming A16优势版FA617XS评测：拥有长达20小时运行时间的AMD笔记本电脑

长跑运动员。

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳和连接 - 与其姐妹型号相比，变化很小

尺寸比较

显示屏 - 16:10面板，具有sRGB覆盖率

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能--华硕利用了AMD的动力

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC延时

存储设备

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放 - FA617XS可以变得相当响亮

噪声排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis

电源管理--具有出色运行时间的游戏笔记本电脑

消耗功率

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

power consumption with external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论--华硕笔记本电脑的存储空间（太小）。

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison