Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A04s智能手机评测 - 廉价的手机,内存稀少

90赫兹是为讨价还价者准备的?

三星的入门级手机得到了改造,与前代产品相比,在某些方面也有改进。然而,竞争者并没有睡去,有些人的价格更便宜,而且在功能方面领先。Galaxy A04s还能跟上吗?
ARM Android Smartphone
三星Galaxy A04s

三星最便宜的中档机型之一得到了更新:Galaxy A04s应该拥有智能手机所需的一切,价格仅低于170欧元(约169美元),但不会更多,这样价格就不会被不必要地夸大。至少,具有90赫兹显示屏、高分辨率相机和大电池的功能听起来并不差。

在评论中,我们将看看Galaxy A04s可能适合哪些人,以及与前辈相比有哪些变化,这些都是目前仍在使用的。

Samsung Galaxy A04s (Galaxy A00 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 850 8 x - 2 GHz, Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Memory
3 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, PLS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (dedcated, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.1 x 164.7 x 76.7
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.521W/​kg (head), 1.227W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
195 g
Price
169 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
74.7 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
195 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
74.6 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy A03
T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1
196 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
76.5 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
195 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
76.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
SD 680, Adreno 610
190 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.71"1650x720
75.1 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Motorola Moto G22
Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
78.5 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Nokia G21
T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

Galaxy A04s有一个光亮的塑料背面,上面有折射光线的图案。三个摄像头的镜头分别在各自的不加修饰的边框下面。

在正面,我们看到屏幕周围有一个不太宽但清晰可见的边框和一个水滴状的缺口。总的来说,这款手机可以很容易地与 Galaxy A13 4G.唯一的区别是颜色的选择,Galaxy A04s上有黑色、白色和绿色。

这款手机壳感觉不是很稳定。压力很快就会传到屏幕上,并在那里变得明显,而且机箱也很容易被扭曲和压入。我们喜欢这款机箱的设计以及稳定性。 Galaxy A03的稳定性要好得多。

在重量和尺寸方面,Galaxy A04s显示自己与同价位的其他手机保持一致。

三星Galaxy A04s
三星Galaxy A04s
三星Galaxy A04s
三星Galaxy A04s
三星Galaxy A04s

尺寸比较

169.6 mm 76.6 mm 8.3 mm 190 g166.6 mm 75.9 mm 9.2 mm 196 g165.1 mm 76.4 mm 8.8 mm 195 g164.7 mm 76.7 mm 9.1 mm 195 g164.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.5 mm 190 g164 mm 75 mm 8.5 mm 185 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备--终于又有了USB-C

相对于 Galaxy A03,A04s现在又有了一个USB-C接口。NFC也仍然被安装,因此可以使用谷歌支付或三星支付等移动支付服务。

在存储方面,你必须限制自己。现在即使在最便宜的价格范围内,只有32GB的大容量存储也太少了。尽管如此,三星还是比前辈们多收了10欧元(约合10美元),并将建议价格定在了170欧元(约合169美元)以下。

底部。 3.5毫米接口、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
底部。 3.5毫米接口、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
右边:待机按钮,音量摇杆
右边:待机按钮,音量摇杆
左边:SIM卡插槽
左边:SIM卡插槽

微型SD卡读卡器

除了两个SIM卡插槽外,还有微型SD读卡器,在与我们的参考卡Angelbird V60的复制测试中实际上相当快。

另一方面,在CPDT基准测试中,测量值相当低,因此平均而言,读卡器的性能一般。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
54.5 MB/s +34%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
40.7 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.9 MB/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.3 MB/s -16%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s -40%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s -49%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø21.8 (14.4-35.4)
Samsung Galaxy A03 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø29.5 (11.9-42)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.8 (17.6-38.8)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.2 (26.4-46.1)
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.9 (20.7-46.1)
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.5 (12.9-38.6)
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø46.5 (19.4-55.2)
Samsung Galaxy A03 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø74.5 (32.2-81.8)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø50 (37.9-54.4)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.7 (28.6-82.6)
Motorola Moto G22 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.5 (27.9-75.8)
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (39.6-81.6)

软件--Galaxy A04s多长时间能得到更新?

OneUI 4.1是三星界面的名称,它基于Android 12。三星目前承诺每3个月为其非常实惠的手机提供安全更新。三星没有说这个更新期能保证多长时间。即使是5年的低价手机,也仍然会不定期地从三星获得重要的更新。

目前还没有关于新软件版本的可靠信息,即基于Android 13的OneUI 5。然而,根据以前的更新政策,可以推测2023年将会发布Android 13的更新。

三星预装了许多应用程序,包括它自己的应用程序,这些应用程序部分是有用的,但部分只是重复了Android 中已有的功能。此外,一些第三方应用程序是出于广告目的而预装的,鉴于内存有限,这尤其成问题。

软件三星Galaxy A04s
软件三星Galaxy A04s
软件三星Galaxy A04s

通信和GNSS - 没有世界旅行者

去年,通过 Galaxy A03s ,你仍然不得不使用慢得多的WiFi 4,所以值得一提的是,在Galaxy A04s中支持WiFi 5。

现在的WLAN速度与其他手机持平,尽管你仍然可以获得额外的几MBit/s,如 Galaxy A13 4G显示。我们的评测样本在参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000的Wi-Fi测试中取得了非常稳定的传输速率。

Galaxy A04s是一款4G手机,频率多样性相对稀少。它对中欧地区来说是足够的,但如果你去更远的地方,你应该了解一下你是否也能在目的地国家使用移动互联网。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=189, last 2 years)
714 MBit/s +125%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
328 (300min - 339max) MBit/s +3%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 (305min - 332max) MBit/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
318 (308min - 327max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 (297min - 319max) MBit/s -2%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
299 (224min - 315max) MBit/s -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
222 (194min - 242max) MBit/s -30%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=191, last 2 years)
729 MBit/s +120%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
370 (351min - 376max) MBit/s +11%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
356 (293min - 370max) MBit/s +7%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
339 (328min - 362max) MBit/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
332 (300min - 346max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (220min - 355max) MBit/s -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
315 (269min - 336max) MBit/s -5%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A04s; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø318 (308-327)
Samsung Galaxy A04s; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (300-346)
GPS户外测试
GPS户外测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

走到外面,Galaxy A04s需要花点时间来探测足够的卫星,将我们定位在3米(约10英尺)以内。发现的卫星数量相当少。

对于我们的实际跟踪测试,我们骑上自行车,把Garmin Venu 2作为参考设备。

在这里我们看到,三星Galaxy A04s并不是在所有地方都能完全准确地定位我们,但总体而言,它提供了良好的准确性,没有完全失败。因此,这款手机很适合用于日常导航。然而,没有指南针,所以在应用程序中不显示观看方向。

GPS测试三星Galaxy A04s - 概述
GPS测试三星Galaxy A04s - 概述
GPS测试三星Galaxy A04s - 转变
GPS测试三星Galaxy A04s - 转变
GPS测试三星Galaxy A04s - Bridge
GPS测试三星Galaxy A04s - Bridge
追踪Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
追踪Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
GPS测试Garmin Venu 2 - 转弯
GPS测试Garmin Venu 2 - 转弯
GPS测试Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge
GPS测试Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge

电话功能和语音质量--有点尖锐

三星使用自己的手机应用程序,但如果需要,谷歌的Android 标准应用程序可以很容易地安装和使用。根据要求也支持VoLTE和VoWiFi。

通过听筒的语音质量很好:我们能很好地理解对方的意思。然而,麦克风将我们的声音传递给对方时有点尖锐,而且当我们说得较轻时,并非所有东西都能听清。通过扬声器也能很好地听到对方的声音,只要我们说话声音适中,就能保持清晰。

摄像机 - 标准设备

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

Galaxy A04s使用Isocell JN1作为其图像传感器,这在其他一些廉价的三星手机中已经是众所周知。它的标称分辨率为5000万像素,但通常只拍摄四分之一,即1250万像素的照片,这使得单个像素可以收集更多的光线。

在良好的照明条件下,照片只提供适度的清晰度和细节。在低光照和高对比度的情况下,增亮功能几乎不起作用,在黑暗地区的动态效果也很不理想。

视频可以以最高1080p和30帧的速度录制,这是这个价格范围内的通常分辨率。录制的清晰度在这里也有很多不足之处。不过,曝光调整和自动对焦工作相当可靠。

除了用于微距拍摄和人像模糊的两个非常低分辨率的传感器外,背面没有其他摄像头。前面是自拍相机,可以拍摄500万像素的照片,只要你不把照片放大太多,并在良好的照明条件下拍摄,其质量是不错的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera FlowerMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light

该相机在实验室里也有点模糊,在低光下几乎无法显示细节。颜色整体看起来有点太暗。

ColorChecker
23.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A04s: 16.67 ∆E min: 6.16 - max: 30.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
73.8 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
86.9 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A04s: 45.22 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 86.94 ∆E

配件和保修 -Galaxy A04s没有充电器

Galaxy A04s不再包含充电器,这在一些更昂贵的手机中已很常见。一条USB-C电缆和一个SIM卡工具是包装中唯一的内容。

三星为其手机提供24个月的保修期,事后也有良好的维修条件,有固定的价格和许多联系方式。

输入设备和操作--可能出现抽搐现象

90赫兹的屏幕使得操作更加流畅,但与此同时,你必须应对并不高的系统性能,所以它时不时就会抽搐。

在外壳的右边是控制音量的硬件按钮和略微凹陷的待机按钮。指纹传感器被集成在这里。它能很可靠地检测到手指,但需要一段时间来解锁设备。

通过前置摄像头进行面部识别也是可能的。它在光线良好的情况下也能很好地工作,但它必须要有一个红外线传感器,因此不那么安全。

键盘画像
键盘画像
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示 - PLS,像素少

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

三星为其Galaxy A04s使用PLS显示屏,这只是IPS技术的另一个名称。1600 x 720像素的分辨率在该级别中是典型的。

然而,它在亮度方面落后于同类机型,有时明显落后。屏幕的平均亮度低于400cd/m²,并提供了一个相当不均匀的照明面板,只有84%。

低黑值挽救了对比度,使手机至少能在显示屏上提供一定的色彩亮度。

屏幕在没有PWM的情况下也能运行,但响应时间非常慢。

393
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 427 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 390.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.07 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 426 cd/m²
Contrast: 1291:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.184
Samsung Galaxy A04s
PLS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Samsung Galaxy A03
PLS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
IPS, 1650x720, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G22
IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.5"
Nokia G21
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Screen
1%
2%
23%
-13%
-13%
Brightness middle
426
443
4%
553
30%
511
20%
451
6%
492
15%
Brightness
390
419
7%
506
30%
478
23%
431
11%
484
24%
Brightness Distribution
84
90
7%
87
4%
84
0%
90
7%
86
2%
Black Level *
0.33
0.27
18%
0.44
-33%
0.42
-27%
0.5
-52%
0.46
-39%
Contrast
1291
1641
27%
1257
-3%
1217
-6%
902
-30%
1070
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.39
4.99
-14%
4.64
-6%
1.51
66%
5.82
-33%
6.02
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.97
9.01
-13%
7.86
1%
2.53
68%
9.3
-17%
9.13
-15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.1
6.4
-25%
5.6
-10%
2.9
43%
5
2%
7.1
-39%
Gamma
2.184 101%
2.174 101%
2.18 101%
2.266 97%
2.776 79%
2.345 94%
CCT
7985 81%
8495 77%
8002 81%
6443 101%
7683 85%
8918 73%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在我们用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试中,灰度和颜色都显示出明显的蓝色偏移,因此与肉眼可见的最佳值有偏差。然而,这些偏差总体上仍在限度之内。

白平衡不能在系统中调整,但你可以激活一个眼睛舒适模式,减少蓝色成分。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间DCI P3
卡尔曼色彩空间DCI P3
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外,Galaxy A04s在低显示亮度和高反射的显示玻璃上挣扎。在明亮的日光下,有时很难识别屏幕上的内容。它在阴凉处的效果要好得多。

图像的稳定性也是由非常平坦的视角给予的。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能 - 旧的SoC

三星的Galaxy A04s中的SoC是 Exynos 850,这是三星自己设计的。它已经在许多廉价的三星智能手机中使用了两年,但它的处理器性能对于这个价格范围来说仍然是中场。它不能与小米红米10C与小米红米10C竞争,后者有一个快速的 骁龙680但它可以很好地跟上大多数其他智能手机。

然而,稀缺的工作内存和薄弱的单核性能导致了在系统基准测试中的较低结果,如PCMark。

在实践中,你不得不忍受卡顿、不经常出现的崩溃和漫长的加载时间,但这在这个价格范围内是很常见的。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +489%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
377 Points +114%
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
312 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
303 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
176 Points
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
172 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (119 - 183, n=7)
167.3 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
155 Points -12%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points +227%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1644 Points +55%
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1185 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1151 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1059 Points
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
947 Points -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (519 - 1087, n=7)
900 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
586 Points -45%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +452%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
146815 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
134832 Points -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (121238 - 146815, n=4)
133665 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
111952 Points -24%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points +127%
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7805 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6721 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5884 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
5796 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (4894 - 6065, n=5)
5492 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4966 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4922 Points -15%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points +236%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
274 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (254 - 274, n=2)
264 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
254 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
232 Points -15%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)
6460 Points +333%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1594 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1491 - 1644, n=6)
1581 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1491 Points
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1226 Points -18%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)
10308 Points +217%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
3248 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (3042 - 3382, n=6)
3241 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3112 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2565 Points -21%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
11617 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)
7016 Points -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1533 - 11617, n=6)
3420 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1744 Points -85%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1210 Points -90%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)
17782 Points +1312%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1259 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1237 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (1159 - 1263, n=6)
1226 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1017 Points -19%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)
1574 Points +111%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
930 Points +24%
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (747 - 990, n=6)
901 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
747 Points
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
718 Points -4%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +527%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2841 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  ()
2841 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
2514 Points -12%
AImark - Score v2.x
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
4487 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 850
  (4354 - 4487, n=4)
4430 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4354 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G22
Mediatek Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4323 Points -4%

ǞǞǞ 芯片作为一个图形解决方案,它的工作做得相当好。它不足以在真正苛刻的基准测试中以当前的图形功能实现流畅的帧率,但至少经常比许多其他价格范围内的手机多出几帧。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
137 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
122 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
114 Points -17%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 Points -19%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
509 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
509 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
438 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
406 Points -20%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
393 Points -23%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
513 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
501 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
450 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
402 Points -20%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
397 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2522 Points +23%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
2298 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
2257 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2177 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2145 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2046 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1122 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
812 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
804 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
799 Points -1%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
783 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
584 Points -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1280 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
947 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
930 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
929 Points
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
917 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
657 Points -29%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2825 Points +31%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
2559 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
2515 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2150 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2054 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1283 Points -40%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1175 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
818 Points +3%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
814 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
460 Points -42%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1350 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
962 Points +5%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
959 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
920 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
916 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
536 Points -42%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1353 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
954 Points +6%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
945 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
903 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
888 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
453 Points -50%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1177 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
813 Points +4%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
806 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
778 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
771 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
383 Points -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2831 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
2438 Points +18%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
2379 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2074 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1899 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1265 Points -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -35%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -20%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.4 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.1 fps -49%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.1 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6.1 fps
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.5 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.2 fps -10%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps -13%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps -9%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
0.85 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps -10%
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.1 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6.1 fps
Nokia G21
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G22
PowerVR GE8320, Helio G37, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy A03
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.9 fps -69%

在我们的测试设备上浏览互联网时,加载图片偶尔会出现延迟。当你过于急躁,向下滚动时也会有一两个停顿,尽管页面还没有完全加载。总的来说,你不应该把你对快速浏览的期望值定得太高,但如果你花时间,你可以用Galaxy A04s进行相当合格的冲浪。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +440%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chrome 106)
23.039 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
22.283 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
21.156 Points -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (18.4 - 23, n=6)
20.4 Points -11%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +811%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chome 101)
16.73 runs/min +6%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chome 106)
15.8 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (15 - 16.7, n=6)
15.8 runs/min 0%
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
15.01 runs/min -5%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +368%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chrome 106)
25 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 850 ()
25 Points 0%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points +285%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
39 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chrome 106)
39 Points
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
37 Points -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (35 - 39, n=6)
36.8 Points -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +554%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
5904 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chrome 106)
5894 Points
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
5648 Points -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (4875 - 5904, n=6)
5426 Points -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G22 (Chrome101)
9051.2 ms * -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 850 (8327 - 9397, n=6)
8842 ms * -5%
Samsung Galaxy A04s (Chrome 106)
8423 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
8326.9 ms * +1%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * +82%

* ... smaller is better

三星使用迟缓的eMMC闪存进行存储。这在这个价格范围内并不罕见,但 小米红米10C显示,更快的存储组件也是可能的。因此,你必须接受加载过程有时需要相当长的时间,在启动一个应用程序后,你还必须等待内容。

Samsung Galaxy A04sSamsung Galaxy A03Samsung Galaxy A13 4GXiaomi Redmi 10CMotorola Moto G22Nokia G21Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
29%
67%
261%
-26%
31%
-23%
738%
Sequential Read 256KB
302.4
250
-17%
308.5
2%
927.7
207%
215.45
-29%
257.6
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
83.3
188.3
126%
236.8
184%
510.2
512%
112.78
35%
180.6
117%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
21%
Random Read 4KB
62.7
70.5
12%
104.4
67%
120.2
92%
39.32
-37%
74
18%
Random Write 4KB
58.9
56.5
-4%
67.3
14%
195.2
231%
16.34
-72%
60.2
2%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
-62%

游戏--只有在紧急情况下才进行游戏

我们还在Galaxy A04s上试玩了几个游戏,并用GameBench的软件测量帧率。.

结果显示,这款廉价的手机是游戏的糟糕选择。在Armajet中,帧率在短暂的启动困难后达到相当稳定的30帧,在这个时候游戏至少是可玩的,但在PUBG 中,无论设置如何,它都会一次又一次地停滞不前,这尤其在快速射击游戏中是令人讨厌的。

控制装置工作得相当可靠,但输入滞后是明显的。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
051015202530Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A04s; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø27.1 (13-31)
Samsung Galaxy A04s; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.2.0: Ø23.3 (8-31)
Samsung Galaxy A04s; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.2.0: Ø17.3 (4-26)

排放 - 保持冷静的头脑

温度

值得庆幸的是,智能手机的发热程度很低。虽然在长时间的负载下,你可以略微感觉到40.5°C(104.9°F)的最高温度,但加热从未变得令人不快。

此外,Galaxy A04s能够在较长时间内很好地保持其性能,正如3DMark压力测试所显示的。

Max. Load
 37.8 °C32.6 °C31.2 °C 
 38.5 °C32.3 °C31.2 °C 
 37.4 °C32.2 °C31.2 °C 
Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 33.8 °C
31.3 °C33 °C37.5 °C
31.3 °C34.7 °C40.2 °C
30.9 °C34 °C40.5 °C
Maximum: 40.5 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.1 °C | Room Temperature 19.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
97.7 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
97.2 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A04s
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
97 %
00.20.30.50.60.80.91.11.21.41.51.71.922.22.32.52.62.82.9Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.838 (0.828-0.854)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.84 (0.827-0.851)
Samsung Galaxy A04s Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.07 (3.01-3.09)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.07 (3.06-3.08)
热图背面
热图背面
热力图前线
热力图前线

演讲者

下部边缘的小型单声道扬声器听起来高音很重,但总的来说,对于一款廉价手机来说,还是很容易接受的。它不会发出轰鸣声,并能相对清晰地再现语音和人声。

外部音频设备可以通过蓝牙或3.5毫米接口连接。蓝牙编解码器的选择不多。最引人注目的是,只有简单的aptX被支持。相反,你得到的是三星内部的可扩展编解码器。因此,在购买手机之前,你应该检查与任何现有蓝牙配件的兼容性。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.539.52537.1403134.432.74032.1365038.941.56327.329.18020.223.110021.124.812518.419.816016.929.920011.834.525013.839.531512.545.540012.550.650012.653.363011.355.980012.365.1100011.870.812501269160010.469.920008.868.325009.467.131509.867.3400010.662.250001155.1630011.759.1800012.460.6100001367.81250013.8651600014.554.8SPL23.678.4N0.539median 12.3median 59.1Delta1.512.349.350.843.943.837.135.137.940.743.84531.833.92829.927.933.123.535.423.838.819.640.61943.117.549.215.252.716.8602168.222.376.518.781.417.376.115.870.415.868.117.470.418.472.220.270.420.369.420.173.121.471.721.871.521.365.821.855.631.685.61.661.2median 20.1median 68.22.39.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A04sNokia G21
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A04s audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia G21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 缓慢,但相当不频繁地充电

能源消耗

在非常低的负载下,手机的功耗往往会高一些,但Galaxy A04s在高负载下是相当节俭的。

这款手机的最大充电功率为10瓦,这意味着需要很长的时间直到电池再次充满。在低电量状态下,3小时的充电时间并不罕见。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 2.7 / 4.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A04s
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G22
5000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 850
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-16%
-9%
-30%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.9
18%
0.9
18%
1.2 ?(0.9 - 1.5, n=6)
-9%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.6
-23%
1.2
8%
1.733 ?(1.3 - 2.1, n=6)
-33%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.1
-31%
1.5
6%
2.28 ?(1.6 - 2.9, n=6)
-43%
Load Average *
2.7
3.6
-33%
4.5
-67%
3.83 ?(2.7 - 4.6, n=6)
-42%
Load Maximum *
4.7
5.3
-13%
5.2
-11%
5.73 ?(4.7 - 6.6, n=6)
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A04s: Ø2.76 (1.18-5.64)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.30.50.60.80.91.11.31.41.61.71.92.12.22.42.52.72.83Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A04s; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.67 (2.25-3.16)
Samsung Galaxy A04s; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.247 (1.149-1.604)

电池寿命

5,000毫安时电池的运行时间很好,但是这款智能手机并没有完全能够与 Galaxy A03摩托罗拉Mitō G22在无线局域网测试中。尽管如此,16:17小时的运行时间表明,只要你不不断地给你的Galaxy A04s施加压力,你可以轻松地在没有充电器的情况下管理两天。

6:36小时的负载耐力也不错。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 33min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 36min
Samsung Galaxy A04s
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A03
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G22
5000 mAh
Nokia G21
5050 mAh
Battery Runtime
12%
-2%
-7%
6%
11%
Reader / Idle
2253
2164
-4%
2785
24%
H.264
1062
1054
-1%
1196
13%
WiFi v1.3
977
1097
12%
864
-12%
908
-7%
1101
13%
1087
11%
Load
396
437
10%
298
-25%

Pros

+ 相当精确的定位
+ 运行时间长
+ 90赫兹的屏幕,无需PWM
+ NFC
+ 稳定、快速的WLAN

Cons

- 没有指南针
- 只有几个4G频率
- 内存少
- 蹩脚的eMMC闪存
- 屏幕很暗

结论 - 你应该寻找优惠

在测试中。三星Galaxy A04s。
在测试中。三星Galaxy A04s。

三星再次为其入门级智能手机Galaxy A04s提出了一个有点高的价格。作为回报,它提供了很少的内存和一个相当不引人注目的外壳。与之竞争的是 摩托G22红米10C至少付出了更多努力。

然而,三星的廉价手机可以勾选最重要的必备功能。NFC、相对准确的定位和快速的Wi-Fi 5。你不应该对相机期望过高,屏幕可以更亮。至少它没有PWM,而且可视角度也不错。

我们的评测样品在电池寿命方面做得相当好,但它不能从竞争中决定性地脱颖而出。

总的来说,三星的Galaxy A04s是入门级类别中一个坚实的智能手机,但它并没有提供许多真正的亮点。

那些选择了 小米红米10C将得到明显更多的性能,快速存储和更明亮的屏幕。如果你想要纯粹的Android ,你可以看一下 诺基亚G21.

价格和可用性

三星Galaxy A04s的建议零售价为169欧元(约168美元)。你可以从互联网上的许多零售商那里买到便宜几欧元的产品,例如从 amazon.com.

在测试的时候。 Aldi提供的Galaxy A04s,价格为129欧元(约合人民币129元),在折扣店中。

Samsung Galaxy A04s - 10/25/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
76%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 65%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
10 / 64 → 16%
Application Performance
55 / 86 → 64%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 90 → 62%
Camera
47%
Average
69%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A04s智能手机评测 - 廉价的手机,内存稀少
Florian Schmitt, 2022-10-30 (Update: 2024-08-15)