Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A34 5G智能手机评论：负担得起的全能型手机，拥有超亮的OLED显示屏

附加价值。

三星的Galaxy A34 5G是Galaxy A系列的最新中端机型，配备了Galaxy S23的外观，并且比上一代产品做得更好。Super AMOLED屏幕已经增长到6.6英寸，达到1000cd/m²以上。这款廉价的智能手机在处理器性能和存储容量方面也有改进。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
三星Galaxy A34 5G

三星每年都会在初春时节刷新其受欢迎的Galaxy A系列。由于其良好的性价比，它一直受到买家的青睐。除了顶级型号Galaxy A54 5G和入门级智能手机Galaxy A14之外，中档机型三星Galaxy A34 5G也是2023年的新秀，在功能和性能方面，它的定位在其两个Galaxy A兄弟姐妹之间。

Galaxy A34 5G的起价为315,97美元，具有一定的性价比。它没有改变既定的Galaxy A的成功公式，但与它的前辈A33 5G相比，仍有许多不同的地方。Galaxy A33 5G，后者已经非常稳固。按照三星的标准，已经做了很多改变。这在显示屏尺寸上尤其明显，因为Galaxy A34 5G现在的尺寸是6.6英寸，而不是之前的6.4英寸。

其他改进也影响到显示屏，因为它的刷新率已经从90赫兹增加到120赫兹。三星还大幅提高了Super AMOLED面板的亮度。处理器也得到了改进，因为Galaxy A34 5G现在使用了一个 联发科Dimensity 1080，这比三星自己的SoC稍快。 Exynos 1280在Galaxy A33 5G中。

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Galaxy A30 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G68 MP4
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.60 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 390 PPI, capacitive, Super AMOLED, FHD+, 16 mio. colors, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 96.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Fingerprint Sensor, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Light Sensor, Virtual Proximity Sensing, IP67 rating, microSD exFAT support, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Limited, Samsung Knox, Head SAR 0.546 W/kg, Body SAR 1.488 W/kg
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 161.3 x 78.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, AF, OIS, 10x digital zoom) + 8 MP Ultrawide camera (F2.2, FF) + 5 MP Macro camera (F2.4, FF), video stabilization, videos up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (F2.2, FF), video stabilization, videos up to 4K@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: dual speaker, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty information, One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof
Weight
199 g
Price
389 Euro
Amazon
$224.50
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
84.9 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4		199 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2340x1080
85.8 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Google Pixel 6a
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20		178 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
85.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L		193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
81.9 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Motorola Moto G72
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2		166 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
83.2 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4		186 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2400x1080
85.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4		187 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

外壳 - 增加到6.6英寸，并带有Galaxy S23的外观

如同Galaxy A33 5G，Galaxy A34 5G的外壳是由塑料制成的，并根据IP67进行防尘防水保护。买家继续得到一个做工非常好和稳定的塑料机箱，其正面由大猩猩5号玻璃保护。自拍相机位于一个水滴状的凹槽中，就像在Galaxy A33 5G。

到目前为止，这些都是我们熟悉的。新的事实是，继任者不仅将屏幕尺寸从6.4英寸改为6.6英寸，而且还改变了设计。Galaxy A34 5G的后盖明显借鉴了Galaxy S23系列的设计语言。

背面现在是完全平坦的，围绕着左上方的三摄像头。此外，这三个镜头分别被一个银色的环所包围，这使背板看起来比前代产品更加时尚。尽管有塑料表面，但三星智能手机并不觉得廉价。它的重量为199克，也不一定很轻。

根据环境光线条件，Galaxy A34 5G的后盖会闪现出一种略带金属的色调。这种颜色效果在 "威武银"的变体中特别明显，而在我们测试设备的"威武紫 " 和"威武青 "中则更为微妙。从视觉上看，这款三星智能手机在第四种颜色的变体--威猛石墨中最不显眼。

三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G

尺寸比较

❌
162.9 mm 76 mm 7.9 mm 187 g161.3 mm 78.1 mm 8.2 mm 199 g160.5 mm 74.4 mm 7.9 mm 166 g159.7 mm 74 mm 8.1 mm 186 g159.2 mm 75.8 mm 8.3 mm 193.5 g152.2 mm 71.8 mm 8.9 mm 178 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 高达8GB内存和256GB存储空间

三星提供的Galaxy A34 5G有两个存储版本。第一种与A33 5G完全相同。 Galaxy A33 5G，有6GB的LPDDR4X内存和128GB的UFS 2.2，价格为329.99美元。第二款是8GB内存和256GB存储空间的存储变量是新的，三星要求409.99美元，因此多了70美元。

三星手机的microSD/SIM卡插槽可以容纳一张nano-SIM卡和一张最大容量为1TB的microSD卡，或者两张nano-SIM卡。不能使用eSIM--在目前的Galaxy A系列中，这只适用于三星的 三星Galaxy A54 5G.

Galaxy A34 5G的具有OTG功能的USB-C端口以USB 2.0的速度工作，由于缺乏3.5毫米插孔，也用于连接有线音频设备。除了NFC之外，蓝牙5.3也在机上。DRM Widevine L1也被支持，但Camera2 API只有支持级别有限。如果安装了第三方相机应用程序，它们只能有限地访问相机功能。

左边：没有端口
左边：没有端口
右边：电源键，音量摇杆
右边：电源键，音量摇杆
顶部：麦克风、SIM卡插槽
顶部：麦克风、SIM卡插槽
底部：麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部：麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

微型SD卡读卡器

使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD参考卡，Galaxy A34 5G实现了与同类平均水平相当的坚实的读写性能率，但比A33 5G慢。Galaxy A33 5G但在复制测试中比A33 5G慢。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
59.21 MB/s +35%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
44.01 MB/s
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.2 MB/s -22%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (22-43.6)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (26.7-49.3)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø43.7 (29-56.7)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70 (39.2-78.2)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.6 (29.3-82.6)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø83.8 (43.5-112.8)

软件 -Android 13和四个保证的操作系统升级

Galaxy A34 5G运行Android 13和5.1版的三星用户界面OneUI。根据三星的说法，从2023年3月上市算起，这款智能手机将获得长达四代的操作系统升级和长达五年的安全更新。在审查时（4月初），Android 安全补丁是从2月1日开始的，因此仍然是合理的最新版本。

在我们的测试设备的128GB中，首次启动时只有不到96GB是空闲的。这是由于OneUI和预装的谷歌和三星应用程序所需的空间，以及十几个预装的第三方应用程序，如迪斯尼+、LinkedIn、Pinterest和TikTok。如果不需要，这些都可以被卸载。然而，OneDrive只能被停用，但至少在应用抽屉里是看不见的。

三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G

通信和GNSS - 带有VHT80的快速WiFi 5

拥有17个4G和11个5G频段的Galaxy A33 5G提供几乎与Galaxy A33 5G相同的移动频率硬件，所以你应该不会有任何问题，可以在任何地方获得信号。然而，这款智能手机没有无线电接收器。

关于WLAN，Galaxy A34 5G使用WiFi 5，包括VHT80 VHT80支持，这意味着它理论上可以实现800 Mbit/s的最大传输速率。连接到我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器上，它并没有完全达到这个数据吞吐量，但对于一个中端设备来说，仍然是很快的。

Galaxy A34 5G提供非常稳定的WiFi传输率，比前代产品高一倍多，峰值为679 MBit/s。然而，类似定位的对比设备，如谷歌Pixel 6a和 小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G则更快。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
897 (449min - 907max) MBit/s +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 (790min - 837max) MBit/s +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)
714 MBit/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
634 (610min - 642max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 (337min - 348max) MBit/s -46%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
333 (307min - 348max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
977 (487min - 997max) MBit/s +44%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (459min - 973max) MBit/s +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)
729 MBit/s +7%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
679 (653min - 709max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
359 (338min - 372max) MBit/s -47%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
268 (133min - 280max) MBit/s -61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1902, n=75, last 2 years)
1451 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (926min - 951max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=75, last 2 years)
1368 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
598 (517min - 731max) MBit/s
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (610-642)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø342 (337-348)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø679 (653-709)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø263 (133-280)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

通过GPS（B1）、格洛纳斯（B1）、北斗（B1、B1C）、伽利略（B1）和QZSS，三星智能手机使用许多卫星导航服务来查询其当前位置。在测试中，这一点做得非常好，在室内的精确度可达2米，在室外甚至可达1米。

Galaxy A34 5G的导航技能也足以应付现实世界的使用，提供精确的路线指导。在我们大约10公里的自行车骑行中，智能手机几乎总是像Garmin Venu2健身追踪器一样精确地确定我们的位置，但在密集的建筑区经常偏离实际的路线。为什么它突然直接进入湖中，仍然是一个谜。我们认为这是一个小失误，并不影响整体的稳固结果。

GPS测试：总结
GPS测试：总结
GPS测试：环湖航行
GPS测试：环湖航行
GPS测试：循环
GPS测试：循环

电话和语音质量

Galaxy A34 5G以良好的语音质量得分，其有效的噪音抑制确保了良好的语音清晰度，即使在嘈杂的环境中。这也适用于免提模式，尽管声音听起来有点闷。

两个nano-SIM卡或一个nano-SIM卡和一个microSD卡（大小可达1TB）都可以在混合槽中使用。支持VoLTE和WiFi通话。

摄像头 - 三摄像头，48MP和OIS

用自拍相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照

Galaxy A34 5G的相机设置几乎与Galaxy A33 5G 相同。200万像素的深度传感器被省略了，但无论如何它也没有什么用处。一个1300万像素的摄像头（f/2.2）用于自拍，它提供了良好的图像质量，并在人像模式下实现了体面的虚化效果。与主摄像头一样，它能以30FPS的速度录制高达4K的视频。

后盖上的三重摄像头包括一个4800万像素的主摄像头（f/1.8，自动对焦，光学图像稳定器，10倍数码变焦），它通过4倍像素分选拍摄1200万像素的照片。虽然800万像素的超广角相机（f/2.2，固定焦距）位于相机组合的顶部，但微距相机（f/2.4，固定焦距），其分辨率为500万像素，再次出现在底部。

如果你想要一个具有良好快照品质的智能手机，Galaxy A34 5G是正确的选择。在白天，其4800万像素的主摄像头在标准照片模式下能拍出很好的照片，这些照片有很多细节和大动态范围。然而，在照片的边缘，它在一些地方变得模糊，而且由于许多图像伪影，变焦拍摄往往显得相当人工化。

虽然在弱光下画质会受到影响，但色彩的捕捉仍然相对真实，细节水平仍然相当高。总的来说，Galaxy A34 5G在夜景拍摄方面比Galaxy A33 5G要好得多，击败了竞争对手，如 谷歌Pixel 6a.

与主摄像头相比，超广角摄像头的表现只能算一般。图像的边缘明显失真，图像中较暗部分的细节处理得很差，因此增加了图像的噪音。微距相机的工作做得相当好。如果你把它拿在离拍摄对象3到5厘米远的地方，你会得到不错的结果，即使需要尝试几次。

用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用超广角相机拍照
用超广角相机拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light
orginal image
click to load images

我们的测试实验室结果显示，在最佳照明条件下，主摄像头能真实地再现色彩。测试图在1勒克斯的余光下有些模糊，但仍可完全识别--这是许多其他智能手机相机所不能完成的任务。

ColorChecker
9.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A34 5G: 5.47 ∆E min: 2.17 - max: 11.94 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.8 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
50.4 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
50.8 ∆E
51.8 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A34 5G: 35.52 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 51.76 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不含电源，可选保险包

只要看一眼三星Galaxy A34 5G的超薄包装，就足以知道交付的范围也同样纤细。这款智能手机配有一条USB-C电缆，一个SIM卡工具，一份快速启动指南和包含保修信息的传单。Galaxy A34 5G支持高达25瓦的充电。合适的适配器 ，可在三星网上商店购买，价格约为20美元。

Galaxy A34 5G有24个月的保修期，可以用 Care+保险套餐来补充。保险套餐，该套餐的期限最长为两年，还可选择包括盗窃保护。根据所选套餐，Care+的费用在25-65美元之间。如果发生损坏，需要支付35美元（无防盗保护）或70美元（有防盗保护）的额外免赔额。

输入设备和操作 - 平滑的120赫兹和永远在线的显示屏

Galaxy A34 5G的OLED显示屏提供120赫兹的刷新率，运行非常流畅。这得到了反应灵敏的触摸屏的支持，在滑行或滑动时对手指的阻力很小，令人愉快。如果需要，Always On显示功能还可以永久显示时间和通知。

总体而言，其性能绝对足以满足日常使用。智能手机在开机后只需要很短的时间就能直接获得感觉。然后，它可能需要很短的时间，直到应用程序开始或触摸屏对输入作出反应，但这在几秒钟后就会消退。

集成在显示屏上的光学指纹传感器很好地完成了它的工作，快速可靠地解锁了智能手机。生物识别锁定/解锁可以使用二维面部识别，但由于缺少红外传感器，安全性较差。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示器 - 高达1500尼特的亮度

子像素网格
子像素网格

Galaxy A34 5G的120赫兹超级AMOLED屏幕提供了2340 x 1080的典型级别标准分辨率，但不支持HDR。作为回报，它在亮度方面超越了自己。

在平均近930cd/m²的亮度上，OLED屏幕可以轻松地与更昂贵的智能手机竞争。如果你在亮度测量中从全屏切换到较小的屏幕部分（APL18），你甚至可以达到1544 cd/m²。在没有亮度传感器的情况下，评测样本的最高亮度为429cd/m²，在最低亮度设置下仍能达到1.66cd/m²。

凭借其令人印象深刻的亮度，Galaxy A34 5G是中级别的一个受欢迎的例外。然而，当然也有竞争对手拥有类似的明亮显示屏，如摩托罗拉Moto G72和 小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G.

当亮度设置为2%或更低时，显示屏在120至253赫兹的范围内闪烁。超过这个范围，PWM频率恒定在240赫兹，这应该不会困扰大多数用户。在Android 设置中，没有抵消PWM闪烁的直流调光模式。

928
cd/m²		925
cd/m²		941
cd/m²
925
cd/m²		922
cd/m²		943
cd/m²
922
cd/m²		920
cd/m²		943
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 943 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 929.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.66 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 922 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Google Pixel 6a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"		Nothing Phone (1)
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Motorola Moto G72
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
16%
10%
-35%
9%
31%
Brightness middle
922
758
-18%
620
-33%
992
8%
693
-25%
938
2%
Brightness
930
767
-18%
625
-33%
980
5%
695
-25%
939
1%
Brightness Distribution
98
93
-5%
98
0%
92
-6%
98
0%
96
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.5
0.9
64%
1.24
50%
4.56
-82%
1.3
48%
0.9
64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.6
2.5
31%
2.31
36%
7.96
-121%
3.5
3%
1.6
56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
1.6
41%
1.7
37%
3.1
-15%
1.3
52%
1
63%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.2 100%
2.318 95%
2.233 99%
2.14 103%
2.25 98%
CCT
6661 98%
6599 98%
6325 103%
7098 92%
6530 100%
6350 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 253 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 253 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 253 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

在标准显示模式"鲜艳"中，OLED面板显示的颜色很强烈，但不是太准确。如果你想要更多的精度，请切换到第二种显示模式Natural。在最大Delta-E为2.7的情况下，色彩精度就像RGB平衡和色温一样理想。

色彩保真度（屏幕模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩保真度（屏幕模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（屏幕模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（屏幕模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（屏幕模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（屏幕模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（屏幕模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（屏幕模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6245 ms rise
↘ 0.592 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6985 ms rise
↘ 0.629 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

明亮且可视角度稳定的显示屏在户外表现出色。即使在阳光直射下，内容也非常清晰。只有光亮的显示屏表面才会妨碍更好的观看质量。

室外使用（阳光直射）。
室外使用（阳光直射）。
室外使用（在阴凉处）。
室外使用（在阴凉处）。
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能--联发科而非Exynos

Galaxy A34 5G采用的是联发科Dimensity 1080。该SoC采用6纳米工艺制造，有两个时钟频率高达2.6GHz的ARM Cortex-A78内核和六个时钟频率高达2GHz的节能型ARM Cortex-A55内核。该 ARM Mali-G68 MP4作为GPU。

联发科Dimensity 1080实现了良好的日常性能值，也能毫无问题地运行当前的游戏。在合成基准测试中，该处理器的速度比 Exynos 1280中的 Galaxy A33 5G并接近于骁龙778G+.

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1025 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +27%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
824 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
782 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (761 - 782, n=3)
769 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
765 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
737 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
540 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +43%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2998 Points +30%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
2940 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2315 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (2035 - 2315, n=3)
2130 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2035 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1905 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1810 Points -22%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1029 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (968 - 1029, n=2)
999 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
968 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2497 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (2201 - 2497, n=2)
2349 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2201 Points -12%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points +69%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
715338 Points +51%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
582264 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
472321 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (458379 - 472321, n=2)
465350 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
398969 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
334060 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (11721 - 12564, n=3)
12016 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
11763 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11721 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11662 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11077 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
10589 Points -10%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9717 Points -17%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points +35%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
865 Points +32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
760 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
665 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (657 - 672, n=3)
665 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
657 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
602 Points -8%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +64%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
5950 Points +55%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4768 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4189 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (3850 - 4247, n=3)
4095 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3850 Points
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3477 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3054 Points -21%
System
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10424 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +42%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9109 Points +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (6684 - 7761, n=3)
7209 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7184 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7182 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
6684 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6484 Points -10%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +28%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
6592 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5938 Points +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (5267 - 5938, n=3)
5604 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5267 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4763 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3982 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3829 Points -27%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +262%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
14148 Points +203%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8175 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5104 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5093 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (4666 - 5093, n=3)
4900 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4666 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2730 Points -41%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
1521 Points +22%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1476 Points +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (1244 - 1521, n=3)
1426 Points +15%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1273 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1244 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1234 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1041 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
22490 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (21997 - 22589, n=3)
22359 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
21997 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
21639 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20784 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9695 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4126 Points -82%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points +174%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
9429 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  (8784 - 9429, n=3)
9033 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
8784 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
907 Points -90%

有了 ARM Mali-G68 MP4，Galaxy A34 5G也提供了足够的性能，以满足苛刻的图形计算，但无法在GPU基准测试中（如在合成测试中）对对比设备提出主张。至少，这足以让它比A33 5G有一个小的优势。 Galaxy A33 5G，而 Nothing Phone (1)则以其 骁龙778G+以及特别是 谷歌Pixel 6a(Google Tensor)提供了更多的动力。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points +161%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
686 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
632 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
622 Points
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
617 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
337 Points -46%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2040 Points +219%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
643 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
640 Points
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
632 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 Points -46%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7261 Points +227%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2576 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2287 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2238 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2220 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1232 Points -45%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6695 Points +194%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2570 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2279 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2273 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2262 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1183 Points -48%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3086 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2854 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2837 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2763 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2594 Points -16%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5412 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4359 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4198 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3911 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2393 Points -45%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4513 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3993 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3784 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3514 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2479 Points -38%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4518 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4411 Points +9%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4277 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4047 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3622 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3035 Points -25%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8957 Points +103%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5759 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4406 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4387 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3922 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2459 Points -44%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7205 Points +67%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5428 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4362 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4321 Points
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3683 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2648 Points -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
89 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps -28%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
252 fps +138%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +37%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -33%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps +122%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +54%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +133%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +135%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -9%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +100%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +129%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -18%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +155%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -9%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +65%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -4%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +100%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -10%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -45%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +198%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.7 fps +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.4 fps -6%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps -47%

Galaxy A34 5G加载网站的速度很快，在浏览器基准测试中也表现良好。三星的智能手机在对比设备中排名中游，甚至在WebXPRT 3和4中获得第一名。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +73%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (69.7 - 84.7, n=3)
75.4 Points +8%
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)
75.261 Points +8%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
73.679 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
71.873 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
69.688 Points
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
66.011 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)
59.8 Points -14%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +119%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
90.4 runs/min +45%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (62.2 - 73.7, n=3)
66.3 runs/min +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
62.9 runs/min +1%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
62.2 runs/min
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)
53.71 runs/min -14%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
47.99 runs/min -23%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chome 107)
40.69 runs/min -35%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +54%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (71 - 87, n=3)
77.3 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
74 Points
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
72 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
71 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
69 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)
58 Points -22%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
114 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (99 - 114, n=3)
105 Points -8%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
102 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
102 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)
92 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)
82 Points -28%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
77 Points -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +48%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
33046 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
31662 Points +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (25154 - 31839, n=3)
29552 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
25154 Points
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)
24521 Points -3%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
24488 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)
18237 Points -27%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)
2227.3 ms * -24%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
1856.6 ms * -3%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (Chrome 111.0.5563.116)
1796.7 ms *
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
1796.1 ms * -0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (1747 - 1797, n=3)
1770 ms * +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)
1766.4 ms * +2%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +13%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
1531.6 ms * +15%

* ... smaller is better

如同Galaxy A33 5G，Galaxy A34 5G使用UFS 2.2内存，但可以比前辈更好地利用存储芯片的速度，特别是在连续读取方面，这缩短了加载过程的时间。

Samsung Galaxy A34 5GGoogle Pixel 6aNothing Phone (1)Motorola Moto G72Samsung Galaxy A33 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
26%
70%
5%
-12%
29%
-8%
93%
Sequential Read 256KB
887.41
1312.64
48%
1638
85%
868.5
-2%
512.84
-42%
1008.8
14%
728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71)
-18%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
107%
Sequential Write 256KB
494.67
712.94
44%
1351.9
173%
497.5
1%
487.66
-1%
865.59
75%
527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71)
7%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
188%
Random Read 4KB
216.75
219.53
1%
240.6
11%
231.4
7%
216.48
0%
241.83
12%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
-12%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
28%
Random Write 4KB
206.14
225.61
9%
228.2
11%
230.2
12%
194.12
-6%
234.21
14%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
-10%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
50%

游戏 - 120 FPS是可能的

Galaxy A34 5G对游戏来说是很好的，即使它不一定能满足最大的细节。但要求更高的游戏，如PUBG Mobile，在高清/高设置下也能非常流畅地运行，几乎达到40 FPS。对于战术射击游戏，可以选择最大的HDR/Ultra设置。

Galaxy A34 5G甚至可以在图形较简单的游戏（如Subway Surfers）中利用其OLED显示屏的全部120 Hz。这在《Armajet》中并不完全适用，但在这里仍有可能达到108FPS的良好平均水平。

帧率是用我们的Gamebench测试工具确定。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø108.3 (94-120)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G; PUBG Mobile; 2.5.0: Ø39.6 (32-41)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G; Subway Surfers; 3.10.0: Ø119.5 (101-121)

排放--运行中始终保持凉爽

温度

Galaxy A34 5G在其SoC处于负载状态时没有给出任何提示，因为它在最高34.5℃时甚至没有变得温热。3DMark Wild Life基准测试表明，这款智能手机在内部也不需要处理热量问题。在Wild Life压力测试和Wild Life Extreme压力测试中，智能手机从第一次运行到最后一次运行几乎总是以相同的速度再现测试场景，从而实现了99%以上的稳定性。

Max. Load
 34.2 °C34.1 °C29.7 °C 
 33.6 °C33.1 °C30.1 °C 
 33.4 °C33.8 °C29.4 °C 
Maximum: 34.2 °C
Average: 32.4 °C
30.2 °C33.3 °C33.6 °C
29.1 °C32.2 °C34.5 °C
29.4 °C31.7 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 34.5 °C
Average: 32 °C
| Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.1 % -2%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42.9 % -57%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 %
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % -1%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49.2 % -51%
0510152025303540Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.83 (3.82-3.84)
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.52 (6.17-12.6)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.12 (4.09-4.14)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.08 (2.08-2.09)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.77 (3.76-3.79)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.79 (3.79-3.8)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.6 (13.6-13.6)
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.7 (17.4-40.5)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.3 (15.3-15.3)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.67 (6.59-6.79)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.5 (13.4-13.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.6-13.7)
三星Galaxy A34 5G
三星Galaxy A34 5G

发言人

三星Galaxy A34 5G的立体声扬声器能产生平衡的中音和高音，而低音则有所欠缺。其中一个扬声器位于USB-C端口旁边，第二个位于显示屏下方的自拍镜区域。

音频设备可以通过USB-C适配器连接到智能手机上，或通过蓝牙5.3配对。Galaxy A34 5G只提供相对较少的蓝牙音频编解码器选择，即SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC和三星无缝编解码器（SSC）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.638.3253031.83124.532.94025.831.95037.538.76325.232.38020.235.410020.435.712517.54216014.453.320014.352.525015.255.431511.957.940013.560.650012.162.163012.460.680011.766.1100011.873.8125011.476.7160012.378.2200012.279.2250012.179.5315012.281.3400012.981.7500013.481.7630013.278800012.974.71000013.674.31250013.4721600013.260.8SPL24.890.4N0.678.5median 12.9median 73.8Delta0.910.23939.824.429.720.425.718.325.830.73725.52423.924.518.123.92032.225.248.916.850.414.456.71756.611.858.612.962.714.660.213.665.212.271.313.676.513.877.313.477.913.478.813.477.313.58013.479.513.575.813.275.413.575.213.669.413.359.725.988.70.772.3median 13.5median 71.31.79.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A34 5GSamsung Galaxy A33 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 比前代更持久

消耗功率

Galaxy A34 5G是相当经济的。负载下的平均功耗仅低于4瓦，除了小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G之外，其他任何对比设备都无法达到。

5000毫安时的电池可以用25瓦的功率充电。然而，不包括电源。在我们的测试中，花了大约1.5小时将空电池恢复到100%容量。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.13 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.61 / 1.66 Watt
Load midlight 4.01 / 6.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh		Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh		Motorola Moto G72
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 1080
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-12%
-6%
6%
-9%
-17%
-10%
-26%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.68
1%
1
-45%
0.7
-1%
0.88
-28%
0.99
-43%
0.927 ?(0.69 - 1.1, n=3)
-34%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-30%
Idle Average *
1.61
1.56
3%
1.2
25%
1.1
32%
1.47
9%
2.03
-26%
1.68 ?(1.4 - 2.03, n=3)
-4%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
10%
Idle Maximum *
1.66
1.58
5%
1.5
10%
1.5
10%
1.52
8%
2.08
-25%
1.88 ?(1.66 - 2.08, n=3)
-13%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
3%
Load Average *
4.01
5.37
-34%
4.2
-5%
4.5
-12%
5.38
-34%
3.97
1%
4.06 ?(3.97 - 4.2, n=3)
-1%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-61%
Load Maximum *
6.5
8.74
-34%
7.4
-14%
6.5
-0%
6.62
-2%
5.85
10%
6.45 ?(5.85 - 7, n=3)
1%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-51%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.94 (1.008-7.97)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.77 (1.049-8.56)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.147 (1.038-1.308)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.112 (1.07-1.512)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.711.21.41.71.92.22.42.62.93.13.33.63.84.14.34.5Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.12 (2.67-3.43)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.07 (3.46-4.78)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.147 (1.038-1.308)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.112 (1.07-1.512)

电池寿命

从Exynos SoC切换到高能效的联发科Dimensity 1080对Galaxy A34 5G的电池寿命有一个明显的积极影响。在我们的视频测试中，超过17小时的网上冲浪和近23小时的视频测试是非常好的数值，无论是前辈还是任何其他对比设备都无法比拟。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
49h 35min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 35min
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh		Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh		Motorola Moto G72
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-19%
-26%
-16%
-21%
-24%
Reader / Idle
2975
1878
-37%
1813
-39%
2396
-19%
2041
-31%
1598
-46%
H.264
1363
1318
-3%
1059
-22%
1104
-19%
1146
-16%
1043
-23%
WiFi v1.3
1024
768
-25%
926
-10%
929
-9%
771
-25%
978
-4%
Load
395
360
-9%
259
-34%
333
-16%
347
-12%
299
-24%

Pros

+ 明亮的120赫兹AMOLED显示屏
+ 良好的性能
+ 日光下良好的摄像头
+ 电池寿命长
+ 更新时间长
+ 符合IP67防水标准

Cons

- 不支持HDR
- 不包括电源适配器
- 仅有25瓦的充电

对三星Galaxy A34 5G的评价

在审查中：三星Galaxy A34 5G。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。
在审查中：三星Galaxy A34 5G。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。

与Galaxy A智能手机的惯例一样，三星Galaxy A34 5G以相对较少的钱提供了很多价值。由于其设计基于Galaxy S23系列，这款智能手机已经长到了6.6英寸，看起来比它的前辈质量更高。但良好的外观并不是这款智能手机的唯一卖点，因为它在功能方面也有更多的优势。

Galaxy A34 5G的一大优势是Super AMOLED屏幕，它的亮度明显增加，在我们的测试中达到了四位数的亮度值。在日常生活中，你还会注意到从90到120赫兹的升级，这使得操作更加顺畅。同时，在 联发科Dimensity 1080是一个新的SoC，提供了一个小的性能提升，并为当前的游戏提供了足够的动力--《PUBG Mobile》在40FPS下稳定运行。

三星Galaxy A34 5G是一款经济实惠的中端智能手机，具有广泛的功能，并在许多方面超过了其前辈。

长时间的更新期也是Galaxy A34 5G的一个强大卖点。四次操作系统升级和5年的安全更新，在这个价格范围内绝非寻常。如果你相信三星的话，Android 17也应该能够在智能手机上运行。Galaxy A34 5G还因其体面的摄像头而受到欢迎，在白天可以拍出非常漂亮的照片。

鉴于其零售价格，Galaxy A34 5G未能在所有领域取得最佳成绩，这其实并不奇怪。USB 2.0和WiFi 5是坚实的标准配置，但不是亮点。三星还对电源适配器收取额外费用，最大充电功率为25瓦，并不令人印象深刻。

Galaxy A34 5G的替代品是，例如 摩托罗拉Moto G72和 Nothing Phone (1)这两款手机的尺寸也在6.6英寸左右，各自都有一个120赫兹的OLED。

价格和可用性

在美国，128GB+6GB版本的三星Galaxy A34 5G通过亚马逊售价315,97美元。.在英国亚马逊上，128GB版本的售价为349.00英镑，而256版本的售价为299.00英镑，相当于原价的高达25%的折扣。

价格截止到2023年4月26日，可能会有变化。

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G - 01/30/2024 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 76%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
92%
Games Performance
45 / 64 → 70%
Application Performance
76 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 83%
Camera
68%
Average
79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A34 5G智能手机评论：负担得起的全能型手机，拥有超亮的OLED显示屏
Manuel Masiero, 2023-04-27 (Update: 2024-08-15)