Notebookcheck Logo

三星 Galaxy A3 (2017) 智能手机简短评测

令人瞩目的更新。 三星最新发布的中档Galaxy A3智能手机不仅更新了玻璃和金属的一体式设计,而且还做出了重大改进,例如处理器能力的增强和相机性能的改善。这是否足以告诉其竞争对手,谁是赢家?
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Galaxy Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T830 MP1
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
4.70 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 312 PPI, 电容式, 16 Millionen Farben, Super AMOLED, 康宁大猩猩玻璃, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.8 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米 耳机接口, Card Reader: MicroSD 最高 256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,气压计,指纹读取器,陀螺仪,地磁传感器,霍尔效应传感器,接近传感器,RGB光传感器, USB Typ C, Wi-Fi 直连, S换机助手
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM-Quadband (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS-Quadband (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (800, 850, 900, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2300, 2600 MHz), Downloads at 150 MBit/s, Uploads at 50 MBit/s, Nano-SIM, head-SAR 0.349 w/kg, body-SAR 1.39 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 135.4 x 66.2
Battery
2350 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 17 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.9, auto focus, LED flash, video up to 1920x1080 pixels at 30 fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/1.9
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 模块充电器,USB C型数据线,耳机,快速入门指南, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
138 g, Power Supply: 30 g
Price
329 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Color variant Black Sky
Color variant Blue Mist

Size comparison

146.5 mm 71.5 mm 8 mm 150 g145 mm 70 mm 7.7 mm 145 g142.5 mm 69.9 mm 8.7 mm 150 g141 mm 68.88 mm 8.45 mm 149 g141.2 mm 69.1 mm 7.1 mm 146 g135.4 mm 66.2 mm 7.9 mm 138 g134.5 mm 65.2 mm 7.4 mm 131 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
318 MBit/s +41%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 16 GB eMMC Flash
258 MBit/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
225 MBit/s
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s -52%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 MBit/s -76%
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.9 MBit/s -77%
iperf3 receive AX12
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 16 GB eMMC Flash
348 MBit/s +14%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
296 MBit/s -3%
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s -67%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s -82%
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20 MBit/s -93%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
604
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
16 Millionen Farben tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 604 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 576.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.65 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 574 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.09
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7"
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Huawei Nova
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
HTC One A9s
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Lenovo ZUK Z2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Wiko U Feel Prime
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7"
Screen
-16%
-47%
-53%
-55%
-51%
4%
Brightness middle
574
640
11%
493
-14%
348
-39%
512
-11%
411
-28%
386
-33%
Brightness
576
609
6%
485
-16%
320
-44%
502
-13%
386
-33%
394
-32%
Brightness Distribution
94
85
-10%
94
0%
85
-10%
84
-11%
86
-9%
88
-6%
Black Level *
0.93
0.44
0.23
0.58
0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
2.8
-17%
4.2
-75%
3.5
-46%
3.8
-58%
4.3
-79%
1.11
54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.8
5.7
-50%
6.6
-74%
6.4
-68%
11.2
-195%
7.9
-108%
3.35
12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
2.6
-37%
3.8
-100%
4
-111%
2.7
-42%
2.8
-47%
1.34
29%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.35 94%
2.39 92%
2.3 96%
2.09 105%
2.53 87%
2.12 104%
CCT
6502 100%
6477 100%
7438 87%
6527 100%
6076 107%
6589 99%
6441 101%
Contrast
688
1120
1513
883
1142

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
45549 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
75533 Points +66%
Huawei Nova
63206 Points +39%
HTC One A9s
51330 Points +13%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
122513 Points +169%
Wiko U Feel Prime
44420 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
35964 Points -21%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
682 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1204 Points +77%
Huawei Nova
840 Points +23%
HTC One A9s
711 Points +4%
Wiko U Feel Prime
644 Points -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3292 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
2511 Points -24%
Huawei Nova
2984 Points -9%
HTC One A9s
2936 Points -11%
Wiko U Feel Prime
2085 Points -37%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
8550 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
18127 Points +112%
HTC One A9s
10766 Points +26%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29241 Points +242%
Wiko U Feel Prime
9548 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7229 Points -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7793 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
21668 Points +178%
HTC One A9s
10453 Points +34%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
32997 Points +323%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
6522 Points -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12954 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
11532 Points -11%
HTC One A9s
12025 Points -7%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
20910 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11653 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
490 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1342 Points +174%
Huawei Nova
849 Points +73%
HTC One A9s
603 Points +23%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3302 Points +574%
Wiko U Feel Prime
584 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
281 Points -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
407 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1252 Points +208%
Huawei Nova
737 Points +81%
HTC One A9s
524 Points +29%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4506 Points +1007%
Wiko U Feel Prime
514 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
235 Points -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1699 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1793 Points +6%
Huawei Nova
1821 Points +7%
HTC One A9s
1269 Points -25%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1706 Points 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1118 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
916 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
312 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
856 Points +174%
Huawei Nova
473 Points +52%
HTC One A9s
425 Points +36%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2419 Points +675%
Wiko U Feel Prime
301 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
253 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
745 Points +194%
Huawei Nova
391 Points +55%
HTC One A9s
359 Points +42%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2792 Points +1004%
Wiko U Feel Prime
250 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1670 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1800 Points +8%
Huawei Nova
1802 Points +8%
HTC One A9s
1175 Points -30%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1648 Points -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1034 Points -38%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
19 fps
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
31 fps +63%
Huawei Nova
22 fps +16%
HTC One A9s
27 fps +42%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
60 fps +216%
Wiko U Feel Prime
16 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
20 fps +5%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12 fps
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
30 fps +150%
Huawei Nova
23 fps +92%
HTC One A9s
18 fps +50%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
91 fps +658%
Wiko U Feel Prime
17 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
12 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9.8 fps
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
14 fps +43%
Huawei Nova
10 fps +2%
HTC One A9s
14 fps +43%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
43 fps +339%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.5 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
8.4 fps -14%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5 fps
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
14 fps +180%
Huawei Nova
9.8 fps +96%
HTC One A9s
7.2 fps +44%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
44 fps +780%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.1 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4.1 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7.3 fps
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
9.4 fps +29%
Huawei Nova
6.6 fps -10%
HTC One A9s
11 fps +51%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
29 fps +297%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.8 fps -34%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.2 fps
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
9.6 fps +200%
Huawei Nova
6.2 fps +94%
HTC One A9s
2.6 fps -19%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
30 fps +838%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.4 fps +38%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5000 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
4964 Points -1%
Huawei Nova
4596 Points -8%
HTC One A9s
3350 Points -33%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
6969 Points +39%
Wiko U Feel Prime
3347 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4051 Points -19%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1000 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1297 Points +30%
Huawei Nova
1264 Points +26%
HTC One A9s
Points -100%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2290 Points +129%
Wiko U Feel Prime
290 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
662 Points -34%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2185 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
2582 Points +18%
Huawei Nova
2280 Points +4%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
2986 Points +37%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1281 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
1380 Points -37%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1296 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
798 Points -38%
Huawei Nova
1531 Points +18%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1983 Points +53%
Wiko U Feel Prime
774 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
443 Points -66%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
529 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1635 Points +209%
Huawei Nova
1006 Points +90%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
4335 Points +719%
Wiko U Feel Prime
740 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
415 Points -22%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
666 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
843 Points +27%
Huawei Nova
727 Points +9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
1071 Points +61%
Wiko U Feel Prime
10 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
756 Points +14%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One A9s Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3799 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
9138 Points +141%
Huawei Nova
4717 Points +24%
HTC One A9s
4395 Points +16%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
8436 Points +122%
Wiko U Feel Prime
3383 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
3566 Points -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9669 ms *
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
3465 ms * +64%
Huawei Nova
8235 ms * +15%
HTC One A9s
9346 ms * +3%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3290 ms * +66%
Wiko U Feel Prime
10826 ms * -12%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11796 ms * -22%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
64 Points
Huawei Nova
60 Points -6%
HTC One A9s
69 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
64 Points 0%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
23.28 Points
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
50.1 Points +115%
Huawei Nova
30.49 Points +31%
HTC One A9s
27.48 Points +18%
Lenovo ZUK Z2
51.7 Points +122%
Wiko U Feel Prime
21.4 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
22.1 Points -5%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo ZUK Z2
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
20%
87%
35%
-6%
51%
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB
199.7
228.4
14%
248.3
24%
210.2
5%
239.4
20%
270.9
36%
168.8
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
45.96
47.03
2%
75
63%
68.6
49%
46.52
1%
137.3
199%
27.27
-41%
Random Read 4KB
22.32
36.85
65%
38.19
71%
21.3
-5%
21.27
-5%
55
146%
21.92
-2%
Random Write 4KB
9.62
12.44
29%
44.63
364%
34.6
260%
5.64
-41%
9.4
-2%
10.27
7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.5
73.2
-3%
79.5
5%
39.6
-48%
41.98
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
50.1
54.9
10%
47.69
-5%
25.6
-49%
35.21
-30%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high23 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high52 fps
Max. Load
 30.4 °C31.3 °C30.3 °C 
 31.7 °C31.7 °C31.8 °C 
 31.6 °C31.8 °C31.2 °C 
Maximum: 31.8 °C
Average: 31.3 °C
28.9 °C30.3 °C30.8 °C
30 °C31.9 °C32 °C
30.6 °C31.6 °C31.8 °C
Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 30.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.62525.431.53125.331.74032.931.15033.627.16331.631.58028.429.31002729.812520.832.61602240.820021.344.725020.85031521.254.440019.461.250019.564.663017.769.380017.972.7100017.875.5125017.372.8160017.472.4200016.771250017.272.1315018.272.8400017.969.1500017.663.7630017.760.5800017.856.71000017.959.71250018.1501600018.245.6SPL3082.6N1.351.2median 17.9median 61.2Delta1.41135.934.435.735.931.532.832.431.529.928.927.529.928.430.527.528.433.43735.433.432.133.629.732.130.229.129.230.224.625.725.324.624.822.824.124.826.723.12326.741.122.623.141.148.626.518.548.654.231.920.554.25735.118.7576540.918.16569.846.318.269.873.45219.173.470.753.21770.768.553.917.368.569.850.217.469.871.146.817.571.171.950.617.371.975.552.817.275.572.149.817.272.171.65017.271.675.952.617.675.976.152.217.776.169.245.717.869.261.336.31861.358.134.617.958.184.462.829.984.460.515.91.360.5median 69.2median 46.3median 17.9median 69.29.6111.69.627.628.827.626.626.426.625.726.325.727.725.127.727.924.827.922.825.422.824.223.224.227.123.527.136.930.936.935.12035.141.519.941.546.921.746.953.124.253.15521.25556.421.156.457.617.957.659.32059.362.520.462.567.918.167.968.414.868.470.51670.572.914.972.974.814.474.875.213.975.272.213.372.267.912.867.968.812.968.858.312.958.350.613.250.644.912.844.982.629.282.648.71.248.7median 58.3median 17.9median 58.310.83.710.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A3 2017Samsung Galaxy A3 2016HTC One A9s
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC One A9s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.07 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.37 / 0.78 / 0.84 Watt
Load midlight 1.52 / 2.75 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
3200 mAh
Huawei Nova
3020 mAh
HTC One A9s
2300 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
2300 mAh
Power Consumption
-137%
-111%
-185%
-193%
-94%
-82%
Idle Minimum *
0.37
0.87
-135%
0.61
-65%
1.29
-249%
1.31
-254%
0.66
-78%
0.96
-159%
Idle Average *
0.78
1.33
-71%
1.83
-135%
2.28
-192%
2.03
-160%
1.66
-113%
1.39
-78%
Idle Maximum *
0.84
1.35
-61%
1.86
-121%
2.52
-200%
2.08
-148%
1.76
-110%
1.45
-73%
Load Average *
1.52
5.44
-258%
3.71
-144%
4.06
-167%
5.45
-259%
2.85
-88%
2.65
-74%
Load Maximum *
2.75
7.11
-159%
5.19
-89%
5.91
-115%
6.75
-145%
5.01
-82%
3.51
-28%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
47h 42min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
8h 52min
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
3200 mAh
Huawei Nova
3020 mAh
HTC One A9s
2300 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
2300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-25%
-17%
-41%
-18%
-35%
-20%
Reader / Idle
2862
1870
-35%
1543
-46%
1254
-56%
1978
-31%
H.264
988
717
-27%
587
-41%
863
-13%
WiFi v1.3
668
504
-25%
873
31%
517
-23%
546
-18%
575
-14%
628
-6%
Load
532
328
-38%
245
-54%
376
-29%

Pros

+ 高品质的做工
+ 防水防尘(IP68)
+ 带USB-OTG的USB Type-C接口
+ LTE,NFC,802.11 ac Wi-Fi
+ 非常明亮的调整好的AMOLED显示屏
+ 优秀的相机
+ 优秀的性能
+ 保持冰凉
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 非常好的电池续航

Cons

- 手机背面太滑
- 只有LTE Cat. 4
- 无移动高清链接(MHL)
- 没有双SIM卡
- 没有光学防抖
- 屏幕闪烁
In review: Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017). Review unit courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017). Review unit courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

对于已经拥有去年的 Galaxy A3 (2016)的用户来说,几乎没有升级的必要。它们具有类似的质量。当然,今年的新机型确实有一些优势。

首先,Galaxy A32017)现在是IP68级别防尘防水。另外,它具有USB Type-C端口,相机不再从背面突出。由于取消了先前的银色框架,机子看起来显得更加坚固,而且它运行的是最新的Android 6.0.1操作系统。

将处理器升级到更快的Exynos 7870确实对整体性能达到预期的影响。电池续航的改善更重要:由于其惊人的电源效率,Galaxy A32017)是一款非常耐用的机器。两个摄像头也得到了改善,在低光条件下拍摄效果更好。前置摄像头已经完成从500800万像素的更新。

Galaxy A32017)并没有做出大跃进,相反,它的迭代与改进是温和有效的。

尽管4.7英寸大小易于掌控,但光滑的背面可能会引起一些用户的不满。你唯一可以做的就是去体验一下,判断手机是否太滑。作为个人,我不介意玻璃后盖。然而,该手机的缺点无法被掩饰:没有高清影音标准接口,没有双SIM卡支持,没有光学防抖。有些用户还可能会注意到亮度低于92%时的屏幕闪烁。尽管有这些限制,Galaxy A32017)仍然是一个质量坚实而让人尊敬的中档智能手机,很少有值得抱怨的地方。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里 


Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 - 09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
93%
Battery
89%
Display
91%
Games Performance
4 / 64 → 6%
Application Performance
38 / 86 → 44%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Camera
54%
Average
71%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy A3 (2017) 智能手机简短评测
Manuel Masiero, 2017-04- 9 (Update: 2017-04-17)