Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy M15 5G 智能手机评测--AMOLED、广角摄像头和超大电池,售价不到 200 美元

迪斯科球和长跑运动员 三星Galaxy M15 5G 是一款经济实惠的中端智能手机,配备大容量电池和 AMOLED 屏幕,只能在网上购买。它是否足以与其他廉价手机区分开来?
Android ARM 5G Smartphone
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 396 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.3 x 160.1 x 76.8
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.781W/​kg Head, 1.191W/​kg Body , fanless
Weight
217 g
Price
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price from
Best Price
72 %v8
07/2024
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2
217 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2340x1080
80.1 %v7 (old)
03/2024
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2
200 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2340x1080
75.8 %v8
06/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2
174.5 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
78.8 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Motorola Moto G24
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
181 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.56"1612x720
77 %v7 (old)
05/2024
HMD Pulse Pro
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
196 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.65"1612x720

外壳和连接 - 包括 NFC

三星的Galaxy M 系列仅在网上销售,而且似乎被制造商忽略了一点,因为在美国等一些三星网站上,甚至没有列出最新的设备。不过,你至少可以从其他各种在线零售商那里订购这些产品,其中包括我们今天要讨论的Galaxy M 15 5G。如果您期待的是 Galaxy A15 5G那么你就大错特错了--当然,这其中也有一些相似之处。

这两款手机的宽度和长度完全相同,而三星Galaxy M15 5G 则因为配备了更大的电池而略厚一些。这也增加了一点额外的重量--217 克,是本次对比中最重的手机。即便如此,它仍然给人一种舒适的握持感。

它的边缘非常圆润,设计也非常美观。背面和边框有浅蓝、深蓝和灰色三种颜色。背面很光滑,但透明表层下面有一个图案,可以折射光线,让人联想到迪斯科球。

表壳不具备防水和防尘功能。不过,它的结构还是不错的,用一般的力量是无法扭动它的,也不会发出任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音。不过,你可以感觉到背面和边框之间的材料过渡非常轻微。

这款手机有两个版本:一个配备 4GB 内存和 128GB 存储空间,另一个配备 6GB 内存。NFC 功能可让您使用智能手机进行移动支付。如果你喜欢使用模拟耳机,那么你可以期待它的 3.5 毫米插孔。

遗憾的是,这款手机不支持 eSIM 卡,如果您想插入 microSD 卡,就必须放弃两个 SIM 卡插槽中的一个。在我们使用 Angelbird V60 作为参考卡进行的测试中,microSD 读卡器的速度达到了同类产品的平均水平。因此,数据传输速度还算可以。

尺寸比较

163.2 mm 75 mm 8.6 mm 196 g163.5 mm 74.5 mm 8 mm 181 g160.1 mm 76.8 mm 9.3 mm 217 g161.1 mm 75 mm 7.6 mm 174.5 g160.1 mm 76.8 mm 8.4 mm 200 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
48.7 MB/s +30%
HMD Pulse Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
38.5 MB/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
37.4 MB/s
Motorola Moto G24
  (Angelbird V60)
36.9 MB/s -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
  (Angelbird AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60)
36.2 MB/s -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=87, last 2 years)
28.7 MB/s -23%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø40.5 (27.2-50.6)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.4 (26.3-44.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø40.2 (26.4-48.9)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.7 (22.9-43.6)
HMD Pulse Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60Angelbird V60: Ø37.1 (27.3-46.6)
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø72.6 (44.3-77.8)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.1 (32-79.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø66.2 (29.9-74.6)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.5 (33-81.7)
HMD Pulse Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.4 (37-83.3)

通信、软件、可持续性和运行

三星Galaxy M15 5G 配备了 WiFi 5,在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中,它实现了非常稳定的数据吞吐率,这在该技术中是很常见的:我们注意到的数值约为 350 MBit/s。虽然这还不足以使用千兆互联网线路,但您仍然可以快速传输数据。

Galaxy M15 是一款 5G 手机,它还支持当前最快的移动通信标准的许多频率。这意味着您应该能够在许多国家连接到 5G 或 4G 网络。不过,Galaxy M15 并不是一款真正的全球通用手机,所以如果你想在本地使用移动互联网,应该在旅行前对此进行研究。

三星的 OneUI 6.1 预装了基于Android 14 的操作系统。制造商在很多方面都走了自己的路线,因此习惯了原版Android 的用户可能需要一段时间才能适应。总的来说,该操作系统非常现代,而且易于使用。我们喜欢制造商承诺的 4 年新操作系统版本和长达 5 年的安全补丁。这也对我们的可持续发展评级产生了积极影响。

说到可持续发展:三星表示,该手机在生产过程中产生的二氧化碳当量为 33.9 千克,这是一个相对较低的数值,因此也是一个很好的数值。由于不含充电器,包装更小、更轻,因此在运输过程中产生的排放量更少。包装盒采用大豆油墨印刷,三星不再使用塑料包装。

得益于 90 Hz 的屏幕,手机对输入的响应速度非常快,触摸屏对边角和边缘非常敏感。如果要使用指纹解锁智能手机,则需要将手指放在待机键上,因为传感器就隐藏在这里。保存指纹后,手机就能快速、可靠地解锁。也可以使用面部识别解锁,效果同样可靠。在黑暗环境中,屏幕亮度通常足以实现识别。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
349 (min: 273) MBit/s ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
341 (min: 324) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
317 (min: 290) MBit/s ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
355 (min: 299) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
367 (min: 361) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G24
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
352 (min: 295) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
319 (min: 294) MBit/s ∼87%
HMD Pulse Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
352 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
319 (min: 238) MBit/s ∼87%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (273-358)
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (348-394)

相机 - 即使是广角镜头

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

我们测试设备的摄像系统采用了 Galaxy A15 5G.这并不是一个糟糕的选择,因为用户可以获得广角摄像头,这在这个价位的手机中是非常罕见的。虽然它的分辨率只有 500 万像素,拍出的照片也不是最清晰的,但它仍然极大地扩展了相机系统的灵活性。

它的主摄像头具有 5000 万像素的分辨率,虽然按照标准,它只能拍摄 1250 万像素的照片,但却有更高的感光度。如果您想使用镜头的全分辨率,可以通过相机软件选择特殊模式。植物的照片看起来相当不错,而我们周围环境的照片则略带蓝色。整体细节水平一般。在弱光条件下,主摄像头能很好地照亮照片,但照片中的光源往往曝光过度。

使用主摄像头可以录制 1080p 和 30 fps 的视频。这在这个价位的产品中很常见,但录制的视频看起来有些生涩,尤其是在快速移动的情况下。灯光调节和自动对焦有时也有点慢。

第三个摄像头是一个微距镜头,分辨率很低。它适合拍摄快照,但不应该将图像放大太多,因为这样只能大致显示细节。

手机正面有一个 1300 万像素的自拍摄像头。它能拍摄出相当不错的照片。不过,您不应该过分放大这些照片,而且在较暗的区域会缺乏细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightUltra-wide-angle camera
ColorChecker
5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M15 5G: 6.06 ∆E min: 1.84 - max: 11.19 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.7 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
62 ∆E
54 ∆E
37 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
46.2 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy M15 5G: 47.44 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 94.34 ∆E

显示屏 - 面向大众的 AMOLED

由于小米和三星的出现,OLED 显示屏现在也可以在相对便宜的智能手机中找到。Galaxy M15 5G 也不例外,但其 6.5 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏比其他制造商生产的手机略小。在测试过程中,我们测得显示全白屏幕时的最大亮度为 680 cd/m²。在显示较小区域时,我们测得的亮度高达 768 cd/m²,与制造商提供的最大值基本一致。

这是一款 90 赫兹的显示屏,如果需要降低功耗,可将其频率降至 60 赫兹,但不可能降低每秒帧数。在使用光谱光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行测量时,我们注意到色彩还原相对精确,肉眼无法看到与色彩空间参考值之间的差异。

我们测得 PWM 闪烁频率约为 360 Hz,振幅约为 15%。因此,如果您过去对闪烁显示器比较敏感,那么在购买该设备之前应该先试用一下。

682
cd/m²
677
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
678
cd/m²
677
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
677
cd/m²
678
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 683 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 679 cd/m² Minimum: 1.95 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 678 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
141.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.466
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G24
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"
HMD Pulse Pro
IPS, 1612x720, 6.7"
Response Times
26%
28%
-312%
-373%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.8 ?(1.5, 12.3)
1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8)
88%
1.13 ?(0.57, 0.56)
92%
36 ?(19.9, 16.1)
-161%
35.7 ?(18.8, 16.9)
-159%
Response Time Black / White *
3.8 ?(1.6, 2.2)
1.3 ?(0.6, 0.7)
66%
1.55 ?(0.9, 0.65)
59%
21.4 ?(13, 8.4)
-463%
26.1 ?(12.7, 13.4)
-587%
PWM Frequency
359
90
-75%
120 ?(100)
-67%
Screen
5%
29%
-67%
-84%
Brightness middle
678
705
4%
958
41%
521
-23%
501
-26%
Brightness
679
701
3%
965
42%
510
-25%
470
-31%
Brightness Distribution
99
96
-3%
83
-16%
93
-6%
89
-10%
Black Level *
0.39
0.17
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.96
1.88
4%
1.43
27%
4.83
-146%
5.21
-166%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.61
4.57
-27%
2.51
30%
7.71
-114%
8.79
-143%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
1.5
46%
1.4
50%
5.3
-89%
6.3
-125%
Gamma
2.466 89%
2.116 104%
2.33 94%
2.111 104%
2.297 96%
CCT
6955 93%
6501 100%
6476 100%
7021 93%
8524 76%
Contrast
1336
2947
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 12%
29% / 29%
-190% / -128%
-229% / -156%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 2.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 12.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 359 Hz
Amplitude: 15 %

The display backlight flickers at 359 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 359 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池 - 动力充足

三星采用了该价位常见的 SoC,即 联发科 Dimensity 6100+它的性能相对较好。即便如此,在简单的日常使用中,你还是无法避免掉帧或长时间等待的情况。

你也不应对它的图形性能抱太高的期望。不过,如果降低细节设置,大多数手机游戏都能正常运行。当涉及到人工智能计算时,你可能应该选择不同的 SoC,因为 Dimensity 6100+只能提供基本功能,而且速度并不快。

虽然在长期负载的情况下,你会感觉到它的外壳发热--我们测得的温度高达 43.8°C--但这并不是问题。在 3DMark 的长期基准测试中,我们没有发现任何节流现象。

底部边缘的单声道扬声器可提供清晰的声音重现和适当的音量。即使在高音量下,扬声器也不会失真。不过,由于缺乏中低音,音乐和电影音效听起来总是有些乏力。对于喜欢连接耳机或扬声器的用户,可使用 3.5 毫米插孔连接或蓝牙 5.3。无线播放只支持最基本的音频编解码器:三星自己的 SSC 以及 SBC、aptX、LDAC 和 AAC。

Galaxy M15 5G 电池容量为 6,000 毫安时,比该价位手机通常多出约 1,000 毫安时。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,它的续航时间达到了 19:04 小时,即使正常使用两天也不成问题。其强大的电池充电功率可达 25 瓦,最长需要 2:45 小时。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=142, last 2 years)
1379 Points +97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
769 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
699 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (678 - 699, n=5)
692 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
690 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
411 Points -41%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
376 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=142, last 2 years)
3850 Points +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1991 Points +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1814 - 1944, n=5)
1879 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1866 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1814 Points -3%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1324 Points -29%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1251 Points -33%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2138, n=188, last 2 years)
955 Points +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
593 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
538 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
530 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (517 - 538, n=5)
527 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
341 Points -36%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
307 Points -42%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=188, last 2 years)
3179 Points +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1943 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1780 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1740 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1589 - 1780, n=5)
1689 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1337 Points -23%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1270 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=194, last 2 years)
12435 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10567 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
9403 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9078 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9018 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (8482 - 9078, n=5)
8841 Points -3%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
8059 Points -11%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=169, last 2 years)
7411 Points +198%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2818 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2502 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2468 - 2503, n=5)
2488 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2487 Points
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1453 Points -42%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
977 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=168, last 2 years)
10844 Points +365%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2615 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2336 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2330 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2281 - 2344, n=5)
2321 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1278 Points -45%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
829 Points -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=168, last 2 years)
4471 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3873 Points +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (3258 - 3459, n=5)
3330 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3327 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3258 Points
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
2793 Points -14%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2608 Points -20%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (404 - 13896, n=120, last 2 years)
2818 Points +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1330 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1228 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1222 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1186 - 1230, n=5)
1219 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
730 Points -40%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
426 Points -65%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (403 - 20068, n=186, last 2 years)
7021 Points +482%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1316 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1207 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1204 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (1174 - 1208, n=5)
1200 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
726 Points -40%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
422 Points -65%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5226, n=190, last 2 years)
1877 Points +471%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
368 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
336 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (328 - 338, n=5)
332 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
329 Points
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
187 Points -43%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
117 Points -64%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 5248, n=187, last 2 years)
1879 Points +482%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
360 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
325 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (319 - 330, n=5)
325 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
323 Points
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
182 Points -44%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
113 Points -65%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=206, last 2 years)
46.7 fps +234%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
14 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (13 - 14, n=5)
13.4 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps -7%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
10 fps -29%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=206, last 2 years)
72.6 fps +384%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (15 - 15, n=5)
15 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
8.8 fps -41%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
5.5 fps -63%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=206, last 2 years)
35 fps +302%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.9 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.6 fps -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (8.4 - 8.7, n=5)
8.54 fps -2%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
7.4 fps -15%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
0.85 fps -90%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=206, last 2 years)
29 fps +409%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.9 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.7 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.7 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (5.7 - 5.7, n=5)
5.7 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
3.3 fps -42%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2 fps -65%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 42, n=205, last 2 years)
13.7 fps +471%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
6.6 fps +175%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2.5 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.4 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.4 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (2.3 - 2.4, n=5)
2.38 fps -1%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1.5 fps -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 89112, n=207, last 2 years)
35057 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
22638 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (21764 - 22638, n=5)
22293 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
22145 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
21764 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
14717 Points -35%
HMD Pulse Pro
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
12195 Points -46%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +134%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (277 - 293, n=2)
285 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
277 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points +321%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
201 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
177 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (173 - 177, n=2)
175 Points -1%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points +115%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
393 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
384 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
  (381 - 384, n=2)
383 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy M15 5GSamsung Galaxy A15 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GMotorola Moto G24HMD Pulse ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
36%
-50%
48%
11%
126%
Sequential Read 256KB
492.2
499.6
2%
951.97
93%
291.9
-41%
966
96%
Sequential Write 256KB
493.7
498.1
1%
503.79
2%
252
-49%
824
67%
Random Read 4KB
198.3
194
-2%
243.8
23%
86.3
-56%
205
3%
190.1 ?(89.3 - 297, n=69)
-4%
Random Write 4KB
189.9
223.5
18%
240.36
27%
90.9
-52%
239
26%
183.3 ?(62.6 - 419, n=69)
-3%

温度

Max. Load
 42.3 °C37.6 °C35.4 °C 
 43.8 °C36.8 °C35.2 °C 
 42.9 °C37.5 °C34.9 °C 
Maximum: 43.8 °C
Average: 38.5 °C
33.1 °C37.6 °C41.6 °C
33.8 °C39 °C43.6 °C
33.2 °C38 °C43.6 °C
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

012345678Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.02 (1.981-2.04)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.04)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.22 (2.21-2.22)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.128 (1.121-1.139)
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.33 (7.16-7.36)
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.34 (7.3-7.35)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.98 (7.96-8.01)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.39 (4.36-4.41)
HMD Pulse Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.56 (2.55-2.58)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.839.52534.835.23129.6284031.432.65036.636.76325.325.48018.423.510018.9221251629.116014.538.420018.842.525014.346.63151053.540010.460.550010.663.26309.862.88001168.4100013.971.1125010.271.5160010.271.5200010.471.8250011.169.9315011.972.8400012.576.4500013.37463001476800014.877.81000015.4671250016.265.4160001760SPL24.885N0.661.4median 13.3median 67Delta2.69.543.738.933.232.129.326.432.331.440.735.632.626.319.718.616.917.615.518.913.330.79.633.611.835.69.237.88.7451153.113.257.813.761.914.867.113.77010.672.710.97212.368.913.765.213.663.613.968.114.467.815.660.515.959.21654.916.744.925.879.90.741.1median 13.7median 59.22.113.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy M15 5GHMD Pulse Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HMD Pulse Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

运行时间

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Samsung Galaxy M15 5G
6000 mAh
1144 min
Motorola Moto G24
5000 mAh
969 min -15%
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
5000 mAh
965 min -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years)
956 min -16%
HMD Pulse Pro
5000 mAh
899 min -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
5000 mAh
801 min -30%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
19h 04min

Pros

+ 5G 就绪
+ 运行时间长
+ 配备广角镜头的摄像系统
+ 明亮且色彩准确的 AMOLED
+ 长期更新承诺
+ 负载情况下不节流

Cons

- 比同类智能手机重
- 蓝牙音频编解码器数量少
- PWM 闪烁
- 不支持 eSIM

评语:三星为我们带来了实实在在的优惠

三星Galaxy M15 5G 评测
三星Galaxy M15 5G 评测

三星Galaxy M15 5G 价格低廉,整体性能相当不错:它支持 5G、配备明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏、大容量电池和广角摄像头,而这些在这个价位的手机中都不常见。

这款手机结构合理,背面的反光效果也很吸引人。在软件更新方面,三星提供了精彩的 4 个操作系统版本和 5 年的安全补丁,而一些高端设备甚至没有这么多。

它的电池续航能力很强,扬声器的音量也相当大,照相系统的质量也不错--尽管由于手机价格低廉,你可能仍然不得不降低对它的期望值。

不过,由于该手机的电池容量较大,机身略厚,因此重量略重。它的处理器无法创造奇迹,偶尔会出现故障。

如果你想以低廉的价格获得最多的功能,那么三星Galaxy M15 5G 是一个不错的选择。

XiaomiRedmi Note 13 5G 的配置同样不错。如果您想减轻一些重量,那么不妨仔细看看三星Galaxy A15 5G

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时,三星Galaxy M15 5G 尚未在美国发售。其 MRSP 略低于 200 美元。

请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

Samsung Galaxy M15 5G - 07/17/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
79%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
40 / 69 → 57%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
87%
Games Performance
5 / 55 → 9%
Application Performance
54 / 85 → 64%
AI Performance
18%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
58%
Average
64%
72%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
91.1%
Materials
15%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
85%
Total Sustainability Score: 57.7%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy M15 5G 智能手机评测--AMOLED、广角摄像头和超大电池,售价不到 200 美元
Florian Schmitt, 2024-07-18 (Update: 2024-07-18)