Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 13 5G 智能手机评测:120赫兹AMOLED和108MP摄像头,售价不到2万英镑(200欧元)

廉价的 5G 刺激,没有华而不实的东西。

小米Redmi Note 13 5G 是一款搭载联发科 Dimensity 6080 SoC 的全面设备,提供了包括 5G、120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏和 108 MP 三摄在内的大量现代智能手机功能,售价为 18999 ₹ (210 欧元)。虽然 Note 13 5G 的体验基本上是正面的,但很明显,小米不得不在定价上少走弯路。
5G ARM Android Smartphone
小米Redmi Note 13 5G 评测

小米最近推出了广受欢迎的Redmi Note 系列的升级版。此前,我们曾评测过 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5GRedmi Note 13 Pro 5G13 Pro+ 5G 和 13 Pro 5G,现在我们将目光转向入门级机型Redmi Note 13 5G,也称为Redmi Note 13 Classic 5G。

Redmi Note 13 5G 配备了 联发科 Dimensity 6080SoC 芯片。该机配备了 8GB LPDDR4x 内存和 256GB UFS 2.2 存储空间,并采用了极具吸引力的北极白色机身。

这款智能手机与 Redmi Note 13 4G有很多共同点,都采用了 高通骁龙 685但由于增加了对 5G 的支持,因此售价略高,为 18,999 ₹(242 美元或 210 欧元)。

在这篇评测中,我们将对Redmi Note 13 5G 进行深入了解,看看它能否在这一竞争激烈的细分市场中取得胜利。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Redmi Note 13 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x-2133 Dual-channel
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 228.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm jack, USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gravity, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Rotation, Orientation, Step Counter
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G: GSM: Bands 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, 3G: WCDMA: Bands 1/2/4/5/6/8/19, 4G: LTE FDD: Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/66, 4G: LTE TDD: Bands 38/40/41 5G SA/NSA: Bands n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 161.1 x 75
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix Samsung HM6 (f/1.7, Wide angle, 1/1.67", 0.64 µm), + 8 MP OmniVision OV08 (f/2.2, Ultra-wide, 1/4.4", 1 µm) + 2 MP SmartSens SC202 (f/2.4, Depth, 1/5.1", 1.75 µm), LED flash, 1080p 30 fps, HDR, PDAF, EIS: No, OIS: No, Camera2API Support: LEVEL_3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix GalaxyCore GC16 (f/2.4, 1/3", 1.0 µm, 24mm) PDAF, 1080p 30fps
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, Protective case, 33 W Power Adapter, USB Type-A to Type-C cable, Pre-applied screen protector, SIM tray ejector tool, MIUI 14 upgradable to HyperOS, IP54,SAR (India): 1.6 W/kg (1 g limit); 0.854 W/Kg (Head); 0.710 W/Kg (Body), Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
174.5 g
Price
280 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
75.8 %
06 / 2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2
174.5 g7.6 mm6.67"2400x1080
81.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g7.9 mm6.78"2436x1080
80.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610
188.5 g8 mm6.67"2400x1080
85.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5
209 g8.2 mm6.60"2340x1080
80.5 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g8.75 mm6.60"2400x1080
81.4 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g8.3 mm6.72"2400x1080
80.7 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Motorola Moto G54
Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256
177 g8 mm6.50"2400x1080

结构:显示屏边框明显比Redmi Note 12 更纤薄

就其售价而言,Redmi Note 13 5G 的整体制造质量几乎无可挑剔。其设计借鉴了 Redmi Note 12 5G但突出的变化包括四边的超薄边框和平坦的背板。

机身结构以塑料为主,显示屏由康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。

虽然预装了屏幕保护膜,但如果把手机和其他物品一起放在口袋里,保护膜可能会开始起泡或受到轻微损坏。尽管背板和边框采用了塑料结构,但 Note 13 并没有显示出结构上的弱点。

由于 174.5 克的重量分布合理,没有任何尖角,长时间握持手机感觉相当舒适。

此外,Redmi Note 13 的防尘防水等级为 IP54。

尺寸比较

165.5 mm 76 mm 8.3 mm 195 g165.5 mm 76.1 mm 7.9 mm 195 g163.56 mm 75.78 mm 8.75 mm 195 g162.2 mm 75.6 mm 8 mm 188.5 g161.7 mm 78 mm 8.2 mm 209 g161.6 mm 73.8 mm 8 mm 177 g161.1 mm 75 mm 7.6 mm 174.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

硬件:内置耳机插孔、红外爆破器和 microSD 扩展器

Redmi Note 13 5G 配备了 8 GB LPDDR4x-2133 内存和 256 GB UFS 2.2 存储空间。此外,还有入门级的 6 GB + 128 GB 版本和高端的 12 GB + 256 GB 版本。

下面将详细介绍这款智能手机的侧面特征。听筒不具备扬声器功能。

SIM 卡托盘可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡或一张 nano SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡。SIM 卡托的质量不是很好,感觉很脆弱。不支持 eSIM 卡。

左:SIM 卡和 microSD 卡托盘
左:SIM 卡和 microSD 卡托盘
右侧音量摇杆、带集成指纹识别器的电源开关
右侧音量摇杆、带集成指纹识别器的电源开关
顶部:耳机插孔、红外爆破器、麦克风
顶部:耳机插孔、红外爆破器、麦克风
底部扬声器、USB 2.0 Type-C、麦克风
底部扬声器、USB 2.0 Type-C、麦克风

microSD 读卡器

Redmi Note 13 5G的microSD读卡器与Tecno Pova 6 Pro的读卡器性能相似。 Tecno Pova 6 Pro摩托罗拉 Moto G54.我们还发现它的速度明显快于 Redmi Note 13 4GPoco M4 Pro.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
55.32 MB/s +53%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (Angelbird V60)
36.6 MB/s +1%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (Angelbird V60)
36.2 MB/s 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (Angelbird AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60)
36.2 MB/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=81, last 2 years)
29.5 MB/s -19%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (Angelbird V60)
24.6 MB/s -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s -33%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s -57%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø66.2 (29.9-74.6)
Tecno Pova 6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.6 (15.1-85.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (18.4-82.5)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.4 (38.1-99.5)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.5 (58.6-78.9)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.6 (26.9-79.1)
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.9 (29.9-78.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø40.2 (26.4-48.9)
Tecno Pova 6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø42.9 (28.8-52.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø26.5 (17.2-40)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.8 (25.4-57.9)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (25-46.5)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37 (28.7-44.4)
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.3 (21.6-47.4)

软件:入门级 Note 13 采用小米 HyperOS

Redmi Note 13 5G 最初搭载的是基于Android 13 的 MIUI 14,但现在可以升级到基于Android 14 的小米 HyperOS。在撰写本评测时,安全补丁是截至 2024 年 3 月的最新版本。

HyperOS 与 MIUI 并无本质区别,大多数用户也不会觉得它与 MIUI 14 有什么不同。大部分改动都在引擎盖下,以确保与小米 "人 x 车 x 家 "生态系统中的其他产品实现有效的交叉功能。

值得注意的变化包括微妙地修改了应用程序图标和快捷菜单,重新设计了带有音乐播放功能的控制中心,更轻的安装,新的锁屏样式,对始终在线显示的改进,以及动态岛式的状态栏。

HyperOS 承诺减少臃肿。但在执行原地升级后,所有的臃肿都会从 MIUI 14 延续下来。小米捆绑了自己唠叨的应用商店和一系列预装应用。值得庆幸的是,这些应用都可以卸载,无需使用变通方法。不过,第一方收件箱应用程序偶尔还是会显示一两个广告。

小米的新操作系统在低端硬件上的响应速度应该也不错,但我们在正常使用过程中,尤其是在开机过程中,偶尔还是会遇到卡顿和延迟的情况。

Redmi Note 13 5G 被列为Android 企业推荐 (AER)。HyperOS 提供了一种专门的方法,让设备为企业使用做好准备,这需要从 IT 部门输入所需的凭证。

操作系统更新可保证到Android 15。 Android 16 支持目前尚未确定,但该设备预计到 2027 年 9 月才会达到报废(EOL)状态。

超级操作系统:主屏幕
超级操作系统:主屏幕
控制中心
控制中心
关于电话
关于电话
超级操作系统锁屏选项
应用程序上下文菜单
超级操作系统:应用程序抽屉
多任务视图
超级操作系统:-1 屏幕(应用程序保险库)
原生文件管理器中的广告

通信和全球导航卫星系统:Wi-Fi 5 性能一般,没有 L5 全球定位系统

Redmi Note 13 的内置 Wi-Fi 5 连接远没有打破任何记录。尽管如此,其速度在同价位机型中也算不错了。

虽然不支持 Wi-Fi 6,但我们发现,在距离华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器 1 米的距离内,吞吐量基本稳定,视线清晰。

Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
834 (780min - 913max) MBit/s +135%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years)
725 MBit/s +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (336min - 382max) MBit/s +3%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
361 (337min - 367max) MBit/s +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (269min - 374max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
355 (299min - 364max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=186)
351 MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto G54
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
306 (277min - 341max) MBit/s -14%
Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
830 (758min - 851max) MBit/s +126%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years)
711 MBit/s +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (361min - 375max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G54
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
365 (347min - 383max) MBit/s -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
330 (290min - 348max) MBit/s -10%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=185)
327 MBit/s -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
317 (293min - 339max) MBit/s -14%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
309 (281min - 328max) MBit/s -16%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (299-364)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (780-913)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (361-375)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (758-851)
室内全球导航卫星系统精度
室内全球导航卫星系统精度
户外 GNSS 精确度
户外 GNSS 精确度
支持 GNSS 卫星
支持 GNSS 卫星

Redmi Note 13 5G 支持多个全球导航卫星系统(GNSS),包括 GPS L1 和 GLONASS L1、Galileo E1、BeiDou B1 和 NavIC L1。缺乏 L5 频段支持。

该手机在室内很难捕捉到卫星信号,但在室外则没有问题。

虽然Redmi Note 13 可以很好地处理基本导航功能,但 GPS 跟踪的准确性还有待提高。我们发现,尽管智能手机在空旷的地方兜风,但在穿过建筑物时还是会出现跟踪错误。

Apple iPhone 15 Pro 也很难准确追踪密集建筑物周围的路径,但在障碍物较少的环境中还是相当准确的。

道路导航试驾
道路导航试驾
高密度住宅园区内的导航
高密度住宅园区内的导航
GNSS 对比:Apple iPhone 15 Pro 与Redmi Note 13 5G
GNSS 对比:Apple iPhone 15 Pro 与Redmi Note 13 5G

电话和通话质量:无 VoNR,通话音量不足

Redmi Note 13 5G 支持双卡双待。虽然不支持 eSIM,但可以同时使用两张实体 SIM 卡,前提是不需要使用 microSD 卡。支持 LTE 语音(VoLTE)和 Wi-Fi 通话,但目前的固件还不支持 5G 语音(Vo5G 或 VoNR)。

在 Jio True5G 网络上进行测试时,我们没有遇到任何接收问题。不过,听筒扬声器的音量不够大,只有将音量调到最大后才能清楚地听到对方的声音。

扬声器的通话音量较低时也能听清,而且失真很小。不过,如果周围环境噪音较大,通话还是会被淹没。

Note 13 5G 使用 HyperOS 的默认拨号器,而不是谷歌电话应用程序。拨号器支持原生通话录音、为每次通话添加备注的功能以及集成的联系人管理器。

谷歌信息是默认的短信应用,但如果需要,你也可以切换到 HyperOS 的信息应用。

超级操作系统电话拨号器
超级操作系统电话拨号器
呼叫屏幕
呼叫屏幕
超级操作系统消息应用程序
超级操作系统消息应用程序
呼叫设置
高级呼叫设置
信息设置

摄像头:10800 万像素优质摄像头,无防抖功能

照片模式下的 1600 万像素自拍摄像头
照片模式下的 1600 万像素自拍摄像头
1600 万像素人像模式自拍相机
1600 万像素人像模式自拍相机
主相机微距拍摄
主相机微距拍摄

1600 万像素的前置摄像头能拍出不错的自拍照。虽然拍摄对象的细节表现不错,但背景显得比较暗淡,锐化过度。自拍照在100%裁剪时并不是最细腻的,但对于社交媒体来说,输出效果还是绰绰有余的。

好的一面是,肤色还原相当准确,没有过度饱和。面部毛发等更精细的细节也得到了令人满意的解决。

虽然虚化效果会遮挡脸部周围的头发等特征,但自拍人像的边缘分辨率一般都不错。由于 1600 万像素自拍相机的焦距固定,如果拍摄对象不在最佳范围内,拍摄的照片可能会变得模糊。

虽然没有专用的微距感应器,但主摄像头会在靠近拍摄对象时启动微距模式。微距拍摄效果尚可,但分辨率降低了 200 万像素,即使在明亮的阳光下也会出现大量噪点。

后置 10800 万像素三摄像头,主传感器为三星 HM6,辅以 800 万像素 OmniVision OV08 摄像头。与 OnePlus Nord CE3 的 5000 万像素 IMX890 相比,Redmi Note 13 5G 的主摄像头拍出的照片更流畅,色彩略显暗淡(读起来更自然)。不过,照片整体看起来不错,似乎足以满足社交需求。

Note 13 的 2x 感应器裁剪变焦远优于 Nord CE3 的 2x 模式,能提供更多有用的照片。Nord CE3 在 3 倍传感器裁剪时会损失大量细节,而 Note 13 5G 在 2 倍和 3 倍变焦水平下都能保持相当的细节。

遗憾的是,800 万像素超广角镜头却并非如此。虽然拍摄效果尚可,但放大后会发现拍摄对象周围的细节和边缘明显减少。超广角镜头的色彩显得相当暗淡,传感器也很难分辨画面中更精细的细节。

遗憾的是,前后摄像头的视频捕捉都仅限于 1080p 30 fps,而且只能以 H.264 或 H.265 格式录制。没有提供任何防抖功能。

Redmi Note 13 5G:主摄像头 10 800 万像素
Redmi Note 13 5G:主摄像头 108 MP f/1.7
Redmi Note 13 5G:主摄像头 10 800 万像素
Redmi Note 13 5G:主摄像头 10 800 万像素
Redmi Note 13 5G:主摄像头 10 800 万像素

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main Camera2x Zoom3x ZoomUltra-wide 0.6xLow light

Redmi Note 13 在良好的环境光线下显示出明显的色彩偏差,在 ColorChecker Passport 的叶绿颜色中,Delta E 2000 最大值为 16.5。测试图中的细节再现良好。

然而,在 1 lux 的照度下,相机难以正确对焦,拍摄出的图像颗粒感极强。ColorChecker Passport 的纯白色显示出 56.4 的最大 Delta E 2000 值。在这种情况下,测试图图像几乎无法辨认,而且噪点很多。

ColorChecker
9.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G: 7.92 ∆E min: 1.87 - max: 16.5 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.2 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
34 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
47 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
56.4 ∆E
55.4 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G: 35.91 ∆E min: 12.85 - max: 56.4 ∆E

配件和保修:盒内装有 33 W 充电器

包装盒内附有 33 W 充电器和保护套,屏幕保护膜已预先贴好。
包装盒内附有 33 W 充电器和保护套,屏幕保护膜已预先贴好。

配件包是标准配置,包括以下内容:

  • SIM 卡弹出工具
  • 33 瓦电源适配器
  • USB Type-A 至 Type-C 电源和数据线
  • 预贴屏幕保护膜
  • 手机壳

小米在印度为Redmi Note 13 5G 提供一年的标准保修服务,用户只需支付 1,199 ₹(14 美元)即可选择延长保修一年。

买家还可以在结账时选择一年的小米屏幕保护计划(₹1,199)和小米完整保护计划(₹1,799)。

输入设备和操作:电源开关上的电容式指纹传感器

Note 13 在开机时感觉有些迟缓,但在其他方面运行得相当流畅。大多数情况下,触摸输入都能被识别,没有任何失误或明显的延迟。

震动设置不同,触觉效果也不同。小米提供默认的 Emoji&Font 键盘,但也预装了谷歌的 Gboard。

内置在电源按钮上的电容式指纹识别器为生物识别认证提供了便利。与我们所见过的一些光学显示屏下指纹识别器相比,该传感器能快速注册和识别指纹,而不会造成太大的麻烦。此外,还可选择设置便捷但不太安全的 2D 面部解锁。

小米默认表情符号和字体键盘
小米默认表情符号和字体键盘
键盘选项
键盘选项

显示屏:120 Hz HDR AMOLED,具有快速响应时间和直流调光功能

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

Redmi Note 13 5G 配备了一块 6.67 英寸 FHD+ AMOLED 显示屏,由康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。虽然这不是 LTPO 面板,但屏幕会根据应用程序在 60 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间动态摆动。例如,谷歌地图和 YouTube 等应用程序被锁定为 60 Hz,即使在显示设置中强制设置为 120 Hz。

印度版本提供了 10 位色彩深度,这将有助于实现良好的显示 P3 覆盖率和鲜艳的 HDR 色调。不过,并非所有市场都提供 10 位面板。

小米官方给出的显示屏亮度为 500 尼特,这基本属实。不过,在明亮的环境条件下,Note 13 显示屏的峰值亮度可达 1,000 尼特,我们测得的最大亮度可达 1,070 尼特。Note Redmi Note 13 Pro+Note 13 Pro提供 12 位面板,据称峰值亮度可达 1,800 尼特。

亮度传感器有时会有点小毛病。至少在我们尝试用强光手电筒照射它时,它不会立即对增加的亮度做出反应。

887
cd/m²
921
cd/m²
1068
cd/m²
901
cd/m²
958
cd/m²
1045
cd/m²
902
cd/m²
934
cd/m²
1070
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 1070 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 965.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.65 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 958 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
AMOLED, 2436x1080, 6.8"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.6"
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G54
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Response Times
-3%
42%
-28%
-3235%
-1502%
-1775%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.13 ?(0.57, 0.56)
1.2
-6%
2.2 ?(1.1, 1.1)
-95%
3 ?(1.298, 1.7)
-165%
50 ?(25.6, 24.4)
-4325%
26 ?(15, 11)
-2201%
27.5 ?(14.6, 12.9)
-2334%
Response Time Black / White *
1.55 ?(0.9, 0.65)
1.2
23%
1.6 ?(0.7, 0.9)
-3%
1.831 ?(0.902, 0.929)
-18%
34.8 ?(20.8, 14)
-2145%
14 ?(10, 4)
-803%
20.4 ?(10.6, 9.8)
-1216%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
90
-25%
389.2
224%
240
100%
Screen
-82%
6%
-18%
-91%
-118%
-104%
Brightness middle
958
549
-43%
940
-2%
904
-6%
504
-47%
672
-30%
492
-49%
Brightness
965
548
-43%
922
-4%
912
-5%
499
-48%
656
-32%
470
-51%
Brightness Distribution
83
96
16%
96
16%
97
17%
91
10%
90
8%
90
8%
Black Level *
0.72
0.39
0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.43
3.73
-161%
1.2
16%
2.1
-47%
3.3
-131%
3.88
-171%
3.9
-173%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.51
7.09
-182%
2.28
9%
2.8
-12%
6
-139%
7.89
-214%
6.26
-149%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
2.5
-79%
1.4
-0%
2.2
-57%
4.1
-193%
5.2
-271%
4.3
-207%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.295 96%
2.27 97%
2.1 105%
2.28 96%
2.218 99%
2.275 97%
CCT
6476 100%
6857 95%
6503 100%
6478 100%
7041 92%
7734 84%
7656 85%
Contrast
700
1723
1640
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-43% / -56%
24% / 18%
-23% / -21%
-1663% / -877%
-810% / -464%
-940% / -521%

* ... smaller is better

标准模式,默认色温(目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Note 13 提供三种色彩方案供用户选择:鲜艳、饱和和标准。标准色提供了最准确的色彩,尽管有些暗淡,但涵盖了整个 sRGB 2D 色域,这是由肖像显示器公司的 X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 分光光度计和 Calman Ultimate 色彩校准软件测量得出的结果。

灰度平均值 dE2000:1.4
灰度平均值 dE2000:1.4
sRGB 2D 色域:99.9% 覆盖率
sRGB 2D 色域:99.9% 覆盖率
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000:1.43。最大 dE2000: 2.51
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000:1.43。最大 dE2000: 2.51
饱和扫描 平均 dE2000:1.05。最大 dE2000: 1.95
饱和扫描 平均 dE2000:1.05。最大 dE2000: 1.95

鲜艳模式,默认色温(色彩空间目标:DCI-P3)

Vivid 是默认的色彩方案,但会产生较高的 DeltaE 2000 偏差。在该模式下,我们测得的 DCI-P3 2D 色域覆盖率为 99.3%。

灰度平均值 dE2000:4.5
灰度平均值 dE2000:4.5
DCI-P3 2D 色域:99.3% 覆盖率
DCI-P3 2D 色域:99.3% 覆盖率
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000:3.78。最大 dE2000: 6.76
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000:3.78。最大 dE2000: 6.76
饱和扫描平均 dE2000:3.24。最大 dE2000: 6.8
饱和扫描平均 dE2000:3.24。最大 dE2000: 6.8

鲜艳模式,暖色温(色彩空间目标:DCI-P3)

使用暖色调可将灰度和色彩校验仪的偏差降低到更可接受的水平。

灰度平均值 dE2000:2.6
灰度平均值 dE2000:2.6
DCI-P3 2D 色域:99.4% 覆盖率
DCI-P3 2D 色域:99.4% 覆盖率
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000:2.79。最大 dE2000: 4.23
ColorChecker 平均 dE2000:2.79。最大 dE2000: 4.23
饱和扫描 平均 dE2000:2.1。最大 dE2000:3.81
饱和扫描 平均 dE2000:2.1。最大 dE2000:3.81

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise
↘ 0.65 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.57 ms rise
↘ 0.56 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

100% 黑到 100% 白和 50% 灰到 80% 灰的转换响应时间都很快。该显示器非常适合竞技游戏,不会出现任何鬼影。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 25 %
≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Redmi Note 13 使用直流调光来控制 OLED 面板的背光。直流调光的工作频率为 60 Hz 或 120 Hz,具体取决于屏幕的刷新率。

在显示设置或开发者选项中都没有手动切换防闪烁模式的选项。由于我们运行的是稳定版,第三方应用程序(如 Activity Launcher)只能显示隐藏的防闪烁设置,而不能激活它。

根据小米的说法,在亮度较低时,设备会切换到 1,920 Hz PWM 模式。我们无法确认这一数值,但我们发现在亮度滑块达到 10% 时,PWM 不会闪烁。直流调光似乎从 25% 开始启动,一直持续到最大亮度。

0% 亮度:无 PWM
0% 亮度:无 PWM
10% 亮度:无 PWM
10% 亮度:无 PWM
25% 亮度:120 Hz 直流调光
25% 亮度:120 Hz 直流调光
50% 亮度:120 赫兹直流调光
50% 亮度:120 赫兹直流调光
75% 亮度:120 赫兹直流调光
75% 亮度:120 赫兹直流调光
100% 亮度:120 Hz 直流调光
100% 亮度:120 Hz 直流调光

查看我们的文章"PWM 为何如此令人头疼"一文,了解更多信息,以及我们的 PWM 排名表来比较各评测设备的 PWM。

未检测到时间抖动。

由于显示屏亮度可提升至 1,000 尼特,即使在明亮的环境下,室外观看效果也令人满意。Note 13 能保持良好的视角稳定性,即使在极端环境下也不会出现亮度或色彩信息丢失的情况。

阳光下的户外观赏
阳光下的户外观赏
树荫下的户外观景
树荫下的户外观景
良好的视角稳定性
良好的视角稳定性

性能Dimensity 6080 定位在骁龙 685 和 695 之间

Redmi Note 13 5G 采用了 联发科 Dimensity 6080SoC,这只是一个改头换面的 Dimensity 810除了支持 10800 万像素摄像头外,没有任何变化。

因此,Note 13 的 Dimensity 6080 在 Geekbench 5.5 中的表现似乎与小米 Poco M4 Pro 中的 Dimensity 810 单核性能相当,多核性能略微领先。尽管如此,在安兔兔 v9、PCMark forAndroid 和 Procyon AI 推断基准测试中,Dimensity 6080 的性能还是超过了 Dimensity 810。

性能

Redmi Note 13 4G则依靠 骁龙 685而 Note 13 5G 则采用骁龙 685 处理器,在整体性能上比 Note 13 5G 的 Dimensity 6080 差了 22%。

OnePlus Nord CE 3 LiteSnapdragon 695 与 Note 13 的 Dimensity 6080 相比,CPU 性能累计提升了约 8%。不过,在 PCMark forAndroid 和 CrossMark 中,Dimensity 6080 仍处于领先地位,而在 Procyon AI 推断中则表现出明显优势。

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Smartphone
 
99.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
65 pt
Tecno Pova 6 Pro -9!
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
57.9 pt
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
57.6 pt
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
55.4 pt
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G -4!
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
53.9 pt
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
51.4 pt
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
 
51.4 pt
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
39.9 pt
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1038 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
783 Points +32%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
697 Points +18%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
678 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
593 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  (585 - 593, n=2)
589 Points -1%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
585 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
437 Points -26%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3465 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2778 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1943 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1925 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1903 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  (1856 - 1943, n=2)
1900 Points -2%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1856 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1775 Points -9%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=174, last 2 years)
1491 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points +32%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
916 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
893 Points +16%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
780 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  (769 - 780, n=2)
775 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
769 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
478 Points -38%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=174, last 2 years)
4175 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points +46%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2315 Points +16%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2099 Points +5%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2064 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  (1991 - 2099, n=2)
2045 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1991 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1544 Points -22%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +101%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
518476 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
436096 Points +8%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
404106 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
402681 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  ()
402681 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
353908 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
300122 Points -25%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points +27%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
13268 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=198, last 2 years)
13170 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10567 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  (10339 - 10567, n=2)
10453 Points -1%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10339 Points -2%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
10055 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
7305 Points -31%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=166, last 2 years)
915 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
628 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
601 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  ()
601 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
583 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
369 Points -39%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=160, last 2 years)
6451 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points +44%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3819 Points +24%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3773 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3268 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3073 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  ()
3073 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2728 Points -11%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=160, last 2 years)
10292 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points +45%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7745 Points +27%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6911 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6361 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
6320 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6085 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  ()
6085 Points 0%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=160, last 2 years)
7012 Points +78%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5004 Points +27%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4589 Points +17%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4560 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3929 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  ()
3929 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3285 Points -16%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)
17798 Points +484%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points +131%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4360 Points +43%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4200 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3050 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  ()
3050 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2929 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2331 Points -24%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=160, last 2 years)
1574 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1394 Points +14%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1382 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1334 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1224 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  ()
1224 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1144 Points -7%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years)
17730 Points +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9243 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  ()
9243 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6400 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6014 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points -35%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
5723 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
4615 Points -50%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=144, last 2 years)
25145 Points +2522%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3080 Points +221%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
959 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  ()
959 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
865 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
545 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
382 Points -60%

Dimensity 6080 使用相同的 Mali-G57 MP2图形处理器 Helio G96的相同 Mali-G57 MP2 GPU,但性能比起以前有了很大的提高。

Note 13 5G 的 Mali-G57 MP2 比 Adreno 610 快了 69%。 Adreno 610Redmi Note 13 4G 的 Adreno 610 快了 69%,尽管它落后于 Nord CE 3 Lite 的 Adreno 619在 GPU 累计测试中落后 14%。

有趣的是,Pova 6 Pro 中的 G57 MP2 在 3DMark 中的表现与 Note 13 5G 中的相当,但在 GFXBench 测试中却有显著提升。

GPU Performance Rating
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 pt
Tecno Pova 6 Pro -2!
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65.2 pt
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G -3!
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60.9 pt
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
54.4 pt
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G -1!
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52.3 pt
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52.1 pt
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30.8 pt
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
796 Points +121%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
359 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
348 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
135 Points -62%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
809 Points +120%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
368 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
368 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points -2%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
139 Points -62%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2796 Points +112%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1316 Points
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1303 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1210 Points -8%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1207 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
634 Points -52%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4391 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3873 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3804 Points -2%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3750 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3524 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2739 Points -29%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5118 Points +96%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2619 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2615 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2570 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2397 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1427 Points -45%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4936 Points +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2818 Points
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2807 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2770 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2580 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1597 Points -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +65%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
69 fps +21%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -30%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps +71%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
96 fps +39%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
74 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
66 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +89%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps +69%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
57 fps +58%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +19%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +84%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
70 fps +63%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
62 fps +44%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +96%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps +63%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
33 fps +38%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +93%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +59%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps +30%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
35 fps +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +92%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +85%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
18 fps +38%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +31%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.7 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +88%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +75%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +25%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
19 fps +19%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +125%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +35%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
11 fps +24%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.6 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +120%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.8 fps +32%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
7.1 fps +20%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.4 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +131%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +46%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
19 fps +46%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +15%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps -27%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +127%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +40%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
20 fps +33%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +13%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -33%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps +132%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.5 fps +40%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3 fps +20%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.7 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.5 fps -40%

Basemark GPUScore

05101520253035404550Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø8.07 (4.44-49.1)
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø7.09 (4.41-51.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø5.85 (3.18-38)
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø5.02 (3-52.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø2.96 (1.066-5.74)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø2.15 (0.891-4.02)

Redmi Note 13 5G 在大多数浏览器基准测试中的表现几乎与 Nord CE 3 Lite 5G 相当。网页浏览没有出现任何重大问题,而且大多数情况下反应灵敏。

Browser Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Smartphone
87 pt
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
83.1 pt
Tecno Pova 6 Pro -4!
64.6 pt
Motorola Moto G54
64.3 pt
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
53.6 pt
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080
51.2 pt
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
50.5 pt
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
33.6 pt
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G -1!
29.4 pt
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
124.3 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points +62%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
85.936 Points +21%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chrome 114)
78.264 Points +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080 ()
71.2 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
71.171 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
62.375 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
43.83 Points -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=153, last 2 years)
143.5 runs/min +99%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min +44%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
76.5 runs/min +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
72 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080 ()
72 runs/min 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chome 114)
58.2 runs/min -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
52.4 runs/min -27%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
39.8 runs/min -45%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points +50%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=160, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +43%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
97 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
82 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080 ()
82 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chrome 114)
80 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
49 Points -40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=212, last 2 years)
38407 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points +63%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
28919 Points +31%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro (Chrome 122)
24822 Points +12%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chrome 114)
24196 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (22145 - 24822, n=2)
23484 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
22145 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
19010 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
15900 Points -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
2534.6 ms * -26%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
2410 ms * -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
2014.2 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 6080 ()
2014 ms * -0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Chrome 114)
1615.5 ms * +20%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=168, last 2 years)
1521 ms * +24%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
1399.8 ms * +31%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

相比之下,Note 13 的存储空间优于其他配备类似 UFS 2.2 闪存的设备,尤其是 三星Galaxy A35和 Nord CE 3 Lite。

其读取性能甚至超过了 Moto G54的 UFS 3.0,但后者以更快的连续写入速度弥补了这一不足。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GTecno Pova 6 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GSamsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GOnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5GMotorola Moto G54Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-4%
-41%
-19%
-33%
13%
6%
83%
Sequential Read 256KB
951.97
991.8
4%
909.8
-4%
529.32
-44%
964
1%
506.1
-47%
983.01
3%
Sequential Write 256KB
503.79
515.3
2%
606.3
20%
270
-46%
471
-7%
466.6
-7%
817.55
62%
Random Read 4KB
243.8
192.6
-21%
177.1
-27%
244.24
0%
148.8
-39%
162.5
-33%
232.74
-5%
Random Write 4KB
240.36
235.7
-2%
228
-5%
62.59
-74%
171.8
-29%
134.9
-44%
224.58
-7%

游戏:120 帧的速度相差甚远

Note 13 5G 的芯片组性能不佳,而且 HyperOS 缺乏必要的优化,因此在 Note 13 5G 上实现 120 fps 的游戏速度是不可能的。

在高清设置下,《PUBG Mobile》的运行速度稳定在 30 帧/秒,而在平衡和流畅预置下可提高到 40 帧/秒。

玄心冲击》的帧数变化很大,取决于场景的复杂程度,但在最低图形预置下平均帧数为 40 帧。所有帧数指标均通过GameBench Pro应用程序记录。

没有明显的输入延迟,触控响应似乎也不错,但竞技游戏玩家很快就会发现不足之处,尽管小米声称触控采样率为 2,160 Hz。

PUBG Mobile:高清预设,平均每秒 30 帧。
PUBG Mobile:高清预设,平均每秒 30 帧。
PUBG Mobile:预设流畅,平均每秒 40 帧。
PUBG Mobile:预设流畅,平均每秒 40 帧。
元心冲击:最低预设值,最大 53 fps。
元心冲击:最低预设值,最大 53 fps。
Genshin Impact:最高预设值,平均 30 fps。
Genshin Impact:最高预设值,平均 30 fps。
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.2.0: Ø39.8 (30-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 3.2.0: Ø39.7 (28-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.2.0: Ø29.9 (24-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø43.1 (29-56)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø29.7 (18-44)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø26.6 (14-40)

排放:保持冷静的风度,不节流

温度

Redmi Note 13 5G 是一款很酷的产品,在正常使用过程中几乎不会发热,手持操作非常舒适。

在满载情况下,我们在显示屏右上角记录到的最高表面温度为 39.2 °C。

散热系统似乎与适中的 SoC 相得益彰,在 3DMark Wild Life Stress 测试中没有出现节流现象就证明了这一点。

Max. Load
 39.2 °C35.6 °C30.8 °C 
 37.6 °C34.8 °C30.6 °C 
 36.8 °C33.4 °C30.4 °C 
Maximum: 39.2 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
30.8 °C34.2 °C34 °C
30.6 °C32.8 °C33.6 °C
30.6 °C33.4 °C33.2 °C
Maximum: 34.2 °C
Average: 32.6 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
压力测试返回顶部
压力测试返回顶部
压力测试:底部
压力测试:底部

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 %
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % -1%
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % -1%
012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.22 (2.21-2.22)
Tecno Pova 6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.23 (2.21-2.24)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.17 (2.16-2.18)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.98 (7.96-8.01)
Tecno Pova 6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.97 (7.94-8)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.24-7.27)

发言人

Redmi Note 13 Pro 和 Pro+ 提供立体声设置,而普通的 Note 13 5G 则只能使用单个底部扬声器。

音量足够大,但你可能会经常发现自己把音量调到了 200%。低音明显不足,但整个频谱的线性度相当稳定。

通过 USB Type-C 或蓝牙连接外置扬声器可以获得更好的音频体验。Note 13 5G 支持大多数蓝牙编码,包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC 和 LHDC V1 至 V5。还可以配置杜比全景声和均衡器预置。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2010.29.22512.411.33112.77.94018.69.75019.815.36324.912.28022.814.91001915.812520.117.11601827.520018.83425015.639.231516.842.940017.748.450010.651.463010.154.18008.956.310008.361.512507.861.816007.164.920006.361.825003.460.931500.963.240001.459.950000.268.163000.3718000-0.570.710000-0.559.9125002.361.71600010.349.7SPL20.277.1N0.235.9median 8.9median 59.9Delta7.710.132.444.925.739.92138.618.740.12842.224.940.521.643.618.745.916.351.620.25515.55617.258.120.763.318.26513.568.51470.313.972.512.976.214.678.213.277.713.479.613.881.113.481.913.684.814.183.513.58013.58013.779.413.972.613.26526.792.30.891.9median 13.9median 76.21.58hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GApple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理:功耗低,但电池续航时间可以更长

耗电量

与竞争对手相比,Redmi Note 13 的耗电量非常低廉。奇怪的是,经过反复测试,我们发现最低亮度时的空闲功耗要高于其他空闲状态。一种可能的解释是,在较低亮度下切换到高频 PWM 会增加空闲功耗。

尽管最大负载时的峰值功耗较高,Dimensity 6080 在中等工作负载下仍相当经济。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 0.88 / 0.96 Watt
Load midlight 2.79 / 8.82 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.6"
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G54
Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Average ARM Mali-G57 MP2
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-23%
-65%
-35%
-30%
-10%
-52%
-52%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
1.1
8%
0.89
26%
0.51
57%
1.1
8%
0.9
25%
0.941 ?(0.51 - 1.9, n=25)
22%
Idle Average *
0.88
1.3
-48%
1.99
-126%
1.96
-123%
1.5
-70%
1.2
-36%
1.951 ?(0.88 - 4.52, n=25)
-122%
Idle Maximum *
0.96
1.5
-56%
2.14
-123%
2.01
-109%
1.7
-77%
1.5
-56%
2.12 ?(0.96 - 4.58, n=25)
-121%
Load Average *
2.79
3.6
-29%
4.57
-64%
3.86
-38%
4.1
-47%
3.3
-18%
4.54 ?(2.3 - 10.5, n=24)
-63%
Load Maximum *
8.82
7.8
12%
12.31
-40%
5.62
36%
5.8
34%
5.6
37%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.1 (0.743-6.08)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G SD 685, Adreno 610; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.73 (1.11-7.79)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.17 (1.106-5.28)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.883 (0.798-1.315)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G SD 685, Adreno 610; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.326 (1.144-3.09)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.302 (1.193-1.739)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.76 (2.02-3.09)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G SD 685, Adreno 610; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.36 (3.15-4.73)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.19 (4.13-5.81)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.883 (0.798-1.315)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G SD 685, Adreno 610; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.326 (1.144-3.09)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.302 (1.193-1.739)

电池寿命

Redmi Note 13 5G 的 5,000 mAh 电池能够连续使用一整天,无需大费周章,但竞争对手的续航时间要长得多。在我们的 150 尼特 Wi-Fi 浏览电池测试中,Pova 6 Pro 由于电池容量更大,续航时间延长了 38%。

Nord CE 3 Lite 5G 和Redmi Note 13 4G 的续航时间也更长,尤其是在 150 尼特条件下播放 H.264 1080p 视频时,尽管它们采用了与 Note 13 5G 相似的 5,000 毫安时电池。

随机附送的 33 瓦电源适配器从零开始充满电最长需要 80 分钟,初始充 50%电大约需要 30 分钟。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
19h 20min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 40min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5000 mAh
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, AMOLED, 2436x1080, 6000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610, AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619, IPS, 2400x1080, 5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G54
Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, IPS, 2400x1080, 5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
38%
25%
48%
47%
30%
59%
43%
Reader / Idle
1160
1509
30%
2600
124%
2722
135%
2165
87%
3481
200%
H.264
868
1358
56%
1401
61%
1008
16%
1029
19%
1041
20%
WiFi v1.3
801
1108
38%
742
-7%
902
13%
966
21%
986
23%
875
9%
Load
280
334
19%
262
-6%
322
15%
254
-9%
301
8%

Pros

+ 朴实无华的构造和引人注目的配色方案
+ 耳机插孔和红外爆破器
+ 提供 HyperOS 更新,已确认Android 15
+ 10800 万像素摄像头和 1600 万像素自拍摄像头可拍摄出优质照片
+ 色彩鲜艳的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏

Cons

- 无 Wi-Fi 6
- 听筒音量小
- 主摄像头缺乏 EIS/OIS、60 fps 和 4K 视频录制功能
- Dimensity 6080 SoC 开始显出老态
- 电池续航能力有待提高

结论人人都能负担得起的 5G,但有几处明显的疏漏

小米Redmi Note 13 5G。评测机由小米印度公司提供。
小米Redmi Note 13 5G。评测机由小米印度公司提供。

小米Redmi Note 13 5G(又称 Note 13 Classic)以低于 2 万欧元的价格让所有人都能使用 5G。这款智能手机的设计和做工是红米手机的标志--简单实用。

我们测试机型的北极白外观给人一种独特的视觉吸引力。HyperOS 现已适用于该智能手机,但与 MIUI 14 相比,用户不太可能注意到任何巨大的变化。

Note 13 5G 的 108 MP 摄像头质量相对于 Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G三星Galaxy A35 5G.即使是 2 倍和 3 倍传感器裁剪的照片也非常实用。同样令人印象深刻的还有 6.67 英寸 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏,它具有良好的色彩还原能力、HDR10、强光下 1,000 尼特峰值亮度和快速响应时间。

小米Redmi Note 13 5G 将出色的 AMOLED 显示屏和高可靠性的 10800 万像素摄像头浓缩成了一款非常平易近人的廉价产品。不过,Note 13 5G 的诱惑力掩盖了其功能上的一系列妥协。

Dimensity 6080 可为大多数休闲任务提供足够的性能,但这款基本上已使用了三年的翻版芯片无法与 OnePlus Nord CE 3 LG 上的骁龙 695 相媲美。 OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G.至少它比 OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G 中的骁龙 685 更快。 Note 13 4G至少比 Note 13 4G 的骁龙 685 更快。

虽然 Note 13 5G 总体看来还算不错,但也存在一些明显的不足。它没有 Wi-Fi 6、没有 L5 GPS、没有 VoNR 通话、没有 EIS/OIS、没有 60 fps 或 4K 视频录制、没有立体声扬声器,而且只有 33 W 快速充电功能、一个 USB 2.0 Type-C 端口和一个缓慢的 microSD 读卡器。我们对电池的运行时间也不太满意,尽管它们本身并不差。

更令人沮丧的是,小米在 Poco X6 上提供了几乎与 Note 13 5G 相同的版本,它解决了上述不足,甚至还搭载了骁龙 7s Gen 2 --所有这些都在相似的价位上。

价格和供应情况

小米Redmi Note 13 5G 在美国亚马逊上的售价为 227.50 美元或 212 欧元。这款智能手机在印度亚马逊的售价为 18,999 ₹。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G - 07/02/2024 v8
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
75 / 75 → 100%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
48 / 69 → 70%
Weight
91%
Battery
89%
Display
91%
Games Performance
5 / 55 → 10%
Application Performance
55 / 85 → 65%
AI Performance
14%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
59 / 90 → 66%
Camera
64%
Average
69%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 13 5G 智能手机评测:120赫兹AMOLED和108MP摄像头,售价不到2万英镑(200欧元)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2024-06-18 (Update: 2024-08-15)