Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 平板电脑评测--填补空白的产品

第二选择

三星将推出Galaxy Tab S9 的粉丝版，名为Galaxy Tab S9 FE。三星此举旨在缩小旗舰机型与更经济实惠的 A 系列之间的差距。Galaxy Tab S9 FE 放弃了 OLED 技术和 Snapdragon 处理能力，但价格更实惠。我们探讨了这种高性价比的选择更适合哪些人。
Android Galaxy S Tablet Touchscreen

继Galaxy Tab S9 系列有三种尺寸的标准平板电脑之后，三星现在又推出了该系列的 Fan 版。三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 配备 10.9 英寸显示屏，而其更大的变体，即 Galaxy Tab S9 FE+则拥有 12.4 英寸面板。

Galaxy Tab S9 FE 提供 WiFi 和 5G 两种版本，有四种不同的颜色：灰色、银色、薄荷色和薰衣草色（粉色）。三星提供两种存储选择：一种是 6 GB 内存和 128 GB 存储空间，另一种是 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。Plus 机型提供 8 或 12 GB 内存和相同的存储选项。我们的测试机内存较小，没有 SIM 卡连接，机身颜色为淡紫色。

值得注意的是，三星没有发布 Tab S8 FE。 Galaxy Tab S8 FE.因此，它的直接前身是Galaxy Tab S7 FE，只有一种尺寸，配备 12.4 英寸显示屏。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Galaxy Tab S9 FE Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1380 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Display
10.90 inch 16:10, 2304 x 1440 pixel 249 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, TFT-LCD, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 99 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD-Card, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, position sensor, compass, hall sensor, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.5 x 254.3 x 165.8
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f1,9)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f2,4)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, USB-Cable (USB-C to USB-C), SIM-Tool, S-Pen, One UI 5.1.1, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS; DRM Widevine L1; Camera2 API Limited; IP68, fanless, waterproof
Weight
524 g
Price
529 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.8 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5		524 g6.5 mm10.90"2304x1440
90.9 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		500 g5.9 mm11.00"2560x1600
88.8 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Xiaomi Pad 6
SD 870, Adreno 650		490 g6.51 mm11.00"2880x1800
89.7 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
SD 870, Adreno 650		449 g5.9 mm11.00"2560x1600
89.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Google Pixel Tablet
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		493 g8.1 mm10.95"2560x1600
88.6 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Apple iPad 10
A14, A14 Bionic GPU		477 g7 mm10.90"2360x1640

保护套 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE，IP68 防护等级

在Galaxy Tab S9 FE 上，三星使用了铝制外壳，仅在短边处进行了分割，以容纳天线条。尽管它们比Galaxy Tab S9 稍宽一些，但显示屏四角是平整的。康宁大猩猩 3 号玻璃为显示屏提供了良好的保护。平板电脑的防护等级为 IP68，可以防止灰尘和水的渗入。

集成按键提供了一个正压力点，并牢固地嵌入外壳。平板电脑放在桌子上时，即使背部摄像头有较大的突出部分，也能保持足够的稳定性，以便输入数据。用力扭动外壳时会发出轻微的吱吱声。不过，平板电脑的结构质量还是非常出色的，过渡无缝，没有明显的缺陷。

尺寸比较

❌
258 mm 169 mm 8.1 mm 493 g254.3 mm 165.8 mm 6.5 mm 524 g253.95 mm 165.18 mm 6.51 mm 490 g254.3 mm 165.8 mm 5.9 mm 500 g248.6 mm 179.5 mm 7 mm 477 g249.2 mm 160.4 mm 5.9 mm 449 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

连接性 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE 只有 USB 2.0 接口

三星继续通过 microSD 卡为Galaxy 平板电脑扩展内存。不过，USB 端口为 USB-C 2.0。该端口兼容 exFAT 格式，但只支持 NTFS 读取，而且无法输出图像。

Galaxy Tab S9 FE 支持蓝牙 5.3 和 DRM Widevine 1 级。它具有红外线、NFC 和插孔连接功能。三星为这款平板电脑配备了一支名为 S-Pen 的有源手写笔。不过，FE 版 S-Pen 缺少蓝牙功能。与Galaxy Tab S9 不同，FE 型号也不包括振动电机。

右侧USB-C、扬声器
右侧USB-C、扬声器
底部插针连接器
底部插针连接器
顶部：麦克风、音量摇杆；带指纹识别器的电源按钮
顶部：麦克风、音量摇杆；带指纹识别器的电源按钮
左：扬声器、麦克风、存储卡插槽
左：扬声器、麦克风、存储卡插槽

microSD 读卡器

Galaxy Tab S9 FE 的内存可通过 microSD 卡扩展，支持最大 1 TB 的卡，包括 exFAT 标准。在我们使用 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 参考卡进行的拷贝测试中，Galaxy Tab S9 FE 的传输速率达到了 58.36 MB/s，超过了标准的Galaxy Tab S9。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
58.36 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
52.5 MB/s -10%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.3 (30.1-58)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.1 (28.4-52)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.7 (43.8-97.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.5 (37.9-82.2)

软件 - 支持长期更新的三星

Galaxy Tab S9 FE 预装了Android 13，三星在上面使用了自己的 One UI 5.1.1。该平板电脑将获得四年的主要更新和五年的安全更新，不过这些更新只在平板电脑上按季度提供。

，许多三星应用程序以及谷歌和微软的软件都已安装完毕。交付时，29 GB 的存储空间已被占用。该平板电脑的 Fan 版还配备了三星 DeX，可让设备进入桌面模式，从而提高工作效率。

三星还为笔操作提供了一些定制功能，支持手写笔记和草图。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE 目前没有卫星连接

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 支持 Wi-Fi 6，我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 测量了传输速度。相比之下，这款平板电脑无需躲躲藏藏；它的速度比 Apple iPad 10的速度快，但不如 Galaxy 平板电脑 S9.

我们在测试中遇到了卫星连接的问题。根据生产商的说法，这款平板电脑应该能与所有已知的卫星系统建立连接，但它却不能。目前，许多用户似乎都遇到了这个问题。我们仍在等待三星公司的声明。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
951 (929min - 960max) MBit/s +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6
932 (727min - 966max) MBit/s +10%
Google Pixel Tablet
881 (690min - 925max) MBit/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
847 (791min - 876max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 10
741 (621min - 759max) MBit/s -13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
735 (687min - 788max) MBit/s -13%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
944 (474min - 970max) MBit/s +19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
893 (775min - 941max) MBit/s +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6
880 (791min - 925max) MBit/s +11%
Apple iPad 10
816 (764min - 851max) MBit/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
795 (342min - 895max) MBit/s
Google Pixel Tablet
690 (241min - 849max) MBit/s -13%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø847 (791-876)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (929-960)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø795 (342-895)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø929 (474-970)

摄像头 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE 在黑暗中不堪一击

Galaxy Tab S9 FE 自拍
Galaxy Tab S9 FE 自拍

与Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 不同，体积更小的Galaxy Tab S9 FE 背面只有一个摄像头，最大分辨率为 800 万像素。前置摄像头为 1200 万像素。相机应用布局清晰，但仍提供专业模式。

在视频方面，两款相机存在差异。自拍摄像头的最高拍摄速度为 UHD 和 30 FPS，而后置摄像头的最高拍摄速度为 FHD 和 30 FPS。在视频专业模式下，还可以更改白平衡、EV 和 ISO。

该应用还提供了夜景、食物、全景和慢动作拍摄模式。三星还为 AR 贴纸和 AR emojis 提供了一个 "AR 区域"。"Bixby Vision "是三星与谷歌 Lens 相对应的应用。

在光线充足的条件下，图像质量还不错。但是，图像缺乏细节。在弱光环境下，纹理会消失，有些区域非常暗，几乎无法辨认。变焦拍摄在 2 倍变焦时可用，但在更高的变焦水平下，软件会对图像进行严重的过度绘制。平板电脑无法实现四倍以上的变焦，我们的对比图像也是如此。

在明亮的光线下，图像的色彩偏差很好。在弱光环境下（1 勒克斯），照相机无法工作，图像内容也无法识别。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HaseSee5X ZoomLow light
ColorChecker
5.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: 6.04 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 13.83 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
49 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
77 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: 47.46 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 92.93 ∆E

配件和保修 - 三星提供大量配件

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 随附 USB 数据线（双面 USB-C）、快速入门指南、SIM 卡工具和配色 S Pen。它提供各种保护套和键盘盖作为配件。

三星为Galaxy Tab S9 FE 提供 12 个月的保修服务。制造商还为该设备提供 Samsung Care+。

输入设备和操作 - 包括 S-Pen

Galaxy Tab S9 FE 依赖于三星自己的三星键盘。纵向和横向格式的输入都很可靠。显示屏的滑动性能总体上非常好。手写笔集成非常出色。

它在Galaxy Tab S9 FE 的电源按钮上使用了指纹识别器。要解锁设备，只需将手指放在上面即可。传感器工作可靠，但有时需要一秒钟才能激活屏幕。

不过，在光线充足的情况下，双击显示屏通常足以激活面部解锁功能，如果需要，还可以跳过锁屏，解锁设备。这种方法不仅可靠，而且速度很快，但前提是有足够的光线。

Galaxy Tab S9 FE 没有 OLED 显示屏，但非常明亮

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Galaxy Tab S9 和 S9 FE 在显示屏方面有明显区别。这是因为生产商在 FE 版本中使用的是 10.9 英寸 LC 显示屏，而不是 OLED 面板。不过，Apple iPad 10 和 谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑也采用了这种技术。Galaxy Tab S9 FE 的屏幕在我们的测量中拥有最佳的最大亮度。我们测得的平均亮度为 694.7 cd/m²。

我们是在环境光传感器激活的情况下达到这些值的。关闭传感器后，平板电脑的亮度也达到了 630 尼特。最低亮度为 6.23 cd/m²。我们确实在Galaxy Tab S9 FE 上测量到了屏幕闪烁，但幸运的是，闪烁的频率非常高。

显示屏可以高达 90 Hz 的频率播放内容。不支持 LTPO，但面板可以以 30、60 或 90 Hz 的频率播放内容--根据 DRM Info 的说法。该显示器可播放 HDR10 和 HLG 格式的内容。还支持 DRM Widvine L1。

672
cd/m²		700
cd/m²		705
cd/m²
654
cd/m²		694
cd/m²		705
cd/m²
660
cd/m²		715
cd/m²		747
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 747 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 694.7 cd/m² Minimum: 6.26 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 694 cd/m²
Contrast: 1052:1 (Black: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
TFT-LCD, 2304x1440, 10.9"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2560x1600, 11"		Xiaomi Pad 6
IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 11"		Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
AMOLED, 2560x1600, 11"		Google Pixel Tablet
IPS, 2560x1600, 11"		Apple iPad 10
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"
Screen
-3%
13%
18%
14%
5%
Brightness middle
694
576
-17%
541
-22%
584
-16%
521
-25%
467
-33%
Brightness
695
579
-17%
494
-29%
574
-17%
508
-27%
468
-33%
Brightness Distribution
88
99
13%
89
1%
91
3%
89
1%
92
5%
Black Level *
0.66
0.65
2%
0.51
23%
0.49
26%
Contrast
1052
832
-21%
1022
-3%
953
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.1
2.5
-19%
0.9
57%
1.03
51%
1.2
43%
1.4
33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.3
4.6
-7%
1.8
58%
2.64
39%
2.6
40%
3.3
23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
2.3
30%
1.4
58%
1.8
45%
1.3
61%
2.3
30%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.02 109%
2.26 97%
2.159 102%
2.2 100%
2.21 100%
CCT
7010 93%
6585 99%
6710 97%
6744 96%
6696 97%
6852 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 84400 Hz ≤ 13 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 84400 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 13 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 84400 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

面板的色彩平衡很好。只有白色和较亮的灰色色调偏差较大。根据 CalMAN 2D 测量，显示屏覆盖了 96.7% 的 sRGB 色彩空间。与 OLED 不同，黑阶和对比度并不完美，但与竞争对手相当。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
20.66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.638 ms rise
↘ 14.02 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.543 ms rise
↘ 23.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 的可视角度稳定性很好。从锐角也能看到内容。几个人可以同时轻松查看平板电脑上的内容。该设备还适合户外使用。由于最大亮度高，显示屏在户外也能轻松阅读。

性能 - Exynos 无法与 Snapdragon 竞争

与Galaxy Tab S9 不同，三星并不依赖于 骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy Tab S9 FE 中的Galaxy ，而是依靠自己的 Exynos 1380和 6GB RAM。

不过，不仅Galaxy Tab S9 的速度明显更快，而且所有对比设备的速度都更快。Galaxy Tab S9 FE 在几乎所有的基准测试中都是红灯笼。在日常使用中，用户界面总会出现卡顿，打开或关闭应用程序时也会出现延迟。当在 Chrome 浏览器中打开多个标签页时，我们也能将这款平板电脑的性能推向极限。

，存储速度也明显慢于Galaxy Tab S9。我们曾称赞过它的快速存储能力。相比之下，Galaxy Tab S9 FE 的速度明显落后于对比设备。在 AndroBench 的连续读取中，所有其他设备的速度至少是它的三倍。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 10
1580 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
1550 Points +99%
Google Pixel Tablet
1078 Points +39%
Xiaomi Pad 6
1003 Points +29%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
943 Points +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (771 - 788, n=5)
781 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
778 Points
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points -9%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
5036 Points +85%
Apple iPad 10
4027 Points +48%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
3362 Points +23%
Xiaomi Pad 6
3328 Points +22%
Google Pixel Tablet
3212 Points +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (2719 - 2817, n=5)
2761 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
2728 Points
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2496 Points -9%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
2079 Points +106%
Google Pixel Tablet
1435 Points +42%
Xiaomi Pad 6
1299 Points +28%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)
1093 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (1011 - 1023, n=4)
1016 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
1011 Points
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
5503 Points +93%
Google Pixel Tablet
3667 Points +28%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)
3518 Points +23%
Xiaomi Pad 6
3357 Points +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (2858 - 2906, n=4)
2882 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
2858 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
1286774 Points +155%
Apple iPad 10
691084 Points +37%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
677914 Points +34%
Google Pixel Tablet
635893 Points +26%
Xiaomi Pad 6
581322 Points +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (505141 - 518476, n=4)
510383 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
505141 Points
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)
464403 Points -8%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
16172 Points +44%
Xiaomi Pad 6
13728 Points +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (11259 - 13488, n=5)
12568 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
11259 Points
Google Pixel Tablet
10638 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
9827 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9812 Points -13%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
1222 Points +82%
Apple iPad 10
987 Points +47%
Google Pixel Tablet
889 Points +32%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
772 Points +15%
Xiaomi Pad 6
754 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
732 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
673 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (637 - 703, n=5)
665 Points -1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
8673 Points +96%
Google Pixel Tablet
6419 Points +45%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
6043 Points +37%
Xiaomi Pad 6
5289 Points +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (4416 - 4666, n=5)
4501 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4424 Points
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4210 Points -5%
Apple iPad 10
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
14097 Points +56%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
10334 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
9016 Points
Google Pixel Tablet
8938 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (8843 - 9016, n=5)
8932 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 6
8463 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7279 Points -19%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
8702 Points +94%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
7694 Points +72%
Google Pixel Tablet
6548 Points +46%
Xiaomi Pad 6
6127 Points +37%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4874 Points +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (4301 - 4857, n=5)
4607 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4486 Points
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
31626 Points +350%
Google Pixel Tablet
16372 Points +133%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
12445 Points +77%
Xiaomi Pad 6
11263 Points +60%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9171 Points +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (7031 - 7126, n=5)
7072 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
7031 Points
Web
Google Pixel Tablet
1721 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
1460 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (1334 - 1533, n=5)
1409 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
1348 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
1347 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6
1336 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points -6%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)
7152 Points +1025%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
1308 Points +106%
Google Pixel Tablet
887 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
636 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (545 - 647, n=5)
605 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Points -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel Tablet
44323 Points +625%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
17904 Points +193%
Xiaomi Pad 6
16501 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
16088 Points +163%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11329 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
6110 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (5835 - 6152, n=5)
6012 Points -2%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel Tablet Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD
 
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
 
Average of class Tablet

在Galaxy Tab S9 FE 中，三星依靠的是 ARM Mali-G68 MP5 图形单元。因此，FE 平板电脑又一次在测量比较中占据了最后的位置。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3826 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3001 Points
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
2124 Points -29%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1839 Points -39%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1233 Points -59%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1216 Points -59%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3857 Points +360%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
2250 Points +168%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1803 Points +115%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1246 Points +49%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1230 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
838 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14527 Points +386%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
8539 Points +186%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6599 Points +121%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4252 Points +42%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4244 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2987 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6649 Points +125%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4293 Points +45%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4243 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2958 Points
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14235 Points +184%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8948 Points +78%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7363 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5013 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24605 Points +370%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11589 Points +121%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8593 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5233 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5751 Points +32%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4983 Points +14%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4882 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4369 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +46%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +45%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -27%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
367 fps +206%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
317 fps +164%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
305 fps +154%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
230 fps +92%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
120 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +107%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps +31%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +3%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
249 fps +215%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
175 fps +122%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
171 fps +116%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps +67%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97 fps +177%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
58 fps +66%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +60%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -6%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
186 fps +251%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
120 fps +126%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +113%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps +77%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps +205%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
45 fps +114%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +86%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +52%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +287%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
75 fps +142%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +116%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +87%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps +288%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
34 fps +113%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +88%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +31%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +393%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
32 fps +129%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +121%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps +57%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95 fps +296%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
47 fps +96%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +79%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -8%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
168 fps +380%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
94 fps +169%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps +120%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +66%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +433%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
16 fps +167%
Google Pixel Tablet
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +133%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps +67%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.7 fps +62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
178.932 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
152.9 Points +49%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)
117.838 Points +15%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
108.7 Points +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (94.6 - 119.6, n=5)
107.2 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
102.6 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)
86.985 Points -15%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)
63.9 Points -38%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
179 Points +67%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
147 Points +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (97 - 123, n=5)
109.6 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
107 Points
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)
104.3 Points -3%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)
98 Points -8%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)
94 Points -12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)
72 Points -33%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
231 Points +85%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
214 Points +71%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
149.6 Points +20%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)
134 Points +7%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (chrome 115)
134 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (124 - 145, n=3)
131.3 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
125 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)
94 Points -25%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
272 runs/min +240%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
197 runs/min +146%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)
134 runs/min +67%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)
115.5 runs/min +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (70.5 - 104, n=4)
86.7 runs/min +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
80.1 runs/min
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)
68.93 runs/min -14%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)
53.6 runs/min -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
59963 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (Edge 117)
49582 Points +43%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)
47939 Points +38%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (33801 - 36155, n=5)
35093 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
34739 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)
33003 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)
30783 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points -18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3789 ms * -213%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
1532.5 ms * -27%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)
1532.1 ms * -27%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)
1354.5 ms * -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
1208.7 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (1099 - 1209, n=5)
1159 ms * +4%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)
930.2 ms * +23%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
547 ms * +55%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FESamsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GXiaomi Pad 6Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022Google Pixel TabletAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
362%
189%
129%
122%
70%
100%
Sequential Read 256KB
526.65
3355.97
537%
1673.97
218%
1615
207%
1473.3
180%
728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71)
38%
1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years)
98%
Sequential Write 256KB
282.47
2188.2
675%
745.32
164%
730.7
159%
307.57
9%
527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71)
87%
684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years)
142%
Random Read 4KB
225.02
451.18
101%
298.45
33%
171.3
-24%
219.43
-2%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
-15%
189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
68.78
160.96
134%
304.34
342%
187.8
173%
274.59
299%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
170%
189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years)
176%

游戏

目前的游戏，如《PUBG Mobile》或《Asphalt 9》都可以在平板电脑上玩，但设置明显低于Galaxy Tab S9。例如，《BUBG Mobile》可以在高清分辨率下以最大帧率运行。

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 上的 PUBG Mobile
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 上的 PUBG Mobile
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 上的 Asphalt 9
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 上的 Asphalt 9
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 4.3.3a: Ø59.7 (56-61)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 4.3.0h: Ø58.4 (39-61)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 4.3.3a: Ø58.6 (48-62)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 4.3.0h: Ø58.4 (39-61)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.2.1_18831865_18963989: Ø53.6 (27-61)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.2.1_18831865_18963989: Ø50.3 (24-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.9.0: Ø30 (29-31)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.9.0: Ø30 (29-31)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.8.0: Ø59.9 (58-61)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.8.0: Ø40 (39-41)

排放 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE 没有发热问题

温度 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE 保持凉爽

Galaxy Tab S9 FE 在日常使用中始终保持低温。只有在游戏等重负载情况下，温度才会明显升高，尤其是靠近摄像头的上部区域。我们在烧机基准测试中记录到的最高表面温度为 40.9 度。

此外，Galaxy Tab S9 FE 在 3D Mark 压力测试中表现出了很强的韧性，没有出现任何节流迹象。

Max. Load
 32 °C31.2 °C29.3 °C 
 36.1 °C32.7 °C29.3 °C 
 40.9 °C34.7 °C29.4 °C 
Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 32.8 °C
28.5 °C30.3 °C36.7 °C
29.9 °C31.2 °C40.4 °C
29.4 °C33 °C39.9 °C
Maximum: 40.4 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.6-17.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø66.2 (58.8-82.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.05 (5.03-5.07)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.6 (19.8-23.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.5 (14.4-18.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.4 (15.9-18.3)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
99.3 (5.03min - 5.07max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
84.9 (19.8min - 23.3max) % -15%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
98.4 (17.6min - 17.9max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
71.6 (58.8min - 82.1max) % -27%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
79.8 (14.4min - 18.1max) %
Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
86.8 (15.9min - 18.3max) %

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

扬声器 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE 具有良好的立体声效果

这款平板电脑配备了专为 FE 版调校的立体声扬声器，使用了两个扬声器，而不是Galaxy Tab S9 的四个扬声器。无论是听音乐还是玩游戏，它都能带来令人印象深刻的音频体验。值得注意的是，中音均衡，音质悦耳。此外，Galaxy Tab S9 在高频和低频方面都表现出色。

虽然这款平板电脑没有传统的耳机插孔，但它可以容纳 USB-C 连接的耳机，并在测试过程中与蓝牙耳机无缝配对。值得注意的是，支持的编解码器包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和 SSC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.937.92529.6273123.725.64035.629.35038.639.16324.230.58018.934.310018.940.312515.745.816013.959.720014.759.725015.263.731512.966.940011.46750012.77163012.270.180011.571.6100011.673.6125013.675.3160012.875.820001374.4250012.774.1315012.775.1400012.975.9500013.473630013.471.8800013.9731000013.669.51250013.660.61600013.753.7SPL25.185.7N0.668.5median 13.4median 71Delta0.76.13336.730.933.919.423.127.334.33741.526.934.11943.518.446.71555.716.163.615.964.414.266.912.170.41469.414.775.71574.813.776.414.177.913.678.513.18012.879.113.373.713.469.513.875.51480.314.177.513.57513.773.913.668.513.16626890.783median 13.8median 74.80.75.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FESamsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE 具有极低的能耗

耗电量

在功耗方面，Galaxy Tab S9 FE 处于同类产品的平均水平。与Galaxy Tab S9 相比，测量结果的一个显著特点是最低耗电量大大降低。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.54 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.13 / 4.81 / 4.89 Watt
Load midlight 15.02 / 15.22 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
8000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
8400 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 6
8840 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
8300 mAh		Google Pixel Tablet
7020 mAh		Apple iPad 10
7606 mAh
Power Consumption
-3%
5%
19%
-2%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
1.13
2.58
-128%
0.96
15%
1.9
-68%
1.33
-18%
1.34
-19%
Idle Average *
4.81
3.24
33%
4.91
-2%
2.2
54%
4.67
3%
7.78
-62%
Idle Maximum *
4.89
3.39
31%
5.07
-4%
3
39%
4.78
2%
7.89
-61%
Load Average *
15.02
7.02
53%
11.8
21%
7.2
52%
9.81
35%
9.05
40%
Load Maximum *
15.22
15.86
-4%
15.9
-4%
12.7
17%
19.76
-30%
9.98
34%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380: Ø6.76 (2.38-11.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy: Ø8.87 (3.26-15.7)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.4 (4.89-6.13)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.3 (9.05-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.29 (2.22-2.76)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.31 (3.25-3.39)

电池续航时间 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE 电池续航时间长

在电池续航时间方面，Galaxy Tab S9 FE 再次超越了它的同胞兄弟--标准版Galaxy Tab S9。在我们的日常 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间达到了令人印象深刻的 14.5 小时，比旗舰机型有了显著提高。而 谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑Galaxy

不过，在充电速度方面，我们的热情有所减弱。三星建议使用输出功率在 15 到 45 瓦之间的电源。在我们使用 Anker Powerhouse 555在使用 Anker Powerhouse 555 的测试中，我们的最大输出功率为 25 瓦，平板电脑从 0 充到 100%需要近 3 个小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 32min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
8000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
8400 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 6
8840 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022
8300 mAh		Google Pixel Tablet
7020 mAh		Apple iPad 10
7606 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
872
539
-38%
823
-6%
905
4%
992
14%
647
-26%

Pros

+ 明亮的显示屏
+ 良好的手写笔功能，附带笔
+ 可扩展存储空间
+ 质量上乘

Cons

- 内置存储器速度慢
- 测试期间无法连接卫星
- 充电速度慢
- SoC 性能相对较低

结论 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE 显示屏出色，性能有限

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 评测。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 评测。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 的 "粉丝版 "名称是否恰当值得商榷。实际上，FE 机型是旗舰Galaxy Tab S9 平板电脑的缩减版，在处理器、显示屏和内存方面做了明显的妥协。这些妥协对性能的影响最为明显，在测试过程中出现了浏览器崩溃和用户界面卡顿的情况。对于追求顶级性能的用户来说，标准版Galaxy Tab S9 可能是更令人满意的选择。

不过，对于那些对性能要求不高的用户来说，Galaxy Tab S9 FE 提供的 TFT-LC 显示屏尽管性能有所下降，但亮度令人印象深刻。可以检测到屏幕闪烁，但频率较高。虽然缺少蓝牙功能，但 S Pen 的加入还是值得肯定的。

从本质上讲，Galaxy Tab S9 FE 是Galaxy Tab S9 的经济型替代产品。这款经济实惠机型的可行性主要取决于用户的具体需求和使用模式。

Tab S9 FE 的相机性能尚可，扬声器的表现令人印象深刻，整体制造质量也值得称赞。尽管安装了硬件，但没有卫星定位功能是一个明显的缺点。

这款平板电脑成功地填补了高端Galaxy Tab S9 和价格更实惠的Galaxy Tab A8 之间的空白。在这一价格区间，它面临着来自Apple 生态系统中的iPad 10 、配备扬声器底座的谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑 以及更经济实惠的小米 Pad 6 的激烈竞争。

价格和供应情况

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 可在包括亚马逊在内的多家零售商和Samsung测试机的零售价为 549.99 美元。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE - 11/23/2023 v7 (old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
42 / 70 → 60%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 89%
Battery
90%
Display
87%
Games Performance
51 / 78 → 65%
Application Performance
77 / 92 → 83%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
85 / 91 → 93%
Camera
52 / 85 → 61%
Average
77%
87%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE 平板电脑评测--填补空白的产品
Benedikt Winkel, 2023-11-26 (Update: 2023-11-26)