谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑评测--谷歌改进平板电脑，提供更好的 iPad

Name: Google Pixel Tablet
Brand: Google

平板电脑市场的革命？

通过 Pixel 平板电脑，谷歌为Apple iPad 10 或Galaxy Tab S9 提供了一个令人兴奋的替代产品。10.95 英寸的 Pixel 平板电脑不仅是一款经典的平板电脑，而且与其扩展坞一起，还是一个智能家居中枢或带有 XXL 显示屏的智能扬声器（如Apple 的 HomePod）。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/05/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Tablet Audio

谷歌希望通过其 Pixel 平板电脑改变平板电脑爱好者使用设备的方式。平板电脑通常被视为笔记本电脑的替代品，并附带键盘盖，但谷歌的情况并非如此。相反，这家美国制造商提供的是一种多功能的一体化解决方案，由经典平板电脑、智能家居中枢和智能扬声器组成。Pixel tab 可以通过磁力或 Pogo 销钉固定在扩展坞上。

平板电脑本身配备了 10.95 英寸 IPS 显示屏和谷歌张量 G2.内存为 8 GB，UFS 3.1 存储空间为 128 GB 或 256 GB。与美国的诱人定价（499 美元）不同，德国的零售价为 679 欧元（零售价），包括扩展坞。

Test device courtesy of Google Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel Tablet (Pixel Tablet Series)

Processor

Google Tensor G2 8 x 1.8 - 2.9 GHz, Cortex X1 / A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G710 MP7

Memory

8 GB

Display

10.95 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 276 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 111 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, hall, Miracast, OTG, UWB

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 258 x 169

Battery

27 Wh, 7020 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2, 1,12 μm, fixfocus)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2, 1,12 μm, fixfocus)

Additional features

Speakers: Quad-Audio system, Keyboard: OnScreen, dock, charger (for dock), info material, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless

Weight

493 g

Price

679 Euro

Amazon

$279.00

Links

Google homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Google Pixel Tablet Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7	493 g	8.1 mm	10.95"	2560x1600
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	OnePlus Pad Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10	552 g	6.5 mm	11.61"	2800x2000
90.2 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	507 g	6.3 mm	11.00"	2560x1600
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Apple iPad 10 A14, A14 Bionic GPU	477 g	7 mm	10.90"	2360x1640
89.7 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 SD 870, Adreno 650	449 g	5.9 mm	11.00"	2560x1600

案例 - 谷歌平板电脑和再生金属

在欧盟，重 493 克的 Pixel 平板电脑有两种颜色：米色（Porcelain）和灰色（Hazel）。外壳由再生铝制成，但谷歌平板电脑并没有金属质感。设备背面的表面材料是哑光的，有点天鹅绒的感觉，非常防指纹。我们认为，与玻璃材料或阳极氧化铝表面相比，背面的触感可能会众说纷纭。不过，就良好的制造质量而言，整体印象无可挑剔。

根据制造商的数据表，Pixel 平板电脑的正面采用了防污涂层，但没有透露有关采用保护玻璃的细节。值得一提的是，一些在线商店称谷歌平板电脑采用了大猩猩玻璃 3。设备正面的屏占比高达 79.7。不过，就我们的口味而言，显示屏边框应该再纤细一些。与 Galaxy 平板电脑 S8近 84% 的屏占比相比，Pixel 平板明显落了下风。遗憾的是，谷歌平板电脑没有获得防止灰尘或水渗入的特殊认证。

尺寸比较

Google Pixel Tablet OnePlus Pad Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Apple iPad 10 Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 DIN A5 ❌

功能 - Pixel 平板电脑有一个快速 USB 端口

由于操作系统和一些预装应用程序的原因，我们评测设备的 128 GB UFS 3.1 存储可用容量为 111 GB。由于无法使用 microSD 卡扩展存储空间，因此需要更多空间存储视频或照片的用户只能借助记忆棒或 USB OTG 等外围设备。

通过安装的 USB 3.2 端口（第一代），数据传输速度可达 5 GBit/s，理论上还可以借助适配器将图像信号输出到外部显示器。不过，我们无法在显示器和 Pixel 平板电脑之间建立连接。谷歌似乎没有创建必要的软件相关要求。尽管如此，至少可以通过 Miracast 进行无线数据传输。此外，使用 "附近共享 "功能，照片和视频等信息可以从 Pixel 平板电脑发送到附近的Android 智能手机上。

除此之外，Pixel 平板电脑还配备了四个扬声器和三个麦克风，以及用于精确测量距离的超宽带芯片。平板电脑不仅可以通过附带的底座充电，还可以切换到所谓的集线器模式，将设备变成智能显示器。例如，在集线器模式下，Pixel 平板电脑可用作数码相框或智能家居的控制中心。由于支持 Chromecast，还可以将音乐和视频从Android 智能手机无线传输到 Pixel 平板电脑。

软件 - 谷歌平板电脑提供 5 年更新服务

在我们的测试中，Pixel 平板电脑基于当前的Android 13，包括 8 月份的安全补丁，并且从添加到谷歌商店起至少 5 年内都会收到更新。不过，这只适用于安全补丁。Android 版本更新至少保证到 2026 年 6 月，换句话说，也就是三年。有了更新保证，这意味着谷歌仍然落后于三星，后者承诺为其Galaxy Tab S9 机型提供四代Android OS 升级。

与三星平板电脑Knox Vault 平台类似，Pixel 平板电脑也配备了 Titan M2 安全芯片，据说可以通过机器学习保护用户的敏感数据。

由于谷歌不太注重生产力，因此没有采用桌面风格的 UI 也是可以理解的，比如在三星或联想设备上看到的 UI。尽管如此，Pixel 平板电脑还是可以通过Android 菜单或锁屏快速切换多个用户账户，这也更符合基座概念。

通信 - 谷歌标签和 WiFi 6

Pixel 平板电脑使用 MIMO 流程，以确保一流的接收效果。然而，谷歌平板电脑只选择了 Wi-Fi 6。对于这个价位的平板电脑，我们至少希望它能支持 6 Ghz 频段的 Wi-Fi 传输。Wi-Fi 6E 的竞争对手，如一加平板电脑等 Wi-Fi-6E 竞争产品的带宽要大得多。不过，Pixel 平板电脑的速度还是不错的。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时，我们测得的峰值速度超过了 900 MBit/s，而在发送数据时，我们的平均速度仅为 690 MBit/s--这是因为在我们的分析过程中，传输速度曾一度降至 250 MBit/s以下。

除 Wi-Fi 6 外，还提供蓝牙 5.2，但缺少 GNSS 模块和蜂窝连接。对于通过 Wi-Fi 进行的视频通话，谷歌采用了居中对焦功能，目的是确保用户在通话过程中，即使四处走动，也能始终保持在画面的中间位置。不过，只有 Google Meet 支持这项功能。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	1696 (1635^min - 1722^max) MBit/s +93%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	881 (690^min - 925^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	741 (621^min - 759^max) MBit/s -16%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	735 (687^min - 788^max) MBit/s -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	715 (339^min - 767^max) MBit/s -19%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	1710 (1696^min - 1724^max) MBit/s +148%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	893 (775^min - 941^max) MBit/s +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	843 (599^min - 944^max) MBit/s +22%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	816 (764^min - 851^max) MBit/s +18%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	690 (241^min - 849^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1802 (884^min - 1853^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1611 (1577^min - 1636^max) MBit/s

Google Pixel Tablet Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (690-925)

OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1696 (1635-1722)

Google Pixel Tablet Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø690 (241-849)

OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1708 (1696-1724)

摄像头 - Pixel 平板电脑缺乏自动对焦功能

令人失望的是，前后摄像头采用了相同的镜头，但都没有自动对焦功能。两个摄像头的分辨率均为 800 万像素，光圈均为ƒ/2.0。对于一款中高档平板电脑来说，我们很难理解这种降低成本的做法，至少在后置镜头方面是如此。即使是 200 美元以下的入门级平板电脑都配备了包括自动对焦功能在内的更高分辨率摄像头。

我们测试照片的质量不言而喻，没有一张照片的清晰度达到应有的水平。Pixel 平板电脑甚至不能被推荐用于快速抓拍。后置摄像头模块最多只能用于拍摄文档或笔记，但即使在这种情况下，也必须确保与镜头的距离准确无误。由于采用了非常大的 DIN 格式，而且与拍摄对象的距离较远，因此对于 800 万像素的摄像头来说，情况已经开始变得十分严峻。即使在录制视频时，最高分辨率也只能达到 1080p 和 30 fps。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

wide angle wide angle low light zoom 5x

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

相比之下，Pixel 平板电脑的照片色彩非常准确。在受控照明条件下，我们分析了 800 万像素摄像头的色彩还原与实际参考色彩的对比。在我们的 ColorChecker passport 测试中，谷歌平板电脑没有显示任何色彩缺陷（Delta E 值大于 10）。只有绿松石色的还原有些不准确。

配件和保修 - 谷歌平板电脑配有一个扩展坞

Pixel 平板电脑随附一个基座、一个合适的 15 瓦充电器（用于基座）以及有关安全和有限保修信息的小册子。此外，内置扬声器的充电底座可单独购买，售价 129 美元（建议零售价）。同样，还可以购买谷歌保护套（零售价：79 美元）和 Speck StandyShell 保护套（零售价：49 美元）。

在德国，谷歌提供两年有限标准保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - Pixel 平板电脑和手写笔输入

在 10.95 英寸 IPS 面板上可准确实现手指输入。不过，由于普通屏幕的刷新率为 60 Hz，浏览时的滚动或动画显示不如 Tab S8 那样流畅。 Galaxy Tab S8.除了手指输入外，还可以使用支持 USI 2.0 协议（通用手写笔协议）的手写笔与设备进行交互。

开/关机按钮中的指纹扫描仪工作可靠，能以可爱的动画将 Pixel 平板电脑从待机模式唤醒。不过，锁定过程似乎有点慢。通过前置摄像头无法使用生物面部识别解锁功能。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - Google Pixel 平板电脑采用 IPS 显示屏

Pixel Tablet 采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和一个绿光二极管组成。

对显示屏情有独钟的用户肯定不会对 Pixel Tablet 感到满意，但对 PWM 敏感的用户则会感到满意，因为在采用液晶显示屏的情况下，不会出现明显的低频显示屏闪烁现象。IPS 面板及其 1600p 分辨率实现了 274 ppi 的像素密度，刷新帧频仅为 60 Hz。因此，Pixel 平板电脑与 iPad 10 处于同一水平。Apple iPad 10但在Android 这个价位段，还有 120 Hz 或 144 Hz 可供选择。

在亮度测量方面，IPS 面板的平均亮度为 508 cd/m²，全屏为白色，这在同价位产品中是相当令人满意的。与OLED 竞争对手谷歌平板电脑的 APL18 测量值最高为 529 cd/m²，并没有真正提高。IPS 的典型弱点，如边缘阴影或光线不均，在谷歌设备上并不特别明显。


535 cd/m²	527 cd/m²	478 cd/m²
534 cd/m²	521 cd/m²	489 cd/m²
521 cd/m²	493 cd/m²	474 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 535 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 508 cd/m² Minimum: 1.92 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 521 cd/m²
Contrast: 1022:1 (Black: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Google Pixel Tablet IPS, 2560x1600, 11"	OnePlus Pad IPS, 2800x2000, 11.6"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G LCD, 2560x1600, 11"	Apple iPad 10 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"	Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 AMOLED, 2560x1600, 11"
Screen		-38%	-16%	-17%	0%
Brightness middle	521	474 -9%	551 6%	467 -10%	584 12%
Brightness	508	447 -12%	536 6%	468 -8%	574 13%
Brightness Distribution	89	89 0%	93 4%	92 3%	91 2%
Black Level *	0.51	0.32 37%	0.6 -18%	0.49 4%
Contrast	1022	1481 45%	918 -10%	953 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	3.16 -163%	1.4 -17%	1.4 -17%	1.03 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.6	5.37 -107%	5.6 -115%	3.3 -27%	2.64 -2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.3	2.5 -92%	1.1 15%	2.3 -77%	1.8 -38%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.09 ^105%	2.15 ^102%	2.21 ^100%	2.159 ^102%
CCT	6696 ^97%	7112 ^91%	6621 ^98%	6852 ^95%	6744 ^96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1108 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 1108 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 1108 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

一系列具有固定变焦级别和各种亮度设置的测量。

IPS 面板的黑度为 0.51 cd/m²，对比度约为 1,000:1，非常稳定，但与 OnePlus Pad 相比并不出众。OnePlus Pad.这款中档平板电脑有两种色彩配置文件，色温无法调节。如果需要，光线传感器会根据环境光线自动调整色彩还原。

我们使用 Calman 分析软件分析了 IPS 面板的色彩校准。我们测得的 sRGB 色彩空间 DeltaE 值突出显示了极低的色彩和灰度偏差（<2）。这意味着与参考色彩相比，差异几乎不明显。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16.66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.335 ms rise
16.66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.32 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
35.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Pixel 平板电脑能很好地应对日常户外环境。在阳光直射下，由于显示屏亮度稳定，内容依然清晰可辨，但一般情况下最好避免玻璃表面反光。

IPS 面板的可视角度稳定性不错，但从广角来看，亮度会明显下降。色彩没有明显变化。

性能 - 谷歌平板电脑配备了 Tensor SoC

谷歌选择在 Pixel 平板电脑上使用其第二代内部 SoC，即张量 G2和 8GB LPDDR5 内存。我们的Pixel 7 Pro的评测已经表明，谷歌芯片组跟不上目前的高端处理器目前的高端处理器然而，在日常操作中，Pixel 平板电脑给人留下了自信的印象，在我们的 CPU 基准测试中，它在 Pixel 系列智能手机的良好成绩基础上更上一层楼。

特别是在 Geekbench 单核跑分测试中，谷歌平板电脑的 Cortex X1 内核无法与联发科 Dimensity 9000及其 Cortex X2 Ultra 甚至是Apple A14 仿生.但是，多核分数或 Antutu 基准测试也凸显了 Pixel 平板电脑与 OnePlus Pad 之间的显著性能差距。一加平板电脑.

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Google Pixel Tablet	3667 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (3383 - 3967, n=4)	3638 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=69, last 2 years)	3575 Points -3%
Single-Core
Average Google Tensor G2 (1428 - 1480, n=4)	1452 Points +1%
Google Pixel Tablet	1435 Points
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=69, last 2 years)	1121 Points -22%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 10	1580 Points +47%
OnePlus Pad	1279 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1226 Points +14%
Google Pixel Tablet	1078 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (1036 - 1078, n=4)	1053 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	943 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)	712 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 10	4027 Points +25%
OnePlus Pad	3998 Points +24%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	3362 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	3269 Points +2%
Google Pixel Tablet	3212 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (3093 - 3265, n=4)	3198 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)	2508 Points -22%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad	935522 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	927884 Points +46%
Average Google Tensor G2 (619727 - 773857, n=5)	692109 Points +9%
Apple iPad 10	691084 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	677914 Points +7%
Google Pixel Tablet	635893 Points
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points -26%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus Pad	15951 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	13740 Points +29%
Average Google Tensor G2 (10530 - 11736, n=5)	11184 Points +5%
Google Pixel Tablet	10638 Points
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years)	9873 Points -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	9827 Points -8%

CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus Pad	1114 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1069 Points +20%
Apple iPad 10	987 Points +11%
Average Google Tensor G2 (886 - 934, n=5)	900 Points +1%
Google Pixel Tablet	889 Points
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)	779 Points -12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	732 Points -18%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus Pad	7453 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	6908 Points +8%
Google Pixel Tablet	6419 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (5704 - 6419, n=5)	6057 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	6043 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=58, last 2 years)	4238 Points -34%
Apple iPad 10	Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	10926 Points +22%
OnePlus Pad	10635 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	10334 Points +16%
Google Pixel Tablet	8938 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (7803 - 9601, n=5)	8791 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=58, last 2 years)	7305 Points -18%
Memory
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	7694 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	6940 Points +6%
OnePlus Pad	6873 Points +5%
Google Pixel Tablet	6548 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (4556 - 6548, n=5)	5416 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=58, last 2 years)	4900 Points -25%
Graphics
OnePlus Pad	22155 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	18998 Points +16%
Google Pixel Tablet	16372 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (15766 - 16375, n=5)	16151 Points -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	12445 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=58, last 2 years)	9295 Points -43%
Web
OnePlus Pad	1906 Points +11%
Average Google Tensor G2 (1720 - 1838, n=5)	1750 Points +2%
Google Pixel Tablet	1721 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1581 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	1348 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=58, last 2 years)	1272 Points -26%

AImark - Score v3.x
OnePlus Pad	27367 Points +2985%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +722%
Google Pixel Tablet	887 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (496 - 1008, n=5)	840 Points -5%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel Tablet	44323 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (37656 - 44323, n=5)	42050 Points -5%
OnePlus Pad	29879 Points -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	17904 Points -60%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years)	11456 Points -74%

Legend

Google Pixel Tablet Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10,

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Google Tensor G2

Average of class Tablet

在 GPU 密集型测试中，Tensor G2张量 G2集成了 Mali-G710 MP7在 GPU 密集型测试中，集成了 Mali-G710 MP7 的 Tensor G2 与竞争对手相比略胜一筹，但这也是一加平板电脑的领先优势。上一代三星Galaxy Tab在 3DMark 和 GFXBench 测试中也取得了相当高的分数。Adreno 730.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2310 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2205 Points +20%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	2124 Points +15%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1839 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1216 Points -34%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2377 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2287 Points +27%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	2250 Points +25%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1803 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1230 Points -32%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9052 Points +37%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	8539 Points +29%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	8497 Points +29%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6599 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4244 Points -36%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8630 Points +30%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	7933 Points +19%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6649 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4243 Points -36%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	9689 Points +8%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8948 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8945 Points 0%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14871 Points +28%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	12658 Points +9%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11589 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	5321 Points +7%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4983 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3735 Points -25%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	60 fps 0%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps 0%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	381 fps +25%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	317 fps +4%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	305 fps
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	246 fps -19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	230 fps -25%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps +92%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps +27%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	60 fps 0%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	209 fps +19%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	177 fps +1%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	175 fps
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	171 fps -2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	132 fps -25%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps +57%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	58 fps +4%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -5%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	51 fps -9%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	146 fps +29%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	128 fps +13%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	120 fps +6%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps -17%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +21%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	45 fps +15%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -18%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	32 fps -18%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83 fps +24%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	75 fps +12%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	73 fps +9%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -13%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps +13%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	34 fps +13%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	26 fps -13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps -30%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	37 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps +13%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	32 fps +3%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -29%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps +16%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	47 fps +9%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	36 fps -16%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -23%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	94 fps +22%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	93 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps +13%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -25%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	17 fps +21%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	16 fps +14%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10 fps -29%

在使用 Chrome 浏览器时，谷歌平板电脑给人留下了非常好的印象。尽管采用的是 60 Hz 显示屏，但浏览速度一流，没有任何卡顿现象。与 GPU 和 CPU 测试一样，Pixel 平板电脑的基准测试成绩有时明显低于竞争对手。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	178.932 Points +52%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	148.115 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	121.695 Points +3%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	117.838 Points
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years)	109.8 Points -7%
Average Google Tensor G2 (96.3 - 117.8, n=5)	104.7 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)	63.9 Points -46%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	158 Points +61%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	147 Points +50%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years)	105.2 Points +7%
Average Google Tensor G2 (90 - 111, n=5)	98.6 Points +1%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	98 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)	72 Points -27%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	214 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	155 Points +16%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=44, last 2 years)	151.7 Points +13%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	134 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (98 - 134, n=3)	110 Points -18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)	94 Points -30%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	272 runs/min +103%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	134 runs/min
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	119 runs/min -11%
Average Google Tensor G2 (100 - 134, n=5)	118 runs/min -12%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=62, last 2 years)	116.9 runs/min -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	116 runs/min -13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)	53.6 runs/min -60%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	59963 Points +25%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	50429 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	48205 Points +1%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	47939 Points
Average Google Tensor G2 (43817 - 47939, n=5)	45221 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)	33003 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=85, last 2 years)	28868 Points -40%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)	3794 ms * -308%
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 (Huawei Browser 12.1.3)	1354.5 ms * -46%
Average Google Tensor G2 (920 - 1075, n=5)	992 ms * -7%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	930.2 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	864.6 ms * +7%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	797.7 ms * +14%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	547 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

与竞争对手相比，UFS 3.1 存储器的速度其实并不破纪录，这主要归功于 Tensor-SoC 的内存控制器性能较弱。确定的数值处于较低水平，尤其是在以 307 MB/s 的速度写入时。

	Google Pixel Tablet	OnePlus Pad	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		141%	63%	24%	38%	14%
Sequential Read 256KB	1473.3	1866.48 27%	1517.98 3%	1615 10%	1602 ?(1030 - 3134, n=60) 9%	1055 ?(163 - 3912, n=73, last 2 years) -28%
Sequential Write 256KB	307.57	1616.83 426%	1026.82 234%	730.7 138%	748 ?(233 - 1332, n=60) 143%	692 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=73, last 2 years) 125%
Random Read 4KB	219.43	341.39 56%	263.23 20%	171.3 -22%	243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=60) 11%	191 ?(18.4 - 451, n=73, last 2 years) -13%
Random Write 4KB	274.59	420.93 53%	256.83 -6%	187.8 -32%	244 ?(121.4 - 503, n=60) -11%	191.4 ?(8.23 - 555, n=73, last 2 years) -30%

游戏 - Pixel 平板电脑支持 60fps 速率

继 GPU 基准捆绑之后ARM Mali G710 MP7现在必须在日常游戏设置中证明自己。通过GameBench应用程序，我们记录了 Pixel 平板电脑在选定的Android 游戏中的精确刷新率。由于 IPS 面板的刷新率较低，谷歌平板电脑基本上只能达到 60fps。

在当前最高的 UHD 图形设置下，《PUBG mobile》的运行帧率为 40fps，而在细节较低的情况下，显示屏支持的 60fps 是可以实现的。Armajet 还能实现与面板原生刷新率相同的帧速率。

Google Pixel Tablet; Armajet: Ø59.9 (55-61)

Google Pixel Tablet; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.6 (58-61)

Google Pixel Tablet; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.5 (58-61)

Google Pixel Tablet; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.5 (56-61)

Google Pixel Tablet; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (38-41)

排放 - 谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑几乎不会节流

温度

在负载情况下，Pixel 平板电脑的外壳几乎不会发热。我们记录的最高温度为 38 °，属于无害范围。内部产生的热量也没有降低 Tensor-SoC 的性能。Wild Life 压力测试清楚地表明，随着负载的增加，性能下降约 2%。

3DMark Wild Life stress test

Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø38.8 (37.8-39.7)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø41.2 (35.1-48.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.1 (37.3-50)

Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø42.4 (41.9-48.6)

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.2 (25.1-25.3)

Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11.1 (11-11.1)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø12.5 (12-14.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.9 (10.2-13.4)

Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø11.8 (11.6-13.5)

Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.35 (7.34-7.37)

Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.4 (42.4-51.8)

Max. Load

Idle


34.6 °C	35.4 °C	34.8 °C
31.7 °C	32.5 °C	32.3 °C
30.2 °C	30.2 °C	31.3 °C

Maximum: 35.4 °C
Average: 32.6 °C


34.7 °C	37.9 °C	38.4 °C
31.3 °C	33.7 °C	31.6 °C
29.9 °C	30.6 °C	30.1 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 33.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

Das Pixel 平板电脑拥有四个扬声器，旨在提供动听的声音。不过，这些扬声器的音量只有 81.6 分贝，并不是特别大。中音和高音似乎非常线性，甚至轻微的低音也出现在音频中。其性能足以满足观看电影或视频的需求。

如果有人想用 Pixel 平板电脑听音乐，肯定会求助于充电底座及其内置扬声器。内置扬声器使用 43.5 毫米的驱动器，音质明显比平板电脑本身更饱满。从这个角度来看，亚马逊 Echo Dot 5 的驱动器为 44 毫米，这意味着 Pixel Dock 的驱动器水平与经济型智能扬声器差不多。Pixel Dock 只有在连接平板电脑时才会发出声音，这意味着无法连接多台设备形成单一音源。

有线耳机或外置扬声器可通过 USB-C 端口连接到 Pixel 平板电脑。蓝牙 5.2 提供无线选项，音频编解码器有 SBC、AAC、LDAC、Opus、LC3 以及高通公司的 aptX 和 aptX HD。

提示：稍后将对 Pixel 平板电脑的扩展坞和相应的粉红噪声进行分析。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel Tablet audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - Pixel 平板电脑的电池容量很小

耗电量

在功耗方面，Pixel 平板电脑在闲置状态下显示出其经济性，然而，在使用华为 MatePad Pro 11 2022 时，它的功耗却有所下降。华为 MatePad Pro 11 2022展示了 AMOLED 面板的性能。在负载情况下，我们测得的峰值功率高达 20 瓦。

Pixel 平板电脑没有配备 USB-C 充电器，而是配备了一个 15 瓦的底座充电器。为了保护已经相当小的电池，在集线器模式下，谷歌平板电脑最多只能充电到 90%。为此，我们需要大约 2.5 个小时才能将电源充满。如果使用合适的电源箱（PD 3.0，100 瓦），Pixel 平板电脑通过 USB 端口充电一小时后，电量可以达到 55% 左右，这两个数字都没有打破记录。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.13 Watt
Idle	1.33 / 4.67 / 4.78 Watt
Load	9.81 / 19.76 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Google Pixel Tablet 7020 mAh	OnePlus Pad 9510 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G 8000 mAh	Apple iPad 10 7606 mAh	Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 8300 mAh
Power Consumption		-44%	22%	-15%	22%
Idle Minimum *	1.33	3.64 -174%	1.19 11%	1.34 -1%	1.9 -43%
Idle Average *	4.67	6.84 -46%	4.38 6%	7.78 -67%	2.2 53%
Idle Maximum *	4.78	7.15 -50%	4.45 7%	7.89 -65%	3 37%
Load Average *	9.81	8.98 8%	7.85 20%	9.05 8%	7.2 27%
Load Maximum *	19.76	11.9 40%	6.67 66%	9.98 49%	12.7 36%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel Tablet Google Tensor G2: Ø6.53 (1.95-11.8)

Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic: Ø7.3 (2.93-13.3)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel Tablet Google Tensor G2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.81 (8.35-9.47)

Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.5 (10-12.6)

Google Pixel Tablet Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.18 (2.11-2.4)

Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.05 (3.02-3.16)

电池寿命

由于采用了 IPS 面板，我们对 Pixel 平板电脑的电池续航时间感到非常惊讶。我们对比的设备在自适应显示亮度为 150 cd/m² 时的续航时间最长。

在实际的 Wi-Fi 测试中，谷歌平板电脑的续航时间分别为 16.5 小时和 20.5 小时，在关闭 Wi-Fi 模块的情况下，连续播放视频的时间为 20.5 小时。这家总部位于美国山景城的制造商能从 7020 毫安时的电池中激发出如此强大的能量实在令人惊叹，即使与 iPad 10 相比也是如此。iPad 10相比也是如此。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		36h 42min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		20h 39min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 31min

	Google Pixel Tablet 7020 mAh	OnePlus Pad 9510 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G 8000 mAh	Apple iPad 10 7606 mAh	Huawei MatePad Pro 11 2022 8300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-29%	-13%	-37%	-11%
Reader / Idle	2202	1345 -39%	2170 -1%	1729 -21%	2103 -4%
H.264	1239	963 -22%	831 -33%	740 -40%	1020 -18%
WiFi v1.3	992	648 -35%	966 -3%	647 -35%	905 -9%
Load	391	310 -21%	331 -15%	191 -51%	336 -14%

Pros

+ 电池寿命长

+ 有趣的使用形式（与底座一起使用）

+ 良好的制造质量

+ 坚固的芯片组（同价位产品中），无节流现象

+ 快速 USB 端口...

Cons

- 无显示输出

- 无 5G 选项

- 只有 60 赫兹面板

- 厚边框

结论 - 谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑

可以肯定的是，谷歌不会通过对 Pixel 的诠释来彻底改变平板电脑市场。但是，在许多方面，这家制造商已经找到了创造连贯的整体概念的正确方法。将平板电脑与包括内置扬声器在内的底座结合在一起的想法当然并不新鲜，但是，谷歌通过轻松切换账户等智能解决方案，将这种使用行为提升到了一个新的水平。

在硬件定位和定价方面，Pixel 平板电脑与 Apple iPad 10.这两款平板电脑都无法满足用户对显示屏的最高要求，但 Pixel 平板电脑采用了层压和亮度更高的 60 Hz 面板，能提供更好的视觉体验。不过，即使不看屏幕，Pixel 平板电脑也能提供更周到的全套服务，电池续航时间更长，功能更全面。

Pixel 平板电脑的概念会让你欲罢不能。希望谷歌也能为平板电脑优化Android 提供资源。

在某些方面，我们仍然看到一些改进的空间，尤其是考虑到其高昂的零售价。厚边框、充电慢和低刷新率显示屏应该在下一代产品中做出相应调整。Pixel 平板电脑必须面对的其他批评还包括缺乏内存扩展选项、5G 支持和 GNSS 模块--尽管这些只是在有限的程度上符合谷歌的整体概念。

如果有人认为扩展坞或集线器模式并不能带来特别的附加值，那么他应该考虑把价格便宜得多但性能并不逊色的小米 Pad 6 列入自己的阅读材料。此外，Galaxy Tab S8 也是谷歌平板电脑的一个有趣替代品。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

Pixel 平板电脑的零售价为 499 美元，可在亚马逊等在线经销商或谷歌商店购买。.

Google Pixel Tablet - 09/02/2023 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

87 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

69 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

45 / 70 → 65%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

91%

Display

89%

Games Performance

67 / 78 → 85%

Application Performance

85 / 92 → 93%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

81 / 91 → 89%

Camera

49 / 85 → 58%

Average

79%

89%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.