小米 Pad 6 评测：大幅改进的平板电脑，支持手写笔，价格同样实惠

Name: Xiaomi Pad 6
Brand: Xiaomi

经济实惠的 iPad 替代品

在我们的评测中，与小米 Pad 5 相比，小米 Pad 6 中端平板电脑在许多方面都有所改进。这款 11 英寸平板电脑价格亲民，配备 144Hz 显示屏、骁龙 SoC、高品质外壳，并支持手写笔。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/20/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Tablet Android

时隔一年之后，小米又向市场推出了其新一代平板电脑系列。尽管与前代产品相比前代入门级版本（6GB、128GB）的建议零售价仍为 399 欧元（约合 434 美元）。那些可以多投资 100 欧元（约合 109 美元）的用户则可以获得 8 GB 内存和 256 GB UFS 3.1 的额外存储空间。

小米 Pad 6 不仅继承了骁龙 870的专业版还兼容 WiFi 6。小米新款中端平板电脑的电池容量为 8840 毫安时，充电功率可达 33 瓦。与之配套的是一块分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素的 11 英寸 LCD 屏幕。与 Pad 5 相比，309 PPI 的像素密度和 144 Hz 的刷新率都有所提高。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Pad 6 (Pad 6 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 8 x 2.4 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

11.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 309 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS LCD, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 107 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, Miracast, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.51 x 253.95 x 165.18

Battery

8840 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2)

Additional features

Speakers: Quad speaker system, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable, info material, charger, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless

Weight

490 g, Power Supply: 93 g

Price

400 Euro

Amazon

$399.99

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Xiaomi Pad 6 SD 870, Adreno 650	490 g	6.51 mm	11.00"	2880x1800
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Xiaomi Pad 5 SD 860, Adreno 640	511 g	6.85 mm	11.00"	2560x1600
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	OnePlus Pad Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10	552 g	6.5 mm	11.61"	2800x2000
82.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	520 g	7.4 mm	11.50"	2000x1200
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	445 g	7.05 mm	10.61"	2000x1200
83.1 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2023	Oppo Pad Air SD 680, Adreno 610	440 g	6.9 mm	10.36"	2000x1200

保护套 - 拥有高品质外观的小米 Pad 6

与上一代产品相比，小米 Pad 6 从设计和材料选择方面进行了大量改进。这款来自小米的中端平板电脑采用一体式机身设计，而不是像 Pad 5.金属外壳有黑色、蓝色和金色三种颜色可供选择。得益于其磨砂表面，指纹不会成为小米 Pad 6 的问题。

2023 小米平板电脑不仅变得略微紧凑，体现在正面 83.6% 的 IPS 面板屏占比更高，而且 490 克（约 1.08 磅）的重量也比上一代产品更轻。此外，小米 Pad 6 的正面还采用了康宁大猩猩 3 号玻璃保护。不过，该保护壳并没有提供官方 IP 认证，所以你不应该在雨中使用这款小米平板电脑。

有趣的是，虽然小米 Pad 6 不能插入任何卡，但在边框上可以看到 SIM 卡的插槽，因此这款中端平板电脑和其相应的支持 5G 的Pro 型号支持 5G 的 Pro 型号似乎共用一个外壳。

尺寸比较

设备 - 配备 USB 3.2 的 Xiaom 平板电脑

凭借新一代平板电脑，小米弥补了其最大的批评点之一 Pad 5在小米 Pad 6 中，USB 2.0 标准被 USB 3.2 连接（第一代）所取代。随机附送的 USB 数据线并不支持 USB 3.0 数据传输，因此购买 Pad 6 的用户仍需在购买后再投入一些资金。使用适配器，该端口还可用作显示输出端口，连接外部显示器。在我们使用连接的 M2 固态硬盘（三星 980 Pro）进行的拷贝测试中，USB 端口的传输速率达到了 290.4 MB/s。

USB 连接还支持 OTG，可连接外部外围设备或存储介质。此外，Miracast 可用于无线传输到外部显示器。

软件 - 配备Android 13 的小米 Pad 6

作为操作系统，小米在Android 13 的基础上安装了自家的 MIUI for Pad 14 用户界面。在我们测试期间，这款中端平板电脑的系统使用的是 2023 年 7 月的安全补丁级别。由于通过了 DRM L1 认证，你可以在 11 英寸的大液晶显示屏上观看高分辨率的流媒体内容。

目前，该平板电脑还没有像全球小米高端智能手机那样的更新保证。不过，小米安全中心列出了 Pad 6 未来的Android 14 和Android 15 版本。据说每季度都会有安全更新，但小米并未提及官方支持期限。该制造商在此价位段的中端智能手机提供三到四年的支持期。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 没有 GPS 的小米平板电脑

相比之下前代小米平板 6 提供了相当快的 WiFi 6，尽管它无法与用于 WLAN 传输的 6 千兆赫频段建立连接。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器配合使用，小米平板电脑的传输速率峰值可达 900 Mbit/s，在 Pad 6 的价格范围内可谓物超所值。

小米平板电脑没有提供用于非接触式支付的 NFC 芯片，但配备了蓝牙 5.2 和用于通过 WLAN 进行视频通话的四个麦克风。小米平板电脑不支持 LTE 或 5G 频率，也不支持 GPS 模块。

与三星的自动取景技术小米平板电脑 Pad 6 采用了居中对焦功能，可确保用户在视频通话时始终处于画面中心，即使在移动过程中也是如此。如果第二个人也加入进来，视野也会相应放大。不过，这一功能并不适用于所有应用程序。在使用 Skype 进行的测试通话中，我们发现前置摄像头的视角非常宽，但视角是固定的。

Networking
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	932 (min: 727) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	880 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼51%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12	635 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	538 (min: 317) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1696 (min: 1635) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1710 (min: 1696) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	409 (min: 366) MBit/s ∼24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	493 (min: 433) MBit/s ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	367 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼22%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 179) MBit/s ∼22%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	306 (min: 289) MBit/s ∼18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	357 (min: 257) MBit/s ∼21%

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø930 (727-966)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø538 (317-618)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø880 (791-925)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø624 (320-652)

摄像头 - 配备单摄像头的小米 Pad 6

与前代产品相比，小米 Pad 6 的摄像头规格表未提及任何变化。前代产品.在显示屏上方，这款 11 英寸平板电脑继续配备了 800 万像素前置摄像头，光圈为 f/2.2，在日光条件下拍摄效果可以接受，视频通话质量也不错。喜欢发送短视频信息的用户可以 1080p 的分辨率发送信息。

背面的 1300 万像素主摄像头可以 30 帧/秒的最高 UHD 画质录制视频。在光线充足的情况下，光圈为 f/2.2 的传感器可提供极具吸引力的图像质量。图像的色彩还原、细节和动态扩展绝对足以满足一些快照的需求，即使 11 英寸平板电脑的用户可能更希望使用背面的摄像头模块来记录文档或笔记。相机应用程序还为此提供了一个特殊模式。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Low Light Zoom 5x

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在可控光线条件下，我们对 1300 万像素传感器的色彩准确性进行了更详细的测试。我们发现，参考色的偏差没有任何真正的异常值（大于 15），大多数颜色都能准确再现。不过，色彩再现总体上略微过亮，白平衡校准略微偏暖。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 6: 6.15 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 12.55 ∆E

配件和保修 - 附带充电器的小米平板电脑

这款中端平板电脑的包装盒包括一个 33 瓦模块化充电器和一条 USB 线缆（2.0 标准）。此外，小米还为 Pad 6 提供了一支兼容的第二代智能笔，压力级别为 4,096 级，电池续航时间长达 150 小时，作为额外配件，建议零售价约为 100 欧元（约合 109 美元）。此外，还可选配键盘盖，售价约为 90 欧元（约合人民币 98 元）。

小米平板电脑在德国的保修期为 24 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 不带指纹传感器的小米 Pad 6

11 英寸 IPS 面板覆盖大猩猩 3 号玻璃，可快速、精确地执行手指输入。得益于 144 Hz 的刷新率，浏览器中的滚动手势或图形用户界面动画都能非常流畅地显示。遗憾的是，我们无法测试小米 Pad 6 在日常使用 13 克（约 0.45 盎司）的 Smart Pen 2 时的表现。

目前这一代小米 Pad 仍然没有提供指纹扫描仪。前置摄像头可通过生物人脸识别解锁，最多可存储两张人脸。在日光条件下，相当不安全的 2D 人脸识别的响应速度和识别率都令人信服，但在光线较弱和显示屏变暗的情况下，其工作就不那么可靠了。对于兼容的小米可穿戴设备或智能手机，还可以通过 "可信设备 "实现智能解锁功能。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 采用 IPS 面板的小米平板电脑

11 英寸液晶面板的分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素，最高刷新率可达 144 Hz。为了省电，系统还可以选择自动调整刷新率（144 Hz、90 Hz、60 Hz）--我们可以从系统信息中收集这些值。有趣的是，即使刷新率固定在 144 Hz，在短时间内没有任何手指输入后，刷新率也会降低到 50 Hz。屏幕采用 RGB 矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。

根据制造商的说法，最大亮度可达 550 尼特，我们在 APL18 测试中的测量结果也证实了这一点，亮度为 543 cd/m²。在纯白显示屏和激活亮度传感器的情况下，小米平板 6 的显示屏平均亮度接近 500 cd/m²，在这个价位的产品中也算是不错的了，但对于 HDR 材料的最佳显示效果来说仍然不够。

我们无法检测到液晶面板的 PWM 闪烁，因此小米平板电脑应该特别适合对 PWM 敏感的用户。


484 cd/m²	493 cd/m²	481 cd/m²
498 cd/m²	541 cd/m²	484 cd/m²
489 cd/m²	498 cd/m²	481 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 541 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 494.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.65 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 541 cd/m²
Contrast: 832:1 (Black: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26

	Xiaomi Pad 6 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 11"	Xiaomi Pad 5 IPS, 2560x1600, 11"	OnePlus Pad IPS, 2800x2000, 11.6"	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad IPS, 2000x1200, 10.6"	Oppo Pad Air IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Screen		-54%	-53%	-153%	-53%	-144%
Brightness middle	541	491 -9%	474 -12%	423 -22%	418 -23%	352 -35%
Brightness	494	473 -4%	447 -10%	396 -20%	402 -19%	339 -31%
Brightness Distribution	89	91 2%	89 0%	88 -1%	90 1%	85 -4%
Black Level *	0.65	0.87 -34%	0.32 51%	0.29 55%	0.28 57%	0.45 31%
Contrast	832	564 -32%	1481 78%	1459 75%	1493 79%	782 -6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.9	1.9 -111%	3.16 -251%	5.32 -491%	2.3 -156%	4.79 -432%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.8	4.1 -128%	5.37 -198%	9.87 -448%	5.4 -200%	8.65 -381%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.4	3 -114%	2.5 -79%	6.6 -371%	3.7 -164%	5.5 -293%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.21 ^100%	2.09 ^105%	2.159 ^102%	2.21 ^100%	2.118 ^104%
CCT	6710 ^97%	7182 ^91%	7112 ^91%	7979 ^81%	6595 ^99%	7889 ^82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

181600 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 181600 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 181600 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

小米 Pad 5 的弱点之一是小米平板 5的弱点之一是液晶面板对比度低。据说小米 Pad 5 的后继机型将在这方面有所改进，其对比度值达到了 1400:1。然而，由于 0.65 cd/m² 的黑色值相当高，我们无法确认这一明显的对比度，尽管 830:1 的小米 Pad 6 在这方面与前代产品相比仍有所改进。

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和照片光谱仪对通过 HDR10 认证的 IPS 面板的色彩校准进行了评估。Original Pro "配置文件以 sRGB 色彩空间为目标，几乎完全覆盖。我们看到色彩偏差非常小，我们测量的 DeltaE 值显示灰度偏差非常小。小米平板 6 还提供了两个额外的色彩配置文件，以及针对更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间的选项。但正如我们所料，这里的色彩还原偏差略高。

此外，通过扩展设置还可以调整色彩空间和色温，以及饱和度等个别参数。亮度传感器还可以根据光线条件自动调节色彩还原。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.167 ms rise
16.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.64 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.27 ms rise
35.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.89 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在户外，这款中档平板电脑给人留下了良好的印象。尽管亮度无法弥补强光下的反光，但在部分阴暗处仍能阅读液晶显示屏上的内容。可视角度的稳定性也非常吸引人，即使在陡峭的可视角度下，亮度也只会有微小的下降。

性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的小米 Pad 6

高通高通骁龙 870小米平板 6 采用的 SoC 集成了八个内核，分布在三个集群中。最快的 Cortex A77 内核主频高达 3.2 GHz，性能集群的三个 Cortex A77 内核主频高达 2.42 GHz，省电集群的四个高效 Cortex A55 内核主频高达 1.8 GHz。处理器 Adreno 650显卡。

虽然系统速度非常不错，但我们仍不时看到一些小的系统卡顿。在我们的基准测试中，尽管OnePlus Pad配备了 Dimensity 9000提供了更高的性能。与前代产品相比，小米 Pad 6 的 Geekbench 测试结果提高了约 20%。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
OnePlus Pad	1279 Points +28%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1003 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (943 - 1046, n=16)	989 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 5	784 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	558 Points -44%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	490 Points -51%
Oppo Pad Air	381 Points -62%
Multi-Core
OnePlus Pad	3998 Points +20%
Xiaomi Pad 6	3328 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (2725 - 4455, n=16)	3245 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 5	2768 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1889 Points -43%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	1797 Points -46%
Oppo Pad Air	1625 Points -51%

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)	3518 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 6	3357 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G ()	3357 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5	3038 Points -10%
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6	1299 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G ()	1299 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)	1093 Points -16%
Xiaomi Pad 5	1037 Points -20%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad	935522 Points +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (581322 - 716502, n=13)	682849 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 6	581322 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5	575553 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)	464403 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	316212 Points -46%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	312314 Points -46%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus Pad	15951 Points +16%
Xiaomi Pad 6	13728 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (9827 - 16054, n=15)	12937 Points -6%
Xiaomi Pad 5	11318 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9812 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	9578 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9475 Points -31%
Oppo Pad Air	6423 Points -53%

CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus Pad	1114 Points +48%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (719 - 844, n=8)	762 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6	754 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5	635 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	575 Points -24%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	568 Points -25%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus Pad	7453 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5289 - 6369, n=13)	5926 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6	5289 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5	5154 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2988 Points -44%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	2855 Points -46%
System
OnePlus Pad	10635 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (8463 - 10489, n=13)	9469 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 5	8805 Points +4%
Xiaomi Pad 6	8463 Points
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	6509 Points -23%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	5261 Points -38%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (5689 - 8167, n=13)	7166 Points +17%
OnePlus Pad	6873 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6	6127 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5	5788 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	3550 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	3454 Points -44%
Graphics
OnePlus Pad	22155 Points +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (10386 - 12801, n=13)	12016 Points +7%
Xiaomi Pad 6	11263 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5	10293 Points -9%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2875 Points -74%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	2762 Points -75%
Web
OnePlus Pad	1906 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1315 - 1791, n=13)	1517 Points +14%
Xiaomi Pad 5	1346 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1336 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	1325 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1201 Points -10%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
OnePlus Pad	29879 Points +81%
Xiaomi Pad 6	16501 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (12855 - 18000, n=8)	16424 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11329 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	9218 Points -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9213 Points -44%

Legend

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10,

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Oppo Pad Air Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G

Average of class Tablet

在 3DMark 图形测试中，小米 Pad 6 和 OnePlus Pad 6 之间的性能差异如下一加平板电脑和 OnePlus Pad 的性能差异更加明显，而在 GFXBench 测量中，两款平板电脑的差异有时达到 50%。由于分辨率较低，小米 Pad 5 小米平板 5的 Adreno 650的后继者在屏幕上的数值。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2310 Points +87%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1233 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	970 Points -21%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	330 Points -73%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	329 Points -73%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	125 Points -90%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2377 Points +91%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1246 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	985 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	343 Points -72%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	342 Points -73%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	124 Points -90%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	8497 Points +100%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4252 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3436 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1215 Points -71%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1109 Points -74%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -89%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	7933 Points +85%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4293 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3428 Points -20%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1242 Points -71%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1237 Points -71%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	452 Points -89%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	9689 Points +32%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7363 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6981 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2644 Points -64%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1359 Points -82%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	12658 Points +47%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8593 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8202 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2442 Points -72%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1184 Points -86%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	5321 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4882 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4590 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3717 Points -24%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2807 Points -43%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps -45%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	55 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	246 fps +36%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	184 fps +2%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps -65%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +10%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps +2%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -41%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	177 fps +50%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -66%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -66%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	51 fps +55%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +21%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -30%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -30%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	128 fps +58%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps -69%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps -69%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	32 fps +52%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps +19%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -38%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -38%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	73 fps +49%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -69%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -69%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	26 fps +53%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.5 fps -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps -51%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.3 fps -69%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	37 fps +85%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps -10%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps -73%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -84%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	36 fps +64%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +18%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps -45%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps -60%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	93 fps +75%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -11%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -74%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.7 fps -82%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	17 fps +75%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.5 fps -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.4 fps -75%
Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1.4 fps -86%

与 CPU 和 GPU 测试一样，小米 Pad 6 在浏览器基准测试中也表现出色。在日常操作中，这款中端平板电脑也没有表现出任何弱点。网站渲染速度很快，滚动也很流畅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	148.115 Points +70%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (60.7 - 108.3, n=12)	87.7 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	86.985 Points
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	73 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	55.947 Points -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	55.842 Points -36%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	158 Points +68%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points +11%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	94 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (46 - 107, n=4)	79.8 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	57 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	56 Points -40%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	149.6 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (chrome 115)	134 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (94 - 155, n=13)	127.5 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	96 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	84 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	80 Points -40%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	119 runs/min +73%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min +68%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	68.93 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (51.4 - 77, n=12)	67.2 runs/min -3%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	61.3 runs/min -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	38.1 runs/min -45%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chome 112)	31 runs/min -55%

Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	50429 Points +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (20543 - 41256, n=13)	33246 Points +8%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	30783 Points
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points -7%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	28456 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	17557 Points -43%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	17239 Points -44%
Oppo Pad Air (Chrome 109)	12402 Points -60%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -147%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	2443.7 ms * -60%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	2268.5 ms * -48%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)	1603 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	1532.1 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1055 - 1792, n=13)	1401 ms * +9%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	797.7 ms * +48%

* ... smaller is better

在存储速度方面，小米 Pad 6 的成绩与 USF 3.1 竞争对手相当。不过，尤其是在读写小数据块时，AndroBench 的结果要明显优于前代产品。

	Xiaomi Pad 6	Xiaomi Pad 5	OnePlus Pad	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	Xiaomi Redmi Pad	Oppo Pad Air	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-30%	45%	-38%	-14%	-33%	-10%	-30%
Sequential Read 256KB	1673.97	1459 -13%	1866.48 12%	822.4 -51%	976.9 -42%	921.6 -45%	1600 ?(1030 - 3134, n=59) -4%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) -38%
Sequential Write 256KB	745.32	534 -28%	1616.83 117%	490.6 -34%	883.6 19%	717 -4%	756 ?(233 - 1332, n=59) 1%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -8%
Random Read 4KB	298.45	208.7 -30%	341.39 14%	204.8 -31%	250.82 -16%	177.1 -41%	244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=59) -18%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -37%
Random Write 4KB	304.34	158.9 -48%	420.93 38%	201.3 -34%	257.02 -16%	172.8 -43%	243 ?(121.4 - 503, n=59) -20%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -38%

游戏 - 小米 Pad 6 仅达到 60 帧/秒

为了评估 Adreno 650为了评估 Adreno 650 在日常运行中的图形处理能力，我们使用GameBench 应用程序仔细查看了 Play Store 中的两款游戏。尽管硬件功能强大，144 Hz 的面板刷新频率也很高，但在理论上支持 IPS 显示屏全帧率的Armajet 竞技场射击游戏中，我们的帧数只能达到 60 帧。不过，这仍然是我们测量发现的小米 Pad 5 每秒帧数的两倍。小米 Pad 5的两倍。在《PUBG Mobile》中，高清设置下也能达到典型的 60 帧/秒，而在最高细节设置（UHD）下，这款中端平板电脑能稳定显示 40 帧/秒。Pad 6 不提供可选的 90 帧模式。

Xiaomi Pad 6; Armajet: Ø59.9 (56-61)

Xiaomi Pad 6; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.9 (58-60)

Xiaomi Pad 6; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.7 (42-60)

Xiaomi Pad 6; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (55-60)

Xiaomi Pad 6; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (38-41)

废气排放 - 小米平板电脑依然相当凉爽

温度

在日常操作过程中，中端平板电脑外壳的发热现象只在某些方面值得一提。我们在负载情况下测量的平均温度为 35.7 °C（96.3 °F）。不过，在与前代产品的温度水平（最高 32.6 °C，90.7 °F）进行比较时，我们还应该提到，我们现在使用 Burnout 基准来测量 Pad 6 的温度，而不是稳定性测试。因此无法再进行精确比较。

为了评估小米平板电脑内部的发热情况，我们使用了 3DMark 的电池测试。Wild Life 压力测试在 80% 以上的恒定负载下顺利完成。因此，即使在持续负载的情况下，我们也无法迫使 Pad 6 出现任何值得一提的严重节流现象，尽管即使是轻微的节流也足以将较新的高通 SoC 与 Pad 5 相比的性能优势几乎完全抹平。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.5 (21.1-25.4)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø41.2 (35.1-48.8)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.44-7.47)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.39-7.47)

Oppo Pad Air Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.7 (2.68-2.71)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø6.27 (6.1-7.39)

Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø12.5 (12-14.1)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.06 (2.05-2.07)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.03-2.07)

Max. Load

Idle


32.9 °C	43.3 °C	41.9 °C
32.6 °C	33.6 °C	38.4 °C
31.3 °C	33.3 °C	33.7 °C

Maximum: 43.3 °C
Average: 35.7 °C


40.1 °C	38.5 °C	35.1 °C
35.1 °C	37 °C	33.6 °C
34.2 °C	33.3 °C	32.6 °C

Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 35.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

小米 Pad 6 提供四个大功率扬声器，音量超过 88 dB(A)。我们非常喜欢这四个扬声器的音质，即使低音的存在感有限。否则，即使超高频在粉红噪声中略有下降，中音平板电脑也能相当线性地再现中音。

有些用户会非常怀念通过 3.5 毫米音频接口输出音频的功能。相反，音频内容必须通过 USB-C 端口的适配器输出。不过，小米并没有提供相应的适配器。通过蓝牙 5.2，可无线选择音频编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX 和 aptX HD 以及 LDAC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Pad 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 功耗升高的小米 Pad 6

耗电量

电池容量为 8840 毫安时，最大充电功率为 33 瓦。使用附带的快速充电器，小米平板 6 可在约 100 分钟内完全充满电。除了专有的 MI-FC 1.0 快速充电外，还支持 PD 3.0 快速充电协议和 QuickCharge 4 等其他标准。

对于一款 11 英寸的平板电脑来说，功耗处于稳定水平。不过，满载情况下的功耗非常明显，超过了 15 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.16 Watt
Idle	0.96 / 4.91 / 5.07 Watt
Load	11.8 / 15.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh	OnePlus Pad 9510 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) 7500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh
Power Consumption		19%	-62%	49%	30%
Idle Minimum *	0.96	0.99 -3%	3.64 -279%	0.9 6%	0.93 3%
Idle Average *	4.91	4.2 14%	6.84 -39%	1.3 74%	4.02 18%
Idle Maximum *	5.07	4.22 17%	7.15 -41%	1.5 70%	4.07 20%
Load Average *	11.8	7.88 33%	8.98 24%	5 58%	5.52 53%
Load Maximum *	15.9	10.63 33%	11.9 25%	10.1 36%	6.89 57%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø6.53 (2.85-11.7)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99: Ø3.68 (2.19-5.75)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.5 (5.98-9.91)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.44 (2.64-3.99)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.14 (2.09-2.9)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.06 (2.02-2.37)

电池寿命

在电池续航时间方面，小米 Pad 6 与前代产品相比没有太大变化。在我们的 WLAN 测试中，在调整显示亮度为 150 cd/m² 的条件下，这款刷新率为 144 Hz 的中端平板电脑可持续使用约 14 小时。在关闭 WLAN 模块的持续视频重现测试中，电池可使 11 英寸 IPS 面板持续运行 12.5 小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		35h 54min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 25min

	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh	OnePlus Pad 9510 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) 7500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh	Oppo Pad Air 7100 mAh
Battery Runtime		11%	-3%	4%	36%	0%
Reader / Idle	2154	2641 23%	1345 -38%	2096 -3%	3640 69%
H.264	741	1000 35%	963 30%	1002 35%	971 31%
WiFi v1.3	823	733 -11%	648 -21%	879 7%	1057 28%	823 0%
Load	265	257 -3%	310 17%	204 -23%	310 17%

Pros

+ 优质触感

+ 明亮的 144-Hz 面板

+ 附带充电器

+ 支持笔

+ 良好的扬声器

+ 升级至 USB 3.2

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 无 5G 型号

- 无法扩展存储空间

- 无指纹识别器

小米平板 6 的评价

测试小米 Pad 6。测试机由 nbb.com (notebooksbilliger.de) 提供。

来自小米的 Pad 6 是一款成功的更新换代产品，也是一款非常出色的中端平板电脑。它的市场建议零售价为 400 欧元（约合人民币 435 元），与上一代产品相比，它在许多方面都有所改进，甚至在许多方面至少与更昂贵的竞争对手相当，如 Apple iPad 10.

在这个价位的产品中，144Hz 显示屏、快速 USB 3.2 连接、钢笔支持和高品质的印象等整体组合非常吸引人。尽管骁龙 870虽然它使用的不是当前最先进的芯片组，性能也达不到 OnePlus Pad的性能水平，但高通 SoC 的速度仍然足以应付日常任务，而且性能也很稳定。

小米 Pad 6 在很多方面都比前代产品做得更好，是中端价位段非常有趣的选择。

为了保持价格的吸引力，小米 Pad 6 的购买者不得不接受一些设备上的妥协，如缺少支持 5G 和定位能力的选项。但在日常操作中，最让人怀念的可能就是指纹传感器了。对于那些离不开指纹传感器的人来说，小米平板电脑的 Pro 型号或许是一个合适的替代品，不过它只能通过进口商购买（售价约为 460 美元），在语言、保修、中文 ROM 等方面可能会受到一些相应的限制。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

在我们进行测试时，小米平板 6 在亚马逊的售价为 359 美元起。作为进口设备（CN 或全球版），该设备的起价约为 341 美元，例如在深圳贸易公司有售。

Xiaomi Pad 6 - 08/16/2023 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

69 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

57 / 70 → 82%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

89%

Display

89%

Games Performance

59 / 78 → 75%

Application Performance

85 / 92 → 92%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 91 → 91%

Camera

56 / 85 → 65%

Average

80%

89%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Pad 6 评测：大幅改进的平板电脑，支持手写笔，价格同样实惠

Marcus Herbrich, 2023-08-20 (Update: 2024-08-15)