三星Galaxy Z Fold 6 评测--配备 S Pen 的防尘可折叠智能手机性能大打折扣
昨天的技术?
Galaxy Z Fold6 是首款通过 IP48 认证的 XXL 可折叠手机。不过,它似乎错过了如今可折叠手机领域明显的纤薄趋势。在这篇评测中,你可以发现这款三星手机是否仍然值得购买。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
今年,三星再次忠实于该系列,其Galaxy Z Fold6 与前代机型相比只做了极少的改进。 Z Fold6 的改进微乎其微。其精巧的重新设计风格与 Galaxy S24 Ultra的风格进行了微妙的重新设计,为这款可折叠手机配备了稍宽的显示屏和更坚固的外壳。除此以外,Z Fold6 并无太大变化,三星似乎想把真正的大变化保留给 超的可折叠系列。
即便如此,Fold6 的价格还是略有上涨。进入 Fold 6 的世界需要花费 1,899.99 美元。在三星商店之外,有 256 GB 和 512 GB 两种存储容量可供选择,三星还直接提供 1 TB 的选择。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.1 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750 | 239 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.60" | 2160x1856 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Vivo X Fold3 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 219 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.03" | 2480x2200 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Honor Magic V2 RSR SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 234 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.92" | 2344x2156 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 259 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.03" | 2160x1916 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 253 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.60" | 2176x1812 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.
保护套 -Galaxy Z Fold6,具有 IP 保护等级
Galaxy Z Fold6 不仅比 Z Fold5 更薄、更轻,而且比 Z Fold6 更轻。 折叠5还更加棱角分明和对称。在折叠状态下,手机外壳纤薄了 1.3 毫米,轻了 14 克。毋庸置疑,我们认可三星对 XXL 可折叠手机的进一步开发,但Galaxy 机型的紧凑程度远不及来自中国的竞争对手,如 vivo X Fold3.Fold6 的显示屏折叠也比中国制造商的折叠手机要突出得多。三星称,为了更好地抵御外界影响,折叠边缘经过了不同程度的加固和涂层处理。
与前代产品的 IPx8 认证相比,Fold6 新的 IP48 防护等级名义上具有更强的防护能力。这意味着大于 1 毫米的灰尘颗粒不再对折叠屏构成威胁。现在,该设备的正面和背面都采用了大猩猩胜利女神 2 号玻璃,而外壳仍然是铠甲铝合金材质。
这款手机的制造质量非常出色。其超紧无级挠性铰链也让人感觉优质耐用。
连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 的三星智能手机
Galaxy Z Fold6 有三种不同的存储版本可供选择,它们都提供了全面的功能,包括蓝牙 5.3、USB OTG、NFC、UWB 芯片、Miracast 和 Samsung DeX。三星可折叠手机还采用了快速 USB 标准(3.2 Gen.1),支持将有线图像输出到 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 接口。在我们使用三星 980 Pro(M2.SSD 硬盘)进行的复制测试中,USB 端口的传输速率达到了 224 MB/s。连接的存储介质可格式化为 NTFS(只读)或 exFAT。
软件 - 更新时间长的Galaxy 手机
Galaxy Z Fold6 预装了Android 14 和三星内部操作系统 One UI 6.1。得益于三星和谷歌之间的独家合作关系,谷歌双子座应用被集成到了系统中,并可使用 "圈到搜索 "功能。 Galaxy 从 Galaxy S24 Ultra也可以使用。在测试时,三星可折叠手机的操作系统采用了 2024 年 6 月的安全补丁。
可持续性
三星在其Galaxy Z Fold6 中使用了可回收材料。除了再生塑料、钴、铝和玻璃,它还使用了再生金和铜。其包装也完全由再生纸制成。由于不含充电器,包装体积更小、重量更轻,这意味着运输过程中产生的废气排放量更少。包装盒采用大豆油墨印刷。
软件更新方面的长期支持是三星手机的一大亮点。七代操作系统的升级和七年的安全更新确实是非常可持续的。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy Z Fold6 with WiFi 6E
Galaxy 可折叠手机支持当前所有的移动通信标准和包括 5G Sub6 在内的各种频率。在家庭 Wi-Fi 网络中,Fold6 仍然不支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7,但与 折叠5一样,它支持 ax 标准。使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 作为参考路由器,我们的测试设备显示,在 6 GHz 频段内发送数据时,传输速率相对较低。
Networking | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
与我们的对比设备 Garmin Venu 2 相比,我们测试样本的定位服务证明非常出色。部分归功于其双频全球导航卫星系统,Fold6 只显示出与我们实际路线的微小偏差。
电话功能和通话质量 - 支持 eSIM 的三星智能手机
三星智能手机通过两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽和/或两个 eSIM 配置文件提供全面的双卡支持。它的通话质量非常好,语音再现清晰。还支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话以及实时翻译。
相机 -Galaxy Z Fold6,5000 万像素
Galaxy Z Fold6 的超广角镜头和 1000 万像素长焦摄像头都达到了可折叠手机的良好效果。在纸面上拥有更好摄像头的可折叠手机,如 Honor Magic V2-在日常使用中的照片效果明显较差。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide angleWide angleLow lightUltra-wide angleZoom 5x配件和保修 - 不带电源的可折叠手机
手机的供货范围不包括电源适配器或保护套,但包括数据线或充电线(USB-C 至 USB-C)和 SIM 卡工具。三星为 Fold6 提供了大量可供选择的配套保护套。S Pen 也必须单独购买。
只要是在美国购买的三星手机,都享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。此外,购买 Fold6 还可享受一年免费 Care+。
输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的三星智能手机
三星智能手机外部的 6.3 英寸 OLED 面板和内部的 7.6 英寸主显示屏刷新率高达 120 Hz,因此可以快速响应并流畅显示内容。由于采用了迄今为止可折叠手机中最好的铰链设计,手机在部分展开状态下几乎可以在任何角度实现柔性模式。此外,支持手写笔也是Galaxy Z Fold 系列的一大特色。遗憾的是,三星未能为 Fold6 现在更宽的外部显示屏提供 S-Pen 兼容性,而这在日常使用中肯定会非常有用。
电源键上集成了指纹传感器,它能非常可靠地解锁三星手机。用户还可以通过前置摄像头和显示屏下方的摄像头使用安全性较低的 2D 面部识别系统。在这个价格范围内,它的线性振动电机(X 轴)清晰而精确。
显示屏 -Galaxy 配备可折叠屏幕的手机
在我们的测试中,Galaxy Z Fold6 的主显示屏达到了 2,778 cd/m² 的峰值亮度(HDR 内容)。但是,即使在显示明暗均匀分布的区域(APL18)时,Fold6 也能达到同样高的亮度(2,724 cd/m²)。
两款显示器均采用 LTPO 面板,刷新率可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间调节。由于屏幕使用的是 OLED 技术,它们都使用脉宽调制来控制亮度。我们使用 Rigol 软件(自动)测得的屏幕闪烁频率为 120 Hz,这可能是由于 BFI(黑框插入)造成的。我们手动测量的结果是频率为 480 Hz。用示波器测量到的 PWM 是均匀的,振幅也相当平缓,略高于 16%。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 1396 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Foldable display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2, 2160x1856, 7.6" | Vivo X Fold3 AMOLED, 2480x2200, 8" | Honor Magic V2 RSR OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9" | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 21% | 10% | 12% | -47% | |
Brightness middle | 1396 | 1793 28% | 961 -31% | 1307 -6% | 1104 -21% |
Brightness | 1387 | 1806 30% | 950 -32% | 1308 -6% | 1107 -20% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 99 11% | 97 9% | 96 8% | 97 9% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 0.9 47% | 0.8 53% | 1 41% | 3.1 -82% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 2.1 16% | 1.5 40% | 1.7 32% | 4.2 -68% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.6 -7% | 1.2 20% | 1.5 -0% | 3 -100% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.01 109% |
CCT | 6495 100% | 6595 99% | 6396 102% | 6313 103% | 6594 99% |
* ... smaller is better
6.3 英寸动态盖板显示屏不仅比 Fold5 稍大,而且采用了更宽的 22.1:9 宽高比。其峰值亮度与内屏相当(APL18:2,623 cd/m²,HDR:2,649 cd/m²)。
Outer display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 AMOLED, 2376x968, 6.3" | Vivo X Fold3 2748x1172, 6.5" | Honor Magic V2 RSR OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4" | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Dynamic AMOLED, 2316x904, 6.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | |||||
Brightness middle | 1363 | 1580 | 1093 | 1020 | 957 |
Brightness | 1369 | 1585 | 1087 | 1065 | 958 |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 94 | 96 | 84 | 97 |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 2.3 |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 2 | 4 |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 2 |
Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.38 92% | 2.21 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.02 109% |
CCT | 6633 98% | 6700 97% | 6412 101% | 6436 101% | 6465 101% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 16.45 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(封面显示;最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。
我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和光分光计检查了屏幕的色彩校准。两块屏幕的色彩偏差大致在目标范围内(<3),不过我们测量的主屏幕的 DeltaE 值总体较低。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.986 ms rise | |
↘ 0.884 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3.15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.46 ms rise | |
↘ 1.69 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
在户外,Fold6 的两块显示屏都给人留下了非常深刻的印象--即使是在炎炎夏日。面板的视角稳定性也非常好。
性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的Galaxy Z Fold6
骁龙 8 Snapdragon 8 Gen.GalaxyFold6 配备了 12GB DDR5x 内存和 512GB UFS 4.0 存储空间,在我们的基准测试中表现出色。与 Galaxy S24 Ultra相比,分数略低。Fold6 的 UFS 4.0 存储器在写入小数据块时明显较弱。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (15793 - 18852, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
钛 Adreno 750在我们的图形测试中,Adreno 750 的表现非常出色,但遗憾的是,它在完成任务时却拉了手刹。Fold6 在 GFXBench 和 3DMark 测试中的得分有时与三星 Galaxy S24 Ultra在 GFXBench 和 3DMark 测试中,Fold6 的成绩有时与三星 S24 Ultra 不相上下,但在大多数情况下,它的成绩要低得多--尽管可折叠手机只需计算其主显示屏上略低的像素数。后续机型的图形性能也仅部分优于 折叠5.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Vivo X Fold3 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Vivo X Fold3 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Vivo X Fold3 |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Vivo X Fold3 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Vivo X Fold3 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Vivo X Fold3 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Vivo X Fold3 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Vivo X Fold3 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Vivo X Fold3 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (155.8 - 210, n=3) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127) | |
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (237 - 281, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111) | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (181 - 211, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111) | |
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (192 - 218, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrome 127) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (66754 - 72835, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115) | |
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124) | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR (Chrome 121) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Vivo X Fold3 (Chrome 124) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115) | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (555 - 599, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | Vivo X Fold3 | Honor Magic V2 RSR | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 249% | 298% | 258% | 74% | 238% | 117% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 4115.34 | 3556.73 -14% | 3359.31 -18% | 3572.73 -13% | 4384.43 7% | 3625 ? -12% | 1894 ? -54% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 2083.25 | 3076.11 48% | 3399.45 63% | 2897.27 39% | 2449.23 18% | 3001 ? 44% | 1476 ? -29% |
Random Read 4KB | 398.01 | 387.96 -3% | 416.98 5% | 389.81 -2% | 459.94 16% | 386 ? -3% | 278 ? -30% |
Random Write 4KB | 45.73 | 486.21 963% | 568.29 1143% | 506.41 1007% | 161.39 253% | 467 ? 921% | 312 ? 582% |
游戏 -Galaxy Z Fold6 可达到 120 帧/秒
我们使用GameBench 应用程序来了解游戏在测试设备上运行的流畅度,以及 HFR 游戏的可能性。在记录过程中,Fold6 达到了最高 120fps。我们测试的Android 游戏全部运行流畅,没有任何明显的异常。
排放物 - 三星手机温度超高
温度
在我们的测量过程中,手机表面温度变化很大,Fold6 的最高温度甚至超过了 50 摄氏度。
根据三星的说法,它的蒸气腔冷却系统比上一代产品扩大了 前代产品但这只是略微改善了手机在日常使用中的节流问题。我们测得的热引起的性能下降约为 25% 至 40%。我们测量了 Snapdragon 8 Gen.Galaxy使用 3DMark 压力测试。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 |
发言人
Fold6 依靠两个扬声器为智能手机提供出色的立体声音效。虽然可折叠手机的音效没有很大的深度,但其低音却比较清晰。粉红噪声 "还显示出中高音的线性频率响应,只有超级高音扬声器会出现破音。
如果要对外输出声音,可以使用设备的有线 USB 连接或无线蓝牙 5.3。不过,后者使用的编解码器范围有限(SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC、SCC、LDAC、AAC)。
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 -Galaxy Z Fold6 充电功率仅为 25 瓦特
耗电量
Fold6 配有大尺寸主屏幕,耗电量相当不错。 Fold5在闲置模式下更省电一些。使用该公司自己的有线 "超级快速充电 "技术,它的电池充电功率仍然只有 25 瓦,无线充电功率只有 15 瓦。充电时间约为 90 分钟。
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.11 Watt |
Idle | 0.83 / 1.3 / 1.44 Watt |
Load |
13.57 / 16.03 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 4400 mAh | Vivo X Fold3 5500 mAh | Honor Magic V2 RSR 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 4800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 4400 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 6% | -19% | 3% | 32% | 11% | 12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.83 | 0.91 -10% | 1.31 -58% | 0.86 -4% | 0.55 34% | 0.69 ? 17% | 0.883 ? -6% |
Idle Average * | 1.3 | 1.61 -24% | 1.99 -53% | 1.05 19% | 0.9 31% | 1.233 ? 5% | 1.467 ? -13% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.44 | 1.7 -18% | 2.15 -49% | 1.07 26% | 1 31% | 1.33 ? 8% | 1.621 ? -13% |
Load Average * | 13.57 | 6.36 53% | 8.92 34% | 15.27 -13% | 9.58 29% | 12.1 ? 11% | 6.58 ? 52% |
Load Maximum * | 16.03 | 11.26 30% | 11.05 31% | 17.78 -11% | 10.74 33% | 13.5 ? 16% | 9.91 ? 38% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
遗憾的是,三星手机的电池容量与其前代产品相比并没有增长 前代电池容量仍然只有 4,400 毫安时。在我们进行的 WLAN 电池实际测试中,我们将显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m²,在使用 7.6 英寸 OLED 显示屏的情况下,我们仍然测得了 913 分钟的良好运行时间。
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | |
Vivo X Fold3 | |
Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
Pros
Cons
三星Galaxy Z Fold6 的评价
作为可折叠智能手机领域的先驱,它的 Fold 系列似乎在中国竞争对手面前失去了一些优势,因为它的改进非常有限。第六代 Fold 更轻、更薄,但其他可折叠手机,如 vivo X Fold3等其他可折叠手机在这方面则完全不同。更好的 更好的版本在撰写本文时,Fold 6 的更好版本已经在起步阶段。
Galaxy Z Fold6 在日常使用中成功地掩盖了自己的缺点。
得益于较长的更新时间和强大的功能,Galaxy Z Fold6 仍然是可折叠智能手机中一个有趣的选择--尤其是因为它集成了谷歌的独家服务和可选的 S Pen。然而,对于这样一款高价产品,我们并不十分清楚为何不将其纳入手机的供货范围。
真正能替代 Fold6 的产品少之又少。不过 Honor Magic V2及其 继任者是两款功能强大的 XXL 替代产品。
价格和供应情况
Galaxy Z Fold6 的 512GB 版本目前在亚马逊上的售价为1,646.97 美元。
请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
- 08/16/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.