Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF笔记本电脑评测:带有真彩色显示屏的紧凑型工作室笔记本
技嘉不仅用高性能的硬件来满足游戏玩家的需求,因为这家台湾制造商还设计了用于创意领域的Aero品牌。这里有主板和显卡,也有没有RGB或过于激进的设计、具有大量性能的笔记本。技嘉Aero 14是该笔记本系列中最小的代表。但尺寸并不总是唯一重要的东西。小型Aero 14 OLED BMF包含一个英特尔酷睿i7-13700H和一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050还有16GB的内存和1TB存储空间的NVMe SSD。三星的高分辨率OLED面板被用作显示屏。一块63Wh的电池确保了远离插座的良好运行时间。所有这些都被安置在一个纤细的铝制机箱内。
因此,这款笔记本是创意人士的一个小型、便携和强大的伙伴。但Aero 14在14英寸机型中并不孤单:竞争很激烈,而且经常提供自己的有趣功能。这款申克尔Vision 14有一个巨大的99Wh电池。而 华硕Zephyrus G14配备了AMD处理器和一个 RTX 3060.而 RTX 4090的变体 Zephyrus G14也可能是有趣的。这款 Acer Swift X 14也为对价格敏感的用户提供了合理的性能。对 MSI Stealth 14 Studio和 联想Yoga Pro 7目前正在进行中。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
83.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 19.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 坚固的铝制
笔记本的所有主要表面都是由铝制成的。这使整个设备看起来很结实,质量很高,但又不会太重。笔记本的设计乍一看很简单,但有许多小的设计元素,使笔记本变得松散而不显突兀。例如,技嘉在显示屏铰链上放了小标识,或者在触摸板上隐藏了AΣRO字样。只有显示器盖子上的发光字母才真正吸引人的眼球。
狭窄的显示屏边缘使得显示屏几乎没有边界。一个小的批评点是屏幕的铰链:尽管这些铰链运行平稳,并且总是将屏幕固定在位置上,但屏幕的最大打开角度只有126°。这意味着,当你在腿上使用这台小型笔记本电脑时,你的屏幕视角有时会相当陡峭。
Gigabyte Aero 14只有1.4公斤,比大多数的竞争对手都要轻;只有 申克尔视界的重量要轻100克。在厚度方面,所有的笔记本电脑都远远低于两厘米大关,只有几毫米的差别。在这里,Schenker Vision也是比较领域中最薄的设备,紧随其后的是我们的测试设备。
设备--不含PowerDelivery的Thunderbolt 4
Gigabyte在小笔记本的三个侧面分布了大量的端口选择。左边和右边的USB Type-C以及背面的USB Type-A和HDMI应该可以实现良好的线缆管理。然而,仔细观察发现,左边的USB-C端口被标记为DCIN,它既不支持Thunderbolt也不支持DisplayPort,除了USB功能外,只能用于供电。在我们的测试中,试用了来自不同制造商和性能等级的USB-C PD电源和电缆。不幸的是,该笔记本只接受通过提供的电源适配器供电。在电源适配器和笔记本之间也不能插上扩展坞。右边的USB-C插座支持Thunderbolt 4和DisplayPort,但没有USB Power Delivery。因此,带有扩展坞和外部显示器的桌子的单插头解决方案在这里是不可能的。
SD卡读卡器
Gigabyte Aero 14中的microSD读卡器并没有完全发挥我们的128GBAV PRO microSD的可能传输速度,但所达到的读写速度却特别好。该读卡器能够传输超过180MB/s。
在竞争设备中,只有Schenker Vision有一个SD卡读卡器。然而,它比我们测试设备中的那个慢得多。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
沟通
Gigabyte安装了英特尔AX210模块。这支持最新标准的WiFi 6E和蓝牙5.2。传输速度高于平均水平,并高于竞争设备的速度。然而,5GHz和6GHz网络之间没有明显区别。在我们的AX11000路由器的WiFi 6和WiFi 6E网络中,上传和下载的传输速度几乎没有差异。
网络摄像头
该工作室笔记本的网络摄像头支持通过Windows Hello进行面部识别,分辨率为210万像素(全高清)。在良好的照明条件下,图像质量是相当有说服力的。然而,仔细观察我们的测试图片,会发现边缘模糊,整体略显模糊。如果照明条件不理想,相机很快就会出现噪音。
安全问题
Gigabyte Aero 14只提供面部识别的用户认证。该设备不提供指纹传感器或其他安全功能,如Kensington锁插槽。只有带有TPM 2.0的英特尔酷睿i7的安全功能是活跃的。
辅料
在技嘉的笔记本电脑的包装中,我们只找到了通常的文件和必须的电源适配器。
维护
八个小TORX螺丝将笔记本电脑的底座固定在一起。一旦这些螺丝被拧开,一些塑料夹子就把底座固定住了。可以用一个塑料开口工具或强壮的吸盘从背面和两侧到正面进行操作。在前面,底座的盖子被勾在下面。一旦在两侧和后面松开,你可以稍微抬起它,并向后面移开。
在里面,我们发现一个可交换的M.2 NVMe SSD和M.2 WLAN模块。16GB的工作内存是焊接的。笔记本电脑的锂聚合物电池用另外两个螺丝固定。虽然笔记本电脑的风扇仍然可以很容易地清洗,但你只能通过拆下整个冷却系统来访问这里的冷却鳍。
担保
不幸的是,技嘉的保修声明没有回答笔记本的保修期有多长的问题,而是提到了零售商。在德国,这可能是法定的24个月。当然,这在其他国家可能有所不同,所以感兴趣的买家应该在购买前仔细检查。
制造商规定,电池的全球保修期为一年。
Input Devices - Remarkable 1.7 mm key travel
键盘
Gigabyte Aero 14 BMF有一个出色的背光键盘,键程为1.7毫米。这不是一个理所当然的问题,特别是在这样一个超薄的笔记本电脑。与强大的触觉反馈相结合,这使得工作动态良好。只有键盘上的字可以有更多的对比度。
键盘背光灯的另一个缺点是它的亮度控制。如果没有设置为全亮度,就会听到轻微的线圈啸叫。
触摸板
Gigabyte Aero 14的触摸板大得令人愉快,为12.1 × 7.8厘米。它位于机箱的中央,因此为手的脚跟留下了足够的空间。由于触摸板是由磨砂玻璃制成的,它应该可以长时间保持其令人愉快的表面纹理。根据不同的观察角度,AΣRO品牌的字样或多或少会被注意到。
显示屏 - 真彩色OLED
Gigabyte Aero 14中安装了一块来自三星的OLED面板。这款面板有许多证书:它通过了Pantone验证,X-Rite认证,TÜV Rheinland认证,并符合Eyesafe 2.0标准。像素密度为243 ppi,分辨率为3K。我们测量了屏幕的最大亮度为430cd/m²。根据技嘉的说法,它支持VESA DisplayHDR 600 True Black,因此应该达到高达600 cd/m²的现货亮度。Windows不允许在电池模式下进行HDR操作,但在主电源操作中,显示器设置中的HDR按钮也保持灰色。Windows也没有发现屏幕的HDR证书。
作为一个OLED显示屏,该面板以真正的黑色来说服人,因此不允许出现任何照明错误。技嘉预装了X-Rite色彩助手,因此承诺DeltaE低于1.15的极低色彩偏差。在这里,你可以选择不同的颜色配置文件:AdobeRGB、Display P3、sRGB和Rec.709。在应用程序中,有关于所有配置文件的报告,描述了色彩再现的情况。没有一个配置文件的平均色彩偏差大于DeltaE 1。这里的症结在于校准的亮度:技嘉Aero 14的显示屏被认证为161.348 cd/m²(62%的屏幕亮度)。如果设置更高的亮度,颜色偏差就会大大增加。色彩配置文件在HDR模式下是不可用的。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 424 cd/m²
Contrast: 4230:1 (Black: 0.1 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.55 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.15
ΔE Greyscale 0.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Samsung SDC4192 (ATNA40YK14-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V B140QAN06.T, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 LEN145-3K, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM LM140LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Samsung ATNA40YK07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 NV140DRM-N62, IPS-LED, 2240x1400, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -15% | -3% | -1% | -21% | 4% | -16% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 74.1 -26% | 96.2 -4% | 98.7 -1% | 68.1 -32% | 99.9 0% | 70.21 -30% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 97.4 -3% | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 92.4 -8% | 100 0% | 99.04 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 88.7 | 75.3 -15% | 85.3 -4% | 87.6 -1% | 67.7 -24% | 99 12% | 72.59 -18% |
Response Times | -859% | -136% | -886% | -1192% | 36% | -1338% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.4 ? | 31.5 ? -1213% | 5.5 ? -129% | 31.5 ? -1213% | 34.4 ? -1333% | 1.36 ? 43% | 42 ? -1650% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.4 ? | 14.5 ? -504% | 5.8 ? -142% | 15.8 ? -558% | 27.6 ? -1050% | 1.36 ? 43% | 27 ? -1025% |
PWM Frequency | 300 | 367.6 ? 23% | |||||
Screen | -192% | -167% | -33% | -252% | -249% | -159% | |
Brightness middle | 423 | 421 0% | 419 -1% | 441 4% | 329.4 -22% | 414.3 -2% | 344 -19% |
Brightness | 427 | 416 -3% | 402 -6% | 453 6% | 311 -27% | 416 -3% | 330 -23% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 89 -9% | 89 -9% | 92 -6% | 90 -8% | 99 1% | 81 -17% |
Black Level * | 0.1 | 0.28 -180% | 0.43 -330% | 0.34 -240% | 0.39 -290% | 0.21 -110% | |
Contrast | 4230 | 1504 -64% | 974 -77% | 1297 -69% | 845 -80% | 1638 -61% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.55 | 3.2 -482% | 2.3 -318% | 0.6 -9% | 4.01 -629% | 4.68 -751% | 2.39 -335% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.15 | 5.5 -378% | 5.8 -404% | 1.3 -13% | 8.21 -614% | 7.78 -577% | 5.24 -356% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.15 | 2 -74% | 0.9 22% | 0.6 48% | 3.89 -238% | 0.99 14% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.69 | 4.4 -538% | 3.3 -378% | 0.8 -16% | 3.2 -364% | 1.8 -161% | 4.31 -525% |
Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.22 99% | 2.14 103% | 2.2 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.46 89% |
CCT | 6479 100% | 6384 102% | 6550 99% | 6597 99% | 7070 92% | 6207 105% | 6573 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -355% /
-249% | -102% /
-127% | -307% /
-148% | -488% /
-337% | -70% /
-114% | -504% /
-297% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器P3和sRGB的渲染率几乎为100%。对于完整的AdobeRGB再现,显示器在绿色和蓝色的光谱方面有所欠缺。根据我们的测量,屏幕在全亮度下只能达到88%的AdobeRGB。
在这里,通过X-Rite应用程序设置和测量DisplayP3配置文件。在全亮度下,技嘉无法履行其对Aero 14 OLED的广告承诺。DeltaE 1.15显然没有达到。该显示器只有在62%的亮度和低于62%的亮度时才能实现广告中的色彩保真度。我们的ICC配置文件是在100%的亮度下创建的(可在上面的信息框中下载),在这里只带来轻微的改善。该显示器从DeltaE的平均色彩偏差5.17提高到4.25。即使在全亮度下,DeltaE 3及以下的色彩偏差也是可取的。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 300 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 300 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 300 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在430cd/m²的情况下,该显示器实际上应该很适合户外使用。然而,只要你想要精确的色彩再现,这在预设的色彩配置文件中就会发生变化。162 cd/m²很难胜过光线充足的室内和它们在光面显示器上的反射。即使在完整的430cd/m²的情况下,反射也会严重损害在阳光下的可读性。
与OLED显示器的惯例一样,改变视角时几乎没有任何颜色和对比度的偏差。从所有位置看,Aero 14 OLED都能提供一个良好的画面。
性能 - 英特尔酷睿i7-13700H,与前代产品相比没有改进
Aero 14 OLED有两种配置,都配备了GeForce RTX 4050和16GB LPDDR5。我们的测试设备(BMF)使用 英特尔酷睿i7-13700H,而另一个配置变体(9MF)使用的是 i5-12500H。在所有其他功能方面,Aero 14 OLED BMF和9MF几乎完全相同。
这意味着两者都能很好地满足工作室笔记本电脑的要求。你可以进行3D渲染、视频和照片编辑。许多游戏也应该在设备上顺利运行。然而,目前的标题往往对图形内存有更高的要求。因此,GeForce 4050中的6GB是相当紧张的。
技嘉控制中心 - 已失去控制
在我们的测试中,技嘉控制中心造成了相当多的问题、蓝屏和大量的挫折感。该应用程序实际上可以用来调整笔记本电脑上的大量设置,只需点击几下。在启动该应用程序时,第一个批评点突然出现:Windows用户账户控制启动了。出现了熟悉的问题:"你想允许这个应用程序对你的设备进行更改吗?"
。
之后,你就会进入该应用程序的无意义的开始屏幕。在这里,你必须进一步点击才能进入扩展设置。
在 "常规 "选项卡中的许多设置选项是做什么的,在任何地方都没有充分解释。这里还可以访问Aero 14的四个不同的性能配置文件。然而,我们在测试中注意到,笔记本电脑有时会以不稳定的方式在性能配置文件之间来回切换。
该应用程序的最大问题是在应用程序打开时随机出现蓝屏。最初,我们不知道原因是什么,但经过一段时间后,我们确定这与技嘉控制应用程序有关。只有在这个程序没有被最小化时,笔记本电脑才会在各种情况下崩溃。
在其中一次崩溃后,该应用程序拒绝承认它是在一台技嘉笔记本电脑上运行。它几乎失去了所有功能。这意味着笔记本电脑的风扇一直在全速运转。简单的更新或重设应用程序并没有带来任何改善。只有在我们卸载了技嘉控制中心的所有组件,用CCleaner清理了注册表,并重新安装了技嘉最新版本的控制中心。在为我们的测试设备下载了几个更新后,该软件又想工作了。然后它的运行比以前稳定多了。
测试条件
技嘉控制中心有四个性能配置文件。我们在AI Boost模式下运行所有的基准测试,激活 "正常 "风扇曲线。然后,处理器的供电功率为40瓦,NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050的供电功率为35瓦。所有记录的日志显示,没有任何功率在GPU和CPU之间来回转移。在所有性能模式下,我们看到GPU的最大功率为35瓦。在人工智能和创造者模式下,英特尔酷睿i7的性能上限为PL2的70瓦和PL1的40瓦。在会议模式和Energysaver-Silent模式下,PL1被限制在15瓦,PL2为30瓦。
处理器
Gigabyte安装了英特尔目前猛禽湖系列的高端酷睿i7 CPU。这款i7-13700H对于这样一个小型笔记本来说是非常强大的,通常安装在游戏笔记本上。该处理器有六个性能核心和八个效率核心,有20个线程。再一次,在猛禽湖处理器中,与前代产品几乎没有明显的区别。这里的 i7-12700H在 申科视界14是一个很好的比较。在那里,第12代处理器也消耗40瓦的功率。这两款处理器在通用处理器的基准测试中只有微小的差别。
如果你想节省一些钱,你应该看一下以下的基准测试Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3和 Honor 魔法书14;这两款笔记本电脑中的i5-12500H CPU也可用于更便宜的Aero 14 OLED 9MF。虽然性能差异在基准测试中是可见的,但它在10%至15%的范围内,因此对于大多数应用来说是可以忽略不计的。特别是由于Aero有一个专用的GPU,i5的缺点显然得到了缓解。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM -2! | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=28) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 278, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=28) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=28) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12872 - 52727, n=28) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM |
系统性能
这款小型笔记本在PCMark 10和Crossmark基准测试中表现良好。只有在数字内容创作部分,该工作室的笔记本显示出任何弱点,略低于平均水平,为9627分。然而,这里的任何批评都是发散性的,所以这款14英寸的笔记本应该没有问题地符合其预期目的。Aero 14 OLED能快速处理3D和视频渲染以及图像编辑和其他任务。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (6822 - 7556, n=7) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10283 - 11549, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8368 - 9836, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9527 - 10643, n=7) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1205 - 1937, n=9) | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1158 - 1877, n=9) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1293 - 2044, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1097 - 1929, n=9) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
PCMark 10 Score | 7273 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (24334 - 78081, n=28) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (23681 - 79656, n=28) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (22986 - 99898, n=28) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
对于运行播客或直播流的内容创作者来说,测得的相对较高的DPC延迟可能会成为一个很大的批评点。在测试时,以其目前的驱动配置,Aero 14 OLED几乎不适合进行实时音频或视频编辑。另一方面,我们的4K 60Hz YouTube测试视频运行时没有任何掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Gigabyte在Aero 14 OLED中安装了自己的NVMe SSD。这款Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10显示出良好的传输率,并没有避开备受赞誉的三星980 Pro固态硬盘。这些产品在顺序阅读方面更快,但在日常使用中更常见的随机任务中,技嘉固态硬盘有明显的优势。最重要的是,正如DiskSpd Loop显示的那样,Aero 14 OLED中的SSD能够在较长时间内保持高性能。除其他外,机箱底部的散热垫对此做出了贡献,使硬盘保持在低工作温度。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050在我们的测试设备中是由35瓦供电的。理论上,来自Nvidia最新一代Ada Lovelace的显卡可以提供高达115瓦的功率。因此,Aero 14在3DMark、Blender和其他基准测试中并没有真正产生任何高分。但是入门级显卡仍然足以在渲染视频或3D场景中实现最佳工作。幸运的是,GPU的性能在长时间内保持相当稳定。
与酷睿i7相比,当考虑到TGP阶段时,Nvidia图形显示出与前代产品相比有明显的性能提高。该RTX 3050在Schenker Vision 14和Acer Swift X中也提供了35瓦的功率。这两款笔记本在图形芯片的所有基准测试中都至少落后20%。
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 211524 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 45695 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15329 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6151 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
对于大量的全高清分辨率的游戏来说, RTX 4050完全可以达到良好的帧数,即使在高质量设置下也是如此。只有老游戏在屏幕的全3K分辨率下才真正可以玩。然而,诸如F1 2022或霍格沃茨遗产中的光线追踪会导致帧率大幅下降,在全高清下也是如此。4050的6GB VRAM可能被证明是较新作品的一个瓶颈。最近,PC版的 最后的我们》(The Last of Us引起了我们的不满,因为它对显存的要求很高。最终,这款小型笔记本电脑不仅仅可以用于偶尔的游戏。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
在Witcher 3 长期测试中,我们看到相当稳定的帧率。在游戏中的日/夜过程中,典型的起伏在这里几乎看不出来。在测试进行了大约三分之二之后,性能的较小下降约为3帧,是明显的。
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 183.4 | 180.9 | 161.6 | 74.3 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 87 | 67.7 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 147.6 | 139.4 | 135.1 | 129.1 | 69.7 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 142.6 | 77.5 | 58.5 | 41 | 22.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 146.6 | 122.9 | 98.2 | 83.2 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 396 | 150.5 | 117 | 100.2 | ||
F1 22 (2022) | 157.9 | 149 | 100.8 | 33.3 | ||
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 49.4 | 44.8 | 39 | |||
The Last of Us (2023) | 53.4 | 44.6 | 0 |
排放--吹口哨的风扇
噪声
即使笔记本电脑中的风扇很少达到在15厘米距离上测量的51分贝(A),它们在许多情况下仍然产生令人不快的高噪音。只要它们转得快一点,几乎都能听到2000赫兹左右的呼啸声。而且不幸的是,这种情况经常发生。即使在笔记本电脑闲置时,风扇也会定期旋转起来。
当键盘在一个较低的亮度水平上点亮较长时间时,也会有略微明显的线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 35.71 dB(A) |
Load |
| / 51.93 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | -14% | -8% | 0% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 24.4 -2% | 24.8 -3% | 23.8 1% | 25 -4% | 24 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 24.4 -2% | 25.4 -6% | 23.8 1% | 26.6 -11% | 24 -0% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 24.4 -2% | 34.5 -44% | 23.8 1% | 26.6 -11% | 24 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 35.71 | 27.8 22% | 34.5 3% | 30.6 14% | 27.5 23% | 24 33% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.22 | 48.2 -20% | 52.7 -31% | 60.1 -49% | 45.75 -14% | |
Load Maximum * | 51.93 | 48.8 6% | 52.3 -1% | 60 -16% | 49.7 4% | 54.55 -5% |
Load Average * | 43.3 | 35.4 | 44.2 | 49.7 | 37.71 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于CPU和dGPU一起产生高达75瓦的废热,小小的技嘉Aero 14 OLED随着时间的推移而明显发热也就不足为奇。经过一个小时的压力测试,只有触摸板保持在30℃以下。笔记本的底部发热到52℃。由于基本单元完全由铝制成,这个温度感觉很不舒服。另一方面,笔记本在低负荷或闲置时几乎总是保持在室温。
,然而,与竞争对手的比较表明:Gigabyte Aero 14保持相对凉爽。华硕Zephyrus G14是这里的佼佼者,最高温度达62℃。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -10% | -3% | -23% | -1% | -23% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 48.4 -15% | 41.6 1% | 55.4 -32% | 43 -2% | 49.8 -19% |
Maximum Bottom * | 52 | 57.1 -10% | 55.7 -7% | 62.2 -20% | 46.4 11% | 51 2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 28.1 -8% | 25.9 -0% | 31 -19% | 28.2 -8% | 39.6 -52% |
Idle Bottom * | 27 | 29 -7% | 28 -4% | 32.4 -20% | 28.4 -5% | 32.7 -21% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在整个压力测试中,技嘉Aero 14 OLED能够在一定程度上保持其性能。在短暂的提升阶段之后,处理器的有效时钟在2400和2100赫兹之间波动。真正的性能损失几乎与此无关。酷睿i7在这里需要大约15分钟才能达到89℃左右。然后这个温度几乎持续保持。
发言人
小小的笔记本电脑里没有安置大的音响系统。在86dB(A)的音量下,扬声器变得相当响亮,但它们显然缺乏动力,特别是在低频方面。不幸的是,中音和高音也完全不平衡。总是有某些频率被特别强调,而其他频率则明显表现不足。在中频和高频范围内,可以确定与中位数有10分贝以上的偏差。
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--经济型
消耗功率
Gigabyte笔记本的功耗很好。Aero 14在几乎所有测量中都比对比设备更有效。Gigabyte包括一个130瓦的电源。在我们的测试中,这台小笔记本只在很短的时间内需要这个功率,否则在压力测试中长时间保持在120瓦左右的功率。在这次测量的结果中,我们清楚地看到功耗突然下降。这可能是由于最初观察到的性能模式之间的切换造成的。
Off / Standby | 0.9 / 4.1 Watt |
Idle | 7.4 / 8.3 / 8.7 Watt |
Load |
76 / 132 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS-LED, 2240x1400, 14" | MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -14% | -30% | -59% | -2% | -34% | -57% | -12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.4 | 7.5 -1% | 5.6 24% | 7.6 -3% | 7.3 1% | 8.5 -15% | 9.84 ? -33% | 6.54 ? 12% |
Idle Average * | 8.3 | 10.4 -25% | 10.4 -25% | 12.3 -48% | 8.3 -0% | 10.2 -23% | 14.8 ? -78% | 11.3 ? -36% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 11.4 -31% | 18 -107% | 17.6 -102% | 13.1 -51% | 11.3 -30% | 19.1 ? -120% | 13.3 ? -53% |
Load Average * | 76 | 83.3 -10% | 68 11% | 111 -46% | 70 8% | 84 -11% | 87.9 ? -16% | 70.7 ? 7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 70 | 92.7 -32% | 113 -61% | 117.1 -67% | 70.2 -0% | 128 -83% | ||
Load Maximum * | 132 | 110.3 16% | 158.2 -20% | 245.8 -86% | 95 28% | 189 -43% | 179.6 ? -36% | 116.1 ? 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
在最好的情况下,技嘉Aero 14 OLED的63Wh电池在Wi-Fi网上冲浪测试中持续了7.5小时以上,但只是在完全重新安装了技嘉控制中心之后。在此之前,在屏幕亮度为150cd/m²的情况下,这里只可能有三个小时的运行时间。尽管Aero 14几乎拥有对比领域中最小的电池,但它的运行效率相当高。
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 72 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 58.7 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 34% | -21% | -9% | 43% | -21% | 17% | 39% | |
Reader / Idle | 678 | 1262 86% | 486 -28% | 1168 ? 72% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 457 | 607 33% | 378 -17% | 595 30% | 710 55% | 374 -18% | 643 41% | 640 ? 40% |
Load | 92 | 124 35% | 69 -25% | 49 -47% | 81 -12% | 77 -16% | 86 -7% | 97.1 ? 6% |
H.264 | 666 | 396 | 742 | 739 | 847 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论--概念强烈,缺点太多
在笔记本的硬件方面,技嘉Aero 14 OLED以一个稳定的机箱而令人信服,里面有一个经过精心调校的酷睿 酷睿i7-13700H和一个 GeForce RTX 4050.两者都没有在其最大TDP下运行,但我们的测试表明,CPU和dGPU的功率分别为40瓦和35瓦,足以提供坚实的性能。在某些情况下,Areo 14的OLED显示屏可以提供良好的色彩再现。然而,在校准模式下162cd/m²的亮度限制,则需要在黑暗的环境中实现良好的可读性。另一方面,出色的键盘是一个明显的优点。1.7毫米的键程是非常罕见的,特别是对于小型笔记本电脑。
技嘉的控制软件是一个不同的故事:控制中心简直令人难以接受。它既杂乱无章又容易出错。这显然拖累了我们对该笔记本的整体印象。这同样适用于USB-C和PowerDelivery方面的连接。其他USB-PD电源根本不愿意与本本合作。因此,笔记本的移动因素在这里受到影响。
凭借英特尔酷睿i7-13700H和英伟达GeForce RTX 4050,强大的硬件被内置在14英寸的笔记本电脑中。尽管供应量为75瓦,它仍然提供了体面的性能。相反,Aero 14 OLED的速度被技嘉自己的软件拖慢了。
基本上,技嘉将Aero 14 OLED定位在一个有吸引力的价格-性能谱系中:你以1.699,00美元获得一个强大的设备。然而,去年的所有参考设备现在都以明显更低的价格出售。这款 Acer Predator Triton 300在电池寿命方面的性能不如技嘉Aero,但价格仅为1.179,99美元。该 斯堪的纳维亚的Vision 14也同样昂贵。鉴于英特尔第12代和第13代之间缺乏改进,去年的其他14英寸笔记本也值得一看。
价格和可用性
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF目前在美国亚马逊上以1.699,00美元的价格上市。.
建议其他国家的感兴趣的买家直接通过技嘉的官方产品页面。.点击 "购买 "并从出现的下拉列表中选择您的国家,之后您将被转到您所选国家的适用在线商店和零售商的列表。
价格截止到2023年5月5日,可能会有变化。
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF
- 05/02/2023 v7 (old)
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.