Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ROG Zephyrus G14评测--配备AMD Zen4 Phoenix和RTX 4090的紧凑型游戏笔记本电脑

Ryzen 9 7940HS的首次亮相。

2023年的华硕ROG Zephyrus G14是首款采用AMD新凤凰移动处理器的笔记本电脑,它与快速的GeForce RTX 4090笔记本电脑和165赫兹迷你LED面板结合在一起,是一款紧凑的14英寸笔记本电脑。
Laptop / Notebook Geforce Windows Zen 4 Ryzen (Zen)

华硕ROG Zephyrus G14是一款非常强大的14英寸笔记本电脑,适合游戏玩家以及内容创作者。去年,我们测试了它与AMDRyzen 9 6900HSRadeon RX 6800S,今年,新的G14是第一款配备新的AMD Zen4 Phoenix处理器的设备,即Ryzen 9 7940HS.这一次,新的Ryzen 9与Nvidia最新的笔记本电脑GPU相结合。

我们的审查单位与ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY是高端模型与前面提到的AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 32 GB内存, 一个1 TB PCIe-4.0 SSD, NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑,以及具有QHD+分辨率和165赫兹刷新率的哑光迷你LED面板。这个包显然不便宜,建议零售价为3999欧元。我们在性能部分概述了其他(不那么昂贵)的型号。我们显然想知道新的AMD处理器的性能如何,以及紧凑的14英寸机箱如何处理RTX 4090笔记本电脑。

我们还将很快发表关于新的AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS以及集成GPU Radeon 780M的全面分析文章。

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY (ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1455 MHz, RAM: 2250 MHz, 125 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 531.68, Advanced Optimus, MUX-Switch
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, 1 slot + 16 GB onboard, max. 48 GB
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 216 PPI, B140QAN06.S, Mini-LED, glossy: no, HDR, 165 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 865 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD
Networking
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20.5 x 312 x 227
Battery
76 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2 Woofers + 2 Tweeters, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 240W PSU, MyAsus, Armoury Crate, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.691 kg, Power Supply: 727 g
Price
3999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
90 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1.7 kg20.5 mm14.00"2560x1600
89.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.8 mm14.00"2560x1440
86.7 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S
1.7 kg19.5 mm14.00"2560x1600
86.7 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg14.5 mm14.00"1920x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1.7 kg19.8 mm14.00"2880x1800
93.9 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964

外壳 - G14,设计不显眼

与之前的机型相比,华硕并没有改变机箱。上次我们评测了白色版本,包括盖子上的AniME显示屏,现在我们评测的是更微妙的灰色版本。这款游戏笔记本上也没有引人注目的设计元素,只是在盖子上有一个微妙的图案。在专业环境中使用这款笔记本应该不是问题,不会受到太多关注。

基本单元仍然由镁合金制成,尽管表面有轻微的软触感。但这并不是什么批评,该设备给人的感觉是优质产品,甚至指纹也不是什么大问题。当你打开盖子时,基本单元略微升高,这改善了热能以及人体工程学。稳定性真的很好,键盘没有弯曲,我们也无法扭转底座。我们也喜欢铰链的调整,尽管它们不能防止在你调整打开角度(最多180度)时的轻微晃动。然而,这在实践中不应该是一个问题。

盖子是由铝制成的,稍有弹性,但我们也无法激起任何吱吱作响的声音。边框非常纤细,尤其是在两侧,这导致了81%的体面的屏幕与身体的比率。

新的Zephyrus G14的体重接近1.7公斤,在我们的比较组中处于中间位置,尽管有高端组件和金属底盘。这款Alienware x14是迄今为止占地面积最大的设备,但其他设备也非常相似。然而,G14是最厚的设备,厚度为20.5毫米。显然,有更纤细的14英寸笔记本电脑,但它们几乎没有那么强大,G14仍然是一个非常移动的设备。对于大型的240W电源适配器(727克)来说,这并不是真正的情况,但你也可以在旅途中通过USB-C为设备充电。

尺寸比较

319.7 mm 220 mm 16.8 mm 1.8 kg321.5 mm 262.77 mm 14.5 mm 1.8 kg313.4 mm 227 mm 19.8 mm 1.7 kg312 mm 227 mm 20.5 mm 1.7 kg312 mm 227 mm 19.5 mm 1.7 kg312.6 mm 221.2 mm 15.5 mm 1.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 带有USB 4.0的AMD游戏机

端口布局与前代产品相同,这意味着所有的端口仍然位于两边的前面。如果你真的使用所有的连接器,可能会相当拥挤。后面的区域完全是为冷却和风扇排气保留的。

左侧的USB-C端口现在支持4.0标准,包括视频输出和电源传输。这个端口连接到iGPU,所以你可以使用这个输出来使用集成GPU的外部屏幕。如果你使用右侧的USB-C端口或HDMI输出,图形输出将由Nvidia GPU处理,在日常情况下会消耗更多能量。我们通过USB 4.0运行一个雷电底座(CalDigit TS4)和一个10 Gbps以太网适配器没有问题。

左侧:电源,HDMI 2.1(dGPU),USB-C 4.0(40Gbps,DisplayPort-ALT-模式1.4(iGPU),Power Delivery),3.5毫米立体声
左侧:电源,HDMI 2.1(dGPU),USB-C 4.0(40Gbps,DisplayPort-ALT-模式1.4(iGPU),Power Delivery),3.5毫米立体声
右侧:microSD读卡器,USB-C 3.2 Gen.2(10 Gbps,DisplayPort-ALT模式(dGPU)与G-Sync),2个USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10 Gbps)。
右侧:microSD读卡器,USB-C 3.2 Gen.2(10 Gbps,DisplayPort-ALT模式(dGPU)与G-Sync),2个USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10 Gbps)。

SD卡阅读器

小型microSD读卡器(弹簧机构)是最快的模块之一,我们用参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)测得的最大传输速率超过了260 MB/s,当我们从卡上复制图像时,传输速率仍然达到了~130 MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
189 MB/s +42%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro (AV Pro V60)
181 MB/s +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
151 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (Angelibrid AV Pro V60)
133 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
96 MB/s -28%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (Angelibrid AV Pro V60)
263 MB/s
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
222 MB/s -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro (AV Pro V60)
208 MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
178 MB/s -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)
120.4 MB/s -54%

沟通

华硕使用了RealTek的现代Wi-Fi模块(MT9722),它支持最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准以及蓝牙5.2。然而,我们无法将测试模型与我们的参考路由器(华硕)的相应6GHz网络连接起来,但在5GHz网络(Wi-Fi 6)中的传输速率也非常好和稳定。在我们审查期间,我们没有注意到任何连接问题。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  ()
1412 MBit/s
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1410 (1239min - 1603max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Qualcomm WCN685x
1049 (964min - 1093max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  ()
1700 MBit/s
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Qualcomm WCN685x
1537 (1431min - 1625max) MBit/s
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1371 (1221min - 1483max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1658 (1491min, 1491.29P1 - 1801max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1518 (707min - 1744max) MBit/s -8%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (358 - 1785, n=55)
1279 MBit/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1228 MBit/s -26%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1701 (1660min, 1662.9P1 - 1730max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1606 (746min - 1774max) MBit/s -6%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (707 - 1775, n=55)
1397 MBit/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1397 MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
1777 (1685min, 1701.82P1 - 1813max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1482 (1273min - 1624max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=68, last 2 years)
1429 MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (394 - 1800, n=38)
1399 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
1741 (1650min, 1657.83P1 - 1785max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=68, last 2 years)
1488 MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1454 (1377min - 1497max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (684 - 1771, n=39)
1433 MBit/s
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1658 (1491-1801)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1701 (1660-1730)

网络摄像头

华硕升级了摄像头,现在使用的是包括红外摄像头在内的1080p模块,与Windows Hello相结合进行面部识别。与以前的机型相比,网络摄像头更好,整体质量还可以,但我们今年已经看到了更好的模块。我们在视频评测中包含了一个样本视频,所以你可以对质量有一个更好的印象。

ColorChecker
3.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY: 6.35 ∆E min: 0.69 - max: 12.66 ∆E

维护

底部面板再次由11颗小飞利浦螺钉固定,但其中一些螺钉隐藏在小橡胶盖下面。一旦进入内部,你会看到带有两个风扇的大蒸气室以及电池。你可以更换固态硬盘,除了板载的16GB内存外,还有一个SO-DIMM插槽。这意味着你可以用一个32GB的模块使用多达48GB的内存。

内部布局
内部布局
1x SO-DIMM
1x SO-DIMM

输入设备 - 带有Aura-Sync的ROG 14

键盘提供了1.7毫米的行程,并提供了非常牢固和精确的反馈,因此在G14上输入较长的文字是没有问题的。键盘照明可以通过软件定制多种颜色,但只在一个区域。还可以通过Aura Sync将照明与其他设备同步。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

玻璃触摸板(12.8 x 7.6厘米)提供了良好的滑行能力,标准的光标移动以及最多四个手指的手势都没有问题。触摸板的下半部分可以被推倒,这导致了坚定的反馈和点击声,尽管它可以更安静一点。

显示屏 - 迷你LED,165赫兹

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

华硕为Zen4机型配备了14英寸IPS或Mini-LED面板,分辨率为QHD+(2560 x 1600像素,16:10)。规格表还列出了一个1080p的IPS面板,但我们还找不到相应的SKU。所有配备RTX 4070笔记本电脑或更好的型号都配备了165赫兹的Mini-LED面板。画面的主观印象非常好,内容锐利,没有颗粒感,色彩丰富,由于刷新率高,动作非常流畅。

制造商宣传的亮度为500尼特(HDR的峰值为600尼特),但我们的测量显示平均亮度较高,约为560尼特。结合低黑值(0),对比度非常高,与OLED面板相似。这种对比度对主观画质也有很大影响。Mini-LED面板没有背光渗漏的问题,但当明亮的物体在黑暗的背景上移动时,由于不同的调光区,可能会出现混浊(光晕)。这个问题可以被挑起,但在日常情况下通常是不可见的。华硕还使用了所谓的星云HDR引擎,这应该是为了减少混浊现象。

548
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
563
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
B140QAN06.S tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 587 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 562.6 cd/m² Minimum: 24.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 535 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
B140QAN06.S, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14"
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
TL140BDXP02-0, IPS, 2560x1440, 14"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
NE140QDM-NX1 (BOE0A1D), IPS-Level, 2560x1600, 14"
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
SHP154D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Samsung ATNA40YK07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
BOE0B74 (NE160QDM-NM4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2"
Display
-3%
-3%
-2%
2%
-1%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
99.6
97.2
-2%
97.4
-2%
99.6
0%
99.9
0%
99.33
0%
99.2
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
99.9
0%
100
0%
100
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
93.4
85.7
-8%
85.5
-8%
87.6
-6%
99
6%
90.01
-4%
Response Times
-26%
163%
34%
28%
-91%
-33%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.2 ?(7.2, 10)
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
2%
8.8 ?(4, 4.8)
49%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
44%
1.36 ?(0.68, 0.68)
92%
50.8 ?(27.6, 23.2)
-195%
35.2 ?(12.8, 22.4)
-105%
Response Time Black / White *
9.9 ?(0.5, 9.4)
15.2 ?(8.4, 6.8)
-54%
6 ?(1.8, 4.2)
39%
7.6 ?(2.8, 4.8)
23%
1.36 ?(0.52, 0.84)
86%
29.6 ?(25, 4.6)
-199%
26.4 ?(11.2, 15.2)
-167%
PWM Frequency
5430
27170 ?(35)
400%
367.6 ?(100)
-93%
12000
121%
14880 ?(100, 500)
174%
Screen
-29%
-79%
-98%
-98%
19%
-4%
Brightness middle
535
354
-34%
480
-10%
434
-19%
414.3
-23%
634
19%
500
-7%
Brightness
563
328
-42%
456
-19%
411
-27%
416
-26%
627
11%
489
-13%
Brightness Distribution
91
86
-5%
80
-12%
89
-2%
99
9%
92
1%
94
3%
Black Level *
0.37
0.48
0.25
0.03
0.02
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.66
-66%
2.62
-162%
3
-200%
4.68
-368%
0.89
11%
1.2
-20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
3.83
-37%
6.71
-140%
7.1
-154%
7.78
-178%
1.79
36%
2.6
7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.6
11%
4.2
-133%
5.1
-183%
1.8
-0%
1.13
37%
1.7
6%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.19 100%
2.22 99%
2.47 89%
2.24 98%
CCT
6337 103%
6542 99%
7122 91%
6204 105%
6207 105%
6497 100%
6791 96%
Contrast
957
1000
1736
21133
25000
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.12
0.7
0.91
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / -21%
27% / 0%
-22% / -48%
-23% / -41%
-24% / -14%
-12% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度(配置文件:本地,目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN灰度(配置文件:本地,目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(配置文件:本地,目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(配置文件:本地,目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker (Profile: Native, target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (Profile: Native, target color space P3)
CalMAN灰度(配置文件:显示-P3,目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN灰度(配置文件:显示-P3,目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(配置文件:显示-P3,目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(配置文件:显示-P3,目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker (Profile: Display-P3, target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (Profile: Display-P3, target color space P3)

Armoury Crate软件提供了不同的颜色配置文件,默认情况下激活了本地配置文件。对于常规使用场景来说,这是一个不错的选择,颜色略微过饱和,所以画面显得更有色彩。我们还用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)分析了配置文件Display P3,与P3参考值相比,它提供了非常准确的颜色,当你想编辑图片或视频时,它是一个理想的选择。还有一个sRGB配置文件。我们无法通过自己的校准来进一步提高图片质量,所以我们目前没有提供配置文件。

当你编辑图片时,你也会为软件设置从多区照明改为单区照明而感到高兴,这意味着整个图片被均匀地照亮了。然而,这对黑值和对比度有很大影响,所以我们建议在所有其他情况下采用多区模式。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 9.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 5430 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 5430 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 5430 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PWM 0 %的亮度
PWM 0 %的亮度
PWM 20 %的亮度
PWM 20 %的亮度
PWM 40 %的亮度
PWM 40 %的亮度
PWM 60 %的亮度
PWM 60 %的亮度
PWM 80 %的亮度
PWM 80 %的亮度
PWM 100 %的亮度
PWM 100 %的亮度

Mini-LED面板的各个调光区以5kHz的频率开启和关闭,这与典型的PWM相一致。我们可以在所有亮度水平上测量这种闪烁,但由于频率高,应该不会有任何问题。响应时间是一个更大的挑战,因为传统的方法(我们和其他行业使用的LED和OLED屏幕)不能正常工作。我们包括了我们的测量结果,但它们并不真正具有代表性,制造商宣传的是3ms。

注意:根据我们的信息,大多数制造商不能正确地确定Mini-LED面板的响应时间。相反,他们通过用传统的背光取代Mini-LED背光来测量响应时间,因为响应时间取决于面板本身而不是背光。我们将尝试在未来复制这个过程并展示结果,但我们显然不能对每一个评测单元都这样做。也可以检查我们是否已经用常规背光测试了面板本身,但对于友达光电的这款特定QHD+面板来说,情况并非如此。

在阳光下
在阳光下
在一个多云的日子里
在一个多云的日子里

高亮度与哑光表面的结合在明亮的环境中效果很好,即使在晴天,我们也没有看到显示内容的问题。视角的稳定性也很好。

视角稳定
视角稳定

性能--Zen4 Phoenix & RTX 4090 笔记本电脑

我们的评测单元是ROG Zephyrus G14的高端SKU,配有Ryzen 9 7940HS(Zen4, 4nm, Phoenix),以及GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑.你还可以将新的Zen4芯片与较小的RTX GPU结合起来,直至RTX 4060 笔记本电脑,而每次降级的价格差异约为500欧元。也有一个入门级的模型,其型号为Ryzen 7 7735HS(Zen3+, Rembrandt-R)和RTX 4050 笔记本电脑为2099欧元。我们在下面的表格中列出了不同的SKU选项。所有版本的ROG Zephyrus G14在发货时都配备了16GB的板载内存,并有一个额外的SO-DIMM插槽,最多可达48GB。

SKU CPU GPU RAM SSD 显示器(QHD+) 价格
GA402NU-N2010W Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen3+) RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 16 GB 1 TB IPS/165 Hz/3ms 2099欧元
GA402XV-N2008W Ryzen 9 7940HS (Zen4) RTX 4060 笔记本电脑 16 GB 1 TB IPS/165 Hz/3ms 2499欧元
GA402XI-NC019W Ryzen 9 7940HS (Zen4) RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 32 GB 1 TB Mini-LED/165 Hz/3ms 2999欧元
GA402XZ-NC021W Ryzen 9 7940HS (Zen4) RTX 4080 笔记本电脑 32 GB 1 TB Mini-LED/165 Hz/3ms 3499欧元
GA402XY-NC020W Ryzen 9 7940HS (Zen4) RTX 4090 笔记本电脑 32 GB 1 TB Mini-LED/165 Hz/3ms 3999欧元
 
 
 

审查设置

预装的Armoury Crate软件提供了不同的功率配置,还有一个手动模式,你可以在15-80瓦特的范围内调整CPU的TDP值。我们在下表中列出了电源配置文件和相应的TDP/TGP值:

功率概况 CPU GPU 压力测试 风扇噪音Witcher 3
静音 45/65瓦 85瓦 CPU: 25瓦
GPU:80 瓦特
39.9 dB(A)
性能 45/65 瓦特 80 + 20 瓦特 CPU:30瓦特
GPU:80 瓦特
46.2 dB(A)
Turbo 80/80 瓦特 100 + 25 瓦特 CPU:35瓦特
GPU:100 瓦特
52.5 dB(A)

我们在下面的基准测试和测量中使用了Turbo模式,以获得最大的GPU性能,但你可以在日常工作中使用Silent模式,只需通过组合键Fn+F5非常舒适地切换电源配置文件。我们还将在风扇噪音部分检查其他电源配置文件的影响。涡轮模式在电池供电时不可用。

你应该习惯使用Armoury Crate软件,因为它提供了很多功能,包括GPU模式(你也可以停用Nvidia GPU)。我们在审查中使用了标准的GPU模式,并结合了Advanced Optimus。

军械库木箱概述 1
军械库木箱概述 1
军械库木箱概述2
军械库木箱概述2

处理器 - Ryzen 9 7940HS

最后,它出现了:第一款采用4纳米Zen4核心的AMD Ryzen 7000移动处理器,代号为凤凰。我们的评论单元配备了45W HS系列的顶级型号,即Ryzen 9 7940HS.与英特尔相反,AMD没有使用混合架构,只是使用了8个成熟的Zen4核心,并支持超线程,因此CPU可以同时执行多达16个线程。该处理器在Turbo模式下的功耗为80W,可以保持这一性能水平。

与旧的Ryzen 9 6900HS相比,AMD成功地将单核性能提高了约15%。Ryzen 9 6900HS但AMD的处理器仍然比目前的英特尔芯片以及高端芯片慢一些。Ryzen 9 7945HX.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2785 (2743.48-2847.79)
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2265 (2136.18-2287.68)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS: Ø2040 (2010.05-2066.65)
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2194 (2063.56-2534.53)
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2282 (2251.36-2406.88)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro: Ø2069 (2052.12-2075.23)

在多核测试中,我们可以看到与之前的G14相比有44%的优势,新的Ryzen 9 7940HS仅被HX CPU以及快速的酷睿i9-13900H中的ROG Zephyrus M16,但英特尔芯片的消耗量也远远超过了100瓦。

总而言之,新的Zen4芯片非常有竞争力,我们将在短期内发布更详细的CPU分析,包括性能和效率基准。我们怀疑在较低的TDP值下,效率会更高。

在电池供电的情况下,CPU的功耗被限制在32瓦,这导致了约30%的性能赤字。更多的CPU基准测试可在 这里.

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
82.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
80.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
79 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
63 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
61.5 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro -6!
Apple M2 Pro
60 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
 
58.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
57.6 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
56.4 pt
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
54.1 pt
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
47.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
46.8 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34521 (32987.6min - 34521.3max) Points +90%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30162 Points +66%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30139 Points +66%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
22015 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
19469 (17696.3min - 19468.6max) Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
18131 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
17442 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (15556 - 18131, n=10)
16867 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
15906 (14978min - 15906.4max) Points -12%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
15783 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
14787 Points -18%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14120 (13823.2min - 14120max) Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
12606 Points -30%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2126 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2043 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
1974 Points +10%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
1940 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
1910 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
1881 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1789 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (1733 - 1832, n=10)
1788 Points 0%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
1763 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
1647 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
1562 Points -13%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1529 Points -15%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13457 Points +89%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
11510 Points +62%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11500 Points +62%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8361 Points +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
7411 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7111 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (6277 - 7111, n=10)
6604 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
6597 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
6108 Points -14%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
5967 Points -16%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5461 Points -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
4829 Points -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
4044 Points -43%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
818 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
788 Points +11%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
756 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
751 Points +6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
733 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
730 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
708 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (680 - 714, n=10)
701 Points -1%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
684 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
612 Points -14%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
601 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
447 Points -37%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5554 (5255.55min - 5554.01max) Points +95%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4819 (4429.68min - 4819.28max) Points +69%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4764 (4425.76min - 4764.17max) Points +67%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4731 (1123.72min - 4730.93max) Points +66%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3441 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
3069 (2871.5min - 3068.66max) Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2848 (2743.48min - 2847.79max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (2470 - 2848, n=10)
2673 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
2616 (2297.79min - 2615.58max) Points -8%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
2535 (2063.56min - 2534.53max) Points -11%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
2407 (2251.36min - 2406.88max) Points -15%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2288 (2136.18min - 2287.68max) Points -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
2069 (2052.12min, 2054.58P1 - 2075.23max) Points -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
2067 (2010.05min - 2066.65max) Points -27%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
307 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
306 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
296 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
301 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
292 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
288 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (277 - 288, n=10)
283 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
273 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
271 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
254 Points -12%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
252 Points -12%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
245 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
230 Points -20%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
247 Seconds * -36%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
223 Seconds * -23%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
222 Seconds * -22%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
201 Seconds * -10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
197 Seconds * -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (182 - 202, n=9)
191.1 Seconds * -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
182 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.1 Seconds * +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
166 Seconds * +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
106 Seconds * +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105 Seconds * +42%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
93 Seconds * +49%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
135927 MIPS +85%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
122254 MIPS +66%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
114658 MIPS +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85859 MIPS +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
79032 MIPS +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
73434 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (66408 - 73434, n=10)
70912 MIPS -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
70222 MIPS -4%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
66498 MIPS -9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
64899 MIPS -12%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
62123 MIPS -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
59889 MIPS -18%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
7319 MIPS +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
7035 MIPS +4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
6909 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6768 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (6417 - 6776, n=10)
6645 MIPS -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6320 MIPS -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
6245 MIPS -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
5974 MIPS -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
5851 MIPS -14%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5840 MIPS -14%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
5605 MIPS -17%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
5590 MIPS -17%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
21058 Points +73%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
19583 Points +61%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
19433 Points +60%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
15410 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15118 Points +24%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
14859 Points +22%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
13400 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
13225 Points +9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
12963 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12179 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (11207 - 12500, n=11)
11902 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
10034 Points -18%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
9647 Points -21%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
2132 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2044 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2025 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2022 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (1823 - 2032, n=11)
1983 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
1974 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
1961 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
1878 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
1854 Points -8%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
1796 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
1614 Points -20%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1558 Points -23%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34.8 fps +54%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
31.9 fps +41%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
29.7 fps +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
22.6 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
21.7 fps -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (20.1 - 22.6, n=9)
21.1 fps -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
18.9 fps -16%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.7 fps -17%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
17.8 fps -21%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
17.7 fps -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
15.8 fps -30%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
60.4 s * -58%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
50.5 s * -32%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
50.1 s * -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.2 s * -26%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
47.7 s * -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
47.6 s * -24%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
46.1 s * -20%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (36.9 - 54.8, n=10)
45.4 s * -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44 s * -15%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
41.2 s * -8%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
39.4 s * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
38.3 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4797 sec * -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
0.4779 sec * -15%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4564 sec * -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4364 sec * -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4308 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (0.4159 - 0.4467, n=10)
0.4297 sec * -3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4292 sec * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4167 sec *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.412 sec * +1%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
0.3982 sec * +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3979 sec * +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.387 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2848 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
174.3 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
288 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
708 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7111 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18131 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1789 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
824 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
105 Points
Help

系统性能

系统性能很好,所有的输入都能无延迟地执行。合成基准测试结果也很好,但我们现在不能提供AIDA的任何结果,因为该应用程序反复导致崩溃。我们已经在与制造商联系,以找到一个解决方案。然而,除此之外,我们在审查期间没有发现任何问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8277 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8253 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
8253 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7830 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7817 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
7731 Points -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7620 Points -8%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7332 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7292 Points -12%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7170 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11703 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11659 Points +10%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11132 Points +5%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10934 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
10868 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10861 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10832 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10633 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
10633 Points 0%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10294 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11046 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10788 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10748 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
10748 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10097 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9912 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
9816 Points -9%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9602 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9274 Points -14%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9043 Points -16%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13347 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
13347 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12183 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11949 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
11755 Points -12%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10817 Points -19%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10682 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10447 Points -22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10319 Points -23%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10118 Points -24%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1972 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1971 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years)
1912 Points +4%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1910 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1839 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1839 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1812 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1787 Points -3%
CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1877 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1845 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years)
1811 Points +3%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1797 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1760 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1760 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1679 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1562 Points -11%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2330 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2233 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2107 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years)
2101 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2085 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
2085 Points 0%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2072 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2044 Points -2%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1869 Points +30%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1798 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years)
1709 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1658 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1442 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1442 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1437 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1333 Points -8%
PCMark 10 Score
8253 points
Help

我们还对Photoshop和Premiere Pro这两个Adobe应用程序进行了PugetBench测试。G14在Adobe Photoshop中的表现非常好,可以跟上强大的(和更大的)对手,但在Premiere Pro中的表现却有所下降。我们还包括在DaVinci Resolve上从6K RAW源文件导出视频(4K H.264)时的性能:

设备 输出时间
华硕ROG Zephyrus G14 (Ryzen 9, 7940HS) 5:26 分钟
联想Legion 7 (Core i9-13900HX, RTX 4090) 4:54 分钟
华硕ROG Flow X16 (Core i9-13900H, RTX 4060) 6:42分钟
微星 Stealth 14 Studio (Core i7-13700H, RTX 4050) 7:50 分钟
华硕ROG Scar 17 SE (Ryzen 9 7945HX, RTX 4090) 4:37分钟
华硕ROG Scar G16 (Core i9-13980HX, RTX 4080) 5:32分钟
Photoshop PugetBench - Overall Score
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1356 Points +9%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1308 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1245 Points
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1237 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1225 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1075 Points -14%
Premiere Pro PugetBench - Overall Score 0.9
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1308 Points +59%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1105 Points +35%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1097 Points +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
913 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
821 Points

DPC-Latency

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(网页浏览、4K YouTube视频播放、CPU负载),评测单位没有显示任何限制,因此它适合实时音频应用。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
4186 μs * -449%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2698.9 μs * -254%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1361.3 μs * -79%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1140 μs * -50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
762.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

2023年的ROG G14再次提供一个M.2-2280插槽,通过PCI-4.0接口连接。我们的评测单元配备了1TB版本的三星PM9A1(980 Pro的OEM版本),整体性能非常好。在持续负载的情况下,性能也非常稳定,这对现代笔记本电脑来说并不是一个问题。开箱后,你可以为自己的文件和应用程序提供865GB。更多的SSD基准测试被列在 这里.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7113 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5265 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 459 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 450 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 69 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 138.4 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 452 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1322 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
91.3 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE -11!
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
77.9 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
77.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
76 pt
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
72.2 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
68.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
68.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4352 (4339.56min - 4351.7max) MB/s +23%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3922 (3902.75min - 3922.43max) MB/s +11%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=85)
3764 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3540 (3522.04min - 3539.62max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3478 MB/s -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2762 (2451.7min - 2761.95max) MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2262 (2258.12min - 2261.57max) MB/s -36%
seq write
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4240 (4228.84min - 4239.93max) MB/s +34%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3931 (3911.33min - 3931.01max) MB/s +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3831 MB/s +21%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=85)
3578 MB/s +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3454 (3434.72min - 3453.8max) MB/s +9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3266 (1415.26min - 3266.31max) MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3172 (3139.23min - 3171.73max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6858 (6042.6min - 6858.23max) MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6715 (5741.16min - 6715.28max) MB/s
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6670 (6396.73min - 6670.28max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=85)
6477 MB/s -4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6449 (5531.66min - 6449.16max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6319 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3563 (3043.18min - 3562.64max) MB/s -47%
seq q8 t1 write
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5168 (5037.36min - 5167.53max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4995 (4991.1min - 4995.28max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4967 (4954.31min - 4967.1max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4867 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=85)
4814 MB/s -3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4606 (4445.88min - 4605.99max) MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3455 (3444.78min - 3454.86max) MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
79.8 (78.65min - 79.84max) MB/s +31%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
79.3 (77.62min - 79.29max) MB/s +30%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=85)
76.7 MB/s +26%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
70.5 (68.62min - 70.48max) MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
62.4 (62.09min - 62.4max) MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
60.9 (60.82min - 60.92max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
259 (255.34min - 258.92max) MB/s +159%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
249 (247.59min - 248.74max) MB/s +149%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +124%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
222 (216.3min - 221.72max) MB/s +122%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
196.8 (195.15min - 196.78max) MB/s +97%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=85)
188.5 MB/s +88%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
100.1 (99.4min - 100.08max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4174 (4158.12min - 4174.4max) MB/s +281%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2816 (2326.5min - 2816.32max) MB/s +157%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2589 MB/s +136%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=85)
2579 MB/s +135%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
1841 (1840.58min - 1841.33max) MB/s +68%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1096 (1074.42min - 1096.28max) MB/s
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
839 (826.17min - 839.11max) MB/s -23%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3559 (3530.12min - 3559.13max) MB/s +702%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3364 (3358.59min - 3364.23max) MB/s +658%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2144 MB/s +383%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=85)
1957 MB/s +341%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1556 (1408.86min - 1555.81max) MB/s +250%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
573 (461.98min - 572.89max) MB/s +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
444 (434.07min - 444.19max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9147 Points +52%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
7568 Points +25%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=85)
6855 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6759 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6037 Points
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4984 Points -17%
Score Read
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3439 Points +117%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2722 Points +72%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2451 Points +55%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=85)
2417 Points +53%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1631 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1582 Points
Score Write
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4026 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3732 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3451 Points -8%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=85)
3272 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3117 Points -16%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2658 Points -29%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5482.07 MB/s +10%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5404 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4975 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4958 MB/s 0%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=85)
4891 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3209 MB/s -35%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4007.19 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3780 MB/s +30%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=85)
3320 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
3131 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2910 MB/s
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2236 MB/s -23%
4K Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
77.7 MB/s +10%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
76.3 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.78 MB/s +5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=85)
72.4 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
70.4 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s -8%
4K Write
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
272.6 MB/s +61%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
218.3 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +25%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=85)
186 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
174.19 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
169.2 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2816.7 MB/s +178%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2323 MB/s +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1885 MB/s +86%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=85)
1855 MB/s +83%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1014 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1014 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3450.87 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3272 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
2920 MB/s -11%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=85)
2754 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2530 MB/s -23%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2161 MB/s -34%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
0.065 ms * -160%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05545 ms * -122%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=84)
0.03777 ms * -51%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.035 ms * -40%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.029 ms * -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.025 ms *
Access Time Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
0.174 ms * -625%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.07 ms * -192%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04715 ms * -96%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=85)
0.03406 ms * -42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.024 ms *
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.013 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

033567010051340167520102345268030153350368540204355469050255360569560306365Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY: Ø6610 (6266.55-6642.66)

GPU性能 - RTX 4090 笔记本电脑

GPU-Z Radeon 780M
GPU-Z Radeon 780M
GPU-Z RTX 4090 笔记本电脑
GPU-Z RTX 4090 笔记本电脑

AMD处理器配备了新的iGPURadeon 780M,它可以处理日常情况下的图形输出。我们将在不久之后的专门文章中对新的iGPU进行详细介绍。Zephyrus G14支持高级优化技术,因此,系统无需重新启动就能切断iGPU。这是一个舒适的解决方案,以确保最大的GPU性能和不浪费任何电力用于所有其他任务。自动切换工作可靠,但当系统切换到dGPU时(例如,当你启动一个游戏时),会有一个小的停顿(1-2秒)。如果你不喜欢这种行为,你也可以切换到Nvidia控制面板中的 "Optimus "设置,这意味着iGPU不会被规避。

RTX 4090 笔记本电脑带有16GB VRAM,在Turbo模式下可消耗125瓦(100W TGP + 25W Dynamic Boost),所以它不是市场上最快的RTX 4090。然而,审查单位的GPU仍然表现得非常好,我们数据库中的平均RTX 4090笔记本电脑只是快了15%。你现在不会找到一个更强大的14英寸设备。与之前的ROG Zephyrus G14Radeon RX 6800S相比,新版本在基准测试中要快65%。

在较长的工作负荷中,GPU的性能是完全稳定的(Time Spy 压力测试:99.1%),但在电池电量方面的性能要低得多。GPU在电池上只能消耗55W,这导致约52%的性能下降。更多的GPU基准测试可在 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
99 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
97.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
91.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
90.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
89.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
87.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
52.8 pt
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
51.5 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
40.3 pt
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
37.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
34.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (54073 - 73027, n=42)
65041 Points +15%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
62240 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
60038 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
58891 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
58631 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
56764 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43982 Points -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
37004 Points -35%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
34206 Points -40%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
26724 Points -53%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
23303 Points -59%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
47798 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (40259 - 53059, n=41)
46365 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
44568 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
43847 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
43525 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
42319 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31524 Points -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
27397 Points -35%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
26398 Points -38%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
20405 Points -52%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
19277 Points -54%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
17256 Points -59%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16950 - 23292, n=43)
20950 Points +17%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20033 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
19157 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18417 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
17885 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
17650 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13169 Points -26%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
9753 Points -45%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
9246 Points -48%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
7763 Points -57%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
7425 Points -58%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
6418 Points -64%
3DMark 11 Performance
41745 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
34720 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
16719 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
35 Seconds * -169%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
31 Seconds * -138%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.7 Seconds * -59%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
15 Seconds * -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
15 Seconds * -15%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
14 Seconds * -8%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
13 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9 - 19, n=39)
12.1 Seconds * +7%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
61 Seconds * -165%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
56 Seconds * -143%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
36.6 Seconds * -59%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
23 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
23 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
22 Seconds * +4%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20 Seconds * +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16 - 24, n=39)
18.3 Seconds * +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
18 Seconds * +22%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
352 Seconds * -23%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
348 Seconds * -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
331 Seconds * -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
293 Seconds * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
287 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
286 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (144 - 305, n=39)
199.1 Seconds * +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
192 Seconds * +33%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
187 Seconds * +35%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
147 Seconds * +49%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
97 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

我们的游戏基准测试显示,与大型游戏笔记本电脑相比,差距略大,这分别是处理器或TDP/TGP配置的结果。G14中的AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS在综合工作负载中被限制在35W,这主要在1080p测试中很明显。然而,整体游戏性能仍然很好,我们看到与去年的模型相比有~50%的优势。

G14的性能在更高的分辨率下也非常好,通常与快速的RTX 4080型号相当,这意味着你可以在QHD的最高设置下轻松玩所有现代游戏。在更长的时间里,游戏性能也很稳定。更多关于RTX 4090的游戏基准测试列于 我们的技术部分.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
97.2 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
91.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
75.2 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
59.3 pt
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 -1!
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56.1 pt
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 -1!
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
52.2 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
178.6 (172min, 173P1) fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
178 fps +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
178 (151min) fps +18%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
175 (150min) fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
150.6 (142min, 145P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=161, last 2 years)
129 fps -14%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.2 (90min) fps -37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
93.8 (79min) fps -38%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75 (69min) fps -50%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
69.8 (66min, 66P1) fps -54%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
58.2 (30min, 47P1) fps -61%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66 (62min, 63P1) fps -56%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
146.1 (5.24min, 100P1) fps +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145.5 (3.79min, 100P1) fps +28%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134 (7.27min, 90.9P1) fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127.7 (9.94min, 83.3P1) fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
114 (8.13min, 83.3P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.9 fps 0%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99.6 (5.85min, 66.7P1) fps -13%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
93 (10.3min, 62.5P1) fps -18%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
88.6 (8.39min, 58.8P1) fps -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
88.4 (8.85min, 62.5P1) fps -22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
78.7 (6.43min, 50P1) fps -31%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
169.6 fps +17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
168.1 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
162.4 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
158.6 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
145.5 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.3 fps -17%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
98.1 fps -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
89.7 (61min) fps -38%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.1 fps -46%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
74.1 fps -49%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
59.9 fps -59%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
338 (43.6min, 243P1) fps +23%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
333 (38min, 227P1) fps +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
318 (29.2min, 228P1) fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
315 (79.3min, 225P1) fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
274 (62.8min, 190P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years)
230 fps -16%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
177.4 (104.5min, 133.9P1) fps -35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
176 (124min, 128P1) fps -36%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
138.6 (37.8min, 106P1) fps -49%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
127 fps -54%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
180.7 (154.9min) fps +35%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
179.7 (153.7min) fps +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
179 (152.4min) fps +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
160.7 (137.1min) fps +20%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
153.6 (134.8min) fps +15%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
153 (134.2min) fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151.3 fps +13%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
148 (129.7min) fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134.1 (115.7min) fps
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
120.5 (107.7min) fps -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
107 (89.7min) fps -20%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
138.8 fps +68%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
131.8 fps +59%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
117.8 fps +42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
116.4 fps +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps +31%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
101 fps +22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
100.9 fps +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.7 fps
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81.7 fps -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
49.6 fps -40%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (38.8 - 56, n=16)
47.7 fps +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
41.9 (10.06min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
38.84 (31.69min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (17.4 - 56, n=34, last 2 years)
36 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
15.9 (10min) fps -59%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (75.7 - 116, n=21)
95.4 fps +22%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86 fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
81.98 (42.1min) fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78 (21.57min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75.69 (14.13min) fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (37.7 - 116, n=56, last 2 years)
69.6 fps -11%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
45.2 (30.3min) fps -42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
38.8 (25min) fps -50%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36 (24min) fps -54%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
31 fps -60%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
130.6 (34.83min) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (91 - 159.7, n=20)
124 fps +18%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
121.41 (57.6min) fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
105.43 (41.37min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
104.49 (20.29min) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (16.7 - 159.7, n=67, last 2 years)
94.4 fps -10%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
86 (32.5min) fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
81.3 (29min) fps -23%
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
64 fps -39%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
57.7 (29min) fps -45%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
49 fps -54%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022
1920x1080 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
170 (96min) fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (141 - 182, n=13)
167.6 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148 (85min) fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145 (85min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141 (78min) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140 (84min) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (15 - 182, n=34, last 2 years)
118.2 fps -16%
2560x1440 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (104 - 137, n=14)
126.8 fps +22%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125 (64P0.1) fps +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
111 (60min) fps +7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
108 (58min) fps +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
104 (58min) fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
104 (53min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (47 - 137, n=31, last 2 years)
96.9 fps -7%
3840x2160 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (63 - 86, n=12)
78.8 fps +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
69 (33min) fps +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
67 (32min) fps +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 86, n=20, last 2 years)
65.7 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63 (29min) fps
Far Cry 6
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (64 - 92, n=10)
79.9 fps +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
73 (65min) fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
64 (54min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (3.38 - 92, n=16, last 2 years)
63.8 fps 0%
2560x1440 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (85 - 146, n=12)
117.2 fps +22%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
110 (85min) fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
108 (85min) fps +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.6 - 146, n=22, last 2 years)
101.2 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96 (79min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
72 (64min) fps -25%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (91 - 167, n=12)
124.8 fps +31%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
117 (91min) fps +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 167, n=27, last 2 years)
111.4 fps +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
111 (85min) fps +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
95 (73min) fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95 (81min) fps

我们还检查了一些带有Nvidia DLSS upsampling的质量预设和帧生成的标题。如果有的话,我们还激活了光线追踪。以下结果显示了令人印象深刻的性能提升:

标题 Nativ DLSS质量+FG+RT(如果有的话) 差异
Hogwarts Legacy 43.1 FPS 80.5 FPS +86 %
Miles Morales 50.8 FPS 94.9 FPS +87 %
Cyberpunk 2077 31.3 FPS 81.9 FPS +162 %
Witcher 3 4.00 33.6 fps 73.6 fps +119 %
Dying Light 2 34.8 FPS 91.8 FPS +163 %

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø150.6 (142-161)
CPU/GPU数据Witcher 3
CPU/GPU数据Witcher 3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K DLSS4K
GTA V (2015) 172.3 114 108.9 143.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 150.6 116.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 166.5 161 142.1 134.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 186.7 145.5 113
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 121.3 105.2 82.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 142 130 123 75
Strange Brigade (2018) 306 274 218 126.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 166 166 135 73
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 144 129 102 61
F1 2021 (2021) 276 169.6 140 89.9
Far Cry 6 (2021) 103 95 96 64
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 114.72 105.43 78 38.84
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 168 141.12 103.39 53.27
F1 22 (2022) 220 98.4 65.9 36.8
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) 87.1 77.4 58.9 48.4 33.1
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 147 141 104 86 63
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 116.43 102.64 82.09 48.14
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 82.2 74.9 66.1 37.2
The Last of Us (2023) 103.1 92 68.2 54.3 34.9

排放--表面温度适中的游戏机

系统噪音

两个风扇的噪音水平在很大程度上取决于电源配置文件,它们在涡轮模式下对负载的反应非常快。这对这种模式来说是没问题的,我们建议你使用静音模式来完成要求不高的任务,当你需要更多功率时,只需切换到另一个模式。你也应该在较慢的配置文件中检查你最喜欢的游戏的性能。如果性能尚可,你可以从更安静的风扇中获益。G14在Turbo模式下的噪音相当大,为52 dB(A),但风扇噪音没有显示出任何恼人的频率迹象,考虑到性能的数量和紧凑的机箱,噪音水平仍然可以接受。有很多较大的游戏笔记本电脑的风扇声音甚至更大。在合成和游戏基准测试中,我们偶尔注意到一些轻微的电子噪音。

静音 性能 涡轮
3DMark 06 29.5 dB(A) 33 dB(A) 49.5 dB(A)
Witcher 3 39.9 dB(A) 46.2 dB(A) 52.2 dB(A)
Cyberpunk 2077 39.9 dB(A) 46.2 dB(A) 52.2 dB(A)
压力测试 39.9 dB(A) 46.2 dB(A) 52.2 dB(A)
Cinebench R23 Multi 34.7 dB(A) 39.9 dB(A) 52.2 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle
23.6 / 23.6 / 33 dB(A)
Load
49.5 / 52.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.829.129.83130.727.532.52530.828.229.931.427.927.234.7312825.931.433.628.224.331.54027.130.229.530.928.82928.95024.525.325.225.328.124.224.56324.429.425.725.126.522.5248029.832.723.136.323.321.720.410030.32222.925.822.122.420.812522.922.223.523.422.619.221.716021.420.421.422.219.118.219.520025.327.121.724.320.417.920.125032.125.621.930.4201722.231531.526.423.32720.815.723.740032.629.924.929.518.913.925.150033.829.124.630.619.412.32563036.531.928.733.12113.1288003934.128.836.123.11129100038.833.628.33822.510.828.9125041.836.631.839.424.310.531160041.536.530.239.124.210.329.6200041.335.628.439.322.810.328.8250041.335.128.838.921.510.528.331504235.928.838.719.410.528.1400039.932.724.53717.710.924.6500041.434.626.538.317.711.327.1630041.633.924.537.71611.424.7800037.628.620.332.112.811.521.41000029.821.314.62511.911.415.81250026.618.614.321.911.711.316.31600023.517.313.618.411.110.516.1SPL52.246.239.949.533.123.639.7N8.25.33.26.71.70.53.2median 36.5median 29.9median 24.5median 32.1median 20median 11.4median 24.7Delta7.36.14.373.12.54.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
Noise
14%
5%
2%
-2%
15%
off / environment *
23.3
23.3
-0%
24
-3%
24.7
-6%
23.8
-2%
23.9
-3%
Idle Minimum *
23.6
23.3
1%
24
-2%
24.7
-5%
23.8
-1%
23.9
-1%
Idle Average *
23.6
23.3
1%
26
-10%
24.7
-5%
23.8
-1%
23.9
-1%
Idle Maximum *
33
23.3
29%
31
6%
30.9
6%
30.6
7%
23.9
28%
Load Average *
49.5
34.7
30%
45
9%
40
19%
44.2
11%
26
47%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52.2
42.1
19%
43
18%
51.5
1%
60.1
-15%
Load Maximum *
52.2
42.1
19%
45
14%
51.5
1%
60
-15%
43.2
17%

* ... smaller is better

温度

考虑到高性能和紧凑的尺寸,华硕对G14的表面温度管理得非常好。这款机箱在轻度工作负荷下非常凉爽,在压力测试和游戏过程中,我们可以测量到中心上部的温度高达46℃。在打字时,这一点很明显,手指会有点出汗,但没有任何限制。由于采用了ERGO-LIFT铰链,你甚至可以把G14放在你的腿上,在负载下。总而言之,带有液态金属和蒸汽室的冷却解决方案效果非常好。

压力测试期间的行为与广告中的规格相同,专用GPU明显受到青睐。几分钟后,处理器的功率降至35W,GPU的功率降至100W。在压力测试之后,并没有立即出现性能下降。

CPU/GPU数据压力测试
CPU/GPU数据压力测试
Max. Load
 42.3 °C45.1 °C45.6 °C 
 40.7 °C46.4 °C47 °C 
 32.4 °C31.8 °C36.9 °C 
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
45.5 °C46.5 °C43.1 °C
44.2 °C46.2 °C39.2 °C
40.3 °C42.6 °C39.2 °C
Maximum: 46.5 °C
Average: 43 °C
Power Supply (max.)  55.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8 °C / -14.4 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Heat
-14%
-16%
-1%
-0%
13%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
40.6
14%
55
-17%
51.3
-9%
43
9%
46.9
-0%
Maximum Bottom *
46.5
42.6
8%
55
-18%
44.4
5%
46.4
-0%
41.7
10%
Idle Upper Side *
25.9
38
-47%
30
-16%
27.2
-5%
28.2
-9%
21.4
17%
Idle Bottom *
28
37
-32%
32
-14%
26.6
5%
28.4
-1%
21.4
24%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

华硕实现了两个低音单元和两个高音单元,它们位于键盘上方,将声音导向用户。整体效果非常好,声音显得很丰富,有足够的音量。与之相比Apple的MacBook Pro 14相比,该扬声器系统缺乏一点冲击力。总而言之,这些模块仍然适合音乐和视频,但由于风扇噪音,我们建议在游戏过程中使用耳机或耳麦。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.527.22527.230.63124.327.64029275024.226.46322.530.48021.734.710022.446.712519.250.616018.254.720017.960.82501762.931515.766.340013.968.450012.366.163013.167.18001170.4100010.872.5125010.574.1160010.365.6200010.366.5250010.567.1315010.565.1400010.960.1500011.363.4630011.466800011.5641000011.463.21250011.365.91600010.554.7SPL23.680N0.549.3median 11.4median 65.6Delta2.53.132.732.228.62824.428.231.434.42633.324.443.118.454.919.76616.367.113.763.917.466.317.769.415.472.811.473.31270.711.473.91073.410.271.91071.910.673.210.774.111.272.211.67511.969.912.372.812.469.912.665.812.565.912.465.111.864.523.984.30.566.6median 12median 70.71.93.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XYApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 迷你LED的运行时间成本

消耗功率

我们记录到新的ROG 14在最大亮度下的最大空闲消耗为15瓦特,这是令人惊讶的效率。在游戏过程中,你可以期待170瓦左右,在压力测试开始时,我们可以看到220瓦的最大消耗,最终也会稳定在170瓦。因此,240瓦的电源适配器是完全足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.46 / 0.79 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9.4 / 14.2 / 14.5 Watt
Load midlight 79 / 220.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14"
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK, IPS-Level, 2560x1600, 14"
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-31%
-3%
15%
-2%
44%
-77%
-42%
Idle Minimum *
9.4
10.2
-9%
7
26%
7.9
16%
7.6
19%
2.4
74%
16.2 ?(6 - 32.3, n=29)
-72%
Idle Average *
14.2
26
-83%
14
1%
11.1
22%
12.3
13%
11.3
20%
23.1 ?(10.9 - 42.6, n=29)
-63%
Idle Maximum *
14.5
26.7
-84%
22
-52%
11.8
19%
17.6
-21%
11.5
21%
34.2 ?(11.6 - 57.9, n=29)
-136%
Load Average *
79
89.3
-13%
98
-24%
107.4
-36%
111
-41%
59.6
25%
130.5 ?(79 - 201, n=29)
-65%
Witcher 3 ultra *
172
158.7
8%
141
18%
111
35%
117.1
32%
55.9
67%
Load Maximum *
220.8
227.5
-3%
188
15%
140.4
36%
245.8
-11%
100
55%
324 ?(221 - 418, n=29)
-47%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø172 (167.7-177.9)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø190.3 (169.3-221)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.3 (8.09-15.2)

Power consumption external screen

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø111.5 (109.4-113.6)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø110.4 (108.7-111.5)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø37.9 (32.7-57.7)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø108.5 (103.7-110.6)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø160.1 (130.2-165.2)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø159.1 (155-163.2)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.16 (0.804-10.7)

电池运行时间

76Wh的电池容量没有变化,但运行时间与之前的机型相比仍然有点短,这应该主要是迷你LED面板的结果。新的AMD芯片可能也会消耗更多的电力,Ryzen 9 7945HX已经是这种情况。我们将在我们的CPU分析中仔细研究这个问题。在150尼特(最大亮度的50%)下,我们的Wi-Fi测试运行了7.5小时,在最大亮度下运行了约5小时,都是在60赫兹下。在165赫兹下,150尼特的Wi-Fi运行时间降至6小时,但在最大亮度下的差异可以忽略不计,只有10分钟。

总而言之,电池运行时间还可以,但不是很好,大多数对手的运行时间更长。我们稍后将公布视频测试的结果(我们在150尼特下的常规测试以及全亮度下的HDR测试)。当设备打开时,完全充电需要大约90分钟;30分钟后可获得50%的电量,50分钟后可获得80%的电量。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 112)
7h 28min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 112)
4h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 58min
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK
R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S, 76 Wh
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, 70 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
44%
10%
9%
8%
71%
9%
H.264
431
561
30%
917
113%
WiFi v1.3
448
571
27%
572
28%
535
19%
374
-17%
807
80%
Load
58
93
60%
53
-9%
45
-22%
77
33%
70
21%
Reader / Idle
732
1085
486
Witcher 3 ultra
45

Pros

+ 非常好的底盘
+ 非常高的系统性能
+ 快速的CPU/GPU组合
+ USB 4.0、Wi-Fi 6E、G-Sync和PCIe-4.0
+ 优秀的Mini-LED面板,磨砂表面
+ 良好的键盘
+ 良好的声音系统
+ 快速的microSD读卡器

Cons

- 游戏时非常响亮
- 内存部分被焊接
- 与前代产品相比,运行时间较短
- 电池的性能明显降低

结论 - ROG Zephyrus G14提供了一个令人印象深刻的软件包

在审查中:华硕ROG Zephyrus G14。测试模型由华硕德国公司提供。
在审查中:华硕ROG Zephyrus G14。测试模型由华硕德国公司提供。

华硕提高了新的2023年ROG Zephyrus G14相当的性能,为游戏玩家和内容创作者提供了一个非常强大的14英寸笔记本,具有足够的性能。高质量的机箱与去年相比没有变化,但现在配备了AMD以及Nvidia的最新和最先进的产品。

Nvidia的GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑运行功率高达125瓦(游戏期间约100-110瓦),不符合最快版本的性能,但它们通常保留给更大的游戏笔记本电脑。Zen4 CPU在综合工作负载中也被减慢了速度,但这只是紧凑的机箱的结果。这对1080p的游戏性能有一点影响,但你仍然可以在原生QHD分辨率下流畅地玩所有现代游戏。

新的AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS也给人留下了良好的第一印象。AMD设法提高了单核性能,9核CPU可以在多核测试中与现代英特尔CPU竞争,尽管它们消耗的功率更大。我们不久将对新的CPU和Radeon 780M iGPU进行深入分析(包括效率测量)。

14英寸笔记本的最大性能:由于Ryzen 9 7940HS和GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop,新的ROG Zephyrus G14在一个紧凑的14英寸机箱中提供了非常强大的组件。整体性能非常好,你还可以得到一个伟大的165赫兹迷你LED面板。如果你能负担得起,这几乎是一个完美的包装。

Mini-LED面板也在几乎所有方面都有令人信服的表现,尽管MacBook Pro 14仍然提供卓越的亮度值。该面板在游戏方面的效果非常好,所包含的色彩配置文件提供了非常准确的色彩。当你编辑图片时,还可以将多区照明切换为单区照明。

这种水平的性能显然必须被冷却。表面温度控制得很好,但是风扇的声音很大,特别是在涡轮模式下。然而,考虑到性能,我们仍然认为结果是完全可以的。如果你想要的话,电源配置文件也提供了一个很好的平衡和退出的风扇噪音。电池运行时间只是平均水平,而且在电池供电时性能会降低,但这几乎是我们所有的批评。

不过,ne ROG G14的价格并不便宜,为4000欧元。较小的SKU提供了更好的性价比,但你应该记住,与具有175W TGP限制的大型游戏笔记本相比,RTX 4090和RTX 4080 SKU都不能利用GPU的全部潜力。RTX 4070笔记本电脑和更低的情况则不同,因为这些GPU在游戏过程中最多只消耗~105W(与制造商的TGP主张无关)。

我们已经迫不及待地想知道竞争对手是否像Razer Blade 14,Alienware x14宏碁掠夺者Triton 300 SE可以跟上。就目前而言,新的ROG Zephyrus G14在14英寸游戏领域并没有真正的对手。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY - 04/30/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 79%
Weight
67 / 10-66 → 100%
Battery
77 / 95 → 81%
Display
96%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
84 / 95 → 88%
Noise
75 / 90 → 83%
Audio
86%
Camera
47 / 85 → 55%
Average
81%
90%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ROG Zephyrus G14评测--配备AMD Zen4 Phoenix和RTX 4090的紧凑型游戏笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-05- 1 (Update: 2024-08-15)