宏碁Swift X 14笔记本电脑评论与RTX 3050。挑战不足的i5-1240P
宏碁Swift X 14 (2022)提供了一个 GeForce RTX 3050在一个轻,1.4公斤(〜3磅)的情况下,结合16:10显示器在2.2K分辨率,英特尔桤木湖P CPU (酷睿i5-1240P 在我们的测试设备中,或者是酷睿i7-1260P),一个非常快的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘(512GB),以及16GB焊接的DDR5-4800内存。
总的来说,宏碁将办公、多媒体和全高清游戏结合在一个紧凑的14英寸笔记本电脑中。
虽然也有一个模型有一个更强大的 RTX 3050 Ti可用,但竞争对手为GPU和CPU提供了更高的功率限制,如戴尔的 Inspiron 14 Plus配有酷睿i7-12700H和RTX 3050(50瓦)或华硕的 Vivobook Pro 14具有类似的硬件和OLED屏幕,但Honor MagicBook 14配有GeForce RTX 2050也不应该被低估。
额外的宏碁评论。
- Acer Swift X 16(i7-1260P, 弧形A370M)
- 宏碁Swift X SFX16-52G(i5-1240P, Arc A370M)
- Acer Nitro 5(i7-12700H, RTX 3060)
- Acer TravelMate P6(i7-1185G7, Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs)
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.6 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 18.87 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE i5-1240P, A370M | 1.8 kg | 21.3 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 R5 5500U, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 1.4 kg | 18.89 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳:Swift X由坚固的金属制成
外壳基本保持不变,所以你可以在我们的 对上一代机型的评论.然而,今年的盖子抵制了扭曲的企图,不能再用一只手打开。尺寸略有变化,内置16:10显示屏,键盘现在是黑色的,而不是白色的。
它的外形尺寸相当于13英寸笔记本电脑的尺寸。它是最紧凑的,1.4公斤(约3磅),也是我们比较领域中最轻的设备,所有的竞争对手也都提供了一个专用的图形单元。
设备。宏碁Swift X 14中的HDMI 2.1和Thunderbolt技术
宏碁Swift X获得了第二个TB4连接,但两个端口都放在了左侧。USB-A在两边都有。HDMI被更新到2.1版本(4K,120 Hz)。我们的HDMI 2.1电缆一到就会检查。
沟通
Networking | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
网络摄像头
维护
担保
宏碁在德国为其Swift系列提供通常的两年保修。
输入设备。为经常打字的人提供坚实的键盘和可回收的触摸板
键盘
与去年的Swift X 14相比,单级照明键盘已经有所改进。 去年的Swift X 14.压力点很突出,按键的阻力也很明显,因此,尽管按键行程很短,但快速打字成功没有任何问题。除了取消了单独的 "向上 "和 "向下 "键之外,其布局仍然是一样的。键盘在打字时没有任何阻力。
触摸板
触摸板是新的,由称为 "OceanGlass "的回收塑料制成。尽管这个触摸板与较大的 Swift X 16的触摸板,但其响应行为明显更好、更准确。拖放、捏合变焦和滚动都没有任何问题。虽然表面对滑动的手指有一些阻力,但触摸板并不坏。
显示屏:宏碁笔记本电脑的2.2K 16:10面板,100% sRGB。
在显示屏方面,宏碁Swift X 14提供了一些受欢迎的改进。不仅是改成16:10的格式,而且更高的2,240 x 1,400像素的分辨率,导致在阅读哑光IPS显示屏的内容时有更高的享受。330尼特的良好亮度与我们比较领域中的竞争对手处于同一水平。然而,400尼特仍然是在户外明亮的天空下舒适阅读显示屏的理想选择。
总的来说,该面板的数值出乎意料地接近于戴尔的 Inspiron 14 Plus.在1,621:1,对比度很丰富,加上0.21尼特的低黑值,你可以享受饱和的黑色。白色值是最佳的6573K。
Honor 的3:2显示屏 MagicBook 14也显示了类似的数值,尽管它使用PWM进行亮度控制。在我们的测试装置中,情况并非如此。华硕的 Vivobook Pro 14拥有迄今为止我们比较中最好的面板,提供了一个具有90赫兹刷新率的3K OLED显示屏,但它也使用了PWM。
我们注意到在我们的面板上有强烈的背光渗漏,这在常规使用过程中甚至清晰可见。OLED面板、更高的刷新率或更高的分辨率的选项是不存在的。
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 344 cd/m²
Contrast: 1638:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.99
ΔE Greyscale 4.31 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.04% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.21% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 NV140DRM-N62, IPS-LED, 2240x1400, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 InfoVision 140NWHE, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 HD140ZB-01A, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T SAMSUNG: SDC4171, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 AUO B140HAN06, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE AU Optronics AUOBD9E, , 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -3% | 25% | 1% | 5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.21 | 68.8 -2% | 67.9 -3% | 99.41 42% | 72 3% | 75.75 8% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.04 | 99.3 0% | 98.5 -1% | 99.94 1% | 99 0% | 100 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.59 | 69.5 -4% | 68.7 -5% | 94.79 31% | 73 1% | 76.51 5% |
Response Times | 19% | 7% | 91% | -18% | 27% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 32.8 ? 22% | 37.2 ? 11% | 3 ? 93% | 49 ? -17% | 37 ? 12% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 22.8 ? 16% | 26.3 ? 3% | 3 ? 89% | 32 ? -19% | 16 ? 41% |
PWM Frequency | 28400 ? | 360 | ||||
Screen | -1% | 0% | 39% | -60% | 11% | |
Brightness middle | 344 | 331.1 -4% | 330 -4% | 384 12% | 395 15% | 411 19% |
Brightness | 330 | 326 -1% | 320 -3% | 385 17% | 391 18% | 364 10% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 85 5% | 90 11% | 98 21% | 89 10% | 81 0% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.29 -38% | 0.21 -0% | 0.07 67% | 0.18 14% | 0.295 -40% |
Contrast | 1638 | 1142 -30% | 1571 -4% | 5486 235% | 2194 34% | 1393 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.39 | 2.23 7% | 1.8 25% | 1.75 27% | 9.73 -307% | 1.73 28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.24 | 5.44 -4% | 4.7 10% | 3.41 35% | 16.33 -212% | 2.7 48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.99 | 0.63 36% | 1.6 -62% | 2.32 -134% | 1.41 -42% | 1.18 -19% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.31 | 3.6 16% | 3 30% | 1.06 75% | 7.5 -74% | 1.26 71% |
Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.21 100% | 2.18 101% | 2.39 92% | 1.5 147% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 6573 99% | 6022 108% | 6697 97% | 6440 101% | 6678 97% | 6616 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
1% | 1% /
1% | 52% /
44% | -26% /
-41% | 14% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率达到99%,这不仅有利于图像质量,而且允许更多的图像处理。 例如,对色彩准确的图形来说很重要的AdobeRGB色彩空间,只覆盖了72.6%。
色彩偏差很小,平均DeltaE值略低于<2.4,通过我们的校准可以进一步改善到略低于<1。这包括灰度,在交付状态下的DeltaE为4.3,仍然显示出一些偏差。轻微的青色色调也可以通过校准进行调整。你可以从亮度分布图旁边的方框中的链接下载我们的免费颜色配置文件。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于其哑光表面与330尼特的亮度相结合,该显示器可以在户外轻松阅读,至少在阴凉处或间接光线下。在阳光直射下,亮度就太低了。
性能。RTX 3050在电池运行中比英特尔Xe图形慢
宏碁Swift X 14是为混合办公和偶尔的全高清游戏和/或图形工作而设计的,这应该是由包括的 GeForce RTX 3050来实现的。所有型号中焊接的16GB DDR5-4800内存也支持半专业的使用。
除了酷睿i5-1240P外,还有配备英特尔的酷睿i7-1260P包括一个1TB的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,而不是我们测试单元的512GB版本。AMD的版本已经不能用了。
测试条件
使用宏碁的快速访问应用程序,你可以在三种电源模式中进行选择。在主电源操作中,这些对处理器和图形性能没有任何影响。CPU在大约15秒内被提升到50瓦,然后一直以25瓦的功率运行。变化的是风扇的行为,我们在下面的排放部分将详细讨论。
静音模式只对CPU+GPU综合负载期间的性能产生影响,并与Windows的最佳性能电源配置相结合。但它只会影响GPU的性能,然后开始波动(平均约25瓦)。在电池运行时,性能分布在两个组件之间,与所选模式无关。9瓦(CPU)+11瓦(DGPU)。
最有趣的情况是将性能模式与Windows的最佳省电模式相结合。RTX 3050的动态提升GeForce RTX 3050将被激活(35瓦+5瓦),图形性能增加5-10%,这取决于应用程序。
然而,我们在宏碁的快速访问应用程序中,结合最佳性能Windows配置文件和性能模式,进行了GPU测试以及所有其他性能测试。另一方面,WLAN和视频电池运行时间是在相应的平衡模式下确定的。
处理器
我们的测试单位宏碁Swift X 14是由一台 酷睿i5-1240P运行,来自英特尔。其四个性能核心的最大时钟速度为4.4GHz。在这里,它们达到了3.2 GHz,然后在大约15秒后平缓到2.1 GHz,因此,CPU的时钟速度至少保持在1.7 GHz的基本时钟速度之上。几分钟后,温度位于65℃(149°F)。
由于冷却系统能够持续冷却64瓦--在CPU/GPU联合负载的情况下,25瓦(PL1)的功率限制略微令人失望。
在较大的Swift X 16中,同样的处理器在35瓦的PL1下运行速度快了约15%至25%。前代机型采用的是 Ryzen 5 5500U六核处理器,在多核任务中处于同一水平。那时候,你还可以选择一个 Ryzen 7 5800U八核处理器,它通常比相同TDP的Alder Lake处理器运行得更快。
华硕的 Vivobook Pro 14配备了Ryzen 5 5600H只是勉强超过了。根据不同的应用,Honor's MagicBook 14和戴尔的 Inspiron 14 Plus与我们的测试设备保持约40%至60%的距离,这是因为它们的Alder Lake H处理器速度更快。
我们测量了性能,用 "Throttlestop "工具将功率限制提高到45瓦,同时温度上升到最高87℃(188.6°F)。这样一来,多核应用的性能提升高达33%。然而,我们不建议在制造商规定的极限之外运行CPU。我们只想证明这里浪费了什么样的潜力。
至少,在电池运行时,性能并没有下降,甚至在静音模式下也是如此。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 -1! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (7872 - 10624, n=5) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (1415 - 1430, n=5) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (2995 - 3691, n=5) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (551 - 560, n=5) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (1390 - 1925, n=5) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (227 - 229, n=4) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (319 - 391, n=4) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (39618 - 45985, n=4) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (5285 - 5405, n=4) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (6093 - 7026, n=4) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (1411 - 1450, n=4) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (9.68 - 11, n=4) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (50.9 - 60.2, n=4) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (0.54 - 0.546, n=4) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 |
* ... smaller is better
AMD每瓦特的性能显著提高
看看下面的测量结果,你可以看到AMD版本也会为今年的Swift X 14带来的优势。ARyzen 7 5800U也用于前代产品,运行效率提高了约70%。
特别是在只有25瓦的低处理器性能限制下,AMD处理器在Swift X 14(2022)的性能和效率方面会有明显的优势。
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2405 - 9694, n=16) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (7407 - 49934, n=16) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (415 - 2462, n=16) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (29405 - 76736, n=16) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2135 - 6540, n=16) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (5113 - 23992, n=16) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (8849 - 90370, n=16) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (101.6 - 812, n=16) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1154 - 5258, n=16) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (11873 - 43661, n=16) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
系统性能
该系统的性能与较大的 Swift X 16同样的CPU和SSD。在我们的比较领域,只有配备Alder Lake H处理器的系统表现更好。
特别是在网上冲浪时,我们看到与去年的机型相比有明显的改善。然而,在我们的比较领域中,没有任何测试装置能够接近于 配备M2或M1 SoC的MacBook Air或M1 SoC的MacBook Air。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
Youtube: 2160p60 CPU Load
Sunspider: 1.0 Total Score
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Speedometer 2.0: Result
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Octane V2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (4881 - 5898, n=14) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (8890 - 10652, n=14) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (6118 - 8510, n=14) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (5169 - 7583, n=14) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1392 - 1553, n=9) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1344 - 1524, n=9) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1426 - 1647, n=9) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1253 - 1545, n=9) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
Youtube / 2160p60 CPU Load | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 (10, 7) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 (43) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1 - 55, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE (42, 1) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (4 - 15, n=13) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T (22) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 (47) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 (44, 25) |
Sunspider / 1.0 Total Score | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (105.6 - 106.4, n=2) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (575 - 1422, n=15) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook (110 - 674, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (238 - 266, n=4) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Subnotebook (117 - 478, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (203 - 418, n=6) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Octane V2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Subnotebook (35801 - 106359, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (70915 - 80743, n=7) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (119.2 - 268, n=14) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (217 - 231, n=8) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5863 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (23312 - 70537, n=16) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (18989 - 70553, n=16) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (23454 - 62496, n=16) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (85.1 - 188.3, n=11) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
SSD基准测试清楚地表明,这里使用的美光3400是一款PCIe 4.0 SSD。相应地,它在我们的比较领域中只被Honor 的特别快的三星PM9A1所超越。 MagicBook 14.
一个积极的观点:相比之下 宏碁Swift X 16使用相同的固态硬盘,Swift X 14最多只有轻微的节流(12-13%)。这可能是由于在这里使用了一个热管。
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 33% | -32% | -72% | -17% | -44% | |
Seq Read | 4704.18 | 5233 11% | 2892.47 -39% | 2525.69 -46% | 3200 -32% | 2091 -56% |
Seq Write | 3592.34 | 3857 7% | 1670.44 -53% | 1118.9 -69% | 3430 -5% | 1856 -48% |
4K Read | 61.99 | 85.14 37% | 60.79 -2% | 56.06 -10% | 63.1 2% | 27.51 -56% |
4K Write | 185.87 | 216.33 16% | 182.28 -2% | 135.06 -27% | 141.6 -24% | 116.3 -37% |
4K-64 Read | 1365.43 | 2468.58 81% | 854.69 -37% | 413.48 -70% | 1354 -1% | 812 -41% |
4K-64 Write | 2366.95 | 3003.26 27% | 1772.46 -25% | 1237.33 -48% | 1802 -24% | 1415 -40% |
Access Time Read * | 0.041 | 0.023 44% | 0.042 -2% | 0.137 -234% | 0.064 -56% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.025 | 0.02 20% | 0.087 -248% | 0.056 -124% | 0.026 -4% | 0.033 -32% |
Score Read | 1898 | 3077 62% | 1205 -37% | 722 -62% | 1737 -8% | 1048 -45% |
Score Write | 2912 | 3605 24% | 2122 -27% | 1484 -49% | 2287 -21% | 1717 -41% |
Score Total | 5734 | 8195 43% | 3898 -32% | 2525 -56% | 4936 -14% | 3292 -43% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1718.9 | 2093.45 22% | 1890.47 10% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 309.48 | 447.36 45% | 378.45 22% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 954.72 | 1195.09 25% | 1125.37 18% | |||
DiskSpd | 57% | -27% | -42% | 16% | -31% | |
seq q8 t1 read | 6487 | 5264 -19% | 3552 -45% | 2617 -60% | 6439 -1% | 2466 -62% |
seq q8 t1 write | 3952 | 4928 25% | 2450 -38% | 1688 -57% | 3911 -1% | 1987 -50% |
seq read | 2093 | 3503 67% | 2293 10% | 2047 -2% | 2619 25% | 1777 -15% |
seq write | 3933 | 3965 1% | 2045 -48% | 1675 -57% | 3900 -1% | 1711 -56% |
4k q32 t16 read | 1108 | 3424 209% | 663 -40% | 477 -57% | 1522 37% | 1416 28% |
4k q32 t16 write | 2494 | 3540 42% | 435 -83% | 506 -80% | 2390 -4% | 1453 -42% |
4k q1 t1 read | 65.8 | 90.7 38% | 63 -4% | 57.8 -12% | 65.3 -1% | 27.8 -58% |
4k q1 t1 write | 121.2 | 233 92% | 157.9 30% | 113.1 -7% | 208 72% | 133 10% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 45% /
42% | -30% /
-31% | -57% /
-59% | -1% /
-3% | -38% /
-38% |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在我们的测试装置中,来自Nvidia的专用图形装置是一个 GeForce RTX 3050,但另一种情况是,同样的图形卡的Ti版本也可以使用。它适用于全高清游戏和轻松的3D或视频工作。
由于宏碁已经决定采用35瓦的最低TGP,戴尔 Inspiron 14 Plus采用相同的GPU但50瓦的TGP,在3D Mark基准测试中超过宏碁Swift X 14 18%。华硕的 Vivobook Pro 14也被允许以高达50瓦的功率为其RTX 3050供电。如果你选择 RTX 3050 Ti在购买时,Swift X应该能够赶上竞争对手,因为Schenker的新款Vision 14在相同的35瓦特TGP下,以该GPU引领我们的性能评级。
至少,较大的 Swift X 16与英特尔 弧形A370M和前代机型配备的 GTX 1650可以超过30%。但另一种情况是,后者也有配备RTX 3050的。
在电池运行中,我们建议停用Nvidia GPU来进行游戏和其他图形密集型任务。这是因为在这种情况下,英特尔的集成Iris Xe7图形单元的运行速度约为3倍,因为RTX 3050只提供5瓦的功率。
dGPU / iGPU。 | GeForce RTX 3050 | GeForce RTX 3050 @battery | Iris Xe7 Graphics @battery |
---|---|---|---|
Time Spy 分数: | 4,097 | 523 (-87%) | 1,429 (+173%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 14005 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32049 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9032 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4097 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
游戏时,合成基准的趋势仍在继续。由于35瓦的TGP很低,所以 GeForce RTX 3050在这里使用的Nvidia的RTX 3050最终勉强落后于 GeForce RTX 2050在Honor 魔法书14.最大的优势是英特尔 弧形A370M在Swift X 16(+57%).采用相同GPU但为50瓦版本的竞争者,还有 RTX 3050 Ti在Schenker Vision 14平均每秒钟多出20%的帧数。
在较新的游戏中,高细节的全高清游戏也经常可以顺利进行。
God of War | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX |
GRID Legends - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 163.6 | 156.4 | 103.5 | 51.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 191.6 | 100.5 | 57.7 | 39.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 125.2 | 115.7 | 111 | 106.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 99.1 | 51.2 | 36.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 92.1 | 81.2 | 65.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 75 | 66 | 61 | 57 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 222 | 93.5 | 75 | 65.1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 105 | 62 | 50 | 42 |
God of War (2022) | 50.6 | 41.3 | 32.7 | 22.6 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 116.6 | 93.4 | 77.6 | 55.7 |
排放物。尽管有静音模式,但Swift X 14的风扇始终处于活动状态。
噪声排放
无论选择哪种电源模式,你都会听到持续的风扇噪音。即使是静音模式也不会真的安静,甚至在空闲运行时也不会。但至少,这时的噪音将几乎与周围的噪音融为一体。
只要你打开一个网站,风扇的声音就会变大。然而,在静音模式下,这仍然在可接受的范围内,在我们的测试装置中既没有任何恼人的高频噪音,也没有电子噪音。
尽管在压力测试中几乎达到了50dB(A),但由于风扇噪音的频率很低,我们并没有感觉到这是特别令人讨厌的。在这里,风扇在静音模式下也保持明显的安静,没有性能上的损失。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26.6 / 26.6 / 27.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 49.7 / 49.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i5-12500H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | 8% | -5% | 9% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 24.3 3% | 23.2 7% | 25.4 -2% | 25 -0% | 26 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.6 | 24.3 9% | 23.2 13% | 25.4 5% | 25 6% | 26 2% |
Idle Average * | 26.6 | 24.3 9% | 23.2 13% | 25.4 5% | 25 6% | 27 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.5 | 24.3 12% | 23.2 16% | 30.9 -12% | 26.4 4% | 27.4 -0% |
Load Average * | 49.7 | 39.8 20% | 47.5 4% | 56 -13% | 36.5 27% | 42.2 15% |
Load Maximum * | 49.7 | 50.6 -2% | 51.7 -4% | 56 -13% | 43 13% | 44.3 11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.4 | 51.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度发展总体上还可以。只有在人工制作的压力测试中,我们测量到一些热点,温度高达51℃(124°F)。在实际应用中,温度保持在可接受的范围内。另一方面,采用AMD处理器的 前代产品的AMD处理器仍然较冷,而戴尔 Inspiron 14 Plus是我们比较领域中最冷的。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-7.7 °C / -13.9 F).
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M | Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 15% | 23% | 4% | 6% | 21% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49.8 | 44.6 10% | 40 20% | 42.3 15% | 52 -4% | 42.1 15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 51 | 51.6 -1% | 36.4 29% | 49.6 3% | 50.4 1% | 45.3 11% |
Idle Upper Side * | 39.6 | 26.1 34% | 27 32% | 34.2 14% | 30 24% | 25.5 36% |
Idle Bottom * | 32.7 | 26.8 18% | 29.2 11% | 37.9 -16% | 32.4 1% | 25.3 23% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
压力测试再次表明,CPU的25瓦限制是非常保守的选择,因为我们没有测量到任何高温(76℃,169°F),甚至在Prime95+FurMark的综合负载下也没有。在这段时间里,处理器仍然能够保持1.7GHz的基本时钟速度。
在长达一小时的TheWitcher 3 的压力测试中,dGPU仍然达到了1280 MHz的时钟速度,这比RTX 3050的最大提升速度高约20%。 RTX 305035瓦的TGP。在FurMark压力测试中,它的提升值仍然比最大提升值低约10%。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | 0.02 | 200 | 28 | - |
Prime95压力 | 1.85 | 200 | 69 | - |
FurMark 压力 | 0.14 | 930 | 60 | 66 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 0.8 | 1.170 | 79 | 75 |
Prime95+FurMark的压力 | 1.7 | 810 | 76 | 73 |
发言人
两个朝下的2瓦扬声器得到了改进。虽然它们仍然不能提供任何低音,但至少它们在86dB(A)时相当响亮,能够填满一个较大的房间。中音和高音也能以线性和平衡的方式再现。
然而,为了享受音乐或电影,你应该使用外部音频设备,这些设备可以通过音频端口或蓝牙连接,没有任何问题。
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理。比AMD型号的电池寿命更长
消耗功率
在空闲操作以及简单的应用程序如Office和网络浏览时,宏碁Swift X 14的功耗或多或少符合该级别的平均水平。戴尔 笔记本14 Plus消耗的电力要多得多,而前辈的 配备AMD CPU的Swift X明显更有效率。
在负载情况下,系统最大消耗了96瓦,但这要么是在不现实的压力测试中的情况,要么只是在游戏时的几秒钟。在那之后,消耗量大多在70瓦左右,所以附带的100瓦充电器是足够的。
Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.6 Watt |
Idle | 7.3 / 8.3 / 13.1 Watt |
Load |
70 / 95 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS-LED, 2240x1400, 14" | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE i5-1240P, A370M, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, , 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 R5 5500U, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -33% | 1% | 6% | 25% | -19% | 27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.3 | 4.5 38% | 6.3 14% | 6.6 10% | 5.7 22% | 3.4 53% | 7.17 ? 2% | 4.49 ? 38% |
Idle Average * | 8.3 | 10.1 -22% | 10.3 -24% | 9.6 -16% | 8 4% | 6 28% | 10.4 ? -25% | 7.66 ? 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.1 | 10.5 20% | 20 -53% | 7.3 44% | 10.4 21% | 9.2 30% | 14.8 ? -13% | 9.56 ? 27% |
Load Average * | 70 | 83.2 -19% | 106.2 -52% | 73 -4% | 74 -6% | 57 19% | 89.7 ? -28% | 46.6 ? 33% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 70.2 | 85 -21% | 96.1 -37% | 74.4 -6% | 65 7% | 57.3 18% | ||
Load Maximum * | 95 | 107.1 -13% | 136.5 -44% | 119 -25% | 108.5 -14% | 93.6 1% | 124.8 ? -31% | 68.6 ? 28% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
当在平衡模式下上网,亮度调整到150尼特时,宏碁Swift X 14(2022)比采用AMD处理器的前代产品多持续了40分钟。这离良好的11小时并不遥远。
在我们的比较领域的竞争对手持续的时间差不多,除了戴尔的 Inspiron 14 Plus,它提前3.5小时停止运行。
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 58.7 Wh | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 75 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 64 Wh | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE i5-1240P, A370M, 56 Wh | Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 R5 5500U, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 58.7 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 3% | -35% | 9% | -22% | 5% | 23% | |
H.264 | 739 | 755 2% | 586 -21% | 896 ? 21% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 643 | 665 3% | 432 -33% | 569 -12% | 583 -9% | 605 -6% | 719 ? 12% |
Load | 86 | 90 5% | 54 -37% | 112 30% | 54 -37% | 100 16% | 116.6 ? 36% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 74 |
Pros
Cons
结论。宏碁Swift X 14与竞争对手相比没有任何真正的优势
从理论上讲,RTX 3050可以把宏碁Swift X 14变成一个强大的全高清游戏笔记本电脑。但在实践中,图形性能不幸地完全崩溃,远离了出口。然而,我们猜测,未来的BIOS更新可能会补救这种情况。除此以外,这款轻巧的14英寸笔记本电脑远远领先于英特尔 弧形A370M在其大型的16英寸兄弟姐妹,即 Swift X 16.
前代产品已经有了图形处理器,最高可达 RTX 3050 Ti和一个AMD Ryzen 7 5800U,在相同的TDP下提供比英特尔Alder Lake处理器更高的性能。
此外,风扇几乎一直在运转,即使静音模式在这里提供了一些帮助,但在性能上没有任何损失。这是难以理解的,同时考虑到CPU的功率限制为25瓦,而竞争对手的设备如戴尔 Inspiron 14 Plus和Honor MagicBook 14为其CPU持续提供40瓦的功率,同时保持更低的温度和噪音。另一方面,它们的重量多了200至300克(约7-10.6盎司)。有了AMD版本,这些问题中的许多可能都可以避免。
同时,宏碁的性能模式出乎意料地没有带来任何性能提升,甚至Windows自己的 "最佳性能 "也没有任何改变。
那些可以不使用16:10显示屏和Thunderbolt的人最好使用更安静的前辈,即使今年的机型也在键盘、网络摄像头、扬声器和连接设备方面带来了一些小的改进。
对于那些有织女星iGPU就足够的人来说, Acer Swift 3AMD(2021),它具有相同的结构,已经可以从600欧元(约598美元)起找到。
或者你可以在竞争对手中进行挑选。最好的显示屏(3K OLED + 90 Hz,但有反射)可以在华硕Vivobook Pro 14 ,其他方面也令人印象深刻。戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus ,在中档的14英寸多媒体笔记本电脑中提供了最快的CPU/GPU组合,但你必须接受较低的电池寿命,约7小时,而不是Swift X 14的11小时。最后, 是Honor'的MagicBook 14 ,配备3:2显示屏和RTX 2050 ,它没有显示出任何明显的缺陷,并且以1300欧元(约1295美元)的类似价格出售。
以同样的价格,华硕Zephyrus G14 ,配备120-Hz WQHD显示屏(16:9)、Ryzen 9 5900HS、RTX 3050与60瓦的TGP,以及可扩展内存,也很有意思,尽管它更厚更重。
价格和可用性
在进行这项测试时,宏碁Swift X SFX14-51G(i7-1260P, 512 GB/16 GB, RTX 3050)在宏碁的网上商店上市,价格为1200美元但目前已无库存。亚马逊提供相同型号的,价格为1230美元.
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876
- 11/02/2022 v7 (old)
Marvin Gollor