Gigaset GS5评论 - 温和的升级,在德国的智能手机
Possible competitors in comparison
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.5 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Gigaset GS5 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 210 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
77.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2020 | Realme 7i Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 208 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
79.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 205 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
83.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G SD 732G, Adreno 618 | 157 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例、设备和操作
在Gigaset GS5看起来很像它的 前辈但它是一个有点重,只有一个双摄像头设置在后面,仍然是可更换的后盖平齐。与GS4一样,玻璃背面被整齐地框在塑料中,但卡槽现在在盖子下面。可拆卸的电池很容易接触到,而且事先取出SIM卡托盘也不再需要了。总的来说,我们喜欢它的制造质量。
GS5的功能相当令人印象深刻。除了一个成熟的双SIM卡(nano)插槽,还有一个microSD存储插槽,可以接受最大512GB的存储卡。不过,microSD插槽不支持exFAT文件系统。Gigaset没有提供关于充电速度的详细信息,只是说电池可以在两小时内充电,用18W的电源适配器应该可以大致做到。通过无线方式,智能手机的充电功率可达15W。还集成了一个FM广播接收器。缺乏DRM认证是令人失望的。
谷歌Android 11被用作操作系统,并做了最小的修改。Android 12应该在明年提供,Gigaset承诺将在三年内进行安全更新。
Gigaset GS5的通信模块工作在一个适当的水平。交流无线局域网提供稳定的传输速率,我们参考Netgear Nighthawk AX12路由器。支持的移动频率涵盖了欧洲最重要的频段,但没有更多,也没有5G。
当把GS5拿在耳边时,它的语音质量很好。所有的通话参与者都能清楚地理解,并能自然地听到。噪声抑制在嘈杂的环境噪声中留下了相当平庸的印象。虽然我们在Gigaset的智能手机上仍然可以理解,但我们确实听起来很闷,音量波动很大。扬声器听起来有点空洞,但在安静的环境中,总体上还是有说服力的,可以理解。支持VoLTE和WLAN通话等功能。
GS5的系统速度令人满意。尽管采用了较新的SoC,但时不时会出现一些小插曲。然而,玻璃表面具有良好的滑行性能,而且输入在触摸屏上得到了精确的实现。背面的指纹扫描仪有很高的识别率和吸引人的解锁速度。还有一个不太安全的2D人脸识别。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Gigaset GS5 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Realme 7i | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Gigaset GS5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Gigaset GS5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G | |
Realme 7i |
相机 - 双光学与48MP的Gigaset GS5
Gigaset已经增加了GS5的百万像素范围。前置镜头现在有1600万像素,照片的质量是类似于的 GS4并在一个体面的水平。
背面的设置现在少了一个镜头,但超广角镜头现在接管了以前微距镜头的任务。这对特写镜头有积极作用,尽管不应期待奇迹。得益于4800万像素的主摄像头,照片明显更好,看起来比GS4的照片更明亮、更生动。在变焦方面没有太大的变化,最终以4倍的数字放大率结束,质量相当不令人信服。
前置摄像头记录的视频最好是全高清(30帧),而主摄像头则是QHD(1440p @ 30帧)。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light显示屏 - 无闪烁的液晶显示屏,亮度更高
Gigaset没有改变显示尺寸与前辈相比,但增加了一些亮度,这是一个类似的水平,在手动模式和APL50测量。黑值还可以,并提供了一个清晰的对比度。然而,最低亮度太高,所以眼睛在黑暗中会感到不必要的紧张。
色彩再现也不是特别准确。灰度非常冷,所有的颜色都是过饱和的。因此,它们往往看起来有点花哨,但不会让人过于讨厌。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 513 cd/m²
Contrast: 1315:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.91
Gigaset GS5 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.5" | Realme 7i IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -33% | 12% | 93% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50 ? | 66.8 ? -34% | 40 ? 20% | 2.8 ? 94% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30.8 ? | 40.8 ? -32% | 30 ? 3% | 2.4 ? 92% |
PWM Frequency | 926 ? | 373.1 ? | ||
Screen | -3% | -9% | 57% | |
Brightness middle | 513 | 543 6% | 597 16% | 815 59% |
Brightness | 517 | 512 -1% | 569 10% | 809 56% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 85 -9% | 91 -2% | 98 5% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.63 -62% | 0.74 -90% | |
Contrast | 1315 | 862 -34% | 807 -39% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.2 | 4.9 32% | 5.47 24% | 1.3 82% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.8 | 8.6 20% | 12.11 -12% | 3.1 71% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.6 | 6.3 27% | 6.9 20% | 2.6 70% |
Gamma | 1.91 115% | 2.23 99% | 2.363 93% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 8643 75% | 8120 80% | 8091 80% | 6544 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-9% | 2% /
-5% | 75% /
66% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.4 ms rise | |
↘ 21.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命
芯片 Helio G85 SoC的Gigaset GS5是较新的比 Helio P70在GS4,但不一定更快。3DMark中的图形计算显示前一年的模型有小的优势,但GFXBench测试再次扭转局面。一般来说,性能更多的是在中端。GS5在任何时候都不会产生大量的热量,它只是在触摸时感到温暖。
下巴上的扬声器在中等音量下听起来相当平衡,但在较高的音量下,轰鸣声和噪音非常强烈。Gigaset已经改善了音频插孔,它提供了一个干净的声音输出(SNR:94.37 dBFS)。那些喜欢蓝牙的人可以使用音频编解码器SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC。
电池运行时间总体良好,但比前代产品略差,尽管采用了更大的电池。
PCMark for Android | |
Work 3.0 (sort by value) | |
Gigaset GS5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (6596 - 9437, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Realme 7i | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (8655 - 8698, n=3) |
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Gigaset GS5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Realme 7i | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (7.5 - 22, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Gigaset GS5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Realme 7i | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (8 - 9.7, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years) | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Gigaset GS5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Realme 7i | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (5 - 13, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Gigaset GS5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Realme 7i | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G | |
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.1 - 3.5, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years) |
Gigaset GS5 | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Realme 7i | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 163% | 26% | 98% | -3% | 466% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 319.8 | 858 168% | 316.4 -1% | 481.8 51% | 283 ? -12% | 1839 ? 475% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 269 | 381.7 42% | 187.2 -30% | 269 0% | 194.6 ? -28% | 1425 ? 430% |
Random Read 4KB | 160.5 | 174.6 9% | 77.4 -52% | 145 -10% | 82.7 ? -48% | 277 ? 73% |
Random Write 4KB | 31.37 | 167.1 433% | 89.5 185% | 141.6 351% | 55.1 ? 76% | 309 ? 885% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
扬声器
Gigaset GS5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Gigaset GS5 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G 5000 mAh | Realme 7i 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G 4250 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi Websurfing | 868 | 1235 42% | 1307 51% | 692 -20% | 984 ? 13% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - GS5以独特的卖点令人信服
Gigaset GS5以其简单的设计和良好的结构令人信服,但它也有独特的卖点,无线充电高达15W和一个可交换的电池,这是没有发现在这个价格范围。此外,操作系统的更新长达3年,并不总是在这个领域看到。
Gigaset GS5以可更换的电池、良好的制造质量、Qi充电和大大改进的摄像头而令人信服,但它需要在系统速度和缺乏5G方面做出妥协。
此外,这款德国制造的手机提供了一个大内存和一个好的音频插孔。在摄像头方面也向前迈进了一大步。另一方面,GS5也不得不忍受批评。SoC不是最快的之一,没有对microSD的exFAT支持,DRM认证和5G也不存在。
强大的竞争主要来自于远东地区,其形式为 Galaxy A32 5G或 小米11 Lite 4G.
价格和可用性
Gigaset GS5
- 12/10/2021 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt