Notebookcheck Logo

Gigaset GX4评论：可持续的坚固耐用的智能手机

可持续发展bolide。

Gigaset的GX4是一个坚固耐用的智能手机，带来了许多被遗忘的优点：一个可交换的电池，音频插孔，和microSD支持。但这还不是全部，Gigaset还提供了一个长期的更新供应。不过，也有一些妥协，我们在评论中详细说明。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
Gigaset GX4 (GX Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.10 inch 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyro, Barometer, Proximity, Magnetometer, OTG, FM radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 8), LTE (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 12.2 x 160.9 x 80
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, 15W wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.9, 0.8 µm, PDAF) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2), Camera2-API: Full
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0, Fixfocus)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: onscreen, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), hand strap, 24 Months Warranty, IP68, MIL-STD-810H, DRM Widevine L3, Head-SAR: 0.625 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.465 W/kg; Single-Band-GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, SBAS, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
270 g
Price
349 Euro
Links
Gigaset homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
78.1 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Gigaset GX4
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2		270 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.10"1560x720
81.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L		235 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
81.1 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Nokia XR20
SD 480, Adreno 619		248 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
74.3 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Blackview BV5200
Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300		268 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.10"1600x720

外壳和功能：Gigaset GX4带有IP68和MIL-STD-810H等级。

Gigaset GX4是明确无误的坚固耐用的智能手机，但它没有那么笨重比许多其他车型从中国。通过IP68认证，它具有防尘和防水功能。根据MIL-STD-810H标准，抗震性似乎主要是指抗震性，但遗憾的是Gigaset没有提供确切的细节。这款智能手机并不十分轻巧，但拿在手里的感觉仍然很好。构建质量是令人信服的，材料印象也相当好。前面使用了康宁大猩猩5号玻璃。

聚碳酸酯背面是可拆卸的，可以接触到5,000毫安时的电池，无需工具即可更换。两个SIM卡插槽和micro-SD卡插槽也位于盖子下面。该插槽不是最快的之一，不幸的是不支持exFAT文件系统。

不仅前面的小状态LED是实用的，而且相机周围的环也可以在收到信息时亮起。另外，它也可以用于手电筒功能。

(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

尺寸比较

❌
171.6 mm 81.5 mm 10.6 mm 248 g168.8 mm 79.9 mm 9.9 mm 235 g161.6 mm 77.9 mm 13.7 mm 268 g160.9 mm 80 mm 12.2 mm 270 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=76, last 2 years)
29.2 MB/s +93%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
27.9 MB/s +85%
Nokia XR20
  (Angelbird V60)
22 MB/s +46%
Blackview BV5200
  (Angelbird V60)
19.6 MB/s +30%
Gigaset GX4
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.1 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Gigaset GX4 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø29.5 (4.06-44.7)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø39.3 (27.6-48.9)
Gigaset GX4 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.8 (35.3-83.8)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.9 (47.7-76.5)

通信、软件和操作：两次功能更新和五年的安全补丁

Gigaset GX4支持Wi-Fi 5，这不是最现代和最快的标准，但它表现相当稳定，在我们的参考华硕ROG狂欢节GT-AXE11000路由器的测试。在移动连接方面必须做出很大的妥协，因为GX4不支持5G，而且频段覆盖也只是限于欧洲的常见频段。

Gigaset手机的语音质量相当不错，当拿在耳朵上时，但不应该对噪音抑制寄予很大期望。扬声器模式没有一个特别长的麦克风范围，用户使用时听起来很空洞。

虽然Android 12不是谷歌操作系统的最新版本，但将来会有Android 13和Android 14的更新。Gigaset还承诺在上市后提供长达5年的安全补丁，堪称典范。

视觉上引人注目的功能键，可以在设置中分配多达三个不同的任务，似乎很实用。这包括开始录音、截图、控制手电筒、拨打紧急电话，或调用任何应用程序。电源按钮在另一侧，那里也集成了指纹传感器。这通常能可靠地工作。另外，也可以通过前置摄像头设置面部识别。

Networking
Gigaset GX4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
373 (min: 189) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
364 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
944 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
910 (min: 677) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia XR20
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AX12
630 (min: 561) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
649 (min: 589) MBit/s ∼100%
Blackview BV5200
802.11a/b/g/n
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
367 (min: 349) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
330 (min: 306) MBit/s ∼91%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (866-952)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø910 (677-949)
Gigaset GX4 Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (348-369)
Gigaset GX4 Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (189-389)

照相机 - 48MPix，没有花哨的东西

用GX4自拍（纵向模式）。
用GX4自拍（纵向模式）。

前面的摄像头的Gigaset GX4提供了一个坚实的成像性能，但喜欢过度的对比度。视频可以记录在全高清（30 FPS），最好。

主摄像头采取体面的照片在充足的光线，只有变焦拍摄几乎是可用的。有一个额外的超广角镜头，它也可以作为微距镜头使用。质量是令人满意的，但不是压倒性的。至少有一个人像、一个夜间和一个专业模式，后者还允许保存RAW数据。

用主摄像头拍摄的视频只能以每秒30帧的速度记录，通常是全高清。如果你需要更多的分辨率，你也可以使用不寻常的QHD格式。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
0.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigaset GX4: 5.81 ∆E min: 0.22 - max: 13.13 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
50.4 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
58 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
37 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
71.1 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
76.2 ∆E
67.8 ∆E
50 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigaset GX4: 43.49 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 76.18 ∆E

显示屏：明亮的60赫兹IPS面板

子像素结构
子像素结构

IPS面板的Gigaset GX4措施6.1英寸，只提供720p的高清分辨率，以及一个固定的刷新率60 Hz的。亮度是相同的，无论是在一个纯白色的显示（645 cd / m²），以及在APL18测量。不管是环境光传感器被激活，还是亮度被手动控制，也没有什么区别。因此，只要不是在烈日下，在户外就能确保体面的可读性。

黑色数值略有增加，但由于良好的亮度，对比度仍然清晰动人。最低亮度也在一个非常好的水平上。在所有配置文件中，色彩再现都非常冷，但这在日常使用中似乎并不令人感到困扰。

缺乏脉冲宽度调制的亮度控制也是积极的。

597
cd/m²		645
cd/m²		579
cd/m²
594
cd/m²		645
cd/m²		564
cd/m²
590
cd/m²		640
cd/m²		561
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 645 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 601.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.58 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 645 cd/m²
Contrast: 1402:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08
Gigaset GX4
IPS, 1560x720, 6.1"		Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"		Nokia XR20
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Blackview BV5200
IPS, 1600x720, 6.1"
Response Times
57%
50%
21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
70.38 ?(31.45, 38.93)
31 ?(16, 15)
56%
36 ?(19, 17)
49%
45.2 ?(23, 22.2)
36%
Response Time Black / White *
32.8 ?(11.67, 21.13)
14 ?(9, 5)
57%
16 ?(5, 11)
51%
31.2 ?(13.7, 17.5)
5%
PWM Frequency
1163 ?(15)
Screen
-3%
27%
6%
Brightness middle
645
510
-21%
599
-7%
400
-38%
Brightness
602
495
-18%
598
-1%
405
-33%
Brightness Distribution
87
92
6%
99
14%
80
-8%
Black Level *
0.46
0.46
-0%
0.33
28%
0.28
39%
Contrast
1402
1109
-21%
1815
29%
1429
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
8.2
7.41
10%
4.52
45%
5.8
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
15
13.26
12%
7.6
49%
10.77
28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
11.2
10.6
5%
4.2
62%
7.7
31%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.518 87%
2.279 97%
2.107 104%
CCT
10614 61%
10050 65%
7309 89%
8415 77%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
27% / 9%
39% / 32%
14% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.67 ms rise
↘ 21.13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
70.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31.45 ms rise
↘ 38.93 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

灰度（色彩模式：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（色彩模式：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（色彩模式：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
户外 (像片: Daniel Schmidt)
户外活动
视角稳定 (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命：一次充电可达三天

在Gigaset GX4是由一个 联发科Helio G99与4GB LPDDR4x工作内存。考虑到这款坚固耐用的智能手机可能会有很长的使用寿命，增加一些内存当然更好。然而，日常性能相当不错，大多数应用程序运行得很流畅。

表面温度在任何时候都保持较低。即使在持续的负载下，GX4也不会变得不温不火。SoC对产生的热量也没有问题，并能提供稳定的性能。

单声道扬声器提供了一个体面的声音输出，但肯定不是一个娱乐性能。媒体最好通过耳机来消费。最常见的音频编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC）通过蓝牙无线支持，并且通过电缆提供了一个非常低噪音的音频插孔（信噪比：90.41 dBFS）。

大5,000毫安时的电池有助于Gigaset GX4实现长时间运行。在测试中，智能手机也被证明是非常节俭的待机，所以它应该有可能去三天不充电，在适度使用。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench | Octane V2
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points +89%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
773 Points +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (490 - 576, n=17)
547 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
540 Points 0%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
540 Points
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
504 Points -7%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2802 Points +57%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1670 - 1981, n=17)
1828 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1810 Points +2%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1782 Points
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1662 Points -7%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points +76%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (714 - 720, n=2)
717 Points 0%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
714 Points
Blackview BV5200
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
188 Points -74%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points +76%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1916 - 1965, n=2)
1941 Points +1%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1916 Points
Blackview BV5200
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
512 Points -73%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12113 Points +34%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
10589 Points +18%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11379, n=17)
9894 Points +10%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9009 Points
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7090 Points -21%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=71, last 2 years)
3075 Points +10%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2791 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2600 Points -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2471 - 2791, n=16)
2593 Points -7%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2438 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=71, last 2 years)
3259 Points +23%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2655 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2326 - 2655, n=16)
2434 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2433 Points -8%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2302 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3425 Points +1%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3398 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3101 - 3471, n=16)
3346 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=71, last 2 years)
3280 Points -3%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3076 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 22303, n=160, last 2 years)
7934 Points +182%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2813 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2648 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2543 - 2843, n=16)
2642 Points -6%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2566 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33560, n=160, last 2 years)
11805 Points +345%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2653 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2375 - 3908, n=16)
2552 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2459 Points -7%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2448 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10259, n=160, last 2 years)
4663 Points +31%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3622 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3102 - 3798, n=16)
3575 Points 0%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3568 Points
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3090 Points -13%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=109, last 2 years)
2859 Points +112%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2464 Points +82%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1351 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1165 - 1364, n=17)
1239 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1183 Points -12%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
980 Points -27%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 22004, n=182, last 2 years)
7761 Points +492%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2472 Points +89%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1311 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1232 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1011 - 1340, n=17)
1195 Points -9%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
977 Points -25%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=189, last 2 years)
2134 Points +472%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
686 Points +84%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
373 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
347 Points -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (330 - 378, n=17)
346 Points -7%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
294 Points -21%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=187, last 2 years)
2127 Points +488%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
684 Points +89%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
362 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
337 Points -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (323 - 366, n=17)
337 Points -7%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
287 Points -21%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)
51.6 fps +91%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
30 fps +11%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
27 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (12 - 44, n=17)
17.3 fps -36%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps -41%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps -48%
Blackview BV5200
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
3.6 fps -87%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)
82.4 fps +449%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
34 fps +127%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps +20%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
16 fps +7%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (14 - 18, n=17)
15.7 fps +5%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps
Blackview BV5200
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
2.3 fps -85%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)
38.5 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
19 fps 0%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
19 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8.3 - 28, n=17)
11.3 fps -41%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10 fps -47%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.9 fps -53%
Blackview BV5200
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
2.9 fps -85%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)
33.2 fps +453%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
13 fps +117%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6.5 fps +8%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6 fps
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.9 fps -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5.4 - 6.5, n=17)
5.88 fps -2%
Blackview BV5200
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
0.85 fps -86%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 52, n=203, last 2 years)
15.6 fps +500%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
5.9 fps +127%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.6 fps
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2.5 fps -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2.2 - 2.8, n=17)
2.5 fps -4%
Blackview BV5200
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
0.38 fps -85%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
25445 Points +36%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (17228 - 25005, n=17)
20999 Points +13%
Gigaset GX4
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
18658 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
18237 Points -2%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
17816 Points -5%
Blackview BV5200
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
4798 Points -74%
Gigaset GX4Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 ProNokia XR20Blackview BV5200Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
28%
5%
-79%
-22%
189%
Sequential Read 256KB
672.59
841.6
25%
485
-28%
253.4
-62%
696 ?(392 - 895, n=52)
3%
1867 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years)
178%
Sequential Write 256KB
256.9
484.7
89%
452
76%
57.5
-78%
224 ?(132.7 - 512, n=52)
-13%
1451 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years)
465%
Random Read 4KB
171.26
170.6
0%
174.8
2%
22.2
-87%
137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52)
-20%
279 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years)
63%
Random Write 4KB
207.62
204.2
-2%
146.2
-30%
21.1
-90%
84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52)
-59%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years)
50%

温度

Max. Load
 35.5 °C33.3 °C35.4 °C 
 35.1 °C33.7 °C33.2 °C 
 34.4 °C33.3 °C32.6 °C 
Maximum: 35.5 °C
Average: 34.1 °C
31.2 °C32.8 °C33.3 °C
30.6 °C31.2 °C33.6 °C
30.4 °C30.8 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 33.6 °C
Average: 31.7 °C
Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
99.6 (4.1min - 4.11max) % +1%
Nokia XR20
99.1 (1.747min - 1.763max) % +1%
Gigaset GX4
98.2 (2.22min - 2.26max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia XR20
99.6 (5.86min - 5.89max) % 0%
Gigaset GX4
99.3 (8.08min - 8.13max) %
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
99 (14.6min - 14.7max) % 0%

Legend

 
Gigaset GX4 Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Nokia XR20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Blackview BV5200 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 32 GB eMMC Flash

扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.837.12527.936.73124.335.54028.237.45036.744.26322.240.88025.441.71002140.812518.642.216015.445.620015.146.125013.154.13151257.440012.758.250011.862.363012.965.480010.470100013.373.4125013.278160012.178.7200012.277.9250012.979.7315014.884.7400015.886.7500016.180.8630014.473.1800013.675.51000013.581.21250014.474.2160001561.2SPL25.992.5N0.786.7median 13.5median 73.4Delta1.310.840.441.240.538.127.328.631.832.640.634.225.224.721.320.918.923.616.835.820.243.5164718.252.91458.71364.217.268.517.970.619.571.919.575.122.27721.177.325.976.619.976.715.177.914.766.31553.514.859.213.87114.969.714.758.615.450.431.731.786.21.31.363.3median 16.8median 64.2median 74.82.31311.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigaset GX4Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigaset GX4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 74.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 74.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 74.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Gigaset GX4
5000 mAh
1143 min
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=204, last 2 years)
985 min -14%
Nokia XR20
4630 mAh
927 min -19%
Blackview BV5200
5180 mAh
903 min -21%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh
768 min -33%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 109)
19h 03min

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ 耐用
+ 可持续发展理念
+ 长时间的更新供应
+ 良好的音频插孔
+ 双卡和microSD

Cons

- 没有5G
- 蹩脚的SoC，内存少
- 只有60赫兹的酷炫LCD

结论：具有强大核心竞争力的Gigaset GX4

在审查：Gigaset GX4。测试设备由德国Gigaset公司提供。(照片：Daniel Schmidt)
在审查：Gigaset GX4。测试设备由德国Gigaset公司提供。(照片：Daniel Schmidt)

的Gigaset GX4是一个很好的，特别是坚固的日常伴侣。高端功能或5G在这里没有发现，但坚固的智能手机说服了一个结论性的整体概念。这对于可持续性来说尤其如此，因为外包装不含任何塑料，而是由纸板制成。此外，还有一个可更换的电池和长时间的更新供应，这在这个价格范围内通常不是必须的。在出现缺陷的情况下，Gigaset为您提供足够数量的服务中心，特别是在欧洲。

在Gigaset GX4是一个强大的日常伴侣与巨大的耐力。

妥协，因为GX4是一个有点老式的，在这方面的720p分辨率和60赫兹刷新率的显示器时，必须作出妥协。此外，它没有DRM认证，所以相应的受保护内容只能以标准清晰度消费。可选的mircoSD的exFAT文件系统也不支持。

考虑到其价格，Gigaset GX4提供了一个良好的整体包装。如果你想多一点的一切，你应该看看在 吉格赛特GX6但将不得不支付更多。情况是类似的，当它涉及到 三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro.

价格和可用性

在Gigaset GX4可以直接从Gigaset商店购买，但也可从大多数其他零售商和亚马逊。

Gigaset GX4 - 03/30/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
87%
Battery
92%
Display
81%
Games Performance
34 / 64 → 52%
Application Performance
71 / 86 → 82%
Temperature
93%
Noise
0%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
49%
Average
72%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Gigaset GX4评论：可持续的坚固耐用的智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-04- 3 (Update: 2023-04- 3)