Notebookcheck Logo

HTC Desire 22 Pro 5G智能手机评测--快速的互联网现在有了一个可接受的价格

去Metaverse?

400美元,HTC Desire 22 Pro的推出价格太高了。然而,在此期间,它的价格明显便宜了。由于这款智能手机据说因其独有的Metaverse功能而得分很高,我们的追评揭示了这款HTC手机是否真的有什么特别之处。
5G Android ARM Smartphone
HTC Desire 22 Pro
HTC Desire 22 Pro (Desire Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2412 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glass , glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), 5G (n1/​n3/​n7/​n20/​n28/​n41/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.4 x 166.3 x 76.9
Battery
4520 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18-watt charging, 15-watt wireless charging, 5-watt reverse charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.79, phase comparison AF, dual LED flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.4, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, charging cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP67-certified, FM radio, notification LED, fanless, waterproof
Weight
206 g
Price
450 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
78.2 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
HTC Desire 22 Pro
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
206 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2412x1080
81.9 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Motorola Moto G72
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
166 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
81.4 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.72"2400x1080
81.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Xiaomi Poco X5
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

外壳和功能 - 闪亮的背面和IP认证

Metaverse听起来像是一个逃离现实的好地方。在这个地方,你不仅可以创造自己的化身,还可以创造世界本身,并根据你的想象力为两者量身定做。然而,这一趋势还没有真正掀起。通过Desire 22 Pro,宏达电提供了一款特殊的中档手机,在一些国家甚至还用NFT或加密货币等其他时髦的流行语来宣传。

乍一看,这款手机从外观上看很正常。制造商采用了玫瑰金和黑色的时尚组合,其中一种颜色占主导地位,这取决于不同的变体。后面是闪亮的,有一个波浪图案。不幸的是,该设备非常善于吸引指纹和其他肮脏的污点。

角落很圆润,Desire 22 Pro的手感很好,但是,206克的重量,是一个相对较重的设备。显示屏边框也有点厚,这意味着手机正面只有81%的面积是真正的屏幕。

我们对HTC Desire 22 Pro的IP67认证印象深刻,它至少应该允许在水中短暂浸泡,而且外壳承诺可以完全防止灰尘。

有了慷慨的8GB内存和128GB UFS 2.2闪存,Desire 22 Pro在内存方面有很好的保障。此外,一些老的优点,如通知LED和调频收音机,在其他手机上是很难得到的。同样,该设备还配备了用于移动支付的NFC。

如果需要,内存可以通过microSD读卡器进行扩展。在使用我们的microSD Angelbird V60参考卡的测试中,它取得了一流的成绩。

HTC Desire 22 Pro
HTC Desire 22 Pro
HTC Desire 22 Pro
HTC Desire 22 Pro

尺寸比较

166.3 mm 76.9 mm 9.4 mm 206 g165.88 mm 76.21 mm 7.98 mm 190 g165.5 mm 76 mm 8.3 mm 195 g160.5 mm 74.4 mm 7.9 mm 166 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Motorola Moto G72
  (Angelbird V60)
34.2 MB/s +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years)
29.3 MB/s +15%
Xiaomi Poco X5
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
27.13 MB/s +6%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
25.5 MB/s
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
24.6 MB/s -4%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
HTC Desire 22 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.1 (25.7-42.7)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (26.7-49.3)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37 (28.7-44.4)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø40 (29.3-50.7)
HTC Desire 22 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.5 (25.1-81.6)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.6 (29.3-82.6)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.6 (26.9-79.1)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.4 (32.4-80)

通信、软件和操作 - 不幸的是,几乎没有任何更新

很高兴看到HTC Desire 22 Pro配备了5G,然而,可能会有更多的频段支持,如LTE和其他现代手机标准。 在进行较长时间的海外旅行之前,这意味着用户必须检查是否可以在本地使用智能手机,以享受移动互联网接入。

HTC手机可能只有WiFi 5,但它有更多的天线用于发送和接收方向。它们使该设备发送和接收数据的速度是目前同类昂贵手机的两倍。传输速度也非常稳定。对于我们的测试,我们使用了华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000路由器。

在软件方面,尽管有Android 12,但你显然会想起早期的Android 版本,因为HTC没有将自己的系统信息或更新适应谷歌目前的Android 操作系统的外观。该制造商也没有透露会有多少系统更新,或者是否会有任何更新。然而,自2022年12月以来,该手机就没有再进行安全更新。

重点是应用,这些应用都是关于Metaverse主题和与HTC的Vive系列VR头盔之一的连接。HTC没有提到它优化了什么,预装的程序也可以通过使用其他手机在Google Play商店正常找到。Viveverse是一个Metaverse应用程序,用它可以在各个房间里漫游,由于缺乏参与的用户,感觉非常空虚。此外,它在Desire 22 Pro上也经常出现停顿。

120赫兹的触摸屏确保了流畅的滚动和灵敏的输入。在设备的右侧,一个指纹传感器被安置在待机按钮上。在手机(非常可靠地)解锁之前,大约需要一秒钟。也可以使用面部识别来解锁手机。这样做的效果同样好,但没有那么安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
HTC Desire 22 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
676 (629min - 713max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (183min - 386max) MBit/s -46%
Motorola Moto G72
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
359 (338min - 372max) MBit/s -47%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (269min - 374max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HTC Desire 22 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
628 (596min - 642max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
344 (173min - 351max) MBit/s -45%
Motorola Moto G72
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
333 (307min - 348max) MBit/s -47%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
330 (290min - 348max) MBit/s -47%
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680Tooltip
HTC Desire 22 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø627 (596-642)
HTC Desire 22 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø676 (629-713)

照相机 - 适用于适度的需求

前置摄像头图像
前置摄像头图像

6400万像素的主摄像头来自OmniVision,乍一看,它能拍出像样的照片,是该类设备的典型。然而,仔细观察,它们缺乏细节和对比度。对于简单的快照来说,它们当然是足够好的,如果有适度的要求,主要在手机的显示屏上观看,它们是令人满意的。

视频可以以1080p和30fps的速度录制。它们也有点缺乏细节,但在自适应亮度方面,视频记录击中了靶心。自动对焦也不会跳得太厉害。

还有一个直接的广角摄像头,没有捕捉到很多细节,也很难给图像增加任何活力。使用这个功能拍照也有点麻烦,因为它只能通过菜单访问。

在正面,有一个非常高的分辨率,3200万像素的自拍相机。然而,通常情况下,它只使用1/4的标称分辨率,以增加光输出。尽管光线很好,但前置摄像头在黑暗和明亮区域都缺乏活力。此外,照片也不能说是特别细致。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera LowLightWeitwinkel
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
9.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
ColorChecker HTC Desire 22 Pro: 7.95 ∆E min: 2.23 - max: 13.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
75.9 ∆E
44 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker HTC Desire 22 Pro: 46.78 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 92.92 ∆E

显示屏 - 在Desire 22 Pro的显示屏上找不到PWM。

子像素图像
子像素图像

HTC Desire 22 Pro的显示屏具有扩展的全高清分辨率,由于有Widevine L1认证,你甚至可以享受高清的流媒体内容。它的显示速度可达120帧/秒,这确保了运动的流畅再现。

到目前为止,一切听起来都很好,但不幸的是,IPS屏幕并不是特别明亮:在最大亮度下,我们测得的平均亮度为456cd/m²。OLED显示屏,在这个价格级别中不再是一个稀有的产品,可以管理相当高的数值。对比度是可以接受的,但屏幕上的颜色显得暗淡。主要是由于我们的光谱光度计在测试中发现了蓝色的色调。

但是,至少PWM是不存在的。

456
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 476 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 455.6 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 476 cd/m²
Contrast: 1442:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 8.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.238
HTC Desire 22 Pro
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6"
Motorola Moto G72
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco X5
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Response Times
92%
1%
93%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28.8 ?(14.8, 14)
1.5 ?(0.8, 0.7)
95%
26 ?(15, 11)
10%
1.51 ?(0.7165, 0.791)
95%
Response Time Black / White *
12.9 ?(8.8, 4.1)
1.5 ?(0.8, 0.7)
88%
14 ?(10, 4)
-9%
1.18 ?(0.5735, 0.6055)
91%
PWM Frequency
180
486
Screen
58%
24%
50%
Brightness middle
476
992
108%
672
41%
674
42%
Brightness
456
980
115%
656
44%
683
50%
Brightness Distribution
91
92
1%
90
-1%
98
8%
Black Level *
0.33
0.39
-18%
Contrast
1442
1723
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.26
4.56
27%
3.88
38%
1.6
74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.76
7.96
32%
7.89
33%
5.3
55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.5
3.1
64%
5.2
39%
2.5
71%
Gamma
2.238 98%
2.233 99%
2.218 99%
2.21 100%
CCT
8656 75%
7098 92%
7734 84%
6346 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
75% / 66%
13% / 20%
72% / 61%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.8 ms rise
↘ 4.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN 灰色鳞片
CalMAN 灰色鳞片
CalMAN 颜色精度
CalMAN 颜色精度
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 一款没有节流的快速手机

随着高通Snapdragon 695,HTC Desire 22 Pro在其最初的价位上有些动力不足,但是,定价在200到300美元之间,正好合适。有了这个处理器,该系统在很多情况下都能顺利运行,但当然,要想运行高要求的游戏或4K图形,还不够。

UFS-2.2内存是你对该类设备的期望,只有 摩托G72由于其更快的内存控制器,可以提供明显更高的数据吞吐量。

在较长时间的负载下,机箱的温度最高达到47.7℃。然而,在整个测试过程中,夏日的温度也是普遍的。尽管如此,3DMark压力测试显示,在多次运行和相同的基准测试后,性能几乎没有任何损失。

在过去,HTC制造的智能手机拥有市场上一些最好的扬声器,但HTC Desire 22 Pro在这方面并没有达到其祖先的要求:底部边缘的小扬声器听起来很闷,只能达到79分贝(A)的中等音量。最重要的蓝牙音频编解码器都是可用的,甚至包括aptX TWS+这样的现代变体。另外,可以通过3.5毫米音频插孔连接有线耳机。无论哪种方式,都听起来不错。

由于手机重量较大,HTC Desire 22 Pro的电池似乎比其他智能手机要小:然而,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,它的电池容量为4520毫安时,可以使用15小时3分钟。只要你不对你的手机要求太多,这绝对应该让你度过一天。在最大18瓦时,通过电缆进行充电,但不包括充电器。同样,最高15瓦的无线充电也是可能的,以及来自其他设备的最高5瓦的无线反向充电。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)
989 Points +47%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
678 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=24)
676 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
674 Points 0%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
671 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
540 Points -20%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)
3298 Points +73%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1963 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1925 Points +1%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1907 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=24)
1904 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1810 Points -5%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=159, last 2 years)
1439 Points +57%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
918 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (893 - 919, n=8)
906 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
893 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=159, last 2 years)
4010 Points +83%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2189 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1993 - 2189, n=8)
2073 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2064 Points -6%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)
12941 Points +21%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
10675 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10634 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
10589 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
10055 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 11732, n=23)
9629 Points -10%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)
3077 Points +5%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2944 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2827 - 2983, n=19)
2930 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2924 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2600 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)
3252 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2822 Points 0%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2819 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2733 - 2845, n=19)
2813 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2433 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3482 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3425 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3093 - 3554, n=19)
3407 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3346 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)
3288 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7682 Points +148%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3103 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3069 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2887 - 3107, n=21)
3069 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2648 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11410 Points +281%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2997 Points
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2988 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2812 - 3008, n=21)
2974 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2459 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4587 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3622 Points +2%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3539 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3182 - 3613, n=21)
3465 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3392 Points -4%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2822 Points +134%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1216 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1197 - 1292, n=22)
1212 Points 0%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1207 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1183 Points -2%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7517 Points +523%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1232 Points +2%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1207 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1207 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1193 - 1227, n=22)
1204 Points 0%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=187, last 2 years)
2043 Points +466%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
361 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
360 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (355 - 364, n=22)
360 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
347 Points -4%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=185, last 2 years)
2040 Points +475%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
355 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
354 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (351 - 371, n=22)
354 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
337 Points -5%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps +159%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (18 - 38, n=23)
19.7 fps +4%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
19 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
19 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps -26%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
79.4 fps +278%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (21 - 23, n=23)
21.5 fps +2%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
21 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
21 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
16 fps -24%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.1 fps +209%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (11 - 24, n=23)
12.4 fps +3%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
12 fps
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
12 fps 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
12 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.9 fps -26%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
31.6 fps +305%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (7.7 - 8.2, n=23)
7.99 fps +2%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7.8 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7.8 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.9 fps -24%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 46, n=202, last 2 years)
14.9 fps +326%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4 fps +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3.5 - 4, n=21)
3.6 fps +3%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3.5 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3.5 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2.5 fps -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
36733 Points +64%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
24196 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (17849 - 31647, n=21)
24051 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22881 Points +2%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
22407 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
18237 Points -19%
HTC Desire 22 ProMotorola Moto G72OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5GXiaomi Poco X5Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
33%
-9%
1%
16%
146%
Sequential Read 256KB
527.1
868.5
65%
506.1
-4%
522.64
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
468.5
497.5
6%
466.6
0%
497.38
6%
Random Read 4KB
186.9
231.4
24%
162.5
-13%
185.09
-1%
Random Write 4KB
168.6
230.2
37%
134.9
-20%
168.49
0%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
10%

温度

Max. Load
 47 °C39.2 °C37.4 °C 
 47.7 °C39.4 °C39.5 °C 
 47.5 °C36.3 °C39.8 °C 
Maximum: 47.7 °C
Average: 41.5 °C
35.8 °C38.4 °C43 °C
37.1 °C38.8 °C43.9 °C
35.8 °C40 °C45.3 °C
Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 39.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 25.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热图前沿
热图前沿
热图后部
热图后部
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G72
99.4 (2.08min - 2.09max) % +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
99.2 (2.16min - 2.18max) % +1%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
98.7 (2.14min - 2.17max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
HTC Desire 22 Pro
99.7 (7.22min - 7.24max) %
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
99.7 (7.24min - 7.27max) % 0%
Motorola Moto G72
97.1 (6.59min - 6.79max) % -3%

Legend

 
HTC Desire 22 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204344.82535.438.53132.529.1403535.4503836.86328.526.68021.121.71002124.112520.926.416019.736.920014.741.825013.647.931511.952.240012.657.850014.461.663014.561.680015.658.6100012.569125012.873.1160011.172.3200011.969.7250011.960.9315013.160.6400014.457500015.965.3630015.960.8800016.360.1100001754.4125001748.31600017.651.6SPL26.579N0.838.8median 14.5median 58.6Delta2.27.729.642.93043.824.537.725.840.837.543.325.240.320.247.520.445.917.547.814.450.814.351.215.251.811.956.913.561.612.166.112.466.311.77111.876.611.478.112.377.112.279.312.180.612.283.912.985.713.48413.282.512.979.613.678.913.476.913.265.324.8930.691.7median 12.9median 76.90.99.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHTC Desire 22 ProXiaomi Poco X5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HTC Desire 22 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco X5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
986 min +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years)
982 min +9%
Motorola Moto G72
5000 mAh
929 min +3%
HTC Desire 22 Pro
4520 mAh
903 min
Xiaomi Poco X5
5000 mAh
662 min -27%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 03min

Pros

+ 快速Wi-Fi 5
+ 无线充电
+ IP67认证
+ 性能良好,无节流现象
+ 无PWM

Cons

- 盒子里没有充电器
- 几乎没有任何新的软件更新
- 非常重
- 屏幕与身体的比例一般

评价--比起未来主义,复古得更漂亮

HTC Desire 22 Pro评测:评测设备由:
HTC Desire 22 Pro评测:评测设备由:
cyberport.de

在某些方面,HTC Desire 22 Pro有点老式:有点过厚的边框和软件外观--这让我们想起了Android 5或6--带我们回到了HTC的最佳时代。这个时代已经过去了很久。但这不应该是所有的坏事:任何对智能手机中的通知LED和调频收音机心存感激的人都会得到他们的金钱回报。然而,这款手机的重量很重,再加上容量很低的电池是令人讨厌的。

尽管如此,120赫兹屏幕、无线充电和5G等现代功能都可以在这里找到,还有快速的Wi-Fi,以及快速的处理器IP认证。宏达电没有在包装盒中以一次性巨大的零售价提供充电器,这并不慷慨。

HTC Desire 22 Pro很难履行其作为Metaverse和加密手机的承诺,但仍能以其可承受的价格、快速的互联网和复古的功能找到其粉丝。

尽管如此,当涉及到软件时,我们建议不要指望制造商的广告承诺:到目前为止,在2023年对软件更新的搜索已经徒劳无功,承诺的Metaverse加密功能只是变成了简单的应用程序,也可以在其他智能手机上使用。

随着摩托罗拉Moto G72你可以得到一个非常明亮的OLED屏幕,但必须处理受损的处理器性能。这款手机小米Poco X5速度更快,也有一个OLED屏幕,而且盒子里还有一个33瓦的充电器。

价格和可用性

目前,国际版的HTC Desire 22 Pro可以在亚马逊上以312美元购买。 在亚马逊上以312美元的价格购买.

HTC Desire 22 Pro - 07/02/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 75%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
30 / 64 → 47%
Application Performance
73 / 86 → 85%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 90 → 60%
Camera
51%
Average
73%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > HTC Desire 22 Pro 5G智能手机评测--快速的互联网现在有了一个可接受的价格
Florian Schmitt, 2023-07- 4 (Update: 2023-07- 4)