HTC Desire 22 Pro 5G智能手机评测--快速的互联网现在有了一个可接受的价格
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78.2 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | HTC Desire 22 Pro SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 206 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2412x1080 | |
81.9 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Motorola Moto G72 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 166 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
81.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.72" | 2400x1080 | |
81.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Xiaomi Poco X5 SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 闪亮的背面和IP认证
Metaverse听起来像是一个逃离现实的好地方。在这个地方,你不仅可以创造自己的化身,还可以创造世界本身,并根据你的想象力为两者量身定做。然而,这一趋势还没有真正掀起。通过Desire 22 Pro,宏达电提供了一款特殊的中档手机,在一些国家甚至还用NFT或加密货币等其他时髦的流行语来宣传。
乍一看,这款手机从外观上看很正常。制造商采用了玫瑰金和黑色的时尚组合,其中一种颜色占主导地位,这取决于不同的变体。后面是闪亮的,有一个波浪图案。不幸的是,该设备非常善于吸引指纹和其他肮脏的污点。
角落很圆润,Desire 22 Pro的手感很好,但是,206克的重量,是一个相对较重的设备。显示屏边框也有点厚,这意味着手机正面只有81%的面积是真正的屏幕。
我们对HTC Desire 22 Pro的IP67认证印象深刻,它至少应该允许在水中短暂浸泡,而且外壳承诺可以完全防止灰尘。
有了慷慨的8GB内存和128GB UFS 2.2闪存,Desire 22 Pro在内存方面有很好的保障。此外,一些老的优点,如通知LED和调频收音机,在其他手机上是很难得到的。同样,该设备还配备了用于移动支付的NFC。
如果需要,内存可以通过microSD读卡器进行扩展。在使用我们的microSD Angelbird V60参考卡的测试中,它取得了一流的成绩。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Motorola Moto G72 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
HTC Desire 22 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 不幸的是,几乎没有任何更新
很高兴看到HTC Desire 22 Pro配备了5G,然而,可能会有更多的频段支持,如LTE和其他现代手机标准。 在进行较长时间的海外旅行之前,这意味着用户必须检查是否可以在本地使用智能手机,以享受移动互联网接入。
HTC手机可能只有WiFi 5,但它有更多的天线用于发送和接收方向。它们使该设备发送和接收数据的速度是目前同类昂贵手机的两倍。传输速度也非常稳定。对于我们的测试,我们使用了华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000路由器。
在软件方面,尽管有Android 12,但你显然会想起早期的Android 版本,因为HTC没有将自己的系统信息或更新适应谷歌目前的Android 操作系统的外观。该制造商也没有透露会有多少系统更新,或者是否会有任何更新。然而,自2022年12月以来,该手机就没有再进行安全更新。
重点是应用,这些应用都是关于Metaverse主题和与HTC的Vive系列VR头盔之一的连接。HTC没有提到它优化了什么,预装的程序也可以通过使用其他手机在Google Play商店正常找到。Viveverse是一个Metaverse应用程序,用它可以在各个房间里漫游,由于缺乏参与的用户,感觉非常空虚。此外,它在Desire 22 Pro上也经常出现停顿。
120赫兹的触摸屏确保了流畅的滚动和灵敏的输入。在设备的右侧,一个指纹传感器被安置在待机按钮上。在手机(非常可靠地)解锁之前,大约需要一秒钟。也可以使用面部识别来解锁手机。这样做的效果同样好,但没有那么安全。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
HTC Desire 22 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 | |
Motorola Moto G72 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HTC Desire 22 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 | |
Motorola Moto G72 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G |
照相机 - 适用于适度的需求
6400万像素的主摄像头来自OmniVision,乍一看,它能拍出像样的照片,是该类设备的典型。然而,仔细观察,它们缺乏细节和对比度。对于简单的快照来说,它们当然是足够好的,如果有适度的要求,主要在手机的显示屏上观看,它们是令人满意的。
视频可以以1080p和30fps的速度录制。它们也有点缺乏细节,但在自适应亮度方面,视频记录击中了靶心。自动对焦也不会跳得太厉害。
还有一个直接的广角摄像头,没有捕捉到很多细节,也很难给图像增加任何活力。使用这个功能拍照也有点麻烦,因为它只能通过菜单访问。
在正面,有一个非常高的分辨率,3200万像素的自拍相机。然而,通常情况下,它只使用1/4的标称分辨率,以增加光输出。尽管光线很好,但前置摄像头在黑暗和明亮区域都缺乏活力。此外,照片也不能说是特别细致。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera LowLightWeitwinkel显示屏 - 在Desire 22 Pro的显示屏上找不到PWM。
HTC Desire 22 Pro的显示屏具有扩展的全高清分辨率,由于有Widevine L1认证,你甚至可以享受高清的流媒体内容。它的显示速度可达120帧/秒,这确保了运动的流畅再现。
到目前为止,一切听起来都很好,但不幸的是,IPS屏幕并不是特别明亮:在最大亮度下,我们测得的平均亮度为456cd/m²。OLED显示屏,在这个价格级别中不再是一个稀有的产品,可以管理相当高的数值。对比度是可以接受的,但屏幕上的颜色显得暗淡。主要是由于我们的光谱光度计在测试中发现了蓝色的色调。
但是,至少PWM是不存在的。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 476 cd/m²
Contrast: 1442:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 8.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.238
HTC Desire 22 Pro IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6" | Motorola Moto G72 P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco X5 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 92% | 1% | 93% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.8 ? | 1.5 ? 95% | 26 ? 10% | 1.51 ? 95% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.9 ? | 1.5 ? 88% | 14 ? -9% | 1.18 ? 91% |
PWM Frequency | 180 | 486 | ||
Screen | 58% | 24% | 50% | |
Brightness middle | 476 | 992 108% | 672 41% | 674 42% |
Brightness | 456 | 980 115% | 656 44% | 683 50% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 90 -1% | 98 8% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.39 -18% | ||
Contrast | 1442 | 1723 19% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.26 | 4.56 27% | 3.88 38% | 1.6 74% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.76 | 7.96 32% | 7.89 33% | 5.3 55% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.5 | 3.1 64% | 5.2 39% | 2.5 71% |
Gamma | 2.238 98% | 2.233 99% | 2.218 99% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 8656 75% | 7098 92% | 7734 84% | 6346 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 75% /
66% | 13% /
20% | 72% /
61% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise | |
↘ 4.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 一款没有节流的快速手机
随着高通Snapdragon 695,HTC Desire 22 Pro在其最初的价位上有些动力不足,但是,定价在200到300美元之间,正好合适。有了这个处理器,该系统在很多情况下都能顺利运行,但当然,要想运行高要求的游戏或4K图形,还不够。
UFS-2.2内存是你对该类设备的期望,只有 摩托G72由于其更快的内存控制器,可以提供明显更高的数据吞吐量。
在较长时间的负载下,机箱的温度最高达到47.7℃。然而,在整个测试过程中,夏日的温度也是普遍的。尽管如此,3DMark压力测试显示,在多次运行和相同的基准测试后,性能几乎没有任何损失。
在过去,HTC制造的智能手机拥有市场上一些最好的扬声器,但HTC Desire 22 Pro在这方面并没有达到其祖先的要求:底部边缘的小扬声器听起来很闷,只能达到79分贝(A)的中等音量。最重要的蓝牙音频编解码器都是可用的,甚至包括aptX TWS+这样的现代变体。另外,可以通过3.5毫米音频插孔连接有线耳机。无论哪种方式,都听起来不错。
由于手机重量较大,HTC Desire 22 Pro的电池似乎比其他智能手机要小:然而,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,它的电池容量为4520毫安时,可以使用15小时3分钟。只要你不对你的手机要求太多,这绝对应该让你度过一天。在最大18瓦时,通过电缆进行充电,但不包括充电器。同样,最高15瓦的无线充电也是可能的,以及来自其他设备的最高5瓦的无线反向充电。
HTC Desire 22 Pro | Motorola Moto G72 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | Xiaomi Poco X5 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 33% | -9% | 1% | 16% | 146% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 527.1 | 868.5 65% | 506.1 -4% | 522.64 -1% | 728 ? 38% | 1834 ? 248% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 468.5 | 497.5 6% | 466.6 0% | 497.38 6% | 527 ? 12% | 1426 ? 204% |
Random Read 4KB | 186.9 | 231.4 24% | 162.5 -13% | 185.09 -1% | 191.7 ? 3% | 278 ? 49% |
Random Write 4KB | 168.6 | 230.2 37% | 134.9 -20% | 168.49 0% | 185.8 ? 10% | 310 ? 84% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Motorola Moto G72 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | |
HTC Desire 22 Pro | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
HTC Desire 22 Pro | |
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | |
Motorola Moto G72 |
发言人
HTC Desire 22 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco X5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G72 | |
HTC Desire 22 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco X5 |
Pros
Cons
评价--比起未来主义,复古得更漂亮
在某些方面,HTC Desire 22 Pro有点老式:有点过厚的边框和软件外观--这让我们想起了Android 5或6--带我们回到了HTC的最佳时代。这个时代已经过去了很久。但这不应该是所有的坏事:任何对智能手机中的通知LED和调频收音机心存感激的人都会得到他们的金钱回报。然而,这款手机的重量很重,再加上容量很低的电池是令人讨厌的。
尽管如此,120赫兹屏幕、无线充电和5G等现代功能都可以在这里找到,还有快速的Wi-Fi,以及快速的处理器IP认证。宏达电没有在包装盒中以一次性巨大的零售价提供充电器,这并不慷慨。
HTC Desire 22 Pro很难履行其作为Metaverse和加密手机的承诺,但仍能以其可承受的价格、快速的互联网和复古的功能找到其粉丝。
尽管如此,当涉及到软件时,我们建议不要指望制造商的广告承诺:到目前为止,在2023年对软件更新的搜索已经徒劳无功,承诺的Metaverse加密功能只是变成了简单的应用程序,也可以在其他智能手机上使用。
随着摩托罗拉Moto G72你可以得到一个非常明亮的OLED屏幕,但必须处理受损的处理器性能。这款手机小米Poco X5速度更快,也有一个OLED屏幕,而且盒子里还有一个33瓦的充电器。
价格和可用性
目前,国际版的HTC Desire 22 Pro可以在亚马逊上以312美元购买。 在亚马逊上以312美元的价格购买.
HTC Desire 22 Pro
-
07/02/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.