摩托罗拉Moto G72智能手机评测--OLED具有一流的亮度，但没有5G

Name: Motorola Moto G72
Brand: Motorola

强大的图像。

摩托罗拉Moto G72拥有10800万像素的摄像头和非常明亮的OLED屏幕，它的目标是在中低端市场大放异彩。但是，没有5G移动通信的事实是否会使Moto G72在我们的测试中失败？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/05/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

在这一点上，摩托罗拉在中端为每个客户提供了合适的设备：有OLED屏幕或IPS，有或没有5G，有高分辨率的摄像头或快速WLAN。然而，我们没有再看到统一的设计语言。

现在，Moto G72也被加入到众多机型中。280欧元（约合295美元），它是该系列中更昂贵的智能手机之一，其设计遵循了更高质量的Edge系列。凭借其108万像素的摄像头和P-OLED屏幕，它看起来是该价位段其他智能手机的一个非常有趣的替代品。

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto G72 (Moto G Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.60 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, HDR, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 108 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 160.5 x 74.4

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30 Watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/1.7, phase comparison AF, LED flash, Videos @1080p/60fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.45, videos @1080p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP52 certified; SAR: 0.95 W/kg (head), 1.69 W/kg (body), fanless

Weight

166 g

Price

280 Euro

Links

Motorola homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
81.9 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Motorola Moto G72 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	166 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
78.9 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Xiaomi Poco M5 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	201 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.58"	2408x1080
80.3 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy A23 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	197 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2408x1080
80.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.59"	2412x1080
80.8 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Motorola Moto G42 SD 680, Adreno 610	175 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
80.2 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Realme 9 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	191 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2412x1080

外壳--Moto智能手机很薄很轻

特别是它的方形摄像头模块，摩托罗拉Moto G72使用了与其他Moto G设备不同的设计语言，让人更多地想起价格明显更高的 Edge 30 Fusion.然而，这只适用于设计，因为Moto G72放弃了高质量的材料，只提供简单的塑料。

另一方面，Moto G72只有166克（约5.86盎司），是一款非常轻的智能手机，不到8毫米的机身也比这个价位的对比设备略显纤薄。摩托罗拉在稳定性和做工方面做得不错。外壳只能稍微压一下，各部分都很干净，几乎没有明显的过渡。

还有一个IP认证，但只是根据IP52，这相当于对灰尘的体面保护。在防水方面，溅水是可以的，但你应该避免将其浸入水中。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Xiaomi Poco M5 OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Realme 9 5G Motorola Moto G42 Motorola Moto G72 DIN A6 ❌

设备 - 为谷歌支付做好准备

摩托罗拉Moto G72包括128GB的存储空间，买家可以选择6或8GB的内存。

摩托G72提供一个3.5毫米音频端口和一个USB-C端口，用于充电和数据传输。然而，它只在内部以USB-2.0的速度连接，所以数据传输可能需要更长的时间。

这款中档智能手机还带来了NFC，让你可以使用移动支付服务。

微型SD卡读卡器

microSD读卡器占据了两个SIM卡插槽中的一个。我们的Angelbird V60参考卡在复制测试中达到了相当好的速度，而在CPDT基准测试中，读卡器的表现达到了同类水平，但只是有一些明显的变化。

总的来说，你可以指望从卡上和卡下的数据传输比这个价格级别的通常情况下要快一点。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	45.7 MB/s +34%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	34.2 MB/s
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	28.9 MB/s -15%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	28.2 MB/s -18%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	26.3 MB/s -23%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	24.6 MB/s -28%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (26.7-49.3)

Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.7 (21.8-45.3)

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø41.4 (29.9-52.3)

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.2 (29.8-46.8)

Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø32.1 (23.8-43.1)

Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.1 (26.6-49.6)

Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.6 (29.3-82.6)

Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (40-79.1)

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.9 (67.1-81.5)

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (42.7-84.9)

Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.4 (30-87.4)

Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.6 (34.7-88)

软件--相当纯粹Android

摩托罗拉的智能手机分支曾经被谷歌收购，虽然此时的智能手机制造商属于联想，但在智能手机上保持纯正的Android ，这一传统一直被保持。在摩托罗拉Moto G72上也是如此，即使有不同的系统字体和符号皮肤。幸运的是，制造商也没有安装任何第三方应用程序。

Android 12安装在智能手机上，安全补丁是从2022年10月开始的，这使得它们在本次测试时仍然是相当有效的。制造商承诺每两个月更新一次，直到2025年10月，而且这款手机也被确认会收到 13。Android

通信和GNSS - 没有快速的移动互联网

虽然这个价格段的许多智能手机都可以用5G来得分，但在摩托罗拉Moto G72中，你必须满足于LTE作为最快的移动通信标准。此外，这款智能手机也不是一款世界性的手机，它的通信频率对所有国家都足够了。但对于欧洲中部来说应该是足够的。

在用我们的华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000参考路由器进行的WLAN测试中，这款智能手机为其价格级别提供了良好的传输速率。与大多数同价位的智能手机一样，WiFi 5是支持的最快标准，传输速度在307至372 Mbit/s之间，Moto G72在我们的测试中表现得令人信服。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=188, last 2 years)	719 MBit/s +116%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	356 (333^min - 363^max) MBit/s +7%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	352 (339^min - 360^max) MBit/s +6%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	341 (330^min - 352^max) MBit/s +2%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	333 (307^min - 348^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	330 (304^min - 343^max) MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	234 (203^min - 256^max) MBit/s -30%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=190, last 2 years)	736 MBit/s +105%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	370 (332^min - 381^max) MBit/s +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	363 (354^min - 376^max) MBit/s +1%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	362 (329^min - 376^max) MBit/s +1%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	359 (338^min - 372^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	358 (334^min - 374^max) MBit/s 0%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	305 (269^min - 336^max) MBit/s -15%

Motorola Moto G72; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (307-348)

Motorola Moto G72; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (338-372)

在户外，该智能手机能够快速定位，精确度高达2米（约6.6英尺）。虽然找到的卫星数量略低，但它使用了SBAS支持系统，使定位更加准确。

在我们的实际测试中，我们带着摩托罗拉Moto G72进行了一次自行车之旅，并确定该智能手机总体上能够很好地跟踪我们的路线。然而，定位并不总是完美的，经常会偏离我们的实际路线，或者在没有任何弯路的地方增加一些弯路。

虽然你可以使用Moto G72进行整体导航，但你应该只在不需要绝对准确的时候使用它。

电话功能和语音质量 - 使用听筒更好

Android 老手们应该对手机应用很熟悉，因为它是谷歌的原始应用。但如果有必要，你也可以安装另一个电话应用。

我们在几次通话中测试了语音质量，也请我们的对话伙伴来判断音质。你基本上听不到任何其他恼人的噪音，听筒能够变得相当响亮，即使在嘈杂的环境中也能清楚地听到你的对话伙伴。我们自己的声音也传递得相当清楚。

使用扬声器模式，对话听起来不那么存在，强调了高频。我们的对话伙伴也证实，我们的声音在扬声器模式下听起来不太清晰。

照相机 - 高分辨率和其他什么？

摩托罗拉在其智能手机中使用了三星的108万像素相机传感器，即Isocell HM6。这将9个像素组合成一个更大的图像点，从而产生具有高感光度的1200万像素图像。然而，在特定模式下，你也可以选择使用全分辨率。

虽然图像清晰度和细节程度处于一个体面的水平，但它们无法跟上高端相机的步伐。在不太完美的光线条件下，照明效果也变得相当弱。图像的色彩再现通常显得略微冷淡。然而，与价格相近的智能手机的相机相比，至少有稍微可见的细节。

在光线很弱、对比度很高的情况下，它成功地获得了非常好的烛光再现，但另一方面，许多地区仍然完全黑暗，没有任何细节。

该广角镜头的分辨率为800万像素。它的图像处于平均水平，有一些细节，只有有限的失真。两个镜头之间的混合变焦是可能的，主摄像头也有8倍数码变焦。

主摄像头录制视频的最大分辨率为1080p和60 fps。你也可以使用广角或微距镜头来录制视频，但这时你需要决定使用其中一个镜头，而且在录制过程中不能切换。亮度调节略微太慢，在完成视频录制后变得很明显。自动对焦在大多数情况下工作得相当快，但在找到正确的清晰度调整之前，它也会不时地进进出出。

前面有一个1600万像素的摄像头。虽然它拍出的照片相当清晰，但在黑暗区域仍能提供更多细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Blume Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light Weitwinkelkamera

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在我们的演播室里，主摄像头产生的图像对比度相当丰富，即使是深色背景上的深色文字也能显示出来。然而，向边缘的锐度明显降低。

在只有1勒克斯的照度下，物体仍能隐约可见。

ColorChecker Motorola Moto G72: 6.75 ∆E min: 3.54 - max: 8.83 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括大量的附件

Moto G72包括一个充电器、USB线、SIM卡工具和硅胶保险套。摩托罗拉已经有一段时间没有在其网站上为新的智能手机提供任何特殊配件了。

该制造商为其智能手机提供24个月的保修。

输入设备和操作 - 快速指纹识别器

120赫兹的显示屏提高了系统的反应速度，使通过触摸屏进行的操作感觉非常直接。右侧的硬件按键很容易被感觉到，并能产生清晰的反馈。

在显示屏下方有一个指纹传感器，相当接近机箱的底部边缘。它能非常可靠地识别存储的指纹，解锁手机时只需短暂的延迟。你也可以通过面部识别来解锁，但这是一个纯软件解决方案，并不被认为非常安全。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 几乎没有任何其他智能手机的显示屏是如此明亮的

制造商在Moto G72的OLED屏幕上取得了一个真正的政变。这块具有扩展的全高清分辨率的显示屏具有HDR功能，并且在整个屏幕的全白背景下达到最高亮度。即使是明显更昂贵的智能手机也无法做到这一点。

摩托罗拉Moto G72的平均亮度为980 cd/m²，其最高亮度明显高于所有同价位的对比设备。

此外，亮度分布相当均匀，由于采用了OLED技术，黑色值非常完美，理论上可以实现无限高的对比度，并在实践中带来鲜艳的色彩。


938 cd/m²	990 cd/m²	1016 cd/m²
935 cd/m²	992 cd/m²	1019 cd/m²
946 cd/m²	974 cd/m²	1013 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 1019 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 980.3 cd/m² Minimum: 6.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 992 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
145.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.233

	Motorola Moto G72 P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Xiaomi Poco M5 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"	Samsung Galaxy A23 5G PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"	OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6"	Motorola Moto G42 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Realme 9 5G IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6"
Screen		13%	-50%	-43%	28%	-29%
Brightness middle	992	400 -60%	447 -55%	590 -41%	691 -30%	589 -41%
Brightness	980	396 -60%	428 -56%	561 -43%	699 -29%	561 -43%
Brightness Distribution	92	96 4%	86 -7%	92 0%	95 3%	90 -2%
Black Level *		0.27	0.31	0.38		0.5
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.56	1.26 72%	5.54 -21%	5.15 -13%	1.02 78%	4.33 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.96	2.45 69%	10.04 -26%	10.35 -30%	1.73 78%	8.39 -5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.1	1.5 52%	7.3 -135%	7.1 -129%	1 68%	5.9 -90%
Gamma	2.233 ^99%	2.298 ^96%	2.03 ^108%	2.143 ^103%	2.205 ^100%	2.063 ^107%
CCT	7098 ^92%	6658 ^98%	8853 ^73%	8540 ^76%	6621 ^98%	8021 ^81%
Contrast		1481	1442	1553		1178

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

180 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 180 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 180 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和各种亮度设置下的测量系列

在最低亮度下，显示屏显示180赫兹的PWM闪烁，即使你在设置中激活了 "防止闪烁"。因此，那些对屏幕闪烁敏感的人应该在购买前试一试，以确定他们是否能接受该显示屏。

摩托G72的色彩还原度很好，只有在灰度的明亮色调中出现非常轻微的蓝色色调。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8 ms rise
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8 ms rise
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于其良好的顶部亮度，你也可以在户外明亮的秋季阳光下使用该智能手机。

我们还喜欢稳定的视角，它允许你在非常陡峭的视角下仍能识别显示内容。

表现 - 大约在班级水平上

联发科只推出了 Helio G99在2022年8月才推出，而几个月后就可以在Moto G72中找到它的SoC。该芯片采用6纳米工艺生产，无法完全跟上高通骁龙695尽管具有相同的时钟速度，但它无法完全跟上高通骁龙695，后者被用于这个价格级别的许多其他智能手机。

然而，这些差异大多不是很大，在日常操作中你应该不会注意到太大的差异。Moto G72的工作大多没有停顿，处理要求较高的应用程序也没有任何问题。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)	1012 Points +87%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	692 Points +28%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	687 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	680 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	548 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (490 - 576, n=17)	547 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	540 Points
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	376 Points -30%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)	3370 Points +86%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1998 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1997 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1924 Points +6%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1914 Points +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1670 - 1981, n=17)	1828 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1810 Points
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1583 Points -13%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)	810387 Points +143%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	399726 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	344344 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	337968 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	334060 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (229468 - 375956, n=8)	317183 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	238371 Points -29%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 26863, n=192, last 2 years)	13052 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	10589 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (8885 - 11379, n=17)	9894 Points -7%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	9776 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	9742 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	9587 Points -9%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	9363 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	6176 Points -42%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)	894 Points +49%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	602 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	602 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	593 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (526 - 602, n=10)	565 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	521 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	325 Points -46%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)	6363 Points +108%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3596 Points +18%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3535 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3171 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	3054 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3050 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2855 - 3120, n=10)	3006 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2564 Points -16%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10203 Points +57%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7976 Points +23%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	6969 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	6789 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6637 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	6484 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5261 - 6776, n=10)	6230 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5852 Points -10%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6843 Points +72%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4366 Points +10%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4311 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	3982 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3802 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3454 - 4152, n=10)	3764 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3669 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	3167 Points -20%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	17343 Points +535%
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4413 Points +62%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4323 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	4166 Points +53%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2683 - 3002, n=10)	2799 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2744 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	2730 Points
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2181 Points -20%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1569 Points +27%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1150 - 1325, n=10)	1252 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1250 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1234 Points
Realme 9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1163 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096	1128 Points -9%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1125 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	923 Points -25%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years)	17392 Points +79%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	9695 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	9493 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=9)	8584 Points -11%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)	25706 Points +2734%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (877 - 982, n=8)	908 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	907 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	890 Points -2%

图形性能也略低于搭载骁龙695.一般来说，它应该很难满足60帧游戏的需要，但我们将在 "游戏 "部分仔细研究。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	352 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	351 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	351 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	337 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	323 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	360 Points +4%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	356 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	355 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	347 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	342 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	125 Points -64%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1232 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1201 Points -3%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1197 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1196 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1155 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	443 Points -64%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1205 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1198 Points +1%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1197 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1183 Points
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	445 Points -62%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2883 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2865 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2838 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2837 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2822 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2476 Points -13%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2749 Points +15%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2710 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2655 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2393 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2378 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1121 Points -53%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2778 Points +12%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2734 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2699 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2479 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2467 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1276 Points -49%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3727 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3622 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3561 Points -2%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3462 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3383 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2814 Points -22%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3008 Points +22%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2973 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2899 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2459 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2413 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1191 Points -52%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3098 Points +17%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3086 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2994 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2648 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2618 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1366 Points -48%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2949 Points +13%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2917 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2856 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2600 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2535 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1339 Points -48%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2831 Points +16%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2809 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2733 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2433 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2356 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1170 Points -52%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3455 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3450 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3425 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3393 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3370 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2707 Points -21%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	81 fps +50%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps +11%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	54 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	54 fps
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -35%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	91 fps +42%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps +14%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -44%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	46 fps +15%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -45%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps +32%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps +36%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps +36%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -40%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps +33%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.4 fps -38%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +27%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +27%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.3 fps -45%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +35%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +35%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.8 fps -1%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5 fps -44%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.1 fps +37%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.8 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.7 fps +31%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.8 fps -2%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -46%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +36%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps +29%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.5 fps -39%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps +38%
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +31%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.7 fps -39%

在冲浪时，我们的测试装置有一个平均速度。页面的渲染速度相当快，但在滚动时，你可能需要不时地等待图片的加载。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)	121.7 Points +104%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)	67.19 Points +12%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=9)	66.5 Points +11%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	64.165 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)	59.8 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)	46.877 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	41.845 Points -30%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)	139.5 runs/min +243%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 80.7, n=9)	52.5 runs/min +29%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	47.11 runs/min +16%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chome 107)	40.69 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chome 106)	40.6 runs/min 0%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	37.8 runs/min -7%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chome 107)	24.09 runs/min -41%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)	114.5 Points +97%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=9)	69.6 Points +20%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	64 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)	60 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)	58 Points
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	43 Points -26%
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)	39 Points -33%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +62%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	96 Points +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=8)	95.4 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)	92 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)	88 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)	87 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	59 Points -36%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)	37643 Points +106%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	22285 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=17)	20999 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)	20787 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)	18237 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)	17228 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	12364 Points -32%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	3341.4 ms * -50%
Motorola Moto G72 (Chrome 107)	2227.3 ms *
Xiaomi Poco M5 (Chrome 107)	2213.3 ms * +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=9)	2058 ms * +8%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)	1948.1 ms * +13%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	1922.7 ms * +14%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * +30%

* ... smaller is better

摩托罗拉使用UFS 2.2存储，有一个好的控制器，也能充分利用模块。即使是小米Poco M5在写入速度方面做得更好，所有的加载时间和复制过程都相当快。

	Motorola Moto G72	Xiaomi Poco M5	Samsung Galaxy A23 5G	OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G	Motorola Moto G42	Realme 9 5G	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		27%	-24%	-26%	-20%	-60%	-12%	90%
Sequential Read 256KB	868.5	976.4 12%	485.1 -44%	509.21 -41%	843.09 -3%	511 -41%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -16%	1863 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years) 115%
Sequential Write 256KB	497.5	870.7 75%	487.4 -2%	482.15 -3%	436.32 -12%	120.6 -76%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) 6%	1446 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=194, last 2 years) 191%
Random Read 4KB	231.4	247.6 7%	188.2 -19%	179.02 -23%	122.08 -47%	88.5 -62%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) -17%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=194, last 2 years) 20%
Random Write 4KB	230.2	257.8 12%	163.1 -29%	147.46 -36%	186.23 -19%	95.4 -59%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) -19%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=194, last 2 years) 34%

游戏 - 60帧仍然是一个梦想

虽然你也可以在Moto G72上玩游戏，但遗憾的是，它不足以满足所有游戏的最高细节要求。

在《暗黑破坏神》中，最大可能是30帧，而在《PUBG Mobile》中，在低设置下至少是近40帧。如果你降低一点要求，几乎所有的游戏都能运行。我们用GameBench的软件来确定帧率。.

通过触摸屏和位置传感器进行的控制也是完美无缺的。

Motorola Moto G72; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.3.0: Ø39.5 (37-41)

Motorola Moto G72; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.3.0: Ø29.2 (25-31)

Motorola Moto G72; Diablo Immortal; 1.6.2: Ø29.5 (24-31)

排放 - 几乎没有变暖

温度

Moto G72的发热量保持在限制范围内，即使在较长的负载下，我们测量的最高温度为36.5°C（97.7°F）。

即使在较长的负载下，SoC几乎没有节流，为持续运行提供了最佳条件。

Max. Load

Idle


36.5 °C	32.7 °C	30.3 °C
35.9 °C	33.5 °C	30.3 °C
35.9 °C	33.2 °C	30.7 °C

Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 33.2 °C


28 °C	31.8 °C	35.4 °C
28.9 °C	32.2 °C	35.3 °C
29.1 °C	32.4 °C	36.3 °C

Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 32.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.7 % +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % +3%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % +2%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.7 % +2%
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	97.1 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 %
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.6 % -1%
Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	97.8 % -2%
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	97.3 % -2%

Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.08 (2.08-2.09)

Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.02-2.07)

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.14 (2.13-2.16)

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)

Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.733 (0.725-0.746)

Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.67 (6.59-6.79)

Xiaomi Poco M5 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.44 (7.37-7.47)

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22)

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.21 (7.21-7.23)

Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.67 (2.66-2.68)

发言人

尽管Moto G72没有真正的立体声扬声器，但听筒被用作第二个扬声器的替代品，使其能够创造一些立体声效果。这效果相当好，声音也可以变得相当响亮。

虽然它并不真正强大，为此缺乏一些低音，但对于这样一款负担得起的中档智能手机来说，声音至少是非常体面的。

为了获得更好的声音，你可以通过音频端口或蓝牙连接外部音频设备。所有现代的aptX编解码器和LHDC 4都支持。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto G72 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Realme 9 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 高效和持久

消耗功率

虽然摩托罗拉Moto G72在低负载下的耗电效率很高，但在高负载下有时也会从电池中消耗更多的电量。然而，在这个价格范围内，只有少数智能手机的效率更高。

摩托罗拉智能手机的最大充电功率为30瓦--包括相应的充电器。使用该充电器，最多只需略低于2小时就能为智能手机完全充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.7 / 1.1 / 1.5 Watt
Load	4.5 / 6.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Moto G72 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M5 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A23 5G 5000 mAh	OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G42 5000 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio G99	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-16%	-15%	16%	-8%	-39%	-33%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.9 -29%	1 -43%	0.8 -14%	1 -43%	1.037 ?(0.7 - 1.9, n=9) -48%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) -26%
Idle Average *	1.1	1.3 -18%	1.5 -36%	1 9%	1.5 -36%	1.917 ?(1.1 - 4.02, n=9) -74%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) -32%
Idle Maximum *	1.5	1.9 -27%	2 -33%	1.4 7%	2 -33%	2.16 ?(1.33 - 4.07, n=9) -44%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) -7%
Load Average *	4.5	4.6 -2%	3.6 20%	2.4 47%	2.6 42%	5.11 ?(2.9 - 7.49, n=9) -14%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -46%
Load Maximum *	6.5	6.8 -5%	5.3 18%	4.6 29%	4.5 31%	7.36 ?(4.8 - 10.2, n=9) -13%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -53%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Moto G72; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.83 (1.999-6.34)

Motorola Moto G72; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.84 (0.697-1.325)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Moto G72; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.94 (3.12-4.34)

Motorola Moto G72; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.84 (0.697-1.325)

电池寿命

尽管摩托罗拉Moto G72的电池寿命无法在同类产品中排名第一，但它提供了坚实的续航能力：在我们的WLAN测试中，15:29小时，在闲置操作中，将近40小时，都是很好的数值。

在负载情况下，从满电开始的5:33小时的运行时间也很不错，可以在离开插座的情况下进行更长时间的游戏。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		39h 56min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 33min

	Motorola Moto G72 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M5 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A23 5G 5000 mAh	OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G42 5000 mAh	Realme 9 5G 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		3%	9%	-1%	6%	11%
Reader / Idle	2396	2503 4%	2586 8%	1985 -17%	2223 -7%
H.264	1104	1087 -2%	1289 17%	1255 14%	1185 7%
WiFi v1.3	929	916 -1%	1099 18%	1064 15%	949 2%	1029 11%
Load	333	368 11%	305 -8%	277 -17%	406 22%

Pros

+ 非常明亮的OLED屏幕

+ 纤细轻巧

+ 纯净Android

+ 通过听筒提供清晰的语音质量

+ 包括充电器和保险箱

+ 长久的电池寿命

+ 几乎没有任何发热

Cons

- 低亮度下的PWM闪动

- 定位稍微不准确

- 没有5G

- 只有少数4G频率

结论 - 一款拥有出色屏幕的中档智能手机

摩托罗拉Moto G72在同价位产品中以几个特点脱颖而出。首先是高清晰度的摄像头，比其他同等价位的智能手机拍摄的照片略微清晰；然后是它纤细轻巧的外壳，同时不放弃大容量的电池；最后当然是极其明亮且色彩相当准确的OLED屏幕，尽管这也带来了PWM闪烁的缺点。

特别是在这个价格范围内，显示屏的真正HDR能力的亮度是非同寻常的：即使是一些高端智能手机也不会达到激活亮度传感器的近1000 cd/m²的亮度。

在性能方面，这款搭载联发科SoC的智能手机也能很好地跟上，你几乎不会注意到与搭载骁龙695在日常操作中，你几乎不会注意到与骁龙695设备的区别。虽然这款智能手机并不适合铁杆玩家，但那些能够限制其要求的人应该能够让大多数游戏运行。

另一方面，那些想要一个面向未来的智能手机的人可能会因为摩托罗拉Moto G72缺乏5G而望而却步。但除此之外，Moto G72除了在定位方面有一些较小的不准确之处，几乎没有显示出任何真正的弱点。

摩托罗拉Moto G72是一个全面的整体包装：买家将得到一个非常明亮的屏幕，一个体面的摄像头，以及良好的性能值。不幸的是，5G方面有所欠缺。

那些想多省几个欧元的人还可以通过摩托罗拉Moto G42得到一个OLED屏幕。摩托罗拉Moto G42但将不得不忍受性能的巨大损失。这款Redmi Note 11S也是一款经济实惠的智能手机，拥有AMOLED屏幕和良好的性能值。

价格和可用性

虽然在美国不容易找到摩托罗拉Moto G72，但在欧洲可以直接从制造商那里以280欧元的价格买到，而且在印度和其他一些国家也有售。

Motorola Moto G72 - 12/01/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

84%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

48 / 70 → 69%

Weight

91%

Battery

91%

Display

89%

Games Performance

27 / 64 → 42%

Application Performance

70 / 86 → 81%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

64 / 90 → 71%

Camera

65%

Average

75%

82%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 463417 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G72智能手机评测--OLED具有一流的亮度，但没有5G

Florian Schmitt, 2022-12- 5 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳--Moto智能手机很薄很轻

尺寸比较

设备 - 为谷歌支付做好准备

微型SD卡读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件--相当纯粹Android

通信和GNSS - 没有快速的移动互联网

电话功能和语音质量 - 使用听筒更好

照相机 - 高分辨率和其他什么？

附件和保修 - 包括大量的附件

输入设备和操作 - 快速指纹识别器

显示屏 - 几乎没有任何其他智能手机的显示屏是如此明亮的

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

表现 - 大约在班级水平上

游戏 - 60帧仍然是一个梦想

排放 - 几乎没有变暖

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Motorola Moto G72 audio analysis

Realme 9 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 高效和持久

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 一款拥有出色屏幕的中档智能手机

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison