宏碁掠夺者 Helios 18 2024 笔记本电脑评测：18 英寸游戏玩家的新硬件

Name: Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Brand: Acer

迷你 LED 列车

18 英寸笔记本电脑正在缓慢但肯定地成为小众产品。除了微星（MSI）、华硕（Asus）和 Alienware 之外，宏碁（Acer）也推出了合适的产品。我们对最新版的 Predator Helios 18 进行了测试。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/03/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Geforce Intel Raptor Lake

2023 年，宏碁开始销售 18 英寸笔记本电脑。虽然我们的第一台测试设备配备了酷睿 i9-13900HX和 GeForce RTX 4080而后续机型的测试配置则配备了酷睿 i9-14900HX和 GeForce RTX 4090.保持不变的是笔记本电脑强大的 Mini-LED 面板，它几乎完全不打折扣地给人留下了深刻印象（稍后详述）。宏碁安装了 2x 16 GB DDR5-5600 内存和两个 RAID-0 格式的 NVMe-SSD（M.2 2280），每个存储空间为 1 TB。在进行测试时，这款笔记本电脑尚未在美国上市，因此我们还无法提供有关其 MRSP 的任何信息。

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (Predator Helios 18 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 157 W PL2 / Short Burst, 95 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1590 MHz, RAM: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 546.18, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)

Display

18.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 168 PPI, B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), Mini-LED, WQXGA, glossy: no, HDR, 250 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0), 2048 GB

, NVMe-SSDs, two M.2-slots (both in use)

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Combined (Headset/Mic), Card Reader: microSD

Networking

Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 29.5 x 405 x 312

Battery

90 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 2 MP FHD

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 330 W Power Supply, Key Caps, Predator Sense, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3.278 kg, Power Supply: 1.226 kg

Links

Acer homepage
Acer notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

掠夺者 Helios 18 的竞争对手包括 18 英寸游戏机，如微星 Titan 18 HX A14以及华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 G834和 Alienware m18 R1-所有这些设备都作为对比设备列于表中。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.1 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2024	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.3 kg	29.5 mm	18.00"	2560x1600
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.6 kg	32.1 mm	18.00"	3840x2400
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	30.8 mm	18.00"	2560x1600
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	3.2 kg	29.15 mm	18.00"	2560x1600
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	3.9 kg	26.7 mm	18.00"	1920x1200

案例

说到这款设备的外壳，宏碁（Acer）保持了前代产品的原貌--不过仔细观察，你会发现有一些变化。制造商更换了键盘型号，并重新设计了机身背面的时尚灯带。这款笔记本电脑的盖子和底座顶部均由金属制成，因此仍然给人以高品质的感觉。我们对该设备的做工也没有任何负面评价。如果有的话，宏碁可以改进笔记本的铰链，因为它们有时会有点晃动。虽然机盖可以更加稳固，键盘的某些部分在用力按压时也会被推入，但我们仍然认为它的外壳是稳定的。它的设计既不沉闷，也不过分俏皮。

在重量方面，Predator Helios 18 属于中等水平。3.3 公斤的重量比华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 重，但比微星 Titan 18 和 Alienware m18 轻。

尺寸比较

Alienware m18 R1 AMD MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) DIN A4 ❌

连接性

该设备的连接选项非常现代化。背面有一个 HDMI 2.1 输出端口和两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口（包括 DisplayPort 和 Power Delivery），右侧有两个 USB 3.2 Gen-2 端口（A 型）和一个 Kensington 锁插槽。左侧还有一个 RJ45 端口、一个 USB 3.0 端口（A 型）、一个 microSD 读卡器和一个音频插孔。

SD 读卡器

安装的读卡器速度一般。只有 Alienware m18 能在一定程度上使用我们的参考卡，在这方面给我们留下了深刻印象。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	177.5 MB/s +104%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	87 MB/s
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	83.8 MB/s -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	72 (60.61^min - 73.13^max) MB/s -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	230.5 MB/s +156%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s +33%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	91.5 MB/s +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	90 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	85.99 MB/s -4%

交流

新款 Helios 18 配备了最先进的 Wi-Fi 7 芯片，但由于缺乏合适的硬件，我们只能对其进行有限的测试。在我们的标准测试中，其 Wi-Fi 模块的性能（发送）一直很稳定，（接收）性能也非常好。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Qualcomm WCN685x	1460 (1310^min - 1543^max) MBit/s +76%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) (831 - 1609, n=4)	1290 MBit/s +55%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s +49%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW	1011 (514^min - 1160^max) MBit/s +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	968 (656^min - 1200^max) MBit/s +16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	942 (475^min - 985^max) MBit/s +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)	831 (611^min - 909^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1681 (1662^min - 1704^max) MBit/s +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)	1589 (1385^min - 1671^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) (1317 - 1644, n=4)	1539 MBit/s -3%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Qualcomm WCN685x	1461 (766^min - 1548^max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -13%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW	1116 (932^min - 1352^max) MBit/s -30%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	872 (330^min - 895^max) MBit/s -45%

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø831 (611-909)

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (514-1160)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø968 (656-1200)

Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø926 (475-985)

Alienware m18 R1 AMD Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1460 (1310-1543)

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1589 (1385-1671)

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1116 (932-1352)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1681 (1662-1704)

Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (330-895)

Alienware m18 R1 AMD Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1436 (766-1548)

网络摄像头

由于采用了全高清分辨率，安装的网络摄像头比大多数笔记本电脑更清晰，但在色彩准确度方面仍有改进的余地。

ColorChecker Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW: 7.7 ∆E min: 1.95 - max: 15.26 ∆E

配件

Predator Helios 18 拥有一个有趣的特殊功能：它的包装盒中不仅有设备背面的可更换风扇网罩，还有两套不同的 WASD 键和一些键杆。不出所料，随附的 330 瓦电源装置相当笨重。

维护

它的维护选项让我们喜忧参半。拧下 14 颗 Torx 螺钉并撬开底板需要花费相当长的时间，此外，宏碁使用的保修封条（覆盖一颗螺钉）甚至可能会吓跑许多用户。在内部，你至少可以接触到冷却系统、电池、无线局域网模块、内存和固态硬盘。不过，后两者都被薄膜和垫子覆盖，更换起来并不方便。

保修

该笔记本电脑提供 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备

键盘

我们认为，这款笔记本电脑的灯光（单键 RGB）还可以再均匀一些。作为一款经典的橡胶圆顶键盘，它的键入手感出奇的好，只是声音有点大。除了一些细节（修改过的数字键盘），它的布局还是不错的。与其他制造商相比，宏碁没有做太多尝试，大多数功能都很实用。此外，宏碁笔记本电脑的按键尺寸（如大小合适的方向键）也值得称赞。

触摸板

它的触摸板也几乎完美无瑕。它的尺寸为 15 x 9 厘米，非常宽大，无需抬起手指即可长时间移动。此外，它光滑的表面还能确保手指在触摸板上顺利滑动。在手势支持和精确度方面，我们没有发现任何不足之处。

显示屏

2024 版本继承了前代产品的 Mini-LED 显示屏（WQXGA、16:10、250 Hz、HDR1000）。如果不考虑其在所有亮度下的闪烁现象（幸好这只是敏感用户的问题），这种技术与标准的 IPS 面板相比优势明显。


735 cd/m²	737 cd/m²	751 cd/m²
723 cd/m²	722 cd/m²	734 cd/m²
712 cd/m²	697 cd/m²	703 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 751 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 723.8 cd/m² Minimum: 45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 722 cd/m²
Contrast: 18050:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.383

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18"	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18"	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 18"	Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 AUO45A8 (B180QAN01.2), IPS, 2560x1600, 18"	Alienware m18 R1 AMD BOE NE18NZ1, IPS, 1920x1200, 18"
Display		-3%	-1%	0%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	99.7	98.1 -2%	99.9 0%	99.8 0%	98.5 -1%
sRGB Coverage	100	99.8 0%	100 0%	100 0%	99.7 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	91.6	86.2 -6%	90 -2%	91.8 0%	88.7 -3%
Response Times		-140%	3%	-15%	55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	8 ?(4.9, 3.1)	8.6 ?(4.2, 4.4) -8%	12 ?(8, 4) -50%	7.6 ?(4.4, 3.2) 5%	2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6) 65%
Response Time Black / White *	17.6 ?(15.2, 2.4)	81.8 ?(76, 5.8) -365%	10.7 ?(7.6, 3.1) 39%	17.8 ?(15.6, 2.2) -1%	9.6 ?(4.9, 4.7) 45%
PWM Frequency	4832 ?(100)	2592 ?(100) -46%	5733 ?(94) 19%	2509 -48%
Screen		-24%	17%	-82%	-54%
Brightness middle	722	467.5 -35%	937 30%	360 -50%	319.6 -56%
Brightness	724	459 -37%	934 29%	355 -51%	304 -58%
Brightness Distribution	93	90 -3%	89 -4%	92 -1%	87 -6%
Black Level *	0.04		0.066 -65%	0.21 -425%	0.25 -525%
Contrast	18050		14197 -21%	1714 -91%	1278 -93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.4	3.77 -11%	1.52 55%	3.82 -12%	1.22 64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.32	6.12 -15%	2.82 47%	7.38 -39%	3.1 42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.6	2.94 -84%	1.21 24%	2.24 -40%	0.47 71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.8	3.2 16%	1.7 55%	5.06 -33%	0.8 79%
Gamma	2.383 ^92%	2.43 ^91%	2.042 ^108%	2.52 ^87%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7051 ^92%	6478 ^100%	6578 ^99%	5657 ^115%	6471 ^100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-56% / -46%	6% / 10%	-32% / -52%	0% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

首先是令人印象深刻的亮度：平均 724 cd/m² 的亮度意味着即使在超亮环境下（指室外）也能使用该设备。结合约 0.04 cd/m² 的超低黑值，该屏幕可提供约 18,000:1 的高对比度。此外，它还具有广泛的色彩空间覆盖范围--虽然不能完全覆盖 AdobeRGB，但却能覆盖 100% 的 sRGB 和 DCI-P3，令人印象深刻。

遗憾的是，它的色彩精确度并不是开箱即用的最佳产品，因此专业用户在购买后应进行校准（我们的 ICC 文件链接在上）。

它的响应时间还算不错，但无法与 OLED 面板相比，后者的对比度和黑度都更好。另一方面，它们也有自己的弱点（如通常是反光表面）。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15.2 ms rise
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.9 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.1 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

4832 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 4832 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 4832 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能

Predator Helios 18 的组件是游戏笔记本电脑中的顶级型号。32 GB 内存和 2 TB 存储空间足以满足未来几年大多数用户的需求。它的 CPU 和 GPU 也是如此，由于笔记本电脑的显示屏分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素，这两个部件都还没有达到极限。

测试条件

在预装的制造商软件（Predator Sense）中，"场景 "下列出了几种工作模式，它们对性能和噪音排放有很大影响。由于 18 英寸笔记本电脑在涡轮增压模式下噪音极大（游戏时大于 60 分贝），因此所有测量均在性能模式下进行。因此，测定的速度和噪音值只能在一定程度上与前代产品进行比较。

Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra)	静音	平衡	性能	涡轮增压
噪音	38 dB(A) 43 dB(A) 49 dB(A) 61 dB(A)
			性能	130 fps 160 fps 180 fps 200 fps

处理器

酷睿 i9-14900HX 是英特尔 "猛禽湖 "系列中的顶级型号，虽然功耗较高，但性能卓越。英特尔利用 8 个带超线程的性能核心和 16 个不带 HT 的效率核心，实现了 32 个并行线程。在性能模式下，CPU 的性能略低于平均水平（与之前的平均水平相比下降了 6%）。此外，正如我们的 Cinebench 循环所显示的那样（见图），在较长的负载期间其性能会下降。而任何竞争设备都没有出现这种情况。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4064 (3787.52-4673.44)

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4753 (4700.35-4782.4)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4024 (3961.18-4098.11)

Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4541 (4495.39-4584.53)

Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5466 (5377.07-5540.93)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	85.4 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	81 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	80.7 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	80 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	79.8 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	74.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	64.1 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	34613 (33896.2^min - 34613.2^max) Points +32%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	32428 (29693.8^min - 32428.3^max) Points +24%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	30631 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17078 - 36249, n=34)	29130 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	28516 Points +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	26171 Points
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points -17%
Single Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2177 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	2176 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1720 - 2245, n=34)	2157 Points -1%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	2143 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2093 Points -4%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	1948 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points -14%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	13308 Points +35%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	12103 Points +22%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	11726 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6579 - 13832, n=34)	11084 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	10787 Points +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	9881 Points
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points -17%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	833 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	832 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (657 - 859, n=34)	826 Points -1%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	823 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	804 Points -3%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	747 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points -13%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	5541 (5377.07^min - 5540.93^max) Points +19%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	4782 (4700.35^min - 4782.4^max) Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	4673 (3787.52^min - 4673.44^max) Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4585 (4495.39^min - 4584.53^max) Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 5589, n=35)	4462 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	4098 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points -27%
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	312 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	309 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (247 - 323, n=34)	306 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	302 Points -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	300 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	295 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -12%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * -38%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	125 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (91 - 206, n=34)	119.5 Seconds * +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	118 Seconds * +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	106 Seconds * +15%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	104 Seconds * +17%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	87 Seconds * +30%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	140493 MIPS +31%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	121266 MIPS +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	119590 MIPS +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	114546 MIPS +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (66769 - 136645, n=34)	112494 MIPS +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	106977 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS -21%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	7381 MIPS +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	7172 MIPS +16%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (5452 - 7545, n=34)	7017 MIPS +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6977 MIPS +12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	6504 MIPS +5%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	6206 MIPS

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	18014 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	17695 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	17403 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13158 - 19665, n=34)	17369 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	16652 Points -4%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	16316 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years)	14171 Points -19%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2999 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2419 - 3129, n=34)	2973 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	2965 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2892 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	2876 Points -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	2843 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years)	2641 Points -11%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	20566 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	20029 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	19975 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	19802 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8618 - 23194, n=34)	19540 Points -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	19137 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points -26%
Single-Core
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	2124 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2118 Points +5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	2098 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1669 - 2210, n=34)	2092 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2054 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	2009 Points
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points -6%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	37.5 fps +27%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	30.9 fps +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	30.7 fps +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (16.8 - 38.9, n=34)	29.7 fps +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	29.5 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	29.2 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps -21%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	85.1 s *
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	49.5 s * +42%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +44%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	46.2 s * +46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	43.8 s * +49%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (31.4 - 85.1, n=34)	43.4 s * +49%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	41.8 s * +51%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.4225 sec *
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	0.4145 sec * +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3997 sec * +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3944 sec * +7%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3919 sec * +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=34)	0.3845 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4673 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

269 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

312 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

9881 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

832 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2176 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

26171 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	93.2 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	66 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	62.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	58.7 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	58.1 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	55.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	48 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	60169 KRay/s +152%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	29351 KRay/s +23%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	27414 KRay/s +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	25444 KRay/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13098 - 33474, n=33)	25096 KRay/s +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	23862 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s -9%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	252486 Points +113%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148888 Points +26%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	137015 Points +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128826 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (67573 - 166040, n=33)	125765 Points +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	118469 Points
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points -10%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	10389 MB/s +79%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7229 MB/s +25%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6889 MB/s +19%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3589 - 7979, n=33)	6212 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	6204 MB/s +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	5804 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	200651 Points +44%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148773 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141681 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	139146 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148966, n=33)	138709 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	135396 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points -16%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	32988 Points +118%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18256 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16121 Points +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	16046 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (10475 - 18517, n=33)	15369 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15099 Points
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points -13%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	134044 Points +127%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	72355 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	68687 Points +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	63748 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (32543 - 83662, n=33)	61872 Points +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	59005 Points
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	237881 MB/s +112%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	149040 MB/s +33%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138830 MB/s +24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=33)	137399 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	122250 MB/s +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	112197 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	2409 MB/s +42%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2149 MB/s +27%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1913 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1054 - 2292, n=33)	1815 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1789 MB/s +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1696 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s -20%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	31796 KRay/s +153%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16104 KRay/s +28%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15014 KRay/s +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	13608 KRay/s +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6809 - 18349, n=33)	13525 KRay/s +8%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	12565 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	50394 MPixel/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49710 MPixel/s +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	47343 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (23903 - 54702, n=33)	46637 MPixel/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s -16%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	34957 MPixel/s -26%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	33960 MPixel/s -28%

系统性能

其系统性能也不足以获得第一名。其 PCMark 10 总分与前代产品相当。该设备的内存达到了 DDR5-5600 内存的典型性能水平。

PCMark 10 / Score
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	9852 Points +20%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	8968 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	8801 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8230 - 9234, n=13)	8674 Points +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8549 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	8230 Points
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	12334 Points +12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	11628 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	11394 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10778 - 11628, n=13)	11125 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	11032 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10982 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	11388 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9458 - 11759, n=13)	10610 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	10528 Points +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10488 Points +5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	10225 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	9951 Points
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	18475 Points +34%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	16462 Points +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	15421 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (13219 - 16462, n=13)	15042 Points +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	14720 Points +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	13779 Points
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points -13%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2208 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2194 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1877 - 2344, n=10)	2119 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1929 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1877 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2059 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2055 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1738 - 2162, n=10)	1968 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1793 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1738 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2478 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2411 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2195 - 2660, n=10)	2387 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2212 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2195 Points
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1998 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	1944 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1478 - 2327, n=10)	1862 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1594 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1478 Points

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	387 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	327 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (279 - 339, n=10)	323 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	322 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	320 Points
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years)	303 Points

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	304 Points
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	295 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (246 - 309, n=8)	291 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	287 Points
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=153, last 2 years)	266 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years)	506 ms * -15%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	459 ms * -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	456 ms * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (428 - 535, n=11)	456 ms * -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	452 ms * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	449 ms * -2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	441 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		8230 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83392 MB/s +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	78590 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78016 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (38028 - 83392, n=33)	74739 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s -17%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	56992 MB/s -27%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	51423 MB/s -34%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86788 MB/s +2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	86406 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85323 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43306 - 87568, n=33)	80919 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s -20%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	61564 MB/s -28%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	54443 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77534 MB/s +11%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	75736 MB/s +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (37146 - 80589, n=33)	71949 MB/s +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	70089 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -5%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	61092 MB/s -13%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	51387 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	105 ns * -27%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -13%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	91.3 ns * -10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (76.1 - 105, n=33)	84.8 ns * -2%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	83.2 ns * -0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83 ns *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.8 ns * -0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

这款笔记本电脑的延迟时间可能大大低于旧版 Helios 18，但根据 LatencyMon 工具的分析，对于某些使用领域（实时音频和视频编辑）来说，延迟时间仍然过高。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8290.5 μs * -145%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	3388 μs *
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2384.5 μs * +30%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1155.8 μs * +66%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	1117.4 μs * +67%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

正如我们在介绍中提到的，宏碁将两个 NVMe 固态硬盘组合成一个 Raid 0 阵列。乍一看，这在连续读取和写入速度方面都达到了一流的效果。不过，笔记本电脑的散热似乎不太理想，因为我们在循环测试中发现，一段时间后性能偶尔会出现波动。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 8578 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1955 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 671.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 493.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1725 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1218 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 8.926 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 10.12 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	81.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	77.7 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	73 pt
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	68.5 pt
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	67.3 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	65.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	64.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	7045 (6975.86^min - 7044.54^max) MB/s
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	5424 (5395.57^min - 5423.86^max) MB/s -23%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (3087 - 7045, n=2)	5066 MB/s -28%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3975 (3933.84^min - 3975.36^max) MB/s -44%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3908 (3887.48^min - 3908.2^max) MB/s -45%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3504 (3460.3^min - 3503.92^max) MB/s -50%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s -51%
seq write
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	8992 (8801.75^min - 8992.01^max) MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (8109 - 8992, n=2)	8551 MB/s -5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	7291 (7191.64^min - 7291.38^max) MB/s -19%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	4889 (4680.84^min - 4888.75^max) MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	4335 (4306.29^min - 4335.44^max) MB/s -52%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4309 (4272.74^min - 4308.62^max) MB/s -52%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s -58%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	13588 (10727.3^min - 13588.3^max) MB/s +23%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	11019 (9854.1^min - 11018.8^max) MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (7439 - 11019, n=2)	9229 MB/s -16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7115 (6689.03^min - 7114.56^max) MB/s -35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	7084 (6413.06^min - 7083.97^max) MB/s -36%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	6329 (5886.29^min - 6328.58^max) MB/s -43%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -43%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	11472 (11391^min - 11471.6^max) MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (11187 - 11472, n=2)	11330 MB/s -1%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	10571 (10519.3^min - 10571.3^max) MB/s -8%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5398 (5134.26^min - 5397.97^max) MB/s -53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	5255 (5183.65^min - 5254.62^max) MB/s -54%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5125 (5108.87^min - 5125.2^max) MB/s -55%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s -58%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	81.6 (81.02^min - 81.62^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	80.7 (80.11^min - 80.66^max) MB/s -1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	75.7 (74.61^min - 75.65^max) MB/s -7%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (68.8 - 81.6, n=2)	75.2 MB/s -8%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	69.6 (68.6^min - 69.57^max) MB/s -15%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	65.8 (65.71^min - 65.83^max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s -19%
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	273 (271.42^min - 272.88^max) MB/s +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	259 (250.68^min - 258.82^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	230 (219.52^min - 229.87^max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s -14%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	219 (216.03^min - 218.97^max) MB/s -15%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (178.4 - 259, n=2)	219 MB/s -15%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	152.1 (149.74^min - 152.09^max) MB/s -41%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3829 (3376.24^min - 3829.14^max) MB/s +176%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3829 (3814.3^min - 3829.16^max) MB/s +176%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3732 (3273.44^min - 3732.1^max) MB/s +169%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s +84%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1623 (1464.8^min - 1623.24^max) MB/s +17%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (1385 - 1666, n=2)	1526 MB/s +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1385 (1275.7^min - 1385.11^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3225 (3169.52^min - 3224.75^max) MB/s +142%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2900 MB/s +118%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2627 (2557.39^min - 2627.4^max) MB/s +98%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s +58%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (1330 - 1433, n=2)	1382 MB/s +4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1377 (1306.51^min - 1377.05^max) MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1330 (1184.45^min - 1330.4^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	8367 Points +64%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8304 Points +63%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	8209 Points +61%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points +32%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	5369 Points +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	5102 Points
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (4895 - 5102, n=2)	4999 Points -2%
Score Read
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3403 Points +66%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3329 Points +62%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3272 Points +60%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points +19%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2194 Points +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	2049 Points
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (2002 - 2049, n=2)	2026 Points -1%
Score Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3490 Points +71%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3321 Points +63%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points +53%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3106 Points +52%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2092 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	2038 Points
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (1903 - 2038, n=2)	1971 Points -3%
Seq Read
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	9576.8 MB/s +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	8496.25 MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (8169 - 8496, n=2)	8333 MB/s -2%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5753.68 MB/s -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	5636.54 MB/s -34%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5423 MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s -42%
Seq Write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	8685.54 MB/s +14%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	7597.23 MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (7333 - 7597, n=2)	7465 MB/s -2%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5132.02 MB/s -32%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4360 MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	4294.95 MB/s -43%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s -51%
4K Read
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	86.4 MB/s +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	75.56 MB/s +8%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	69.86 MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (62.9 - 69.9, n=2)	66.4 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s -7%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	63.69 MB/s -9%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	61.69 MB/s -12%
4K Write
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	254 MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	207.25 MB/s +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	200.92 MB/s
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	184.27 MB/s -8%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (162.3 - 201, n=2)	181.6 MB/s -10%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	134.66 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Read
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2765.55 MB/s +145%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2700 MB/s +139%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2636.61 MB/s +133%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s +66%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1172.14 MB/s +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1129.76 MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (1122 - 1130, n=2)	1126 MB/s 0%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2866.57 MB/s +166%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2630 MB/s +144%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +135%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2408.06 MB/s +123%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1088.59 MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1077.68 MB/s
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (1008 - 1078, n=2)	1043 MB/s -3%
Access Time Read
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	0.111 ms * -152%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	0.046 ms * -5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	0.044 ms *
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (0.033 - 0.044, n=2)	0.0385 ms * +12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	0.036 ms * +18%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.025 ms * +43%
Access Time Write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	0.091 ms * -379%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	0.067 ms * -253%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * -155%
Average 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) (0.019 - 0.071, n=2)	0.045 ms * -137%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	0.022 ms * -16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	0.019 ms *
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.017 ms * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø9959 (5983.58-11023.65)

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12928 (8511.29-13109.92)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7049 (6155.14-7094.74)

Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø1601 (1116.1-6275.7)

Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6298 (5315.65-6330.46)

图形卡

GeForce RTX 4090 基于 Ada Lovelace 架构，是目前 Nvidia 最强大的笔记本显卡。它拥有 9,728 个着色器单元和 16GB GDDR6 VRAM，尤其是宏碁选择了 175 瓦的最大 TGP。即便如此，其 GPU 在性能模式下的表现仍不尽如人意。与 CPU 测试类似，它的性能比 RTX 4090 之前的平均水平低 6%。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	99.5 pt
Alienware m18 R1 AMD ^-1! AMD Radeon RX 7900M	93 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.7 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	90 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	88.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	87.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	68.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (54073 - 73027, n=42)	65041 Points +9%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	63978 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	61833 Points +3%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Radeon RX 7900M	59943 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	59871 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	59420 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points -27%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	167815 Points +15%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	145446 Points
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (95671 - 164399, n=14)	142227 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141676 Points -3%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50532 Points +17%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Radeon RX 7900M	50241 Points +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (40259 - 53059, n=41)	46365 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	43477 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	43140 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	42829 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points -28%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	22256 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16950 - 23292, n=43)	20950 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	20070 Points +7%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Radeon RX 7900M	19434 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18814 Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	18699 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points -31%

3DMark 11 Performance		44065 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		59876 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		33907 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		18542 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * -62%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	14 Seconds * -8%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9 - 19, n=39)	12.1 Seconds * +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	12 Seconds * +8%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	10 Seconds * +23%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * -104%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	21 Seconds * -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16 - 24, n=39)	18.3 Seconds * -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds * -0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	17 Seconds * +6%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * -32%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	225 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	209 Seconds * +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (144 - 305, n=39)	199.1 Seconds * +12%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	188 Seconds * +16%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	179 Seconds * +20%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Radeon RX 7900M, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	138 Seconds * +39%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

游戏基准测试也显示了类似的情况。在这方面，RTX 4090 也未能充分发挥其潜力。不过，这足以在 2560 x 1600 像素的原生分辨率下以完整的细节运行所有现代游戏。只有在玩要求极高或优化不佳的游戏时，情况才会变得困难，例如 堕落领主.在这种情况下，DLSS 可以提供帮助，例如，后者在 QHD/Ultra 下的运行速度为 72fps，而不是 43fps（画质设置）。通常情况下，RTX 4090 也有足够的储备用于 4K 屏幕（请参阅 GPU 页面).

Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	95.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	95 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	89.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	85.9 pt
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX	76.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	69.1 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	211.2 (165^min) fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (139.2 - 216, n=35)	198.5 fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	189.4 (165^min) fps +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	180 fps
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	175 fps -3%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX	167.7 (134^min) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps -29%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	152.7 (3.46^min, 111.1^P1) fps +14%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	139.2 (3.73^min, 90.9^P1) fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (91.1 - 167.7, n=40)	138.6 fps +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	136 (8.67^min, 100^P1) fps +1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	134 (22.7^min, 90.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps -16%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX	105 (4.76^min, 62.5^P1) fps -22%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	184 fps +17%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	182.1 fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (122.2 - 201, n=40)	173.4 fps +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	166.1 fps +6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	157.1 fps
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX	152.8 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps -24%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	385 (27.2^min, 274^P1) fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (233 - 421, n=39)	357 fps +17%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX	344 (145.8^min, 227^P1) fps +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	339 (38.9^min, 245^P1) fps +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	331 (34.1^min, 238^P1) fps +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	305 (14.5^min, 223^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps -26%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	186.4 (161.1^min) fps +5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	178.3 (150.2^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (115.7 - 220, n=42)	176.3 fps -1%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	174.5 (151.1^min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	161.3 (135.6^min) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps -16%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX	146.2 (121.3^min) fps -18%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	139.5 fps +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	136.8 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (77.8 - 166.2, n=46)	130.7 fps +14%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	126.1 fps +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	114.5 fps
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps -6%
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Radeon RX 7900M, R9 7945HX	83.7 fps -27%

Skull & Bones - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (85 - 98, n=3)	90.3 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	88 (40^min) fps +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	85 (43^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (37 - 98, n=8, last 2 years)	71.6 fps -16%

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	356 (23.9^min, 79.5^P0.1, 260^P1) fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (355 - 356, n=2)	356 fps 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	355 (9.17^min, 142.2^P0.1, 294^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (35.3 - 355, n=4, last 2 years)	235 fps -34%

Lords of the Fallen - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset
XMG Neo 17 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	51.9 (21.8^min, 24.2^P0.1, 35.3^P1) fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (43 - 51.9, n=2)	47.5 fps +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	43 (15.9^min, 26.7^P0.1, 33.5^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (21.9 - 43, n=5, last 2 years)	29.9 fps -30%

Counter-Strike 2 - 2560x1440 Very High Preset
XMG Neo 17 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	188.7 (33.3^min, 37.2^P0.1, 66.3^P1) fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (156.6 - 188.7, n=2)	172.7 fps +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	156.6 (23.8^min, 40.3^P0.1, 72^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (15.7 - 156.6, n=4, last 2 years)	80.5 fps -49%

Lies of P - 2560x1440 Best Preset
XMG Neo 17 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	173.1 (100.2^min, 106.7^P0.1, 123.6^P1) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (136.4 - 173.1, n=2)	154.8 fps +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	136.4 (32.2^min, 37.7^P0.1, 67.2^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (54.5 - 136.4, n=5, last 2 years)	88.6 fps -35%

EA Sports WRC - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:Epic AF:16x
XMG Neo 17 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	103 (13.4^min, 21.3^P0.1, 76.4^P1) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (97.9 - 103, n=2)	100.5 fps +3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	97.9 (9.79^min, 32.2^P0.1, 70.7^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (59.6 - 97.9, n=2, last 2 years)	78.8 fps -20%

Armored Core 6 - 2560x1440 Maximum Preset
XMG Neo 17 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	114.7 (33^min, 52.7^P0.1, 86.1^P1) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (92 - 114.7, n=2)	103.4 fps +12%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	92 (27.8^min, 47^P0.1, 68.2^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (15.8 - 92, n=7, last 2 years)	63.7 fps -31%

Atlas Fallen - 2560x1440 Very High Preset
XMG Neo 17 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	171.1 (34.7^min, 42.6^P0.1, 114.8^P1) fps +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (128.3 - 171.1, n=2)	149.7 fps +17%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	128.3 (23.9^min, 25.6^P0.1, 99.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (48.6 - 128.3, n=6, last 2 years)	79.8 fps -38%

为了测试 GPU 在较长时间内的性能表现，我们让 Helios 18 与角色扮演游戏进行了较量 游戏Witcher 3进行了大约60分钟的测试。结果如何？我们注意到帧速率完全没有下降。

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø174.8 (155-185)

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø201 (189-215)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø181.9 (172-189)

Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø173.6 (165-186)

Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M: Ø174 (67-188)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)			180.4	134	126.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)				180
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	226	205	192.8	178.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)			157.1		131.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	183.7	148.3	114.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)			146	123	115
Strange Brigade (2018)			329	305	243
Atlas Fallen (2023)			182	161	128.3
Armored Core 6 (2023)			109.3	103.5	92
The Crew Motorfest (2023)			60	60	60
Lies of P (2023)			208	187	136.4
Counter-Strike 2 (2023)			234	189.7	156.6
Lords of the Fallen (2023)			87.3	64.2	43
EA Sports WRC (2023)			135.2	115.1	97.9
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024)			357	356	355
Skull & Bones (2024)			133	106	85
Last Epoch (2024)			203	190	145.5

排放量

噪音排放

Predator Helios 18 最大的缺点之一是风扇控制能力较弱。在平衡模式下，当笔记本电脑空转时，风扇有时会开始不必要地旋转。在性能模式和涡轮增压模式下，这种情况会更加频繁和严重。在负载情况下，这款 18 英寸设备的表现并无异常。在 3D 使用中，性能模式下的噪音值为 48 至 51 dB(A)，但并不夸张。

Noise Level

Idle		30 / 36 / 44 dB(A)
Load		48 / 51 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
Noise		12%	8%	12%	15%
off / environment *	25	22.8 9%	24 4%	23 8%	22.4 10%
Idle Minimum *	30	23.8 21%	27 10%	23 23%	23 23%
Idle Average *	36	23.8 34%	28 22%	23 36%	23.4 35%
Idle Maximum *	44	28 36%	32 27%	23 48%	33.5 24%
Load Average *	48	38 21%	50 -4%	45.26 6%	33.5 30%
Witcher 3 ultra *	49	57.3 -17%	50 -2%	59.82 -22%	53.6 -9%
Load Maximum *	51	62.8 -23%	52 -2%	59.94 -18%	53.6 -5%

* ... smaller is better

温度

笔记本机箱底部的发热量最大。在 60 分钟的压力测试后，我们测得某些部分的温度超过了 50 °C，这意味着你不能把设备放在膝盖上玩游戏。顶部的温度仍然较低，最高可达 43 °C。空闲时，温度值相当适中，平均为 29 °C（顶部）和 30 °C（底部），完全没有问题。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39 °C	40 °C	43 °C
38 °C	40 °C	39 °C
29 °C	33 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 36.9 °C


59 °C	53 °C	42 °C
50 °C	43 °C	37 °C
29 °C	24 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 59 °C
Average: 40.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


32 °C	32 °C	28 °C
32 °C	32 °C	29 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 29.2 °C


33 °C	34 °C	33 °C
31 °C	32 °C	31 °C
25 °C	28 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 30.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 36 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41 °C	43 °C	43 °C
41 °C	43 °C	43 °C
30 °C	33 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 38.9 °C


63 °C	62 °C	48 °C
58 °C	56 °C	41 °C
32 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 63 °C
Average: 46 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).

	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M
Heat		8%	6%	1%	14%
Maximum Upper Side *	43	37.8 12%	49 -14%	35 19%	40.2 7%
Maximum Bottom *	59	37.6 36%	47 20%	56 5%	37.4 37%
Idle Upper Side *	32	34.8 -9%	29 9%	34 -6%	31.6 1%
Idle Bottom *	34	36 -6%	31 9%	39 -15%	30.6 10%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

我们使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试并未将组件推向极限。酷睿 i9-14900HX 的温度约为 81 °C，而GeForce RTX 4090 的温度约为 72 °C（热点 78 °C）。不过，由于时钟频率较高，硬件在游戏模式下会变得更热。在 Witcher 3 中，我们的工具测得温度约为 87 ℃（CPU）和 83 ℃（GPU）。

发言人

我们的音频分析证实，新款 Predator Helios 18 的音质比上一代更好。虽然低音仍然可以更有力，但中高音现在更加明显。85 dB（A）的最大音量也足以满足大多数用户的需求。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Alienware m18 R1 AMD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理

耗电量

宏碁可以对设备的功耗进行一些微调。尽管这款 18 英寸笔记本电脑具有主动图形切换功能，但在闲置模式下仍需要消耗大量电能，即 31 至 43 瓦。大多数竞争对手和老款 Helios 在这方面做得要好得多。我们的测试设备可能还存在一个错误。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / Watt
Idle	31 / 35 / 43 Watt
Load	144 / 318 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-3%	24%	22%	-34%	38%
Idle Minimum *	31	13.2 57%	14 55%	16 48%	30.3 2%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) 56%
Idle Average *	35	25.4 27%	17 51%	19 46%	55.6 -59%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) 46%
Idle Maximum *	43	53.5 -24%	24 44%	21.3 50%	101.1 -135%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) 38%
Load Average *	144	151.4 -5%	143 1%	124 14%	160.3 -11%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) 26%
Witcher 3 ultra *	228	336 -47%	251 -10%	289 -27%	216 5%
Load Maximum *	318	395.2 -24%	302 5%	319 -0%	332.1 -4%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) 22%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø228 (215-241)

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø245 (230-313)

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø35.2 (31.3-43)

Power consumption with external monitor

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø115.8 (101.3-221)

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø227 (224-229)

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø209 (195.7-240)

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø210 (197.4-220)

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø34.6 (31.1-42.4)

运行时间

其高功率要求导致电池续航时间非常有限。在亮度降至 150 cd/m² 的 WLAN 测试中，Predator Helios 18 的续航时间仅为 3 个多小时。相比之下，ROG Strix Scar 18 的续航时间则超过了 7 小时。总的来说，90 瓦时的电池容量并不小。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		3h 12min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 04min

	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M, 97 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		22%	80%	50%	-46%	65%
WiFi v1.3	192	252 31%	461 140%	264 38%	85 -56%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 96%
Load	64	72 13%	77 20%	103 61%	41 -36%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 33%
Reader / Idle		353	612		268	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
H.264			447	290		408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 明亮且对比度高的 Mini-LED 显示屏

+ 广泛的照明

+ 出色的输入设备

+ 高品质外壳

+ 2x 雷电 4

Cons

- 电池寿命可以更长

- 风扇性能不理想

- 闲置消耗大

- 固态硬盘有时会节流

- 保修封条

判决

Acer Predator Helios 18 2024：测试设备由宏碁德国公司提供

2024 版本是对现有的掠夺者太阳神18.

性能方面，其酷睿 i9-14900HX和 GeForce RTX 4090和旧版酷睿 i9-13900HX和 GeForce RTX 4080.另一方面，其宽高比为 16:10 的 WQXGA-MiniLED 显示屏继续提供令人印象深刻的画质（亮度、对比度、色彩空间等）。此外，还有出色的输入设备和现代化的连接选项（2x Thunderbolt 4）。

预算充足、要求苛刻的游戏玩家一定能享受到全方位的无忧体验。

不过，就目前的状态而言，Predator Helios 18 刚刚错过了 "非常好 "的评价。除了风扇控制（有时会导致恼人的转速）之外，宏碁还可以修改笔记本电脑的空闲功耗，目前这仍然会导致运行时间不足。

目前市场上可能还没有许多竞争对手，但它们至少与该设备不相上下--无论是微星泰坦 18还是华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18.

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，搭载酷睿 i9-14900HX 和GeForce RTX 4090 的 Predator Helios 18 尚未在美国发售。

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW - 02/27/2024 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

71 / 80 → 89%

Weight

55 / 10-66 → 80%

Battery

53 / 95 → 56%

Display

92%

Games Performance

99%

Application Performance

90%

Temperature

82 / 95 → 86%

Noise

59 / 90 → 65%

Audio

80%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Average

75%

87%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 宏碁掠夺者 Helios 18 2024 笔记本电脑评测：18 英寸游戏玩家的新硬件

Florian Glaser, 2024-03- 3 (Update: 2024-03- 3)

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例

尺寸比较

连接性

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

配件

维护

保修

输入设备

键盘

触摸板

显示屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放量

噪音排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW audio analysis

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG audio analysis

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) audio analysis

Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 audio analysis

Alienware m18 R1 AMD audio analysis

电源管理

耗电量

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Pros

Cons

判决

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison