Honor 200 Pro 评测--配备 2D 人脸识别功能的高端智能手机能否克服自身不足?
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
2024 年 7 月30日更新: Honor 已经证实,这里确实只使用了 2D 人脸识别技术,这与之前的报道相反。
得益于与巴黎 Studio Harcourt 的合作,Honor 200 Pro 将自己视为具有数码单反相机品质的工作室级人像摄影大师。Studio Harcourt 以拍摄黑白人像和电影灯光而闻名,现在它的专业技术将帮助顶级手机实现富有表现力的摄影。
为此,它安装了一个相对较大的 1/1.3 英寸图像传感器,分辨率为 5000 万像素,可以使用各种 Studio Harcourt 滤镜。在本 另一篇文章中我们将详细介绍在巴黎 Studio Harcourt 直接拍摄的肖像照片。
120 Hz 6.78 英寸 AMOLED 面板峰值亮度超过 4000 尼特,令人印象深刻。100 瓦快速充电和 高通骁龙 8s 第 3 代处理器也是Honor 200 Pro 的优势所在。制造商为这款完整的产品标价 799.90 欧元(建议零售价)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.5 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Honor 200 Pro SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735 | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" | 2700x1224 | |
88.1 % | v8 | 06/2024 | OnePlus 12 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 220 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.82" | 3168x1440 | |
89.4 % | v7 (old) | 01/2024 | Xiaomi 14 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 223 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.73" | 3200x1440 | |
90 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Samsung Galaxy S24 Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940 | 167 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.20" | 2340x1080 | |
88.9 % | v7 (old) | 11/2023 | Google Pixel 8 Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7 | 187 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.20" | 2400x1080 | |
84.6 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735 | 197 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2712x1220 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们已经更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果(可在此处查阅 这里).
保护套 -Honor 带有一点塑料的智能手机
Honor 200 Pro 有三种颜色可供选择,其中海洋青色是该公司在线商店的独家款式。
这款高档智能手机的制造质量无可挑剔。不过,就我们的口味而言,这款售价 800 欧元的Honor 手机(摄像头模块、边框)上使用的塑料有点多。制造商没有说明背面使用了哪种材料,但特殊的表面结构意味着它摸起来不像玻璃。不过,指纹不是问题。
Honor 200 Pro 在雨淋时也不会有任何问题,但不能浸入水中,因为它只通过了 IP65 认证。
Honor 手机正面的屏占比为 90.2%,屏占比非常高。说到显示屏:制造商没有说明使用了哪种保护玻璃。可能是自产的硅酸铝玻璃。
功能 -Honor 200 Pro 仅配备 USB 2.0
Honor 200 Pro 的内部 UFS 4.0 内存可自由使用,容量为 457 GB;内部内存不可扩展。除了 NFC、USB OTG、Miracast 和红外爆破器之外,这款顶级手机只提供了一个 USB 2.0 端口,没有有线图像输出。在连接方面,它也只提供蓝牙 5.3 和 WiFi 6,不过内置的 骁龙 8s Gen 3理论上支持更先进的标准。
遗憾的是,我们无法使用Honor 200 Pro 进行连接 M2.SSD 的拷贝测试。三星 980 Pro 始终是从高级手机的 USB 接口弹出的。不过,Honor 智能手机确实支持 exFAT 文件系统和 NTFS,后者是微软系统的首选。
软件 -Honor 智能手机,含Android 14
在我们测试时,Honor 200 Pro 搭载的是基于Android 14 的 MagicOS 8.0。Honor 承诺至少提供三次主要Android 更新和四年的安全更新。当然还不错,但 Galaxy S24的支持时间要长得多。
Honor 过去,Magic5 Pro 在提供新的Android 更新方面并不及时。例如,Magic5 Pro 在收到Android 14 更新时就拖延了很长时间。根据制造商 的说法,200 Pro 每月都会收到安全更新,但目前还不清楚会持续多久。不过,目前的安全补丁是从 2024 年 5 月测试期间开始提供的,与上市后不久的情况大相径庭。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Honor 带有 5G 功能的手机
Honor 200 Pro 支持接入移动 5G 网络,也支持 4G 频率。在家庭 Wi-Fi 网络中,Honor 手机仅提供 Wi-Fi 6,结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,足以实现平均超过 800 MBit/s 的不错传输速率。
Networking | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
OnePlus 12 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Google Pixel 8 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
为了能够在实践中评估定位精度,我们与 Garmin Venu 2 同时记录了一条路线,以便进行比较。
详细的路线显示了高级智能手机的轻微误差,但总体定位仍然准确。
卫星系统(北斗 - B1I+B1C、GPS - L1、伽利略 - E1、QZSS - L1、Glonass - G1)在测试中只提供单频。
电话功能和语音质量 -Honor 200 Pro(带 VoLTE 功能
Honor 200 Pro 可接受两张 nanoSIM 卡,还可选配 eSIM 卡。此外,还支持 VoLTE 和通过家庭 Wi-Fi 通话(Wi-Fi 通话)。
语音质量很好。语音再现清晰,并能有效过滤安静的环境噪音。
摄像头 -Honor 带有三摄像头的智能手机
前置的 5000 万像素自拍镜头支持 UHD 视频,在日常使用中可提供良好的图像质量。配备 OIS 的 5000 万像素主摄像头也是如此,具有宽动态范围和良好的锐度。不过,Honor 200 Pro 的色彩往往过于饱和,尤其是绿色和红色,非常鲜艳。在弱光环境下,这款高级手机也能拍出细节丰富的好照片。
不过,其他相机镜头受到了明显的成本削减限制。虽然Honor 200 Pro 配备了高分辨率 50MPix、带 OIS 和 2.5 倍光学倍率的长焦摄像头,但超过 3 倍变焦水平后,细节很快就会丢失。1200 万像素的超广角镜头缺乏清晰度,并表现出许多图像误差和失真。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra Wide-angleZoom 5x配件和保修 -Honor 不带充电器的手机
Honor 200 Pro 的包装盒中没有电源适配器。如果您通过公司自己的网上商店订购,您可以以一欧元的价格获得超级充电适配器(100W,零售价:49.90 欧元)。
显示屏出厂时还贴有保护膜。包装盒内还有一根 USB 线和信息资料。
制造商提供 24 个月的保修服务 保修在欧洲。可选择 Care+ 屏幕保护保险套餐(12 个月)。
输入设备和操作 -Honor 200 Pro,带面部解锁功能
由于刷新率高达 120 Hz,6.78 英寸 OLED 面板上的输入反应灵敏,动画效果流畅。振动电机也表现出色。
用户可以使用手指和面部进行生物识别安全。OLED 显示屏上的光学指纹扫描仪虽然速度不是最快的,但能可靠地识别用户。
此外,还可通过前置摄像头和邻近的 ToF 传感器进行 2D 人脸识别,这在速度方面具有积极作用。
显示屏 -Honor 配备 OLED 的手机
6.78 英寸 AMOLED 面板具有 FullHD+ 分辨率,在我们的测量中亮度惊人。在播放 HDR 内容时,我们测定的最高亮度超过 4,000 cd/m²。然而,实际的 APL18 测试(平均图像电平)结果亮度明显较低,为 1,097 cd/m²,相对于白色显示屏的 1,208 cd/m²,这对于 OLED 面板来说是不寻常的。
Honor 200 Pro 使用 PWM 调制来控制亮度。我们用 Rigol 软件测得的频率为 60 Hz,这可能是由于 BFI(黑框插入)造成的。我们用示波器测量的振幅曲线均匀且相当平坦,为 18.5%。Honor ,在手机规格表中显示 PWM 频率为 3,840 Hz,这证实了我们的手动测量结果(3,333 Hz)。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1208 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Honor 200 Pro OLED, 2700x1224, 6.8" | OnePlus 12 AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | Xiaomi 14 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S24 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Google Pixel 8 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.2" | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -49% | -38% | -97% | -42% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 1208 | 1026 -15% | 1025 -15% | 1349 12% | 1450 20% | 1326 10% |
Brightness | 1194 | 991 -17% | 1046 -12% | 1369 15% | 1410 18% | 1312 10% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 91 -7% | 95 -3% | 97 -1% | 92 -6% | 90 -8% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 1.19 -32% | 1.1 -22% | 3.3 -267% | 1.1 -22% | 0.51 43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.4 | 3.3 -136% | 2.9 -107% | 5 -257% | 4.2 -200% | 1.85 -32% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.4 -85% | 2.2 -69% | 2.4 -85% | 2.1 -62% | 0.6 54% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.25 98% | 1.97 112% | 2.24 98% | 2.191 100% |
CCT | 6413 101% | 6920 94% | 6622 98% | 6635 98% | 6584 99% | 1355 480% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 18.52 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列 (最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
我们使用照片光谱仪和卡尔曼分析软件来检查色彩的准确性。我们在正常色彩模式下使用标准色温预设值获得最佳效果。色彩和灰度表现的偏差都在目标范围内(<3),而且一般都很低。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.699 ms rise | |
↘ 0.709 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6555 ms rise | |
↘ 1.349 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
对于户外使用,Honor 200 Pro 有足够的亮度储备,即使在晴天也能轻松阅读。不过,手动亮度控制(630 cd/m²)下显示屏上的反光会导致可读性问题。可视角度的稳定性令人满意。
性能 -Honor 200 Pro(配备高通 SoC
Honor 200 Pro 基于 骁龙 8s Gen 3 - 强大的芯片组,由于采用了 Cortex-X4 内核,其单核性能几乎与 骁龙 8 代 3.
由于时钟频率较低(3.0 GHz),Honor 智能手机比 OnePlus 12 落后约 15%。 一加 12旗舰 SoC 的 15%。不过,在 Geekbench 多核测试中,两款手机的差距为 30%。在系统基准测试(Antutu、CrossMark)中,与搭载骁龙 8 代 3 的竞争对手的差距更大。
关于骁龙 8s Gen 3 与骁龙 8 系列其他 SoC 规格的全面比较,请参阅我们的 另一篇文章.
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 78964, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (13576 - 15572, n=4) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 |
根据制造商的说法,安装的 Adreno 735Honor 200 Pro 中安装的是 Adreno 740来自 骁龙 8 第二代提高了能效。不过,与 Adreno 750 相比,Honor 智能手机的能效有时会低于 95%。 Adreno 750.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Google Pixel 8 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Google Pixel 8 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Google Pixel 8 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Google Pixel 8 |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Honor 200 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Google Pixel 8 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Honor 200 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Google Pixel 8 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Honor 200 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Google Pixel 8 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Google Pixel 8 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Google Pixel 8 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Honor 200 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Google Pixel 8 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Honor 200 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Google Pixel 8 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Google Pixel 8 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Honor 200 Pro |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126) | |
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126) | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=158, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (65.9 - 247, n=5) | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126) | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122) | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Honor 200 Pro |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=157, last 2 years) | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=5) | |
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122) | |
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126) |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 200 Pro | OnePlus 12 | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Google Pixel 8 | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 81% | 16% | -29% | 68% | 60% | -11% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1992.32 | 3297.57 66% | 3701.23 86% | 1655.48 -17% | 3926.6 97% | 3555 ? 78% | 1729 ? -13% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 1644.98 | 3246.21 97% | 1435.39 -13% | 895.86 -46% | 3558.6 116% | 2898 ? 76% | 1338 ? -19% |
Random Read 4KB | 276.23 | 438.5 59% | 373.12 35% | 183.55 -34% | 349.1 26% | 389 ? 41% | 266 ? -4% |
Random Write 4KB | 321.09 | 652.8 103% | 175.98 -45% | 266.68 -17% | 430.6 34% | 468 ? 46% | 292 ? -9% |
游戏 -Honor 手机只能达到 60 fps
Honor 200 Pro 可以很好地运行 PlayStore 上的所有游戏,但 GFXBench 的屏幕数值却让人对 HFR 游戏不抱什么希望。遗憾的是,我们使用应用程序进行的 FPS 测量也证实了这一点。.120 Hz 的高级手机不可能达到 60 帧以上。
排放 -Honor 200 Pro 大幅度节流
温度
在负载情况下,机箱表面温度较高。我们使用 3DMark 压力测试来检查内部的热量发展情况。在这里 高通 SoC在计算密集型负载下显示出较高的帧速率波动。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Google Pixel 8 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
OnePlus 12 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | |
Honor 200 Pro |
发言人
Honor 200 Pro 的两个扬声器提供了良好的音质和轻快的低音,尽管超高音调略显不足。耳机可通过 USB 端口连接。喜欢使用无线输出的用户可以使用蓝牙 5.3 标准。
Honor 200 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 -Honor 智能手机充电迅速
耗电量
电池容量为 5,200 毫安时,最大充电功率为 100 瓦。在我们的测试中,Honor 200 Pro 仍然需要近四分之三小时(44 分钟)才能充满电。无线充电的最大功率为 66 瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.01 / 0.19 Watt |
Idle | 1.11 / 2.67 / 2.75 Watt |
Load |
8.13 / 8.64 Watt |
Honor 200 Pro 5200 mAh | OnePlus 12 5400 mAh | Xiaomi 14 Pro 4880 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24 4000 mAh | Google Pixel 8 4575 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra 4500 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | 25% | 1% | 33% | 27% | -6% | 24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.11 | 1.3 -17% | 0.89 20% | 0.42 62% | 0.56 50% | 0.9 19% | 1.353 ? -22% | 0.907 ? 18% |
Idle Average * | 2.67 | 0.95 64% | 1.05 61% | 0.93 65% | 1.08 60% | 1.2 55% | 2.29 ? 14% | 1.444 ? 46% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.75 | 1.12 59% | 1.11 60% | 1.07 61% | 1.17 57% | 1.4 49% | 2.42 ? 12% | 1.607 ? 42% |
Load Average * | 8.13 | 10.55 -30% | 9.03 -11% | 15.43 -90% | 8.01 1% | 6.5 20% | 8.5 ? -5% | 6.25 ? 23% |
Load Maximum * | 8.64 | 11.72 -36% | 9.06 -5% | 16.51 -91% | 8.89 -3% | 9.2 -6% | 11.1 ? -28% | 9.24 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
电池续航时间非常吸引人。Honor 200 Pro 的 WLAN 电池测试时间约为 16.5 小时,在调整显示屏亮度(150 cd/m²)的情况下可持续很长时间。
Honor 200 Pro 5200 mAh | OnePlus 12 5400 mAh | Xiaomi 14 Pro 4880 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24 4000 mAh | Google Pixel 8 4575 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra 4500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 993 | 1237 25% | 897 -10% | 880 -11% | 814 -18% | 953 -4% |
Pros
Cons
判决
Honor 200 Pro 在测试中给我们留下了复杂的感觉。这款高档手机外观时尚,显示屏边缘非常窄,但唯一的防溅外壳给人的感觉却像是一款相当廉价的中端机型。内置处理器非常强大,但低效的散热和严重的系统节流破坏了高性能的 高通 SoC.
Honor 200 Pro 并不总能跻身高端产品行列。
OLED 面板无可挑剔,在日常使用中很好地兑现了规格表中的承诺。超过 4000 尼特的亮度、出色的校准和高刷新率让显示器发烧友欣喜若狂。不过,在设备方面,作为一款高端设备,它还存在许多较小的不足(没有 WiFi 7、没有 USB 3.2、没有双频或三频 GNSS......)。
智能手机市场在这一价格范围内提供了一些有趣的替代产品 (三星Galaxy S24, 谷歌 Pixel 8, 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Ultra).如果你不怕进口,还应该看看 小米 14 Pro.
价格和供应情况
Honor 200 Pro 的零售价为 800 欧元(869 美元),可直接从制造商处购买。.
注:我们已经更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里.
Honor 200 Pro
-
07/25/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.