Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Honor 200 Pro 评测--配备 2D 人脸识别功能的高端智能手机能否克服自身不足？

我们的测量值为 4 110 尼特！

Honor 200 Pro 的目标是以其极其明亮的 OLED 面板和快速充电功能为自己加分。然而，就其价格范围而言，Honor 智能手机确实存在一些不足之处。请点击此处查看我们的测试报告中的不足之处。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Smartphone Touchscreen

2024 年 7 月30日更新： Honor 已经证实，这里确实只使用了 2D 人脸识别技术，这与之前的报道相反。

得益于与巴黎 Studio Harcourt 的合作，Honor 200 Pro 将自己视为具有数码单反相机品质的工作室级人像摄影大师。Studio Harcourt 以拍摄黑白人像和电影灯光而闻名，现在它的专业技术将帮助顶级手机实现富有表现力的摄影。

为此，它安装了一个相对较大的 1/1.3 英寸图像传感器，分辨率为 5000 万像素，可以使用各种 Studio Harcourt 滤镜。在本 另一篇文章中我们将详细介绍在巴黎 Studio Harcourt 直接拍摄的肖像照片。

120 Hz 6.78 英寸 AMOLED 面板峰值亮度超过 4000 尼特，令人印象深刻。100 瓦快速充电和 高通骁龙 8s 第 3 代处理器也是Honor 200 Pro 的优势所在。制造商为这款完整的产品标价 799.90 欧元（建议零售价）。

Honor 200 Pro (200 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 735
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.78 inch 19.85:9, 2700 x 1224 pixel 437 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 457 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM: 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz , 1900 MHz; UMTS: 900 MHz, 850 MHz, 1700 MHz, 1900 MHz, 2100 MHz; LTE: Band 1, 3 7, 38, 12, 13, 17, 28, 20, 32, 33, 34, 41; 5G: n1 (2100 MHz), n3 (1800 MHz), n5 (850 MHz), n7 (2600 MHz), n8 (900 MHz), n20 (800 MHz), n26 (850 MHz), n38 (2600 MHz), n41 (2500 MHz), n77 (3700 MHz), n78 (3500 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 163.3 x 75.2
Battery
5200 mAh
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, OIS, video @2160p/​30fps) + 50 MPix (f/2.4, OIS, telephoto lens) + 12 MPix (f/2.2, wide)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.1) + 2 MPix (f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, MagicOS 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
199 g
Price
800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
80.5 %v8
07 / 2024
Honor 200 Pro
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735		199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2700x1224
88.1 %v8
06 / 2024
OnePlus 12
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		220 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"3168x1440
89.4 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi 14 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		223 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
90 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy S24
Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940		167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"2340x1080
88.9 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Google Pixel 8
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.20"2400x1080
84.6 %v8
07 / 2024
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735		197 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2712x1220

保护套 -Honor 带有一点塑料的智能手机

Honor 黑白 200 Pro
Honor 黑白 200 Pro

Honor 200 Pro 有三种颜色可供选择，其中海洋青色是该公司在线商店的独家款式。

这款高档智能手机的制造质量无可挑剔。不过，就我们的口味而言，这款售价 800 欧元的Honor 手机（摄像头模块、边框）上使用的塑料有点多。制造商没有说明背面使用了哪种材料，但特殊的表面结构意味着它摸起来不像玻璃。不过，指纹不是问题。

Honor 200 Pro 在雨淋时也不会有任何问题，但不能浸入水中，因为它只通过了 IP65 认证。

Honor 手机正面的屏占比为 90.2%，屏占比非常高。说到显示屏：制造商没有说明使用了哪种保护玻璃。可能是自产的硅酸铝玻璃。

Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测

尺寸比较

❌
164.3 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 220 g163.3 mm 75.2 mm 8.2 mm 199 g161.4 mm 75.3 mm 8.49 mm 223 g161.1 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 197 g150.5 mm 70.8 mm 8.9 mm 187 g147 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 -Honor 200 Pro 仅配备 USB 2.0

Honor 200 Pro 的内部 UFS 4.0 内存可自由使用，容量为 457 GB；内部内存不可扩展。除了 NFC、USB OTG、Miracast 和红外爆破器之外，这款顶级手机只提供了一个 USB 2.0 端口，没有有线图像输出。在连接方面，它也只提供蓝牙 5.3 和 WiFi 6，不过内置的 骁龙 8s Gen 3理论上支持更先进的标准。

遗憾的是，我们无法使用Honor 200 Pro 进行连接 M2.SSD 的拷贝测试。三星 980 Pro 始终是从高级手机的 USB 接口弹出的。不过，Honor 智能手机确实支持 exFAT 文件系统和 NTFS，后者是微软系统的首选。

软件 -Honor 智能手机，含Android 14

在我们测试时，Honor 200 Pro 搭载的是基于Android 14 的 MagicOS 8.0。Honor 承诺至少提供三次主要Android 更新和四年的安全更新。当然还不错，但 Galaxy S24的支持时间要长得多。

Honor 过去，Magic5 Pro 在提供新的Android 更新方面并不及时。例如，Magic5 Pro 在收到Android 14 更新时就拖延了很长时间。根据制造商 的说法，200 Pro 每月都会收到安全更新，但目前还不清楚会持续多久。不过，目前的安全补丁是从 2024 年 5 月测试期间开始提供的，与上市后不久的情况大相径庭。

Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Honor 带有 5G 功能的手机

Honor 200 Pro 支持接入移动 5G 网络，也支持 4G 频率。在家庭 Wi-Fi 网络中，Honor 手机仅提供 Wi-Fi 6，结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，足以实现平均超过 800 MBit/s 的不错传输速率。

Networking
Honor 200 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
828 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼53%
OnePlus 12
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1857 (min: 1766) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1119 (min: 1086) MBit/s ∼63%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1717 (min: 1627) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1783 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1728 (min: 1374) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1731 (min: 1657) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
iperf3 receive AXE11000
774 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼51%
Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000
891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼88%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
863 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
719 (min: 637) MBit/s ∼42%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼80%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø827 (801-852)
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1857 (1766-1917)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (483-972)
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (1086-1176)
楼内全球导航卫星系统精度测试
楼内全球导航卫星系统精度测试
户外全球导航卫星系统精度测试
户外全球导航卫星系统精度测试

为了能够在实践中评估定位精度，我们与 Garmin Venu 2 同时记录了一条路线，以便进行比较。

详细的路线显示了高级智能手机的轻微误差，但总体定位仍然准确。

卫星系统（北斗 - B1I+B1C、GPS - L1、伽利略 - E1、QZSS - L1、Glonass - G1）在测试中只提供单频。

Garmin Venu 2 对Honor 200 Pro
Garmin Venu 2 对Honor 200 Pro

电话功能和语音质量 -Honor 200 Pro（带 VoLTE 功能

Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测

Honor 200 Pro 可接受两张 nanoSIM 卡，还可选配 eSIM 卡。此外，还支持 VoLTE 和通过家庭 Wi-Fi 通话（Wi-Fi 通话）。

语音质量很好。语音再现清晰，并能有效过滤安静的环境噪音。

摄像头 -Honor 带有三摄像头的智能手机

与Honor 200 Pro 自拍
与Honor 200 Pro 自拍

前置的 5000 万像素自拍镜头支持 UHD 视频，在日常使用中可提供良好的图像质量。配备 OIS 的 5000 万像素主摄像头也是如此，具有宽动态范围和良好的锐度。不过，Honor 200 Pro 的色彩往往过于饱和，尤其是绿色和红色，非常鲜艳。在弱光环境下，这款高级手机也能拍出细节丰富的好照片。

不过，其他相机镜头受到了明显的成本削减限制。虽然Honor 200 Pro 配备了高分辨率 50MPix、带 OIS 和 2.5 倍光学倍率的长焦摄像头，但超过 3 倍变焦水平后，细节很快就会丢失。1200 万像素的超广角镜头缺乏清晰度，并表现出许多图像误差和失真。

0,6x
0,6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
2,5x
2,5x
5x
5x
10x
10x
50x
50x
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测
Honor 200 Pro 智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra Wide-angleZoom 5x
ColorChecker
11.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
11 ∆E
4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor 200 Pro: 8.98 ∆E min: 0.84 - max: 16.91 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
25 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
39 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
39 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor 200 Pro: 30.8 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 44.2 ∆E

配件和保修 -Honor 不带充电器的手机

Honor 200 Pro 的 100 瓦电源装置
Honor 200 Pro 的 100 瓦电源装置

Honor 200 Pro 的包装盒中没有电源适配器。如果您通过公司自己的网上商店订购，您可以以一欧元的价格获得超级充电适配器（100W，零售价：49.90 欧元）。

显示屏出厂时还贴有保护膜。包装盒内还有一根 USB 线和信息资料。

制造商提供 24 个月的保修服务 保修在欧洲。可选择 Care+ 屏幕保护保险套餐（12 个月）。

输入设备和操作 -Honor 200 Pro，带面部解锁功能

由于刷新率高达 120 Hz，6.78 英寸 OLED 面板上的输入反应灵敏，动画效果流畅。振动电机也表现出色。

用户可以使用手指和面部进行生物识别安全。OLED 显示屏上的光学指纹扫描仪虽然速度不是最快的，但能可靠地识别用户。

此外，还可通过前置摄像头和邻近的 ToF 传感器进行 2D 人脸识别，这在速度方面具有积极作用。

显示屏 -Honor 配备 OLED 的手机

OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。
OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。

6.78 英寸 AMOLED 面板具有 FullHD+ 分辨率，在我们的测量中亮度惊人。在播放 HDR 内容时，我们测定的最高亮度超过 4,000 cd/m²。然而，实际的 APL18 测试（平均图像电平）结果亮度明显较低，为 1,097 cd/m²，相对于白色显示屏的 1,208 cd/m²，这对于 OLED 面板来说是不寻常的。

Honor 200 Pro 使用 PWM 调制来控制亮度。我们用 Rigol 软件测得的频率为 60 Hz，这可能是由于 BFI（黑框插入）造成的。我们用示波器测量的振幅曲线均匀且相当平坦，为 18.5%。Honor ，在手机规格表中显示 PWM 频率为 3,840 Hz，这证实了我们的手动测量结果（3,333 Hz）。

1184
cd/m²		1192
cd/m²		1193
cd/m²
1188
cd/m²		1208
cd/m²		1201
cd/m²
1181
cd/m²		1196
cd/m²		1200
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1208 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1193.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1208 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Honor 200 Pro
OLED, 2700x1224, 6.8"		OnePlus 12
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"		Xiaomi 14 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"		Google Pixel 8
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.2"		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-49%
-38%
-97%
-42%
13%
Brightness middle
1208
1026
-15%
1025
-15%
1349
12%
1450
20%
1326
10%
Brightness
1194
991
-17%
1046
-12%
1369
15%
1410
18%
1312
10%
Brightness Distribution
98
91
-7%
95
-3%
97
-1%
92
-6%
90
-8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
1.19
-32%
1.1
-22%
3.3
-267%
1.1
-22%
0.51
43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.4
3.3
-136%
2.9
-107%
5
-257%
4.2
-200%
1.85
-32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
2.4
-85%
2.2
-69%
2.4
-85%
2.1
-62%
0.6
54%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.24 98%
2.25 98%
1.97 112%
2.24 98%
2.191 100%
CCT
6413 101%
6920 94%
6622 98%
6635 98%
6584 99%
1355 480%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 18.52 %

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列 (最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

我们使用照片光谱仪和卡尔曼分析软件来检查色彩的准确性。我们在正常色彩模式下使用标准色温预设值获得最佳效果。色彩和灰度表现的偏差都在目标范围内（<3），而且一般都很低。

色彩精确度（配置文件：正常、标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩精确度（配置文件：正常、标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：正常、标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：正常、标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：正常，标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：正常，标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：正常，标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：正常，标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.699 ms rise
↘ 0.709 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6555 ms rise
↘ 1.349 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

对于户外使用，Honor 200 Pro 有足够的亮度储备，即使在晴天也能轻松阅读。不过，手动亮度控制（630 cd/m²）下显示屏上的反光会导致可读性问题。可视角度的稳定性令人满意。

性能 -Honor 200 Pro（配备高通 SoC

Honor 200 Pro 基于 骁龙 8s Gen 3 - 强大的芯片组，由于采用了 Cortex-X4 内核，其单核性能几乎与 骁龙 8 代 3.

由于时钟频率较低（3.0 GHz），Honor 智能手机比 OnePlus 12 落后约 15%。 一加 12旗舰 SoC 的 15%。不过，在 Geekbench 多核测试中，两款手机的差距为 30%。在系统基准测试（Antutu、CrossMark）中，与搭载骁龙 8 代 3 的竞争对手的差距更大。

关于骁龙 8s Gen 3 与骁龙 8 系列其他 SoC 规格的全面比较，请参阅我们的 另一篇文章.

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points +25%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2148 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
2012 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1821 - 2012, n=6)
1916 Points +5%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1821 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1653 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points +49%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6630 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points +40%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
5284 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (4602 - 5284, n=6)
4906 Points +7%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4225 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -9%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points +19%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1672 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1451 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1329 - 1498, n=6)
1436 Points +2%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1413 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1260 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -27%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points +55%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6088 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points +34%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4746 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (3980 - 4746, n=6)
4318 Points +4%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4155 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -17%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3395 Points -18%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2005881 Points +51%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1905751 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points +22%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1553057 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1142944 - 1553057, n=6)
1414338 Points +6%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1329696 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1107295 Points -17%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17763 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
17200 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (15547 - 19083, n=6)
17045 Points +6%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
16008 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15876 Points -1%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15690 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -18%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
10897 Points -32%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1304 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points +13%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1167 Points +5%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1112 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (771 - 1155, n=6)
961 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
955 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
820 Points -26%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10522 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9287 Points +10%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8433 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5685 - 9147, n=6)
7738 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
7565 Points -10%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
6974 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -23%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
System
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14531 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14406 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
13391 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (9875 - 13391, n=6)
12187 Points +8%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
11299 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -8%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8251 Points -27%
Memory
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
11357 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
10193 Points +17%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9115 Points +5%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8722 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5456 - 10977, n=6)
7838 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
6131 Points -30%
Graphics
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
38959 Points +34%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
29006 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26783 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
23009 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (8020 - 29006, n=6)
22941 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18975 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -38%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1908 Points +10%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1907 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1534 - 1893, n=6)
1744 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1734 Points 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1734 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1657 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -9%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
25563 Points +88%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18127 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +31%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16988 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (13576 - 15572, n=5)
14536 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
14075 Points +4%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13576 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11574 Points -15%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +2157%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1473 Points +31%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1321 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (946 - 1321, n=6)
1161 Points +3%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1136 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points +1%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1122 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1263 Points +124%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1051 Points +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (564 - 1051, n=5)
878 Points +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points +46%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
564 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1445 Points +49%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
967 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
843 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (414 - 967, n=5)
773 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points -23%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
955 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
663 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (273 - 955, n=5)
577 Points -40%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
513 Points -46%

根据制造商的说法，安装的 Adreno 735Honor 200 Pro 中安装的是 Adreno 740来自 骁龙 8 第二代提高了能效。不过，与 Adreno 750 相比，Honor 智能手机的能效有时会低于 95%。 Adreno 750.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4331 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points +28%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3332 Points +8%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3076 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2439 Points -21%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4444 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points +28%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3424 Points +12%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3056 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -21%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17681 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points +5%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12004 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8977 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8635 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8237 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points +28%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5045 Points -3%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8017 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points +30%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5145 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
4886 Points -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
543 fps +19%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
539 fps +18%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
455 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -11%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
380 fps -16%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
317 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +95%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps +30%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
362 fps +34%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps +7%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
234 fps -13%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -64%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps +68%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +8%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps +57%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +25%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
149 fps -13%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +75%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +47%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +2%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -3%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +61%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
147 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps +32%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps -19%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +106%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps +49%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +18%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +10%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps +10%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps +93%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +77%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +57%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps +5%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -16%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +97%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +82%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +38%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +25%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps +88%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +38%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps +23%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -11%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps +95%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +75%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +60%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -20%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1598 Points +50%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1065 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1030 Points -3%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1667 Points +58%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1073 Points +2%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
235.397 Points +295%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
215.5 Points +261%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
162.564 Points +172%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=6)
154.2 Points +158%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points +116%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +108%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
104.25 Points +75%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
59.665 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
289 runs/min +339%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min +305%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
243 runs/min +269%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (65.9 - 247, n=6)
182 runs/min +176%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +118%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
141 runs/min +114%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
136 runs/min +106%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
65.9 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
212 Points +248%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
185 Points +203%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
181 Points +197%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points +189%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=6)
144.8 Points +137%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +92%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
94 Points +54%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
61 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
68223 Points +139%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
66369 Points +133%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points +123%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
54365 Points +91%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
47776 Points +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=6)
45299 Points +59%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +35%
Honor 200 Pro
28536 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -5%
Honor 200 Pro
1456.4 ms *
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
998 ms * +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=6)
910 ms * +38%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
801.6 ms * +45%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
700.9 ms * +52%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * +55%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
624.1 ms * +57%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 200 ProOnePlus 12Samsung Galaxy S24Google Pixel 8Motorola Edge 50 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
81%
16%
-29%
68%
62%
-5%
Sequential Read 256KB
1992.32
3297.57
66%
3701.23
86%
1655.48
-17%
3926.6
97%
3625 ?(1851 - 4512, n=36)
82%
1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
-5%
Sequential Write 256KB
1644.98
3246.21
97%
1435.39
-13%
895.86
-46%
3558.6
116%
3001 ?(1524 - 3889, n=36)
82%
1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
-11%
Random Read 4KB
276.23
438.5
59%
373.12
35%
183.55
-34%
349.1
26%
386 ?(250 - 480, n=36)
40%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
1%
Random Write 4KB
321.09
652.8
103%
175.98
-45%
266.68
-17%
430.6
34%
467 ?(45.7 - 709, n=36)
45%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
-3%

游戏 -Honor 手机只能达到 60 fps

Honor 200 Pro 可以很好地运行 PlayStore 上的所有游戏，但 GFXBench 的屏幕数值却让人对 HFR 游戏不抱什么希望。遗憾的是，我们使用应用程序进行的 FPS 测量也证实了这一点。.120 Hz 的高级手机不可能达到 60 帧以上。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Honor 200 Pro; Dead Trigger 2: Ø60.2 (58-61)
Honor 200 Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø59.7 (49-61)
Honor 200 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (48-61)
Honor 200 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.4 (57-61)
Honor 200 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.6 (36-41)

排放 -Honor 200 Pro 大幅度节流

温度

在负载情况下，机箱表面温度较高。我们使用 3DMark 压力测试来检查内部的热量发展情况。在这里 高通 SoC在计算密集型负载下显示出较高的帧速率波动。

Max. Load
 45.7 °C46.2 °C40.8 °C 
 46.2 °C46 °C41.9 °C 
 46.3 °C43.7 °C39.1 °C 
Maximum: 46.3 °C
Average: 44 °C
39.8 °C41.6 °C41.8 °C
38.4 °C41.7 °C43.2 °C
37.6 °C40.4 °C42.9 °C
Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 40.8 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.4 % +56%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.3 % +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % +41%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 % +22%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.4 % +54%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 % +49%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.1 % +36%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % +8%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.4 % +39%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % +14%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.8 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.1 % +51%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.3 % +22%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.4 %
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø15.1 (9.82-18.5)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-28.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.9 (14.7-25.8)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.7 (11.3-14.4)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.8 (13.2-18.3)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø53.5 (36.8-68.9)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84 (79.2-101.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73 (66.2-87.7)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.6 (43.2-51.8)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø62.3 (49.5-76.2)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56 (36.8-66.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (62-85.7)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (43.5-53.7)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (43.5-53.7)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.9 (9.75-15.8)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.9 (9.75-15.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.8 (16.9-29.8)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14.6 (8.53-16.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.3 (16.7-28.9)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13 (11.5-16.3)
Honor 200 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.14 (4.65-7.96)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø11.3 (11-12.5)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø5.76 (5.25-7.36)

发言人

Honor 200 Pro 的两个扬声器提供了良好的音质和轻快的低音，尽管超高音调略显不足。耳机可通过 USB 端口连接。喜欢使用无线输出的用户可以使用蓝牙 5.3 标准。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.240.62531.834.33118.237.54023.438.75032.436.46319.439.88018.841.310017.638.412513.844.916015.955.72001655.525016.459.231515.15940013.860.250012.967.563013.870.180013.574.4100013.175.3125013.876.7160012.57720001382.3250013.280.3315014.581400013.485.150001481630015.279.380001579.31000013.677.21250017771600015.571.3SPL2691.9N0.788.7median 13.8median 76.7Delta1935.936.229.730.627.627.529.730.833.840.122.824.518.325.919.23115.933.91538.417.341.614.841.712.247.613.254.414.661.913.564.815.561.415.565.216.967.912.871.312.371.812.167.113.467.81578.314.274.714.472.515.468.615.967.316.870.717.35626.683.60.852.3median 15median 65.21.610.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 200 ProMotorola Edge 50 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 200 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 -Honor 智能手机充电迅速

耗电量

电池容量为 5,200 毫安时，最大充电功率为 100 瓦。在我们的测试中，Honor 200 Pro 仍然需要近四分之三小时（44 分钟）才能充满电。无线充电的最大功率为 66 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.11 / 2.67 / 2.75 Watt
Load midlight 8.13 / 8.64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh		OnePlus 12
5400 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh		Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
4500 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
25%
1%
33%
27%
-6%
23%
Idle Minimum *
1.11
1.3
-17%
0.89
20%
0.42
62%
0.56
50%
0.9
19%
1.353 ?(0.7 - 3.6, n=6)
-22%
0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
21%
Idle Average *
2.67
0.95
64%
1.05
61%
0.93
65%
1.08
60%
1.2
55%
2.29 ?(1.09 - 6.52, n=6)
14%
1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
46%
Idle Maximum *
2.75
1.12
59%
1.11
60%
1.07
61%
1.17
57%
1.4
49%
2.42 ?(1.16 - 6.54, n=6)
12%
1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
42%
Load Average *
8.13
10.55
-30%
9.03
-11%
15.43
-90%
8.01
1%
6.5
20%
8.5 ?(6.5 - 10.6, n=6)
-5%
6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years)
19%
Load Maximum *
8.64
11.72
-36%
9.06
-5%
16.51
-91%
8.89
-3%
9.2
-6%
11.1 ?(8.64 - 13.8, n=6)
-28%
9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years)
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.41 (0.99-10.4)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.32 (0.958-9.2)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.414 (1.33-1.67)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.103 (1.044-1.199)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.69 (7.88-8.74)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.33 (6.59-8.85)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.414 (1.33-1.67)
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.103 (1.044-1.199)

电池寿命

电池续航时间非常吸引人。Honor 200 Pro 的 WLAN 电池测试时间约为 16.5 小时，在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的情况下可持续很长时间。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 125)
16h 33min
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh		OnePlus 12
5400 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh		Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
993
1237
25%
897
-10%
880
-11%
814
-18%
953
-4%

Pros

+ 非常明亮的显示屏
+ 120 Hz 面板，校准精确
+ 运行时间长

Cons

- 触觉（就价格范围而言）
- 不防水
- 无 WiFi 7
- 废热高
- 超广角摄像头较差
- 只有单频 GNSS
- USB 2.0

判决

回顾 Honor 200 Pro。测试设备由Honor 德国提供。
回顾 Honor 200 Pro。测试设备由Honor 德国提供。

Honor 200 Pro 在测试中给我们留下了复杂的感觉。这款高档手机外观时尚，显示屏边缘非常窄，但唯一的防溅外壳给人的感觉却像是一款相当廉价的中端机型。内置处理器非常强大，但低效的散热和严重的系统节流破坏了高性能的 高通 SoC.

Honor 200 Pro 并不总能跻身高端产品行列。

OLED 面板无可挑剔，在日常使用中很好地兑现了规格表中的承诺。超过 4000 尼特的亮度、出色的校准和高刷新率让显示器发烧友欣喜若狂。不过，在设备方面，作为一款高端设备，它还存在许多较小的不足（没有 WiFi 7、没有 USB 3.2、没有双频或三频 GNSS......）。

智能手机市场在这一价格范围内提供了一些有趣的替代产品 (三星Galaxy S24, 谷歌 Pixel 8, 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Ultra).如果你不怕进口，还应该看看 小米 14 Pro.

价格和供应情况

Honor 200 Pro 的零售价为 800 欧元（869 美元），可直接从制造商处购买。.

注：我们已经更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里.

Honor 200 Pro - 07/25/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
46 / 69 → 67%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
28 / 55 → 50%
Application Performance
65 / 85 → 77%
AI Performance
37%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Camera
76%
Average
63%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
97.5%
Repairability
35%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 42.9%

More articles related to this device

Honor 200 Pro (200 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor 200 Pro 评测--配备 2D 人脸识别功能的高端智能手机能否克服自身不足？
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-07-30 (Update: 2024-07-30)