OnePlus 12 5G 智能手机评测：接近Galaxy S24 Ultra 的旗舰体验，价格仅为一半

Name: OnePlus 12
Brand: OnePlus

超值旗舰演奏家 搭载高通骁龙 8 代 3 处理器的 OnePlus 12 5G 在很多方面都做得很好，提供的功能与 2024 年迄今为止我们看到的其他Android 旗舰大致相当。虽然 OnePlus 12 可能是目前最超值的 8 代 3 旗舰，但某些关键方面似乎被忽略了。

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 👁 Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/26/2024 🇺🇸 🇸🇪 ...

OnePlus 5G ARM Android Smartphone

OnePlus 从不放过抓住高通公司最新、最棒产品的机会，新款 OnePlus 12 5G 也不例外。从本质上讲，OnePlus 12 本质上是一款 OPPO Find X7 Ultra在电池和摄像头方面有所变化。

除了明显优于高通骁龙 8 代 3相比，OnePlus 12 5G 还带来了许多值得关注的升级。一加 11 5G例如更亮的显示屏、配备全新 6400 万像素潜望镜镜头的第四代哈苏摄像头、可拍摄 4K30 视频的 3200 万像素自拍摄像头、USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口、更大的 5400 毫安时电池，以及全新的 24 GB / 1 TB 存储选项。

我们的测试机配备 16 GB LPDDR5X 内存和 512 GB UFS 4.0 存储空间，折扣前售价为 69,999 镑（1,099 欧元或 899.99 美元）。基本的 12 GB / 256 GB 版本折扣前价格为 64,999 ₹（949 欧元或 799.99 美元）。OnePlus 还提供 24 GB / 1 TB 版本，但目前尚未在印度上市。

Test device courtesy of OnePlus

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

OnePlus 12 (12 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 750

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.82 inch 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 510 PPI, Capacitive, ProXDR LTPO AMOLED, 10-bit ProXDR with LTPO, HBM/Peak brightness: 1600 / 4500 nits, Always-on display, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB

, 482 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Flick-detect, 13-channel Accu-spectrum light color identifier, Sensor Core, OTG

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, DSDA, GSM: Bands 850/900/1800MHz, CDMA: Band BC0, WCDMA: Bands 1/4/5/8, LTE FDD: Bands 1/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28A/66, LTE TDD: Bands 34/38/39/40/41, 5G NR: n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28A/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78/n66, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.2 x 164.3 x 75.8

Battery

5400 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Dual-cell (2,700 mAh), Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 19 h

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix Sony LYT-808 Wide (f/1.6, 1/1.4", 1.12 µm, 23 mm, 7P Lens, OIS/EIS) + 64 MP OmniVision OV64B Periscope Telephoto (3x optical zoom, 6x in-sensor zoom, f/2.6, 1/2", 0.7 µm, 70 mm (3x), 140 mm (6x), 33°, 4P Lens, EIS/OIS) + 48 MP Ultra-wide (f/2.2, 1/2", 0.8 µm, 14 mm, 114°, 6P Lens, EIS)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix Sony IMX615 (f/2.4, 0.8 µm, 1/2.74", 21 mm, 90°, 5P Lens, EIS)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: OnScreen, Protective case, 100 W SuperVOOC Power Adapter, USB Type-A to Type-C cable, Pre-applied screen protector, SIM tray ejector, OxygenOS 14, 12 Months Warranty, SAR (India): 1.18 W/Kg (Head); 0.68 W/Kg (Body), Camera2 API: LEVEL_3, IP65, fanless

Weight

220 g, Power Supply: 165 g

Price

921 EUR

Links

OnePlus homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.1 %	06/2024	OnePlus 12 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750	220 g	9.2 mm	6.82"	3168x1440
89.8 %	01/2024	Xiaomi 14 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750	193 g	8.2 mm	6.36"	2670x1200
91.1 %	05/2024	Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750	232 g	8.6 mm	6.80"	3120x1440
90.6 %	04/2024	Oppo Find X7 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750	221 g	9.5 mm	6.82"	3168x1440
89 %	12/2023	Google Pixel 8 Pro Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7	213 g	8.8 mm	6.70"	2992x1344
88.5 %	03/2024	Vivo X100 Pro Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12	221 g	9.05 mm	6.78"	2800x1260
91.1 %	12/2023	Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU	221 g	8.25 mm	6.70"	2796x1290

构造IP65 结构，配备大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2

OnePlus 提供三种颜色的 12 5G：丝滑黑（我们的机型）、流光翠绿和冰川白。冰川白采用光面背板，而其他两种颜色则采用磨砂磨砂表面处理，但触摸起来仍然相当滑手。

圆形摄像头驼峰是该机最突出的设计特点。它的设计灵感来自奢华手表，比 OnePlus 11 更大，可能是为了容纳 3 倍潜望镜镜头。

OnePlus 仍然使用康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 保护的曲面显示屏，不过与 OnePlus 7 Pro 相比，弧度要小得多。一加 7 Pro的弧度要小得多。220 克的重量分布合理，操作手机时与手持 Find X7 Ultra 或 vivo X100 Pro.

OnePlus 12 的 IP65 防护等级低于 Find X7 Ultra 的 IP68 防护等级，因此不要指望带着手机去游泳。尽管如此，这款手机仍能经受偶尔的一两次水溅。

尺寸比较

硬件：红外热像仪惊艳亮相

OnePlus 12 5G 恢复了以下功能一加 10 Pro和 OnePlus 11 所缺乏的功能 - 50 W AirVOOC 无线充电和 USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口。与 OnePlus 11 不同的是，现在所有存储版本都提供 UFS 4.0 存储。

长期使用 OnePlus 11 的用户会注意到，具有特色的警报滑块现在位于设备的左侧。有趣的是，我们这次还看到了红外爆破器--这种功能通常只出现在中端产品中，如 Nord 3.

由于没有 microSD 读卡器，因此您必须根据自己的需要选择足够大的内置存储选项。

底部：扬声器格栅、USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C、麦克风、SIM 卡托盘

软件：OxygenOS 14，包含四年的主要更新和五年的补丁程序

OnePlus 12 5G 运行的是 OxygenOS 14.0，它基于Android 14 构建，只是 ColorOS 在国际市场上的一个变种。不过，OnePlus 的实现并不包括 UI 广告或任何肆意的第三方应用程序。

预装的应用程序只有 OnePlus 自己的实用工具和 Netflix，以及几个 ColorOS 应用程序，如 Zen Space 和 O Relax。

长期使用 OxygenOS（和 ColorOS）的用户会有宾至如归的感觉。12 还从开放的 OxygenOS 14.0 中获得了一些功能，如智能侧边栏中的文件底座和最近文件文件夹。

该公司表示https://community.oneplus.com/thread/1211291251581124608四年的操作系统更新周期和五年的安全补丁。到目前为止，OnePlus 的 OTA 更新非常有规律，测试时的最新版本基于 2024 年 5 月的安全补丁。

通信和全球导航卫星系统：Wi-Fi 吞吐量快，导航精度不高

OnePlus 12 支持 Wi-Fi 7，但印度版仅启用了 Wi-Fi 5。也许可以通过具有 root 权限的 adb 强制启用 Wi-Fi 6E。

尽管如此，Wi-Fi 5 的吞吐量非常出色，平均接收速度达到了 1.86 Gbps。小米小米 14在传输测试中遥遥领先。

与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行测试时，Wi-Fi 吞吐量相对稳定，测试距离为 1 米，视线清晰。

Networking: iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | iperf3 receive AXE11000

Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 14 Wi-Fi 7	1716 (1119^min - 1807^max) MBit/s +53%
OnePlus 12 Wi-Fi 7	1119 (1086^min - 1176^max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7 (556 - 1801, n=29)	1059 MBit/s -5%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Wi-Fi 7	950 (484^min - 1003^max) MBit/s -15%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Wi-Fi 6E	931 (893^min - 949^max) MBit/s -17%
Vivo X100 Pro Wi-Fi 7	915 (772^min - 967^max) MBit/s -18%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Wi-Fi 7	892 (333^min - 944^max) MBit/s -20%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=198, last 2 years)	696 MBit/s -38%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Wi-Fi 7	556 (253^min - 611^max) MBit/s -50%

Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 12 Wi-Fi 7	1857 (1766^min - 1917^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 14 Wi-Fi 7	1623 (1502^min - 1707^max) MBit/s -13%
Average Wi-Fi 7 (693 - 1875, n=29)	1069 MBit/s -42%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Wi-Fi 7	967 (890^min - 984^max) MBit/s -48%
Vivo X100 Pro Wi-Fi 7	929 (862^min - 945^max) MBit/s -50%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Wi-Fi 7	897 (870^min - 916^max) MBit/s -52%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Wi-Fi 6E	810 (793^min - 818^max) MBit/s -56%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Wi-Fi 7	801 (397^min - 819^max) MBit/s -57%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=197, last 2 years)	671 MBit/s -64%

OnePlus 12 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (1086-1176)

Xiaomi 14 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1716 (1119-1807)

OnePlus 12 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1857 (1766-1917)

Xiaomi 14 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1622 (1502-1707)

OnePlus 12 5G 支持 L1+L5 双频 GPS 以及一系列全球导航卫星系统 (GNSS)，包括 GLONASS (L1)、Galileo (E1+E5a)、BeiDou (B1+B2a+B1C)、A-GPS、QZSS (L1+L5) 和 NavIC (IRNSS L5)。此外，还支持 EGNOS 和 GAGAN SBAS 系统。

尽管如此，OnePlus 12 的 GPS 并不是我们见过的最精确的。在路上导航时，手机往往会穿过建筑物。

iPhone 15 Pro Apple iPhone 15 Pro和 OnePlus 12 在建筑物密集的地区都很吃力，但 iPhone 15 Pro 在道路导航方面通常表现更好。GPS 在室内难以快速锁定。

GNSS 对比：Apple iPhone 15 Pro vs. OnePlus 12 5G

电话和通话质量：印度无 eSIM，美国无 DSDA

OnePlus 12 在 Jio True5G 网络上的通话质量非常好。听筒和扬声器在高音量下都能清晰地听到对方的声音，没有明显的失真。支持 VoNR 或 Vo5G，但目前必须在开发者设置中启用。如果运营商尚未通过 5G SA 网络提供 VoNR，手机会自动切换到 LTE 进行语音通话。

Google Phone 是默认的手机应用。该应用支持本机通话录音，并向通话各方发出通知。

SIM 卡托盘可容纳两张 nano-SIM 卡。eSIM 的可用性仅限于欧洲和北美，不包括印度，尽管该地区的运营商支持 eSIM。虽然可以存储多个 eSIM 配置文件，但一次只能使用一个 eSIM。

目前还不清楚 OnePlus 是否会考虑通过软件更新来支持 eSIM。即使是 OnePlus 11，该公司最初也宣传支持 eSIM，但后来又撤回了。奇怪的是，与 11 使用相同 SoC 调制解调器组合的 OnePlus Open 却在印度支持 eSIM。OnePlus 在这方面的沟通失误相当令人担忧。

美国版本支持 eSIM，但缺少双 SIM 卡双激活（DSDA）功能，这可能会影响到需要同时激活 SIM 卡的用户。

相机：50 MP 索尼 LYT-808 拍摄效果极佳

OnePlus 12 现在配备了 3200 万像素索尼 IMX615 自拍摄像头，是 11 5G 的 1600 万像素传感器的升级版。12 的自拍摄像头采用与 11 相同的 f/2.4 光圈，但像素尺寸减小到 0.8 微米。

此外，前置摄像头现在使用更宽的 21 毫米焦距，覆盖 90° 角。该摄像头的视频速度上限为 30 fps，分辨率为 720p、1080p 和 4K。

自拍非常实用，但质量与我们之前看到的 OnePlus 11 并无太大区别。色彩似乎有点暗淡，但细节还原得很好。不过，100% 的裁剪会损失一些背景细节。

人像自拍效果很好，相机能很好地将头发从背景中分离出来，而不会掩盖细节。

相机应用程序的界面与以前一样熟悉，唯一不同的是专业模式现在更名为哈苏大师。

与 Find X7 Ultra 拥有的 5000 万像素四传感器阵列不同，OnePlus 12 采用的三摄像头设置主要继承自 OnePlus Open。Open 和 12 都采用了堆叠式索尼 LYT-808 主传感器。不过，Open 使用的是略小的 1/1.43" 4800 万像素 24 毫米镜头，而 12 5G 使用的是 1/1.4" 5000 万像素 23 毫米等效镜头。

广受欢迎的 XPan 模式再次亮相。XPan 模式模拟哈苏 XPan 相机 65:24 的宽高比。相机应用程序允许以 14 毫米、23 毫米、70 毫米等值拍摄单色和彩色 XPan 照片。

OnePlus 12 的日光拍摄效果令人印象深刻，没有噪点，色调自然。其拍摄效果可与Apple iPhone 15 Pro、Google Pixel 8 Pro 或SamsungGalaxy S24 Ultra 相媲美。照片可以 HDR 模式拍摄，并在照片应用程序的 ProXDR 模式（ColorOS 对Android 14 的 Ultra HDR 的描述）上查看，或在 Instagram 等支持的社交媒体平台上共享。

无论是原生 3 倍光学变焦还是 6 倍传感器内裁剪，长焦镜头的质量都给我们留下了特别深刻的印象。即使是 10 倍裁剪，在光线良好的情况下，照片的可用性仍然很高。广角镜头和长焦镜头都支持自动微距拍摄。

弱光下的表现也值得称赞，主摄像头和 3 倍远摄镜头都能拍出鲜艳的色彩。弱光条件下的噪点水平与

Galaxy S24 Ultra 相当，明显低于 Pixel 8 Pro 和 iPhone 15 Pro。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main Camera 2x Zoom 3x Zoom Ultra-wide 0.6x Low light

click to load images

OnePlus 12 5G

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

OnePlus 12 5G

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

OnePlus 12 5G

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

OnePlus 12 5G

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

OnePlus 12 5G

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

使用 ColorChecker Passport 进行验证时，OnePlus 12 的主摄像头在良好的环境光线下显示出相当准确的色彩还原，尤其是肤色。测试图细节清晰，没有明显噪点。

在 1 勒克斯条件下，相机默认为 1.5 秒长时间曝光。虽然测试图中的细节清晰度基本不受影响，但仍可观察到明显的色彩偏差。

配件和保修：随附 100 W SuperVOOC 充电器和包装盒

包装盒中包括一个 100 W SuperVOOC 充电器、USB Type-A 转 Type-C 连接线和 Red Cable Club 会员资格。

OnePlus 12 5G 印度版随机附送保护壳、SIM 卡弹出工具、红缆俱乐部卡、品牌贴纸、手机孔封贴纸、100 W SuperVOOC 电源适配器、用于电源和数据传输的 USB Type-A 转 Type-C 数据线、欢迎词和其他文件。

国际机型不提供保护套。在某些地区，电源适配器也可能被没收。

OnePlus 为在印度销售的手机提供标准的一年保修服务。购买者还可以选择多种保修延期和意外损坏保护计划，从 99 镑起的一年延期，一直到 5999 镑的 OnePlus Care 计划（包括一年保修延期和两年意外保护）。

输入设备和操作：湿手使用 Aqua Touch

与Galaxy S24 Ultra 中的超声波指纹识别器不同，OnePlus 继续提供光学指纹识别器。尽管如此，该指纹识别器速度很快，而且验证没有太多延迟。如果需要，你还可以设置安全性较低的 2D 面部解锁。

OPPO 的 O-Haptics 功能也包括在内，可提供自然的触觉反馈，用户可对其进行微调。

OnePlus 不再宣传屏幕的触控响应速度，但声称通过 "HyperTouch "技术提高了触控精度。

该公司称，其新的 Aqua Touch 技术可以帮助你使用湿润的显示屏。我们试了一下，但根据屏幕或手的潮湿程度，可能会有一定的误差。

显示屏120 Hz ProXDR LTPO AMOLED，具有高直流调光功能

OnePlus 12 采用 2K 120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 显示屏，可根据显示内容在 1 Hz 到 120 Hz 之间刷新。

一个很好的功能是可以设置应用程序特定的 60 Hz、90 Hz 和 120 Hz 刷新率。不过，它可能不适用于所有应用程序，例如，即使刷新率设置为 120 Hz，谷歌地图也只能以 60 Hz 运行。

显示屏支持 HDR10+、HDRVivid 和杜比视界。你甚至可以用主摄像头录制杜比视界 HDR 视频，并在智能手机上欣赏完整的视频。

OnePlus 在高亮度模式（HBM）下将显示屏的峰值亮度评定为 1,600 尼特，而在播放 HDR 内容时则达到了惊人的 4,500 尼特。在我们的测试中，环境光传感器可以将 HBM 的峰值亮度提升到 1,028 尼特。在 APL 10 下进行 HDR 播放时，测得的峰值亮度为 1,418 尼特。

OnePlus 炫目的峰值亮度可能来自极低的 APL 或甚至单个像素。如此高的峰值亮度数据只能作为市场营销的炫耀，在实际使用中是无法达到的。


932 cd/m²	991 cd/m²	976 cd/m²
935 cd/m²	1026 cd/m²	1000 cd/m²
1026 cd/m²	1006 cd/m²	1028 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3

Maximum: 1028 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 991.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 546 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.98
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

	OnePlus 12 AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.82	Xiaomi 14 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73	Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.80	Oppo Find X7 Ultra AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.82	Google Pixel 8 Pro OLED, 2992x1344, 6.70	Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Super Retina XDR Display, OLED, 2796x1290, 6.70	Vivo X100 Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.78
Response Times		17%	37%	-60%	3%	45%	113%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	1.01 ?(0.54, 0.47)	1.36 ?(0.6685, 0.694) -35%	3.8 ?(1.76, 2.046) -276%	3.49 ?(1.196, 2.292) -246%	1.85 ?(1.024, 0.822) -83%	1.58 ?(0.876, 0.7045) -56%	0.61 ?(0.3075, 0.303) 40%
Response Time Black / White *	11.6 ?(10, 1.6)	1.5 ?(0.766, 0.736) 87%	1.41 ?(0.771, 0.6435) 88%	1.08 ?(0.596, 0.483) 91%	1.07 ?(0.568, 0.504) 91%	0.88 ?(0.4485, 0.4285) 92%	1.17 ?(0.5905, 0.575) 90%
PWM Frequency	120	120.5 0%	480 300%	91 -24%	120 0%	240 100%	369 208%
Screen		6%	-31%	20%	20%	12%	40%
Brightness middle	1026	1025 0%	1317 28%	1131 10%	1510 47%	1102 7%	1392 36%
Brightness	991	1046 6%	1365 38%	1118 13%	1467 48%	1102 11%	1360 37%
Brightness Distribution	91	95 4%	94 3%	93 2%	92 1%	98 8%	84 -8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.19	1.1 8%	3.4 -186%	0.9 24%	1.1 8%	1.1 8%	0.6 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.3	2.9 12%	5 -52%	2.1 36%	3.8 -15%	3.1 6%	1.3 61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	2.2 8%	2.8 -17%	1.5 37%	1.7 29%	1.6 33%	0.9 62%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2 ^110%	2.25 ^98%	2.23 ^99%	2.19 ^100%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6920 ^94%	6622 ^98%	6458 ^101%	6495 ^100%	6670 ^97%	6555 ^99%	6540 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99.5
Total Average (Program / Settings)		12% / 10%	3% / -8%	-20% / -6%	12% / 14%	29% / 23%	77% / 64%

* ... smaller is better

自然模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

OnePlus 12 提供自然、专业和鲜艳色彩模式。所有模式下的 Delta E 2000 平均值都略高，因此开箱即用的色彩并不十分准确。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000：2.25。最大 dE2000：6.42

自然模式，暖色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

切换到暖色温后，灰度平均值和 ColorChecker Delta E 2000 值都有明显改善。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000：1.19。最大 dE2000：3.3

鲜艳模式，暖色温（色彩空间目标：DCI-P3）

鲜艳模式可增强色彩，但您需要将其更改为暖色温度，以提高灰度和 ColorChecker 的准确性。

OnePlus 声称 DCI-P3 覆盖率为 100%，但实测 2D DCI-P3 覆盖率为 95%。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000：2.34。最大 dE2000： 3.63

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.54 ms rise
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.47 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms).

对于这款 OLED 面板来说，响应时间符合预期。从 50% 灰过渡到 80% 灰仅需 1 毫秒，这使得 OnePlus 12 的显示屏非常适合快节奏的游戏。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 22.22 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17629 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

显示屏在亮度低于 30% 时使用 PWM。在 30% 以上的所有亮度下，我们测得的直流调光频率为 120 Hz。在设置中激活超级防闪烁功能后，直流调光频率会增加到 360 Hz。

如需了解更多信息，请参阅我们的文章"为什么 PWM 如此令人头痛"以及我们的 PWM 排名表来比较各评测设备的 PWM。

我们没有发现任何时间抖动的迹象。

最大亮度下的室外观看效果令人满意。可视角度非常稳定，即使在极端情况下也不会出现亮度或色彩损失。

性能：不是我们见过的最快的骁龙 8 代 3

OnePlus 12 5G 按惯例升级至高通骁龙 8 代 3.OnePlus 再次对 CPU 性能进行了默认节流。因此，除了电池测试外，我们在高性能模式下运行了所有基准测试。

有趣的是，与 OnePlus 11 5G 的 20% 相比，这次在 Geekbench 5 中开启与关闭高性能模式的差异不到 5%。

累计 CPU 性能与小米 14 和Galaxy S24 Ultra 的骁龙 8 代 3（Galaxy ）相当。

尽管如此，vivo X100 Pro 的MediaTek Dimensity 9300 在整体 CPU 基准测试中明显领先，尤其是在多核测试中。

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	88.4 pt
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	86.5 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	82.2 pt
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	79.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	79.5 pt
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	78.8 pt
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max ^-10! Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	75.7 pt
Google Pixel 8 Pro ^-5! Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	53 pt
Average of class Smartphone	49 pt

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1716 Points +3%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1699 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1684 Points +1%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1672 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1575 - 1702, n=11)	1672 Points 0%
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	1604 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1274 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=199, last 2 years)	924 Points -45%
Multi-Core
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	6681 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	6426 Points +6%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6307 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (5393 - 6543, n=11)	6102 Points 0%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	6088 Points
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	5977 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	3624 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=199, last 2 years)	3070 Points -50%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	2930 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	2287 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (2127 - 2329, n=14)	2224 Points +4%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2222 Points +3%
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	2207 Points +3%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2148 Points
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2144 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1769 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=120, last 2 years)	1374 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	7408 Points +12%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	7244 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	7102 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (6426 - 7501, n=14)	6925 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6914 Points +4%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	6756 Points +2%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	6630 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	4538 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=120, last 2 years)	3814 Points -42%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1468882 - 1650926, n=5)	1566955 Points +7%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1559772 Points +6%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1521387 Points +4%
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	1484501 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1473430 Points 0%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1468882 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	896410 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=137, last 2 years)	767134 Points -48%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2089591 Points +4%
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	2038807 Points +2%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2005881 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1624507 - 2162423, n=12)	2005575 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1980553 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1837994 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	1487075 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 2162423, n=62, last 2 years)	1196786 Points -40%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1113506 Points -44%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	18672 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (15343 - 21628, n=13)	18319 Points +17%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	17620 Points +12%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	16738 Points +7%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	15690 Points
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	14573 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 21385, n=198, last 2 years)	12000 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	11824 Points -25%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1443 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	1408 Points +8%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1304 Points
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	1301 Points 0%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1270 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1043 - 1474, n=9)	1235 Points -5%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1165 Points -11%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	935 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1474, n=157, last 2 years)	855 Points -34%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	11438 Points +9%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	10556 Points 0%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	10522 Points
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	10370 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8165 - 10966, n=11)	10224 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	9696 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=156, last 2 years)	5958 Points -43%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	16475 Points +13%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	15741 Points +8%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	14916 Points +3%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	14531 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8611 - 15935, n=11)	14198 Points -2%
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	12477 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=156, last 2 years)	9838 Points -32%
Memory
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	11357 Points
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	11309 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	11252 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8937 - 12716, n=11)	11017 Points -3%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	10882 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	10389 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=156, last 2 years)	6473 Points -43%
Graphics
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	58651 Points +51%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	38959 Points
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	38586 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (29938 - 39727, n=11)	35140 Points -10%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	31876 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	27905 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=156, last 2 years)	15125 Points -61%
Web
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	2068 Points +8%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2048 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1661 - 2145, n=11)	2005 Points +5%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1982 Points +4%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1907 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1815 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=156, last 2 years)	1528 Points -20%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	66541 Points +267%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	27018 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=143, last 2 years)	20989 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	18852 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	18370 Points +1%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	18163 Points 0%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	18127 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (13873 - 18370, n=11)	16950 Points -6%

AImark - Score v3.x
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	238544 Points +16094%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1381 - 245629, n=10)	97514 Points +6520%
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384	49660 Points +3271%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	29087 Points +1875%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 245629, n=113, last 2 years)	16292 Points +1006%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288	1518 Points +3%
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1473 Points
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1381 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1109 Points -25%

OnePlus 12 的 Adreno 750在 GPU 累计测试中落后于 Find X7 Ultra 6%。vivo X100 Pro 的 Immortalis-G720 MP12在大多数 3DMark 和 GFXBench 测试中都处于领先地位。

GPU Performance Rating: Percent
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

GPU Performance Rating
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	96.7 pt
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	93.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91.4 pt
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.9 pt
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76.9 pt
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max ^-3! A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	62.4 pt
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.6 pt

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5248 Points +21%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4876 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4804 Points +11%
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4729 Points +9%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4331 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	3879 Points -10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2410 Points -44%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5040 Points +13%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4853 Points +9%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4817 Points +8%
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4744 Points +7%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4444 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	3765 Points -15%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2422 Points -45%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	20068 Points +14%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	19459 Points +10%
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	19319 Points +9%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	17681 Points
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	17613 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	15260 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8922 Points -50%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7939 Points +8%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7922 Points +7%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7825 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7451 Points +1%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7385 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5044 Points -32%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	32662 Points +9%
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	32235 Points +7%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30100 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	29081 Points -3%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25785 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13743 Points -54%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	19187 Points +7%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	19153 Points +7%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	17879 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	17677 Points -1%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	17516 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9935 Points -44%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +102%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	791 fps +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	549 fps +2%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	539 fps
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	538 fps 0%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	535 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	444 fps -18%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	348 fps -35%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +102%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	339 fps +15%
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	331 fps +13%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	321 fps +9%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	294 fps
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	277 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	262 fps -11%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	174 fps -41%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +102%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	117 fps +95%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps +92%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	264 fps +14%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	253 fps +10%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	251 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	247 fps +7%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	231 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	180 fps -22%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps -52%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	110 fps +83%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83 fps +38%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	158 fps +7%
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	156 fps +6%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	148 fps +1%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	147 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	142 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	110 fps -25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -49%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	93 fps +55%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	86 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	72 fps +20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps +5%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	55 fps -8%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84 fps +8%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83 fps +6%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83 fps +6%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	61 fps -22%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -53%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +102%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	116 fps +93%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	114 fps +90%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91 fps +52%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	59 fps -2%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	208 fps +11%
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	207 fps +10%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	198 fps +5%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	188 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	187 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	117 fps -38%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps -48%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	40 fps +14%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	39 fps +11%
Xiaomi 14 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	38 fps +9%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	35 fps
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	33 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	25 fps -29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps -54%

Basemark GPUScore

OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø50 (13.5-111.2)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native: Ø48.3 (13.1-77.7)

OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø57.7 (16.3-92.9)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official: Ø56.7 (15.1-93.1)

OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø23.5 (15.5-72.2)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native: Ø14.6 (9.59-27.7)

OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø26 (15.8-68)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official: Ø18.2 (10.7-33.1)

尽管 CPU 总分略低，但 OnePlus 12 在使用默认 Chrome 浏览器进行的浏览器基准测试中却超越了竞争对手。

但是 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max(Safari Mobile 17）在浏览器基准测试中领先 OnePlus 12 21%。

Browser Performance Rating - Percent
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max ^-1!	93.8 pt
OnePlus 12	77.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra	75.9 pt
Xiaomi 14	75.2 pt
Vivo X100 Pro	68 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	59.7 pt
Oppo Find X7 Ultra	48.8 pt
Google Pixel 8 Pro	45.9 pt
Average of class Smartphone	31.5 pt

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)	254.048 Points +18%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)	215.569 Points 0%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)	215.5 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)	209.919 Points -3%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)	173.403 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.2 - 241, n=14)	162.4 Points -25%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)	144.545 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=163, last 2 years)	110.9 Points -49%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	105.175 Points -51%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)	445 runs/min +54%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)	289 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)	265 runs/min -8%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)	264 runs/min -9%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)	234 runs/min -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=12)	199.7 runs/min -31%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	158 runs/min -45%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)	154 runs/min -47%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=147, last 2 years)	116.2 runs/min -60%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)	212 Points
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)	196 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)	195 Points -8%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)	183 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (112 - 212, n=11)	163.6 Points -23%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)	134 Points -37%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	103 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=156, last 2 years)	102.8 Points -52%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)	86270 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)	72011 Points +6%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)	68454 Points 0%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)	68223 Points
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)	66656 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 70135, n=13)	53988 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	49506 Points -27%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)	47834 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=206, last 2 years)	34071 Points -50%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 10968, n=163, last 2 years)	1569 ms * -151%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra (Chrome 122.0.6261.119)	1039.2 ms * -67%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	840.2 ms * -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (624 - 1154, n=12)	785 ms * -26%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)	698.2 ms * -12%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)	624.1 ms *
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)	623.9 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)	599 ms * +4%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)	388.3 ms * +38%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 12 的 UFS 4.0 存储系统在顺序和随机读取方面的速度不如Galaxy S24 Ultra，但在写入性能方面，这款智能手机具有优势。

不过，Find X7 Ultra 和 X100 Pro 的 R/W 性能总体上要快 10%。

	OnePlus 12	Xiaomi 14	Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra	Oppo Find X7 Ultra	Google Pixel 8 Pro	Vivo X100 Pro	Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-5%	-26%	9%	-68%	10%	-6%	-54%
Sequential Read 256KB	3297.57	3385.74 3%	3610.25 9%	3965.08 20%	1501.13 -54%	3986.41 21%	3603 ?(1851 - 4512, n=21) 9%	1569 ?(226 - 4512, n=203, last 2 years) -52%
Sequential Write 256KB	3246.21	2906.65 -10%	1893.63 -42%	3590.55 11%	257.28 -92%	3461.77 7%	2989 ?(1524 - 3678, n=21) -8%	1184 ?(57.5 - 3875, n=203, last 2 years) -64%
Random Read 4KB	438.5	420.99 -4%	437.12 0%	449.73 3%	156.16 -64%	450.24 3%	414 ?(268 - 480, n=21) -6%	253 ?(22.2 - 543, n=203, last 2 years) -42%
Random Write 4KB	652.8	594.78 -9%	181.55 -72%	654.48 0%	258.92 -60%	709.25 9%	530 ?(174.3 - 709, n=21) -19%	281 ?(9.4 - 709, n=203, last 2 years) -57%

游戏：在 OxygenOS 上终于可以实现 120 帧/秒了

我们对 OnePlus 11 甚至是 OnePlus Pad是 OxygenOS 无法真正实现 120 fps 的游戏速度。OnePlus 似乎已经通过 OnePlus 12 上的 OxygenOS 14 解决了这个问题。

不过，我们只能在《PUBG Mobile》的最低设置下达到这一帧率。在超高清模式下玩《PUBGMobile》时，我们可以达到稳定的 40 帧/秒。

有趣的是，Genshin Impact在所有预设下都没有提供 120 fps 模式，尽管该游戏在兼容设备上支持该模式。所有游戏指标均通过GameBench Studio Pro 应用程序记录。

OnePlus 12; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.2.0: Ø115.6 (88-120)

OnePlus 12; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.2.0: Ø59.7 (54-61)

OnePlus 12; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.2.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

OnePlus 12; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø60.1 (51-61)

OnePlus 12; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø59.8 (53-61)

OnePlus 12; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø59.8 (56-61)

OxygenOS 还提供 HyperBoost 游戏引擎叠加功能，不仅可以显示帧频、延迟和 SoC 温度，还可以在低功耗、平衡和高性能模式之间进行选择。

其他功能还包括网络优化、触控优化、额外的 GPU AA 和自动对焦设置，以及完全禁用通话、UI 导航和后台数据的专用冠军模式。

排放：双低温高速汽化室在最大负荷下挣扎

温度

OnePlus 12 拥有总面积达 9,140^平方毫米的双低温高速气室，是 OnePlus 11 的近 2.5 倍。

尽管据称 OnePlus 12 的散热系统得到了增强，但我们发现在 3DMark Wild Life Stress 测试中，OnePlus 12 的运行速度下降了近 22%。最新的 Steel Nomad Light Stress 测试则宽松得多，但手机仍然显示出 12% 的节流。在 CPU 和 GPU 满载的情况下，手机表面温度也会变得很高。

这并不是说散热系统无效。用户在日常使用中不太可能让手机承受如此大的负载，因此日常操作应该不会有问题。

此外，如上图所示，我们在玩游戏时也没有感受到明显的节流现象。

Max. Load

Idle


45.8 °C	44.4 °C	40.8 °C
47.4 °C	44.8 °C	40.2 °C
48.4 °C	45.2 °C	41.2 °C

Maximum: 48.4 °C
Average: 44.2 °C


41.2 °C	40.6 °C	39.2 °C
39 °C	38.8 °C	38 °C
36.2 °C	38.4 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 38.7 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Test

3DMark: Wild Life Stress Test Stability | Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability

3DMark / Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	78.9 % +1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78.8 % +1%
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78.3 %
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.6 % -32%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.2 % -33%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	46.1 % -41%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.4 %
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 % -7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % -20%
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.3 % -27%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56.4 % -31%
Oppo Find X7 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 % -32%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.1 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76.6 % -13%

OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-28.2)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.3 (17.6-31.2)

OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84 (79.2-101.1)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø61 (47.5-102.9)

OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø11.3 (11-12.5)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.47 (9.01-11.8)

发言人

OnePlus 12 的听筒可用作扬声器，带来立体声效果。我们测得的响度接近 83 db(A)，对于一般大小的房间来说应该足够了。

虽然低音不足，但中高音还原得相当不错。

外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.4 连接。OnePlus 12 支持流行的蓝牙编解码器，包括 aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC、LHDC、AAC 和 SBC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

OnePlus 12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理：对于所提供的硬件，电源效率和电池续航时间尚可

耗电量

OnePlus 12 的耗电量比Galaxy S24 Ultra 低得多，但 vivo X100 Pro 和小米 14 则更加节俭。我们注意到空闲时的最低耗电量较高，这可能是由于低亮度下的高频 PWM 所造成的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.38 / 0.12 Watt
Idle	1.3 / 0.95 / 1.12 Watt
Load	10.55 / 11.72 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	OnePlus 12 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.82	Xiaomi 14 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, OLED, 2670x1200, 6.36	Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.80	Oppo Find X7 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.82	Google Pixel 8 Pro Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, OLED, 2992x1344, 6.70	Vivo X100 Pro Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.78	Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 256 GB NVMe, OLED, 2796x1290, 6.70	Average Qualcomm Adreno 750	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		24%	-20%	-16%	1%	14%	-9%	1%	2%
Idle Minimum *	1.3	0.51 61%	0.73 44%	1 23%	0.63 52%	0.46 65%	0.5 62%	0.854 ?(0.51 - 1.3, n=11) 34%	0.905 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=150, last 2 years) 30%
Idle Average *	0.95	0.89 6%	1.22 -28%	1.49 -57%	1.47 -55%	0.92 3%	1.97 -107%	1.175 ?(0.89 - 1.52, n=11) -24%	1.434 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=150, last 2 years) -51%
Idle Maximum *	1.12	0.92 18%	1.34 -20%	1.54 -38%	1.55 -38%	0.95 15%	1.99 -78%	1.27 ?(0.91 - 1.6, n=11) -13%	1.598 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=150, last 2 years) -43%
Load Average *	10.55	9.08 14%	16.52 -57%	11.4 -8%	8.45 20%	11.72 -11%	3.36 68%	10 ?(3.34 - 16.5, n=11) 5%	5.81 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=149, last 2 years) 45%
Load Maximum *	11.72	9.11 22%	16.58 -41%	11.63 1%	8.63 26%	11.79 -1%	10.43 11%	11.5 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=11) 2%	8.6 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=149, last 2 years) 27%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

OnePlus 12 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.66 (0.956-12.2)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.63 (0.966-16.1)

Vivo X100 Pro Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.17 (0.094-11.7)

OnePlus 12 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.846 (0.681-2.03)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)

Vivo X100 Pro Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.627 (0.53-1.356)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

OnePlus 12 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.45 (5.26-8.27)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.1 (9.83-15.6)

Vivo X100 Pro Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.7 (11.4-11.7)

OnePlus 12 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.846 (0.681-2.03)

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)

Vivo X100 Pro Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.627 (0.53-1.356)

电池寿命

OnePlus 12 的 5400 毫安时电池本身就令人印象深刻，但小米 14 和 iPhone 15 Pro Max 的电池容量更小，续航时间更长。

如果在 "设置 "中启用智能快速充电，随机附送的 100 瓦 SuperVOOC 充电器可在 26 分钟内充满 100% 的电池电量。

此外，OnePlus 12 还支持 50 W AirVOOC 无线充电，并为放置在其背面的兼容设备提供反向无线充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		32h 45min
WiFi Websurfing		20h 37min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		8h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		30h 20min

	OnePlus 12 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 5400 mAh	Xiaomi 14 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 4610 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X7 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 8 Pro Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 5050 mAh	Vivo X100 Pro Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 2700 mAh	Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 4422 mAh	Average of class Smartphone
Battery Runtime		10%	4%	5%	-36%	-9%	28%	-16%
Reader / Idle	1965	2926 49%	2227 13%	2282 16%	1344 -32%		3514 79%	2148 ?(951 - 14042, n=118, last 2 years) 9%
H.264	1820	1674 -8%	1922 6%	1897 4%	1122 -38%		2013 11%	1245 ?(856 - 2027, n=117, last 2 years) -32%
WiFi v1.3	1237	1092 -12%	1148 -7%	1186 -4%	760 -39%	1127 -9%	1163 -6%	931 ?(476 - 2844, n=212, last 2 years) -25%
Load		277	202	226	220		384	304 ?(73 - 462, n=116, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 配备大猩猩 Victus 2 玻璃显示屏，品质卓越

+ 无臃肿的 OxygenOS 14，四年功能更新

+ 快速的 Wi-Fi 5 吞吐量

+ 50 万像素索尼 LYT-808 和 3 倍长焦带来出色的拍摄效果

+ 摄像头和显示屏支持杜比视界录制和播放

Cons

- 只有 IP65 等级

- eSIM、Wi-Fi 6E 和 Wi-Fi 7 在印度无法使用

- GNSS 精度不达标

- SoC 性能未发挥到极致

- 尽管蒸发腔较大，但仍存在热节流现象

结论从旗舰杀手到正统旗舰

今年，OnePlus 使出浑身解数，以确保 OnePlus 12 5G 与其他手机相媲美。骁龙 8 代 3-旗舰机相媲美。

OnePlus 12 的手感恰到好处。我们的丝滑黑机型散发着高级的触感，突出的圆形摄像头模块上印有哈苏品牌标志，使其与其他机型区别开来。遗憾的是，它的防护等级仅为 IP65，这与它的表兄弟--Oppo Find X7 Ultra 的 IP68 防护等级不同。奥普 Find X7 Ultra.

在成像方面，OnePlus 12 的 5000 万像素索尼 LYT-808 传感器和 3 倍长焦可以与大多数 2024 旗舰相媲美，日间拍摄效果出色，弱光拍摄效果也非常好，细节得到保留，噪点大幅减少。与我们已经看到的 OnePlus 11 相比，自拍效果并没有大幅提升。一加 11，但至少前置摄像头现在支持 4K 30 视频。

OnePlus 12 集性能、美学、出色的摄像头和长期的软件支持于一身，没有高昂的价格标签，成功地将人们的注意力从更有追求的Apple 、三星、小米和谷歌产品中吸引了过来。"

120 Hz ProXDR LTPO AMOLED 显示屏并不是我们见过的色彩最准确的显示屏，但它提供了令人印象深刻的视觉效果，即使数字并不一定符合 OnePlus 炫目的峰值亮度要求。虽然竞争对手的续航时间更长一些，但它的耗电量还是比较经济的。100 瓦快速充电器也非常方便。

OnePlus 12 5G 也有不足之处。与竞争对手相比，这款手机的骁龙 8 代 3 SoC 在性能排行榜上并不突出，GNSS 精度有待提高，散热性也可能更好。此外，各地区的用户还需要做一些功课，了解自己所在地区支持哪些电话功能。2024 年在印度等地区不支持 eSIM 并不是一个好兆头。

总的来说，OnePlus 12 5G 的基本功能是正确的，绝对是小米 14 等手机的可行替代品。

小米 14和 vivo X100 Pro.这款手机几乎提供了小米 14 和 vivo X100 Pro 的所有功能。三星Galaxy S24 Ultra的一半。

与此同时，iQOO 12 的价格甚至低于 OnePlus 12，它提供几乎相同的功能集和 120 W 快速充电功能，售价仅为 59,990 ₹（670 欧元），但目前仅限于印度市场。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

OnePlus 12 5G 可直接从Oneplus.in 购买。12 GB + 256 GB 版本的起价为 64,999 ₹。亚马逊印度也提供 12 GB / 256 GB 版本，售价为 64,999 ₹，而 16 GB / 512 GB 版本售价为 69,999 ₹。这些优惠可与各种银行和返现优惠结合使用。

OnePlus 12 还可在美国亚马逊无锁购买，256 GB 和 512 GB 版本的售价分别为879.99 美元和899.99 美元。德国亚马逊的 256 GB 机型售价为867.25 欧元，512 GB 机型售价为921.10 欧元。

对于欧洲的用户，TradingShenzhen 有 12 GB / 256 GB 版本的现货，售价仅为607 欧元。其他型号包括 16 GB / 512 GB687 欧元、16 GB / 1 TB757 欧元和 24 GB / 1 TB857 欧元。

OnePlus 12 - 2024-07-02 07/02/2024 v8 ^(new)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

62 / 69 → 90%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

91%

Games Performance

46 / 55 → 83%

Application Performance

74 / 85 → 87%

AI Performance

62%

Temperature

86%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 90 → 92%

Camera

85%

Average

74%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
75%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
92.1%

Repairability
10%

Software Updates
85%

Total Sustainability Score: 60.4%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Vaidyanathan Subramaniam - Managing Editor - 1924 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @Geeky_Vaidy

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 407754 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > OnePlus 12 5G 智能手机评测：接近Galaxy S24 Ultra 的旗舰体验，价格仅为一半

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2024-06-26 (Update: 2024-06-26)

OnePlus 12 5G 智能手机评测：接近Galaxy S24 Ultra 的旗舰体验，价格仅为一半

潜在的竞争对手比较

构造IP65 结构，配备大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2

尺寸比较

硬件：红外热像仪惊艳亮相

软件：OxygenOS 14，包含四年的主要更新和五年的补丁程序

通信和全球导航卫星系统：Wi-Fi 吞吐量快，导航精度不高

电话和通话质量：印度无 eSIM，美国无 DSDA

相机：50 MP 索尼 LYT-808 拍摄效果极佳

配件和保修：随附 100 W SuperVOOC 充电器和包装盒

输入设备和操作：湿手使用 Aqua Touch

显示屏120 Hz ProXDR LTPO AMOLED，具有高直流调光功能

自然模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

自然模式，暖色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

鲜艳模式，暖色温（色彩空间目标：DCI-P3）

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能：不是我们见过的最快的骁龙 8 代 3

Basemark GPUScore

游戏：在 OxygenOS 上终于可以实现 120 帧/秒了

排放：双低温高速汽化室在最大负荷下挣扎

温度

3DMark Stress Test

发言人

OnePlus 12 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max audio analysis

能源管理：对于所提供的硬件，电源效率和电池续航时间尚可

耗电量

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论从旗舰杀手到正统旗舰

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison