Honor Magic6 Lite 评测:时尚 5G 智能手机,高端外观,经济实惠
Honor 的最新中档手机与其前代产品相似 前代但仍有许多改进--首先是采用了 高通骁龙 6 代 1取代了过时的 骁龙 695 5G 的 Magic5 Lite.此外,Magic6 Lite 还采用了全新的 108 MPix 摄像头和透光率更高的 f/1.75 镜头,以及 5300 mAh 大容量电池。
在定价方面,Honor 将其 Lite 机型归入中档,在欧洲的起价为 400 欧元。只有一种配置,8 GB 内存和 256 GB UFS 存储硬盘。利用内部的 Turbo 技术,内存可扩展至 8 GB。该技术通过使用 UFS 存储器的一部分来实现。但由于它比内存慢得多,因此只有在极少数情况下才会有好处。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.9 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Honor Magic6 Lite SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710 | 185 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" | 2652x1200 | |
82 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Honor Magic5 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 175 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
86.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Xiaomi Poco F5 SD 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725 | 181 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710 | 187 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2712x1220 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5 | 202 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | |
84.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3 | 170 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底盘:Magic6 Lite 配有人造革
尽管 Magic6 Lite 的电池容量很大,但仅 185 克的重量却相当轻。这款Honor 手机的屏占比高达 91%,看起来非常时尚和现代。比 Magic6 Lite 更小的边框在中端手机中是绝无仅有的。屏幕采用 Ultra Bounce 防跌落技术保护,增强了防跌落保护,提高了可靠性。最高 1.5 米的跌落,无论角度如何,都应该不成问题。Honor 没有透露这里使用的是哪种玻璃。
在背面,Magic6 Lite 采用了漂亮的表面处理:机身采用素食皮革或哑光塑料制成。在德国,有三种颜色可供选择:翡翠绿、午夜黑和日出橙(素食皮),其中橙色仅限Honor 在线商店销售。没有 IP 等级。
Magic6 Lite 外壳的做工不错,尽管没有我们希望的那么高级。我们的绿色测试样品没有廉价感,但玻璃后壳的手机在我们看来质量更高。机身部件之间的缝隙紧密而均匀。
连接性 -Honor Magic6 Lite,带 USB 2.0
对于一款 400 欧元的手机来说,Magic6 Lite 的连接选项绰绰有余。Honor 还说这款手机支持蓝牙 5.1,这很奇怪,因为骁龙 6 代 1 支持蓝牙 5.2。
与高级设备不同的是,USB 2.0 标准速度较慢,也不支持串联图片输出。在我们使用 M.2 固态硬盘(三星 980 Pro)进行的拷贝测试中,USB 端口只能达到非常慢的 22 MB/s。
UFS 3.1 内存容量为 256 GB,用户可使用 223 GB。令人失望的是,没有 512 GB 版本。无法通过 microSD 卡扩展内存。
软件 -Honor 电话Android 13
该设备的操作系统是不太新鲜的Android 13,带有 2023 年 11 月的安全更新。 在操作系统之上,Honor 采用了 Magic UI 7.2。计划升级到Android 14 及其前身,但没有更多。安全更新保证期为三年。这使Honor 落后于三星,因为韩国巨头更新了其 Galaxy A54 5G另一款中档手机 A54 5G 的更新期限为五年。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 的 Magic6 Lite
Magic6 Lite 仅支持 WiFi 5--遗憾的是,在这方面,Honor 中端产品仍处于停滞状态。使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,在 5 GHz 网络中的传输速率限制在 350 MBit/s,对于这种定价的手机来说并不算高。至少,无论接收还是发送数据,WiFi 性能都是一致的。
在移动数据方面,支持的频率有限。只有 13 个 LTE 频段可用--在这种情况下,覆盖了德国最重要的 4G 频段,而且还支持 5G。
Networking | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Magic6 Lite 支持大多数全球卫星网络,但只支持单频段。在中档手机中,像这样的妥协比比皆是,而对于Honor 手机来说,地理位置定位还是很精确的。
在骑车途中,我们将其地理定位功能与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。总体距离只少了 10 米,但在道路路线方面有一些小的规律性。Garmin 手表更加精确,但Honor 中端手机的导航功能仍然非常实用。
电话功能和语音质量 -Honor Magic6 Lite,双卡双待
Magic6 Lite 的语音捕捉质量很好,能很好地过滤背景噪音。这是一款双卡双待手机,可容纳两张实体 nanoSIM 卡,不支持 eSIM。但支持 VoLTE 和 WiFi 通话等功能。
摄像头 -Honor 智能手机,10800 万像素
主摄像头与 Magic5 Lite但自拍摄像头保持不变:1600 万像素摄像头采用 f/2.45 快门,位于中央孔位。自拍效果更加平滑,但质量与我们对这个价位的预期基本一致。
新的主摄像头采用 1/1.67 英寸规格的 10800 万像素传感器和 f/1.75 大快门,可获得比前代产品更好的照片。尽管如此,弱光拍摄并不是 Magic6 Lite 的强项,因为我们希望光线能更好,而且暗处的照片缺乏细节。没有光学防抖(OIS)功能。
在日光下,108 万像素的摄像头效果更好,图像清晰,但即使在这种情况下,画面也会变暗,削弱 Magic6 Lite 的图像效果。
Magic6 Lite 没有光学变焦功能。由于 108 MPix 摄像头的分辨率很高,因此可以使用高达 3 倍的数码变焦。当然,传感器的裁剪还是会损失一些清晰度和细节。为了获得更好的效果,三星 ISOCELL HM6 的小原生像素在变焦时需要更多的光线。
500 万像素 110 度超广角摄像头和 200 万像素 4 厘米对焦长度的微距传感器在规格表上看起来不错,但实际拍摄效果并不出色。
在视频方面,Magic6 Lite 以 30 FPS 的 UHD 画质拍摄视频。自拍镜头的视频上限为 FHD@30 FPS。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightZoom 5xUltraweitwinkel在受控环境下,Honor 手机的色彩准确度相当高。蓝色的具体亮度有所提高,deltaE 也相当高。白色的显示效果也不理想。
配件和保修 - Magic6 Lite 不含充电器
作为一款中档手机,Magic6 Lite 附带的配件非常简陋。包装盒内只有一根 USB 2.0 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一些信息资料。如果随手机一起订购,还可选配超级充电电源适配器(单机售价 30 欧元),只需额外支付 1 欧元。还可免费加装屏幕保护膜(否则价格为 26 欧元)。
德国保修两年。
输入设备和操作 -Honor Magic6 Lite,带面部解锁功能
Magic6 Lite 的电容式触摸屏非常流畅,最多可同时精确转换 10 根手指的输入。出厂时,屏幕上贴有屏幕保护膜,感觉质量不高。在 120 Hz 的面板上,动画和滚动都很流畅,但有时会有一些轻微的卡顿。
一个小型触觉电机可处理振动。不过并不十分精确,只有嗡嗡的效果。
为了快速解锁,用户可以选择不安全的二维面部解锁(虽然速度很快,但只能在光线良好的情况下使用)或指纹传感器。OLED 面板下方的光学传感器虽然可以更快地解锁,但运行起来并不完美。
屏幕 -Honor OLED 智能手机
Magic6 Lite 配备了一块 6.78 英寸的曲面 AMOLED 屏幕,分辨率为 1200p,DPI 高达 429。刷新率不像 LTPO 面板那样是动态的,它只能在两个级别(60 Hz 和 120 Hz)之间自动切换。
Honor 手机支持 HDR 标准 HGL、HDR10 和杜比视界。此外,它还拥有多项护眼技术,包括低蓝光模式和 1920 Hz 调光。我们确实用示波器测得 PWM 为 528 Hz,但我们用闪烁计测量的结果是更高的值(1,920 Hz)。这最大限度地减少了 PWM 的负面影响,如头痛,因为它减少了人眼可见的闪烁。
Magic6 Lite 的亮度比前代产品提高了 前代产品亮度达到 1,032 cd/m²,屏幕全白,并启用了光线传感器。在 HDR 和 APL18 内容下,我们只能将亮度提高到 1,050 cd/m²,看不到 OLED 在 HDR 模式下的典型改进。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1003 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Honor Magic6 Lite AMOLED, 2652x1200, 6.8" | Honor Magic5 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco F5 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Motorola Edge 40 Neo pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -34% | -65% | -51% | -65% | -67% | |
Brightness middle | 1003 | 846 -16% | 1034 3% | 1205 20% | 940 -6% | 966 -4% |
Brightness | 1007 | 853 -15% | 1033 3% | 1177 17% | 935 -7% | 957 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 88 -8% | 93 -3% | 90 -6% | 99 3% | 97 1% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 1.3 -63% | 1.9 -138% | 1.51 -89% | 2.4 -200% | 1.87 -134% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 2.7 -13% | 3.7 -54% | 4.07 -70% | 3.2 -33% | 4.34 -81% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 1.7 -89% | 2.7 -200% | 2.5 -178% | 2.2 -144% | 2.5 -178% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.19 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.175 101% | 2.05 107% | 2.272 97% |
CCT | 6406 101% | 6570 99% | 6917 94% | 6407 101% | 6422 101% | 6582 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 528 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 528 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 528 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
不同亮度值下的固定变焦测量
在设置中选择色彩模式 "正常",色温为 "标准 "时,色彩准确度最高。使用 X-Rite i1 Pro 3 光谱仪和 CalMan 测量 sRGB 色域的色彩偏差非常小。肉眼无法看到与参考色之间的差异。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.773 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7035 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9635 ms rise | |
↘ 0.9255 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
在户外,Magic6 Lite 的高亮度屏幕给我们留下了深刻印象。不过需要注意的是,最大亮度仅在使用光线传感器时可用。手动调节亮度时,最大亮度为 606 cd/m²。
视角稳定性非常好,即使在极端视角下,亮度损失也很小。色彩不会改变。
性能 -Honor Magic6 Lite 与高通公司-SoC
尽管 骁龙 6 代 1是一款相当新的芯片组(2022 年发布,4 纳米节点),但 Magic6 Lite 的性能在 400 欧元级别中并不出众。特别是在 Geekbench 单核测试中,与竞争对手相比,Cortex A78 的表现相当一般。A Poco F5配备了 骁龙 7+ 2 代包括 Cortex X2 内核的 Poco F5 比Honor 手机快 50%。
但即使在系统基准测试(如 Antutu)中,Magic6 Lite 也很难与之匹敌。如果不使用出厂时未启用的性能模式,性能潜力就会被浪费。
Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (490448 - 564247, n=3) | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (7236 - 8191, n=3) | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G |
GPU 内核为 Adreno 710也用于 骁龙 7s 第二代的 Redmi Note 13 Pro.不过,Magic6 Lite 的性能并没有达到小米手机的水平。尤其是在要求更高的阿兹台克遗址测试中,竞争对手的速度比 Magic6 Lite 更快。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | |
Honor Magic6 Lite |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G |
在浏览器基准测试中,Magic6 Lite 的 CPU/GPU 测试结果比预期的要差。这也反映在日常性能上。浏览速度稳居中端水平,但经常出现小的卡顿,加载网页有时也很费时间。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (69.6 - 88.2, n=3) | |
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (62.5 - 86.6, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120) | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (70 - 95, n=3) | |
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (115 - 132, n=2) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118) | |
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (24583 - 32436, n=3) | |
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121) | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G (Chrome 112) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Honor Magic6 Lite (Chrome 121) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (1188 - 1786, n=3) | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118) | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120) | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116) |
* ... smaller is better
在速度方面,Honor 手机的内部存储器性能良好,尤其是与 UFS 2.2 竞争对手(如 Redmi Note 13 Pro.不过,与其他 UFS 3.1 机型相比,Magic6 Lite 的速度并不慢,这可能是由于采用了 骁龙 SoC.
Honor Magic6 Lite | Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | Xiaomi Poco F5 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | Motorola Edge 40 Neo | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -48% | 66% | -16% | -50% | -1% | 20% | 29% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1827.3 | 486.17 -73% | 1798.37 -2% | 946.8 -48% | 528.32 -71% | 1004.4 -45% | 1742 ? -5% | 1887 ? 3% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 843.34 | 420.44 -50% | 1736.41 106% | 808.2 -4% | 335.39 -60% | 930.9 10% | 1160 ? 38% | 1471 ? 74% |
Random Read 4KB | 223.75 | 171.13 -24% | 389.37 74% | 239.2 7% | 236.23 6% | 279.5 25% | 286 ? 28% | 278 ? 24% |
Random Write 4KB | 271.22 | 149.12 -45% | 498.93 84% | 220.5 -19% | 70.52 -74% | 284.1 5% | 319 ? 18% | 311 ? 15% |
游戏 - Magic6 Lite 管理 60 fps
经过 GPU 基准测试 Adreno 710和 8GB RAM 的支持下,Magic6 Lite 是否能胜任高要求和高帧率游戏。我们使用GameBench 进行测量。.
作为第一款游戏,我们测试了 GPU 密集型幻想动作 RPG《源氏冲击》。游戏设置为高分辨率,帧数下降大大降低了游戏的乐趣。总体而言,平均帧数为 29.5FPS。在降低图形性能的情况下,我们的平均帧数达到了 49 FPS,看起来非常流畅。但我们并没有达到可能的 60 FPS。
即使是要求较低的游戏,如《死亡扳机 2》,也无法完全利用 OLED 面板的 120 Hz 频率。我们测得的帧速率为 60 FPS。
以 UHD 分辨率显示高细节的《PUBG Mobile》的 FPS 一直保持在 40 FPS。如果我们降低设置(HD),GPU 单元可达到 60 FPS。90 FPS 设置不可用。
排放 -Honor Magic6 Lite 几乎没有节流现象
温度
空转时表面温度较低。持续负载时,最高温度会升至 43 摄氏度。为了测量内部发热量,我们使用了 3DMark 压力测试。在此测试中,高通 SoC 在计算密集型场景下几乎没有出现节流现象。对于Honor 手机来说,日常使用中的负载节流是意料之中的。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Poco F5 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Honor Magic6 Lite | |
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G |
发言人
Magic6 Lite 只有一个单声道扬声器,但却能播放出非常响亮的声音。虽然高音很线性,但频谱的中段却不一致。低频几乎没有,底气不足。
耳机和耳塞可通过蓝牙 5.1 或 USB C 端口连接。Magic6 Lite 不支持音频编解码器。
Honor Magic6 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 -Honor 手机,电池电量充足
耗电量
Off / Standby | 0.32 / 0.25 Watt |
Idle | 0.93 / 2.26 / 2.31 Watt |
Load |
7.87 / 8.55 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor Magic6 Lite 5300 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F5 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000 mAh | Motorola Edge 40 Neo 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 3% | 18% | 23% | 22% | -32% | 15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.93 | 0.89 4% | 1.3 -40% | 0.75 19% | 1 -8% | 1.017 ? -9% | 0.882 ? 5% |
Idle Average * | 2.26 | 1.05 54% | 1.4 38% | 1.51 33% | 1.2 47% | 3.86 ? -71% | 1.448 ? 36% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.31 | 1.08 53% | 1.6 31% | 1.62 30% | 1.3 44% | 3.91 ? -69% | 1.603 ? 31% |
Load Average * | 7.87 | 10.86 -38% | 2.5 68% | 4.91 38% | 5.2 34% | 7.63 ? 3% | 6.57 ? 17% |
Load Maximum * | 8.55 | 13.49 -58% | 9.1 -6% | 8.93 -4% | 9.2 -8% | 9.59 ? -12% | 9.92 ? -16% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
尽管 Magic6 Lite 的分辨率更高,但它的电池续航时间却非常出色,与 1080p 竞争产品相比很有竞争力。将亮度设为 150 cd/m²,可以对两款手机进行比较。在实际的 WiFi 测试中,Magic6 Lite 可以使用 15 个小时。在关闭 WiFi 模块并循环播放视频的情况下,我们测得的时间为 17 小时。
Honor Magic6 Lite 5300 mAh | Honor Magic5 Lite 5G 5100 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F5 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000 mAh | Motorola Edge 40 Neo 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -10% | 4% | 7% | 23% | 18% | |
Reader / Idle | 1841 | 1324 -28% | 1786 -3% | 2591 41% | 2444 33% | |
H.264 | 1009 | 1123 11% | 1142 13% | 1508 49% | 1232 22% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 906 | 816 -10% | 1014 12% | 1002 11% | 941 4% | 864 -5% |
Load | 289 | 343 19% | 307 6% | 284 -2% | 355 23% |
Pros
Cons
Honor Magic6 Lite 的评价
Magic6 Lite 的 6.78 英寸大 AMOLED 面板没有大边框,其现代设计给人留下了深刻印象,尤其是屏幕边缘的锥形设计。屏幕明亮,校准准确。如果 1,000 cd/m² 的亮度还不够,那么 Redmi Note 13 Pro可能是一款有趣的中档替代产品,屏幕亮度更高。
Honor Magic6 Lite 的设计在视觉上很讨人喜欢,但由于注重外观,功能上就显得落后了。
对于 400 美元的智能手机来说,妥协总是在拐角处。对于 Magic6 Lite 来说,我们的味蕾需要太多的妥协。缺少 IP 认证或 USB 接口速度慢的问题在中档手机中随处可见,但这款Honor 手机的 WWAN 和 WiFi 5 频率有限以及缺少立体声音效却值得批评。此外 骁龙 6 代 1对于这个级别的手机来说并不强大。该机 Poco F5的性能要好得多。
Honor 提供三年更新--不错,但三星的 Galaxy A54 5G.凭借 OIS 以及 eSIM 和 microSD 支持,三星手机是 Magic6 Lite 的有趣替代品。
定价和可用性
Honor Magic6 Lite 在德国的售价为 400 欧元。
Honor Magic6 Lite
- 02/01/2024 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.