Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarHonor Magic5 Lite 5G评论：薄的智能手机，厚的电池
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Honor Magic5 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 175 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 84.9 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4 | 199 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2340x1080 | |
| 85.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 181 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G73 5G Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256 | 181 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 |
外壳和功能：Magic5 Lite拥有一个别致的外观
Magic5 Lite 5G的一个亮点是其非常薄的外壳，由于采用了圆角边缘，看起来更加纤细。这款Honor 智能手机有午夜黑、翡翠绿和钛银三种颜色选择。后者是我们的测试设备，其实际颜色不容易确定，因为它随着光线的入射而变化。
Honor 可选择提供所谓的惊喜壳（20欧元），它不仅可以保护智能手机，而且还有非常花哨的设计。甚至相机环的表面也可以用附带的贴纸来适应箱子的外观。
做工似乎质量很高，背面的哑光塑料对指纹不敏感。缝隙紧密而均匀，但Honor ，没有在卡槽的盖子上花太多功夫。它在铝框中略微凹陷，也有不同的颜色。
硬件包括蓝牙5.1、NFC和一个红外辐射器，可用于控制家庭多媒体设备、空调、摄像头等。不提供音频插孔，也不支持microSD卡。作为回报，提供了两个存储版本：6GB内存和128GB内部存储（建议零售价：370欧元），以及8GB内存和256GB内部存储（建议零售价：400欧元）的变体。
不同于 魔法4 Lite的情况下，虽然包装尺寸没有变化，但不再包括电源适配器。然而，这对买家来说并不坏，因为快速充电技术与华为和Honor 的旧电源适配器完全兼容。那些没有电源适配器或仍想拥有一个新的电源适配器的人可以在Honor 商店以1欧元的价格购买一个。
通信、软件和操作：覆盖大多数5G频段，但没有eSIM
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G支持目前所有标准的最重要移动频段，包括5G Sub-6。因此，欧洲范围内的所有国家都被覆盖，但计划长途旅行的用户应事先检查智能手机是否符合当地要求。
WLAN中支持Wi-Fi 5，Magic5 Lite在这个标准中既能稳定工作，又能达到预期速度。
Honor 智能手机可以接受最多两个nano-SIM卡，但不支持eSIM。不过，支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。没有集成的SIP账户管理。握在耳边时，语音质量很好，小的噪音也被抑制了。然而，用户在扬声器模式下听起来相当尖锐。
操作系统是过时的谷歌Android 12，Honor ，在上面运行其Magic UI 6.1。将会有一个更新到Android 13，但这将在以后到来。此外，Honor ，提供总共三年的安全补丁。
正面使用了强化玻璃，据说对跌落特别坚固。此外，Honor ，用保护膜保护显示屏。滑动性能很好，触摸屏的工作采样率高达300赫兹，因此输入的信息可以被非常迅速和准确地识别。
在生物识别安全方面，面板上集成了一个光学指纹传感器，具有很高的识别率，可以快速解锁Magic5 Lite。此外，也可以通过前置摄像头进行不太安全的面部识别。ERM电机负责振动，它非常安静，并提供相对准确的反馈。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A34 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G73 5G | |
| Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | |
| Honor Magic4 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A34 5G | |
| Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G73 5G | |
| Honor Magic4 Lite | |
照相机：Magic5 Lite配备了一个64MP的传感器
这些相机在各方面都比以前有了很大的改进。 魔法4 Lite.前置摄像头在规格表上几乎是相同的，但它拍摄的照片要好得多。在人像模式下，虚化效果可以更柔和，但主体没有硬边。
背面的三摄像头有一个新的64MP传感器，拍摄的照片要好得多。就在测试期结束前，Magic5 Lite 5G收到了一个更新，明显地再次提高了照片质量；这里显示的照片是在这之前拍摄的。
虽然终于有了一个超广角镜头，但由于分辨率低，细节上相当差。微距镜头看起来也差不多。Honor 智能手机可以在两侧录制视频，最好是30帧/秒的全高清。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
显示屏：Honor 依靠一个明亮的OLED面板，带有PWM调光功能。
去年的Magic4 Lite仍然使用液晶屏，但Magic5 Lite 5G现在依靠的是现代OLED显示屏，亮度约为300 cd/m²，最高可达1052 cd/m²，画面内容明暗分布均匀（APL18）。刷新率既可以固定在60赫兹、120赫兹，也可以在这两个数值之间动态切换。
对于HDR，只支持HLG和HDR10。由于其1920赫兹的高频PWM调光，OLED的闪烁实际上并不是一个问题--这也是用于 魔法5 Pro.尽管如此，我们用示波器测量了一个60赫兹的恒定频率，这可能是一种烧毁保护。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 846 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Honor Magic5 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G73 5G IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Honor Magic4 Lite TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 96% | 12% | -2899% | -1951% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.2 | 1.33 ? -11% | 1.57 ? -31% | 33.7 ? -2708% | 31.23 ? -2503% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1 ? | 1.22 ? -22% | 1.32 ? -32% | 31.9 ? -3090% | 14.99 ? -1399% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 | 253 322% | 120 100% | ||
| Screen | -26% | -14% | -50% | -63% | |
| Brightness middle | 846 | 922 9% | 770 -9% | 516 -39% | 552 -35% |
| Brightness | 853 | 930 9% | 778 -9% | 498 -42% | 512 -40% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 98 11% | 97 10% | 89 1% | 84 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.82 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.5 -92% | 1.6 -23% | 2.08 -60% | 2.2 -69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.7 | 3.6 -33% | 3.3 -22% | 5.94 -120% | 6 -122% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.7 -59% | 2.2 -29% | 2.4 -41% | 3.5 -106% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.09 105% | 2.23 99% | 2.283 96% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6570 99% | 6661 98% | 6882 94% | 7006 93% | 6410 101% |
| Contrast | 1200 | 673 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 35% /
15% | -1% /
-5% | -1475% /
-762% | -1007% /
-535% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5055 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4965 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列
性能、排放和电池寿命：Magic5 Lite的单声道扬声器
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G采用的是较低的中端SoC-- 骁龙695 5G.该芯片提供了体面的系统性能，但那些喜欢玩高要求游戏的人将不得不在细节和帧率方面做出一些妥协。然而，其性能很容易满足日常任务的需要。
由于我们现在使用Burnout基准来确定表面温度，温度比其他测试的智能手机要高得多，但它们仍然在无害的范围内，特别是由于智能手机的这种高负荷在日常使用中几乎不会发生。Honor 智能手机在3DMark Wild Life（Extreme）压力测试中没有发现任何问题，可以随时调用其性能而不受限制。
Magic5 Lite的单声道扬声器不太令人信服。中音太平，导致声音太尖锐。有线耳机可以通过USB-C连接，而蓝牙则可用于无线音频传输。
由于其5100毫安时的电池，这款智能手机的电池运行时间确实不错，但如果效率稍好，肯定会更好。
| Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | Samsung Galaxy A34 5G | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | Motorola Moto G73 5G | Honor Magic4 Lite | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 42% | 85% | 68% | -5% | 28% | 172% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 486.17 | 887.41 83% | 1008.77 107% | 963.54 98% | 488.66 1% | 728 ? 50% | 1839 ? 278% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 420.44 | 494.67 18% | 878.9 109% | 808.95 92% | 385.52 -8% | 527 ? 25% | 1425 ? 239% |
| Random Read 4KB | 171.13 | 216.75 27% | 244.85 43% | 231.38 35% | 155.16 -9% | 191.7 ? 12% | 277 ? 62% |
| Random Write 4KB | 149.12 | 206.14 38% | 267.41 79% | 220.46 48% | 143.61 -4% | 185.8 ? 25% | 309 ? 107% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A34 5G | |
| Honor Magic4 Lite | |
| Honor Magic4 Lite | |
| Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G73 5G | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic4 Lite | |
| Honor Magic4 Lite | |
| Honor Magic5 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A34 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G73 5G | |
扬声器
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Pros
Cons
评语：Honor ，改善了它的中端产品。
我们喜欢Honor Magic5 Lite 5G，比它的前代产品好得多，特别是因为这次的显示屏和主摄像头都有很大改进。OLED面板不仅亮度提高了约53%，而且还提供了更逼真的色彩再现。此外，1,920赫兹的PWM调光也是一个优质的功能，以前曾在 魔法5 Pro.
相机收到了一个新的6400万像素传感器，这使得照片比4800万像素的光学器件更好。 魔法4 Lite.然而，它仍然不是一个高飞的相机。超广角镜头早就该出现了，但它的照片最多只适合社交媒体。
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G是一款超薄的智能手机，具有强大的运行时间和明亮的显示屏，但它在相机方面有缺点。
更新供应是可扩展的--目前的Android 13应该会跟进，但其他手机已经在排队获得Android 14。另外，总共有三年的安全补丁。三星在这个价格范围内做得更好，因为 Galaxy A34预定甚至会得到Android 17。
尽管如此，Honor ，提供了一个不错的整体包装。我们对其纤细的结构，特别是相对较低的重量感到惊讶，因为它包含一个5100毫安时的强大电池。它还配备了一个红外辐射器。
快速充电不需要，但不再包括一个合适的电源适配器。相反，买家可以选择以象征性的欧元购买。Honor ，还以相当便宜的附加费用购买较大存储量的版本，以弥补缺少的microSD插槽。
除了Galaxy A34，还有 Poco X5 Pro是Magic5 Lite 5G的一个很好的替代品，但两者都有更多闪烁的显示屏。如果你在这方面比较敏感，你可能还想考虑一下 摩托G73 5G它使用的是IPS面板。
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
- 05/19/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
