Notebookcheck Logo

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G评论:薄的智能手机,厚的电池

苗条的美。

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G比它的前辈做得更好,但它仍然依靠同样的骁龙695 SoC,这在这个价格范围内仍然非常普遍。从外观上看,Magic5 Lite以其纤细的结构而令人信服,它还能容纳一个5100毫安时的大电池。
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G的回顾。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G (Magic5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, 10 multi touch points, 300 Hz touch sampling rate, AMOLED, HLG, HDR10, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110.84 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Rotation, Gyroscope, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 161.6 x 73.9
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 40W-Charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.8) + 5 MPix (Ultrawide, f/2.2) + 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); 1080p-video; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Onscreen, SIM-Tool, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), Bumper, MagicUI 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1), DRM Widevine L1, IR-Blaster, fanless
Weight
175 g
Price
370 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
82 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
175 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
84.9 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4
199 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2340x1080
85.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
181 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
82.8 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Motorola Moto G73 5G
Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256
181 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2400x1080

外壳和功能:Magic5 Lite拥有一个别致的外观

Magic5 Lite 5G的一个亮点是其非常薄的外壳,由于采用了圆角边缘,看起来更加纤细。这款Honor 智能手机有午夜黑、翡翠绿和钛银三种颜色选择。后者是我们的测试设备,其实际颜色不容易确定,因为它随着光线的入射而变化。

Honor 可选择提供所谓的惊喜壳(20欧元),它不仅可以保护智能手机,而且还有非常花哨的设计。甚至相机环的表面也可以用附带的贴纸来适应箱子的外观。

做工似乎质量很高,背面的哑光塑料对指纹不敏感。缝隙紧密而均匀,但Honor ,没有在卡槽的盖子上花太多功夫。它在铝框中略微凹陷,也有不同的颜色。

硬件包括蓝牙5.1、NFC和一个红外辐射器,可用于控制家庭多媒体设备、空调、摄像头等。不提供音频插孔,也不支持microSD卡。作为回报,提供了两个存储版本:6GB内存和128GB内部存储(建议零售价:370欧元),以及8GB内存和256GB内部存储(建议零售价:400欧元)的变体。

不同于 魔法4 Lite的情况下,虽然包装尺寸没有变化,但不再包括电源适配器。然而,这对买家来说并不坏,因为快速充电技术与华为和Honor 的旧电源适配器完全兼容。那些没有电源适配器或仍想拥有一个新的电源适配器的人可以在Honor 商店以1欧元的价格购买一个。

Honor 魔法5 Lite。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
Honor 魔法5 Lite。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
Honor 魔法5 Lite。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
顶上。(Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
左图。(Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
右图。(Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
秦。(Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Honor 魔法5 Lite。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
背面有惊奇的案例

尺寸比较

166.07 mm 75.78 mm 8.05 mm 195 g162.91 mm 76.03 mm 7.9 mm 181 g161.42 mm 73.84 mm 8.29 mm 181 g161.6 mm 73.9 mm 7.9 mm 175 g161.3 mm 78.1 mm 8.2 mm 199 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信、软件和操作:覆盖大多数5G频段,但没有eSIM

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G支持目前所有标准的最重要移动频段,包括5G Sub-6。因此,欧洲范围内的所有国家都被覆盖,但计划长途旅行的用户应事先检查智能手机是否符合当地要求。

WLAN中支持Wi-Fi 5,Magic5 Lite在这个标准中既能稳定工作,又能达到预期速度。

Honor 智能手机可以接受最多两个nano-SIM卡,但不支持eSIM。不过,支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。没有集成的SIP账户管理。握在耳边时,语音质量很好,小的噪音也被抑制了。然而,用户在扬声器模式下听起来相当尖锐。

操作系统是过时的谷歌Android 12,Honor ,在上面运行其Magic UI 6.1。将会有一个更新到Android 13,但这将在以后到来。此外,Honor ,提供总共三年的安全补丁。

正面使用了强化玻璃,据说对跌落特别坚固。此外,Honor ,用保护膜保护显示屏。滑动性能很好,触摸屏的工作采样率高达300赫兹,因此输入的信息可以被非常迅速和准确地识别。

在生物识别安全方面,面板上集成了一个光学指纹传感器,具有很高的识别率,可以快速解锁Magic5 Lite。此外,也可以通过前置摄像头进行不太安全的面部识别。ERM电机负责振动,它非常安静,并提供相对准确的反馈。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
977 (487min - 997max) MBit/s +165%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
679 (653min - 709max) MBit/s +84%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
373 (355min - 386max) MBit/s +1%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
 
369 (337min - 380max) MBit/s
Honor Magic4 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (175min - 354max) MBit/s -6%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
805 (686min - 905max) MBit/s +125%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
634 (610min - 642max) MBit/s +78%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
 
357 (172min - 378max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G73 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
356 (333min - 362max) MBit/s 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
354 (339min - 359max) MBit/s -1%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (172-378)
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø352 (339-359)
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (337-380)
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (175-354)

照相机:Magic5 Lite配备了一个64MP的传感器

用Honor Magic5 Lite在人像模式下自拍
用Honor Magic5 Lite在人像模式下自拍

这些相机在各方面都比以前有了很大的改进。 魔法4 Lite.前置摄像头在规格表上几乎是相同的,但它拍摄的照片要好得多。在人像模式下,虚化效果可以更柔和,但主体没有硬边。

背面的三摄像头有一个新的64MP传感器,拍摄的照片要好得多。就在测试期结束前,Magic5 Lite 5G收到了一个更新,明显地再次提高了照片质量;这里显示的照片是在这之前拍摄的。

虽然终于有了一个超广角镜头,但由于分辨率低,细节上相当差。微距镜头看起来也差不多。Honor 智能手机可以在两侧录制视频,最好是30帧/秒的全高清。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic5 Lite 5G: 5.62 ∆E min: 1.61 - max: 10.21 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.5 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
63.8 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
40 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
88.6 ∆E
70.1 ∆E
51.4 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic5 Lite 5G: 46.1 ∆E min: 13.85 - max: 88.6 ∆E

显示屏:Honor 依靠一个明亮的OLED面板,带有PWM调光功能。

子像素结构
子像素结构

去年的Magic4 Lite仍然使用液晶屏,但Magic5 Lite 5G现在依靠的是现代OLED显示屏,亮度约为300 cd/m²,最高可达1052 cd/m²,画面内容明暗分布均匀(APL18)。刷新率既可以固定在60赫兹、120赫兹,也可以在这两个数值之间动态切换。

对于HDR,只支持HLG和HDR10。由于其1920赫兹的高频PWM调光,OLED的闪烁实际上并不是一个问题--这也是用于 魔法5 Pro.尽管如此,我们用示波器测量了一个60赫兹的恒定频率,这可能是一种烧毁保护。

818
cd/m²
839
cd/m²
913
cd/m²
814
cd/m²
846
cd/m²
913
cd/m²
807
cd/m²
829
cd/m²
900
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 913 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 853.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 846 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G73 5G
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Honor Magic4 Lite
TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.8"
Response Times
96%
12%
-2899%
-1951%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.2
1.33 ?(0.6985, 0.629)
-11%
1.57 ?(0.7425, 0.827)
-31%
33.7 ?(16.9, 16.8)
-2708%
31.23 ?(14.33, 16.9)
-2503%
Response Time Black / White *
1 ?(0.5055, 0.4965)
1.22 ?(0.6245, 0.592)
-22%
1.32 ?(0.6325, 0.69)
-32%
31.9 ?(11.6, 20.3)
-3090%
14.99 ?(5.441, 9.547)
-1399%
PWM Frequency
60
253
322%
120
100%
Screen
-26%
-14%
-50%
-63%
Brightness middle
846
922
9%
770
-9%
516
-39%
552
-35%
Brightness
853
930
9%
778
-9%
498
-42%
512
-40%
Brightness Distribution
88
98
11%
97
10%
89
1%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.43
0.82
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
2.5
-92%
1.6
-23%
2.08
-60%
2.2
-69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
3.6
-33%
3.3
-22%
5.94
-120%
6
-122%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
2.7
-59%
2.2
-29%
2.4
-41%
3.5
-106%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.09 105%
2.23 99%
2.283 96%
2.14 103%
CCT
6570 99%
6661 98%
6882 94%
7006 93%
6410 101%
Contrast
1200
673
Total Average (Program / Settings)
35% / 15%
-1% / -5%
-1475% / -762%
-1007% / -535%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5055 ms rise
↘ 0.4965 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25 %显示亮度
25 %
50 % 显示亮度
50 %
75 %显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

灰度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
户外观赏
户外观赏
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命:Magic5 Lite的单声道扬声器

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G采用的是较低的中端SoC-- 骁龙695 5G.该芯片提供了体面的系统性能,但那些喜欢玩高要求游戏的人将不得不在细节和帧率方面做出一些妥协。然而,其性能很容易满足日常任务的需要。

由于我们现在使用Burnout基准来确定表面温度,温度比其他测试的智能手机要高得多,但它们仍然在无害的范围内,特别是由于智能手机的这种高负荷在日常使用中几乎不会发生。Honor 智能手机在3DMark Wild Life(Extreme)压力测试中没有发现任何问题,可以随时调用其性能而不受限制。

Magic5 Lite的单声道扬声器不太令人信服。中音太平,导致声音太尖锐。有线耳机可以通过USB-C连接,而蓝牙则可用于无线音频传输。

由于其5100毫安时的电池,这款智能手机的电池运行时间确实不错,但如果效率稍好,肯定会更好。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +56%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
789 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
782 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
698 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=24)
676 Points +2%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
672 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
659 Points -1%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
666 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points +83%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2987 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2315 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1909 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=24)
1904 Points +1%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1891 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1681 Points -11%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1663 Points -12%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1029 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1022 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
916 Points +2%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
898 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (888 - 898, n=2)
893 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points +63%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2987 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2497 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2306 Points +12%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2067 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1918 - 2067, n=2)
1993 Points -4%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
12699 Points +26%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
11787 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11721 Points +16%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10834 Points +8%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10071 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 11732, n=23)
9629 Points -4%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5008 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4185 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)
3006 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2827 - 2983, n=19)
2930 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2827 Points
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2553 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5134 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4358 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)
3166 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2733 - 2845, n=19)
2813 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2759 Points
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2420 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4573 Points
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3673 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3093 - 3554, n=19)
3407 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)
3260 Points
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3163 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3093 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)
8254 Points +166%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5341 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4321 Points +39%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3106 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2887 - 3107, n=21)
3069 Points -1%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2887 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2589 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)
12419 Points +314%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5563 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4406 Points +47%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3001 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2812 - 3008, n=21)
2974 Points -1%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2812 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2416 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4897 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)
4759 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4047 Points +14%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3537 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3182 - 3613, n=21)
3465 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3452 Points -2%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3182 Points -10%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=112, last 2 years)
2823 Points +133%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2465 Points +104%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2279 Points +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1197 - 1292, n=22)
1212 Points 0%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1209 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1205 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
Points -100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=188, last 2 years)
7929 Points +561%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2434 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2220 Points +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1193 - 1227, n=22)
1204 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1202 Points 0%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1199 Points
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
Points -100%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=195, last 2 years)
2172 Points +503%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
687 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
640 Points +78%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
360 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (355 - 364, n=22)
360 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
357 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
Points -100%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2166 Points +515%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
681 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
622 Points +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (351 - 371, n=22)
354 Points +1%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
352 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
351 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
Points -100%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)
50.7 fps +167%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
30 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
26 fps +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (18 - 38, n=23)
19.7 fps +4%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
19 fps 0%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps -5%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)
84.9 fps +286%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
35 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
29 fps +32%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (21 - 23, n=23)
21.5 fps -2%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
21 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
21 fps -5%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)
38.9 fps +224%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
19 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
17 fps +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (11 - 24, n=23)
12.4 fps +3%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
12 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps -8%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
11 fps -8%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)
34 fps +315%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
13 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11 fps +34%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8.2 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (7.7 - 8.2, n=23)
7.99 fps -3%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7.1 fps -13%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 53, n=207, last 2 years)
15.9 fps +342%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5.9 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4.7 fps +31%
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4 fps +11%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3.6 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3.5 - 4, n=21)
3.6 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3 fps -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +69%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
26766 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
25439 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
25154 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (17849 - 31647, n=21)
24051 Points +5%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22847 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
21302 Points -7%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A34 5GXiaomi Poco X5 ProMotorola Moto G73 5GHonor Magic4 LiteAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
42%
85%
68%
-5%
28%
177%
Sequential Read 256KB
486.17
887.41
83%
1008.77
107%
963.54
98%
488.66
1%
Sequential Write 256KB
420.44
494.67
18%
878.9
109%
808.95
92%
385.52
-8%
Random Read 4KB
171.13
216.75
27%
244.85
43%
231.38
35%
155.16
-9%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
12%
Random Write 4KB
149.12
206.14
38%
267.41
79%
220.46
48%
143.61
-4%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
25%

温度

Max. Load
 44.3 °C42 °C38.6 °C 
 43.7 °C40.9 °C38.1 °C 
 42.3 °C42.8 °C37.8 °C 
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 41.2 °C
36.7 °C39.7 °C41.8 °C
36.6 °C38.9 °C40.9 °C
36.7 °C37.3 °C40.5 °C
Maximum: 41.8 °C
Average: 38.8 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
99.7 (4.08min - 4.1max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
99.6 (3.82min - 3.84max) % +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite
99.2 % +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite
99.1 (2.14min - 2.16max) % 0%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
98.7 (2.14min - 2.17max) %
Motorola Moto G73 5G
% -100%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic4 Lite
99.8 % 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite
99.8 (7.21min - 7.23max) % 0%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
99.8 (7.2min - 7.21max) %
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
99.4 (13.6min - 13.6max) % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
99 (14.6min - 14.7max) % -1%
Motorola Moto G73 5G
% -100%

Legend

 
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Motorola Moto G73 5G MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.737.52520.825.9311933.34017.132.45033.439.46320.931.48016.635.610020.533.412516.533.916014.738.82001446.125014.352.231513.15240013.660.450013.265.463012.366.780012.568.7100011.971.8125012.672.8160012.973.8200013.374250012.574.1315013.480.3400013.985.8500013.982.5630013.576.7800013.778.21000013.975.11250013.5661600013.757.2SPL25.390.7N0.776.6median 13.5median 71.8Delta0.710.629.638.33031.824.532.925.831.937.538.725.232.320.235.420.435.717.54214.453.314.352.515.255.411.957.913.560.612.162.112.460.611.766.111.873.811.476.712.378.212.279.212.179.512.281.312.981.713.481.713.27812.974.713.674.313.47213.260.824.890.40.678.5median 12.9median 73.80.910.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Magic5 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A34 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Motorola Moto G73 5G
5000 mAh
1046 min +28%
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
5000 mAh
1024 min +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years)
991 min +21%
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
5000 mAh
827 min +1%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
5100 mAh
816 min
Honor Magic4 Lite
4800 mAh
760 min -7%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 112)
13h 36min

Pros

+ 明亮的120 Hz OLED
+ 1.920 Hz PWM调光
+ 轻薄的设计
+ 良好的电池运行时间

Cons

- 只有Android 12,更新时间短,令人担忧
- 薄弱的附加相机光学器件
- 平庸的扬声器

评语:Honor ,改善了它的中端产品。

在审查中: Honor Magic5 Lite 5G。测试设备由Honor 提供。
在审查中: Honor Magic5 Lite 5G。测试设备由Honor 提供。

我们喜欢Honor Magic5 Lite 5G,比它的前代产品好得多,特别是因为这次的显示屏和主摄像头都有很大改进。OLED面板不仅亮度提高了约53%,而且还提供了更逼真的色彩再现。此外,1,920赫兹的PWM调光也是一个优质的功能,以前曾在 魔法5 Pro.

相机收到了一个新的6400万像素传感器,这使得照片比4800万像素的光学器件更好。 魔法4 Lite.然而,它仍然不是一个高飞的相机。超广角镜头早就该出现了,但它的照片最多只适合社交媒体。

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G是一款超薄的智能手机,具有强大的运行时间和明亮的显示屏,但它在相机方面有缺点。

更新供应是可扩展的--目前的Android 13应该会跟进,但其他手机已经在排队获得Android 14。另外,总共有三年的安全补丁。三星在这个价格范围内做得更好,因为 Galaxy A34预定甚至会得到Android 17。

尽管如此,Honor ,提供了一个不错的整体包装。我们对其纤细的结构,特别是相对较低的重量感到惊讶,因为它包含一个5100毫安时的强大电池。它还配备了一个红外辐射器。

快速充电不需要,但不再包括一个合适的电源适配器。相反,买家可以选择以象征性的欧元购买。Honor ,还以相当便宜的附加费用购买较大存储量的版本,以弥补缺少的microSD插槽。

除了Galaxy A34,还有 Poco X5 Pro是Magic5 Lite 5G的一个很好的替代品,但两者都有更多闪烁的显示屏。如果你在这方面比较敏感,你可能还想考虑一下 摩托G73 5G它使用的是IPS面板。

价格和可用性

在审查之时,Magic5 Lite可直接从Honor分别为300欧元(6/128GB)和350欧元(8/256GB),但在Saturn(249欧元)和Amazon DE(285欧元)。

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G - 05/19/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
43 / 70 → 61%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
92%
Games Performance
37 / 64 → 58%
Application Performance
83 / 86 → 97%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
54%
Average
76%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Honor Magic5 Lite 5G评论:薄的智能手机,厚的电池
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-05-24 (Update: 2023-05-24)