Notebookcheck Logo
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)

Honor Magic7 Pro 评测--功能强大的拍照智能手机

神奇。

人工智能是Honor 的重中之重，这也是 Magic7 Pro 拥有各种支持人工智能的新功能的原因。尤其是它的摄像头有了明显的改进，但Honor 在其他方面也没有放松警惕，并推出了 2025 年最好的智能手机之一。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

结论 - 功能强大的整体解决方案，但也有不足之处

Honor Magic7 Pro 具备成为 2025 年最佳智能手机之一的条件，它的整体配置令人印象深刻，几乎不需要任何妥协。它拥有令人印象深刻的摄像头配置、性能和电池续航时间，而且是目前Android 智能手机中唯一一款具有 3D 面部识别功能的手机。最后，它还重新配备了超声波指纹传感器，现在还支持 6 GHz Wi-Fi。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

即便如此，这款智能手机的温度管理功能仍需改进--尽管我们在日常使用中并未发现任何限制。此外，UWB、Bluetooth LE 和 Auracast 等功能也仍然缺失。它的 5 年更新交付期还不错，但 Oppo、三星和谷歌提供的服务更多。

Pros

+ 明亮准确的 LTPO 显示屏
+ 良好的运行时间
+ 快速充电
+ 多功能摄像头设置
+ 3D 面部识别和超声波指印传感器

Cons

- 在某些压力测试中过热
- 电池容量较小的欧盟版本
- 无 UWB
- 仅支持 HDR Vivid 的 HDR 视频

价格和供应情况

Magic7 Pro 不在美国销售。在欧洲，这款手机的售价为 1,300 欧元（约合 1,340 美元）。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
89.2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $8.99
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...
2. $12.98
Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro...
3. $3.88
YOUULAR [1 Pack Screen Prote...
List Price: 1300€		223 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
2800x1280
453 PPI
OLED
2.
86%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $949.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...
2. $9.99
OMOTON [3+2 Pack for Google ...
3. $5.98
Ferilinso Full Coverage 3 Pa...
List Price: 1299€		221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"
2992x1344
482 PPI
OLED
3.
88.6%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro ⎘
Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe		Amazon:
1. $37.00
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Clea...
2. $7.98
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
3. $34.00
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Clear Ca...
List Price: 1449€		227 g256 GB NVMe6.90"
2868x1320
458 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
4.
91.1% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: $959.99
List Price: 1449€		232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
3120x1440
505 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5.
89.9%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 		Amazon:
1. $949.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...
2. $9.29
Anbzsign (2+2 Pack for Xiaom...
3. $69.99
Xiaomi Redmi Smart Band Pro,...
List Price: 810€		213 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"
3200x1440
521 PPI
AMOLED
6.
86.7%
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
15 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $11.99
MAOUICI Glass for Vivo X200 ...
2. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
3. $12.98
Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro...
List Price: 850€		223 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2800x1260
453 PPI
OLED

Honor Magic7 Pro 是 Magic6 Pro 的继任者。 Magic6 Pro是Honor 2025 年的旗舰智能手机。它于去年在中国发布。

Honor Magic7 Pro 进行了大量微调，改进了相机设置，并通过 AI 功能进行了极大优化。此外，现在终于搭载了 6 GHz Wi-Fi，但仍然没有 UWB。对于欧盟地区的用户来说，一个令人烦恼的问题是它的电池容量较小。

在本次测试的欧洲地区，Honor Magic7 Pro 将只推出一个存储版本（12/512 GB），MRSP 约为 1340 美元。

规格 Honor Magic7 Pro

Honor Magic7 Pro (Magic7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 830
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 19.7:9, 2800 x 1280 pixel 453 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, 1 - 120 LTPO, NanoCrystal Shield, 4,320 Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 481.83 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, 3D face scan, OTG, IR blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28 (A, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 162.7 x 77.1
Battery
5270 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-carbon anode (Gen 3), Power-enhanced Chip Honor E2
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (24 mm, F/1.4-2.0, OIS) 200 MPix (3x optical zoom, 1/1.4", f/2.6, 72 mm, OIS) 50 MPix (f/2.0, 12 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0, 25 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, SIM tool, USB cable, MagicOS 9.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10 , Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 / IP69 | USB Copy Test: 320 MB/s (connected to Samsung 980 Pro in an Asus ROG Strix Arion Case (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: - W/kg, Head-SAR: - W/kg | max. charging speed: 100 W (wired) / 80 W (wireless) | Communication Chip Honor C2, Security Chip Honor S1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
223 g
Price
1300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护套 - 防水性能更强的 Magic7 Pro

Honor Magic7 Pro 有黑色、大理石纹白色（月影灰）和蓝色（微风蓝）三种颜色，后者是我们的测试机。Honor 智能手机的正面和背面都是圆角设计，因此尽管重量很重，但拿在手里却很舒适。背面的玻璃是磨砂的，几乎不会留下指纹，触感非常好。

正面由纳米水晶盾保护，我们已经从 Magic6 Pro.尽管它已经具有超强的防刮花性能，Honor ，但它又在上面增加了一层保护膜。我们非常喜欢它的制造质量。所有缝隙都紧密均匀，Magic7 Pro 可以承受扭转而不会发出声音。它的高光边框看起来很时尚，但只有在被触摸之前才会如此。

Honor Magic7 Pro 不仅获得了常规的 IP68 认证，还将其扩展到 IP69，这意味着它不仅防水防尘，还能承受高压和蒸汽喷射清洁。

(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
162.7 mm 77.1 mm 8.8 mm 223 g162.8 mm 76.6 mm 8.5 mm 221 g163 mm 77.6 mm 8.25 mm 227 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g162.36 mm 75.95 mm 8.2 mm 223 g161.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.7 mm 213 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 高标准，但无新意

Honor Magic7 Pro 的连接性与前代产品非常相似。它再次配备了快速 USB 3.2 端口（Gen 1），在我们的复制测试中达到了 320 MB/s 的良好速度。此外，还可以进行有线图像输出，其中的内容会被镜像。

除 NFC 外，Magic7 Pro 顶部还嵌入了一个红外发射器，可用于远程控制电视、接收器、空调系统或相机等兼容设备。不过，这款Honor 智能手机仍然不支持 UWB。

另一方面，它的指纹传感器现在依赖于更强大的超声波技术。蓝牙 LE 或 Auracast 均不支持。

顶部：扬声器、红外线、麦克风（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
顶部：扬声器、红外线、麦克风
左侧（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
左侧
右侧：音量、功率（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
右侧：音量、电源
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡

软件 - 带有深度伪造检测功能的 MagicOS 9.0

Magic7 Pro 配备了谷歌Android 15 和自己的 MagicOS 9.0 用户界面（UI），同样支持众多人工智能功能。其中包括 Magic Portal、人工智能支持的实时翻译和图像编辑。此外，Gemini 和 Circle to Search 也已搭载。

Honor 在 2024 年的 IFA 展会上，微软已经展示了其人工智能深度伪造检测（Deepfake Detection）功能。它能识别视频通话中的深度伪造（即图像处理），并向 Magic7 Pro 用户发出潜在危险警告。不过，该功能尚未在手机上市时推出，但将在第一季度通过更新添加。计算人工智能功能和上传数据的服务器属于 ，位于德国法兰克福，用于该智能手机的全球版本。Honor

魔环
圆圈搜索

可持续性

Honor Magic7 Pro 的外包装盒相当小巧，里面也没有塑料包装。遗憾的是，Honor 又一次决定用透明薄膜对整个结构进行收缩包装。所有配件都用小纸箱包装。

所有配件都装在小纸箱里。Honor 没有提供任何有关 Magic7 Pro 的二氧化碳排放量或生产过程中是否使用了可回收材料以及使用了多少可回收材料的信息。

Magic7 Pro 的备件不直接出售给客户，也没有维修说明。不过，您可以通过Honor 直接维修您的智能手机。

Honor Magic7 Pro 将发布四次重大更新和为期五年的智能手机安全补丁。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 精确定位服务和 6 GHz 无线局域网

Honor Magic7 Pro 支持现代 Wi-Fi 7，其中终于包括 6 GHz 频段。与我们的华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用时，它实现了较高且稳定的传输速率，在两个频段上的传输速度都略快于接收速度。

此外，它还支持广泛的蜂窝频率，确保了全球范围内的广泛应用；最多可支持 5G Sub6。在我们的测试中，它在大都市环境中的接收效果非常好，无可挑剔。

Networking
Honor Magic7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼84%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
965 (min: 943) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
915 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1852 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1864 (min: 1828) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
887 (min: 567) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
762 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1418 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1258 (min: 1190) MBit/s ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
556 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 815) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1461 (min: 1284) MBit/s ∼78%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
816 (min: 564) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1520 (min: 1364) MBit/s ∼82%
Vivo X200 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 462) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
966 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼98%
Average Wi-Fi 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1012 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
989 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1538 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1552 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
723 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
709 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1428 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1381 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼74%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1853 (928-1907)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1526 (815-1800)
Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1567 (1486-1593)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1461 (1284-1543)
Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø981 (886-1008)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (253-611)
Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (758-853)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø786 (397-819)
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动
GPS 测试：室内
室内

Honor 关于 Magic7 Pro 支持哪些全球卫星网络 (GNSS)，Magic7 Pro 没有提供任何准确的信息。不过，在测试过程中，我们可以通过双频连接使用普通网络。手机定位超级快速准确。

在一次自行车旅行中，我们比较了智能手机的定位服务与 Garmin Venu 2Honor 手机的定位效果确实非常好。

全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结

电话功能和通话质量

Honor Magic7 Pro 支持双信使应用程序、VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话，可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡。第二张 SIM 卡可以停用，改用 eSIM 卡。两张激活的 SIM 卡均可使用 5G，但如果其中一张 SIM 卡的接收效果较差，数据线无法自动切换。

其通话质量与 Magic6 Pro它的通话质量与 Magic6 Pro 相似--将手机放在耳边听起来非常自然，即使是干扰性较强的噪音，也能可靠地过滤掉大部分环境噪音。扬声器模式的通话质量很好，麦克风的通话距离也很长。即使在距离智能手机将近四米的地方，我们仍然可以很容易地与电话另一端的人取得联系，但声音略显尖锐。

相机 - Magic7 Pro 配备全新 20000 万像素传感器

专业版自拍
自拍（纵向模式）

Honor Magic7 Pro 的前置摄像头也是 50 万像素，没有自动对焦功能。不过，由于它支持像素二进制，因此即使在弱光环境下也能拍出不错的照片。如果你喜欢，还可以使用全分辨率自拍。前置摄像头现在可以录制高达 60fps 的超高清视频。

超级动感猎鹰主摄像头是背面设置的核心，同样具有 5000 万像素的分辨率和 f/1.4 至 f/2.0 的可变光圈。Honor 智能手机旨在提供出色的效果，尤其是在拍摄移动物体时。在人像模式下拍摄时，还再次配备了哈科特滤镜，效果非常漂亮。另一方面，新的AI 增强人像模式是一个品味问题，因为它会使拍摄对象变得非常平滑，并在美颜滤镜额外激活的情况下模糊细节，例如细小的头发，因此我们建议将其关闭。这样，肖像效果会更好。不过，总的来说，Magic7 Pro 是一款出色的摄影智能手机，在任何光线条件下都能实现良好甚至非常出色的效果。只有我们的兔子图案可以描绘得更细致一些。

Honor Magic7 Pro 上的人工智能肖像
人工智能肖像
比较：有人工智能和没有人工智能
比较：有人工智能和没有人工智能

新的变焦镜头现在拥有强大的 200 万像素分辨率，并且与主传感器一样，支持光学防抖动（OIS）。使用该镜头拍照时，请确保保持足够的距离，否则镜头会吞噬细节。得益于其高分辨率，您可以实现六倍变焦，而且几乎不会降低照片质量。不过，在我们的测试照片中，您已经可以看到，放大 5 倍时细节已无法完美再现。最大放大倍数可达 100 倍。人工智能变焦功能从 30 倍放大率开始生效，可确保获得明显更清晰的效果，完全可以用于社交媒体，但对于打印照片来说，质量并不理想。

手机的超广角镜头也是微距镜头。即使是逆光拍摄，它也能给人留下深刻印象，而且景深很好，只是在边缘处略有减小。

在最佳状态下，背面的主摄像头能以高达 60fps 的速度录制超高清视频。遗憾的是，没有 120fps 或 8k 选项。不过，它支持 LUT 色调，您还可以创建 HDR 录像，但遗憾的是，只能使用 HDR Vivid。图像稳定功能运行良好，而且可以在拍摄过程中切换镜头。

主传感器（24 毫米）
光学变焦（72 毫米）
混合变焦（144 毫米）
AI 变焦（1200 毫米）
变焦（2400 毫米）
比较：带人工智能和不带人工智能的 100 倍变焦

变焦级别（24 - 2400 毫米）

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light
orginal image
click to load images

在可控的照明条件下，拍摄的测试图在图像中心会有少量细节丢失，但令人惊讶的是，边缘并没有出现这种情况。

ColorChecker 的拍摄效果非常自然，DeltaE 偏差始终保持在 9 值以下，堪称典范。

ColorChecker
8.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic7 Pro: 5.46 ∆E min: 1.36 - max: 8.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.9 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic7 Pro: 18.81 ∆E min: 8.87 - max: 28.88 ∆E

配件和保修 - 在欧盟地区不带电源

Honor Magic7 Pro 包装在一个薄薄的纸盒中，这已经表明没有放置电源装置的空间，而事实也确实如此。它的供货范围只包括一个 SIM 卡工具和一条 USB-C 数据线。

这款手机在德国的保修期为 24 个月，不能延长或扩大。

输入设备和操作 - Magic7 Pro 具有一系列生物识别功能

Honor Magic7 Pro 的电容式触摸屏漂亮而流畅，能快速而精确地实现所有输入。它集成了超声波指纹传感器，该传感器上一次出现在 Magic4 Pro 中。保存的指纹识别超快、超准。

此外，您还可以通过前置摄像头旁边的 ToF 传感器使用 3D 面部识别功能。这在安全性和速度方面丝毫不逊色于指纹传感器。为了进一步提高安全性，Magic7 Pro 采用了所谓的分立安全芯片组--Honor S1 安全芯片--可额外保护密码和生物识别数据。

除了常见的指关节手势和单手模式外，Magic7 Pro 还支持无触摸手势。此外，它还新增了眼球跟踪功能，不过目前的用途还很有限。

其集成的线性振动电机可提供触感舒适、清晰的反馈。

显示屏 -Honor Magic 7 Pro 的亮度可达 5,000 尼特

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Honor Magic7 Pro 的 OLED 显示屏与前代产品的规格相似。它支持 1 至 120 Hz 动态刷新率的 LTPO，提供扩展的全高清分辨率，并支持所有 HDR 标准，甚至是 HDR Vivid。

在 Magic6 Pro上，其 5,000cd/m2的峰值亮度仅用于 HDR 照片，但Honor 现在已将其扩展到所有 HDR 内容。在播放 YouTube 上的 HDR 视频时，我们测得的亮度为 4,697cd/m2，非常接近这一规格。在显示全白色显示屏时，我们注意到屏幕中央的亮度为 1,607 cd/m2，非常不错，即使在显示缩小的白色区域（APL18：1,634 cd/m2）时，亮度也几乎没有变化。如果手动调节亮度，最高可达 802cd/m2。

Honor 此外，APL18 还采用了频率高达 4320 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光技术。在最低显示亮度下，我们测得的基本频率较低，为 360 Hz；只有在亮度为 7% 左右时，才能通过示波器看到高频调光。与 Magic V3 一样，新型号的面板也支持散焦刺激功能，并可根据需要根据环境光线调节色调。此外，它现在还采用了圆形偏振光，目的是更加接近自然光，以尽可能保护眼睛。虽然我们不能完全排除敏感用户的不适感，但 Magic7 Pro 出现这种情况的可能性微乎其微。

1596
cd/m²		1637
cd/m²		1650
cd/m²
1573
cd/m²		1607
cd/m²		1610
cd/m²
1568
cd/m²		1611
cd/m²		1632
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1650 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1609.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.44 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1607 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Honor Magic7 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"		Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.8"		Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8"		Xiaomi 15 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Vivo X200 Pro
OLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"
Screen
29%
-56%
-93%
-35%
16%
Brightness middle
1607
2148
34%
1055
-34%
1317
-18%
1016
-37%
1828
14%
Brightness
1609
2050
27%
1061
-34%
1365
-15%
1017
-37%
1828
14%
Brightness Distribution
95
86
-9%
93
-2%
94
-1%
98
3%
94
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
0.5
44%
1.5
-67%
3.4
-278%
1.15
-28%
0.7
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.8
1.4
22%
4.7
-161%
5
-178%
3.57
-98%
1.6
11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
0.8
53%
2.3
-35%
2.8
-65%
1.9
-12%
1.1
35%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2 110%
2.2 100%
2.25 98%
CCT
6346 102%
6582 99%
6625 98%
6458 101%
6677 97%
6520 100%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2944 cd/m² +80%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2747 cd/m² +68%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2521 cd/m² +54%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2357 cd/m² +44%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1634 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4812 cd/m² +2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4697 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2942 cd/m² -37%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2875 cd/m² -39%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2600 cd/m² -45%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 Hz
Amplitude: 13.19 %
Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

我们使用光度计和卡尔曼分析软件检查了显示器的色彩精确度。我们注意到使用 "正常 "色彩模式（色温：标准）时效果最佳，与目标值没有明显偏差。

灰度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5075 ms rise
↘ 0.5035 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.721 ms rise
↘ 0.7845 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

尽管 Magic7 Pro 的 APL 峰值亮度低于某些竞争对手，但Honor 智能手机即使在阳光直射下也始终易于阅读。

Honor Magic7 Pro 外观
外
Honor Magic7 Pro 外观
外

Honor Magic7 Pro 的视角稳定性非常出色。即使在平视角度下，也不会出现色彩倒置，亮度也只是略有下降。

Honor Magic7 Pro 的视角稳定性
Honor Magic7 Pro 的视角稳定性

性能 -Honor Magic7 Pro 内置骁龙 8 精英处理器

Honor Magic7 Pro 配备了 高通骁龙 8 精英版配备 12GB LPDDR5x 内存。因此，它采用的是目前速度最快、功能最全面的 SoC 之一。

与其 前代该机型还可以选择所谓的性能模式。虽然它的效果并不是特别好，但为了更好地展示 SoC 的性能，我们还是在基准测试中永久激活了它。

尽管如此，它的测试结果还是稍稍落后于采用相同芯片组的竞争对手，这可能与手机散热有关。不过，Magic7 Pro 在系统基准测试中表现出色，在现代人工智能基准测试中也取得了不错的成绩。

在日常使用中，性能差异应该不会很明显，你可以放心地关闭性能模式。

Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
3479 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (3001 - 3228, n=7)
3116 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3089 Points +1%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3050 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
2748 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points -25%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1950 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=179, last 2 years)
1486 Points -51%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (9019 - 10401, n=7)
9620 Points +7%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9404 Points +4%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9019 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
8574 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
8568 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4741 Points -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=179, last 2 years)
4170 Points -54%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2474369 - 3015111, n=7)
2718796 Points +10%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
2705165 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2611586 Points +6%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2474369 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points -26%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1739816 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=112, last 2 years)
1298428 Points -48%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (18231 - 27169, n=7)
22281 Points +8%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20630 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points -9%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18231 Points -12%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
15849 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=199, last 2 years)
13257 Points -36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
13235 Points -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2674 Points +18%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2259 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1718 - 2674, n=6)
2212 Points -2%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
1663 Points -26%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1517 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points -36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1081 Points -52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=168, last 2 years)
927 Points -59%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
13729 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
12594 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (9067 - 13729, n=6)
11406 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points -29%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9067 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=162, last 2 years)
6450 Points -53%
System
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19891 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14039 - 19891, n=6)
16507 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points -17%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
16162 Points -19%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14976 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=162, last 2 years)
10302 Points -48%
Memory
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15541 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7873 - 18911, n=6)
13872 Points -11%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
13673 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points -33%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7873 Points -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=162, last 2 years)
7004 Points -55%
Graphics
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
51898 Points +2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
51041 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
44154 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35527 - 51041, n=6)
42856 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
17913 Points -65%
Web
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2252 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
2183 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2363, n=6)
1818 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=162, last 2 years)
1570 Points -30%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1278 Points -43%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
81594 Points +293%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
21254 Points +2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20782 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=6)
18493 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=153, last 2 years)
17650 Points -15%
AImark - Score v3.x
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
52884 Points +2845%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1790 - 307528, n=7)
45564 Points +2437%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
33044 Points +1740%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=145, last 2 years)
24983 Points +1291%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1987 Points +11%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1796 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points -15%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
1543 Points +126%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=43, last 2 years)
782 Points +15%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
682 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (267 - 754, n=4)
524 Points -23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
442 Points -35%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
9476 Points +1296%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4754 Points +600%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=43, last 2 years)
3693 Points +444%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
679 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (271 - 755, n=4)
509 Points -25%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
13068 Points +724%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
6286 Points +296%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=43, last 2 years)
5321 Points +235%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1586 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (641 - 1765, n=4)
1197 Points -25%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=27, last 2 years)
1149 Points +363%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
800 Points +223%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
248 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (137 - 287, n=3)
224 Points -10%
Score V6
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10742 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10739 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
9873 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 10742, n=6)
4046 Points -62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (177 - 10742, n=19, last 2 years)
3019 Points -72%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1057 Points -90%

集成的 Adreno 830作为手机的图形处理器，它支持基于硬件的光线追踪。

我们再次观察到，Honor Magic7 Pro 无法完全跟上竞争者的步伐，生成的帧数总是比预期少几帧。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6521 Points +10%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6417 Points +8%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5933 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4739 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -56%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6567 Points +13%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6432 Points +11%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5800 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4752 Points -18%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2548 Points -56%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
25431 Points +7%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23837 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22987 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
18368 Points -23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9452 Points -60%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
11654 Points +16%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11476 Points +14%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10066 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8146 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7510 Points -25%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
11589 Points +9%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11504 Points +8%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10634 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8620 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8264 Points -22%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2602 Points +16%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2509 Points +12%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2248 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
1715 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1629 Points -28%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1050 Points -53%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2576 Points +13%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2495 Points +10%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2272 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2069 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1796 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1031 Points -55%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
791 fps +25%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
763 fps +21%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
631 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
536 fps -15%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps +35%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps +15%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
368 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
324 fps -12%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
354 fps +20%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps +5%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
225 fps -23%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +5%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +5%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -27%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -47%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps +26%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps +13%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
143 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps -14%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +18%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps +4%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -41%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
129 fps +43%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps +24%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -21%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
56 fps -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps -5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps -42%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps +16%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
276 fps +7%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
257 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps -27%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
184 fps -28%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -54%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps +20%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps +9%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
30 fps -32%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -55%

Honor Magic7 Pro 上网冲浪易如反掌，在基准测试中也取得了不错的成绩。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
353.735 Points +24%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
284.674 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
276.321 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=8)
236 Points -17%
Vivo X200 Pro
234 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=172, last 2 years)
125.7 Points -56%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
557 runs/min +33%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
419 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (342 - 419, n=4)
384 runs/min -8%
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
271 runs/min -35%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
265 runs/min -37%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=154, last 2 years)
145 runs/min -65%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
33.5 runs/min +28%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
28.9 runs/min +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (23.5 - 34, n=7)
27.7 runs/min +6%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
26.1 runs/min
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
17.7 runs/min -32%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=71, last 2 years)
12.1 runs/min -54%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
271 Points +38%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
255 Points +30%
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
225 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (168 - 255, n=6)
209 Points +7%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
196 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
195 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=162, last 2 years)
118.3 Points -40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
100368 Points +12%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
89248 Points
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
86943 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (72825 - 94399, n=7)
86336 Points -3%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
84676 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points -19%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (Chrome 129)
61885 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=213, last 2 years)
38822 Points -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=170, last 2 years)
1512 ms * -252%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms * -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (422 - 574, n=7)
453 ms * -5%
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
431.56 ms * -1%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
429.4 ms *
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
423.11 ms * +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
279.4 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

Magic7 Pro 采用快速 UFS 4.0 闪存，在连续读写速度方面表现出色，但在处理小数据块时比预期的慢。

Honor Magic7 ProGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XLSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraXiaomi 15 ProVivo X200 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
-13%
26%
6%
10%
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB
3910.81
1850.5
-53%
3610.25
-8%
3998.65
2%
2694.85
-31%
3632 ?(1851 - 4512, n=37)
-7%
1883 ?(226 - 4512, n=200, last 2 years)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
3683.81
1280.56
-65%
1893.63
-49%
3673.38
0%
2174.26
-41%
3019 ?(1524 - 3889, n=37)
-18%
1476 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=200, last 2 years)
-60%
Random Read 4KB
282.34
310.88
10%
437.12
55%
409.67
45%
317.29
12%
383 ?(250 - 480, n=37)
36%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=200, last 2 years)
-2%
Random Write 4KB
357.04
398.27
12%
181.55
-49%
555.55
56%
658.43
84%
464 ?(45.7 - 709, n=37)
30%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=200, last 2 years)
-13%

游戏 - 对 Magic7 Pro 而言，稳定的 120fps 完全不成问题

我们使用GameBench对 Magic7 Pro 的游戏性能进行了更详细的测试。Honor 智能手机即使在高细节级别或高帧率下也没有显示出任何限制。坦克世界》在最高细节级别下可以达到 120 帧/秒，《PUBG Mobile》也能以最高 120 帧/秒的速度流畅运行。

遗憾的是，在横屏模式下握持手机时，如果用手遮住环境光传感器，显示屏亮度就会变暗，这就会出现一个小问题。唯一的解决办法是手动调节亮度。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
坦克世界闪电战
坦克世界闪电战
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Honor Magic7 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø117.9 (90-121)
Honor Magic7 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.1 (53-61)
Honor Magic7 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (36-41)
Honor Magic7 Pro; World of Tanks Blitz: Ø120.3 (118-121)

排放 - 压力测试期间过热

温度

Honor Magic7 Pro 的表面温度在持续负载的情况下全面升高，超过 40 °C，某些地方甚至高达 46.3 °C。虽然温度很高，但完全无害。

由于 "Burnout "基准测试可以轻松运行两小时而不会过热，我们没想到 3DMark Solar Bay 压力测试和 "Wild Life Extreme "压力测试都会因过热而终止。其他压力测试的性能也有明显下降，但到目前为止，这并没有对日常使用产生负面影响。

Max. Load
 45.8 °C46.3 °C44.2 °C 
 44.7 °C45 °C43.4 °C 
 42.6 °C43.3 °C42.1 °C 
Maximum: 46.3 °C
Average: 44.2 °C
40.3 °C40.7 °C42.1 °C
40.1 °C41.5 °C41.3 °C
39.3 °C41.1 °C39.8 °C
Maximum: 42.1 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
94.6 % +64%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.3 % +31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.5 % +21%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.1 % -20%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40.8 % -29%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.1 % +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.6 % +12%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.5 % +12%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
73.4 % +7%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.4 %
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.5 % -17%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø96 (74.7-129.7)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (56.7-59.9)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.5 (96.3-128)
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64 (49.8-122.2)
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (11.3-16.6)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø10.9 (10.6-14.4)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15.2 (13.9-18.1)
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.1 (10.3-18.2)

发言人

Magic7 Pro 的两个扬声器音质不错。不过，音质在高音量时会明显下降，尤其是高音有些过载。即便如此，对于智能手机来说，音质还是不错的。

通过 USB-C 可以建立有线音频连接，而蓝牙（支持最常见的音频编解码器）则可提供无线连接。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.133.72532.731.93128.926.84025.227.95033.139.96320.926.58015.930.610017.535.512513.344.716014.956.420012.45325010.853.531511.958.44009.660.550010.267.16309.970.48009.771.2100010.275125011.377.3160010.677200011.378.6250011.779.831501279.3400012.380.3500012.878.7630013.477.2800013.173.91000013.771.71250013.365.31600015.158.7SPL2489.3N0.577.5median 12median 71.7Delta1.49.536.246.130.739.625.643.926.742.836.743.624.644.317.64618.743.218.245.715.956.617.356.115.260.214.160.413.461.313.866.514.367.713.774.912.478.112.778.612.177.212.981.612.584.612.284.112.88413.18413.578.513.176.913.7741466.813.36425.2930.792.2median 13.5median 74.91.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Magic7 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 欧盟机型电池容量较小

耗电量

Honor Magic7 Pro 的功耗在最低显示亮度下可能会稍低一些，但除此之外，该设备还是比较省电的。不过，在调整亮度的测试中，它比采用相同 SoC 的小米 15 Pro 需要更多的电量。

Honor Magic7 Pro 通过数据线充电的功率可达 100 瓦。在我们的测试中，使用原装电源适配器充满一次电仅需 31 分钟（15 分钟后为 55%），但还必须通过按住动画来激活充电增强功能。否则，Magic7 Pro 会降低充电速度，以节省电池。充满电需要 1 小时 9 分钟（50%：13 分钟，80%：25 分钟）。

您还可以以高达 80 瓦的功率为手机进行无线充电。在这种情况下，Honor 智能手机正好需要 40 分钟（52%：19 分钟）。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.94 / 1.5 / 1.57 Watt
Load midlight 11.03 / 11.68 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh		Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
5060 mAh		Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 15 Pro
6100 mAh		Vivo X200 Pro
6000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
24%
-7%
33%
7%
5%
12%
Idle Minimum *
0.94
0.48
49%
0.42
55%
0.73
22%
0.6
36%
0.43
54%
0.782 ?(0.5 - 0.99, n=6)
17%
0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years)
6%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.53
-2%
1.55
-3%
1.22
19%
0.9
40%
1.76
-17%
1.398 ?(0.9 - 2.06, n=6)
7%
1.464 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
1.86
-18%
1.58
-1%
1.34
15%
1.1
30%
1.83
-17%
1.482 ?(1.1 - 2.1, n=6)
6%
1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years)
-3%
Load Average *
11.03
3.41
69%
16.52
-50%
6.7
39%
9.58
13%
9.72 ?(6.7 - 13, n=6)
12%
6.63 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years)
40%
Load Maximum *
11.68
11.82
-1%
16.58
-42%
9.5
19%
11.43
2%
13.4 ?(9.3 - 19.2, n=6)
-15%
9.96 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.39 (1.043-11.7)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.51 (0.64-9.38)
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.012 (0.876-1.149)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.4 (11.1-11.7)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.37 (9.34-9.41)
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.012 (0.876-1.149)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

运行时间

Honor Magic7 Pro 使用所谓的第三代硅碳电池。严格来说，这是一种基于锂的储能设备，但阳极是由硅碳合金制成的，从而实现了更轻薄的设计、更高的能量密度和更长的使用寿命。Honor 声称五年后的剩余容量至少为 80%。

遗憾的是，欧盟国家机型的电池容量小于世界其他地区，因此我们的测试设备 "只有 "5270 毫安时，而不是 5850 毫安时。但奇怪的是，重量却没有差别。

它的电池续航时间仍然非常出色，即使与 Magic6 Pro(5,600 mAh)。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
42h 07min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 131)
24h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
30h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 37min
Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh		Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
5060 mAh		Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 15 Pro
6100 mAh		Vivo X200 Pro
6000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-33%
32%
-9%
16%
-5%
Reader / Idle
2527
4226
67%
2227
-12%
3093
22%
H.264
1806
1990
10%
1922
6%
2226
23%
WiFi v1.3
1481
998
-33%
1249
-16%
1148
-22%
1444
-2%
1404
-5%
Load
217
357
65%
202
-7%
264
22%

Notebookcheck 总评分

虽然Honor Magic7 Pro 在我们的测试中表现出了一些弱点和功能上的不足，但它的整体性能还是很不错的，尤其是它的摄像头令人印象深刻。

Honor Magic7 Pro - 01/10/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
69 / 69 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
94%
Display
93%
Games Performance
40 / 55 → 73%
Application Performance
84 / 85 → 99%
AI Performance
51%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
87%
Average
70%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
45%
Power Use
98.2%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
78%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 47.7%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor Magic7 Pro 评测--功能强大的拍照智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-01-17 (Update: 2025-01-17)