Notebookcheck Logo

Honor Magic6 Pro 评测--拥有神奇电池续航能力的智能手机

神奇的高端替代品

Honor Magic6 Pro 是该制造商的高端智能手机，在性能、显示屏、电池续航时间和摄像头方面都有很强的综合实力。不过，我们也发现了幸福路上的一些小绊脚石。在测试中了解一切。
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Honor Magic6 Pro 是继 Magic5 Pro的继任者，该产品去年给人留下了深刻印象，但也暴露出一些弱点。这些弱点包括：SoC 冷却效果一般、缺乏 UWB 和 6 GHz WLAN。

Magic6 Pro 设计新颖，处理器速度更快，还提供了高端智能手机应具备的许多其他功能。尤其是超亮显示屏、首次采用潜望式变焦的 1800 万像素强大摄像头设置以及采用硅碳技术的大容量电池。

Honor Magic6 Pro 仅在欧洲推出一个存储版本（12/512 GB），建议零售价为 1300 欧元。

Honor Magic6 Pro (Magic6 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 19.69:9, 2800 x 1280 pixel 453 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, NanoCrystal Shield, 4320 Hz PWM-Dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 486.57 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Rotation, Gyroscope, Barometer, geomagnetic Sensor, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 162.5 x 75.8
Battery
5600 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon (2. Gen)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (1/1.3", f/1.4-2.0, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide / Macro, 122°, 2.5 cm, f/2.0, AF) + 180 MPix (2.5x opt. Zoom, f/2.6, OIS); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0, FF) + 3D-ToF
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, MagicOS 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision; DRM Widevine L1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
229 g
Price
1300 Euro
Amazon
$834.50
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
90.6 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Honor Magic6 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2800x1280
91.1 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750		232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3120x1440
89 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
90.7 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU		187 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2556x1179
89.8 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi 14
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		193 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"2670x1200

Honor Magic6 Pro 有黑色和 Epi-Green 两种颜色。与上一代产品相比，它重了 10 克，稍窄了一些，也高了一些。不过，手感仍然不错。

制造质量令人印象深刻。虽然高光铝合金边框容易沾染指纹，但它赋予了Honor 智能手机高度的稳定性。在试图扭动它时，听不到任何破裂或吱吱作响的声音。Honor 声称，它可以承受从 1.5 米高处跌落到粗糙表面（如沥青），甚至从两米高处跌落到木质表面而不受损害。间隙狭窄而均匀。

Magic6 Pro 还通过了 IP68 防尘防水认证。因此，它既防尘又防水。

尺寸比较

❌
162.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.77 mm 219 g162.5 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 229 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g152.8 mm 71.5 mm 8.2 mm 193 g146.6 mm 70.6 mm 8.3 mm 187 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - USB 3.2 和红外触发器

Magic6 Pro 有一个快速 USB 3.2 端口（Gen.1），借助 USB OTG，它还可以使用外部外设和存储介质。后者可以用 FAT、FAT32、exFAT 或 NTFS 格式化。在使用外置硬盘（华硕 ROG Strix Arion 中的三星 980 Pro，USB 3.2 Gen.2）进行的复制测试中，Honor 智能手机的平均速度达到了 249.78 MB/s。该端口还可以进行有线图像传输，包括可选的桌面模式。

无线图像传输支持 Miracast 和 Cast+。除 NFC 外，Magic6 Pro 顶部还集成了一个红外发射器，可用于远程控制电视、接收器、空调系统或摄像头等兼容设备。

不过，Magic6 Pro 仍然没有超宽带芯片（UWB），蓝牙 5.3 也不是最新版本，这意味着缺少现代蓝牙 LE 和 LC3 编解码器。Auracast 也尚未集成到系统中。

顶部：扬声器、红外热像仪、麦克风
顶部：扬声器、红外热像仪、麦克风
左边
左边
右：音量、功率
右：音量、功率
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡

软件 - MagicOS 8.0 和五年更新

Magic6 Pro 配备了谷歌Android 14，Honor ，在此基础上运行自己的 MagicOS 8.0 用户界面（UI）。人工智能功能也是Honor 的核心，特别是所谓的 Magic Portal（见下面的视频）。它允许将显示屏上的内容拖放到屏幕边缘，系统会根据所选内容推荐合适的应用程序。电子邮件或浏览器中的地址可以拖放到谷歌地图上，以便立即导航。而照片则可以直接拖动到合适的社交媒体应用或销售平台。这在日常生活中已经非常有效，而且节省了时间。

基于 Llama 2 的本地 LLM（大语言模型）稍后将通过更新提供。其工作原理与 ChatGPT 和 Co.在 MWC 上展示的眼球控制功能也尚未定型，但也将通过更新提供。

除了常见的系统应用外，Honor 还安装了一些第三方应用，如 Facebook、TikTok 和 WPS Office，但这些应用都可以卸载。Magic6 Pro 将每月提供为期五年的安全补丁。这款智能手机还将获得总共四次重大更新，即最多Android 18。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Wi-Fi 7，但无 6 GHz 频段

移动互联网用户拥有广泛的频段组合，而 5G Sub6 也支持最新标准。

在 Wi-Fi 方面也是如此，Magic6 Pro 支持 Wi-Fi 7（IEEE 802.11 a、b、g、n、ac、ax、be），但仅限于 2.4 和 5.0 GHz 双频操作。Honor 智能手机不支持干扰较少的快速 6.0 GHz 频段。我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 的传输速率相对较低，因为 Magic6 Pro 最多只能使用 Wi-Fi 6。

随后，我们使用 TP-Link Archer BE800 测试了在 5 GHz 范围内与 Wi-Fi 7 的连接。稳定性同样很高，而且智能手机的数据传输速率明显更高，平均为 1,638 MBit/s（发送）和 1,643 MBit/s（接收）。在峰值时，发送速度甚至可达每秒 1,966 MBit。

Networking
Honor Magic6 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
806 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
904 (min: 308) MBit/s ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
556 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 815) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1461 (min: 1284) MBit/s ∼84%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼84%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1449 (min: 1287) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1198 (min: 1116) MBit/s ∼69%
Xiaomi 14
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1502) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1716 (min: 1119) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1597) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1737 (min: 873) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼80%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1738 (1597-1857)
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1705 (873-1765)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø792 (404-816)
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1622 (1502-1707)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø904 (308-988)
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1716 (1119-1807)
GPS 测试：户外
室外
GPS 测试：建筑物内
楼内

在户外，Magic6 Pro 可以非常快速、准确地定位用户。在室内，定位时间稍长，但精确度仍然不错。

在骑车时，我们将路线跟踪的准确性与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表进行了比较。两款设备的运行都不是完美无瑕的，但它们非常接近，而Honor 智能手机在转弯点的精确度甚至更高一些。它还能提供非常准确的海拔值。

全球导航卫星系统试车：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统试车：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统试车：转折点
全球导航卫星系统试车：转折点
全球导航卫星系统试运行：总结
全球导航卫星系统试运行：总结

电话功能和语音质量

Honor Magic6 Pro 支持双信使应用、VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话，可容纳两张 nanoSIM 卡。第二张 SIM 卡可以停用，转而使用 eSIM 卡，两张激活的 SIM 卡均可使用 5G，但如果其中一张 SIM 卡接收信号不佳，则无法自动切换移动数据。

将手机贴在耳边时，语音质量非常自然，即使是干扰性较强的噪音，也能可靠地过滤掉大部分环境噪音。扬声器模式不仅音质优美，而且麦克风的通话距离也很长。即使在距离智能手机将近四米的地方，我们仍然很容易听懂，但听起来有点刺耳。

摄像头 - 5000 万像素和 1.8 亿像素的三倍像素，可满足多种需求

与Honor Magic6 Pro 自拍
与Honor Magic6 Pro 自拍

Honor Magic6 Pro 的前置摄像头拥有 5000 万像素的高分辨率，并采用了像素分档技术，因此拍摄的照片大小约为 1200 万像素。视频可录制为最高 30 FPS 的超高清和最高 60 FPS 的全高清。尽管没有自动对焦功能，但图像非常均衡，甚至在光线条件不太理想的情况下也能给人留下深刻印象。

据Honor 称，Magic6 Pro 的所有传感器都来自 OmniVision，是通过独家合作开发的。主传感器的分辨率为 5000 万像素，可以依靠光学防抖（OIS）。可变光圈可在 f/1.4 和 f/2.0 之间自动切换，以最佳方式适应光线条件。拍摄效果令人印象深刻。在日光下，Magic6 Pro 丰富的对比度和迷人的动态范围给人留下了深刻印象。在弱光环境下，也能拍摄出相对较好的照片，尽管 像素 8 Pro在夜间模式下的轮廓更加清晰。反过来，由于白平衡更暖，我们发现调色更加和谐。此外，Pixel 8 Pro 还为移动拍摄对象集成了特殊的运动模式，该模式不仅可以使用特别快的快门速度，还可以在按下快门钮之前捕捉图像，以便通过算法创建尽可能动态和锐利的图像。这对拍摄人物非常有效，但拍摄较小的物体则比较困难。

微距拍摄
微距拍摄
微距拍摄
微距拍摄

超广角也可以达到 5000 万像素，并且还提供微距功能。Honor ，这里还使用了像素二进制技术，但这并不总是对照片有利，因为照片边缘可能会变得浑浊，图像中心的锐度也不理想。更新后，这种情况应该会得到改善。

事实上，全新的潜望镜相机还具备微距功能，并提供破纪录的 180 万像素和 2.5 倍光学放大率，包括 OIS。甚至可以通过数字方式实现 100 倍放大。Magic6 Pro 的光学成像性能确实很好，即使是 5 倍混合变焦，也能提供令人信服的效果，但从 10 倍放大率开始，质量就会急剧下降。 Galaxy S24 Ultra的效果明显更好。尽管如此，Magic6 Pro 的成像效果在社交媒体或拍摄远处物体时还是非常有用的。虽然图像稳定功能非常有效，但在较长的焦距下往往会显得生涩。

13 毫米（可选）
13 毫米（可选）
27 毫米（可选）
27 毫米（可选）
68 毫米（可选）
68 毫米（可选）
135 毫米（数字）
135 毫米（数字）
270 毫米（数字）
1350 毫米（数字）
2700 毫米（数字）
2700 毫米（数字）

Honor 手机最多能以 60 FPS 的超高清速度录制视频，包括 HDR。如果要使用超级夜间模式，则会降低到 24 FPS。在电影模式下，还可以录制动态范围更大的 LOG 视频，但无论如何都必须进行后期处理。不过，这也可以直接在 Magic6 Pro 上完成。不过，Honor 采用了可选的 21:9 格式。它并没有在宽度上增加更多像素，而是简单地降低了图像高度，因此所谓的 4K 录像只使用了 3,840 x 1,644 像素，而不是 5,120 x 2,160 像素。因此，录制质量确实不错。

模式 高宽比 分辨率
照片 全图、1:1、4:3 12 / 5000 万像素
专业版（RAW/JPG-L） 4:3 5000 万像素
专业版（JPG） 全屏、1:1、4:3 1200 万像素
视频 16:9、21:9 高清（30/60 FPS）、全高清（30/60 FPS）、超高清（30/60 FPS）
电影 16:9、21:9 全高清（24/30/60 FPS）、超高清（24/30/60 FPS）
慢动作 16:9 全高清（120 / 240 FPS）

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light

在受控照明条件下，Honor Magic6 Pro 的清晰度非常均衡、均匀。ColorChecker 显示较高的 DeltaE 偏差，尤其是在蓝色调方面，导致饱和度过高。灰阶也略微过暗和过暖。

ColorChecker
12.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic6 Pro: 11.43 ∆E min: 6.8 - max: 16.27 ∆E
ColorChecker
18 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
22 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
17 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic6 Pro: 24.27 ∆E min: 12.33 - max: 36.41 ∆E

配件和保修 - Magic6 Pro 不带电源适配器

Magic6 Pro 的供货范围仅包括一条 USB 线（Type-A 转 Type-C）和一个 SIM 卡工具。电源适配器必须作为选件购买。

支持Honor 智能手机快速充电标准的合适电源适配器售价为 17 欧元起。合适的手机壳也在这个价格范围内。

Magic6 Pro 在德国的保修期为 24 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 仍采用 3D 人脸识别技术

Magic6 Pro 的电容式触摸屏由出厂时安装的贴膜保护。虽然它的滑动性能也不错，但玻璃表面更胜一筹。输入总是能够快速而精确地执行。

显示屏上的光学指纹扫描仪确保了生物识别的安全性。它的识别率非常高，能快速解锁智能手机。此外，还可通过前置摄像头和邻近的 ToF 传感器进行 3D 面部识别，这在速度和安全性方面都无需任何妥协。用户的手指和面部数据都存储在智能手机本地，并受到专用Honor S1 安全芯片组的保护。

线性振动电机可提供清晰明显的触觉反馈，而且声音不大。Magic6 Pro 还提供指关节手势、单手模式、非触摸手势等功能。

显示屏 - 很少能达到 5000 cd/m²

RGGB 子像素结构
RGGB 子像素结构
在最低亮度下闪烁
在最低亮度下闪烁
亮度为 10 % 时闪烁
亮度为 10 % 时闪烁

Honor Magic6 Pro 的 6.8 英寸 LTPO OLED 显示屏提供扩展的全高清分辨率，可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节刷新率。凭借杜比视界（Dolby Vision），它现在支持所有现代 HDR 标准。

不出所料，亮度也比上一代产品有所提高，在激活环境光传感器的纯白显示屏上，平均亮度达到 1508 cd/m²，符合制造商的规格要求。在 APL18 测量中，屏幕中央的亮度降至 1,445 cd/m²，在播放 YouTube HDR 时，我们无法测量到超过 1,385 cd/m²的亮度，这与宣称的 5,000 cd/m² 峰值亮度相去甚远。当被问及此事时，Honor 证实这是 HDR 照片的峰值亮度。

如果手动调节亮度，最高亮度可达 778 cd/m²。最低亮度相当低，但 2.59 cd/m² 的亮度仍然相当高，尤其是在黑暗中。设置中还提供了可选的昼夜显示功能，它可以控制显示屏的色温，减轻眼睛疲劳。

高达 4,320 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光功能与此一脉相承，不过它只能在手动调节显示屏亮度约 15% 时才能充分发挥作用。特别是在最低亮度时，亮度会明显降低，我们还能检测到 360 Hz 高振幅的低频闪烁。我们可以排除时间抖动的原因。这可能是一种频率相对较高的黑框插入（BFI），用于减少运动模糊和防止显示器烧毁。在以固定变焦水平进行的一系列测量中，最低亮度时的振幅曲线看起来非常平缓，但这是由于缩放造成的；信息框中可以看到 15% 时振幅的放大图。对于敏感的人来说，不能完全排除不适感，但很难找到一款更容易让眼睛感到舒适的 OLED。

1517
cd/m²		1511
cd/m²		1412
cd/m²
1579
cd/m²		1575
cd/m²		1428
cd/m²
1591
cd/m²		1535
cd/m²		1427
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1591 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1508.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.59 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 1575 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Honor Magic6 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8"		Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.7"		Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"		Xiaomi 14
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"		Honor Magic5 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"
Screen
-27%
11%
16%
5%
-10%
Brightness middle
1575
1317
-16%
1510
-4%
1092
-31%
1043
-34%
1291
-18%
Brightness
1508
1365
-9%
1467
-3%
1086
-28%
1052
-30%
1289
-15%
Brightness Distribution
89
94
6%
92
3%
99
11%
96
8%
96
8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.7
3.4
-100%
1.1
35%
0.91
46%
1.1
35%
1.7
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
5
-28%
3.8
3%
1.95
50%
2.8
28%
4.4
-13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
2.8
-17%
1.7
29%
1.3
46%
1.9
21%
2.9
-21%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2 110%
2.23 99%
2.215 99%
2.23 99%
2.28 96%
CCT
6398 102%
6458 101%
6670 97%
6481 100%
6740 96%
6472 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

我们使用照相光谱仪和卡尔曼分析软件来检查 Magic6 Pro 显示器显示色彩的自然程度。我们在预设标准色温的自然色彩模式下获得了最佳效果。

面板总体校准良好，但灰阶中略微偏绿，浅肤色会出现明显偏差。不过，这在日常使用中并不会造成困扰。

灰度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6765 ms rise
↘ 0.607 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6415 ms rise
↘ 0.8695 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

对于户外使用，Honor Magic 6 Pro 有足够的亮度储备，即使在晴天也能轻松阅读。显示屏上的反光最多会令人讨厌。

Magic6 Pro 户外
Magic6 Pro 户外

Honor Magic6 Pro 的可视角度稳定性不错。在平视角度下，亮度略有下降，并有微弱的蓝绿色偏色。

视角Honor Magic6 Pro
视角Honor Magic6 Pro

性能 - Magic6 Pro 中的骁龙 8 代 3

配备 骁龙 8 代 3Honor Magic6 Pro 采用了高通公司最强大的 SoC。它可以使用 12 GB LPDDR5x RAM。与其他Honor 智能手机一样，这款手机也有性能模式。不过，在 Geekbench 中，两者的差异微乎其微；在 GPU 较重的任务中，充其量只能提高百分之几的性能。

在基准测试中，Magic6 Pro 达到了预期水平，并一直保持良好的成绩。这一点尤其适用于 AImark，在 AImark 中，Honor ，这是迄今为止我们测试过的智能手机中唯一达到高通公司规定分数的手机。

系统性能高于平均水平，在日常使用中显示流畅。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | PCMark for Android | Antutu v10 | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2138 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1716 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1684 Points +2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1654 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1343 - 1702, n=14)
1652 Points 0%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1486 Points -10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6426 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6307 Points +2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6157 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=14)
6058 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
5305 Points -14%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4846 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -44%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2900 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points +8%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2144 Points +1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2127 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=21)
2106 Points -1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1985 Points -7%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -30%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7200 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points +5%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6914 Points +2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6765 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=21)
6638 Points -2%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5119 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -38%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points +3%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18155 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 21628, n=20)
17861 Points -2%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17620 Points -3%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15550 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points -35%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2050639 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1980553 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1390723 - 2162423, n=17)
1934946 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1505982 Points -27%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1398472 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -36%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points -46%
CrossMark - Overall
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1474 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1402 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (983 - 1474, n=13)
1238 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1165 Points -21%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
992 Points -33%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -38%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10480 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10370 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8148 - 10966, n=16)
9947 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points -7%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
9585 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -38%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points +10%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15741 Points +5%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14961 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 16015, n=16)
13995 Points -6%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
13642 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -31%
Memory
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11252 Points +2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11039 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (7426 - 12716, n=16)
10611 Points -4%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10467 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -36%
Graphics
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
35448 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (26972 - 39727, n=16)
34142 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
31876 Points -10%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
29649 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -49%
Web
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2060 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2048 Points -1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1994 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=16)
1962 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -23%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18370 Points +1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18147 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (11487 - 18370, n=15)
16446 Points -9%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
11338 Points -38%
AImark - Score v3.x
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
245629 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (963 - 245629, n=14)
101518 Points -59%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
31531 Points -87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points -90%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points -99%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1381 Points -99%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1266 Points -99%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -100%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
678 Points +2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
663 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (378 - 663, n=6)
555 Points -16%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1478 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1070 - 1478, n=6)
1301 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1254 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points -50%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1317 Points +2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1292 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1141 - 1342, n=6)
1227 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points -36%

钛 Adreno 750提供高性能，可能是目前最快的智能手机 GPU。在现代 Vulkan 基准测试中，Magic6 Pro 在性能模式下取得了非常好的成绩，实际上比竞争对手多生成了几帧。而在使用较早的 OpenGL ES API 时，这一优势就不复存在了。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5167 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points -7%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4729 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
3815 Points -26%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3595 Points -30%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points -3%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4744 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
4239 Points -18%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3687 Points -29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points +3%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19545 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19319 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
15577 Points -20%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13827 Points -29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -54%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8677 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8264 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7510 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
6827 Points -21%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5329 Points -39%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8689 Points 0%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8679 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8620 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
5946 Points -31%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5271 Points -39%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7939 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7451 Points +8%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6883 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6231 Points -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32235 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29081 Points +20%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24707 Points +2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24304 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points -43%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19187 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17677 Points +14%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15555 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14893 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps +1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
544 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
538 fps -1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
350.2 fps -36%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps +4%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
327 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps -20%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
209.2 fps -36%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -4%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
264 fps +1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -5%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
206 fps -21%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
147.7 fps -43%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +9%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -18%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -30%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -41%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps -12%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps -23%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
111.2 fps -31%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps -22%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -32%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -35%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -21%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -33%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps -5%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps -24%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
228 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
124 fps -46%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps -46%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -57%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps -5%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps -10%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
19.6 fps -53%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -62%

上网冲浪感觉很流畅，但使用预装的 Chrome 浏览器进行的基准测试结果却相当一般，有时甚至比 Magic5 Pro.

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
351.1 Points +200%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
215.569 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=19)
152.3 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +6%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
117.078 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
116.696 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -10%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
196 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
195 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=15)
161.7 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +5%
Honor Magic6 Pro
112 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points -8%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
98 Points -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
89112 Points +139%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points +93%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
68454 Points +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=19)
50413 Points +35%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points +33%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
39825 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +4%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
37221 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -32%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
1153.9 ms *
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
981.4 ms * +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (546 - 2066, n=16)
841 ms * +27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * +27%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
623.9 ms * +46%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms * +48%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro (Chrome 117)
388.1 ms * +66%

* ... smaller is better

集成的 UFS 4.0 内存不仅速度快，而且连接速度极快。相比之下，竞争对手即使使用同类型内存，在某些地方也显得很慢。

Honor Magic6 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraGoogle Pixel 8 ProXiaomi 14Honor Magic5 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-31%
-70%
-12%
-34%
-16%
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
3923.31
3610.25
-8%
1501.13
-62%
3385.74
-14%
3344.12
-15%
3625 ?(1851 - 4512, n=36)
-8%
1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
3678.35
1893.63
-49%
257.28
-93%
2906.65
-21%
2651.87
-28%
3001 ?(1524 - 3889, n=36)
-18%
1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
-60%
Random Read 4KB
415.68
437.12
5%
156.16
-62%
420.99
1%
267.91
-36%
386 ?(250 - 480, n=36)
-7%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
-33%
Random Write 4KB
678.39
181.55
-73%
258.92
-62%
594.78
-12%
298.31
-56%
467 ?(45.7 - 709, n=36)
-31%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
-54%

游戏 - 小妥协带来流畅的游戏体验

钛 Adreno 750Honor Magic6 Pro 中的 Adreno 750 可确保强大的游戏性能，并支持包括光线追踪在内的所有现代图形 API。通过GameBench我们对选定的游戏进行了更详细的分析。

Asphalt 9》和《PUBG Mobile》可以最高的细节级别显示，然后分别以 60 和 40 FPS 的速度稳定运行。没有明显的卡顿现象。在《PUBG》中，Extreme+刷新率显示在最低细节级别的设置中，这表明这是 90 FPS 模式，但远非如此--即使使用这些设置，也不可能超过 60 FPS。暗黑破坏神不朽》无法使用 "超"（Ultra）设置，而在低设置下，帧数虽然很高，但也有明显的下降。不过，没有任何明显的卡顿。

对于大多数人来说，这款显卡的游戏性能完全够用；只有那些真正想在技术上穷尽一切可能的热血玩家，才会在玩要求苛刻的游戏时遇到一些小限制。

暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Honor Magic6 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends: Ø59.4 (52-61)
Honor Magic6 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.4 (52-61)
Honor Magic6 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.1.0: Ø59 (52-61)
Honor Magic6 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.1.0: Ø39.4 (34-41)
Honor Magic6 Pro; Diablo Immortal; 2.2.3: Ø59.3 (45-61)

排放 -Honor 配备良好扬声器的智能手机

温度

在恒定负载的情况下（我们用烧毁基准进行了模拟），表面温度在某些地方会上升到相当高的 48.2 °C。虽然温度很高，但仍然无害。

SoC 产生的废热并没有通过Honor 得到最佳散热。在 3DMark 压力测试中，Magic6 Pro 也面临着类似的高性能损失，就像其他搭载 骁龙 8 代 3.但在 Wild Life Unlimited 测试中，Magic6 Pro 的性能却出奇地稳定。

Max. Load
 46.2 °C46.5 °C42.5 °C 
 48.2 °C47.6 °C46.5 °C 
 47 °C47.9 °C46.4 °C 
Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 46.5 °C
40.2 °C41.5 °C40.2 °C
40 °C41.1 °C40.1 °C
37.1 °C40.9 °C41.8 °C
Maximum: 41.8 °C
Average: 40.3 °C
Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
84.9 % +82%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % +69%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.1 % -1%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40.8 % -13%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
95.9 % +99%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % +58%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.4 % +17%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 %
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.9 % -2%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
88.9 % +86%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 % +49%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.1 % +42%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.9 % +13%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47.8 %
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Honor Magic6 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23 (15-31.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.3 (17.6-31.2)
Honor Magic6 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø74.2 (51.2-109.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø61 (47.5-102.9)
Honor Magic6 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø114.7 (110.2-116.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø87.8 (72-121.8)
Honor Magic6 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø25.1 (14-29.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.1 (16.3-31.3)
Honor Magic6 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø25.7 (13.8-28.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.6 (13.8-25.6)

发言人

Magic6 Pro 的两个扬声器提供了相对较好的声音背景，即使是低音也相对清晰。在中等音量下，声音非常悦耳，也适合长时间聆听，但在室内使用时就会达到极限。这是因为声音变得有些尖锐，高音盖过了低音。

声音还可以通过 USB-C 进行有线输出，同时也可以通过蓝牙进行无线输出。遗憾的是，在Honor 网站上无法读取编解码器，因此我们只能依靠制造商的规格说明。不过，这些编解码器仅限于少数几种，而且缺少 LC3 或 aptX Adaptive 等现代编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.241.12530.727.33125.622.34026.727.85036.737.26324.630.58017.62210018.732.312518.244.416015.957.120017.357.925015.260.331514.157.940013.458.550013.864.663014.366.380013.770.8100012.474.4125012.775.1160012.172.4200012.975.3250012.578315012.275.9400012.879.4500013.177.8630013.576.2800013.175.31000013.776.5125001470.71600013.359.8SPL25.287.7N0.772.4median 13.5median 72.4Delta1.28.236.246.130.739.625.643.926.742.836.743.624.644.317.64618.743.218.245.715.956.617.356.115.260.214.160.413.461.313.866.514.367.713.774.912.478.112.778.612.177.212.981.612.584.612.284.112.88413.18413.578.513.176.913.7741466.813.36425.2930.792.2median 13.5median 74.91.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Magic6 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic6 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - Magic6 Pro 的神奇续航能力

耗电量

Magic6 Pro 的功耗处于均衡水平。负载值相当接近，这是因为 CPU 和 GPU 的性能在同时 100% 使用时受到了限制。

Magic6 Pro 的有线充电功率可达 80 瓦，无线充电功率可达 66 瓦--前提是使用正确的充电器。这意味着Honor 的充电速度比 Magic5 Pro(66/50 瓦）相比，充电速度有所提高。在满功率的情况下，Magic6 Pro 的有线充电时间为 51 分钟（50%：20 分钟，80%：33 分钟）；无线充电的测试时间为 72 分钟（50%：14 分钟，80%：34 分钟）。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.36 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.32 / 1.37 Watt
Load midlight 11.62 / 11.65 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro
3274 mAh		Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
10%
25%
29%
7%
4%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.73
9%
0.63
21%
0.7
12%
0.51
36%
0.859 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=15)
-7%
0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.32
1.22
8%
1.47
-11%
0.9
32%
0.89
33%
1.231 ?(0.81 - 1.9, n=15)
7%
1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
-10%
Idle Maximum *
1.37
1.34
2%
1.55
-13%
1.1
20%
0.92
33%
1.363 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=15)
1%
1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
-17%
Load Average *
11.62
16.52
-42%
8.45
27%
6
48%
9.08
22%
8.74 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=14)
25%
6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years)
43%
Load Maximum *
11.65
16.58
-42%
8.63
26%
10.1
13%
9.11
22%
10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=14)
7%
9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.75 (0.1675-19.9)
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.99 (0.642-9.1)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.949 (0.822-1.242)
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.653 (0.601-1.034)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.5 (9.47-11.5)
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.99 (8.91-9.05)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.949 (0.822-1.242)
Xiaomi 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.653 (0.601-1.034)

电池寿命

5,600 mAh 电池采用硅碳技术，以更小的电池体积储存更密集的能量。这项技术还能延长电池的使用寿命。

在测试中，除了满负荷运行外，Magic6 Pro 的运行速度领先于竞争对手。尤其是在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的情况下，运行时间非常出色。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
58h 39min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 122)
25h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
33h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 43min
Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro
3274 mAh		Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh		Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-19%
-40%
-8%
-10%
-18%
Reader / Idle
3519
2227
-37%
1344
-62%
2714
-23%
2926
-17%
2580
-27%
H.264
2027
1922
-5%
1122
-45%
1522
-25%
1674
-17%
1249
-38%
WiFi v1.3
1548
1148
-26%
760
-51%
832
-46%
1092
-29%
1074
-31%
Load
223
202
-9%
220
-1%
362
62%
277
24%
276
24%

Pros

+ 出色的电池续航时间
+ 良好的摄像头设置
+ 精确定位
+ 3D 人脸识别
+ 功能全面

Cons

- 缺少专业视频模式
- 蓝牙音频编解码器数量少
- 没有 6 GHz 无线局域网
- 只有蓝牙 5.3

结论 - Magic6 Pro 需要进行大量微调

回顾： Honor Magic6 Pro。测试设备由Honor Global 提供。
回顾： Honor Magic6 Pro。测试设备由Honor Global 提供。

Honor Magic6 Pro 成功地进一步开发了其旗舰智能手机。在测试中，超长的电池续航时间尤其令人印象深刻。此外，Magic6 Pro 的功能还包括快速充电、IP68 认证、USB 3.2（包括图像输出和桌面模式）、红外发射器、5G、Wi-Fi 7、eSIM 支持和强大的摄像头设置。

Honor Magic6 Pro 是一款优秀的高端智能手机，几乎能让用户满意。

不过，Magic6 Pro 也并非十全十美。在一款高端设备中只提供双频无线局域网，这在去年已经不合时宜了。我们不明白为什么 选择了更先进的蓝牙 5.4。我们还希望采用 UWB。对于摄像师来说，相机还应该提供更多的设置选项，而且缺少 120 FPS 的 UHD 或 8k 视频。

因此，Magic6 Pro 是目前能买到的最好的智能手机之一。强劲的替代产品有Honor 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra, 小米 14或 谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

Magic6 Pro 可直接从Honor但也可在亚马逊或MediaMarkt 购买。

Honor Magic6 Pro - 03/22/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
71 / 70 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
96%
Display
92%
Games Performance
73 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
80%
Average
86%
91%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor Magic6 Pro 评测--拥有神奇电池续航能力的智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-03-25 (Update: 2024-08-15)