Notebookcheck Logo
(Bildquelle: Alexander Wätzel)

采用保时捷设计和改进技术的智能手机 -Honor Magic7 RSR 评测

没有 iPhone 的激光雷达

最新版 Magic7 Pro 的外观再次由保时捷设计公司开发。不过,Honor Magic7 RSR 提供的不仅仅是改良的外形,它还设置了更多的技术亮点。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

结论:设计升级,价值增值

保时捷设计| Honor Magic7 RSR 在技术上与 Magic7 Pro 非常相似,是一款非常出色的高端智能手机。不过,除了灵感源自保时捷的设计外,它还提供了两倍的内存、更大的交付范围、改进的激光雷达自动对焦功能和更快的长焦镜头。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Honor 也没有改进快速骁龙 SoC 的散热。RSR 的价格处于较高水平,这意味着如果不需要额外的功能,购买 Pro 型号可以节省约 50%的费用。

Pros

+ 明亮准确的 LTPO 显示屏
+ 出色的电池寿命
+ 快速充电
+ 多功能摄像头配置,配备强大的长焦镜头
+ 3D 人脸识别和超声波指纹传感器

Cons

- 在某些压力测试中会过热
- 增大电池容量无影响
- 无 UWB

价格和供应情况

Magic7 RSR 的建议零售价(RRP)为 1,899 欧元,可从以下网站直接购买Honor或(更便宜)Porsche Design。.配套配件可在亚马逊和其他网站上找到。

Honor Magic7 RSR 由传统的德国保时捷设计公司设计,但在技术上与 Honor Magic7 Pro.除了内存更大之外,Honor 还增加了一块更大的电池。摄像头也进行了升级。

规格

Honor Magic7 RSR (Magic7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Memory
24 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 19.7:9, 2800 x 1280 pixel 453 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, 1 - 120 LTPO, NanoCrystal Shield, 4.320 Hz PWM-Dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash, 1024 GB 
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, 3D face scan, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28 (A&B), 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28 (A&B), 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 162.7 x 77.1
Battery
5850 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode (Gen. 3), Power Enhanced Chip Honor E2
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (24 mm, f/1.4-2.0, OIS) + 200 MPix (3x optical zoom, 1/1.4", f/1.88, 72 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, 12 mm), 1200 Points LiDAR Matrix; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0, 25 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, SIM-Tool, 2 USB-Cables, Case, 2 100W-Charger, MagicOS 9.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 / IP69 | USB Copy Test: 320 MB/s (connected to Samsung 980 Pro in an Asus ROG Strix Arion Case (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: - W/kg, Head-SAR: - W/kg | max. charging speed: 100 W (wired) / 80 W (wireless) | Communication Chip Honor C2, Security Chip Honor S1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
228 g
Price
1900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

机箱和设备 - Magic7 RSR 运动型优雅机箱

Honor Magic7 RSR 有普罗旺斯和玛瑙灰两种颜色可供选择。这款智能手机经过修改的外观来自保时捷设计公司。据说它包含了这家德国公司的特色设计元素,在这种情况下,其灵感来自 Taycan Turbo S 的空气动力学美学。它还通过了 IP68 和 IP69 标准认证。

设备与 Magic7 Pro.不过,RSR 的内存是 Magic7 Pro 的两倍,电池容量更大,长焦传感器的感光度更高,自动对焦系统更好。

(图片来源:Alexander Wätzel)
(图片来源:Alexander Wätzel)
(图片来源:Alexander Wätzel)
(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)
(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)
(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)
(图片来源:丹尼尔-施密特)

尺寸比较

162.7 mm 77.1 mm 8.8 mm 228 g162.9 mm 76.5 mm 8.5 mm 213 g162.8 mm 77.6 mm 8.2 mm 218 g161.3 mm 75.3 mm 9.35 mm 229 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通讯和操作 - 智能手机,包含所有功能

Porsche Design| Honor Magic7 RSR 支持广泛的手机频段和所有现代网络标准。除两张 nano SIM 卡外,它还支持 eSIM(双 eSIM)。语音质量很好,还能有效过滤噪音。即使在极端的声学环境下,智能手机用户也能听得懂,但听起来会有些压抑。

Honor 纳米水晶屏蔽保护 Magic7 RSR 的电容式触摸屏,并具有良好的滑动特性。输入可以快速、精确地执行。显示屏中还集成了超声波指纹传感器,而 3D 人脸识别则通过 ToF 传感器实现。这两个系统都安全可靠,运行迅速。线性振动电机还能提供清晰的触觉反馈。

Networking
Honor Magic7 RSR
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
989 (min: 505) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
821 (min: 401) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1848 (min: 1807) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1567 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼97%
OnePlus 13
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
820 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
791 (min: 705) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1791 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1464 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
984 (min: 960) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
840 (min: 800) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1565 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1545) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1170 (min: 987) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1019 (min: 812) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1280 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1261 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
726 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
712 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1437 (min: 521) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1367 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼84%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Honor Magic7 RSR 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1848 (1807-1885)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1566 (1348-1604)
Honor Magic7 RSR 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1540 (785-1590)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1545-1651)
Honor Magic7 RSR 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø972 (505-1022)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø984 (960-1005)
Honor Magic7 RSR 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø806 (401-849)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø839 (800-859)

软件和可持续性 - RSR 的长期更新

在可持续发展方面,保时捷设计| Honor Magic7 RSR 的定位与其姊妹车型相似,而Honor 在这方面几乎没有提供任何信息。由于交付范围更大,外包装也更厚重。

RSR 已经从Honor 的阿尔法计划(我们的报告)中受益。我们的报告我们的报告),并可享受七年的更新服务。它配备了谷歌Android 15 和内部 MagicOS 9.0,后者还提供一些人工智能功能。

相机 - 为保时捷版配备感光度更高的长焦镜头

与 Magic7 RSR 自拍
与 Magic7 RSR 自拍

乍一看,保时捷设计| Honor Magic7 RSR 的摄像头设置与 Magic7 Pro 相似。不过,这款顶级机型采用了所谓的 LiDAR 矩阵自动对焦系统,可利用包含 1,200 个对焦点的 LiDAR 矩阵进行对焦。这意味着对焦速度更快、更精确。

200 万像素的 3 倍光学变焦也得到了升级,光圈为 f/1.88,名义上比 Magic7 Pro(光圈 f/2.6)更快。在设置相同的情况下进行直接比较,不难发现 RSR 的长焦镜头捕捉到的光线更多。

相机的其他特性与 Pro 型号完全相同。

Magic7 RSR(3 倍光学变焦、ISO 320、10 秒)Magic7 Pro(3 倍光学变焦、ISO 320、10 秒)
Magic7 RSR(3 倍光学变焦、ISO 320、10 秒)
Magic7 Pro(3 倍光学变焦、ISO 320、10 秒)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
8.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic7 RSR: 5.47 ∆E min: 1.49 - max: 8.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.7 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
22 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
18 ∆E
20 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
23 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
34 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic7 RSR: 26.18 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 38.54 ∆E

显示屏 - Magic7 RSR,亮度超过 5,000 cd/m²

子像素结构
子像素结构

保时捷设计| Honor Magic7 RSR 的 6.8 英寸 OLED 显示屏以其均衡的校准和高亮度给人留下了深刻印象。虽然在纯白色和还原白色表面上亮度几乎相同,但在播放 HDR 内容时亮度超过 5000 cd/m²。如果手动调节亮度,最高可达 781 cd/m²。

为了保护眼睛,Honor 采用了高频 PWM 调光、昼夜节律夜间显示、散焦刺激和蓝光抑制等技术,可能是智能手机中最护眼的 OLED 显示屏之一。

1540
cd/m²
1548
cd/m²
1498
cd/m²
1556
cd/m²
1571
cd/m²
1538
cd/m²
1575
cd/m²
1593
cd/m²
1614
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1614 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1559.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1571 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Honor Magic7 RSR
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"
OnePlus 13
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
-20%
-100%
-34%
Brightness middle
1571
1155
-26%
1357
-14%
1041
-34%
Brightness
1559
1155
-26%
1350
-13%
1059
-32%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
94
1%
96
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.7
1
-43%
3.1
-343%
1
-43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.9
1.8
5%
4.7
-147%
2.7
-42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
1.6
-33%
2.2
-83%
1.9
-58%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.3 96%
2 110%
2.23 99%
CCT
6514 100%
6503 100%
6391 102%
6697 97%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3438 cd/m² +132%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2613 cd/m² +76%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1481 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic7 RSR
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5097 cd/m²
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3630 cd/m² -29%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2768 cd/m² -46%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 Hz
Amplitude: 14.74 %
Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8516 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

灰度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5075 ms rise
↘ 0.5035 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.721 ms rise
↘ 0.7845 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).
保时捷设计| Honor Magic7 RSR 户外(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)
户外活动
保时捷设计| Honor Magic7 RSR 的视角
视角

性能、排放和电池寿命 - RSR 在压力测试中磕磕绊绊

骁龙 8 骁龙 8 精英版高达 24GB 的内存保证了保时捷设计| Honor Magic7 RSR 的一流性能。遗憾的是,在 3DMark 压力测试中并非总是如此。一方面,性能损失很大,另一方面,要求更高的Wild Life ExtremeSolar Bay基准测试因过热风险而中止。不过,到目前为止,我们在日常使用中还没有发现任何问题。

Honor 智能手机的扬声器音质不错,但高音有点过重。蓝牙的音频编解码器支持很稳定,但可以更广泛。

电池容量比 专业版(5,270 mAh) 和 5,850 mAh;遗憾的是,Magic7 RSR 还没有将其转换为更长的运行时间。不过,这些都非常出色。

无线充电功率高达 80 瓦;使用 Honors SuperCharger 甚至可以达到 100 瓦。后者配有两个电源装置:一个是 C 型插头,另一个是 G 型插头。充满电仅需 34 分钟(50%:14 分钟,80%:24 分钟)。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3099 Points +1%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3087 Points 0%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576 (Performance Mode)
3078 Points
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
3062 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 - 3228, n=15)
3013 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=200, last 2 years)
1541 Points -50%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points +7%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9685 Points +3%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576 (Performance Mode)
9381 Points
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
8895 Points -5%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9369 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8154 - 10401, n=15)
9267 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=200, last 2 years)
4395 Points -53%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14984 - 27169, n=13)
21807 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points +1%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
20637 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19793 Points -4%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18590 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=196, last 2 years)
13808 Points -33%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
26614 Points +7%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
25785 Points +3%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
24947 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (19436 - 25785, n=12)
23458 Points -6%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
21937 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 27327, n=189, last 2 years)
8836 Points -65%
Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
6845 Points +3%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6754 Points +2%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
6654 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (5230 - 7094, n=13)
6108 Points -8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
5809 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 7094, n=195, last 2 years)
2402 Points -64%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
6907 Points +4%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6789 Points +2%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
6638 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (5161 - 7212, n=13)
6100 Points -8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
5794 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 7212, n=194, last 2 years)
2392 Points -64%
Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
12711 Points +6%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
11974 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11879 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8652 - 13318, n=13)
10842 Points -9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10070 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2799 - 13318, n=72, last 2 years)
7877 Points -34%
Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
12395 Points +6%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11821 Points +1%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
11706 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8664 - 13244, n=13)
10702 Points -9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9972 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3223 - 13244, n=72, last 2 years)
7805 Points -33%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
120 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (60 - 166, n=13)
105.1 fps -12%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
60 fps -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.5 - 166, n=205, last 2 years)
53.5 fps -55%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
321 fps +7%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
301 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
259 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (178 - 321, n=13)
259 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
237 fps -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 321, n=205, last 2 years)
95.9 fps -68%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
118 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
100 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (53 - 144, n=13)
92.1 fps -22%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
91 fps -23%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
60 fps -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=206, last 2 years)
42 fps -64%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
115 fps +5%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
110 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
107 fps -3%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
106 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (86 - 115, n=13)
100 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 129, n=205, last 2 years)
38 fps -65%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
52 fps +2%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 (vulkan)
52 fps +2%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
51 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
49 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (38 - 52, n=13)
46.2 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 53, n=205, last 2 years)
17.8 fps -65%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288 (Chrome 132)
99202 Points +4%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576 (Chrome 134)
95506 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 (Chrome 131)
92054 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (37943 - 95506, n=13)
79526 Points -17%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 (Chrome 132)
73424 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
42229 Points -56%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
689 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
670 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (287 - 738, n=10)
538 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
522 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=37, last 2 years)
441 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=37, last 2 years)
1047 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
661 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
654 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (265 - 734, n=10)
526 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
516 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=37, last 2 years)
1743 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1430 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1375 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (594 - 1708, n=10)
1197 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1151 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
1646 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (n=1)
1646 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 1646, n=2, last 2 years)
1091 Points -34%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
695 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (n=1)
695 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (232 - 695, n=2, last 2 years)
464 Points -33%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
695 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (n=1)
695 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 - 695, n=2, last 2 years)
463 Points -33%
Max. Load
 45.7 °C46.2 °C45.2 °C 
 45.1 °C45.8 °C43.2 °C 
 44.9 °C45.4 °C43.9 °C 
Maximum: 46.2 °C
Average: 45 °C
41.5 °C42.4 °C40.2 °C
40.7 °C42.7 °C40.5 °C
41.6 °C42.9 °C40.4 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 41.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  25.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
63 % +16%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.7 % +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % +1%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.3 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65 % +44%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.7 % +13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 % +12%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 %
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Honor Magic7 RSR Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø98.1 (75.5-139.1)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø106.7 (86-136.6)
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø106.2 (104.5-116.2)
Honor Magic7 RSR Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.7 (8.42-18.7)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø14.2 (11.9-18.3)
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13 (12.7-14.1)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.243.12532.533.33121.927.94031.431.15033.540.66321.728.7802430.610017.839.812516.647.816019.756.52001953.825017.555.531516.258.440016.558.450012.367.163012.371.58001572.2100013.272.6125012.476.3160011.678.4200013.378.125001278.8315012.779.7400012.980.4500013.377.663001377800013.174.31000013.5721250013.662.51600013.455.7SPL25.489.2N0.777median 13.3median 72.2Delta1.79.638.443.230.640.119.240.421.539.636.944.224.447.719.746.315.84714.150.615.260.112.459.29.560.99.763.410.566.4970.29.873.98.976.69.479.711.579.211.278.31283.911.783.41282.31282.912.58312.981.113.38013.578.613.569.513.665.623.9930.598.2median 12median 78.31.58.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Magic7 RSRSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic7 RSR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 134)
22h 16min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Honor Magic7 RSR
5850 mAh
1336 min
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
1349 min
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
1331 min
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
5410 mAh
1270 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

与保时捷设计公司的典型产品一样,这款手机的价格相对较高。不过,Honor ,它也是一款出色的智能手机,具有较长的更新时间和独特的设计。

Honor Magic7 RSR - 04/08/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
94%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
69 / 69 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
93%
Games Performance
37 / 55 → 66%
Application Performance
85 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
45%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
87%
Average
70%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
45%
Power Use
94.8%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 50.8%

Comparison of possible alternatives

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
88.6%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
24 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.27
BMPNLSZ Black Cover for Hono...
2. $13.99
Premium 30 Pack Stylus Compa...
3. $5.71
WXPPJ [1 Pack] Screen Protec...
List Price: 1900€
228 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
2800x1280
453 PPI
OLED
2.
87.6%
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.00
WILLONE 2+2 Pcs OnePlus 13 S...
2. $12.98
JZG 3pcs for OnePlus 13 Scre...
3. $14.98
2+2 Pack For OnePlus 13 Scre...
List Price: 720€
213 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
3.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.20
Ailun Glass Screen Protector...
2. $5.94
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
3. $13.59
AACL 3-Pack for Samsung Gala...
List Price: 1449€
218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
89.5%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
Fhyeugfy for Xiaomi 15 Ultra...
2. $9.99
Anbzsign (2+2 Pack) for Xiao...
3. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 15 Ultra ...
List Price: 1499€
229 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.73"
3200x1440
521 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 采用保时捷设计和改进技术的智能手机 -Honor Magic7 RSR 评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-04-10 (Update: 2025-04-10)