联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6评论：外观犀利的14英寸笔记本电脑
IdeaPad 5 Pro可使用AMD或英特尔处理器。虽然我们在2021年测试的型号14ACN6有一个 Ryzen 5600U而目前的型号14ITL6采用了 酷睿i5-1135G74个而不是6个核心，以及16GB DDR4内存（焊接）和512GB M.2 SSD（可替换）。一个令人兴奋的特点是显示屏：在14英寸领域找到一个16:10的屏幕，并具有2,880 x 1,800这样高的分辨率是非常不寻常的。考虑到联想承诺100%的sRGB覆盖率和400 cd/m²的峰值亮度，这一点尤其令人印象深刻。我们将在后面研究这些说法。IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6的起价为800欧元（795美元）。
联想的笔记本电脑正在与其他14英寸设备竞争，这些设备的价格低于1,000欧元（1,000美元），重量不超过1.5公斤（3.3磅），比如说 HP Envy 14-eb0252ng和 华硕ZenBook 14 UM425U.这两种设备都可以在随后的对比表中找到。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
| 85.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 82.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
因为机箱与我们已经评测过的机型基本相同，所以我们不打算在这篇文章中再次讨论笔记本的机身、端口和输入设备。你可以参考我们对 IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6了解相关信息。
SD卡阅读器
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 (AV PRO V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
连接性
| Networking - iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (390 - 1734, n=76) | |
| Average of class Office (104.2 - 1775, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
网络摄像头
显示
与AMD的变体不同，本评论中基于英特尔的设备不提供2.2K触摸屏（2,240 x 1,400像素）。相反，它选择了一个没有触摸支持的更清晰的显示屏，它是相当无光泽的，因此反射率明显较低。2,880 x 1,800的分辨率对于一台14英寸的笔记本电脑来说是非常高的；有些人甚至可能说它太高了。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 403 cd/m²
Contrast: 1343:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.77
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.199
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 LEN140WUXGA+, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng BOE0929, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U CMN N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -4% | -10% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 74 | 72.2 -2% | 69.3 -6% | 63.8 -14% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.5 0% | 98.5 -1% | 96.1 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 75 | 74.3 -1% | 70.4 -6% | 65.9 -12% |
| Response Times | -112% | -49% | -15% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29.4 ? | 45.2 ? -54% | 44.9 ? -53% | 32.9 ? -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 13.1 ? | 35.2 ? -169% | 18.9 ? -44% | 15.4 ? -18% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -4% | 10% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 403 | 310.6 -23% | 451 12% | 466 16% |
| Brightness | 372 | 302 -19% | 439 18% | 434 17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 92 10% | 92 10% | 86 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.22 27% | 0.31 -3% | 0.39 -30% |
| Contrast | 1343 | 1412 5% | 1455 8% | 1195 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.74 | 2.67 3% | 2.46 10% | 2.76 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.49 | 4.54 -1% | 4.24 6% | 7.97 -78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.77 | 2.33 -32% | 1.32 25% | 0.56 68% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 3.7 -3% | 3.5 3% | 4.7 -31% |
| Gamma | 2.199 100% | 2.12 104% | 2.24 98% | 2.128 103% |
| CCT | 6547 99% | 6398 102% | 7289 89% | 7284 89% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -39% /
-19% | -14% /
-2% | -10% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
撇开像素密度不谈，我们对16:10的屏幕所测得的数值印象深刻。虽然屏幕没有达到规定的400cd/m²的最大亮度，但IdeaPad 5 Pro仍然以372cd/m²的平均峰值亮度领先于大多数14英寸的笔记本电脑，并明显胜过其触摸功能的对应产品（只有302cd/m²）。非触摸版本在响应时间方面也明显更好（13至29毫秒，而不是35至45毫秒）。
同时，对比度的差异也在合理范围内。由于显示器的黑色水平较高（0.3比0.22cd/m²），英特尔版本在某种程度上落后于AMD版本。也就是说，1,343:1的对比度对于IPS显示屏来说仍然是一个值得尊敬的数字。我们特别想赞扬一下高色彩准确性：开箱后，显示器的色彩再现已经在理想范围内。我们也很难在其色彩覆盖率上找到任何问题。在99%的sRGB、75%的AdobeRGB和74%的P3中，该屏幕应该能够满足大多数用户的需求。
正如IPS面板所预期的那样，该显示屏具有良好的可视角度。由于最大亮度相对较高，在户外使用笔记本电脑是可行的，只要阳光不是太强烈或直接照在屏幕上。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 29.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
业绩
IdeaPad 5 Pro拥有16GB内存、NVMe SSD和四核处理器，在全能型笔记本电脑中处于中下水平。它在3D应用方面特别挣扎，因为它缺乏一个专用的显卡，集成的Iris Xe Graphics G7（80 EUs）很快就会耗尽能量。
测试条件
预装的联想Vantage软件让用户能够以多种方式调整和改变系统。在 "电源和性能 "菜单项下（见截图），用户能够从三个配置文件中进行选择。我们的测试是在 "智能冷却 "模式下进行的，该模式默认是激活的。那些想要更多动力的人可以启用 "性能 "模式，而 "电池保护 "模式是为那些希望他们的设备更安静和在路上持续更长时间的用户准备的。
处理器
酷睿i5-1135G7是英特尔Tiger Lake 系列中一个非常受欢迎的四核型号。它特别适合于轻薄型笔记本电脑，并且可以使用超线程技术并行运行多达八个线程。然而，这款英特尔芯片在与AMD Ryzen 5600U的竞争中挣扎得很厉害。根据我们的性能评级，Ryzen 5总体上要快30%左右--考虑到i5-1135G7要用较少的内核，这并不令人惊讶。我们使用Cinebench R15来评估系统在较长负荷下的表现，除了性能上的一些相当小的波动外，没有观察到任何异常情况。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 -2! | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (4313 - 7952, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (19402 - 32283, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1316 - 2172, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (39000 - 46951, n=45) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3497 - 4445, n=45) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (12569 - 19635, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (28988 - 67977, n=45) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Average of class Office (7860 - 155900, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (265 - 373, n=51) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (2226 - 4291, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (9004 - 45366, n=45) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
系统性能
同样，系统性能也证明是相当不理想的。这台笔记本电脑在PCMark 10中得了4705分，因此在我们的比较中处于中等水平。根据我们的主观印象，IdeaPad 5 Pro的反应和速度与你所期望的新设备一样快。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4026 - 4952, n=53) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8149 - 9917, n=53) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5040 - 6619, n=53) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Office (2126 - 9773, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (3548 - 5255, n=53) | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4705 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (17443 - 63889, n=45) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (19716 - 63705, n=45) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (18722 - 66778, n=45) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (68.3 - 107, n=51) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6在我们的延迟测试中表现并不理想。LatencyMon表明，该笔记本电脑在实时处理音频和视频内容方面有问题。然而，这个缺陷是影响许多其他笔记本电脑的东西。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
联想在该设备中放入了一块512GB的西部数据SN730。尽管这种固态硬盘很容易与SK海力士和东芝硬盘保持同步，但在运行我们的Diskpd连续测试一段时间后，它的性能开始出现相当大的波动。这种情况在理想情况下不应该发生。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
虽然Iris Xe Graphics G7的96 EUs版本（在一些较高端的 机型上发现）可能足以满足休闲游戏者的需求。(在一些更高端的Tiger Lake 型号上发现)可能对休闲游戏者来说足够好，但80-EU的变体Core i5-1135G7上的80-EU变体并不完全带来出色的性能。在我们一系列的GPU测试中，AMD的RX Vega 7和RX Vega 8都带来了略微更多的性能。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5194 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 59420 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14436 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2927 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1258 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
在我们的游戏测试中，乏善可陈的图形性能变得特别明显。较老的游戏可以玩，但它们中的大多数不能在其原始分辨率（最多全高清）或（非常）高的设置下运行。目前的游戏往往不能以流畅的帧率运行（例如 小小蒂娜的仙境》（Tiny Tina's Wonderlands& 采石场），无论选择什么样的分辨率和细节水平。但话说回来，IdeaPad 5 Pro也不是被设计成一个游戏设备。
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Office (16 - 177, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (30.2 - 97.4, n=101) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (21.8 - 56.9, n=103) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 59.1, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9.3 - 33.5, n=101) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
正如预期的那样，在60分钟的测试中，没有出现任何性能下降或类似的情况。的方式进行。Witcher 3.
Witcher 3 FPS graph
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 64.4 | 52.2 | 15.2 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 58.3 | 37.6 | 17.6 | 10.4 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.5 | 63.1 | 42.2 | 38.3 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 27.9 | 14.4 | 9.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36.9 | 30.4 | 27.3 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 60.8 | 24 | 20.3 | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 19.8 | 16.1 | 10.5 | |
| Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) | 39.4 | 24.4 | 23 | |
| The Quarry (2022) | 11.9 | 8.9 | 7.1 |
排放
噪声排放
我们对这款14英寸笔记本电脑的一个主要抱怨是其风扇控制。即使在 "电池保护 "模式下，当设备处于闲置状态或处理简单任务时，如办公应用、视频播放和网络浏览，风扇仍然频繁启动。一些用户可能会觉得这很烦人，尤其是风扇不时地不必要地转动起来。当在负载下运行时，该设备通常是相当可听的，产生的噪音水平为38至42 dB(A)。这些数字比我们在采用这种处理器的笔记本上看到的要略高一些。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 27 / 29 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39 / 42 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 4% | -8% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 24.6 2% | 26 -4% | 26 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 24.6 2% | 26 -4% | 26 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 27 | 24.6 9% | 27 -0% | 27 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 25.1 13% | 31 -7% | 32 -10% |
| Load Average * | 39 | 29.6 24% | 32 18% | 45 -15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38 | 31.9 16% | 33 13% | 43 -13% |
| Load Maximum * | 42 | 45.5 -8% | 36 14% | 47 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑的发热情况没有什么可抱怨的。在用FurMark和Prime95进行了一个小时的压力测试后，机箱的顶部表面升温到42℃（108℉），底部表面升温到45℃（113℉）。我们认为这些数值是可以接受的。在空闲状态下，机箱的大部分温度保持在30°C（86°F）以上。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-7.4 °C / -13.3 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 15% | 5% | -1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 35.8 15% | 41 2% | 46 -10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 42.8 5% | 43 4% | 49 -9% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 25 26% | 29 15% | 30 12% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 26.2 13% | 30 -0% | 29 3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
压力测试显示，这些组件仍有一些空间。即使长时间满负荷运行，CPU也从未超过80°C（176°F），平均温度为65°C（176°F），这是一个不错的结果。
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
消耗功率
尽管有非常高分辨率的显示屏，IdeaPad 5 Pro仍然是相当省电的。这款笔记本电脑在空闲时消耗约7瓦，这与配备Core i5-1135G7和Iris Xe Graphics G7的设备的平均耗电量一致，有80个EU。在负载情况下，这台14英寸的笔记本电脑可以消耗高达68瓦的功率，这同样还是一个合理的数字（附带的充电器额定功率为65瓦）。
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / Watt |
| Idle | 5 / 7 / 13 Watt |
| Load |
41 / 68 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8 | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | 12% | 0% | 11% | 8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 3.8 24% | 4 20% | 6 -20% | 4.48 ? 10% | 4.5 ? 10% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 6.9 1% | 5 29% | 8 -14% | 7.37 ? -5% | 7.46 ? -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13 | 8.8 32% | 9 31% | 10 23% | 9.24 ? 29% | 9.09 ? 30% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 42.2 -3% | 35 15% | 41 -0% | 36.4 ? 11% | 42.8 ? -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.1 | 37.7 6% | 38.7 3% | 43.6 -9% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 68 | 68.4 -1% | 87 -28% | 53 22% | 61.7 ? 9% | 61.8 ? 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
IdeaPad 5 Pro在电池寿命方面看起来不是很好。通过Wi-Fi浏览网页的电池寿命约为7.5小时（屏幕亮度为150cd/m²），这当然不是一个坏结果，但惠普Envy 14和华硕ZenBook 14能够持续更长时间。这部分是由于它们的电池较大：这两款笔记本电脑的电池容量分别为63.3Wh和67Wh。联想应该在这一领域做出改进。
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 56.5 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7, 57 Wh | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63.3 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM425U R7 5700U, Vega 8, 67 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 24% | 79% | 98% | 38% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 442 | 550 24% | 792 79% | 876 98% | 612 ? 38% |
| Reader / Idle | 1298 | 1300 ? | |||
| Load | 60 | 117.8 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决书
IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6是一个伟大的设备，如果你能忽略适度的网络摄像头，相对脆弱的触摸板和次优的风扇行为（风扇在很多时候是可以听到的）。
具有2,880 x 1,800高分辨率的16:10显示屏是这款笔记本电脑的主要独特卖点。
由于其紧凑的尺寸和相当轻的设计，这款14英寸的设备也非常便携，几乎可以作为随身携带的完美伴侣。
尽管如此，现在有一大批竞争对手，它们的价格低于1,000欧元（993美元），并提供类似甚至更好的性能。这款 HP Envy 14-eb0252ng我们最近评测的惠普Envy 14-eb0252ng也有一个 酷睿i5-1135G7并提供，例如，更长的电池寿命，更愉快的风扇控制和更生动的显示屏。
那些喜欢他们的笔记本电脑特别薄和轻的人应该仔细看看 华硕ZenBook 14.所有这三款笔记本都是为寻找全能设备的用户设计的--除了3D性能--外形小巧。
价格和可用性
IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6配备Core i5-1135G7，16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘，起价为799欧元（799美元），可从一些网上商店购买。然而，它还没有在北美上市。
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6
- 08/28/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
