Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

酷睿至尊 7 268V是发布时(2024 年 9 月 3 日)速度第二快的 Lunar Lake 系列处理器。这是一款用于平板电脑和轻薄型笔记本电脑的 SoC,配备了 4 个全新的 E 核和 4 个略带新意的 P 核,主频高达 5.0 GHz,同时还配备了极具潜力的全新的 Arc 140ViGPU 和 32 GB 内置 LPDDR5x-8533 内存。此外,还包括一个新的 48 TOPS 神经引擎、TB 4 和 PCIe 5 SSD 支持。

速度略快的 酷睿至尊 9 288V的 iGPU 和 P 核时钟速度略高,但功耗也略高。

架构和特性

Lunar Lake 采用了 Foveros 技术(将多个芯片堆叠在一起,彼此相邻),就像 Meteor Lake 一样。据报道,新芯片使用了巨大的 BGA2833 插座接口;Lion Cove P 核心取代了 Redwood 核心,而 Crestwood E 核心则被 Skymont 所取代,据说后者的能效非常高,使得 Meteor Lake 多出的 2 个低功耗岛 CPU 核心完全多余。在这 8 个内核中,没有一个支持超线程技术。

英特尔声称,Lion Cove 的 IPC 性能提高了 14%。而 Skymont 则提高了 68%。此外,还有其他方面的改进,例如低延迟架构(Low Latency Fabric),据说它能使内核/缓存之间的小数据传输更快。在其他方面,268V 有 4 条 PCIe 5 和 5 条 PCIe 4 通道,可连接各种设备,包括 NVMe SSD,速度高达 15.75 GB/s。默认板载支持 TB 4,支持英特尔的 CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 卡。48 TOPS NPU 4 神经引擎的出现,使 Windows Defender 等支持人工智能的应用更加强大。

268V 配备了 32 GB 的封装内不可更换 LPDDR5X-8533 内存。

性能

268V 不太可能创造新的性能记录。我们预计它的多核性能将与 酷睿 i7-1260P酷睿 5 120U.一个令人好奇的 Geekbench 泄露为酷睿 Ultra 7 芯片描绘了一幅更好的图景,但这些分数是通过测试迷你 PC 而不是笔记本电脑获得的。迷你 PC 的 TDP 功耗目标可能比英特尔建议的要高得多。

图形

显卡 Arc Graphics 140V拥有 8 个 Xe² 架构内核,运行频率高达 2,000 MHz,并有 8 个光线追踪单元可供选择。它支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate,能够对 h.266 VVC、h.265 HEVC、h.264 AVC、AV1 和 VP9 等众多流行视频编解码器进行硬件解码。该 iGPU 可同时使用至少三台(最有可能是四台)SUHD 4320p 显示器。

其性能比 Radeon 780M弧 8性能。

功耗

大多数 Lunar Lake 处理器的长期功耗目标应该是 17 W。与此同时,英特尔建议该芯片的短期 PL 值为 37 W。

CodenameLunar Lake
SeriesIntel Lunar Lake

Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V « 2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock Rate2200 - 5000 MHz
Level 1 Cache1.4 MB
Level 2 Cache14 MB
Level 3 Cache12 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 5.0 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)17 Watt
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketBGA2833
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (48 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
GPUIntel Arc Graphics 140V ( - 2000 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date09/03/2024
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
39.3 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
123.3 Points (69%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
600 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9835     avg: 10185     median: 10185 (9%)     max: 10535 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1910     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (83%)     max: 1985 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 736     avg: 750     median: 750 (83%)     max: 764 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3811     avg: 3970     median: 3970 (10%)     max: 4129 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1601     avg: 1609     median: 1608.5 (10%)     max: 1616 Points
AMD A4-1200
31 -98%
...
1554 -3%
1559 -3%
1562 -3%
1583 -2%
1590 -1%
1594 -1%
1598 -1%
1599 -1%
1607 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
1609
1614 0%
1625 1%
1628 1%
1634 2%
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1656 3%
1656 3%
1658 3%
1659 3%
1663 3%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
6089 278%
max:
15842 885%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 287     avg: 294.5     median: 294.5 (83%)     max: 302 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 32797     avg: 34242     median: 34242 (20%)     max: 35687 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5884     avg: 5953     median: 5952.5 (70%)     max: 6021 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.4     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (20%)     max: 12.9 fps
012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 555     avg: 627     median: 626.5 (8%)     max: 698 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 337     avg: 373.5     median: 373.5 (3%)     max: 410 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4344     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4565 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12177     avg: 13826     median: 13826 (34%)     max: 15475 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
10990 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16799     avg: 19443     median: 19443 (35%)     max: 22087 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5865     avg: 6825     median: 6824.5 (29%)     max: 7784 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2583     avg: 2754     median: 2809 (70%)     max: 2871 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10589     avg: 10926     median: 10911 (42%)     max: 11279 points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2008     avg: 2036     median: 2008 (78%)     max: 2091 points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9491     avg: 9686     median: 9766 (17%)     max: 9801 points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 475     avg: 475.5     median: 475.5 (1%)     max: 476 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
114924 Points (88%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 245     avg: 266     median: 266 (73%)     max: 287 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 266     avg: 288     median: 288 (52%)     max: 310 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1643     avg: 1691     median: 1690.5 (63%)     max: 1738 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41     avg: 45.7     median: 45.7 (8%)     max: 50.4 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 51.2     avg: 54     median: 54 (10%)     max: 56.8 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.2     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (2%)     max: 3.7 Watt
00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.92.12.32.62.833.23.53.73.94.24.4Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.2     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (5%)     max: 5.18 Watt
0123456Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 28.5     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (22%)     max: 31.3 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.29
log 14. 09:30:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Apr 2025 05:28:56 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.015s ... 0.016s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#12 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.017s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 17991 +0.013s ... 0.03s

#15 got single benchmarks 17991 +0.01s ... 0.04s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.467s ... 0.507s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.507s

#19 return log +0s ... 0.507s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Lunar Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 238V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 236V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
   8x 3.2 GHz - 4.7 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
   8x 3.2 GHz - 4.7 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 7435H
   8x 3.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
   8x 3.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
   8x 3 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
   12x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
   12x 3.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
   6x 2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
   6x 2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-10-13)