Notebookcheck Logo

微星Katana GF66 11UG评论。浪费了潜力的游戏笔记本

性能有限。

尽管配备了顶级的硬件,这就是微星Katana GF66所提供的。在我们的测试中,经过几个基准测试,问题出现了,微星是否在错误的地方偷工减料。NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070和英特尔酷睿i7-11800H无法发挥其全部性能潜力。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook MSI Tiger Lake

微星Katana GF66 11UG-220是微星公司在2021年5月才推出的配备英特尔第11代处理器和RTX 3000系列显卡的整个系列新游戏笔记本电脑之一。这款简单而优雅的笔记本电脑的外观是由插画师长野刚设计的,这位艺术家在日本也因其《星球大战》封面而闻名。

根据微星公司的说法,Katana笔记本电脑是以创造著名日本剑所需的高超工艺创造的。至少,测试配置中的英特尔酷睿i7-11800H,16GB内存,NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070,以及512GB NVMe固态硬盘,有望实现高性能。作为操作系统,只预装了FreeOS。对于我们的测试,我们在系统上安装了Windows 10 Home。这项测试的竞争对手包括 华硕TUF Dash F15,以及联想Legion 5 Pro 16,以及Gigabyte Aero 15 OLEDRazer Blade 15,以及 申克XMG Neo 15.

MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 (Katana GF66 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 200 W PL2 / Short Burst, 200 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H, CPU thermal design 45W, unlocked in firmware
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1290 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 85 W TDP, GDDR6, 471.41, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1, 512 GB 
, 510 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port
Networking
Realtek RTL8168B/8111B (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 359 x 259
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
FreeDos
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2, Keyboard: island style, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.253 kg, Power Supply: 422 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
79.2 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.4 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg26.85 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.6 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg20 mm15.60"3840x2160
82.4 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2021
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2 kg20 mm15.60"1920x1080
88.9 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
87 %
v7 (old)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg26 mm15.60"2560x1440

外壳 - 游戏笔记本电脑的外壳简单而优雅

在游戏笔记本中,微星Katana GF66的外壳因其不显眼而特别突出。笔记本电脑的外壳完全由黑色塑料制成。在设计方面,微星也只使用了很少的点缀。然而,这几个元素确保了独特的设计。侧面的拉丝表面,显示屏上方的小角度,盖子上的龙形标志,以及有角度的铰链,当你再看这台游戏笔记本时,会有一种咄咄逼人的外观。

在做工方面,微星笔记本电脑只显示了一个弱点。虽然所有的缝隙都很紧密,机箱的稳定性也相当高,但显示屏的铰链往往有点太容易晃动了。显示屏也可以用一只手打开到180°角,在只有一些轻微振动的情况下,显示屏甚至会降得更低。

就其尺寸和重量而言,15至16英寸的游戏笔记本电脑是相似的。至少2公斤(约4.4磅)加上电源,是一个需要拖动的重量。

Size Comparison

359.8 mm 243 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 259 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 264.4 mm 26.85 mm 2.6 kg360 mm 252 mm 20 mm 2 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 没有Thunderbolt或DisplayPort,连接就不再是最新的了

KatanaGF66只有3个USB Type-A端口和一个USB Type-C端口,其连接方式相当有限,尤其是USB-C连接不提供任何Thunderbolt或PowerDelivery功能。这意味着,右侧的HDMI连接是连接外部显示器的唯一选择。在微星游戏笔记本中,你还必须做的是没有SD卡插槽。

此外,一些连接的位置也是令人遗憾的。由于有角度的电源插头,可能会发生暖风直接吹到电缆上的情况,而所有的USB连接都在机箱的中心。

3.5-毫米音频端口,USB-A 3.2(5 Gbit/s),USB-C 3.2(5 Gbit/s),HDMI 2.0(4K UHD高达60 Hz),RJ-45(LAN)。
3.5-毫米音频端口,USB-A 3.2(5 Gbit/s),USB-C 3.2(5 Gbit/s),HDMI 2.0(4K UHD高达60 Hz),RJ-45(LAN)。
电源连接,USB-A 3.2(5 Gbit/s),USB-A 2.0
电源连接,USB-A 3.2(5 Gbit/s),USB-A 2.0

沟通

微星Katana GF66一个英特尔AX201适配器正在处理WLAN轴和蓝牙5.2。在天线的选择和位置方面,微星做得很好,所以使用WLAN卡的传输速率高于平均水平。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1517 (1451min - 1574max) MBit/s +8%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1409 (1308min - 1550max) MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1239 (1161min - 1273max) MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -18%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1076 (944min - 1117max) MBit/s -24%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
973 MBit/s -31%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
967 (471min - 1048max) MBit/s -31%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1743 (864min - 1763max) MBit/s +28%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1386 (1274min - 1446max) MBit/s +2%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1358 (1242min - 1548max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1330 MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1151 (577min - 1211max) MBit/s -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
928 (868min - 988max) MBit/s -32%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500Tooltip
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1358 (1242-1548)
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1409 (1308-1550)

网络摄像头

720p的网络摄像头显示了当前笔记本电脑典型的糟糕图像质量。模糊的对比度和高色彩偏差也是这个镜头的特点。

ColorChecker
16.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
16 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220: 14.01 ∆E min: 4.81 - max: 23.15 ∆E

安全问题

目前的英特尔处理器,如我们测试单元中的处理器,支持Windows 11的必要安全功能,如TPM 2.0和SecureBoot。微星没有在游戏笔记本中整合任何额外的安全功能。

辅料

笔记本电脑的盒子里只包括180瓦的电源和一小批写有一些重要信息的文件。

维护

原则上,微星Katana GF66可以相当容易地打开。有12颗PH1螺丝将底盖固定在底座上。卸下这些螺丝后,你可以用一个塑料撬具绕过盖子周围的缝隙,进入内部。然而,我们的测试装置借出的提供者要求我们不要破坏制造商的密封。但是,通过大的风扇通风口偷看,我们还是可以做出一些猜测。

工作内存和固态硬盘以及WLAN模块可以被替换,而且设备中还有一个额外存储模块的连接。大风扇应该也很容易清洗。

担保

微星为GF66提供了24个月的制造商保修。有缺陷的设备会在一个中心地点被取走和修理,然后也会从那里寄回给客户。

输入设备 - 一个红色的完整键盘

键盘

键盘采用红色照明,提供了一个完整的布局,包括一个数字块,尽管这个数字块原来略小。使用大键的打字体验感觉很舒服。对于一个笔记本键盘来说,按键提供了令人惊讶的高打字阻力,压力点明确。即使这个键盘也可以用一些强大的压力压下去,然而你必须使用相当大的力量才能做到这一点。这款键盘的一个小瑕疵是,光滑的表面会立即出现指纹。

红色背景照明可以分三步调整。无论调整到什么程度,红光都不会在眼睛里产生任何眩光。

不幸的是,在我们测试的时候,我们无法找到能够启用所有按键的功能键的驱动程序。与F5、F6和F7键的三个组合键没有提供任何功能。

触摸板

触摸板的尺寸为6.5厘米×10.5厘米(约2.6×4.1英寸),变成了相当小。另一方面,它的反应非常灵敏,在输入时没有显示任何弱点。

显示 - 144赫兹并不能确保良好的显示效果

具有全高清分辨率的哑光144-Hz显示面板显示出相当好的响应时间。而在321cd/m²的情况下,显示屏也相当明亮。然而,在一些图像区域会形成较大的光晕,在一些黑暗的图像序列中也能明显感觉到。在我们的测试装置中,这些亮点集中在显示屏的右侧。

在使用的显示技术方面,微星指定为 "宽视角(IPS级)"。

子像素网格
子像素网格
屏幕出血
屏幕出血
323
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 345 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 321.3 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 307 cd/m²
Contrast: 1137:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.41
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.276
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Samsung SDC4143, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
LQ156M1JW26 (SHP1532), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Display
9%
37%
4%
4%
6%
Display P3 Coverage
65.4
99.9
53%
66.9
2%
66.9
2%
68.6
5%
sRGB Coverage
91.3
99
8%
100
10%
98.1
7%
97.1
6%
98.6
8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.7
73
9%
99.5
49%
67.9
2%
69
3%
69.3
4%
Response Times
17%
72%
-26%
27%
-62%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
9.2 ?(3, 6.2)
-24%
2.8 ?(1.6, 1.2)
62%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-62%
4.2 ?(2.6, 1.6)
43%
16 ?(8.4, 7.6)
-116%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
4.8
57%
2 ?(1, 1)
82%
10 ?(5.6, 4.4)
11%
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
11%
12 ?(6, 6)
-7%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(83)
23580 ?(30)
Screen
28%
128%
17%
19%
4%
Brightness middle
307
551
79%
440
43%
286
-7%
353.4
15%
324
6%
Brightness
321
523
63%
446
39%
275
-14%
340
6%
307
-4%
Brightness Distribution
83
88
6%
92
11%
91
10%
92
11%
91
10%
Black Level *
0.27
0.54
-100%
0.04
85%
0.25
7%
0.31
-15%
0.27
-0%
Contrast
1137
1020
-10%
11000
867%
1144
1%
1140
0%
1200
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.67
1.8
61%
2.53
46%
2.43
48%
2.17
54%
3.36
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.53
2.53
66%
7.82
-4%
6.33
16%
5.69
24%
9.87
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.41
1.66
31%
2.57
-7%
0.83
66%
1.05
56%
1.23
49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.5
1.85
59%
1.2
73%
3.5
22%
3.4
24%
5.8
-29%
Gamma
2.276 97%
2.3 96%
2.206 100%
2.32 95%
2.2 100%
2.311 95%
CCT
6824 95%
6338 103%
6371 102%
7145 91%
6830 95%
7087 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
72.81
68
69
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.41
91
93
Total Average (Program / Settings)
18% / 23%
79% / 101%
-2% / 8%
17% / 17%
-17% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

微星笔记本电脑的对比度相当高,但在某些场景中一些光晕是很明显的。只有将显示器的亮度降低20%左右,这些较亮的区域在黑暗的序列中就不会再那么明显了。然后,显示器就能以饱和的黑色来说服人。虽然91.3%的sRGB色彩空间覆盖率并不差,但考虑到这是一台游戏笔记本电脑,它可以更多一点。你还应该在Windows下使用颜色配置文件。通过使用我们的ICC文件,显示器的平均色彩偏差可以大大减少,你可以从信息框中的链接下载。一旦经过校准,该显示器就能产生相当好的图像。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:饱和度
卡尔曼:饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
微星Katana GF66与sRGB对比
微星Katana GF66与sRGB对比
微星Katana GF66 VS AdobeRGB
微星Katana GF66 VS AdobeRGB

户外使用

KatanaGF66的哑光显示屏在户外也能轻松阅读。表面上几乎没有任何反射。明亮的显示屏只有在阳光直射下才会被淹没。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

从所有视角看,显示屏的色彩再现都很稳定,唯一明显的差异是在亮度上。

性能--英特尔与AMD相差无几

微星公司为KatanaGF66提供了大量的配置选项。我们的测试装置配备了英特尔酷睿i7-11800H处理器,NVIDIA®GeForce RTX 3070笔记本GPU,16GB DDR4-3200内存,以及512GB NVMe SSD。此外,我们的笔记本电脑还提供了扩展存储的选项。制造商的网站还显示了许多其他配置,包括RTX 3050、3060和3070显卡,以及i5和i7处理器和8或16GB的工作内存。配置选项还包括一个可用的M.2插槽。此外,这款游戏笔记本电脑可以选择是否配备微软Windows 10系统。

CPU-Z。CPU
CPU-Z:缓存
CPU-Z。主板
CPU-Z。内存
CPU-Z。内存插槽1
CPU-Z。内存插槽2
CPU-Z。英特尔UHD Graphics
CPU-Z。NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070
CPU-Z。标杆平衡模式
CPU-Z。基准性能模式
HWiNFO。英特尔图形
GPU-Z。NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070
GPU-Z。英特尔UHD Graphics
GPU-Z。高级信息

处理器

英特尔酷睿i7-11800H是一款功能强大的SoC处理器,适用于功耗高的设备,基于Tiger Lake 架构。在GF66中,该处理器的时钟速度短暂地达到了4.6GHz。TDP是解锁的,因此,英特尔酷睿i7只受到当前温度的限制。然而,从长远来看,可用的散热选项限制了笔记本电脑的性能,即使通过[FN]+[↑]组合键 将风扇调整为以最高速度持续运行。风扇不会自己以全速运行。在30分钟的Cinebench循环中,单次运行的耗电量在74瓦左右。我们在这里也可以看到一个相当大的差异,如果我们不把风扇固定在全速上,因为平均分就会从1900降到1316。英特尔第11代笔记本处理器可以明显接近目前AMD笔记本处理器的性能。在 Legion Cinebench R15的多核模式 ,英特尔酷睿i7-11800H至少在几次运行中能够击败联想Ryzen 7 5800H

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H; fan in full speed: Ø1900 (1799.78-2120.55)
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Intel Core i7-11800H; Factory settings: Ø1316 (1300.31-1341.52)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2089 (2082.79-2095.01)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø1042 (1014.95-1086.9)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1867 (1776.59-1876.96)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2153 (2123.03-2172.97)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1746 (1719.69-1885.99)
Cinebench R23
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
1520 Points 0%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
1517 Points
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1513 Points 0%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
1507 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1522, n=45)
1497 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1399 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1374 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1294 Points -15%
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21994 Points +160%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
14088 Points +67%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12817 Points +52%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11938 Points +41%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12197 (11396.1min - 12197.5max) Points +44%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6508 - 14088, n=48)
11650 Points +38%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
11102 Points +31%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
8447 Points
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
5786 Points -32%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points +25%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
583 Points
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=47)
576 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
529 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
502 Points -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
520 Points -11%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
519 Points -11%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8352 Points +153%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
5408 Points +64%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4982 Points +51%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4611 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4706 Points +42%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2498 - 5408, n=50)
4459 Points +35%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
4128 Points +25%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
3306 Points
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
2199 Points -33%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +21%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
231 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
230 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
209 Points -9%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (201 - 231, n=46)
225 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
204 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3440 Points +62%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
2173 (2123.03min - 2172.97max) Points +2%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
2121 (1799.78min - 2120.55max) Points
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
1342 (1300.31min - 1341.52max) Points -37%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2095 (2082.79min - 2095.01max) Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=50)
1894 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1886 (1719.69min - 1885.99max) Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1877 (1776.59min - 1876.96max) Points -12%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
1086 (631.76min - 1047.34max) Points -49%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
467 Seconds * -37%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
342 Seconds *
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
313 Seconds * +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 454, n=46)
277 Seconds * +19%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
259 Seconds * +24%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
255 Seconds * +25%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
244 Seconds * +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
217 Seconds * +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.4 Seconds * +50%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6322 MIPS +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
5716 MIPS +3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
5567 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5497 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5038 MIPS -10%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5732, n=46)
5492 MIPS -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5480 MIPS -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
5392 MIPS -3%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
5128 MIPS -8%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85738 MIPS +125%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
56758 MIPS +49%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56682 MIPS +49%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56187 MIPS +47%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
53597 MIPS +40%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (33718 - 56758, n=46)
48384 MIPS +27%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
44739 MIPS +17%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
38156 MIPS
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
26791 MIPS -30%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
1625 Points +3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
1585 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1429 - 1625, n=40)
1561 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1516 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1393 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1347 Points -15%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
1376 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15098 Points +123%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
9851 Points +46%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
8864 Points +31%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4655 - 9851, n=40)
8551 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8244 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7993 Points +18%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
6758 Points
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
4733 Points -30%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +115%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
17.4 fps +58%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
16.1 fps +46%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps +34%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
15 fps +36%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)
13.8 fps +25%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
11.9 fps +8%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
11 fps
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.16 fps -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
99.9 s * -102%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.9 s * -15%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
56.5 s * -14%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
49.5 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.1 s * +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.8 s * +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)
46.5 s * +6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
45.9 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.587 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)
0.566 sec * -3%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.562 sec * -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.559 sec * -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.55 sec * -0%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.548 sec *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4366 sec * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
229 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
195 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1342 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3306 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
583 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8447 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1517 Points
Help

系统性能

系统性能处于一个良好的水平。这款笔记本电脑为办公任务、冲浪、游戏以及图像和视频处理提供了足够的可用资源。然而,在PCMark 10中得到6666分,微星笔记本电脑的表现没有达到其他游戏笔记本电脑的高水平。这方面的原因之一可以追溯到电源。只有180瓦,电源的尺寸非常小。 根据HWinfo的数据,CPU在测试中使用了超过74瓦的功率。由于Nvidia芯片也需要高达100瓦的功率,如果所有组件都要发挥其最高水平,那么所提供的功率对整个系统来说是不够的。此外,笔记本电脑的系统性能取决于在UEFI中调整的值和风扇模式。在运行以下基准测试之前,我们进行了几次优化系统性能的尝试。然而,事实上,微星没有提供任何Windows软件来做这件事(至少在他们的德国主页上进行测试的时候),这个过程相当麻烦,需要多次重启和测试运行。

在主电源操作中,这台笔记本电脑主观上表现出很高的水平。所有的应用程序都能快速启动,笔记本电脑对输入的反应也很迅速。另一方面,微星GF66在电池运行时显得有些迟钝。使用PCMark 10的基准测试证实了这一点。与电源操作相比,超过2000分的差异在部分地区是明显的。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7813 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7356 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7190 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7062 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (6126 - 7311, n=11)
6912 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6717 Points +1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
6666 Points
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6088 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11064 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10836 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10271 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (9248 - 10832, n=11)
10104 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10028 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9548 Points +3%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9378 Points +1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
9248 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9909 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9669 Points +5%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9298 Points +1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
9217 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (8571 - 9669, n=11)
9051 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9015 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8983 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8866 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12168 Points +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10932 Points +16%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10831 Points +15%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9858 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7627 - 10851, n=11)
9833 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9715 Points +3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
9431 Points
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
7023 Points -26%
PCMark 10 Score
6666 points
Help

DPC延迟

DPC延迟为952微秒,微星游戏笔记本属于测试设备的平均水平。这是微软的内核模式驱动程序(WDF01000.sys)导致问题的另一个例子。根据升级的情况,这里可能会有一些改进。GF66掌握了我们的4k 60-Hz YouTube测试视频的重现,零掉帧。

LatencyMon的结果
LatencyMon的结果
LatencyMon驱动程序
LatencyMon驱动程序
YouTube 4h60测试视频再现
YouTube 4h60测试视频再现
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4392 μs * -361%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1154 μs * -21%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1122 μs * -18%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
953 μs *
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
823 μs * +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
533 μs * +44%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

金士顿的512GB固态硬盘在CrystalDiskMark和AS SSD的基准测试中提供了可接受的数值。预装的存储空间很难满足大量游戏库的需要。然而,GF66的存储空间是可以扩展的。

MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
109%
348%
92%
338%
271%
Write 4K
138.2
89.9
-35%
231.4
67%
129.6
-6%
295.6
114%
162.7
18%
Read 4K
31.31
30.98
-1%
89.5
186%
44.71
43%
85.7
174%
79
152%
Write Seq
459.3
4208
816%
1929
320%
4149
803%
2865
524%
Read Seq
1283
4512
252%
2035
59%
4203
228%
3411
166%
Write 4K Q32T1
321
371.6
16%
648
102%
425.9
33%
715
123%
522
63%
Read 4K Q32T1
394.5
470.6
19%
691
75%
433.4
10%
709
80%
508
29%
Write Seq Q32T1
436
3065
603%
5111
1072%
1390
219%
4681
974%
4765
993%
Read Seq Q32T1
2222
3370
52%
7002
215%
3505
58%
6905
211%
7083
219%
AS SSD
173%
542%
220%
523%
437%
Seq Read
1978
2695
36%
5357
171%
2671
35%
5739
190%
4830
144%
Seq Write
308.3
2384
673%
3978
1190%
1501
387%
4201
1263%
2032
559%
4K Read
24.04
29.75
24%
50.6
110%
39.65
65%
53.8
124%
62.3
159%
4K Write
113.7
52
-54%
156.2
37%
69
-39%
179.2
58%
146.4
29%
4K-64 Read
256.5
1193
365%
2465
861%
1209
371%
2959
1054%
1305
409%
4K-64 Write
242.8
1107
356%
3360
1284%
1650
580%
1891
679%
3708
1427%
Access Time Read *
0.15
0.136
9%
0.08
47%
0.093
38%
0.027
82%
0.029
81%
Access Time Write *
0.353
0.36
-2%
0.027
92%
0.055
84%
0.154
56%
0.027
92%
Score Read
478
1493
212%
3052
538%
1516
217%
3587
650%
1850
287%
Score Write
387
1397
261%
3914
911%
1869
383%
2490
543%
4058
949%
Score Total
1033
3636
252%
8449
718%
4105
297%
7821
657%
6724
551%
Copy ISO MB/s
278.1
1007
262%
3027
988%
1709
515%
Copy Program MB/s
282.3
43.11
-85%
1177
317%
1250
343%
Copy Game MB/s
284.2
621
119%
2170
664%
1909
572%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
141% / 154%
445% / 460%
156% / 166%
431% / 456%
354% / 376%

* ... smaller is better

Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2222 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 436 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 394.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 321 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1283 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 459.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 31.31 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 138.2 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

笔记本版的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070是笔记本电脑的最快显卡之一。这款拥有5120个着色器单元的专用显卡有8GB的GDDR6工作内存供其使用。虽然工作内存可以被目前的游戏完全用完,但对于微星GF66的全高清分辨率来说是足够的。然而,3DMark基准测试的结果表明,该显卡无法开发其全部潜力。其他采用Nvidia芯片的游戏笔记本电脑取得的分数明显更高。

对于要求不高的图形任务,该笔记本电脑还可以使用英特尔i7的集成UHD图形,这使得它在空闲运行时可以大大降低功耗。

在不插电的情况下,笔记本电脑不能从电池中获得足够的电力,以全速运行Nvidia芯片。在游戏和基准测试中的性能明显下降,约为在主电源运行时的三分之一。

3DMarkTime Spy 主电源操作
3DMarkTime Spy 主电源操作
3DMarkTime Spy 电池操作
3DMarkTime Spy 电池操作
3DMark Port Royal
3DMark Port Royal
3DMark夜间突袭
3DMark夜间突袭
3DMark野性生活无限
3DMark野性生活无限
3DMark 11的主电源操作
3DMark 11的主电源操作
3DMark 11电池操作
3DMark 11电池操作
 
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43891 Points +45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
42087 Points +39%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
36137 Points +19%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
35663 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (12535 - 38275, n=54)
32331 Points +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
30601 Points +1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
30339 Points
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31461 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
31341 Points
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
27266 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7178 - 29128, n=52)
24302 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
22864 Points
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
20703 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13142 Points +54%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
11916 Points +40%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
10250 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (2644 - 11019, n=53)
9300 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8523 Points 0%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8513 Points
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
7888 Points -7%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Average of class Gaming
  (261 - 21745, n=188, last 2 years)
12993 Points +49%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
11735 Points +35%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
10574 Points +21%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
10365 Points +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (2952 - 10872, n=54)
9246 Points +6%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8715 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8565 Points -2%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
7358 Points -16%
3DMark 11 Performance
10127 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
100884 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18594 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
10194 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8715 points
Help

游戏性能

微星笔记本电脑在我们测试的所有游戏中都提供了良好的结果。即使在最高质量设置下,全显示分辨率下的帧率也是可以接受的。

然而,在电池运行的游戏中,你必须期待一个明显的质量下降。在"TheWitcher 3"中,帧率下降了50多FPS(FHD/Ultra),在我们拔掉笔记本后。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (40.1 - 449, n=119, last 2 years)
243 fps +99%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
198 (174min - 226max) fps +62%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
197.3 (176min - 233max) fps +62%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
173 fps +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (122.1 - 207, n=34)
168 fps +38%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
132 fps +8%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H
126 (6.31min, 37.3P0.1, 79P1 - 291max) fps +3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
122.1 (44.1min, 61P0.1, 101.2P1 - 279.5max) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)
128.5 fps +59%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
108 (88min) fps +33%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
102.8 (96min - 107max) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (34.9 - 109, n=52)
91.8 fps +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
91.6 (76min) fps +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
86.5 fps +7%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
80.9 (70min) fps
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H
76.7 fps -5%
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
175 (4.22min, 125P1 - 371max) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
172 (4.4min, 125P1 - 386max) fps +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.2 - 187.1, n=144, last 2 years)
169.6 fps +3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
164 (3.97min, 111P1 - 299max) fps
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
159 (3.9min, 90.9P1 - 269max) fps -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
155 (5.89min, 100P1 - 291max) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (58.2 - 181.4, n=38)
153.2 fps -7%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H
111 (42.3min, 66.7P1 - 167max) fps -32%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.8 fps +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
110 (4.87min, 76.9P1 - 213max) fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
109 (6.01min, 76.9P1 - 225max) fps +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
95.4 (6.67min, 71.4P1 - 183max) fps +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
94 (19min, 66.7P1 - 198max) fps +1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
93.5 (9.58min, 62.5P1 - 166max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (21.7 - 125.8, n=50)
91 fps -3%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H
72.6 (23.9min, 50P1 - 139max) fps -22%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming
  (69.3 - 244, n=185, last 2 years)
162.2 fps +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
154 (134.3min) fps +16%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
151 (132.2min) fps +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
135.8 (116.9min) fps +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
135 (117.9min) fps +2%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
133 (116.8min) fps
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
131 (115.4min) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (30.9 - 178, n=59)
128.8 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
121 (107.1min) fps -9%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H
107 (92min) fps -20%
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (101.2 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)
146.8 fps +35%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
114 (96.1min) fps +5%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
109 (94.7min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (79.3 - 127.7, n=12)
108.6 fps 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
107.1 (93min) fps -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
107 (93min) fps -2%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.1 fps +59%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
105 fps +39%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
102 fps +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
97.1 fps +28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
88.9 fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (27.9 - 107, n=49)
86.4 fps +14%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
75.7 fps
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.5 - 169.2, n=132, last 2 years)
104.7 fps +86%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
80.6 fps +43%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
78.2 fps +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (19.8 - 79.9, n=25)
67.3 fps +20%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
66.5 fps +18%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
56.2 fps
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps +36%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
97.3 fps +22%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
84 fps +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
84 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
82.8 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (12.4 - 118.8, n=61)
81.1 fps +2%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
79.7 fps
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
79.7 fps 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
69.9 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
69.1 fps -13%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H
63.3 fps -21%
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (64.3 - 145.5, n=63, last 2 years)
104.1 fps +30%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
80.2 fps
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
80.2 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (49.6 - 98.7, n=13)
69.7 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
66 fps -18%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
57.8 fps -28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
57.8 fps -28%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 232, n=97, last 2 years)
140.2 fps +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
127 (94min - 165max) fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (93 - 137, n=26)
114.2 fps +1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
113 (87min - 134max) fps
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
112 (84min - 156max) fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
111 fps -2%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years)
131.2 fps +23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
120 (95min - 154max) fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (89 - 140, n=36)
108.6 fps +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
107 (77min - 139max) fps 0%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
107 (82min - 127max) fps
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
103 fps -4%
Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (135 - 145, n=2, last 2 years)
140 fps +36%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
103 (78min - 145max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (80 - 112, n=6)
102.5 fps 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
96 (74min - 139max) fps -7%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H
80 (62min) fps -22%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (49.4 - 465, n=151, last 2 years)
256 fps +57%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
221 (85.5min, 166P1 - 371max) fps +36%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
219 (143min, 164P1 - 355max) fps +34%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
204 (80.9min, 153P1 - 469max) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (39.6 - 225, n=35)
182 fps +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
173 (121min, 124P1 - 267max) fps +6%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
163 (49.1min, 121P1 - 390max) fps
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +60%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
197 (83.8min, 141P1 - 294max) fps +38%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
192 (92.1min, 144P1 - 332max) fps +34%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
179 (70.9min, 138P1 - 458max) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (36.2 - 194, n=46)
159 fps +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
152 (107min, 110P1 - 256max) fps +6%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
143 (88.3min, 108P1 - 260max) fps
F1 2021
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 470, n=16, last 2 years)
263 fps +63%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
218 (171min, 114P1 - 254max) fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (66.1 - 256, n=16)
181 fps +12%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
161 (141min, 101P1 - 178max) fps
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (27.6 - 271, n=16, last 2 years)
145.2 fps +59%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
119 (98min, 80P1 - 131max) fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (33.1 - 123.1, n=23)
99.5 fps +9%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
91.2 (80min, 73P1 - 101max) fps
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (74.3 - 204, n=12, last 2 years)
133.5 fps +99%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
89.8 (77min, 68P1 - 98max) fps +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (67.1 - 90.2, n=11)
82.7 fps +23%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
67.1 (59min, 58P1 - 74max) fps
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (50.2 - 115.1, n=6, last 2 years)
96.8 fps +161%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (37.1 - 51.1, n=3)
46 fps +24%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
37.1 (32min, 28P1 - 42max) fps
F1 2020
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
207 (151min - 236max) fps +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 344, n=3, last 2 years)
199.7 fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (118 - 238, n=7)
183.9 fps +16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
159 (145min - 170max) fps +1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
158 (141min - 172max) fps
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H
118 (106min) fps -25%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
173 (139min - 208max) fps +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 305, n=3, last 2 years)
166.8 fps +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (97 - 173, n=7)
141.3 fps +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
132 (110min - 153max) fps +6%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
125 (103min - 146max) fps
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H
97 (88min) fps -22%

"TheWitcher 3"的恒定负载测试中,帧率在最初的几分钟内下降得相当明显,然后在70 FPS左右趋于平稳。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø69.9 (64-81)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø86.5 (82-96)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø107.9 (104-111)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø90.1 (87-93)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø75.4 (72-78)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø92.9 (88-101)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 184 177 164 93.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 381.1 263.4 122.1 80.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 164 140 131 122 109
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 161 105 75.7 56.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 115 98.9 79.7 80.2
Far Cry 5 (2018) 158 122 113 107
Strange Brigade (2018) 405 199 163 143
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 133 108 103 91
F1 2020 (2020) 266 178 158 125
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 112.1 75.4 62 53.7
F1 2021 (2021) 276 179 161 91.2 67.1 37.1

排放物--微星笔记本电脑变得又吵又热

噪声排放

在 "正常 "风扇模式下,风扇不会变得非常响亮,但它们也不会自行转到全速。这意味着,在某些情况下,笔记本电脑会过热得相当快。另一方面,如果你使用组合键将风扇设置为全速运行,从长远来看,游戏笔记本的巨大噪音会变得相当恼人。因此,好的耳机是长时间游戏的必备品。

Noise Level

Idle
34 / 35 / 36 dB(A)
Load
48 / 49 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.749.839.838.845.1253744.241.235.940.8314548.149.742.847.9403334.63430.134.25028.326.940.840.730.36337.434.335.227.336.9802724.4251827.410025.620.420.417.226.212527.121.919.615.927.516027.324.22417.627.120029.522.520.819.728.725028.920.720.21527.731531.621.42113.930.740031.120.819.412.131.550031.422.320.712.629.763033.323.823.212.532.580032.422.522.511.832.9100036.526.825.912.236.1125039.127.627.512.338.5160041.628.227.61240.3200038.923.322.812.139.1250040.523.122.812.339.9315036.219.419.212.936400032.916.716.113.133.1500033.216.115.313.132.663003014.713.913.629.2800026.414.313.413.3251000021.713.813.11321.11250018.313.61312.9181600016.412.812.11215.5SPL48.835.334.825.148.2N5.921.90.65.7median 31.4median 21.4median 20.4median 12.9median 30.7Delta4.63.83.91.73.830.122.223.324.127.228.62829.230.331.231.832.134.83638.137.236.637.138.940.238.538.740.140.739.336.8332823.219.650.47.4median 36.64.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Katana GF66 11UG-220Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)

温度

在压力测试中,笔记本电脑的表面变得相当热。在游戏时,键盘的温度会在长时间内变得不舒服。然而,如果你休息一下,表面温度也会迅速下降,10分钟后表面已经感觉凉爽。笔记本电脑的掌托和ClickPad在任何情况下都不会变热。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试

在不把风扇转速提高到全速的情况下,CPU和GPU在压力测试中过热相当快,然后被节流。在第一次压力测试中,我们创建了笔记本电脑的热图。当时,UEFI中的性能计划被设置为平衡模式。在第二次压力测试中,我们使用了UEFI中的性能模式。总的来说,我们确定图形和处理器温度几乎没有受到影响。

在第二次压力测试之后,我们在风扇以最大速度运行的情况下,将笔记本电脑又运行了20分钟。在此期间,CPU和GPU的平均温度分别下降了约5℃(9°F)。

Max. Load
 52 °C56 °C50 °C 
 50 °C54 °C47 °C 
 40 °C34 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 56 °C
Average: 46.6 °C
48 °C45 °C49 °C
43 °C45 °C40 °C
31 °C30 °C27 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 39.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  49 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).

发言人

微星GF66的扬声器听起来相当尖锐,而且声音不是特别大。如果风扇全速运转,扬声器的音量就很难满足。幸运的是,你也可以通过音频端口或蓝牙连接外部扬声器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.837.12535.937.53142.846.54030.134.65040.741.76327.341.4801831.510017.229.312515.935.116017.637.720019.738.62501547.931513.952.240012.154.750012.659.463012.562.980011.870.7100012.273.9125012.368.916001264.8200012.161.3250012.361.4315012.961.7400013.162.3500013.161.9630013.661.6800013.363.5100001359.91250012.959.6160001259.3SPL25.178N0.639.4median 12.9median 61.3Delta1.75.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.432.935.232.926.922.326.921.620.121.629.725.229.733.233.733.23733.7372822.42820.224.620.218.639.718.617.750.617.722.25822.216.758.516.713.263.513.214.165.414.111.270.611.210.873.710.810.866.810.810.660.610.611.36011.31156.31110.65510.611.259.211.211.464.611.411.565.311.511.752.911.711.85411.811.751.211.711.752.611.711.456.311.41151.31124.176.124.10.636.90.6median 11.5median 58median 11.525.92hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Katana GF66 11UG-220Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 强大的90Wh电池最多可以持续9小时

消耗功率

微星GF66游戏笔记本的功耗明显低于平均水平,该笔记本在这里显然比大多数竞争对手更有效率。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8 / 12 / 22 Watt
Load midlight 98 / 162 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-64%
6%
-61%
-34%
-42%
Idle Minimum *
8
10.45
-31%
23
-188%
9
-13%
19.5
-144%
15
-88%
Idle Average *
12
14.92
-24%
26
-117%
11
8%
23.3
-94%
17
-42%
Idle Maximum *
22
16.02
27%
34
-55%
16
27%
40.1
-82%
22
-0%
Load Average *
98
119.65
-22%
99
-1%
107
-9%
98.9
-1%
101
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
152
174.9
-15%
163
-7%
121
20%
174
-14%
195
-28%
Load Maximum *
162
187.26
-16%
190
-17%
162
-0%
214
-32%
230
-42%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220: Ø152.5 (149-159)

电池寿命

冲浪时超过5小时,空闲时超过9小时,微星笔记本电脑的电池提供了相当体面的运行时间。在满负荷的情况下,如果考虑到高系统性能,70分钟的电池寿命也是不错的。总的来说,目前的游戏笔记本电脑已经获得了一些耐力。有了这些数值,GF66笔记本电脑在去年仍会取得相当好的成绩,但目前这只能让它处于该领域的中间位置。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
9h 07min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 10min
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 93 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-2%
60%
74%
11%
69%
15%
Reader / Idle
547
548
0%
957
75%
WiFi v1.3
317
420
32%
508
60%
544
72%
353
11%
338
7%
Load
70
44
-37%
161
130%
Witcher 3 ultra
131
H.264
352

Pros

+ 坚固的案例
+ 分离式设计
+ 144-Hz面板
+ 升级选项

Cons

- 边缘的小电源
- 浪费了性能潜力(关键词:TGP
- 连接很少(例如没有Thunderbolt)。
- 负载下的高排放

结论 - 有待改进

微星GF66 11UG-220由NBB.com(notebooksbilliger.de)提供。
微星GF66 11UG-220由NBB.com(notebooksbilliger.de)提供。

微星Katana GF6611UG-220是一个坚实的游戏设备。然而,你会在这台笔记本电脑中徒劳地寻找任何特殊的性能或设备特性。另一方面,它的性能也不必隐藏。至少在移动PC领域,目前英特尔处理器的性能接近强大的AMD处理器。有了NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070,你至少可以获得一个体面的游戏体验。

不幸的是,微星Katana GF66并没有充分开发其潜力。

这款游戏笔记本的可用软件(至少在测试时的德国微星主页上)还有待改进。我们至少希望有一个工具来控制性能,而不必重新启动笔记本电脑。键盘的驱动程序也可以有一些改进。

特别是在Nvidia芯片的性能方面,我们还可以想到通过使用更大的电源来进行一些改进。显卡的性能明显受到85瓦的微薄TGP的阻碍。

然而,我们也得出总体结论,这款游戏笔记本电脑运行得很干净。那些不看每一帧帧率的人将能够在没有任何问题的情况下用这台笔记本电脑玩目前的游戏,获得一些乐趣。

尽管这款笔记本电脑的价格水平仍处于入门级领域,但目前约1600欧元(约1891美元)的购买价格对于没有Windows系统的笔记本电脑来说相当高。

价格和可用性

微星Katana GF66 11UG-600配备英特尔Core i7和Nvidia RTX 3050,目前可从亚马逊售价1699美元在美国。

MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 - 09/13/2021 v7 (old)
Marc Herter

Chassis
71 / 98 → 73%
Keyboard
75%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
48 / 80 → 60%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 92%
Battery
65 / 95 → 68%
Display
85%
Games Performance
92%
Application Performance
91%
Temperature
79 / 95 → 83%
Noise
64 / 90 → 71%
Audio
71%
Camera
35 / 85 → 41%
Average
70%
79%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微星Katana GF66 11UG评论。浪费了潜力的游戏笔记本
Marc Herter, 2021-09-14 (Update: 2024-11- 4)