LG Gram Style 14 笔记本电脑评测：优雅、快速、（太）热

Name: LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG
Brand: LG

闪亮轻盈。

这款来自 LG 的子笔记本仅重 1 千克（约 2.2 磅），却配备了英特尔酷睿 i7-1360P、32 GB 工作内存和 OLED 显示屏。除了性能之外，Gram Style 还具备其他一些特质。最让我们眼前一亮的是它的外壳表面可以闪烁出各种彩虹色。除了一些奇怪的例外情况，这款笔记本电脑还能完全安静地运行。

Mario Petzold, 👁 Marc Herter (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/31/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Intel Evo Raptor Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

LG Gram Style 14 的重点是移动性。它重量轻、机身非常小巧却配备了 14 英寸显示屏、电池续航时间长，这些优势完全符合这一目标。同时，由于配备了英特尔 Raptor Lake P 系列的 i5 或 i7 处理器，因此在计算性能方面没有丝毫让步。其他设备也符合高档要求，包括 3K OLED 显示屏、高质量输入设备、大容量和快速存储。

比较特别的是掌托和整个显示屏盖子的颜色设计，它并不普通。另一方面，由于采用了被动模式，这款笔记本电脑还能保持真正的独立，而在其他笔记本电脑中，只有 MacBook Air 15 M2 才能提供类似的强大功能。Apple MacBook Air 15 M2.

其他一些移动性和速度类似的竞争对手有惠普蜻蜓 G4或三星Galaxy Book3 Pro 14显示屏完全相同。在我们的测试中，你会发现竞争对手在哪些方面做得更好，LG Gram Style 在哪些方面做得很好，以及为什么它仍然不能保持完全安静。

Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG (gram Style 14 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-1360P 12 x 1.6 - 5 GHz, 43 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-P

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Memory

32 GB

, LPDDR5-6000, dual channel

Display

14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, Samsung SDC417F ATNA40YK10-1, OLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, 1024 GB

, 2 x 1 TB

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Headset, Card Reader: microSD

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16.5 x 312 x 213

Battery

72 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FHD webcam
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix FullHD webcam with IR and dual array microphone

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, LG Smart Assistant 2.0, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

987 g, Power Supply: 196 g

Price

1700 Euro

Links

LG homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
90 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	987 g	16.5 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
91.9 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.1 kg	16.3 mm	13.50"	1920x1280
91.8 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU	1.5 kg	11.5 mm	15.30"	2880x1864
89.6 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.3 kg	15.6 mm	14.20"	3120x2080
89.5 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	989 g	14.8 mm	13.00"	2160x1350
85.6 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	11.3 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
85 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	990 g	10.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

案例 - 色彩丰富，结构薄弱

LG Gram Style 的外壳乍一看是白色的。只要光线从侧面照射到它，颜色就会发生变化，即使是不连续的变化，包括一些彩虹效果。同时，外壳表面对指纹也有较强的抵抗力。不过，一旦我们注意到一些指纹，也只能用湿润的超细纤维布进行清洁。

在做工方面，我们没有任何抱怨。笔记本电脑组装得很干净，考虑到其尺寸和重量，显得足够稳定。尽管显示屏可能会变形，但这并不超出我们对其超薄显示屏边框的预期。机箱底部也可以向下按压，因此用户在打开盖子或抬起 LG Gram Style 时可能会感觉必须特别轻柔。

键盘边框和掌托则由金属制成，几乎没有任何松动，在打字和操作笔记本电脑时给人一种坚实的感觉。

充电器的重量甚至不到 200 克。2 米（6 英尺）长的电缆即使在充电时也能提供一定的自由度。

在重量方面，没有任何一款竞争对手能与 LG 的子笔记本相提并论。三星三星Galaxy Book3 Pro的重量要重 20%。此外，它的机身还深了 1 厘米（约 0.4 英寸）。Gram Style 的占地面积接近一张 A4 纸。

另一方面，Gram Style 的外壳厚度仅为一般水平，而许多专注于最小尺寸格式的竞争对手，如 Apple MacBook Air或三星Galaxy Book3 Pro甚至要纤薄得多。不过，在携带笔记本电脑时，设备的厚度可能没有宽度和长度那么重要。

尺寸比较

LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 HP Dragonfly G4 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 基本连接基本足够

连接的数量确实少得不能再少，但左侧的两个 Thunderbolt 4 连接仍然提供了很多使用选择。其中一个连接还能在充电时使用。如果在桌面上使用额外的扩展坞，还可以连接其他任何设备。

在路上，耳机端口、microSD 卡插槽和单个 10 Gbit/s USB-A 端口几乎总能提供足够的连接选择。即使从实际可用性的角度来看，连接的选择似乎很合适，但其数量也可能相当有限。

SD 读卡器

在复制图像文件时，我们的 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 参考卡提供了平均值，例如，在接近 7 分钟的时间内就能复制一张 32 GB 的完整卡。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5320-TM4V2 Intel Core i5-1135G7 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	191 MB/s +153%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	75.6 MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W Intel Core i7-1165G7	75.1 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	71.3 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	57.8 MB/s -24%
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years)	52.8 MB/s -30%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5320-TM4V2 Intel Core i5-1135G7 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	205 MB/s +156%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	89.3 MB/s +11%
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W Intel Core i7-1165G7	84.1 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H	80.5 MB/s 0%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	80.2 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years)	64.3 MB/s -20%

交流

焊接的英特尔 AX211 WLAN 模块至少能在 6 GHz 频段正常工作。尽管附近没有其他 WLAN 信号可能会干扰我们的测量，但在 5 GHz 频段的测试结果仍略低于平均水平。

在实际使用中，即使是接近 1,000 Mbit/s 的速度也绝对出色。只要与同样具有 Wi-Fi 6E 功能的路由器之间的距离尽可能小，使用 Wi-Fi 6E 时超过 1,600 Mbit/s 的传输速率将大大超过简单的局域网连接。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1626 (1558^min - 1664^max) MBit/s +74%
Average of class Subnotebook (467 - 1824, n=55, last 2 years)	1264 MBit/s +35%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=237)	1235 MBit/s +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1232 (966^min - 1415^max) MBit/s +32%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	973 (879^min - 1016^max) MBit/s +4%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	936 (757^min - 989^max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	920 (862^min, 866.35^P1 - 953^max) MBit/s -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	591 (549^min - 636^max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1579 (1502^min - 1603^max) MBit/s +70%
Average of class Subnotebook (826 - 1775, n=55, last 2 years)	1426 MBit/s +54%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=237)	1377 MBit/s +48%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1299 (1181^min - 1400^max) MBit/s +40%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1200 (1059^min - 1247^max) MBit/s +29%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	938 (925^min - 950^max) MBit/s +1%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	928 (467^min - 946^max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	858 (810^min, 818.41^P1 - 880^max) MBit/s -8%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1640 (1599^min - 1681^max) MBit/s +1%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1630 (1558^min - 1666^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1418 (937^min - 1499^max) MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=210)	1372 MBit/s -16%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1353 (1192^min - 1386^max) MBit/s -17%
Average of class Subnotebook (642 - 1792, n=26, last 2 years)	1267 MBit/s -22%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1243 (776^min - 1326^max) MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1682 (868^min - 1746^max) MBit/s +1%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1665 (1588^min - 1693^max) MBit/s
Average of class Subnotebook (951 - 1784, n=26, last 2 years)	1516 MBit/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1511 (1483^min - 1524^max) MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=209)	1492 MBit/s -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1302 (1171^min - 1381^max) MBit/s -22%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1234 (1042^min - 1336^max) MBit/s -26%

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1630 (1558-1666)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1353 (1192-1386)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1640 (1599-1681)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1588-1693)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1653 (868-1746)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1510 (1483-1524)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (757-989)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø591 (549-636)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1626 (1558-1664)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø912 (467-946)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø938 (925-950)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1579 (1502-1603)

网络摄像头

全高清网络摄像头非常适合视频通话，图像质量令人满意。尤其是在光线不足的情况下，摄像头仍能提供易于识别的记录效果。不过，这时候你最好不要穿黑色衣服，因为至少在我们的测试设备中，所有黑色衣服都会被录制成绿色。

此外，还有一个红外摄像头，支持通过人脸识别登录。没有机械镜头盖。

麦克风适合目标使用场景。即使与扬声器的距离和说话角度不同，录制的声音也清晰易懂，音量均匀。轻微的金属音至少不会影响视频通话。

ColorChecker LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG: 8.44 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 16.26 ∆E

维护

密封的底板不太便于维护。您需要一些技巧和合适的工具，才能在不造成任何损坏的情况下取下五个胶粘脚垫和另外三个螺丝盖。但在此之后，拆卸底板就没有什么困难了。不过，在笔记本电脑使用两三年后，拆卸工作可能会变得更加困难。根据我们的经验，一旦胶水变硬，就很难再完整地拆下橡胶脚垫了。

在内部，电池和风扇都很容易接触到。您还可以更换或扩展两个 M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘。单个 2 TB SSD 也能很好地工作，并能更轻松地扩展存储空间。同时，并行安装的两个固态硬盘还可以作为永久系统备份。WLAN 模块和内存是焊接在一起的，考虑到机身纤薄，这并不令人感到惊讶。

显示屏铰链显得有些过于精致。尽管 LG Gram 重量很轻，但如果铰链面积更大，折叠装置的稳定性就会大大提高。

保修、配件和包装

LG 为 Gram Style 14Z90RS 提供两年保修，但对电池只提供法律规定的最低保修。

除了充电器、USB-C 至 USB-C 连接线（仅适用于充电）和保修材料外，包装盒内没有其他配件。包装本身几乎完全由回收的卡纸组成，值得称赞。遗憾的是，LG Gram 本身被放置在一个由混合材料制成的塑料盒内，因此无法回收利用。

输入设备 - 漂亮但不一定实用的 Gram 风格

键盘几乎值得最高的赞誉。1.6 毫米的键程（根据我们的测量）、良好的阻力调节和坚固的键盘框架带来了极佳的键入体验。唯一的缺点可能是白键的白色照明。当傍晚光线变暗时，如果你想启动键盘照明功能，你会发现再也看不清按键上的任何东西了。不过，在完全黑暗的环境中，照明效果还是很均匀的，尽管它可以使用两个以上的亮度级别。

触摸板的操作非常准确，能立即响应任何指令，而且视觉效果很好。与此同时，它也存在一些严重的缺陷。首先，它的边缘只能通过两条精致的灯带来识别。虽然这看起来很不错，但我们并没有注意到，在测试过程中，我们的手指多次游离于触摸板区域之外，以至于无法再操作触摸板。不过，你可能会习惯这一点。

真正与众不同的是按键的反馈。LG 在 Gram Style 中没有使用任何机械按键，而是使用了电磁线性按键。也许你已经从 iPhone 的 Home 键上了解到了类似的功能。遗憾的是，按键的噪音对我们来说似乎太大了。尤其是在激活被动模式，而笔记本电脑保持完全安静的情况下。

尽管按键噪音当然是由软件控制的，但这种行为无法关闭或调整。虽然在不按触摸板按键的情况下也能进行常规操作，但我们也注意到，当手指接触触摸板的时间较长时，按键也会被激活并发出声音。在这种情况下，由于没有按下任何按键，反馈会变得加倍刺激。

显示屏 - OLED，色彩还原度高

LG Gram Style 14 亚笔记本的 OLED 显示屏提供了所有应有的功能。由于黑色值极小，对比度非常好，因此色彩鲜艳明亮。即使不进行校准，色彩还原也非常准确，色彩空间范围非常大。

2,880 x 1,800 像素的分辨率被广泛称为 3K，可呈现极其细腻的图像。但在只有 14 英寸的情况下，这似乎也有点夸张。如果放大到 100%，文字几乎无法阅读。在这种尺寸下，如果分辨率稍低一些，也能节省一些电池寿命，那肯定就足够了，而高分辨率的照片在屏幕上仍然会非常出色。

LG 能够显著弥补 OLED 显示屏的一大弱点。其他机型会出现 60 或 120 Hz 的 PWM 闪烁，而 Gram Style 至少能将频率提高到 350 Hz，大多数用户应该不会再感觉到这一数值。只有那些特别敏感和有过不良经历的人可能还会注意到一些闪烁。在这种情况下，唯一有帮助的办法就是选择配备不使用 PWM 闪烁的 IPS 面板的笔记本电脑，例如惠普蜻蜓 G4.

亚像素网格可能会带来一些轻微的边缘冲蚀。不过，由于分辨率足够高，基本上只有在放大镜下才能看到这种现象，即使在放大镜下也只能勉强看到。没有光晕或屏幕出血现象。即使在长时间曝光的情况下，显示屏仍然是完全黑色的。


394 cd/m²	387 cd/m²	386 cd/m²
389 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	386 cd/m²
388 cd/m²	388 cd/m²	386 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung SDC417F ATNA40YK10-1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 394 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 387.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.788 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 380 cd/m²
Contrast: 7111:1 (Black: 0.054 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.81
ΔE Greyscale 2.63 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Samsung SDC417F ATNA40YK10-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	HP Dragonfly G4 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5"	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 MND007ZA1-3, IPS, 2160x1350, 13"	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Samsung ATNA40CU02-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Display		-20%	-3%	-7%	-19%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	99.92	68.4 -32%	98.7 -1%	89.8 -10%	68.5 -31%	99.7 0%
sRGB Coverage	100	98.3 -2%	99.9 0%	99.4 -1%	99.5 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	94.71	70.4 -26%	87.9 -7%	84.2 -11%	69.7 -26%	95.7 1%
Response Times		-1903%	-1093%	14440%	-1543%	46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2 ?(1, 1)	48.8 ?(22.9, 25.9) -2340%	28.8 ?(14.2, 14.6) -1340%	20 ?(6, 14) -900%	39.9 ?(18.7, 21.2) -1895%	0.5 ?(290, 280) 75%
Response Time Black / White *	2 ?(1, 1)	31.3 ?(16.3, 15) -1465%	18.9 ?(8.5, 10.4) -845%	7 ?(2, 5) -250%	25.8 ?(11.8, 14) -1190%	0.1 ?(80, 80) 95%
PWM Frequency	350			156000 ?(50) 44471%		240 ?(100) -31%
Screen		-50%	-50%	-37%	-37%	61%
Brightness middle	384	408.8 6%	517 35%	595 55%	461.2 20%	409 7%
Brightness	388	399 3%	501 29%	550 42%	428 10%	410 6%
Brightness Distribution	97	90 -7%	93 -4%	85 -12%	86 -11%	99 2%
Black Level *	0.054	0.32 -493%	0.39 -622%	0.25 -363%	0.29 -437%	0.01 81%
Contrast	7111	1278 -82%	1326 -81%	2380 -67%	1590 -78%	40900 475%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.47	2.02 18%	1.2 51%	2.01 19%	1.79 28%	2.36 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.33	3.84 11%	2.5 42%	6.9 -59%	3.3 24%	4.07 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.81	0.61 78%	0.8 72%	1.22 57%	0.47 83%	3.16 -12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.63	2.3 13%	1.8 32%	2.74 -4%	1.8 32%	3.06 -16%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.2 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2.4 ^92%	2.24 ^98%	2.49 ^88%
CCT	6279 ^104%	6203 ^105%		6319 ^103%	6588 ^99%	6882 ^94%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-658% / -308%	-382% / -189%	4799% / 2864%	-533% / -248%	36% / 46%

* ... smaller is better

色彩还原的范围非常广泛。基本上完全覆盖了专业视频制作所使用的 DCI-P3 色彩空间，这一点非常了不起。

在任何情况下，该显示器都能满足更高的要求，而且还能用于高水平的图像和视频处理。

当 DeltaE 小于 3 时，即使是训练有素的肉眼也无法察觉色彩再现方面的偏差。虽然在几个蓝色和红色色调方面的偏差略高，但 DeltaE 勉勉强强超过 4 时，偏差仍然非常有限。

额外的校准并没有带来进一步的改善。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

350 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 350 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 350 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

OLED 显示屏的亮度足以让文字在户外清晰可读。虽然图像看起来不再那么鲜艳，但仍然很容易辨认。在阳光直射下，反光表面会影响屏幕内容的阅读。

无论从哪个角度观看，色彩都不会发生变化，亮度也不会变暗。只有在接近 90° 的陡峭视角下，才会出现明显的轻微偏差。这是 OLED 显示屏的典型表现。

性能 - 即使在省电模式下，i7-1360P 也能保持强劲性能

配备英特尔酷睿 i7-1360PLG Gram Style 14 采用的 CPU 不仅性能高，而且移动性好。此外，32 GB LPDDR5 工作内存可确保快速的数据传输速率，最大带宽达 6,000 MHz。

有了它，计算性能就能达到优秀商务笔记本电脑的大致水平。对于 LG Gram Style 来说，复杂的应用程序和多任务处理都不在话下。另一方面，对图形要求极高的应用程序则几乎无法使用。iGPU 的性能足以满足视频流媒体甚至是少量非商业领域的图像和视频处理需求，但 3D 应用程序和视频渲染却难以以合理的方式运行。

我们的测试设备无法运行 CPU-Z，即使在重置系统后，程序仍会出现一些蓝屏。

测试条件

预装的 LG 智能助理提供了一些非常实用的设置选项。除了与 OLED 显示屏结合使用可明显延长电池寿命的暗光模式或改变色温的选项外，使用场景也会对子笔记本的行为产生一些重要影响。在 "工作 "模式下，LG Gram Style 可提供最高的计算性能。在 "学习 "模式下，LG Gram Style 可以安静运行，并限制显示屏的蓝光强度。

不过，所选冷却模式对计算性能的影响最大。我们在下表列出了 CPU 的功耗限制。由于 "高 "风扇设置可提供最佳的计算性能，因此我们使用该设置进行基准测试。

风扇配置文件	无噪音	低	正常	高
CPU PL2	43 瓦	43 瓦	43 瓦	43 瓦
CPU PL1	8 瓦	12 瓦	26 瓦	28 瓦

处理器

英特尔英特尔酷睿 i7-1360P共有 12 个内核，其中 4 个为性能内核，16 个线程，主频为 5.0 GHz。它是目前速度最快的移动处理器之一。不过，它无法赶上英特尔酷睿 i5-13500H相比，英特尔酷睿 i5-13500H 处理器的结构让人联想到台式机 CPU，而且其所需的空间和功耗也要大得多。

除了计算性能，该处理器的第二个优势是高效。在大多数简单的任务中，它几乎不消耗任何电能，而且相应的热量也很低，几乎不需要任何冷却。LG Gram Style 的情况更是如此，CPU 的峰值功耗为 43 瓦，只比华为 MateBook X Pro 的功耗低，华为 MateBook X Pro 的功耗高达 64 瓦。因此，采用相同处理器的竞争对手整体表现略胜一筹也就不足为奇了。

在使用 Cinebench R15 进行的持续负载测试中，得出的图表与大多数同类亚笔记本电脑相似。由于散热选项有限，第一次运行后数值下降了约 20%。之后，这些数值保持稳定，说明散热能力足够。

拔掉插头后，我们上面列出的 CPU 性能设置选项和限制保持不变。这意味着 LG Gram 在电池工作时也能保持其全部性能。

您可以在我们的 CPU 基准测试列表.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1209 (1178.03-1454.97)

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2: Ø1063 (973.83-1209.85)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1613 (1476.83-1993.62)

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1109 (808.08-1572.33)

Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 Intel Core i5-13500H: Ø1975 (1838.4-2234.26)

LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1029 (774.98-1497.06)

LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1284 (755.32-1642.37)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	83.1 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	78.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1360P	77.7 pt
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	74.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	70.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	70.7 pt
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	69.7 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB ^-5! Apple M2	66.7 pt
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	63.6 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years)	11706 Points +37%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	11571 Points +35%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (6390 - 12637, n=16)	10472 Points +22%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	9494 Points +11%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	8569 Points 0%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	8557 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	8472 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	8198 (6706.67^min - 8197.58^max) Points -4%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	7532 (5307.67^min - 7531.78^max) Points -12%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	1891 Points +18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	1848 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1596 - 1909, n=16)	1787 Points +12%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	1760 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	1704 Points +7%
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years)	1669 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	1665 Points +4%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	1596 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	1589 Points 0%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years)	4548 Points +39%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	4526 Points +38%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (2474 - 4887, n=16)	4033 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	3526 Points +8%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	3515 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	3286 Points 0%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	3273 Points
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	2902 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	2324 Points -29%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	719 Points +18%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	703 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (611 - 736, n=16)	689 Points +13%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	669 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	668 Points +9%
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years)	636 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	634 Points +4%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	611 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	431 Points -29%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	2008 Points +38%
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years)	1987 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1079 - 2214, n=16)	1793 Points +23%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	1642 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	1593 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	1572 (808.08^min - 1572.33^max) Points +8%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	1455 (1178.03^min - 1454.97^max) Points
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	1348 (1014.74^min - 1347.89^max) Points -7%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	1209.9 (973.83^min, 974.802^P1 - 1209.85^max) Points -17%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	267 Points +48%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	261 Points +45%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	249 Points +38%
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years)	249 Points +38%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (180 - 271, n=16)	248 Points +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	239 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	237 Points +32%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	222 Points +23%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	180 Points

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	597 Seconds * -54%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	430 Seconds * -11%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	387 Seconds *
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	381 Seconds * +2%
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years)	359 Seconds * +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	357 Seconds * +8%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	352 Seconds * +9%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (268 - 496, n=17)	331 Seconds * +14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	295 Seconds * +24%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years)	48778 MIPS +32%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	45679 MIPS +24%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (26534 - 52959, n=16)	42429 MIPS +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	38344 MIPS +4%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	38283 MIPS +4%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	36940 MIPS
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	33476 MIPS -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	33022 MIPS -11%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	5835 MIPS +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	5756 MIPS +24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	5729 MIPS +23%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	5717 MIPS +23%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (4647 - 5973, n=16)	5625 MIPS +21%
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years)	5486 MIPS +18%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	5368 MIPS +16%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	4647 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years)	10113 Points +17%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	9967 Points +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	9678 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (7549 - 10817, n=17)	9644 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	9084 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	8961 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	8909 Points +3%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	8778 Points +2%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	8621 Points

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	1917 Points +34%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	1902 Points +33%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	1830 Points +28%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	1804 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	1794 Points +25%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	1792 Points +25%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1435 - 1871, n=17)	1788 Points +25%
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years)	1783 Points +24%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	1435 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years)	13 fps +31%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	12.7 fps +28%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (6.9 - 14.2, n=16)	11.6 fps +17%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	10.8 fps +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	10.1 fps +2%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	9.89 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	9.2 fps -7%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	8.61 fps -13%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years)	54.7 s * -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	51.1 s * -3%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	49.6 s *
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (40.3 - 57.2, n=16)	45.8 s * +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	45.5 s * +8%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	45.3 s * +9%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	45 s * +9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	40.3 s * +19%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P	0.566 sec *
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years)	0.518 sec * +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P	0.4895 sec * +14%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	0.4895 sec * +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P	0.4834 sec * +15%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (0.445 - 0.583, n=16)	0.4805 sec * +15%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U	0.4586 sec * +19%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P	0.4578 sec * +19%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1455 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

64.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

180 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3273 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

611 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1596 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

8557 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Subnotebook	94.9 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	86.3 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1360P	77.6 pt
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	68.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	63.8 pt
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	60.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years)	12858 KRay/s +64%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	9618 KRay/s +23%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (5610 - 11188, n=17)	8919 KRay/s +14%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7838 KRay/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7483 KRay/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6868 KRay/s -12%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6720 KRay/s -14%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years)	61107 Points +49%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48441 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (29251 - 56942, n=16)	45807 Points +11%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41145 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38303 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	35934 Points -13%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	33777 Points -18%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years)	2891 MB/s +50%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2404 MB/s +25%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1444 - 2728, n=16)	2221 MB/s +15%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1930 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1818 MB/s -6%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1754 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1701 MB/s -12%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	89068 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	84106 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (65324 - 89266, n=16)	80667 Points +8%
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years)	80395 Points +8%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74566 Points
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	69991 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	69728 Points -6%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years)	8218 Points +52%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6597 Points +22%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (4370 - 7269, n=16)	6097 Points +13%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5415 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5361 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4838 Points -11%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4589 Points -15%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years)	31746 Points +64%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	23884 Points +23%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (14104 - 28019, n=16)	22464 Points +16%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	19395 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	18819 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	17384 Points -10%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	16808 Points -13%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	87671 MB/s +131%
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years)	60483 MB/s +59%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (30391 - 99244, n=16)	60351 MB/s +59%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	54106 MB/s +43%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	37967 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	37413 MB/s -1%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	34968 MB/s -8%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years)	745 MB/s +36%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	686 MB/s +25%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (420 - 807, n=16)	647 MB/s +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	553 MB/s +1%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	549 MB/s
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	519 MB/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	507 MB/s -8%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years)	6677 KRay/s +62%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5193 KRay/s +26%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (2906 - 5957, n=16)	4802 KRay/s +16%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4129 KRay/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3994 KRay/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3743 KRay/s -9%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3513 KRay/s -15%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44535 MPixel/s 0%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44495 MPixel/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44286 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (29108 - 49328, n=16)	40910 MPixel/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years)	39998 MPixel/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	39531 MPixel/s -11%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	37846 MPixel/s -15%

系统性能

PCMark 10 基准测试很好地反映了笔记本电脑在日常运行中的表现。与三星Galaxy Book3 Pro和华为 MateBook X Pro和华为 MateBook X Pro i7-1360P处理器，但其功耗却非常低。在上网、视频通话或运行 Office 程序时，有限的功耗不会产生太大影响。

当在 LG 智能助手中降低风扇性能时，数值会下降约 10%。不过，选择被动模式的影响要大得多，因为处理器只能持续使用 8 瓦的功率，而不是 28 瓦。这样，数值就会下降到Apple MacBook Air 或 2019 年的 Acer Swift 3 SF314 的水平。

尽管性能降低非常明显，但在上网、阅读文本文档、创建电子表格或执行类似任务时，影响微乎其微。这意味着在许多情况下，你可以在完全关闭风扇的情况下使用 Gram Style，它仍能流畅地执行日常任务，与一台性能良好但使用了四年的笔记本电脑不相上下。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years)	6427 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5360 - 6281, n=14)	5863 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	5796 Points +3%
HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	5690 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	5672 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	5635 Points 0%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5621 Points
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, 511BS0512HB-TX01	5104 Points -9%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	3179 Points -43%
Apple Macbook Air 2019 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256	2491 Points -56%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9883 - 12059, n=14)	11001 Points +3%
HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	10853 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	10667 Points 0%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10630 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	10611 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years)	10486 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, 511BS0512HB-TX01	9934 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	9883 Points -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	6911 Points -35%
Apple Macbook Air 2019 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256	5752 Points -46%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years)	8627 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	7430 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6572 - 8161, n=14)	7254 Points 0%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7244 Points
HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	7206 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	7180 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	7010 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, 511BS0512HB-TX01	6593 Points -9%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	5274 Points -27%
Apple Macbook Air 2019 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256	4458 Points -38%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years)	8048 Points +29%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	6982 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5723 - 7612, n=14)	6877 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	6702 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	6494 Points +4%
HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	6392 Points +2%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6259 Points
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, 511BS0512HB-TX01	5511 Points -12%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	2392 Points -62%
Apple Macbook Air 2019 UHD Graphics 617, i5-8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256	1637 Points -74%

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1876 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	1748 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1527 - 1891, n=15)	1710 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1668 Points +1%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1656 Points
HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	1628 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years)	1578 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1520 Points -8%
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, 511BS0512HB-TX01	1395 Points -16%

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1829 Points +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	1666 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1503 - 1842, n=15)	1645 Points +4%
HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	1620 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1608 Points +2%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1583 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years)	1521 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, 511BS0512HB-TX01	1449 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1418 Points -10%

CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	1951 Points +7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1917 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1558 - 2003, n=15)	1834 Points +1%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1817 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1777 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1747 Points -4%
HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	1731 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years)	1729 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, 511BS0512HB-TX01	1330 Points -27%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	1899 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1616 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1311 - 1899, n=15)	1561 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	1450 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook D 14 2023, 53013PKG Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, 511BS0512HB-TX01	1439 Points 0%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1435 Points
HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	1373 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years)	1350 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1171 Points -18%

PCMark 10 Score		5621 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	71500 MB/s +4%
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years)	70251 MB/s +2%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	68974 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	68962 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64187 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (44299 - 72748, n=16)	63486 MB/s -8%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58331 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years)	67358 MB/s +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65355 MB/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64931 MB/s +12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	63509 MB/s +10%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (44751 - 68945, n=16)	59126 MB/s +2%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57933 MB/s
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	49203 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	93331 MB/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	88805 MB/s +7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	83155 MB/s 0%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	82872 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (45887 - 93331, n=16)	74804 MB/s -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years)	73251 MB/s -12%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	70434 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years)	107.2 ns * -12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	106.4 ns * -12%
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (85 - 110.5, n=16)	97.4 ns * -2%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	95.4 ns *
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	93.2 ns * +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	92.7 ns * +3%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	90.2 ns * +5%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

至少与我们的同类子笔记本相比，LG Gram Style 在延迟方面表现尚可。不过，在执行实时音频处理等要求特别高的任务时，可能会出现一些卡顿。但不得不承认的是，Gram 并不是为此而设计的。此外，一些驱动程序更新或新软件也可能会大大改变结果。

在用 YouTube 流式传输 4K 视频时，只出现了一次丢帧。虽然这并不是一个完美的结果，但对于硬件来说已经很不错了。不过，当 iGPU 负载接近 30% 时，结果会非常高。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	6070.1 μs * -292%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	2122.6 μs * -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	2039.3 μs * -32%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1550 μs *
HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	1181 μs * +24%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

系统固态硬盘在多项测试和规范中均达到了使用 PCIe 4.0 连接应达到的预期结果。第二块相同的固态硬盘也达到了相同的水平。

不那么令人信服的是在持续负载测试中的表现。固态硬盘及其控制器温度过高，导致传输速率下降。虽然这种情况在实际使用中几乎不会察觉，但散热能力在这里肯定达到了极限。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

Sequential Read: 5228MB/s

Sequential Write: 3432MB/s

4K Read: 62.83MB/s

4K Write: 206.5MB/s

4K-64 Read: 646MB/s

4K-64 Write: 2575MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.05ms

Access Time Write: 0.018ms

Score Read: 1232Points

Score Write: 3125Points

Score Total: 4914Points

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	87.1 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	76.4 pt
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	72.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	72.4 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	63.7 pt
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	62.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	49.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3934 (3872.6^min - 3934.05^max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2511 - 5665, n=18)	3832 MB/s -3%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	3312 (3304.27^min - 3312.03^max) MB/s -16%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 4501, n=56, last 2 years)	2937 MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	2759 (2685.61^min - 2758.8^max) MB/s -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	2370 (2363.8^min - 2369.99^max) MB/s -40%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2089 (1958.25^min - 2089.39^max) MB/s -47%
seq write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (1690 - 5181, n=18)	3776 MB/s +7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3772 (213.28^min - 3772.36^max) MB/s +7%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3522 (3235.7^min - 3521.96^max) MB/s
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	3342 (3270.72^min - 3341.6^max) MB/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	3017 (2926.39^min - 3016.59^max) MB/s -14%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 5344, n=56, last 2 years)	2942 MB/s -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	2508 (2487.22^min - 2508^max) MB/s -29%
seq q8 t1 read
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6978 (5832.18^min - 6977.55^max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (6508 - 7177, n=18)	6917 MB/s -1%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	6628 (6115.78^min - 6627.63^max) MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 7155, n=56, last 2 years)	5088 MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	4886 (4359.86^min - 4886.36^max) MB/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	4845 MB/s -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	3662 (2760.48^min - 3662.26^max) MB/s -48%
seq q8 t1 write
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6149 (6105.44^min - 6149.48^max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2382 - 6159, n=18)	5647 MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 6810, n=56, last 2 years)	3998 MB/s -35%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	3965 (3820.5^min - 3965.05^max) MB/s -36%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3881 (113.46^min - 3881.41^max) MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	3398 (2948.41^min - 3398.23^max) MB/s -45%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	3350 (3300.4^min - 3349.78^max) MB/s -46%
4k q1 t1 read
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	74.3 (72.71^min - 74.33^max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (54.3 - 85, n=18)	68.9 MB/s -7%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	67.2 (66.32^min - 67.16^max) MB/s -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	64 (61.48^min - 64.01^max) MB/s -14%
Average of class Subnotebook (8.27 - 87.4, n=56, last 2 years)	61.3 MB/s -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	47.6 (45.01^min - 47.56^max) MB/s -36%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	43.7 (23.85^min - 43.65^max) MB/s -41%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	360 (353.95^min - 359.55^max) MB/s +141%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	261 (241.37^min - 260.67^max) MB/s +75%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (77.7 - 335, n=18)	192.3 MB/s +29%
Average of class Subnotebook (12 - 360, n=56, last 2 years)	160.7 MB/s +8%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	149.4 (143.79^min - 149.44^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	146.4 (142.83^min - 146.41^max) MB/s -2%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	138.9 (137.35^min - 138.92^max) MB/s -7%
4k q32 t16 read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2252 (2223.45^min - 2252.41^max) MB/s +261%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (353 - 5829, n=18)	2082 MB/s +234%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1827 (1766.49^min - 1827.28^max) MB/s +193%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.1 - 4286, n=56, last 2 years)	1291 MB/s +107%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	752 (569.42^min - 752^max) MB/s +21%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	690 (550.07^min - 689.62^max) MB/s +11%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	624 (570.35^min - 624.14^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1681 (635.26^min - 1681.27^max) MB/s +324%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1611 (217.51^min - 1610.59^max) MB/s +307%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (148.5 - 3719, n=18)	1210 MB/s +206%
Average of class Subnotebook (14.2 - 4189, n=56, last 2 years)	891 MB/s +125%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	396 (367.7^min - 396.43^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	392 (315.08^min - 391.78^max) MB/s -1%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	389 (345.44^min - 388.55^max) MB/s -2%

AS SSD
Score Total
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (4390 - 10562, n=18)	6931 Points +41%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	6213 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	5546 Points +13%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4914 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (515 - 8892, n=55, last 2 years)	4367 Points -11%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	4171 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	3582 Points -27%
Score Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2872 Points +133%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	2034 Points +65%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (953 - 3793, n=18)	1997 Points +62%
Average of class Subnotebook (246 - 3307, n=55, last 2 years)	1382 Points +12%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1232 Points
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	1169 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	1034 Points -16%
Score Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2690 - 5157, n=18)	3976 Points +27%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3125 Points
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	2506 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	2496 Points -20%
Average of class Subnotebook (153 - 4469, n=55, last 2 years)	2335 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	2042 Points -35%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1894 Points -39%
Seq Read
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (3522 - 5892, n=18)	5299 MB/s +1%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5228 MB/s
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	4510.61 MB/s -14%
Average of class Subnotebook (448 - 5525, n=55, last 2 years)	3975 MB/s -24%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3934 MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	3912.13 MB/s -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	3043.79 MB/s -42%
Seq Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2489 - 5880, n=18)	3846 MB/s +12%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3432 MB/s
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	3205 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	3194.48 MB/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (99 - 4961, n=55, last 2 years)	2598 MB/s -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	2285.6 MB/s -33%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	2127.08 MB/s -38%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	96.2 MB/s +53%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	71.29 MB/s +13%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (56 - 79.4, n=18)	66.1 MB/s +5%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	62.83 MB/s
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	61.53 MB/s -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (19.8 - 96.2, n=55, last 2 years)	58.6 MB/s -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	55.28 MB/s -12%
4K Write
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	227.17 MB/s +10%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (144.4 - 286, n=18)	220 MB/s +7%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	206.5 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	197.06 MB/s -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	189.9 MB/s -8%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	185.58 MB/s -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 256, n=55, last 2 years)	177.4 MB/s -14%
4K-64 Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	2382 MB/s +269%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1571.21 MB/s +143%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (359 - 3131, n=18)	1401 MB/s +117%
Average of class Subnotebook (181.8 - 2682, n=55, last 2 years)	926 MB/s +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	674.06 MB/s +4%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	656.17 MB/s +2%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	646 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2206 - 4381, n=18)	3371 MB/s +31%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2575 MB/s
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	2107.89 MB/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1949.21 MB/s -24%
Average of class Subnotebook (105.9 - 3905, n=55, last 2 years)	1894 MB/s -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	1616.01 MB/s -37%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	1384 MB/s -46%
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	0.136 ms * -172%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	0.11 ms * -120%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	0.066 ms * -32%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.02 - 0.167, n=55, last 2 years)	0.05771 ms * -15%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	0.055 ms * -10%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.05 ms *
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (0.017 - 0.062, n=18)	0.03817 ms * +24%
Access Time Write
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	0.352 ms * -1856%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.017 - 0.352, n=55, last 2 years)	0.07515 ms * -318%
HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	0.067 ms * -272%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (0.017 - 0.069, n=18)	0.03561 ms * -98%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023	0.03 ms * -67%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.018 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	0.017 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø4533 (3467.43-6971.77)

HP Dragonfly G4 Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB: Ø6464 (5699.22-6570.45)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 : Ø3847 (1643.61-4890.01)

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ: Ø3065 (1919.67-3668.13)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101: Ø4757 (4334.88-4772.28)

图形卡

使用英特尔 Iris Xe 96 EUs显卡，LG Gram Style 14 亚笔记本使用的 iGPU 早在 2020 年就已投入使用。无论是当时还是现在，它都能为播放视频、连接外置 4K 显示器，甚至执行更复杂的任务提供足够的性能。特别是图像处理，甚至偶尔剪切视频也能成功，尽管可能需要更长的时间。

凭借 96 个着色器处理器，它至少能与非常简单的专用显卡相媲美，同时效率极高，不会产生比满载的处理器本身更多的热量（无论如何，它是集成在处理器中的）。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Subnotebook	100 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	73.3 pt
HP Dragonfly G4 ^-1! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U	67.9 pt
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	67.7 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	67 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	64.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	64.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=53, last 2 years)	9600 Points +63%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	6752 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	6568 Points +12%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U	6440 Points +9%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202)	6353 Points +8%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5885 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5877 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=29, last 2 years)	36827 Points +36%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	29086 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	29081 Points +8%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	27042 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13162 - 38578, n=180)	26508 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	23255 Points -14%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=57, last 2 years)	6933 Points +29%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5477 Points +2%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5354 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5315 Points -1%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U	5175 Points -3%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6482, n=215)	4920 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	4136 Points -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (999 - 4501, n=58, last 2 years)	2547 Points +70%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1656 Points +11%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U	1579 Points +6%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1495 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=212)	1495 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1490 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1276 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance		6178 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		19742 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		4784 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1677 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

特别是一些已经过时的游戏，在最低设置下也能玩。但只要提高分辨率或细节级别，帧率就会大幅下降，游戏体验也就所剩无几了。

Gram Style 14 可以让您玩一些要求不高的体育模拟游戏，这些游戏已经在市场上销售了好几年，或者基本上都是经典游戏。

Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	100 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	32.3 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 ^-1! Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.1 pt
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24 pt
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	21.9 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	88 fps +780%
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years)	21.8 fps +118%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.4 fps +64%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.7 (13^min) fps +47%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	13.6 (11^min) fps +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.6 (9^min) fps +26%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10 fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	88.8 (5.76^min, 55.6^P1) fps +730%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=53, last 2 years)	19.3 fps +80%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.5 (6.52^min, 7.87^P1) fps +7%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.7 (3.95^min, 7.94^P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.3 (2.94^min, 6.17^P1) fps -4%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.1 (4.85^min, 6.29^P1) fps -6%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.6 fps +469%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=59, last 2 years)	23.2 fps +58%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	19 fps +29%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.4 fps +12%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.7 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.6 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	13 fps -12%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	152 (47.7^min, 115.1^P1) fps +518%
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=59, last 2 years)	39.9 fps +62%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.7 (6.7^min, 10.1^P1) fps +17%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.7 (5.3^min, 6.86^P1) fps 0%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.6 (5^min, 7^P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.9 (5^min, 7.08^P1) fps -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	21 (5^min, 5^P1) fps -15%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	123.1 (106.4^min) fps +131%
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=61, last 2 years)	62.3 fps +17%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	59.6 (50.1^min) fps +12%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	53.4 (44.6^min) fps
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	53.3 (44.9^min) fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	46.6 (39.3^min) fps -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	45.7 (37.9^min) fps -14%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-5552 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	79.7 fps +154%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.8 fps +30%
Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=55, last 2 years)	34 fps +8%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30.2 fps -4%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	29.1 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.3 fps -10%

The Witcher 3 | Far Cry 5 | F1 23

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (48 - 187, n=48, last 2 years)	118 fps +146%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	100.7 fps +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	90.7 (65^min) fps +89%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (28.9 - 117.2, n=186)	84 fps +75%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	81.4 (63^min) fps +70%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	78.9 (50^min) fps +64%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	48 fps
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (33 - 118, n=36, last 2 years)	70.4 fps +113%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	66 fps +100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	60.9 (58^min) fps +85%
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	54.2 (50^min) fps +64%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (21.4 - 77.8, n=184)	53.6 fps +62%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	50.9 (43^min) fps +54%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33 fps

Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Average of class Subnotebook (37 - 132, n=43, last 2 years)	68.2 fps +84%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	56 (45^min) fps +51%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	54 (45^min) fps +46%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23 - 75, n=92)	46.5 fps +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	41 (29^min) fps +11%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37 (23^min) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Subnotebook (20 - 76, n=44, last 2 years)	40.8 fps +94%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31 (28^min) fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26 (22^min) fps +24%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14 - 39, n=90)	25.5 fps +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24 (17^min) fps +14%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	21 (17^min) fps

F1 23
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Subnotebook (24 - 113.9, n=28, last 2 years)	73.8 fps +208%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (24 - 53.7, n=16)	40.5 fps +69%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24 (18^min, 18^P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Subnotebook (22.4 - 109, n=28, last 2 years)	67.2 fps +200%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (22.4 - 48.6, n=16)	36.6 fps +63%
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22.4 (19^min, 18^P1) fps

我们使用 Witcher 3 进行了持续负载测试， 以评估 LG 子笔记本是否也能在较长时间内提供稳定的计算性能。尽管帧速率在几分钟后从 15 FPS 降至 10 FPS，但在一小时的剩余时间里仍能稳定地保持这一数值。这意味着小风扇能够可靠地冷却组件，但只是在一些明显的节流之后。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø10.3 (7-15)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø16 (15-17)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø13 (9-15)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	113.3	81	21.8	10.7	6.59
The Witcher 3 (2015)	48	33	19	10
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	110	83.9	55.2	53.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	36.5	20.3	14.7		11.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	40.4	35.4	31.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	37	21	21	20	14
Strange Brigade (2018)	80.1	40.2	31.5	24.6	18.5
F1 23 (2023)	24	22.4	15.9	11.7

排放 - 可以保持安静，但不制冷

噪音水平

即使将风扇转速调到最大，也只会发出略微恼人的呼呼声。许多游戏和商务笔记本电脑的噪音是它们的两倍。三星Galaxy Book3 Pro 的 CPU 与 LG Gram Style 14 相同，但机身更薄，声音也比 LG Gram Style 14 大 40%。此外，你还必须认识到，LG Gram 还提供了两个额外的、明显更安静的风扇设置，但只会略微降低系统性能。

此外还有被动模式，在该模式下，我们周围的背景噪声不会超过 22 到 25 分贝。但选择这种模式会导致计算性能大幅下降。虽然笔记本电脑仍然非常好用，但一些更复杂的任务只会进展缓慢。

另一方面，在图书馆或演讲时，你座位上的邻居可能仍然会被触摸板发出的奇怪而响亮的咔嗒声所打扰。也许未来的软件更新仍能在这方面提供一些补救措施。

Noise Level

Idle		25 / 25 / 25 dB(A)
Load		37 / 40.62 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
Noise		9%	-7%	7%	-11%
off / environment *	25	23.3 7%	25.4 -2%	22.9 8%	25.2 -1%
Idle Minimum *	25	23.5 6%	25.4 -2%	23 8%	25.2 -1%
Idle Average *	25	23.5 6%	25.4 -2%	23 8%	25.2 -1%
Idle Maximum *	25	26.8 -7%	29.6 -18%	23 8%	32 -28%
Load Average *	37	27.2 26%	42 -14%	32.8 11%	45.25 -22%
Witcher 3 ultra *	37	32.7 12%		36.9 -0%
Load Maximum *	40.62	35 14%	40.9 -1%	36.9 9%	45.3 -12%

* ... smaller is better

温度

Gram Style 与同类纤薄产品一样，都有微不足道的散热问题。由于空间有限，无法安装大型散热系统，最多只能安装两个并联风扇，而机箱与 CPU 之间的距离又很小，热量必然要通过机箱传到室外。

这就是 LG 笔记本电脑在执行简单任务时已经发热的原因。不过，您仍然可以将笔记本电脑放在膝盖上或柔软的表面上使用，特别是因为 CPU 的热量是沿着显示屏向顶部传递的。这导致中央功能键区域的热点温度超过 45 °C（113 °F）。我们在游戏时也测得了类似的数值。在这种情况下，Gram 当然应该放在桌面上，但至少掌托的温度始终保持在 30 °C（86 °F）以下。

Max. Load

Idle


29.2 °C	29 °C	28.1 °C
28.4 °C	29.1 °C	27.2 °C
25 °C	24.8 °C	24.6 °C

Maximum: 29.2 °C
Average: 27.3 °C


27.4 °C	26.8 °C	27.3 °C
25.5 °C	26.3 °C	26 °C
24.3 °C	24.8 °C	25.1 °C

Maximum: 27.4 °C
Average: 25.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.3 °C | Room Temperature 24.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).

	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat		-5%	-6%	-22%	-5%	-20%	-30%
Maximum Upper Side *	36.3	38.6 -6%	45.1 -24%	46.5 -28%	44 -21%	43.9 -21%	43.9 -21%
Maximum Bottom *	36.8	40.4 -10%	42.5 -15%	44.7 -21%	43.2 -17%	50.7 -38%	50.4 -37%
Idle Upper Side *	29.2	28.2 3%	25.9 11%	34.9 -20%	25.6 12%	30.8 -5%	35.8 -23%
Idle Bottom *	27.4	29 -6%	25.8 6%	32.9 -20%	25.6 7%	31.6 -15%	37.5 -37%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在压力测试期间，除了最高负载下的第一分钟外，温度和最高时钟速度都保持稳定。之后，功耗、CPU 温度和时钟速度都有所下降，但在其余的测试过程中保持稳定。值得注意的是，在满载情况下，从 "无噪音 "模式到 "静音 "模式的变化。虽然处理器温度下降了 10 °C（18 °F），但平均时钟速度却提高了 50%。

总的来说，Gram Style 14 并不是为持续负载而设计的。只有在处理器反复短时加载的情况下，它才能发挥出最佳性能。即使对于要求苛刻的用户来说，这也最接近典型的使用场景。

发言人

尤其是低音和中低音部分的功率不足。虽然立体声扬声器能在较高的频率范围内产生不错的声音，例如声音，但也仅此而已。

你可以用它来听音乐，而不会马上想关掉它。但当你仔细聆听时，很快就会发现缺乏高分辨率录音本应再现的精确度和细节。除此之外，您还可以通过 USB、蓝牙或音频端口连接耳机。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - Gram 可以更加高效

耗电量

i7-1360P 的消费下限为 i7-1360PLG Gram Style 14 的 i7-1360P 低能耗在负载情况下尤为明显。平均功耗为 40 瓦。而采用相同 CPU 的华为 MateBook X Pro 则高出 20 瓦。带 USB-C 接口的 65 瓦充电器足以满足所有情况的需要。

最低负载下的耗电量似乎有点高，许多配置类似的超极本在这方面做得更好。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.6 / 1.2 Watt
Idle	3.58 / 7.125 / 12.1 Watt
Load	40.67 / 64.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5"	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ, IPS, 2160x1350, 13"	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		4%	15%	-13%	13%	-6%	-15%	-7%
Idle Minimum *	3.58	4.1 -15%	2.2 39%	4.1 -15%	3.3 8%	4.2 -17%	5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193) -49%	4.49 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=58, last 2 years) -25%
Idle Average *	7.125	7.5 -5%	10 -40%	6.6 7%	6.5 9%	4.7 34%	8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193) -20%	7.66 ?(2.5 - 16, n=58, last 2 years) -8%
Idle Maximum *	12.1	8.2 32%	10.1 17%	8 34%	7.1 41%	11.4 6%	10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193) 11%	9.56 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=58, last 2 years) 21%
Load Average *	40.67	35.5 13%	33.6 17%	61 -50%	40.7 -0%	61.5 -51%	45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193) -11%	46.6 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=56, last 2 years) -15%
Load Maximum *	64.2	66.5 -4%	37.2 42%	90 -40%	58.6 9%	64 -0%	67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193) -5%	68.6 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=58, last 2 years) -7%
Witcher 3 ultra *		37.5	27.8	56	37	55.1

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø55.1 (46.8-63.3)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø41.2 (15.9-64.2)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø63.6 (63.1-63.8)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.02 (4.3-7.3)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.41 (3.86-8.94)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø37.4 (14.4-64.2)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø50.6 (39.4-63.3)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø60.3 (55.3-63.2)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø29.9 (10.8-56.6)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø36.7 (12.6-59.8)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø39 (28.7-53.2)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø43.5 (35.3-60.5)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø25.5 (19.6-37.9)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø46.5 (41.7-62.1)

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.71 (7.14-10.5)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.51 (4.43-10.8)

电池寿命

由于闲置时的功耗略高，电池续航时间并没有我们对 72 瓦时大容量电池的预期那么好。但在我们的视频测试中，续航时间达到了 10 小时，在不同需求的网站上冲浪也超过了 11 小时，这在实际使用中还是很不错的。这意味着，您可以在路上轻松使用 Gram Style 14 整天，而无需寻找插座。

与此同时，例如惠普蜻蜓 G4的电池容量稍小，CPU 性能稍弱，但运行时间却比它长 4 个小时。如果调整得当，LG 笔记本电脑本可以获得第一名，但却错失良机。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		11h 40min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		8h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 25min

	LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh	HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 49.5 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		34%	48%	-15%	-34%	-11%	11%
H.264	603		1005 67%	527 -13%		712 18%	896 ?(527 - 1251, n=26, last 2 years) 49%
WiFi v1.3	700	954 36%	993 42%	580 -17%	465 -34%	528 -25%	719 ?(389 - 1585, n=59, last 2 years) 3%
Load	145	192 32%	197 36%	124 -14%		109 -25%	116.6 ?(57 - 197, n=46, last 2 years) -20%

Pros

+ 快速处理器

+ 3K OLED 显示屏

+ 2x 雷电 4

+ 超轻

+ 电池寿命长

+ 被动模式

+ 良好的键盘

Cons

- 温度很高

- 触摸板的反馈令人恼火

- 机壳底部和显示屏盖子相当软

- 价格相对较高

评价 - 安静、优雅、轻便

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS 拥有快速的处理器、非常出色的键盘（尤其是对于超极本而言）、清晰的 OLED 显示屏以及不到 1 千克（约 2.2 磅）的重量，几乎是在旅途中完成工作的完美设备。即使 i7-1360P 的 12 个核心与竞争对手相比有所减弱，但仍能为要求苛刻的任务提供足够的计算性能。

此外，我们还喜欢风扇的设置。风扇转速较低时，系统性能保持较高水平，而噪音则在可察觉的极限范围内。只有在切换到静音模式时，你才会注意到笔记本电脑之前的声音仍然清晰可闻。Gram Style 在完全静音的情况下，仍能顺利处理日常任务--如果不是触控板被设置为产生无法避免的（过于响亮的）反馈 "咔嗒 "声的话。

如果把重点放在移动性和外观上，LG Gram Style 14 完全令人信服。

考虑到技术基础，电池续航时间似乎太短了，但超过 10 小时的续航时间还是相当可观的。我们测试机的存储设备也显得有些夸张。几乎没有任何使用场景需要超过 16GB 的内存。并行安装的两个固态硬盘也只有在某些非常特殊的情况下才需要，因为在大多数情况下，将重要文件存储在云端几乎总是更方便。

几乎没有同类产品能像 Gram Style 14 一样安静、轻巧、功能强大。只有 Apple MacBook Air 15 2023在被动模式下性能更快，但它没有 Windows 系统。惠普惠普蜻蜓 G4电池续航时间更长，但重量也更轻。如果你需要完整的处理器性能，三星三星Galaxy Book3 Pro 14也是一个不错的选择。不过，在我们的测试中，它的风扇很明显。

价格和供应情况

我们测试的 LG Gram Style 14Z90RS 目前在美国亚马逊有售，售价 1797 美元。规格稍低的版本也可从LG 购买，售价约为 1400 美元。.

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG - 08/29/2023 v7 ^(old)
Mario Petzold

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

88%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

65 / 75 → 86%

Weight

75 / 20-75 → 100%

Battery

87%

Display

91%

Games Performance

55 / 78 → 70%

Application Performance

89 / 85 → 100%

Temperature

94%

Noise

94%

Audio

81 / 91 → 89%

Camera

48 / 85 → 56%

Average

80%

90%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 455490 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > LG Gram Style 14 笔记本电脑评测：优雅、快速、（太）热

Mario Petzold, 2023-08-31 (Update: 2023-08-31)

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例 - 色彩丰富，结构薄弱

尺寸比较

设备 - 基本连接基本足够

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

维护

保修、配件和包装

输入设备 - 漂亮但不一定实用的 Gram 风格

显示屏 - OLED，色彩还原度高

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 即使在省电模式下，i7-1360P 也能保持强劲性能

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储解决方案

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放 - 可以保持安静，但不制冷

噪音水平

温度

压力测试

发言人

LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

电源管理 - Gram 可以更加高效

耗电量

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption With External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评价 - 安静、优雅、轻便

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison