华为MateBook X Pro 2023回顾--MacBook Air的竞争对手也支持外部GPU
MateBook X Pro 2023紧随MateBook X Pro 2022的大脚步。MateBook X Pro 2022的大脚步,去年完全更新。今年,只有最新的英特尔SoC的形式有一个小的升级。在我们的测试样本中,我们看到 英特尔酷睿i7-1360P这属于猛禽湖P系列。显示屏仍然是一个非常明亮的14.2英寸IPS面板,连接功能有大量的USB-C端口。还包括Thunderbolt,所以我们将利用这个机会看一下使用外部GPU的性能。
在价格方面,MateBook X Pro 2023在我们的配置中与它的前辈处于同一水平,这意味着你必须支付2199欧元。这并不便宜,因为2022型号目前的价格是1850欧元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 | |
92 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 | |
89.2 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | HP EliteBook 835 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M | 1.3 kg | 19.2 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 11.8 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
MateBook X Pro 2023的基本单元与2022型号相同。使用了高质量的材料,如镁,并以低重量提供良好的稳定性。所有表面都提供了柔软的触感,这对实践中的触觉质量有非常积极的影响。MateBook X Pro 2023也有熟悉的深蓝色(墨水蓝)。目前在制造商的官方网站上还有一个白色的替代选项。是否还会有太空灰版本,还有待观察。
由于材料的选择,整个箱子看起来非常高质量,而且非常稳定。底座装置在上部,和中间的键盘区域略微有一点屈服。然而,这并不是很明显,在日常使用中几乎不会造成困扰。显示屏盖也很稳定,并得益于高质量的材料,在所有区域都有出色的制造。听不到任何裂缝的声音。在日常使用中,你不得不忍受所安装的显示器铰链的轻微摇晃。尽管如此,显示屏支架给人留下了非常高质量的印象,因此与MateBook X Pro 2023的整体外观相匹配。
装备
MateBook X Pro 2023左边有两个支持雷电4的USB-C接口,右边还有两个USB-C接口。还包括一条短的USB-A转接线。然而,一个带有RJ45插口的适配器也是一个有用的补充。2023年的MateBook X Pro还支持所谓的超级设备功能,允许使用华为设备(如平板电脑、智能手机、显示器)在彼此之间轻松移动内容。
沟通
MateBook X Pro 2023提供了最新的通信模块Intel AX211,因此也可以使用6GHz频段(Wi-Fi 6E)。还提供了蓝牙5.2,可以无线连接其他配件。我们能够用我们的测试路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000连接到6GHz网络,没有任何问题。然而,数据速率可以提高,因为MateBook X Pro 2023在5GHz网络中无法跟上其对手。我们建议主要使用较新的6GHz网络进行Wi-Fi连接。这里的数据率看起来要好得多。
维护
在MateBook X Pro 2023中,没有为终端用户提供维护选项,在我们看来这是一个不必要的限制。由于它是制造商的测试设备,打开它时不能排除划痕,我们避免完全拆除盖子。拧开Torx螺丝(T5)后,盖子不能被拆下。看起来,在较新的机型中,后部橡胶脚下可能还隐藏着两颗螺丝。我们没有成功地卸下橡胶脚,因为它们极其紧密地粘在底部。
输入设备
键盘
我们已经知道MateBook X Pro 2022的键盘,因此MateBook X Pro 2023也提供了一个优秀的键盘,可以容纳频繁打字的人。只有1.5毫米的低键落差伴随着轻微的静音行程。然而,由于明显的压力点,这不能被归类为海绵状。两段式白色背光在黑暗环境中很有帮助,但必须手动激活。电源按钮没有集成到键盘上,因此不会进一步干扰。它还包括一个指纹扫描仪,工作可靠。
触摸板
触摸板有许多有用的功能,直接采用了MateBook X Pro 2022的功能。因此,触摸板是MateBook X Pro 2023的亮点之一,使其在竞争中脱颖而出。华为在FreeTouch
这个名字下联合了几个功能,这是额外的手势。例如,你可以沿着两个垂直边缘滚动来改变屏幕亮度或音量,这也得到触觉网格效果的支持。沿着顶部边缘滚动还可以让你快进视频或音乐。还有其他手势,在下面的截图中显示。
触摸板的正常使用效果也很好。就像在Apple ,触摸伴随着触觉反馈,有非常均匀和安静的点击声。触摸板本身被牢固地安装在底座上。
显示器 - 高像素密度,90赫兹
MateBook X Pro 2023有一个14.2英寸的IPS显示屏,刷新率为90 Hz。3220 x 2080像素的高分辨率提供了264 PPI的高像素密度。电容式触摸屏在测试中令人信服,主观上给人留下了极好的印象。在我们的测量中,工厂指定的500cd/m²的亮度很容易就被超越了。平均而言,我们注意到550cd/m²的亮度,在峰值时几乎为600cd/m²。再加上黑值(0.25),这导致了出色的对比度(2380:1)。这对IPS面板来说几乎是完美的,尽管OLED在这里可以提供更好的比率。色彩再现方面也没有负面的批评,由于像素密度非常高,画面非常清晰。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 571 cd/m²
Contrast: 2380:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.22
ΔE Greyscale 2.74 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 SDC417B, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | HP EliteBook 835 G9 InfoVision X133NV4M R0, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 9% | -11% | -11% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 89.8 | 94.6 5% | 99.7 11% | 71.8 -20% | 70.7 -21% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.5 0% | 100 1% | 99.2 0% | 100 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.2 | 86.5 3% | 96.9 15% | 73.1 -13% | 72.1 -14% |
Response Times | -86% | 22% | -193% | -157% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 20 ? | 25.4 ? -27% | 2 ? 90% | 43.2 ? -116% | 37.7 ? -89% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7 ? | 17.1 ? -144% | 1.6 ? 77% | 25.9 ? -270% | 22.7 ? -224% |
PWM Frequency | 156000 ? | 240 ? -100% | |||
Screen | 9% | 18% | -39% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 595 | 603 1% | 361 -39% | 386 -35% | 928 56% |
Brightness | 550 | 586 7% | 365 -34% | 366 -33% | 828 51% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 91 7% | 98 15% | 91 7% | 65 -24% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.39 -56% | 0.26 -4% | 0.35 -40% | |
Contrast | 2380 | 1546 -35% | 1485 -38% | 2651 11% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.01 | 1.1 45% | 1.2 40% | 3.8 -89% | 1.76 12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.9 | 2.2 68% | 1.9 72% | 9.1 -32% | 3.94 43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.22 | 1.2 2% | 1.2 2% | 1.09 11% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.74 | 1.5 45% | 1.2 56% | 6.2 -126% | 2.4 12% |
Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.17 101% | 2.27 97% | 2.09 105% | 2.324 95% |
CCT | 6319 103% | 6549 99% | 6486 100% | 6618 98% | 6689 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-6% | 16% /
17% | -81% /
-55% | -51% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
从主观上讲,所安装的屏幕的显示质量是非常好的。总之,在交付状态下,测量的DeltaE-2000颜色值已经处于良好水平,这表明华为提供了一个预先校准的显示屏。然而,竞争对手在这一领域也非常强大,甚至得分更高一些。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 156000 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 156000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 156000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
光滑的触摸屏在户外会引起许多反射,这限制了它的使用。然而,由于显示屏很亮,在晴天可以找到位置,仍然能够在户外工作。这里最好是阴凉处。
安装的IPS面板提供了良好的可视角度,你可以从图片中看到。
性能--现在以英特尔猛禽湖SoC为基础
凭借英特尔酷睿i7-1360P,MateBook X Pro 2023获得了英特尔的最新处理器。内存也与时俱进,使用DDR5内存。然而,这被限制在16GB。大容量存储有一个1TB的SSD。华为网站上目前没有提到MateBook X Pro 2023的不同配置。
测试条件
与2022年的MateBook X Pro一样,预装的PC管理器提供两种性能模式,默认使用平衡
模式。另外,也可以选择性能
模式。然而,这只在主电源操作中可用。特别重要的是,这种模式只有在电池电量超过20%时才能激活,即使是在插入电源适配器的情况下。处理器的TDP值列在下表中。我们用性能
模式进行了基准测试和测量。其中,在我们的测试中还使用了能源配置文件节能模式
和平衡
模式的排放率。
模式 | CPU负载 |
---|---|
平衡 | 64瓦->25瓦 |
功率 | 64瓦 -> 30瓦 |
处理器
MateBook X Pro 2023容纳了 酷睿i7-1360P- 英特尔最先进的移动使用的SoC,它也提供了甚至比英特尔酷睿i7-1260P的性能。这两款处理器非常相似,较新的芯片只有更高的基础时钟不同。这现在增加到1.6 GHz,在Boost中可能达到5.0 GHz。我们的测试样本在这里可以获得八个百分点的领先优势。尽管如此,MateBook X Pro 2023不得不屈居第二,因为当我们看CPU性能评级时,联想的Yoga Pro 7还是要好一点。
在永久性负载下,我们看到处理器的最大性能只在短时间内达到。根据选择的配置文件,我们在Cinebench R15多循环中看到平均25或33瓦。由于温度的原因,SoC不得不一次又一次地稍微放慢速度。
对于进一步的比较和基准测试,我们参考我们的CPU比较表.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU -5! | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (6390 - 12637, n=16) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1596 - 1909, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (2474 - 4887, n=16) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (611 - 736, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1079 - 2214, n=16) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (180 - 271, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (268 - 496, n=17) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (26534 - 52959, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (4647 - 5973, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (7549 - 10817, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1435 - 1871, n=17) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (6.9 - 14.2, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (40.3 - 57.2, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (0.445 - 0.583, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (5610 - 11188, n=17) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (29251 - 56942, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1444 - 2728, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (65324 - 89266, n=16) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (4370 - 7269, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (14104 - 28019, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (30391 - 99244, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (420 - 807, n=16) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (2906 - 5957, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (29108 - 49328, n=16) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 |
系统性能
MateBook X Pro 2023的主观性能印象很好,尽管我们的测试样本只是在中场。在这一点上应该提到,在实践中你几乎注意不到现代设备的性能差异。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5360 - 6281, n=14) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9883 - 12059, n=14) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6572 - 8161, n=14) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5723 - 7612, n=14) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1527 - 1891, n=15) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1503 - 1842, n=15) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1558 - 2003, n=15) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1311 - 1899, n=15) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
PCMark 10 Score | 5672 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (44299 - 72748, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (44751 - 68945, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (45887 - 93331, n=16) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (85 - 110.5, n=16) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
LatencyMon已经显示我们在Edge中打开几个标签时延迟增加,在播放我们的4K测试视频时没有进一步恶化。iGPU的利用率约为40%。只有在我们启动Prime95之后,延迟才会急剧上升。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
华为为MateBook X Pro 2023提供了一个PCIe 3.0 x4固态硬盘,存储容量为1TB,制造商没有说明。第一次使用后仍有约885GB可用。与2022型号一样,制造商将SSD分为两个分区。因此,系统驱动器的容量略低于200GB,而D驱动器上约有735GB可用于其他数据。这种划分比前一年的机型更有意义,因为在前一年,系统驱动器只有120GB的存储空间。扣除Windows安装后,现在大约有120GB可用。
当海量存储处于永久负载状态时,在速度方面也有限制。根据HWiNFO的数据,我们看到温度为79℃,这导致性能周期性下降。然而,在日常使用中,在我们有许多安装的正常测试程序中,我们无法确定任何明显的限制。
关于进一步的比较和基准,我们可以参考我们的比较表,这里是 。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
这里的显卡是著名的Iris Xe Graphics G7iGPU,是英特尔的快速版本,有96个EUs。该iGPU可以满足正常的日常使用,并提供足够的性能。此外,该图形适配器还能应对高分辨率视频的播放,没有任何问题。
在合成基准测试中,iGPU受益于工作存储器的双通道配置,因此取得了良好的速率。然而,与MateBook X Pro 2022相比,我们没有看到性能的提高。与AMD目前的Radeon 680M iGPU 相比,英特尔iGPU显然处于劣势。更多的GPU基准测试可在这里获得移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 。
英特尔Iris Xe图形G7
3DMark 05 Standard | 40987 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 31307 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 28283 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7524 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 94998 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24009 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5240 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2558 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1874 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
内置的iGPU并不是一个好的游戏解决方案,尽管性能比 MateBook X Pro 2022.我们在目前的游戏中只实现了低分辨率和低细节的可玩帧数。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=53, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
Far Cry New Dawn | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (29 - 69, n=19) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (16 - 38, n=19) | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (15 - 36, n=19) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14 - 33, n=17) |
Borderlands 3 | |
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (58 - 66.8, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (33.9 - 67.2, n=20) | |
1920x1080 Medium Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (27.8 - 34, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (15.8 - 30.9, n=20) | |
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (17 - 22, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 18.9, n=20) | |
1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (12.7 - 15, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7.97 - 14, n=17) |
F1 2020 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (98.8 - 140.4, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (49 - 109.6, n=34) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AF:16x | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (51.9 - 67, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23.1 - 57.5, n=34) | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (40.4 - 52.7, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (22 - 44.4, n=32) | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (26.4 - 36, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (15 - 28, n=31) |
Far Cry 6 | |
1280x720 Low Graphics Quality | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (45.8 - 48.7, n=2) | |
1920x1080 Medium Graphics Quality AA:SM | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23.9 - 28, n=3) | |
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality AA:T | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (20.3 - 22.9, n=3) |
GRID Legends | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (44.9 - 109.1, n=9) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (29.8 - 58.4, n=11) | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (22.5 - 47.7, n=10) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (15.5 - 33.2, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (40.7 - 172.1, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (25.9 - 67.3, n=31) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16.5 - 62.1, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (17 - 40.1, n=29) | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10.2 - 41.2, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.6 - 24.1, n=28) | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
HP EliteBook 835 G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.9 - 34.1, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.4 - 18.4, n=25) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 135.2 | 114.9 | 27.4 | 11.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 100.7 | 66 | 35.7 | 16.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 113.7 | 84.5 | 66.6 | 59.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 48 | 26.2 | 19 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 60.1 | 46.3 | 40.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 56 | 31 | 29 | 27 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 103 | 44.8 | 35.5 | 28.7 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 45.9 | 27.6 | 25.9 | 22.4 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 51 | 31 | 29 | 26 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 44.6 | 21.5 | 15.6 | 12.4 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 58 | 27.8 | 17 | 12.7 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 98.8 | 51.9 | 40.4 | 26.4 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 117.4 | 57.8 | 45.2 | 31.4 |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 48.7 | 28 | 22.9 | |
GRID Legends (2022) | 61.3 | 51.4 | 40.9 | 25.1 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 32.9 | 25.4 | 16.9 | 13.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 50.6 | 47.3 | 33.6 | 26.4 |
通过eGPU底座与NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti的3D性能
正如评论中早些时候暗示的那样,我们与MateBook X Pro 2023和Razer Core X一起进行了额外的合成基准测试和游戏测试,我们的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti安装。通过Thunderbolt的相应配件,3D性能可以明显提高。我们用我们的一些迷你PC作为直接比较。它们也配备了笔记本电脑技术,并采用了当前的英特尔或AMD SoC。结果,我们看到对比设备之间的结果几乎相同。
基本上,我们可以说,通过这种配置,3D性能可以得到很好的提高。因此,大量的游戏可以在高分辨率和最大细节下顺利进行。然而,与eGPU底座一起使用的专用显卡的性能被节制在PCI Express 3.0速度的4通道。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Unigine Superposition | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
F1 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
F1 2021 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11) | |
Intel NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSKi7 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician TK11-A0 + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 175 | 170.5 | 156.5 | 94.5 | 86.3 | 103.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 302.5 | 208.5 | 152 | 75.1 | 71.9 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 156.2 | 140 | 135.6 | 121.4 | 104.3 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 160.8 | 134.7 | 96.2 | 76.1 | 48.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 118.6 | 104.6 | 88.5 | 76.9 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 141 | 123 | 120 | 112 | 97 | 59 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 200 | 151.6 | 150.8 | 148.1 | 127.4 | 83.9 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 141.4 | 98.3 | 95.6 | 89.6 | 73.6 | 49.2 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 122 | 106 | 102 | 92 | 87 | 60 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 133.4 | 89.4 | 67.7 | 51.3 | 45 | 33.5 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 139.7 | 120.9 | 97.7 | 82.9 | 64.3 | 38.1 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 182 | 119.5 | 118.2 | 101.5 | 87.6 | 60.9 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 137.3 | 106.9 | 69.8 | 50.5 | 48.8 | 41.2 |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 73.7 | 62.3 | 51.8 | 45.3 | 43.9 | |
God of War (2022) | 108.2 | 96.1 | 80.1 | 60.2 | 53.2 | 39.4 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 115.1 | 99.2 | 83.1 | 70.7 | 64.3 | 51.1 |
F1 22 (2022) | 60.2 | 54.8 | 43.1 | 27.3 | 26.7 | 18.9 |
排放
噪声排放
安装的冷却系统由两个风扇组成,蒸气室装置提供了良好的冷却性能,使设备能够相对安静地运行。空转时,MateBook X Pro 2023甚至可以部分静音运行,尽管在平均负载期间达到42 dB(A)。在压力测试期间,噪音水平下降到40.9 dB(A),这与持续负载下的低耗电有关。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.4 / 25.4 / 29.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 42 / 40.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.4 dB(A) |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP EliteBook 835 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | 10% | 10% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 25.4 | 23.5 7% | 23.3 8% | 24.2 5% | 26 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.4 | 23.5 7% | 23.3 8% | 24.2 5% | 26 -2% |
Idle Average * | 25.4 | 23.5 7% | 23.3 8% | 24.2 5% | 27 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 25.9 12% | 23.3 21% | 24.2 18% | 28 5% |
Load Average * | 42 | 33.8 20% | 37.7 10% | 36.2 14% | 35 17% |
Load Maximum * | 40.9 | 40.6 1% | 40.1 2% | 36.2 11% | 37 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.4 | 40.1 | 42.7 | 37 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度对MateBook X Pro来说不是一个问题。然而,即使在空转和执行轻度任务时,机箱的温度也比平时高,但我们认为这不是一个问题。
在压力测试中,我们看到与只测试CPU时相同的行为。启动后不久,允许SoC使用64瓦特,然后在永久负载下保持在30瓦特。然而,CPU/iGPU的时钟速率总体上可以保持相当稳定。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.9 °C / -5.3 F).
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M | HP EliteBook 835 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 14% | 10% | 11% | 15% | 12% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 46.5 | 44.7 4% | 43.1 7% | 43.1 7% | 39.2 16% | 46 1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.7 | 44.6 -0% | 42 6% | 45 -1% | 49.8 -11% | 49 -10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34.9 | 25.1 28% | 29.4 16% | 27.3 22% | 24.2 31% | 24 31% |
Idle Bottom * | 32.9 | 25.3 23% | 29.4 11% | 27.8 16% | 25.1 24% | 24 27% |
* ... smaller is better
演讲者
MateBook X Pro 2023提供了一个伟大的音响系统,通过6个扬声器实现出色的声音。从主观上讲,这是很宽敞和强大的。高达94 dB(A)的良好的最大音量也是不容小觑的。与两个淡出的竞争者相比,我们的MateBook X Pro 2023在这里的得分略高。在大多数情况下,你可以不使用外部扬声器。
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
消耗功率
新的MateBook X Pro 2023在闲置时需要的能量比前一年的型号少得多,尽管这里使用的是相同的显示屏。制造商显然可以改善这一点。我们测量到没有负载时只有4.1到8瓦。我们在仪表上看到最大功率为90瓦,这正是附带的电源所能提供的。最大消耗只出现在很短的时间内。平均而言,MateBook X Pro 2023只消耗56瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.15 / 1 Watt |
Idle | 4.1 / 6.6 / 8 Watt |
Load |
61 / 90 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | HP EliteBook 835 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 23% | -43% | 8% | -5% | 7% | -9% | 0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 1.9 54% | 6.5 -59% | 5.8 -41% | 4.1 -0% | 5 -22% | 5.34 ? -30% | 4.49 ? -10% |
Idle Average * | 6.6 | 9.6 -45% | 13.7 -108% | 8.5 -29% | 7.7 -17% | 6 9% | 8.55 ? -30% | 7.66 ? -16% |
Idle Maximum * | 8 | 9.7 -21% | 14.4 -80% | 8.8 -10% | 7.9 1% | 11 -38% | 10.8 ? -35% | 9.56 ? -20% |
Load Average * | 61 | 32.4 47% | 64.6 -6% | 35.1 42% | 66.2 -9% | 45 26% | 45.3 ? 26% | 46.6 ? 24% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 56 | 30.8 45% | 57.2 -2% | 27.6 51% | 61.5 -10% | 45.2 19% | ||
Load Maximum * | 90 | 35.7 60% | 90.9 -1% | 59.5 34% | 84.3 6% | 48 47% | 67.5 ? 25% | 68.6 ? 24% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
与MateBook X Pro 2022相比,2023型号的能量平衡更好,也确保了更好的电池运行时间。在我们的WLAN测试中,60Wh的电池可以为设备提供9.5小时的良好能量。显示屏亮度降低了四个等级,相当于150cd/m²。即使是长时间的电影之夜也没有问题,因为MateBook X Pro 2023在这里也能持续近9小时,表现出色。然而,值得一提的是,电池运行时间随着最大显示亮度而明显减少。在WLAN测试中,运行时间减少了约4小时。
该设备的充电速度相对较快。在设备开启的情况下,充满电只需要95分钟,而在不到一半的时间后就已经超过了80%。
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, 73 Wh | HP EliteBook 835 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 51 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 66% | -18% | 31% | 25% | -6% | 31% | |
Reader / Idle | 1292 | 1113 -14% | 1750 ? 35% | ||||
H.264 | 527 | 946 80% | 455 -14% | 829 57% | 903 71% | 760 44% | 896 ? 70% |
WiFi v1.3 | 580 | 884 52% | 451 -22% | 678 17% | 783 35% | 547 -6% | 719 ? 24% |
Load | 124 | 100 -19% | 146 18% | 86 -31% | 65 -48% | 116.6 ? -6% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - MateBook X Pro有改进,几乎没有任何弱点
通过MateBook X Pro 2023,制造商今年乍一看是在做纯粹的产品维护,因为只使用了一个新的处理器。该 英特尔酷睿i7-1360P同时,当我们纯粹关注CPU的基准测试时,它提供了一个略微更好的性能。这两种不同的性能模式在实践中并不明显,尽管性能差异是可以衡量的。它在音量方面尤其明显。你可以自信地在这里使用平衡模式。你几乎不会失去任何性能,并得到一个在日常使用中非常安静地工作的设备。
此外,制造商仍然忠实于自己,没有改变90赫兹的显示屏。它有很高的分辨率,也能处理触摸输入。亮度超过了工厂规格,工厂校准确保了低DeltaE-2000值,这使得该显示器适合半专业领域。这里当然有改进的余地,可以采用OLED面板和120或144赫兹的选项。这里安装的90赫兹的显示屏对于日常使用来说是一个很好的折衷方案。
MateBook X Pro 2023是一款非常高质量的副笔记本,具有良好的系统性能,出色的扬声器,以及优秀的IPS显示屏,使其成为目前最好的Windows超极本之一。
华为在设备上也没有妥协,仍然安装了两个成熟的Thunderbolt 4端口,由两个额外的USB-C接口支持。因此,缺少一个Type-A USB端口只能通过适配器解决方案来抵消。与其他华为设备(如智能手机或平板电脑)的互动,将使许多用户感到高兴。制造商在输入设备方面也做得很好。键盘使用起来很舒服,适合经常打字的人,触摸板也是一个很好的鼠标替代品,有许多有用的功能,使日常使用更容易。
笔记本MacBook Air M2仍然是最大的竞争者之一,因为由于采用了M2芯片,它的效率更高,而且由于采用了被动冷却技术,所以很安静。另外, 联想Yoga Pro 7也是一个重要的竞争者,它有一个基于AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS的更强大的iGPU。Yoga Pro 7还提供一个现代的USB 4端口,适合连接外部GPU。
价格和可用性
新的MateBook X Pro 2023现在可以在华为的网上商店购买,价格为2199欧元。.此外,Notebooksbilliger.de和Cyberport以同样的价格提供MateBook X Pro 2023。
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
- 06/14/2023 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.