Notebookcheck Logo

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2回顾：日常使用的MacBook现在有了15英寸

越大越好吗？

花了很长时间，但Apple ，终于创造了一个更大的MacBook Air。然而，除了更大的显示屏，与它较小的兄弟姐妹MacBook Air 13相比，没有重大变化，包括去年的M2 SoC。
Apple ARM Ultrabook MacBook

Apple 笔记本电脑公司终于推出了大型MacBook Air，从而填补了其产品组合中的一个巨大空白，因为以前想要大型MacBook的人都不得不选择MacBook Pro 16。这提供了很多性能，但许多用户根本不需要它，而且最重要的是，MBP 16相对来说比较笨重和昂贵。随着新的MacBook Air 15的推出， ，现在提供了一个适合日常使用的较大的MacBook，从技术上讲，它几乎是较小的MacBook Air 13的完美复制。这基本上意味着你必须不使用新的处理器，而获得去年熟悉的M2 SoC，它又是被动冷却的。显示器当然更大，为15.3英寸，但规格保持不变，即没有HDR支持或ProMotion（120赫兹）。

Apple

起步价为1299美元，与较小的13英寸机型相比，Air 15只提供更快的M2 SoC，提供10个GPU内核。然而，其余的规格令人唏嘘，因为只有8GB的内存和256GB的小型SSD。第二个基本型号提供512GB的固态硬盘存储，但价格高出200美元，为1499.00美元。今天的测试设备配备了1TB固态硬盘和16GB内存，总价为2289欧元（约2500美元）。在接下来的几天里，我们还将仔细研究带有8GB和256GB SSD的基本型号。

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB (MacBook Air 15 2023 Series)
Processor
Apple M2 8 x 2.4 - 3.5 GHz, 20 W PL2 / Short Burst, 9 W PL1 / Sustained
Graphics adapter
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 13.5 W TDP
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5-6400, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
15.30 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1864 pixel 224 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
Apple SSD AP1024Z, 1024 GB 
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 11.5 x 340.4 x 237.6
Battery
66.5 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Six-speaker system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.516 kg, Power Supply: 186 g
Price
2289 Euro
Links
Apple homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
91.8 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2, M2 10-Core GPU		1.5 kg11.5 mm15.30"2880x1864
84.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.6 kg14.7 mm15.00"2496x1664
85.9 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
LG Gram 15Z90Q
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs		1.1 kg17.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
R7 6800H, Radeon 680M		1.9 kg18.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
92 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2, M2 10-Core GPU		1.2 kg11.3 mm13.60"2560x1664

外壳 - 一个更大的MacBook Air

Apple 保持了小号的设计。MacBook Air 13在其15英寸机型上保持不变；只是占地面积稍大。然后，整体高度实际上是相同的，为11.5毫米，由于更大的外壳，新的MBA 15看起来甚至比它的小兄弟姐妹更薄。稳定性非常好，底座和显示屏盖子都不会以任何方式变形。最大打开角度和往常一样，大约是130度。

显示屏的边缘相对较窄，尽管有些Windows设备的边缘甚至更薄。当然，上部区域的网络摄像头的凹槽仍然很明显，这没有任何缺点，至少在功能上没有。然而，我们仍然认为它看起来不是特别好，但这自然是一个品味问题。底座单元的前缘相当尖锐，但由于底座本身很薄，这不会割伤手腕。

从质量上看，MacBook Air没有留下批评的余地。做工非常完美，金属外壳给人的感觉非常高端。四种可用颜色中的三种（银色、太空灰 和星光）总体上非常耐脏和耐指纹。另一方面，"午夜 "色的变体（深蓝色）在开箱后看起来不错，但之后需要不断地进行清洁。

普通的MacBook Air 13本身并不轻，而较大的Air 15的金属机身在这里也要付出代价。它的重量略高于1.5公斤，第一次握住时感觉出奇地重。这款 LG Gram 15(约1.1公斤)相比之下是一个真正的轻量级，而 表面笔记本电脑5既轻一点又厚一点。35瓦的双USB-C电源非常紧凑，重量为186克，包括MagSafe电缆。

尺寸比较

❌
359 mm 233 mm 18.8 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 223 mm 17.4 mm 1.1 kg355.7 mm 248.1 mm 16.8 mm 2.2 kg340 mm 244 mm 14.7 mm 1.6 kg340.4 mm 237.6 mm 11.5 mm 1.5 kg312.6 mm 221.2 mm 15.5 mm 1.6 kg304.1 mm 215 mm 11.3 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - MagSafe和USB 4.0

有两个USB-C端口（雷电3，USB4.0）以及左侧的MagSafe和一个3.5毫米插孔，端口分布与较小的型号相同。因此，Apple ，这里没有投入任何额外的工作，使机箱上的额外空间没有得到利用。右侧的另一个USB-C端口，也许还有一个SD读卡器（就像在专业机型中一样），那就更好了。此外，只有一个外部显示器可以连接到较大的MacBook Air（最大6K @60 Hz）。

左边：MagSafe，2个USB-C 4.0（Thunderbolt 3，DisplayPort ALT模式，Power Delivery）。
左边：MagSafe，2个USB-C 4.0（Thunderbolt 3，DisplayPort ALT模式，Power Delivery）。
右：3.5毫米音频
右：3.5毫米音频

沟通

Wi-Fi模块也与小型的MacBook Air M2而不是专业机型。Wi-Fi 6只支持80MHz的频率，这将传输速率限制在900Mbps左右。使用我们的华硕参考路由器，传输速率达到了预期水平，在日常使用中没有任何限制，但对于一款高端笔记本来说，它仍然不大符合要求。MacBook Air还支持蓝牙5.3。

Networking
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
920 (min: 862) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
858 (min: 810) MBit/s ∼52%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1649 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1587) MBit/s ∼99%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1514 (min: 739) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1640 (min: 1605) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
MediaTek MT7921
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
720 (min: 674) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
709 (min: 702) MBit/s ∼43%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AX12
772 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
760 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
766 (min: 698) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
874 (min: 522) MBit/s ∼53%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1777 (min: 1685) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1741 (min: 1650) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø920 (862-953)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø858 (810-880)

网络摄像头

MacBooks上仍然没有Face ID，但1080p的网络摄像头提供了良好的质量，也适合视频通话。麦克风的情况也是如此。

ColorChecker
21 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
13 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB: 12.45 ∆E min: 3.94 - max: 23.81 ∆E

维护

底部的盖子是用几颗五角螺丝固定的，但中间还有一些固定夹。在这里，你必须使用一些力量（最好是一个吸盘）来松开夹子，之后可以将盖子向前拉。内部结构（以电池为主）看起来也不错，但用户在这里无能为力。在紧急情况下，可以更换部件，如电池（用螺丝和几个拉片固定）。

内部结构
内部结构
底盖
底盖
固定夹子
固定夹子

输入设备 - 巨大的触控板

输入设备也被照搬过来，没有改变。黑色键盘的水平很好，普通的剪刀键也很好打，但无疑还有更好的键盘，特别是在商业领域。额外的宽度既没有用来做数字键盘，也没有用来做扬声器盖--只是增加了外壳表面。Apple 多年来一直是白色键盘照明的领导者，因为其强度是非常微调的，并根据环境光线自动调整。在一些Windows笔记本电脑中，键盘也通过传感器激活，但通常只有两个或最多三个级别的硬过渡。

大型TrackPad仍然是移动领域的标杆，与macOS的整合也很出色。由于Force Touch的存在，点击是均匀的，而且声音不大，手势的实现也很完美。像往常一样，MacBook Air不提供触摸屏。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光灯
键盘背光灯

显示屏 - 15.3英寸的液体视网膜屏

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵
下部边缘有最小的光晕（被相机放大了）
下部边缘有最小的光晕（被相机放大了）

MacBook Air 15使用15.3英寸、60赫兹IPS面板。分辨率是有点歪的2880 x 1864，这是由显示器上框的摄像头缺口造成的。实际的16:10面板的分辨率为2880 x 1800，额外的64个垂直像素只是添加在上面。凹槽并没有占用16:10显示屏的任何空间。

除了更高的分辨率，与13英寸机型相比，在技术规格上没有任何变化，我们可以确认宣传的500 cd/m²的亮度（实际上平均为501 cd/m²）。93%的照度也是非常均匀的。因此，SDR亮度与MacBook Pro机型相当，但缺乏对HDR的支持意味着Air将无法显示HDR内容的所有光彩。

IPS面板的黑值偏高，为0.39cd/m²，这就是为什么对比度 "只有"~1300：1。在黑暗的背景下，底部边缘可以看到轻微的光晕，但在我们的照片中，它们看起来是增强的（由于相机的原因）。响应时间对于一个日常设备来说完全没有问题，我们也没有注意到IPS面板上有任何PWM闪烁。亮度和色温都是自动控制的，这是任何Windows笔记本电脑都无法做到的，令人满意。然而，Air不得不放弃120赫兹的ProMotion技术。

485
cd/m²		482
cd/m²		499
cd/m²
503
cd/m²		517
cd/m²		505
cd/m²
502
cd/m²		512
cd/m²		501
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 517 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 500.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 513 cd/m²
Contrast: 1326:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"		Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
LQ150P1JX51, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"		LG Gram 15Z90Q
LG LP156WFC-SPZ2 (LGD0706), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
Samsung SDC4161, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6"		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Liquid Retina XDR, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"		Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2"
Display
-18%
-22%
4%
0%
0%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
98.7
68.1
-31%
63.5
-36%
99.9
1%
98.4
0%
99.1
0%
99.2
1%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
97.3
-3%
95
-5%
100
0%
99.9
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.9
70.3
-20%
65.1
-26%
98.6
12%
87.6
0%
88
0%
Response Times
-67%
-36%
93%
-23%
-217%
-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28.8 ?(14.2, 14.6)
52.4 ?(24.4, 28)
-82%
48.4 ?(21.6, 26.8)
-68%
0.74
97%
32.9 ?(17.8, 15.1)
-14%
42.8 ?(19.6, 23.2)
-49%
35.2 ?(12.8, 22.4)
-22%
Response Time Black / White *
18.9 ?(8.5, 10.4)
28.7 ?(13, 15.7)
-52%
19.6 ?(8, 11.6)
-4%
2 ?(1, 1)
89%
24.9 ?(10.4, 14.5)
-32%
91.6 ?(76, 15.6)
-385%
26.4 ?(11.2, 15.2)
-40%
PWM Frequency
22000 ?(50)
59 ?(50)
14880
14880 ?(100, 500)
Screen
12%
-44%
-63%
-2%
235%
235%
Brightness middle
517
397
-23%
420
-19%
378
-27%
526
2%
514
-1%
500
-3%
Brightness
501
399
-20%
399
-20%
378
-25%
486
-3%
497
-1%
489
-2%
Brightness Distribution
93
85
-9%
88
-5%
98
5%
87
-6%
95
2%
94
1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.29
26%
0.32
18%
0.38
3%
0.02
95%
0.02
95%
Contrast
1326
1369
3%
1313
-1%
1384
4%
25700
1838%
25000
1785%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
0.8
33%
2.51
-109%
2.2
-83%
1.3
-8%
1.4
-17%
1.2
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.5
1.4
44%
6.64
-166%
4.87
-95%
2.7
-8%
2.8
-12%
2.6
-4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.8
0.89
-11%
2.68
-235%
0.7
12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.1
39%
3.3
-83%
1.43
21%
2
-11%
2.3
-28%
1.7
6%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.18 101%
2.052 107%
2.47 89%
2.25 98%
2.27 97%
2.24 98%
CCT
6705 97%
6921 94%
6464 101%
6858 95%
6792 96%
6791 96%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-24% / -7%
-34% / -38%
11% / -20%
-8% / -4%
6% / 111%
68% / 165%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度（目标色彩空间P3）。
CalMAN灰度（目标色彩空间P3）。
CalMAN 饱和度（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（目标色彩空间 P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（目标色彩空间P3）。
CalMAN ColorChecker（目标色彩空间P3）。
CalMAN 灰度校准（目标色彩空间P3）。
CalMAN 灰度校准（目标色彩空间P3）。
CalMAN 饱和度已校准（目标色彩空间P3）。
CalMAN 饱和度已校准（目标色彩空间P3）。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准（目标色彩空间P3）。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准（目标色彩空间P3）。

MacBook Air开箱后已经有了很好的校准。我们使用专业的CalMAN软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）测量面板。与P3参考色空间相比，灰度和颜色的偏差都已经低于3，因此人眼无法分辨出与参考色的任何差异。然而，在色温有点过冷的情况下，有一个最小的偏蓝。我们能够消除这些小缺陷，并通过我们自己的校准（配置文件可在上面免费下载）在整体上改善显示器。sRGB和P3色彩空间被完全覆盖。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. Adobe
vs. Adobe

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.5 ms rise
↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.2 ms rise
↘ 14.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8734 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阴凉处
在阴凉处
在阳光下
在阳光下

MacBook Air的显示屏是有光泽的，但不像许多其他Windows笔记本电脑那样有光泽。当然，在户外还是会出现反光，但由于亮度好，你总能找到一个合适的位置。视角的稳定性非常好。

视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 -Apple M2，有10个GPU核心

MacBook Air 15专门配备了更快的M2芯片，它配备了10个GPU核心。该设备可以配置高达24GB的内存和2TB的PCIe固态硬盘，不过附加费用一如既往地巨大，最贵的版本要2979欧元（约3250美元）。

处理器

Geekbench：系统信息
Geekbench：系统信息

正如一开始提到的，在较大的MacBook Air中只使用了具有10个GPU内核的更强大的M2 SoC。该处理器提供8个内核，分为两个集群，每个集群4个内核。四个性能核心的最高频率为~3.5GHz，四个效率核心的最高频率为2.4GHz。M2在短时间内可消耗20瓦，但在持续负载下只有9瓦。

因此，该处理器已经使用了一年，这就是为什么在这里的性能方面没有惊喜。唯一的问题是被动冷却是否受益于更大的机箱，以及性能是否能更长时间地保持稳定。这里的答案是否定的，尽管目前非常炎热的温度（高达30°C/80°F）在这里可能会有一些影响。总的来说，短期基准测试和长期负载的结果都与较小的MacBook Air M2.Surface Laptop 5采用的是 酷睿i7-1255U的Surface Laptop 5在Cinebench R23等原生基准测试中仅略微快一些，但其 酷睿i5-1240P在LG的Gram 15中则要慢一些。

在电池模式下，CPU性能并没有下降。更多基准测试可在 我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2: Ø1063 (973.83-1209.85)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U: Ø1257 (1212.27-1577.22)
LG Gram 15Z90Q Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø974 (718.44-1478.52)
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø1970 (1926.5-2121.45)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2: Ø994 (917.47-1212.01)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro: Ø1681 (1674.55-1690.12)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry Apple M2 Pro 10-Core: Ø1658 (1642.58-1664.45)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU
CPU Performance Rating
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
84.9 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
83.6 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro -1!
Apple M1 Pro
81.4 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
78 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
72.4 pt
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
63.9 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
63.1 pt
Average Apple M2
 
61.7 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
61.4 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
12570 Points +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12370 Points +44%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
11811 Points +38%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1555 - 21812, n=63, last 2 years)
11805 Points +38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
8930 Points +4%
Average Apple M2
  (8517 - 8772, n=5)
8654 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
8569 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
8517 Points -1%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
8337 Points -3%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (358 - 2172, n=63, last 2 years)
1680 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
1673 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
1643 Points +3%
Average Apple M2
  (1580 - 1638, n=5)
1595 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
1589 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
1580 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1547 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1534 Points -3%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
1501 Points -6%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
4839 Points +108%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (579 - 8541, n=58, last 2 years)
4544 Points +96%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
3440 Points +48%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
3235 Points +39%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
3175 Points +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
2721 Points +17%
Average Apple M2
  (2231 - 2416, n=5)
2325 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
2324 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
2306 Points -1%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
644 Points +49%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (128 - 790, n=58, last 2 years)
637 Points +48%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
603 Points +40%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
572 Points +33%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
449 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
431 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
393 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
380 Points -12%
Average Apple M2
  (216 - 446, n=5)
371 Points -14%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
2121 (1926.5min - 2121.45max) Points +75%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years)
1992 Points +65%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1690 (1675min - 1690max) Points +40%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
1664 (1643min - 1664max) Points +38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
1577 (1212.27min - 1577.22max) Points +30%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
1479 (718.44min - 1478.52max) Points +22%
Average Apple M2
  (1210 - 1243, n=5)
1222 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
1212 (917min - 1212max) Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
1209.9 (973.83min, 974.802P1 - 1209.85max) Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years)
250 Points +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
243 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
239 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
231 Points +4%
Average Apple M2
  (222 - 229, n=5)
224 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
223 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
222 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
209 Points -6%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
209 Points -6%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
616.7 Seconds * -3%
Average Apple M2
  (549 - 713, n=5)
614 Seconds * -3%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
597 Seconds *
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
477 Seconds * +20%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
415 Seconds * +30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
383 Seconds * +36%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (159 - 2271, n=63, last 2 years)
357 Seconds * +40%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
252 Seconds * +58%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
183.3 Seconds * +69%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12499 Points +39%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
12189 Points +36%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2557 - 19529, n=59, last 2 years)
10264 Points +15%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
9263 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
8991 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
8961 Points
Average Apple M2
  (8491 - 8994, n=8)
8812 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
8770 Points -2%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
8747 Points -2%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
1926 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
1925 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
1917 Points
Average Apple M2
  (1887 - 1953, n=8)
1914 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (621 - 2555, n=59, last 2 years)
1799 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1768 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
1662 Points -13%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
1598 Points -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
1568 Points -18%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P
883 Seconds * -49%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
720 Seconds * -21%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
645 Seconds * -9%
Average Apple M2
  (540 - 702, n=4)
620 Seconds * -4%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
594 Seconds *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (237 - 1127, n=60, last 2 years)
552 Seconds * +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
435 Seconds * +27%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
425 Seconds * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1209.9 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
132.33 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.5 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
222 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
431 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2324 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8569 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1589 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
513 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
121 Points
Help

系统性能

主观的性能印象非常好，特别是在本地应用程序中。即使是像Adobe Photoshop或Premiere Pro这样的大型应用程序，对被动冷却的Air来说也没有问题。由于有Rosetta 2，Air可以模拟为x64 Macs制作的程序，这在实践中效果很好。然而，性能可能明显比本地应用程序差，特别是复杂的应用程序（如Photoshop）。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Speedometer 2.0: Result
CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1772 Points +17%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G
1590 Points +5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (365 - 2123, n=56, last 2 years)
1590 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
1556 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1520 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (1437 - 1585, n=8)
1517 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1497 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1496 Points -2%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G
1566 Points +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1543 Points +9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (364 - 1936, n=56, last 2 years)
1531 Points +8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1460 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1418 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (1319 - 1441, n=8)
1391 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1377 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
1342 Points -5%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
2239 Points +26%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
2054 Points +16%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (1765 - 1967, n=8)
1838 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1819 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1777 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (385 - 2594, n=56, last 2 years)
1749 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G
1708 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1630 Points -8%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Subnotebook
  (312 - 1899, n=56, last 2 years)
1352 Points +15%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G
1340 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1329 Points +13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1250 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1171 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (1008 - 1182, n=8)
1109 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1065 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
1055 Points -10%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
391 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
382 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
375 Points -2%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (342 - 387, n=7)
365 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
342 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (156 - 525, n=58, last 2 years)
308 Points -19%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
277 Points -27%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G
274 Points -28%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
263 Points -31%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average of class Subnotebook
  (132 - 338, n=56, last 2 years)
257 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
256 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
250 Points -2%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (223 - 256, n=7)
239 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
232 Points -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G
229 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
225 Points -12%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
223 Points -13%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
163 fps +176%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
159 fps +169%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
80 fps +36%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (59 - 85, n=4)
70.8 fps +20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (59 - 67, n=3, last 2 years)
64 fps +8%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
59 fps
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
34 fps +36%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (25 - 32, n=3, last 2 years)
29.7 fps +19%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
27 fps +8%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
25 fps
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (24 - 26, n=4)
24.8 fps -1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
24 fps -4%
Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (117 - 478, n=37, last 2 years)
294 Points +23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
248.5 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G
242.56 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
238.9 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (220 - 257, n=8)
236 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
234.8 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
226.8 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
213.5 Points -11%
Speedometer 2.0 / Result
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
428 runs/min
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
395 runs/min -8%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
392 runs/min -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (110 - 726, n=28, last 2 years)
365 runs/min -15%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (437 - 445, n=9)
364 runs/min -15%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
299 runs/min -30%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
276 runs/min -36%

存储设备

这款固态硬盘是AP1024Z，我们已经从较小的型号中知道了它。它是一种PCIe 3.0固态硬盘，存储容量为1TB，其中968GB在首次启动时即可使用。传输速率达到了预期水平，即使专业型号的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘速度更快，在日常使用中也没有任何限制。更多SSD基准测试可在这里。

无定形磁盘标记
无定形磁盘标记
无定形内存标记（AmorphousMemoryMark
无定形内存标记（AmorphousMemoryMark
Drive Performance Rating | Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
100 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
63.2 pt
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z
 
58.5 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512Z
54.4 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple SSD AP1024Z
49.7 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple SSD AP1024Z
49 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
26.7 pt
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
5359.8 MB/s +88%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2848 - 5175, n=4, last 2 years)
3469 MB/s +22%
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z
  (2797 - 4860, n=5)
3240 MB/s +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512Z
2901.3 MB/s +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2847.5 MB/s
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2796.5 MB/s -2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
1475.8 MB/s -48%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
6388.9 MB/s +122%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2873 - 6431, n=4, last 2 years)
3941 MB/s +37%
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z
  (2873 - 6126, n=5)
3609 MB/s +26%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512Z
3489.5 MB/s +21%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple SSD AP1024Z
3017.3 MB/s +5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2873.2 MB/s
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
1652.8 MB/s -42%

图形

3DMark野生动物极端压力测试
3DMark野生动物极端压力测试

Apple M2 SoC的图形适配器提供10个核心，工作频率最高为1.4GHz。iGPU的性能仍然非常好，远远领先于目前英特尔和AMD的iGPU。在日常生活中，iGPU可以轻松应对所有任务，包括播放高分辨率的视频。

然而，正如小型MacBook Air M2一样，性能并没有保持恒定，但在一样，性能并没有保持恒定，而是在持续负载几分钟后下降了约25%。但在电池模式下没有进一步的性能下降。更多的GPU基准测试列在 这里.

3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench 5.5 | Blender
3DMark - Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
11224 Points +63%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
10352 Points +51%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6869 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6824 Points -1%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (5328 - 6987, n=8)
6533 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
4455 Points -35%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
3658 Points -47%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
78.7 fps +64%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
71.7 fps +50%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
48.6 fps +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
47.9 fps
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (35.6 - 48.6, n=7)
43.9 fps -8%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
181.1 fps +68%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
166 fps +54%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
110 fps +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
107.7 fps
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (68 - 110, n=8)
96 fps -11%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
42483 Points +53%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
37867 Points +37%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
34368 Points +24%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
31564 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27696 Points
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (27489 - 27965, n=4)
27688 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27489 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
18173 Points -34%
LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
15648 Points -44%
Metal Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
46834 Points +55%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
42115 Points +40%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (30149 - 33465, n=5)
30921 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
30269 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
30149 Points
Blender - v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
237 Seconds *
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (205 - 237, n=2)
221 Seconds * +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
132 Seconds * +44%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在上周的WWDC之后，MacBook上的游戏景观可能很快就会发生巨大的变化。除了《无人的天空》 或《死亡搁浅》等原生游戏应该在未来推出外，Apple ，提出了 "游戏移植工具包"，允许开发者相对容易地将DirectX 12游戏移植到MacOS。Cyberpoint 2077等游戏的演示已经在Apple 硬件上运行得比较好。该技术是基于CrossOver的源代码，我们也用它来运行Windows游戏，如 Witcher 3在目前的MacBooks上。这里的游戏性能与小型MacBook Air M2相当。

lowmed.highultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 34 28
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 76 31 27 23
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 136 39 22 16
Borderlands 3 (2019) 66.8 34 22 15

排放 - 静音操作；更好的扬声器

噪声

由于MacBook Air 15没有风扇，它在任何时候都是绝对安静的。在我们的测试设备中没有检测到任何电子噪音，如线圈啸叫。

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z		Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N		LG Gram 15Z90Q
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR		Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G		Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R		Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
Noise
off / environment *
23.3
25
26
24.7
23.6
Idle Minimum *
23.3
26
26
24.7
23.6
Idle Average *
23.3
27
26
24.7
23.6
Idle Maximum *
23.3
28
28.1
24.7
23.6
Load Average *
35
37
56.9
26.1
24.2
Witcher 3 ultra *
38.1
37
Load Maximum *
38.1
37
62.6
37.4
47.5

* ... smaller is better

温度

Apple MacBook Air 15的表面温度得到了很好的控制，在日常使用或要求不高的任务中没有任何限制。热点在基本单元的中上部，即处理器所在的地方。我们在高负荷和游戏时测得的温度高达45℃，当然用手指就能感觉到，但没有问题。底部的温度保持在42℃的最高水平。Air 15可以在任何时候放在大腿上。

Max. Load
 42.7 °C45.1 °C39.1 °C 
 39.3 °C39.9 °C36.9 °C 
 34.5 °C31.8 °C33.5 °C 
Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 38.1 °C
40 °C42.5 °C41.5 °C
37.7 °C39.9 °C40.2 °C
33.8 °C34.7 °C34.5 °C
Maximum: 42.5 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.8 °C | Room Temperature 23.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
压力测试中的热量分布（顶部）
压力测试中的热量分布（顶部）
应力测试中的热量分布（底）。
应力测试中的热量分布（底）。
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU		Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs		LG Gram 15Z90Q
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs		Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M		Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU		Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
Heat
3%
1%
-22%
0%
8%
6%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.1
44.6
1%
46
-2%
50.2
-11%
44.7
1%
41
9%
47
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
42.5
47.4
-12%
45
-6%
50.2
-18%
44.6
-5%
39
8%
42.8
-1%
Idle Upper Side *
25.9
22.6
13%
25
3%
32.1
-24%
25.1
3%
24
7%
22.3
14%
Idle Bottom *
25.8
23.3
10%
24
7%
34.6
-34%
25.3
2%
24
7%
21.7
16%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在压力测试中，该SoC的行为再次与较小的MacBook Air相当。在运行Cinebench R23和3DMark Wildlife Extreme压力测试期间（这当然是Air的极端情况），M2芯片的消耗在短时间内稳定在8.5-9瓦特左右。更大的Air 15有轻微的优势，但在实践中你无法真正感知到这一点。

0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø5.23 (3.794-13.405)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø4.28 (3.27-13.289)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø5 (3.802-18.05)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø4.04 (3.269-17.596)

发言人

对于声音系统，Apple ，将模块的数量从4个增加到6个，这在我们的音频分析中也很明显，与较小的MacBook Air M2.更大的MacBook Pro 16的声音系统更有冲击力，但这是发散性的。总的来说，扬声器的性能非常好，很多时候你不需要外部扬声器或耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs205046.52535.536.73134.334.94043.939.25036.133.26329.739803049.210031.355.11252561.91602160.720020.465.825020.769.731517.271.940014.771.650012.270.263012.470.580011.868.4100011.268.112501170.9160010.873.8200011.272.6250011.871.531501270.6400012.474.7500012.575.7630012.776.1800012.674.81000012.674.11250012.571.61600011.965.4SPL25.285N0.768.4median 12.5median 70.9Delta3.22.626.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.227.828.528.427.522.324.327.93122.128.821.524.718.132.716.950.718.556.91851.916.456.915.56014.365.312.968.612.270.911.969.211.567.111.868.211.167.911.369.311.57111.671.612.172.412.671.912.471.612.972.113.169.412.771.712.872.113.660.824.482.70.658.3median 12.7median 69.21.34.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 ProApple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--Air 15的电池寿命甚至更长

消耗功率

MacBook Air 15的效率很高，但消耗量受屏幕亮度的影响很大，极低亮度和最大亮度之间的差异约为7-8瓦。在我们的压力测试中，35瓦的电源限制了功耗：例如，我们在使用65瓦的电源时测得的功耗高达57瓦，之后的一段时间则为38瓦。在压力测试过程中，消费水平为26瓦。因此，35瓦的电源太弱了，但由于SoC在CPU和GPU同时受压时节流速度相当快，在日常使用中的影响相当小。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.17 / 0.29 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.2 / 10 / 10.1 Watt
Load midlight 33.6 / 37.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"		Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"		LG Gram 15Z90Q
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6"		Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 		Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-36%
-37%
-72%
3%
23%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
2.2
3.8
-73%
4
-82%
4.4
-100%
1.9
14%
1.93 ?(1.1 - 2.54, n=8)
12%
4.47 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=59, last 2 years)
-103%
Idle Average *
10
8.2
18%
7
30%
5.1
49%
9.6
4%
7.94 ?(3.6 - 11.2, n=7)
21%
7.63 ?(2.5 - 16, n=59, last 2 years)
24%
Idle Maximum *
10.1
8.4
17%
13
-29%
9.3
8%
9.7
4%
7.5 ?(2.6 - 11.5, n=8)
26%
9.57 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=59, last 2 years)
5%
Load Average *
33.6
50.1
-49%
45
-34%
67
-99%
32.4
4%
21.6 ?(9.1 - 33.6, n=8)
36%
46.5 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=57, last 2 years)
-38%
Witcher 3 ultra *
27.8
38.8
-40%
35.2
-27%
66.4
-139%
30.8
-11%
Load Maximum *
37.2
69.6
-87%
66
-77%
93.5
-151%
35.7
4%
30.1 ?(10.2 - 56, n=8)
19%
68.5 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=59, last 2 years)
-84%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

05101520253035Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø27.8 (23.7-31.5)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø31 (25.6-37.2)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.32 (4.98-5.62)

Power consumption with an external monitor

051015202530Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø11 (10.5-12.2)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø25.9 (23-31.1)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø25.1 (21.7-26.3)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.98 (3.89-4.34)

电池寿命

更大的外壳主要用于更大的电池；Air 15的电池容量为66.5Wh，而不是13英寸机型的52.6Wh。在150cd/m²亮度的视频和WLAN测试中（亮度减少了7个大级别和2个小级别），Air 15实现了极长的电池运行时间，约为16.5小时。这使它比小型的MBA 13至少领先一个小时，而且只被较大的MacBook Pro 16打败，后者配备的电池明显更大（99.6Wh）。在全亮度的WLAN测试中，我们测得的稳定运行时间刚刚超过7小时；在负载（和最大亮度）下，电池在3:15小时内就没电了。

Apple在我们审查期间，70瓦的电源没有提供给我们。当设备打开时，用附带的35瓦电源完全充电需要约2:50小时，而用普通的65瓦电源（USB-C）则减少到约2小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Safari 15.6)
16h 33min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Safari 15.6)
7h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 17min
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh		Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U
i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.4 Wh		LG Gram 15Z90Q
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 80 Wh		Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, 70 Wh		Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh		Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
M2 Pro 10-Core, M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, 70 Wh		Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
-40%
-20%
-41%
-9%
3%
-12%
-26%
H.264
1005
584
-42%
766
-24%
946
-6%
1048
4%
982
-2%
896 ?(527 - 1251, n=26, last 2 years)
-11%
WiFi v1.3
993
517
-48%
716
-28%
692
-30%
884
-11%
1016
2%
774
-22%
724 ?(389 - 1585, n=61, last 2 years)
-27%
Load
197
138
-30%
173
-12%
59
-70%
116.6 ?(57 - 197, n=46, last 2 years)
-41%

Pros

+ 高质量和薄的外壳
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 静音操作
+ 使用P3和无PWM时显示更亮
+ 非常好的扬声器
+ 在150尼特条件下电池寿命长
+ 良好的系统性能
+ MagSafe

Cons

- 既没有Thunderbolt 4，也没有160MHz的Wi-Fi 6；只可能有一个外部显示器
- 只有PCIe 3.0固态硬盘
- 电源太弱
- 高负载时功率明显下降
- 入门价格高，升级成本高

结论--MacBook Air 15是无聊的好东西

在审查中： Apple Macbook Air 15 M2。测试设备由Apple 德国提供。
在审查中： Apple Macbook Air 15 M2。测试设备由Apple 德国提供。

新的MacBook Air 15是一个非常好的，但也是一个无聊的设备，因为除了更大的屏幕和更高的价格之外，与较小的MacBook Air相比没有任何区别。 MacBook Air M2除了更大的屏幕和更高的价格外，与去年的小型MacBook Air M2相比没有任何区别。没有新的处理器，没有额外的端口，只有通常的基本硬件--但整体包装非常好，它只是简单地工作。最重要的是，在日常使用中，没有风扇是一个不应该被低估的方面。在我们看来，Air可以做得更好，但Apple ，在这里对自己很宽容。

15英寸机型的外壳看起来更平坦，但Air 15绝不是一个超过1.5公斤的轻型产品。显示屏非常好，质量也可与较小的Air媲美。当然，与MacBook Pro相比有一些缺点，但没有PWM，这对一些用户来说当然是一个重要因素。扬声器有两个额外的模块，总体上要好一点，但仍然没有像 MacBook Pro 16.另一方面，Apple ，与较小的兄弟姐妹相比，电池寿命也得到了改善。

Apple 为客户提供了他们想要的东西：一个更大的MacBook Air。虽然一年后，新的MacBook Air 15与它较小的兄弟姐妹的区别仅在于显示屏的大小。所有其他优点和缺点都被简单地照搬过来。这里没有创新，但这并不改变这一事实，即这也是一台总体上非常好的笔记本电脑。

我们怀疑Apple ，原本计划推出配备新M3 SoC的大型MacBook Air 15，但它根本还没有准备好。说实话，这并不是一个真正的问题，因为被动冷却的M2 SoC对大多数用户来说仍然提供足够的性能。即使是采用M1芯片的2020年老款MacBook Air仍然可以毫不犹豫地被推荐。然而，Apple ，试图实现利润最大化，特别是在内存方面，这也可以从只配备8GB内存的两个基本型号（256或512GB固态硬盘）看出。这些基本型号经常降价（甚至新的Air 15已经可以以更低的价格买到），但想要更多内存的人通常要支付高额的附加费。而230欧元（200美元）的8GB内存，说白了就是太离谱了。你还应该记住一些方面，如不存在的维护和升级选项。如果这些在购买决定中发挥了重要作用，那么大飞机15从一开始就失去了资格。

来自Windows阵营的最大竞争对手可能是微软的 Surface Laptop 5但它几乎在每个方面都落后，而且也被微软忽视了。这款 LG Gram 15要轻得多，只有1.1公斤，但在大多数其他方面的表现比Air 15差。

从性价比的角度来看，14英寸MacBook Pro是一个不错的选择。 14英寸MacBook Pro自然是更好的选择，因为现在的市场价格约为2050欧元（1999.99美元），这与配备16GB内存和512GB SSD存储的新MacBook Air 15相当。此外，Pro配备了迷你LED面板，性能明显更强。但事实是，这两款设备并不相互竞争，Apple ，Air 15针对的是不同的目标群体，他们只是想要一个更大的MacBook Air。如果考虑到macOS和大量预装软件（完整的办公套件、视频编辑等），MacBook Air M2（不管是13英寸还是15英寸）只是一个非常好的整体包装，电池寿命长。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

在美国，新MacBook Air 15的两种配置目前在亚马逊已经售罄，但在百思买以1299.00美元（256GB）或1499.00美元（512GB）的价格出售所有四种颜色：

价格和供应情况截至2023年6月19日，可能会有变化。

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB - 06/19/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
91%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
62 / 75 → 82%
Weight
69 / 20-75 → 89%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
66 / 78 → 85%
Application Performance
93 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
92 / 91 → 100%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
83%
92%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB (MacBook Air 15 2023 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2回顾：日常使用的MacBook现在有了15英寸
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-06-20 (Update: 2023-06-20)