Notebookcheck Logo

微软 Lumia 650 智能手机简短评测

主流微软。 来自微软的最新Lumia 650希望通过有竞争力的定价和Windows操作系统征服用户。这家来自雷德蒙德的生产商特别将标枪对准了商务用户。由于较慢的硬件，它的表现一般，同时也缺少对Windows Continuum功能的支持。
Smartphone Touchscreen Windows
Microsoft Lumia 650 (Lumia Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A7
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 304
Memory
1024 MB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式, OLED, Clear Black, TrueColor, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 最大支持 200 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 近距传感器，环境光传感器，加速传感器, WiFi-Direct
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850,900, 1800 和 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900 和 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 4 (800, 900, 1800, 2100 和 2600 MHz), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 142 x 70.9
Battery
7.6 Wh, 2000 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 624 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2, 焦距: 28 mm, 自动对焦, LED 闪光灯)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.2, 广角)
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 固定USB线缆的电源适配器，电池，说明书, Microsoft Edge, Outlook, Facebook, WhatsApp, OneDrive, Xbox Live Hub, Skype, Microsoft Office (OneNote, Word, Excel, PowerPoint), Amazon, Netflix, Lumia Offers, Audible, Expedia, Maps, Help + Tips, Shazam, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
122 g, Power Supply: 64 g
Price
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
144 mm 71.5 mm 10.5 mm 140 g142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g145 mm 71.5 mm 6.5 mm 118 g142.1 mm 71.8 mm 7.9 mm 147 g142 mm 72 mm 7.7 mm 144 g140.5 mm 70.3 mm 8.6 mm 131 g142 mm 70.9 mm 6.9 mm 122 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
372
cd/m²		344
cd/m²		342
cd/m²
372
cd/m²		349
cd/m²		341
cd/m²
369
cd/m²		350
cd/m²		342
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 372 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 353.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.67 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.06
Microsoft Lumia 650
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 16 GB eMMC Flash		Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash		Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash		Archos Diamond S
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash		Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash		Allview E4
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash		LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
-25%
7%
-46%
-44%
-28%
-59%
Brightness middle
349
418
20%
467
34%
357
2%
349
0%
534
53%
518
48%
Brightness
353
407
15%
460
30%
363
3%
353
0%
503
42%
492
39%
Brightness Distribution
92
95
3%
95
3%
95
3%
93
1%
82
-11%
91
-1%
Black Level *
0.49
0.3
0.57
0.51
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
3.92
-51%
3.28
-26%
6.11
-135%
5.22
-101%
5.65
-117%
5.41
-108%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.2
9.91
-21%
8.76
-7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
3.81
-112%
1.89
-5%
4.12
-129%
3.96
-120%
3.69
-105%
7.67
-326%
Gamma
2.06 107%
2.27 97%
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
2.08 106%
2.15 102%
2.19 100%
CCT
6542 99%
7361 88%
6734 97%
7272 89%
7308 89%
7289 89%
8521 76%
Contrast
853
1557
937
1016

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | Linpack Android / IOS | BaseMark OS II | AnTuTu v6 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
5.67 fps
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
9.5 fps +68%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
9.2 fps +62%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
21 fps +270%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
20 fps +253%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
5.2 fps -8%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
3.25 fps
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
5.3 fps +63%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
5.2 fps +60%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
12 fps +269%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
12 fps +269%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
9.8 fps +202%
Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
223.6 MFLOPS
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
207.7 MFLOPS -7%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
202 MFLOPS -10%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
272.2 MFLOPS +22%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
55.9 MFLOPS
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
117.1 MFLOPS +109%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
87.7 MFLOPS +57%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
111.5 MFLOPS +99%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
546 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
484 Points -11%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
643 Points +18%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
729 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
615 Points +13%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
731 Points +34%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
696 Points +27%
Graphics (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
207 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
315 Points +52%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
316 Points +53%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
421 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
314 Points +52%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
423 Points +104%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
312 Points +51%
Memory (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
575 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
394 Points -31%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
797 Points +39%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
949 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
399 Points -31%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
877 Points +53%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
427 Points -26%
System (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
552 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
1166 Points +111%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
1077 Points +95%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
1792 Points +225%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
1058 Points +92%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
1694 Points +207%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
1068 Points +93%
Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
435 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
515 Points +18%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
646 Points +49%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
850 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
534 Points +23%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
823 Points +89%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
561 Points +29%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
31844 Points
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
35194 Points +11%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
37203 Points +17%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
2574 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
3296 Points +28%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
3012 Points +17%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
2754 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
3038 Points +18%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
3177 Points +23%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
3028 Points +18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
18237 ms *
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
11843 ms * +35%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 2048
14680 ms * +20%
Archos Diamond S
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
13398 ms * +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
14074 ms * +23%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
13149 ms * +28%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
13980 ms * +23%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 1024
52 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1024
52 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
52 Points 0%
Allview E4
Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
59 Points +13%
LG Class
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 1536
57 Points +10%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 36.2 °C37.2 °C35.1 °C 
 36.3 °C36.7 °C36.4 °C 
 35.1 °C35.5 °C35.1 °C 
Maximum: 37.2 °C
Average: 36 °C
37.7 °C38.2 °C35.5 °C
36 °C33.7 °C33.3 °C
33.9 °C33.7 °C32.5 °C
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Microsoft Lumia 650
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 16 GB eMMC Flash		Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash		Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash		Archos Diamond S
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash		Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash		Allview E4
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash		LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Heat
-6%
1%
4%
-2%
-16%
-1%
Maximum Upper Side *
37.2
41.2
-11%
41.1
-10%
34.3
8%
38.3
-3%
41.3
-11%
38.6
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
38.2
39.2
-3%
37
3%
33.7
12%
37.7
1%
45.1
-18%
35
8%
Idle Upper Side *
30.9
33.4
-8%
30
3%
32
-4%
31.9
-3%
36
-17%
34.2
-11%
Idle Bottom *
30.5
31.1
-2%
27.9
9%
31
-2%
30.8
-1%
35.3
-16%
29.6
3%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.22 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.1 / 1.18 Watt
Load midlight 4.04 / 4.07 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Lumia 650
7.6 Wh		Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
 Wh		Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
 Wh		Archos Diamond S
 Wh		Samsung Galaxy J5
10 Wh		Allview E4
8 Wh		LG Class
 Wh
Power Consumption
11%
18%
-10%
-64%
-193%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.4
43%
0.5
29%
0.8
-14%
1.5
-114%
3.11
-344%
1.2
-71%
Idle Average *
1.1
1
9%
0.9
18%
1.21
-10%
2.2
-100%
4.06
-269%
1.9
-73%
Idle Maximum *
1.18
1.2
-2%
1.1
7%
1.32
-12%
2.4
-103%
4.23
-258%
2.2
-86%
Load Average *
4.04
2.9
28%
2.4
41%
3.73
8%
3.5
13%
5.53
-37%
3.1
23%
Load Maximum *
4.07
5
-23%
4.3
-6%
4.97
-22%
4.8
-18%
6.33
-56%
5.6
-38%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
15h 10min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 33min
Microsoft Lumia 650
7.6 Wh		Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
 Wh		Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
 Wh		Archos Diamond S
 Wh		Samsung Galaxy J5
10 Wh		Allview E4
8 Wh		LG Class
 Wh
Battery Runtime
40%
-23%
38%
45%
-10%
11%
Reader / Idle
910
1364
50%
1292
42%
827
-9%
976
7%
H.264
510
677
33%
657
29%
456
-11%
628
23%
WiFi v1.3
345
526
52%
267
-23%
475
38%
495
43%
315
-9%
422
22%
Load
213
264
24%
350
64%
193
-9%
196
-8%

Pros

+ 高品质的坚固机身
+ 可拆卸机身后盖
+ 可更换电池
+ 支持microSD卡扩展
+ 出色的AMOLED屏幕，无闪烁
+ 不错的相机
+ 优秀的GPS模组
+ 微软Office

Cons

- 一般的电池续航
- 性能较低
- 无附带USB数据线或耳机
- 不支持Continuum或Windows Hello
- 扬声器较差
- 固定线缆的电源适配器输出功率较低
In review: Microsoft Lumia 650. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: Microsoft Lumia 650. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

这台微软Lumia是前代机型Lumia 640的优秀继任者。这台主流智能手机现在沿用了同门师兄Lumia 950/Lumia 950 XL的设计语言，也搭配了高品质机身以及AMOLED屏幕。不过在测试之后，我们不太明白为什么它会成为商务用户的理想设备。我们无法得到一些功能如Windows Hello或Continuum，所以它最大的特色只剩微软Office了。

Lumia 650的缺点很明显是较慢的处理器。Windows 10移动版的运行十分流畅，不过在复杂应用中Nike 以感觉到卡顿和延迟。另外Windows系统还有一个问题，它的可选应用相比安卓或iOS非常有限。在更换Windows 10移动版设备之前你需要提前看一看你最喜欢的应用是否提供了它的版本。

微软Lumia 650是一台搭配优秀屏幕的不错主流智能手机。不过你需要注意Windows 10移动版的限制，以及它较弱的性能。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。 

Microsoft Lumia 650 - 05/09/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
74 / 75 → 98%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
35 / 60 → 59%
Weight
95%
Battery
88%
Display
87%
Games Performance
3 / 63 → 5%
Application Performance
28 / 70 → 40%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
71%
Average
69%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微软 Lumia 650 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-05-19 (Update: 2016-05-21)