华为MateBook 16s 2023评测 - 多媒体笔记本电脑现在有了更明亮的3:2显示屏

Name: Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Brand: Huawei

猛禽湖的更新。

通过MateBook 16s，华为提供了采用英特尔处理器的大型多媒体笔记本电脑。现在是2023年，它包括目前猛禽湖H系列的酷睿i9和一个更明亮的显示屏。在我们的测试中，这款来自中国的高档笔记本电脑显示了它的许多优势和很少的弱点。

Marc Herter (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/15/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Windows

作为最大的网络设备和移动电子产品制造商之一，华为向消费者提供智能手机、平板电脑、智能手表和笔记本电脑。虽然该制造商的Android 设备在西方世界主要受阻于美国的制裁，但华为的个人电脑和笔记本电脑并没有受到类似的限制。它们配备了当前的Windows版本和英特尔或AMD的强大处理器。我们的测试装置包含一个英特尔酷睿i9-13900H，华为将其安置在一个由铝和玻璃制成的优雅外壳中。华为MateBook 16s主要以全面的声音给我们带来惊喜。除了Apple ，我们已经很久没有在测试中遇到声音这么好的笔记本电脑了。
3:2格式的IPS面板，2.5K分辨率，提供了一个体面的图像。此外，还有TÜV Rheinland（德国技术认证机构）颁发的三份证书，分别是色彩准确性、显示器的低蓝光含量和无闪烁。

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 (MateBook 16s Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Memory

16 GB

, DDR5

Display

16.00 inch 3:2, 2560 x 1680 pixel 191 PPI, BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

321JN1024GB-TX01, 1024 GB

, 1TB SSD

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset port, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.8 x 351 x 254.9

Battery

84 Wh, 7330 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: HD 720p, pop-up

Additional features

Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.99 kg

Price

1650 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

凭借其轻巧的金属外壳和英特尔酷睿i9，这款16英寸设备是为具有高级品味的客户提供的多媒体笔记本电脑。凭借这一点，华为MateBook s16的直接竞争对手包括联想Yoga 7i ，三星Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 ，还有Apple MacBook Pro 16 。那些寻找明显更轻的笔记本电脑的人可以在LG Gram 16 或17 中找到它。你可以在下面的表格中看到我们对这些竞争对手的测试链接：

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2 kg	17.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1680
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.6 kg	19 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
85.8 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2 kg	16.99 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.6 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.6 kg	12.5 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
93.7 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU	2.2 kg	16.8 mm	16.20"	3456x2234
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2023	LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	16.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

案例

在MateBook 16s的设计中，华为受到Apple MacBook Pro的启发。但MateBook只是看起来更苗条、更现代。在做工质量方面几乎没有任何弱点。所有部件都紧紧贴合，在试图翘起笔记本时没有任何吱吱作响。显示器很容易移动，可以打开到大约160°的角度。铰链不会因为一些轻微的振动而偏离其位置。不幸的是，键盘已经可以被一些轻度的压力压下去了。除了按键之外，该设备的所有表面都是由铝或玻璃制成的，这也为多媒体笔记本电脑提供了高质量的外观。

笔记本电脑的重量约为2公斤（约4.4磅）。除了三星Galaxy Book3和LG Gram 16的轻量级产品外，16英寸笔记本电脑都属于大致相同的重量范围。在厚度方面，竞争对手也相当相似。那些正在寻找真正苗条的16英寸笔记本电脑的人可能需要选择三星设备。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max LG Gram 16Z90Q Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 DIN A4 ❌

装备

华为MateBook 16s的连接大约符合当前多媒体笔记本电脑的标准。但不幸的是，这里没有SD卡读卡器。两个USB-C端口中只有一个支持ThunderBolt 4，但两个端口都提供DisplayPort和PowerDelivery。通常情况下，两个端口中的一个会被附带的USB-C充电器占据。

USB-C（PowerDelivery和DisplayPort）；USB-C（Thunderbolt 4、PowerDelivery和DisplayPort）；HDMI接口（HDMI 2.0）；3.5毫米立体声耳机接口

沟通

这款笔记本电脑也使用英特尔WiFi AX211作为WiFi模块。虽然它在上升和下载过程中提供了良好的传输速度，但与5GHz无线局域网相比，它在6GHz网络中几乎没有显示任何优势。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1619 (1559^min - 1692^max) MBit/s +8%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1571 (1517^min - 1590^max) MBit/s +5%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1498 (704^min - 1623^max) MBit/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1492 (829^min - 1665^max) MBit/s 0%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1459 (796^min - 1577^max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1921, n=78, last 2 years)	1359 MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=239)	1234 MBit/s -18%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1086 (810^min - 1178^max) MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1608 (1562^min - 1631^max) MBit/s +9%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1553 (1528^min - 1565^max) MBit/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1529 (1477^min - 1553^max) MBit/s +4%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1476 (1300^min - 1531^max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia (709 - 1789, n=77, last 2 years)	1447 MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=239)	1379 MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1327 (1121^min - 1384^max) MBit/s -10%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort	1730 (1700^min, 1701.74^P1 - 1747^max) MBit/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1623 (1172^min - 1690^max) MBit/s +13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1583 (1034^min - 1700^max) MBit/s +10%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1442 (1087^min - 1646^max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia (705 - 1816, n=37, last 2 years)	1416 MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=211)	1372 MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1180 (1054^min - 1237^max) MBit/s -18%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort	1803 (1749^min, 1751.9^P1 - 1853^max) MBit/s +17%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1712 (1593^min - 1743^max) MBit/s +11%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1539 (1497^min - 1558^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1502 (1405^min - 1524^max) MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1501 (1422^min - 1563^max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia (700 - 1807, n=37, last 2 years)	1494 MBit/s -3%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=210)	1493 MBit/s -3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1337 (676^min - 1552^max) MBit/s -13%

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1442 (1087-1646)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1583 (1034-1700)

Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1180 (1054-1237)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1623 (1172-1690)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1730 (1700-1747)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1539 (1497-1558)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1337 (676-1552)

Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1501 (1422-1563)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1711 (1593-1743)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1501 (1405-1524)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1803 (1749-1853)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1474 (704-1623)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1433 (796-1577)

Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1086 (810-1178)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1465 (829-1665)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1619 (1559-1692)

LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1571 (1517-1590)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1300-1531)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1552 (1528-1565)

Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1326 (1121-1384)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1528 (1477-1553)

LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1607 (1562-1631)

网络摄像头

内置全高清摄像头的网络图像提供了相当好的对比度和清晰度。图像质量只在边缘处有最小的下降。然而，由于暗部的最大ΔΕ为24，亮部的最大ΔΕ为19.1，摄像头的颜色偏差相对较高。 MateBook在弱光条件下也很吃力，图像很快就变得有颗粒感和噪音。

稍微不寻常的是内置麦克风的位置，它们被放置在MateBook底座前面用于打开显示屏的小凹槽里。然而，通常情况下，语音质量不会因此而受到负面影响。

ColorChecker Huawei MateBook 16s i9: 19.98 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 25.8 ∆E

安全问题

你可以通过指纹扫描仪登录笔记本电脑。此外，英特尔酷睿i9的安全功能也可以使用。该笔记本电脑还提供TPM 2.0。虽然安全启动是可用的，但默认情况下是停用的。

辅料

除了MateBook和USB-C充电器外，盒子里只包括必须的文件集。但是，如果你直接从华为（在德国）订购笔记本电脑，在本次测试时，你还可以免费得到一个MateView SE显示器、一个背包和一个无线鼠标，这些都是随笔记本电脑一起提供的。

维护

笔记本电脑的底盖由10颗TX5螺丝和几个塑料夹子固定在位。要接触MateBook 16s的电子元件，除了一把螺丝刀和撬动工具外，你不需要其他东西。一个强大的吸盘可能也会使移除塑料夹子更容易。卸下螺丝后，你可以使用撬动工具，从铰链开始，努力松开笔记本电脑周围的夹子。

然而，一旦进入内部，你就没有太多的维修选择了。工作存储器和WLAN模块是焊接在一起的，为了拆下电池，你必须拆下一些额外的螺丝，其中一些被贴纸封住。有帮助的是，你可以拿出两个风扇，而不必拆下整个冷却系统，这使得清洁冷却鳍和风扇变得更加容易。

担保

我们的测试装置是一个评估设备，不用于销售，所以没有保修。一般来说，华为在欧盟为其笔记本电脑的显示屏、主板、键盘、电池和充电器提供24个月的保修。

输入设备

拥有16英寸显示屏的笔记本电脑通常也提供全尺寸键盘。然而，由于华为在这里遵循Apple's MacBook的设计，它放弃了数字块。除了键盘和ClickPad之外，MateBook 16s还包括一个触摸屏。

键盘

华为笔记本电脑的键盘提供了一个背景照明和1.5毫米的键程。再加上清晰可见的压力点，这导致了舒适的触觉。作为一个小的特殊功能，华为在F6和F7键之间的顶部键行放置了一个键来启动Windows语音输入。键盘布局与欧洲标准一致（在德国）。

触摸板

由于其哑光玻璃表面，大的14×9厘米（约5.5×3.5英寸）ClickPad应该能够长时间保持其舒适的触觉。它对最多五个手指的输入作出反应，其手掌识别效果良好。

触摸屏

由于其反射表面，MateBook 16s的触摸屏更像是一个指纹磁铁。显示器对多达十个手指的输入没有任何延迟的反应。然而，这种表面可以使手指更容易滑动。

显示

华为MateBook 16s的3:2显示屏的分辨率为2,560 × 1,680像素。在反光玻璃后面，你可以找到一个对比度丰富的IPS面板。该显示屏拥有德国认证机构TÜV Rheinland的三项不同认证，应该是低蓝光排放，无闪烁，并提供准确的色彩。华为宣传它的对比度为1.500:1，100%的sRGB色彩空间覆盖率，交付状态下的色彩精确度为ΔE<1。在我们的测量中，这台笔记本电脑错过了所有这三个数值，但差距不大。我们看到的仍然是一个良好而明亮的显示屏，亮度为435.9cd/m²。我们几乎没有发现亮度分布中的任何缺陷。


434 cd/m²	430 cd/m²	454 cd/m²
430 cd/m²	448 cd/m²	433 cd/m²
434 cd/m²	439 cd/m²	421 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 454 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 448 cd/m²
Contrast: 1280:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.64
ΔE Greyscale 2.78 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
2.43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, 2560x1680, 16"	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Au Optronics B160QAN02.L, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"	LG Gram 16Z90Q LG LP160WQ1-SPB2 (LGD06EB), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		39%	-33%	31%	37%	33%	30%
Display P3 Coverage	63	99.91 59%	42 -33%	98.5 56%	99.7 58%	99 57%	96.8 54%
sRGB Coverage	94.9	100 5%	62.8 -34%	99.9 5%	100 5%	100 5%	99.9 5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.1	98.87 52%	43.5 -33%	86.1 32%	97 49%	88.5 36%	84.6 30%
Response Times		318%	-9%	74%	91%	18939%	-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	34 ?(16, 18)	2 ?(1, 1) 94%	31.8 ?(15.4, 16.4) 6%	2 ?(1, 1) 94%	2 ?(1, 1) 94%	80.5 ?(38.5, 42) -137%	45.7 ?(20.5, 25.2) -34%
Response Time Black / White *	17 ?(7, 10)	2 ?(1, 1) 88%	20.9 ?(11.2, 9.7) -23%	8 ?(1, 7) 53%	2 ?(1, 1) 88%	47.2 ?(20.6, 26.6) -178%	19.7 ?(7.4, 12.3) -16%
PWM Frequency	26 ?(10)	227 ?(50) 773%				14880 ?(100, 500) 57131%
Screen		-61%	-96%	-14%	195%	4932%	-48%
Brightness middle	448	370 -17%	279.4 -38%	504 13%	412 -8%	504 13%	366 -18%
Brightness	436	371 -15%	257 -41%	465 7%	412 -6%	487 12%	347 -20%
Brightness Distribution	93	98 5%	81 -13%	87 -6%	98 5%	94 1%	89 -4%
Black Level *	0.35		0.18 49%	0.35 -0%	0.015 96%	0.001 100%	0.32 9%
Contrast	1280		1552 21%	1440 13%	27467 2046%	504000 39275%	1144 -11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.6	2.77 -73%	5.12 -220%	1.83 -14%	2.34 -46%	1.5 6%	2.82 -76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.44	4.08 8%	19.42 -337%	5.51 -24%	3.34 25%	3.3 26%	4.65 -5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.64	2.83 -342%	1.84 -188%	1.34 -109%	2.95 -361%		2.69 -320%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.78	2.58 7%	5.5 -98%	3.02 -9%	2.78 -0%	2.1 24%	2.3 17%
CCT	6582 ^99%	6241 ^104%	6407 ^101%	6688 ^97%	6879 ^94%	6882 ^94%	6796 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	2.43
Gamma		2.46 ^89%	2.22 ^99%	2.39 ^92%	2.5 ^88%	2.25 ^98%	1.971 ^112%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		99% / 50%	-46% / -70%	30% / 8%	108% / 146%	7968% / 6884%	-14% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

即使华为将其宣传为专业显示器，该面板也不是绝对适合摄影师和视频创作者，因为它只几乎完全覆盖了较小的sRGB色彩空间。AdobeRGB和DisplayP3色彩空间的再现率只有65%左右。

即使MateBook在交付状态下明显错过了宣传的ΔΕ<1，但测量的平均色彩偏差非常低，ΔΕ为1.6。我们的ICC配置文件将进一步下降到明显低于1。华为也包括它自己的颜色配置文件，尽管在交付状态下没有激活。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

26 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 26 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 26 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

如果亮度调得很低，我们注意到显示屏在26赫兹时有轻微闪烁。亮度的变化是最小的，几乎不能被我们的传感器所测量。由于其振幅和频率较低，这可能更多是由于背景照明中的一些电子噪声，而不是脉冲宽度调制（PWM）。

尽管有反光的玻璃表面，但只要不在阳光直射下，显示屏在户外也能轻松阅读。即使反射清晰可见，430cd/m²的亮度和高对比度使显示屏在户外也能使用。然而，你不应该把笔记本电脑放在阳光直射下太久，因为铝制外壳会很快发热。

作为典型的IPS面板，即使是陡峭的视角也不会造成任何问题，只有亮度水平随着视角的增加而下降。

业绩

华为MateBook 16s目前只有在我们测试的配置中配备了英特尔酷睿i9-13900H，16GB DDR5内存，和1TB NVMe SSD。特别是考虑到强大的i9处理器，这里的工作内存量似乎有点紧张。由于这款笔记本电脑没有提供专用的GPU，它依靠的是英特尔Iris Xe与Core i9中的96个EUs。

测试条件和功率调整

华为提供了两种预设的省电模式，可以使用华为的控制台进行选择。在电源模式下，英特尔酷睿i9可以在115瓦的情况下短暂运行，在提升阶段后仍有60瓦的功率。平衡性能模式仍然分别提供95瓦和45瓦的功率。在电池运行中，酷睿i9的功耗在35至40瓦之间。
除了霍格沃茨遗产基准测试外，所有的测试都是在平衡性能模式下运行的。

处理器

的英特尔酷睿i9-13900H属于英特尔目前第13代最强大的处理器，但H系列更像是桤木湖一代的刷新。华为MateBook中的处理器运行功率高达115瓦，这确保了在所有基准测试中的强大结果，使华为笔记本电脑跃居比较领域的首位。

这并不令人惊讶，因为否则你会发现i9更多出现在工作站和游戏笔记本中。在薄型多媒体笔记本电脑中看到它是相当罕见的。华为还为这款强大的处理器配备了强大的冷却系统，使其大部分时间都能在最高80℃（176°F）的温度下运行。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2518 (2463.05-2968.46)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1906 (1816.37-2350.45)

Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø1298 (1272.02-1735.28)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2194 (2130.95-2446.31)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P: Ø1457 (1291.45-1828.74)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max: Ø2074 (2068.47-2081.27)

LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1029 (774.98-1497.06)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	85.5 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max ^-6! Apple M2 Max	78.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	78.6 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	72.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia	71.4 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	67.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	62.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	60.2 pt
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	48.4 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	17754 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28)	16813 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)	15387 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	14767 Points -17%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	14555 Points -18%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	14099 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	11181 Points -37%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	10252 (8193.94^min - 10252.5^max) Points -42%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	7857 Points -56%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	2037 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	1891 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26)	1887 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	1825 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)	1757 Points -14%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	1739 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	1719 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	1625 Points -20%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	1591 Points -22%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	6808 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25)	6533 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)	5683 Points -17%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	5551 Points -18%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	5310 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	4517 Points -34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	4044 Points -41%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	3907 Points -43%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	3259 Points -52%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	784 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	720 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25)	720 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	708 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	670 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	653 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)	652 Points -17%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	607 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	460 Points -41%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	2968 (2463.05^min - 2968.46^max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26)	2676 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	2446 Points -18%
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)	2435 Points -18%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	2350 (1816.37^min - 2350.45^max) Points -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	2074 (2068.47^min, 2068.57^P1 - 2081.27^max) Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	1828 Points -38%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	1735 (1272.02^min - 1735.28^max) Points -42%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	1497 (774.98^min - 1497.06^max) Points -50%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	293 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26)	269 Points -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	260 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	257 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)	257 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	252 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	239 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	238 Points -19%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	223 Points -24%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	459 Seconds * -142%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	349 Seconds * -84%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	290 Seconds * -53%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	255 Seconds * -34%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)	253 Seconds * -33%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	227 Seconds * -19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24)	205 Seconds * -8%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	190 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	70860 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25)	66435 MIPS -6%
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)	60265 MIPS -15%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	54857 MIPS -23%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	48332 MIPS -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	46027 MIPS -35%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	40711 MIPS -43%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	29646 MIPS -58%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	6533 MIPS
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	6148 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25)	6054 MIPS -7%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)	5722 MIPS -12%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	5651 MIPS -14%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	5590 MIPS -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	5294 MIPS -19%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	5158 MIPS -21%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	15348 Points +11%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	13768 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26)	12649 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)	11967 Points -13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	11831 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	10439 Points -24%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	9159 Points -33%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	9013 Points -35%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	8346 Points -39%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	2003 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	1978 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26)	1895 Points -5%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	1861 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)	1818 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	1751 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	1714 Points -14%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	1683 Points -16%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	1650 Points -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	19.4 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)	18.5 fps -5%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)	16.4 fps -15%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	15.7 fps -19%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	15.3 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	12.8 fps -34%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	10.6 fps -45%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	7.95 fps -59%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	54.9 s * -35%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)	49.6 s * -22%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)	47.6 s * -17%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	47.4 s * -16%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	45.3 s * -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	42 s * -3%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	40.8 s *
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	40.7 s * -0%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P	0.538 sec * -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P	0.502 sec * -22%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4873 sec * -18%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.484 sec * -17%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U	0.4593 sec * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)	0.4493 sec * -9%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4426 sec * -7%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4131 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2968 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

107.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

293 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6808 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

784 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2037 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

17754 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	98.7 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	92.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia	86.7 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	81.4 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	80.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	67.4 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	55.5 pt
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	15712 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25)	15135 KRay/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)	14429 KRay/s -8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	14390 KRay/s -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	13289 KRay/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	8507 KRay/s -46%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7486 KRay/s -52%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6680 KRay/s -57%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	78309 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25)	76236 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	72920 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)	72714 Points -7%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66971 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	49719 Points -37%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40675 Points -48%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	26989 Points -66%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3653 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25)	3561 MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)	3389 MB/s -7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	3375 MB/s -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3059 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	2552 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2179 MB/s -40%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1404 MB/s -62%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	120936 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25)	105169 Points -13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	102497 Points -15%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	102438 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)	90849 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	80139 Points -34%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	73671 Points -39%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66277 Points -45%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	10143 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25)	9675 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)	9329 Points -8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	8932 Points -12%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8586 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	6671 Points -34%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5113 Points -50%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4692 Points -54%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38706 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25)	37712 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)	36169 Points -7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	35011 Points -10%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	33244 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	24409 Points -37%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	19985 Points -48%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	13175 Points -66%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	134355 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	91493 MB/s -32%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25)	87238 MB/s -35%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)	75995 MB/s -43%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	65858 MB/s -51%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62143 MB/s -54%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42670 MB/s -68%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	31136 MB/s -77%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25)	1040 MB/s +2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1022 MB/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	940 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)	935 MB/s -9%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	870 MB/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	755 MB/s -26%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	684 MB/s -33%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	441 MB/s -57%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8275 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25)	8215 KRay/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)	7836 KRay/s -5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7629 KRay/s -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7221 KRay/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	4204 KRay/s -49%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4016 KRay/s -51%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3711 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	45880 MPixel/s +12%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42678 MPixel/s +4%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41574 MPixel/s +2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40864 MPixel/s
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)	40459 MPixel/s -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40107 MPixel/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25)	39722 MPixel/s -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	13699 MPixel/s -66%

系统性能

在我们的对比设备中，只有VivoBook Pro 16在PCMark 10的测试中达到了较高的总分值。但VivoBook也能够使用dGPU，因此在生产力和数字内容创作领域达到明显更高的结果。
在CrossMark中，图形芯片的性能发挥的作用要小得多，MateBook 16s变成了对比设备中最强大的。
因此，只要你不要求笔记本执行任何对图形要求高的任务，华为笔记本就能够提供一个优秀的系统性能。一个小的负面因素仍然是工作内存的数量，16GB的内存有点紧张。在处理大量数据时，这大大减慢了笔记本电脑的性能。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6795 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	6652 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	6406 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5944 - 6802, n=8)	6328 Points -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6192 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	5933 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	5576 Points -13%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5251 Points -18%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	11822 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	11774 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10347 - 12286, n=8)	11372 Points -3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10937 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	10598 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10521 Points -11%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9845 Points -16%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	9540 Points -19%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	9016 Points +20%
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8932 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7319 - 8526, n=8)	7782 Points +4%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7624 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	7505 Points
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	7197 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	6718 Points -10%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6618 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	9288 Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9202 Points +14%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	8073 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7527 - 8155, n=8)	7774 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7727 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	6663 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	6608 Points -18%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6031 Points -25%

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2146 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z	1910 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1766 - 2146, n=7)	1902 Points -11%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1868 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)	1703 Points -21%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1683 Points -22%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1623 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1579 Points -26%

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2064 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1684 - 2064, n=7)	1824 Points -12%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1787 Points -13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1669 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z	1618 Points -22%
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)	1616 Points -22%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1595 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1532 Points -26%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z	2505 Points +13%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2224 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1789 - 2224, n=7)	2029 Points -9%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2009 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)	1909 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1727 Points -22%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1699 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1652 Points -26%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2171 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1474 - 2171, n=7)	1794 Points -17%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1715 Points -21%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1677 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1511 Points -30%
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)	1435 Points -34%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1418 Points -35%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z	1395 Points -36%

PCMark 10 Score		6406 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	69724 MB/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	69103 MB/s +8%
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)	68580 MB/s +7%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	63839 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62918 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=25)	61864 MB/s -3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	61697 MB/s -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	25615 MB/s -60%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)	69599 MB/s +14%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65463 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=25)	62438 MB/s +3%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	60901 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	60597 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58380 MB/s -4%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58209 MB/s -4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	25586 MB/s -58%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	88993 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	77448 MB/s +10%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	70522 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)	69752 MB/s -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	69264 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=25)	65109 MB/s -8%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	63333 MB/s -10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	23679 MB/s -66%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	107.4 ns * -22%
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)	106.6 ns * -21%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	95.5 ns * -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	95.4 ns * -8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	91.1 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (75.8 - 102.3, n=25)	89.3 ns * -1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	88.3 ns *
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	88 ns * -0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

DPC延迟仍然是装有Windows 11的笔记本电脑的致命弱点。MateBook在这里也无法用其目前的驱动程序集进行令人信服的表现，LatencyMon的结论是，实时应用程序，如音频和视频处理可能会成为笔记本电脑的问题。

在YouTube上播放4K 60Hz视频时，高延迟也变得很明显，在我们的测试视频中，有7个帧被丢掉。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2645.7 μs * -16%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2290 μs *
LG Gram 16Z90Q Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1728.6 μs * +25%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1573.4 μs * +31%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	877 μs * +62%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	370.2 μs * +84%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

虽然华为在这里使用的是无名的NVMe固态硬盘，但它以非常好的传输率和短的访问时间而大放异彩。在较长的时间内，传输率也保持在一个较高的水平。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

321JN1024GB-TX01

Sequential Read: 4093.46MB/s

Sequential Write: 3147.93MB/s

4K Read: 98.45MB/s

4K Write: 316.53MB/s

4K-64 Read: 2437.31MB/s

4K-64 Write: 2989.61MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.074ms

Access Time Write: 0.054ms

Copy ISO: 2546.01MB/s

Copy Program: 1133MB/s

Copy Game: 2120.09MB/s

Score Read: 2945Points

Score Write: 3621Points

Score Total: 8041Points

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01	90.1 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	89 pt
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	67.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia	65.3 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	65.1 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	56.8 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	54.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	51.6 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3344 (3296.51^min - 3343.89^max) MB/s +35%
Average of class Multimedia (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)	2970 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	2942 (2917.56^min - 2942.08^max) MB/s +19%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2669 (2638.39^min - 2668.53^max) MB/s +8%
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (2471 - 2550, n=2)	2511 MB/s +2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	2471 (2378.24^min - 2470.54^max) MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2317 (2303.3^min - 2316.74^max) MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1639 (1605.72^min - 1638.79^max) MB/s -34%
seq write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	3932 (3910.5^min - 3931.84^max) MB/s
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (3877 - 3932, n=2)	3905 MB/s -1%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3330 (3199.21^min - 3329.86^max) MB/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)	3092 MB/s -21%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3058 (2997.76^min - 3057.65^max) MB/s -22%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	3054 (3027.48^min - 3054.47^max) MB/s -22%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2292 (2277.15^min - 2292.43^max) MB/s -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1633 (1589.22^min - 1633.47^max) MB/s -58%
seq q8 t1 read
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6334 (5516.35^min - 6334.24^max) MB/s +29%
Average of class Multimedia (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)	5486 MB/s +12%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	4947 (4060.3^min - 4947.18^max) MB/s +1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	4908 (4437.72^min - 4908.21^max) MB/s
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (4899 - 4908, n=2)	4904 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4513 (3871.13^min - 4512.65^max) MB/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	3945 (2427.42^min - 3944.82^max) MB/s -20%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	3034 (2688.83^min - 3034.37^max) MB/s -38%
seq q8 t1 write
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4969 (4938.39^min - 4968.78^max) MB/s +26%
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)	4169 MB/s +6%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	3942 (3931.01^min - 3941.68^max) MB/s
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (3880 - 3942, n=2)	3911 MB/s -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3574 (3515.97^min - 3573.95^max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	3548 (3383.07^min - 3547.61^max) MB/s -10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2514 (2483.93^min - 2513.65^max) MB/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1821 (1636.07^min - 1820.67^max) MB/s -54%
4k q1 t1 read
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	84.7 (83.57^min - 84.65^max) MB/s +9%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	77.5 (74.89^min - 77.46^max) MB/s
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (77.3 - 77.5, n=2)	77.4 MB/s 0%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	75.2 (74.59^min - 75.15^max) MB/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	74.3 (62.98^min - 74.29^max) MB/s -4%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	71.3 (68.49^min - 71.32^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)	62.9 MB/s -19%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	37.1 (36.31^min - 37.14^max) MB/s -52%
4k q1 t1 write
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (376 - 378, n=2)	377 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	376 (372.19^min - 376.19^max) MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	277 (271.48^min - 277.03^max) MB/s -26%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	265 (263.14^min - 265.39^max) MB/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	246 (239.52^min - 246.23^max) MB/s -35%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)	170.9 MB/s -55%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	151.3 (143.2^min - 151.32^max) MB/s -60%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	128.6 (118.68^min - 128.63^max) MB/s -66%
4k q32 t16 read
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	2938 (2929.68^min - 2937.5^max) MB/s
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (2928 - 2938, n=2)	2933 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)	1357 MB/s -54%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1171 (1165.75^min - 1170.99^max) MB/s -60%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1000 (980.97^min - 999.75^max) MB/s -66%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	932 (902.95^min - 931.73^max) MB/s -68%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	795 (763.75^min - 794.53^max) MB/s -73%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	674 (562.61^min - 674.25^max) MB/s -77%
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	3754 (3732.05^min - 3753.87^max) MB/s
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (3115 - 3754, n=2)	3435 MB/s -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2194 (1844.86^min - 2194.33^max) MB/s -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1392 (1180.35^min - 1391.84^max) MB/s -63%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1299 (1149.78^min - 1298.86^max) MB/s -65%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)	1025 MB/s -73%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	423 (381.07^min - 423.49^max) MB/s -89%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	358 (295.51^min - 357.67^max) MB/s -90%

AS SSD
Score Total
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	8041 Points
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (7876 - 8041, n=2)	7959 Points -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6406 Points -20%
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5061 Points -37%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4597 Points -43%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	3865 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	3704 Points -54%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	3450 Points -57%
Score Read
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	2945 Points
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (2885 - 2945, n=2)	2915 Points -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2413 Points -18%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1630 Points -45%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1263 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1263 Points -57%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1255 Points -57%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1172 Points -60%
Score Write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	3621 Points
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (3532 - 3621, n=2)	3577 Points -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2796 Points -23%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2762 Points -24%
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2660 Points -27%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	2034 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1841 Points -49%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1684 Points -53%
Seq Read
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4709.53 MB/s +15%
Average of class Multimedia (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4248 MB/s +4%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	4139.39 MB/s +1%
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (4093 - 4105, n=2)	4099 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	4093.46 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3940.4 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	2986.81 MB/s -27%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2786.1 MB/s -32%
Seq Write
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (3148 - 3445, n=2)	3296 MB/s +5%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3155.67 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	3147.93 MB/s
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2827.84 MB/s -10%
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2749 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	2462.4 MB/s -22%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2188.43 MB/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1617.55 MB/s -49%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	98.45 MB/s
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (97.4 - 98.5, n=2)	97.9 MB/s -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	75.84 MB/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	74.26 MB/s -25%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	70.37 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	63.93 MB/s -35%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)	61.6 MB/s -37%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	58.13 MB/s -41%
4K Write
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (317 - 328, n=2)	322 MB/s +2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	316.53 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	224.86 MB/s -29%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	221.6 MB/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	215.44 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	205.1 MB/s -35%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	190.3 MB/s -40%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	168.67 MB/s -47%
4K-64 Read
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	2437.31 MB/s
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (2377 - 2437, n=2)	2407 MB/s -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1961.03 MB/s -20%
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1144 MB/s -53%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	889.77 MB/s -63%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	817.72 MB/s -66%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	777.37 MB/s -68%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	721.3 MB/s -70%
4K-64 Write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	2989.61 MB/s
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (2859 - 2990, n=2)	2924 MB/s -2%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2310.31 MB/s -23%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2255.47 MB/s -25%
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2195 MB/s -27%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	1582.9 MB/s -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	1463.63 MB/s -51%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1243.09 MB/s -58%
Access Time Read
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	0.104 ms * -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	0.103 ms * -39%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	0.078 ms * -5%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	0.074 ms *
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.074 ms * -0%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.0551 ms * +26%
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (0.029 - 0.074, n=2)	0.0515 ms * +30%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.031 ms * +58%
Access Time Write
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.136 ms * -152%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	0.064 ms * -19%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.06104 ms * -13%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	0.054 ms *
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01 (0.031 - 0.054, n=2)	0.0425 ms * +21%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	0.028 ms * +48%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.024 ms * +56%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	0.019 ms * +65%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01: Ø4896 (4216.79-4912.37)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4432 (3774.46-4479.31)

Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101: Ø4933 (4129.92-4955.57)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ: Ø3315 (2957.78-3377.46)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G: Ø3951 (3430.73-3970.54)

LG Gram 16Z90Q Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø4778 (3285.19-5966.82)

图形卡

由于快速的工作内存和高TDP，iGPU能够在MateBook 16s中提供相对较高的性能。在几乎所有的基准测试中，这台中国笔记本电脑的表现至少比英特尔Iris Xe的平均水平高出20%。英特尔Iris Xe 96 EUs这是与Core i9一起出现的。MateBook 16s没有另一个图形选项，除非你想考虑外部图形卡。
然而，它也应该清楚，即使是入门级的GPU，如 RTX 3050在这里处于更高的水平，提供至少两倍的性能。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	92 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	88.3 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	37.7 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	34.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 ^-1! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	33.2 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.2 pt
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	31.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	28.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)	20075 Points +169%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	16509 Points +121%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	7471 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	7243 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	6430 Points -14%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202)	6353 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	6225 Points -17%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	5925 Points -21%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	83553 Points +168%
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)	56887 Points +82%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	31190 Points
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	27636 Points -11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13162 - 38578, n=180)	26508 Points -15%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	25452 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	18764 Points -40%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)	14437 Points +135%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	12449 Points +103%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	6143 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	5610 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	5419 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	5127 Points -17%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	5014 Points -18%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6482, n=215)	4920 Points -20%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)	5446 Points +198%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	4611 Points +152%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1829 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	1787 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	1628 Points -11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=212)	1495 Points -18%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	1481 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	1445 Points -21%

3DMark 11 Performance		8283 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		101739 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		26502 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5770 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		2087 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	53 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=45, last 2 years)	42.7 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	93 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=46, last 2 years)	74.5 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	851 Seconds * -153%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=101)	696 Seconds * -107%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U	664 Seconds * -98%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P	559 Seconds * -66%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	452 Seconds * -35%
Average of class Multimedia (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years)	430 Seconds * -28%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	379 Seconds * -13%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	336 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在这一点上，即使是英特尔的iGPU也能在目前的游戏中提供相当可容忍的帧率，只要你在质量设置上做出一些妥协。例如，《霍格沃茨传奇》和《F1 2022》等游戏在最低质量设置下以全高清分辨率顺利运行。但你不能指望从英特尔Iris Xe.那些需要更高的游戏性能的人应该看看带有专用GPU的笔记本电脑，如华硕VivoBook Pro 16.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	95.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia	94.7 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 ^-1! Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	42.7 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 ^-1! Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	36.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 ^-1! Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	28.7 pt
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)	54 fps +198%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	47.1 (39^min) fps +160%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.1 (10.9^min) fps
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.3 fps -4%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	15.6 (14^min) fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	14.4 (12^min) fps -20%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	13.2 (10^min) fps -27%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	53.8 (30.1^min, 38.5^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)	53.5 fps
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.9 (2.26^min, 6.17^P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.5 (4.53^min, 6.29^P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	10.2 (0.768^min, 6.33^P1) fps
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	7.71 (3.18^min, 4.61^P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +160%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	46.2 fps +136%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	19.6 fps
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.7 fps -10%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.5 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	13.3 fps -32%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.9 fps -39%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)	87.4 fps +197%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	84.5 (48.3^min, 64.9^P1) fps +187%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	29.4 (5.6^min, 10.2^P1) fps
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.7 (5.6^min, 9.49^P1) fps -2%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.4 (5^min, 5^P1) fps -41%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	101.6 (87.6^min) fps +44%
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)	96.4 fps +36%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	70.8 (64^min) fps
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	61.7 (53.9^min) fps -13%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	59.8 (50.7^min) fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	44.9 (40^min) fps -37%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	42.5 (33.1^min) fps -40%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	90.5 fps +163%
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)	66.8 fps +94%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.1 fps +17%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	38.5 fps +12%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	34.4 fps
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	34.3 fps 0%
LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	29.2 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	25.1 fps -27%

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years)	100.8 fps +294%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU	83 fps +224%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.6 - 45.9, n=189)	28.7 fps +12%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.6 fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU	76 fps +320%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)	54 fps +198%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.1 (10.9^min) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.79 - 20.1, n=179)	14 fps -23%

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

No graph data

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	152.1	134.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)			25.6	18.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	142.2	103.1	77.9	70.8		30
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	50.2	27.7	19.6		14.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	54.2	35.5	34.3			26.4
Strange Brigade (2018)	107.3	46.6	36.7	29.4
F1 22 (2022)	55.1	49.6	35.5	27.1
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	35.4	18.4	11.9

排放

噪声水平

华为为MateBook 16s配备了两个直径为75毫米（约3英寸）的风扇。尽管笔记本电脑并不是低声的，但在大多数时候是可以忍受的。笔记本电脑在平衡性能模式下明显更安静，在该模式下几乎听不到设备的声音。不幸的是，华为笔记本电脑缺乏静音模式。

Noise Level

Idle		25.7 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A)
Load		45.3 / 45.6 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A)

	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z	LG Gram 16Z90Q Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise		1%	10%	-5%	1%	12%	7%
off / environment *	25.7	25.7 -0%	22.8 11%	25.2 2%	25.2 2%	23.9 7%	25 3%
Idle Minimum *	25.7	26.1 -2%	22.9 11%	25.2 2%	25.2 2%	23.9 7%	26 -1%
Idle Average *	28.4	26.1 8%	22.9 19%	25.2 11%	25.2 11%	23.9 16%	27 5%
Idle Maximum *	28.4	27.2 4%	26.9 5%	25.2 11%	29.3 -3%	23.9 16%	28 1%
Load Average *	45.3	44.2 2%	41.7 8%	55.1 -22%	46.4 -2%	36.6 19%	38 16%
Load Maximum *	45.6	47.5 -4%	43.6 4%	61.5 -35%	46.4 -2%	43.2 5%	38 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *			41.5			35.1	37

* ... smaller is better

温度

华为的冷却概念并不仅仅依靠吹出热空气。在两个散热器之间，冷空气也被吸入机箱，这应该是为了提供额外的冷却。在我们的热图中，这种效果在负载下清晰可见。
不幸的是，这并没有降低笔记本电脑其他表面的温度。特别是在键盘的中心，我们在压力测试后测得的温度高得令人不舒服，达到43℃（109℉）。

Max. Load

Idle


36.9 °C	40.8 °C	35.2 °C
30.5 °C	43.2 °C	30.7 °C
30.4 °C	29.8 °C	29.8 °C

Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 34.1 °C


35.2 °C	44.7 °C	32.8 °C
33.6 °C	35.2 °C	31.5 °C
31.4 °C	32.4 °C	30.1 °C

Maximum: 44.7 °C
Average: 34.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 53.3 °C | Room Temperature 23.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).

	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU	LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat		-4%	7%	-12%	-2%	15%	8%
Maximum Upper Side *	43.2	44.4 -3%	37.6 13%	44.2 -2%	41.6 4%	44.2 -2%	45 -4%
Maximum Bottom *	44.7	48 -7%	40 11%	53 -19%	45 -1%	42.9 4%	43 4%
Idle Upper Side *	32.1	31.9 1%	30.4 5%	32.1 -0%	31 3%	22.4 30%	26 19%
Idle Bottom *	30.1	31.9 -6%	30.6 -2%	38.4 -28%	33.6 -12%	22.3 26%	26 14%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在用Prime95和FurMark进行的长达一小时的压力测试中，MateBook能够证明其冷却概念正在发挥作用。在短暂的提升阶段后，CPU和iGPU能够保持稳定的性能。在这段时间里， i9-13900H大部分时间保持在70℃（158°F）左右的舒适区。

发言人

在这里，我们终于看到了华为MateBook 16s的亮点。在其他笔记本电脑听起来平淡无奇的地方，MateBook提供了一个圆形的声音。那些正在寻找具有良好的扬声器的笔记本电脑的人将在这款华为笔记本电脑中找到它们。我们能够听到饱和的低音和清晰的高音。华为的控制台还允许你根据自己的喜好调整声音。对于那些笔记本电脑中体面的扬声器仍然不够的人，还可以使用音频端口或蓝牙连接外部设备。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理

消耗功率

在低负荷下，华为MateBook 16s的效率相对较高。然而，在中度和高度负荷下，大量的电力提供给英特尔酷睿i9-13900H.虽然这让处理器显示了它的实力，但笔记本电脑也消耗了相应的电量，最终大大高于同类平均水平。但是，直接对比 Apple MacBook Pro 16也表明，华为的笔记本电脑仍然明显更有效率。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 1.3 Watt
Idle	5.8 / 7.7 / 10.6 Watt
Load	76.9 / 118 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 2560x1680, 16"	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"	LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		20%	22%	-56%	35%	-42%	20%	16%	-16%
Idle Minimum *	5.8	5.8 -0%	3.3 43%	8.7 -50%	3.9 33%	5.2 10%	5 14%	5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193) 8%	6.78 ?(2.17 - 21.1, n=86, last 2 years) -17%
Idle Average *	7.7	6 22%	10.2 -32%	13.1 -70%	4.8 38%	16.5 -114%	8 -4%	8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193) -11%	11.3 ?(4.6 - 30, n=86, last 2 years) -47%
Idle Maximum *	10.6	6.9 35%	10.3 3%	18.3 -73%	10 6%	16.8 -58%	14 -32%	10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193) -2%	13.4 ?(5.6 - 30.4, n=86, last 2 years) -26%
Load Average *	76.9	59 23%	55.2 28%	116 -51%	44 43%	113 -47%	47 39%	45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193) 41%	71.1 ?(14.3 - 147, n=84, last 2 years) 8%
Witcher 3 ultra *	76.7	61.1 20%	43.8 43%	117.6 -53%	42.3 45%	92 -20%	37.8 51%
Load Maximum *	118	92 22%	65.7 44%	162 -37%	63 47%	145 -23%	56 53%	67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193) 43%	117.3 ?(47.7 - 270, n=85, last 2 years) 1%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Huawei MateBook 16s i9; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø76.7 (71.3-118)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø96.1 (88.4-118.8)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.34 (8.64-11.1)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

Huawei MateBook 16s i9; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø74 (71.4-80.4)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.05 (0.92-15.8)

电池寿命

在我们现实的WiFi网络冲浪测试中，华为的多媒体笔记本电脑在离开插座的情况下持续了整整13小时。在全显示亮度的负载下，它仍然超过两个小时。凭借这一点，尽管MateBook在我们的比较领域拥有最强大的处理器，但它的持续时间明显比大多数竞争对手长。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		13h 07min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 22min

	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 84 Wh	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 65 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 71 Wh	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 76 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-28%	-21%	-45%	-19%	-21%	-6%	-26%
WiFi v1.3	787	467.7 -41%	566 -28%	435 -45%	613 -22%	887 13%	606 -23%	625 ?(279 - 1204, n=85, last 2 years) -21%
Load	142	121 -15%	124 -13%		119 -16%	66 -54%	157 11%	97.8 ?(39 - 212, n=64, last 2 years) -31%
Reader / Idle			1138		1821		1085	1168 ?(612 - 2760, n=17, last 2 years)
H.264					861	1124		821 ?(319 - 1481, n=52, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 铝制外壳

+ 3:2格式的明亮显示屏

+ 强大的英特尔酷睿i9

+ 良好的声音

Cons

- 只有16GB的焊接工作存储器

- 非常温暖的表面

- 没有静音模式

判决书

通过MateBook 16s，华为提供了一台坚实的笔记本电脑，只有很少的理由让人抱怨。如果我们想在高层次上提出批评，我们可以提到焊接的工作存储器，不到100%的sRGB色彩空间覆盖率，以及反射的显示表面。这款笔记本电脑的外壳质量、性能、键盘和扬声器都很好。最多，我们会希望有更多工作内存和dGPU的版本。

华为MateBook 16s是MacBook Pro的强大替代品，来自Apple 。中国笔记本电脑只在少数领域被超越。

然而，16英寸笔记本电脑之间的竞争是广泛的，有几个强大的替代品值得一看。比如说 Acer Swift Go SFG16-71和三星Galaxy Book3 Pro提供了一个明显更好的OLED显示屏，具有更高的对比度和更多的可重现的色彩。那些正在寻找一个尽可能轻的16英寸笔记本电脑的人，不会绕过 LG Gram 16.而由于其dGPU，华硕的华硕的VivoBook Pro 16在几个方面也明显更强大。

价格和可用性

除了在德国，MateBook 16s可以从制造商那里以1800欧元的价格买到，或者从亚马逊买到，这款笔记本电脑似乎只能从国际或中国供应商的易拉宝等处买到。

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 - 06/14/2023 v7 ^(old)
Marc Herter

Chassis

86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

89%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

56 / 80 → 70%

Weight

63 / 20-72 → 83%

Battery

90 / 95 → 94%

Display

88%

Games Performance

72 / 90 → 80%

Application Performance

97 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

90%

Noise

82 / 95 → 86%

Audio

84%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Average

79%

86%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为MateBook 16s 2023评测 - 多媒体笔记本电脑现在有了更明亮的3:2显示屏

Marc Herter, 2023-06-15 (Update: 2023-06-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例

尺寸比较

装备

沟通

网络摄像头

安全问题

辅料

维护

担保

输入设备

键盘

触摸板

触摸屏

显示

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

业绩

测试条件和功率调整

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储解决方案

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放

噪声水平

温度

压力测试

发言人

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

电源管理

消耗功率

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption With External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

判决书

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison