华为MateBook 16s 2023评测 - 多媒体笔记本电脑现在有了更明亮的3:2显示屏
作为最大的网络设备和移动电子产品制造商之一,华为向消费者提供智能手机、平板电脑、智能手表和笔记本电脑。虽然该制造商的Android 设备在西方世界主要受阻于美国的制裁,但华为的个人电脑和笔记本电脑并没有受到类似的限制。它们配备了当前的Windows版本和英特尔或AMD的强大处理器。我们的测试装置包含一个英特尔酷睿i9-13900H,华为将其安置在一个由铝和玻璃制成的优雅外壳中。华为MateBook 16s主要以全面的声音给我们带来惊喜。除了Apple ,我们已经很久没有在测试中遇到声音这么好的笔记本电脑了。
3:2格式的IPS面板,2.5K分辨率,提供了一个体面的图像。此外,还有TÜV Rheinland(德国技术认证机构)颁发的三份证书,分别是色彩准确性、显示器的低蓝光含量和无闪烁。
凭借其轻巧的金属外壳和英特尔酷睿i9,这款16英寸设备是为具有高级品味的客户提供的多媒体笔记本电脑。凭借这一点,华为MateBook s16的直接竞争对手包括联想Yoga 7i ,三星Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 ,还有Apple MacBook Pro 16 。那些寻找明显更轻的笔记本电脑的人可以在LG Gram 16 或17 中找到它。你可以在下面的表格中看到我们对这些竞争对手的测试链接:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 17.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1680 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 20 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
93.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU | 2.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.20" | 3456x2234 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
案例
在MateBook 16s的设计中,华为受到Apple MacBook Pro的启发。但MateBook只是看起来更苗条、更现代。在做工质量方面几乎没有任何弱点。所有部件都紧紧贴合,在试图翘起笔记本时没有任何吱吱作响。显示器很容易移动,可以打开到大约160°的角度。铰链不会因为一些轻微的振动而偏离其位置。不幸的是,键盘已经可以被一些轻度的压力压下去了。 除了按键之外,该设备的所有表面都是由铝或玻璃制成的,这也为多媒体笔记本电脑 提供了高质量的外观。
笔记本电脑的重量约为2公斤(约4.4磅)。除了三星Galaxy Book3和LG Gram 16的轻量级产品外,16英寸笔记本电脑都属于大致相同的重量范围。在厚度方面,竞争对手也相当相似。那些正在寻找真正苗条的16英寸笔记本电脑的人可能需要选择三星设备。
装备
华为MateBook 16s的连接大约符合当前多媒体笔记本电脑的标准。但不幸的是,这里没有SD卡读卡器。两个USB-C端口中只有一个支持ThunderBolt 4,但两个端口都提供DisplayPort和PowerDelivery。通常情况下,两个端口中的一个会被附带的USB-C充电器占据。
沟通
这款笔记本电脑也使用英特尔WiFi AX211作为WiFi模块。虽然它在上升和下载过程中提供了良好的传输速度,但与5GHz无线局域网相比,它在6GHz网络中几乎没有显示任何优势。
网络摄像头
内置全高清摄像头的网络图像提供了相当好的对比度和清晰度。图像质量只在边缘处有最小的下降。然而,由于暗部的最大ΔΕ为24,亮部的最大ΔΕ为19.1,摄像头的颜色偏差相对较高。 MateBook在弱光条件下也很吃力,图像很快就变得有颗粒感和噪音。
稍微不寻常的是内置麦克风的位置,它们被放置在MateBook底座前面用于打开显示屏的小凹槽里。然而,通常情况下,语音质量不会因此而受到负面影响。
安全问题
你可以通过指纹扫描仪登录笔记本电脑。此外,英特尔酷睿i9的安全功能也可以使用。该笔记本电脑还提供TPM 2.0。虽然安全启动是可用的,但默认情况下是停用的。
辅料
除了MateBook和USB-C充电器外,盒子里只包括必须的文件集。但是,如果你直接从华为(在德国)订购笔记本电脑,在本次测试时,你还可以免费得到一个MateView SE显示器、一个背包和一个无线鼠标,这些都是随笔记本电脑一起提供的。
维护
笔记本电脑的底盖由10颗TX5螺丝和几个塑料夹子固定在位。要接触MateBook 16s的电子元件,除了一把螺丝刀和撬动工具外,你不需要其他东西。一个强大的吸盘可能也会使移除塑料夹子更容易。卸下螺丝后,你可以使用撬动工具,从铰链开始,努力松开笔记本电脑周围的夹子。
然而,一旦进入内部,你就没有太多的维修选择了。工作存储器和WLAN模块是焊接在一起的,为了拆下电池,你必须拆下一些额外的螺丝,其中一些被贴纸封住。有帮助的是,你可以拿出两个风扇,而不必拆下整个冷却系统,这使得清洁冷却鳍和风扇变得更加容易。
担保
我们的测试装置是一个评估设备,不用于销售,所以没有保修。一般来说,华为在欧盟为其笔记本电脑的显示屏、主板、键盘、电池和充电器提供24个月的保修。
输入设备
拥有16英寸显示屏的笔记本电脑通常也提供全尺寸键盘。然而,由于华为在这里遵循Apple's MacBook的设计,它放弃了数字块。除了键盘和ClickPad之外,MateBook 16s还包括一个触摸屏。
键盘
华为笔记本电脑的键盘提供了一个背景照明和1.5毫米的键程。再加上清晰可见的压力点,这导致了舒适的触觉。作为一个小的特殊功能,华为在F6和F7键之间的顶部键行放置了一个键来启动Windows语音输入。键盘布局与欧洲标准一致(在德国)。
触摸板
由于其哑光玻璃表面,大的14×9厘米(约5.5×3.5英寸)ClickPad应该能够长时间保持其舒适的触觉。它对最多五个手指的输入作出反应,其手掌识别效果良好。
触摸屏
由于其反射表面,MateBook 16s的触摸屏更像是一个指纹磁铁。显示器对多达十个手指的输入没有任何延迟的反应。然而,这种表面可以使手指更容易滑动。
显示
华为MateBook 16s的3:2显示屏的分辨率为2,560 × 1,680像素。在反光玻璃后面,你可以找到一个对比度丰富的IPS面板。该显示屏拥有德国认证机构TÜV Rheinland的三项不同认证,应该是低蓝光排放,无闪烁,并提供准确的色彩。华为宣传它的对比度为1.500:1,100%的sRGB色彩空间覆盖率,交付状态下的色彩精确度为ΔE<1。在我们的测量中,这台笔记本电脑错过了所有这三个数值,但差距不大。我们看到的仍然是一个良好而明亮的显示屏,亮度为435.9cd/m²。我们几乎没有发现亮度分布中的任何缺陷。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 448 cd/m²
Contrast: 1280:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.64
ΔE Greyscale 2.78 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
2.43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, 2560x1680, 16" | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Au Optronics B160QAN02.L, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" | LG Gram 16Z90Q LG LP160WQ1-SPB2 (LGD06EB), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 39% | -33% | 31% | 37% | 33% | 30% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63 | 99.91 59% | 42 -33% | 98.5 56% | 99.7 58% | 99 57% | 96.8 54% |
sRGB Coverage | 94.9 | 100 5% | 62.8 -34% | 99.9 5% | 100 5% | 100 5% | 99.9 5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.1 | 98.87 52% | 43.5 -33% | 86.1 32% | 97 49% | 88.5 36% | 84.6 30% |
Response Times | 318% | -9% | 74% | 91% | 18939% | -25% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 2 ? 94% | 31.8 ? 6% | 2 ? 94% | 2 ? 94% | 80.5 ? -137% | 45.7 ? -34% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17 ? | 2 ? 88% | 20.9 ? -23% | 8 ? 53% | 2 ? 88% | 47.2 ? -178% | 19.7 ? -16% |
PWM Frequency | 26 ? | 227 ? 773% | 14880 ? 57131% | ||||
Screen | -61% | -96% | -14% | 195% | 4932% | -48% | |
Brightness middle | 448 | 370 -17% | 279.4 -38% | 504 13% | 412 -8% | 504 13% | 366 -18% |
Brightness | 436 | 371 -15% | 257 -41% | 465 7% | 412 -6% | 487 12% | 347 -20% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 98 5% | 81 -13% | 87 -6% | 98 5% | 94 1% | 89 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.18 49% | 0.35 -0% | 0.015 96% | 0.001 100% | 0.32 9% | |
Contrast | 1280 | 1552 21% | 1440 13% | 27467 2046% | 504000 39275% | 1144 -11% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.77 -73% | 5.12 -220% | 1.83 -14% | 2.34 -46% | 1.5 6% | 2.82 -76% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.44 | 4.08 8% | 19.42 -337% | 5.51 -24% | 3.34 25% | 3.3 26% | 4.65 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.64 | 2.83 -342% | 1.84 -188% | 1.34 -109% | 2.95 -361% | 2.69 -320% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.78 | 2.58 7% | 5.5 -98% | 3.02 -9% | 2.78 -0% | 2.1 24% | 2.3 17% |
CCT | 6582 99% | 6241 104% | 6407 101% | 6688 97% | 6879 94% | 6882 94% | 6796 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 2.43 | ||||||
Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.22 99% | 2.39 92% | 2.5 88% | 2.25 98% | 1.971 112% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 99% /
50% | -46% /
-70% | 30% /
8% | 108% /
146% | 7968% /
6884% | -14% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
即使华为将其宣传为专业显示器,该面板也不是绝对适合摄影师和视频创作者,因为它只几乎完全覆盖了较小的sRGB色彩空间。AdobeRGB和DisplayP3色彩空间的再现率只有65%左右。
即使MateBook在交付状态下明显错过了宣传的ΔΕ<1,但测量的平均色彩偏差非常低,ΔΕ为1.6。我们的ICC配置文件将进一步下降到明显低于1。华为也包括它自己的颜色配置文件,尽管在交付状态下没有激活。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 26 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
如果亮度调得很低,我们注意到显示屏在26赫兹时有轻微闪烁。亮度的变化是最小的,几乎不能被我们的传感器所测量。由于其振幅和频率较低,这可能更多是由于背景照明中的一些电子噪声,而不是脉冲宽度调制(PWM)。
尽管有反光的玻璃表面,但只要不在阳光直射下,显示屏在户外也能轻松阅读。即使反射清晰可见,430cd/m²的亮度和高对比度使显示屏在户外也能使用。然而,你不应该把笔记本电脑放在阳光直射下太久,因为铝制外壳会很快发热。
作为典型的IPS面板,即使是陡峭的视角也不会造成任何问题,只有亮度水平随着视角的增加而下降。
业绩
华为MateBook 16s目前只有在我们测试的配置中配备了英特尔酷睿i9-13900H,16GB DDR5内存,和1TB NVMe SSD。特别是考虑到强大的i9处理器,这里的工作内存量似乎有点紧张。由于这款笔记本电脑没有提供专用的GPU,它依靠的是 英特尔Iris Xe与Core i9中的96个EUs。
测试条件和功率调整
华为提供了两种预设的省电模式,可以使用华为的控制台进行选择。在电源模式下,英特尔酷睿i9可以在115瓦的情况下短暂运行,在提升阶段后仍有60瓦的功率。平衡性能模式仍然分别提供95瓦和45瓦的功率。在电池运行中,酷睿i9的功耗在35至40瓦之间。
除了霍格沃茨遗产基准测试外,所有的测试都是在平衡性能模式下运行的。
处理器
的英特尔酷睿i9-13900H属于英特尔目前第13代最强大的处理器,但H系列更像是桤木湖一代的刷新。华为MateBook中的处理器运行功率高达115瓦,这确保了在所有基准测试中的强大结果,使华为笔记本电脑跃居比较领域的首位。
这并不令人惊讶,因为否则你会发现i9更多出现在工作站和游戏笔记本中。在薄型多媒体笔记本电脑中看到它是相当罕见的。华为还为这款强大的处理器配备了强大的冷却系统,使其大部分时间都能在最高80℃(176°F)的温度下运行。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max -6! | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
系统性能
在我们的对比设备中,只有VivoBook Pro 16在PCMark 10的测试中达到了较高的总分值。但VivoBook也能够使用dGPU,因此在生产力和数字内容创作领域达到明显更高的结果。
在CrossMark中,图形芯片的性能发挥的作用要小得多,MateBook 16s变成了对比设备中最强大的。
因此,只要你不要求笔记本执行任何对图形要求高的任务,华为笔记本就能够提供一个优秀的系统性能。一个小的负面因素仍然是工作内存的数量,16GB的内存有点紧张。在处理大量数据时,这大大减慢了笔记本电脑的性能。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5944 - 6802, n=8) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10347 - 12286, n=8) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7319 - 8526, n=8) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7527 - 8155, n=8) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1766 - 2146, n=7) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1684 - 2064, n=7) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1789 - 2224, n=7) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1474 - 2171, n=7) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max |
PCMark 10 Score | 6406 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=25) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=25) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (75.8 - 102.3, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
DPC延迟仍然是装有Windows 11的笔记本电脑的致命弱点。MateBook在这里也无法用其目前的驱动程序集进行令人信服的表现,LatencyMon的结论是,实时应用程序,如音频和视频处理可能会成为笔记本电脑的问题。
在YouTube上播放4K 60Hz视频时,高延迟也变得很明显,在我们的测试视频中,有7个帧被丢掉。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
虽然华为在这里使用的是无名的NVMe固态硬盘,但它以非常好的传输率和短的访问时间而大放异彩。在较长的时间内,传输率也保持在一个较高的水平。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
由于快速的工作内存和高TDP,iGPU能够在MateBook 16s中提供相对较高的性能。在几乎所有的基准测试中,这台中国笔记本电脑的表现至少比英特尔Iris Xe的平均水平高出20%。 英特尔Iris Xe 96 EUs这是与Core i9一起出现的。MateBook 16s没有另一个图形选项,除非你想考虑外部图形卡。
然而,它也应该清楚,即使是入门级的GPU,如 RTX 3050在这里处于更高的水平,提供至少两倍的性能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 8283 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 101739 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26502 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5770 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2087 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在这一点上,即使是英特尔的iGPU也能在目前的游戏中提供相当可容忍的帧率,只要你在质量设置上做出一些妥协。例如,《霍格沃茨传奇》和《F1 2022》等游戏在最低质量设置下以全高清分辨率顺利运行。但你不能指望从 英特尔Iris Xe.那些需要更高的游戏性能的人应该看看带有专用GPU的笔记本电脑,如 华硕VivoBook Pro 16.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 -1! | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 -1! | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 -1! | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.6 - 45.9, n=189) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.79 - 20.1, n=179) |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 152.1 | 134.7 | ||||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 25.6 | 18.1 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 142.2 | 103.1 | 77.9 | 70.8 | 30 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 50.2 | 27.7 | 19.6 | 14.7 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 54.2 | 35.5 | 34.3 | 26.4 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 107.3 | 46.6 | 36.7 | 29.4 | ||
F1 22 (2022) | 55.1 | 49.6 | 35.5 | 27.1 | ||
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 35.4 | 18.4 | 11.9 |
排放
噪声水平
华为为MateBook 16s配备了两个直径为75毫米(约3英寸)的风扇。尽管笔记本电脑并不是低声的,但在大多数时候是可以忍受的。笔记本电脑在平衡性能模式下明显更安静,在该模式下几乎听不到设备的声音。不幸的是,华为笔记本电脑缺乏静音模式。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.7 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45.3 / 45.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A) |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01 | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z | LG Gram 16Z90Q Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 10% | -5% | 1% | 12% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 25.7 | 25.7 -0% | 22.8 11% | 25.2 2% | 25.2 2% | 23.9 7% | 25 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.7 | 26.1 -2% | 22.9 11% | 25.2 2% | 25.2 2% | 23.9 7% | 26 -1% |
Idle Average * | 28.4 | 26.1 8% | 22.9 19% | 25.2 11% | 25.2 11% | 23.9 16% | 27 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.4 | 27.2 4% | 26.9 5% | 25.2 11% | 29.3 -3% | 23.9 16% | 28 1% |
Load Average * | 45.3 | 44.2 2% | 41.7 8% | 55.1 -22% | 46.4 -2% | 36.6 19% | 38 16% |
Load Maximum * | 45.6 | 47.5 -4% | 43.6 4% | 61.5 -35% | 46.4 -2% | 43.2 5% | 38 17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.5 | 35.1 | 37 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
华为的冷却概念并不仅仅依靠吹出热空气。在两个散热器之间,冷空气也被吸入机箱,这应该是为了提供额外的冷却。 在我们的热图中,这种效果在负载下清晰可见。
不幸的是,这并没有降低笔记本电脑其他表面的温度。特别是在键盘的中心,我们在压力测试后测得的温度高得令人不舒服,达到43℃(109℉)。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU | LG Gram 16Z90Q Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -4% | 7% | -12% | -2% | 15% | 8% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.2 | 44.4 -3% | 37.6 13% | 44.2 -2% | 41.6 4% | 44.2 -2% | 45 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.7 | 48 -7% | 40 11% | 53 -19% | 45 -1% | 42.9 4% | 43 4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32.1 | 31.9 1% | 30.4 5% | 32.1 -0% | 31 3% | 22.4 30% | 26 19% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.1 | 31.9 -6% | 30.6 -2% | 38.4 -28% | 33.6 -12% | 22.3 26% | 26 14% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在用Prime95和FurMark进行的长达一小时的压力测试中,MateBook能够证明其冷却概念正在发挥作用。在短暂的提升阶段后,CPU和iGPU能够保持稳定的性能。在这段时间里, i9-13900H大部分时间保持在70℃(158°F)左右的舒适区。
发言人
在这里,我们终于看到了华为MateBook 16s的亮点。在其他笔记本电脑听起来平淡无奇的地方,MateBook提供了一个圆形的声音。那些正在寻找具有良好的扬声器的笔记本电脑的人将在这款华为笔记本电脑中找到它们。我们能够听到饱和的低音和清晰的高音。华为的控制台还允许你根据自己的喜好调整声音。对于那些笔记本电脑中体面的扬声器仍然不够的人,还可以使用音频端口或蓝牙连接外部设备。
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
消耗功率
在低负荷下,华为MateBook 16s的效率相对较高。然而,在中度和高度负荷下,大量的电力提供给 英特尔酷睿i9-13900H.虽然这让处理器显示了它的实力,但笔记本电脑也消耗了相应的电量,最终大大高于同类平均水平。但是,直接对比 Apple MacBook Pro 16也表明,华为的笔记本电脑仍然明显更有效率。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 1.3 Watt |
Idle | 5.8 / 7.7 / 10.6 Watt |
Load |
76.9 / 118 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 2560x1680, 16" | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" | LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 20% | 22% | -56% | 35% | -42% | 20% | 16% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.8 | 5.8 -0% | 3.3 43% | 8.7 -50% | 3.9 33% | 5.2 10% | 5 14% | 5.34 ? 8% | 6.54 ? -13% |
Idle Average * | 7.7 | 6 22% | 10.2 -32% | 13.1 -70% | 4.8 38% | 16.5 -114% | 8 -4% | 8.55 ? -11% | 11.3 ? -47% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.6 | 6.9 35% | 10.3 3% | 18.3 -73% | 10 6% | 16.8 -58% | 14 -32% | 10.8 ? -2% | 13.3 ? -25% |
Load Average * | 76.9 | 59 23% | 55.2 28% | 116 -51% | 44 43% | 113 -47% | 47 39% | 45.3 ? 41% | 70.7 ? 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 76.7 | 61.1 20% | 43.8 43% | 117.6 -53% | 42.3 45% | 92 -20% | 37.8 51% | ||
Load Maximum * | 118 | 92 22% | 65.7 44% | 162 -37% | 63 47% | 145 -23% | 56 53% | 67.5 ? 43% | 116.1 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
在我们现实的WiFi网络冲浪测试中,华为的多媒体笔记本电脑在离开插座的情况下持续了整整13小时。在全显示亮度的负载下,它仍然超过两个小时。凭借这一点,尽管MateBook在我们的比较领域拥有最强大的处理器,但它的持续时间明显比大多数竞争对手长。
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 84 Wh | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 65 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 71 Wh | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh | LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -28% | -21% | -45% | -19% | -21% | -6% | -26% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 787 | 467.7 -41% | 566 -28% | 435 -45% | 613 -22% | 887 13% | 606 -23% | 640 ? -19% |
Load | 142 | 121 -15% | 124 -13% | 119 -16% | 66 -54% | 157 11% | 97.1 ? -32% | |
Reader / Idle | 1138 | 1821 | 1085 | 1168 ? | ||||
H.264 | 861 | 1124 | 847 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决书
通过MateBook 16s,华为提供了一台坚实的笔记本电脑,只有很少的理由让人抱怨。如果我们想在高层次上提出批评,我们可以提到焊接的工作存储器,不到100%的sRGB色彩空间覆盖率,以及反射的显示表面。这款笔记本电脑的外壳质量、性能、键盘和扬声器都很好。最多,我们会希望有更多工作内存和dGPU的版本。
华为MateBook 16s是MacBook Pro的强大替代品,来自Apple 。中国笔记本电脑只在少数领域被超越。
然而,16英寸笔记本电脑之间的竞争是广泛的,有几个强大的替代品值得一看。比如说 Acer Swift Go SFG16-71和三星Galaxy Book3 Pro提供了一个明显更好的OLED显示屏,具有更高的对比度和更多的可重现的色彩。那些正在寻找一个尽可能轻的16英寸笔记本电脑的人,不会绕过 LG Gram 16.而由于其dGPU,华硕的 华硕的VivoBook Pro 16在几个方面也明显更强大。
价格和可用性
除了在德国,MateBook 16s可以从制造商那里以1800欧元的价格买到,或者从亚马逊买到,这款笔记本电脑似乎只能从国际或中国供应商的易拉宝等处买到。
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
- 06/14/2023 v7 (old)
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.