联想Yoga Pro 7 14 G8笔记本回顾： GeForce RTX 4050笔记本为3K显示屏提供120赫兹的动力
我们最近检查了新的搭配AMD处理器和iGPU的Yoga Pro 7 14和iGPU，以及AMD/GeForce RTX 3050变体，这两款产品都配备了2.5K显示屏。另一方面，联想还提供了紧凑的14英寸设备，配备英特尔猛禽湖处理器，专用GeForce RTX 4050笔记本GPU，更高分辨率的3K IPS面板，响应时间更快，120赫兹，以及更大的P3色彩空间。今天评论的主题就是这个变体，它与16GB内存和1TB PCIe 4.0固态硬盘一起，建议零售价为1699欧元（约1875美元）。
更强大的配置与之前评测的AMD机型具有相同的外壳、输入设备和扬声器，这就是为什么我们在这次评测中主要关注新的显示屏和性能值。我们以前的文章也可以获得所有进一步的信息：
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 89.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
| 88.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 |
与AMD模式的不同之处
该机箱与之前评测的AMD变体 ，没有任何区别，但由于增加了Nvidia GPU，重量略高，为1520克。铝制机箱的设计和稳定性以及做工都是相同的，因此处于非常高的水平。
端口也是相同的，但英特尔版本的两个USB-C插座支持现代雷电4标准。除此之外，两款机型之间的设备没有差异。
| Networking | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
输入设备 - 具有1.5毫米行程的舒适键盘
在输入设备方面，与之前评测的Yoga Pro 7 14的iGPU变体没有区别。由于键程为1.5毫米，打字非常舒适。总的来说，操作过程中没有任何问题。更多细节可在我们之前的评测中找到。
显示器 - 14.5英寸，3K分辨率，120赫兹
我们的测试设备中安装了可选的3K面板，分辨率为3072x1920像素，纵横比为16:10。与 基本型号这也是一块无光泽的IPS屏幕，也可以选择作为触摸屏使用。该显示器还支持120赫兹的高频率，你首先要在Windows设置中激活它。主观的图像质量是非常好的。颜色看起来很鲜艳，内容显示得很清晰。此外，我们没有观察到在明亮的表面上有任何颗粒状图像的情况。PWM闪烁在这里也没有发生，响应时间甚至比2.5K的变体还要快一点。
联想指定的亮度为400cd/m²，我们的测试设备超过了平均约450cd/m²。然而，0.34 cd/m²的黑值有点高，这就是为什么最大对比度 "只有"~1,300:1。屏幕出血现象实际上是不存在的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 443 cd/m²
Contrast: 1297:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 LEN145-3K, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Samsung SDC4192 (ATNA40YK14-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 LEN89C1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 CSOT T3 MNE507ZA1-1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 NV140DRM-N62, IPS-LED, 2240x1400, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -14% | -19% | -14% | -16% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.7 | 99.8 1% | 72.9 -26% | 66 -33% | 74.1 -25% | 70.21 -29% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 98.2 -2% | 98.5 -1% | 97.4 -3% | 99.04 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.6 | 88.7 1% | 74.6 -15% | 67.7 -23% | 75.3 -14% | 72.59 -17% |
| Response Times | 89% | -12% | -59% | 4% | -52% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.5 ? | 2.4 ? 92% | 31.8 ? -1% | 42.8 ? -36% | 31.5 ? -0% | 42 ? -33% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 15.8 ? | 2.4 ? 85% | 19.3 ? -22% | 28.7 ? -82% | 14.5 ? 8% | 27 ? -71% |
| PWM Frequency | 300 | |||||
| Screen | 26% | -150% | -90% | -158% | -122% | |
| Brightness middle | 441 | 423 -4% | 344.7 -22% | 426.5 -3% | 421 -5% | 344 -22% |
| Brightness | 453 | 427 -6% | 334 -26% | 414 -9% | 416 -8% | 330 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 98 7% | 92 0% | 88 -4% | 89 -3% | 81 -12% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.1 71% | 0.31 9% | 0.3 12% | 0.28 18% | 0.21 38% |
| Contrast | 1297 | 4230 226% | 1112 -14% | 1422 10% | 1504 16% | 1638 26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.6 | 0.55 8% | 3.01 -402% | 2.07 -245% | 3.2 -433% | 2.39 -298% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.3 | 1.15 12% | 6.3 -385% | 4.76 -266% | 5.5 -323% | 5.24 -303% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 1.15 -92% | 0.83 -38% | 0.63 -5% | 2 -233% | 0.99 -65% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 0.69 14% | 4.6 -475% | 3.2 -300% | 4.4 -450% | 4.31 -439% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.42 91% | 2.28 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 6597 99% | 6479 100% | 6420 101% | 6142 106% | 6384 102% | 6573 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 39% /
30% | -59% /
-101% | -56% /
-70% | -56% /
-104% | -63% /
-90% |
* ... smaller is better
联想宣传的3K面板具有完整的P3覆盖率，如果你想在较小的色彩空间工作，在Vantage应用中提供了P3和sRGB之间的选择。我们使用专业的CalMAN软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）对面板进行了测量，显示器在出厂状态下已经被校准得非常好。与P3参考色彩空间相比，灰度和色彩都远远低于3的重要目标值。因此，后续校准是不必要的，再加上几乎完全覆盖P3，3K面板是图像/视频编辑的理想选择。我们无法通过自己的校准来进一步改善显示效果，这就是为什么这里没有提供色彩配置文件供下载。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
3K面板的户外适用性很好，因为体面的亮度和哑光表面的结合使得内容的可视性很好。视角的稳定性也没有留下批评的余地。
性能 - 猛禽湖和Ada Lovelace
对于英特尔型号，联想安装了目前H系列的猛禽湖处理器，即我们测试配置中的酷睿i5-13500H或酷睿i7-13700H。这些都可以与iGPU一起使用，或者与专用的GeForce RTX 3050或GeForce RTX 4050。内存大小（LPDDR5-5200）是16或32GB，但用户在这里没有扩展内存的选择。
测试条件
像往常一样，联想提供了三种性能模式（电池保护器、智能冷却和高性能）。虽然在高性能模式下，对于带有iGPU的AMD机型来说，并没有真正的好处。带iGPU的AMD型号但这里的情况不同，因为只有在高性能 模式下，用户才能从RTX 4050中获得最大的性能。 RTX 4050而且在综合负载下的性能也更好。我们在下面的表格中列出了不同的TDP/TGP值：
| 性能模式 | CPU负载 | GPU负载 | 压力测试 | 最大风扇音量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Saver | 50 -> 20瓦 | 12瓦 | CPU：15瓦 GPU：12 瓦 |
30 dB(A) |
| 智能冷却 | 64 -> 42 瓦 | 35 瓦 | CPU: 25 瓦 GPU: 25 瓦 |
37,7 dB(A) |
| 高性能 | 80 -> 53 瓦 | 55 瓦 | CPU：30-64瓦 GPU：40瓦 |
46,2 dB(A) |
在下面的基准测试和测量中，默认使用了高性能模式。如果你在日常生活中不需要完全的性能，你可以使用Fn+Q组合键在各种模式之间轻松切换，而电池保护模式 则会大大降低性能。
处理器 - 酷睿i7-13700H
芯片 英特尔酷睿i7-13700H目前的 "猛禽湖 "一代基本上是一个旧的 酷睿i7-12700H具有稍高的涡轮增压时钟。它仍然是一个非常快的移动处理器，有6个性能核心（包括超线程）和8个效率核心，这就是为什么CPU可以同时处理最多20个线程。原则上，它是一个45瓦的处理器，但这与它的实际能力关系不大，因为该处理器能够消耗120瓦以上的功率。在Yoga Pro 7 14的情况下，处理器被允许消耗高达80瓦，几分钟后就平息在55瓦。这意味着，英特尔处理器也可以比其AMD对应产品（最大60瓦）消耗更多，这就是为什么比起 Ryzen 7 7735HS在我们的Cinebench R15多循环的开始阶段和基准测试中。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
总的来说，无论是多核还是单核测试，CPU的性能都非常好，但这也是以高耗电为代价的。另一方面，你也可以在日常使用中毫无问题地使用智能冷却 模式。
在电池保护模式 下，酷睿i7-13700H的最大功率被限制在70瓦，这导致在多核情况下仅有5%的小的性能亏损。更多的CPU基准测试可在 这里.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=28) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=28) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=28) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=28) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=28) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 278, n=28) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=28) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=28) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=28) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=28) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=28) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=28) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=28) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=28) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=28) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=28) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=28) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=28) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12872 - 52727, n=28) | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
系统性能
Yoga Pro 7 14的一般系统性能非常高，所有的输入都能毫无延迟地实现。这种积极的印象在合成基准测试中得到进一步加强，我们的测试设备能够超过大多数对手的表现。测试期间没有出现任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (6822 - 7556, n=7) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10283 - 11549, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8368 - 9836, n=7) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9527 - 10643, n=7) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1205 - 1937, n=9) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1158 - 1877, n=9) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1293 - 2044, n=9) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1097 - 1929, n=9) | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7292 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (24334 - 78081, n=28) | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (23681 - 79656, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (22986 - 99898, n=28) | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=28) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
我们的Yoga Pro 7 14测试变体在目前BIOS版本的标准化延迟测试（网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载）中显示出轻微的限制，因此只适合在有限范围内使用实时音频应用程序。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想为Yoga Pro 7配备了快速的PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD，在我们的测试设备中，它来自三星。PM9A1（980 Pro的OEM版本）提供1TB的存储容量，其中890GB在首次启动时可用。传输速率非常好，但由于温度问题，性能无法在持续负荷下保持，几分钟后下降了约50%。然而，速率仍然在3GB/s左右，所以在日常使用中没有真正的劣势。更多的SSD基准测试被列在这里.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
除了集成的Iris Xe Graphics G7GPU，在要求不高的任务中负责图形输出，Yoga Pro 7 14还配备了专用的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 Laptop图形卡。它的最大功耗为55瓦，这绝不是最快的GPU变体，它在游戏时的功耗约为90-95瓦（更高的TGP规格与RTX 4050笔记本电脑在游戏时无关，正如我们看到的那样 在我们对新GPU的审查中另一方面，对于一个紧凑的14英寸设备来说，这个额定功率仍然是完美的。
我们已经审查了Yoga Pro 7 14与Ryzen 7 7735HS和 GeForce RTX 3050(最大58瓦），这使我们能够方便地在性能上进行直接比较。在合成测试中，新的RTX 4050的速度在30-40%之间，对于相当的功耗来说，这是一个非常好的结果。然而，该GPU也比我们在15英寸的RTX 4050中测试的最快变体慢了25%左右。 MSI Katana 15，比如说。
图形性能在持续负载下并不完全稳定，因为Time Spy 压力测试在95%时就会失败。在电池保护程序中，允许显卡最大消耗45瓦，这就是为什么图形性能只下降了约8%。更多的GPU基准测试可在我们的技术部分.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 23042 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15284 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6954 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=37) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=37) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=37) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Yoga Pro 7 14的游戏性能与它的 GeForce RTX 4050总体来说非常好，即使该多媒体设备没有G-Sync或Advanced Optimus等特殊游戏功能。在我们的标准测试游戏中，与配备RTX 3050的姐妹机型相比，其优势在于 配备RTX 3050的姐妹机型的平均优势为36%，而 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti(45W)的 申科视界14则超过了28%。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
即使是目前的游戏，如《赛博朋克2077》、《F1 2022》或《霍格沃茨遗产》，在Yoga上玩也没有问题，但你应该把自己限制在1080p，在那里可以实现最大的细节。在QHD分辨率下，在要求较高的游戏中，FPS数字下降到30FPS范围。在较长的时间里，游戏性能几乎完全保持稳定。
| F1 22 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Engineering Sample | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10.9 - 56.4, n=23) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.23 - 72.6, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Engineering Sample | |
| MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (50 - 127, n=23) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17 - 145, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Engineering Sample | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (44.4 - 79.4, n=14) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9.2 - 103, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (39 - 77.3, n=8) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12.1 - 53, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 179.1 | 161.5 | 78.7 | 57.7 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 230 | 157 | 96 | 66 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 178.8 | 165.6 | 156.3 | 148 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 82.7 | 59.9 | 41.6 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 148.5 | 124 | 100.9 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 151 | 89 | 81 | 76 | 53 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 309 | 191.5 | 157.7 | 87.2 | 62.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 72 | 60 | 53 | 49 | 31 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 169.5 | 159.2 | 116.8 | 42.6 | 27.1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 84 | 74 | 59 | 53 |
排放--联想控制住了温度
噪声
在日常使用中，Yoga Pro 7 14是一个非常安静的伴侣，没有任何恼人的电子噪音。然而，如果你一直使用高性能模式，风扇就会迅速启动，甚至在短时间的负载高峰期（这是故意的），这在简单的任务中会有些烦人。在负载情况下，智能冷却和高性能模式之间有明显的听觉差异，这也可以从下表中看出：
| 应用 | 电池保护器 | 智能冷却 | 高性能 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 06 | 30 dB(A) | 37,7 dB(A) | 43,7 dB(A) |
| Witcher 3 | 30 dB(A) | 37,7 dB(A) | 46,2 dB(A) |
| 压力测试 | 30 dB(A) | 37,7 dB(A) | 46,2 dB(A) |
关于游戏，如果游戏运行正常，值得测试智能冷却模式。这可以带来很大的不同，特别是在没有耳机的情况下。然而，即使在高性能 模式下，Yoga也是我们对比组中最安静的设备（尽管差异不大）。在电池保护模式 下，该设备要安静得多，但性能太低，游戏无法正常运行。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 22.9 / 22.9 / 36.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43.7 / 46.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.9 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 6% | 8% | -1% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 22.9 | 24 -5% | 22.7 1% | 23.2 -1% | 24.4 -7% | 25 -9% |
| Idle Minimum * | 22.9 | 24 -5% | 22.8 -0% | 23.3 -2% | 24.4 -7% | 26.6 -16% |
| Idle Average * | 22.9 | 24 -5% | 22.8 -0% | 23.3 -2% | 24.4 -7% | 26.6 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 36.8 | 35.71 3% | 22.8 38% | 23.3 37% | 27.8 24% | 27.5 25% |
| Load Average * | 43.7 | 43.8 -0% | 37.4 14% | 43.3 1% | 49.7 -14% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.2 | 40.22 13% | 43.8 5% | 41.7 10% | 48.2 -4% | |
| Load Maximum * | 46.2 | 51.93 -12% | 47.1 -2% | 47.7 -3% | 48.8 -6% | 49.7 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
鉴于强大的组件和紧凑的机箱，表面温度总是一个有趣的话题，但联想在这里总体上做得不错。在要求不高的任务中，笔记本一点也不热，底部只有两个热点，分别在底座的中上部区域。在压力测试中，键盘的温度最高为41°C，在游戏过程中约为39°C，从未出现不舒服的情况。然而，底部的热点温度要高得多，压力测试中最高为56℃，游戏中为49℃，因此在这种情况下应避免皮肤直接接触。
在压力测试中，CPU的功率略低于35瓦，GPU的功率为40瓦，在整个测试中保持不变。在压力测试后没有观察到功率直接下降。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.7 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.1 °C / 80.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.7 °C / 3 F).
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 3% | 7% | -4% | -8% | -21% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.6 | 42 -1% | 42.2 -1% | 41.6 -0% | 48.4 -16% | 49.8 -20% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 55.7 | 52 7% | 49 12% | 49.2 12% | 57.1 -3% | 51 8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.9 | 26 -0% | 24.4 6% | 29.8 -15% | 28.1 -8% | 39.6 -53% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28 | 27 4% | 25.2 10% | 31.2 -11% | 29 -4% | 32.7 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--3K面板的能源需求增加
消耗功率
相较于 iGPU版本的Yoga Pro 7 14采用哑光2.5K面板，我们的测试设备，具有更高分辨率的3K显示屏和更高的120赫兹频率，在空闲时消耗更多的电力，我们在全亮度下测量了超过13瓦的能量。在负载情况下，英特尔处理器和GeForce GPU的功耗增加当然很明显，这就是为什么联想还为该配置配备了一个更强大的140瓦电源适配器。
在压力测试中，我们短暂地看到最大消耗量略高于140瓦，然后迅速稳定在100瓦左右。在游戏过程中，这种动态也应在意料之中，因此140瓦的电源总体上完全足够。低待机消耗率也是一个积极的观点。
| Off / Standby | 0.22 / 0.27 Watt |
| Idle | 7.6 / 13.3 / 13.7 Watt |
| Load |
88.2 / 143 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS-LED, 2240x1400, 14" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 39% | 21% | 6% | 8% | 12% | 21% | -21% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.6 | 4.1 46% | 7.4 3% | 7.6 -0% | 7.4 3% | 7.5 1% | 7.3 4% | 9.84 ? -29% | 6.63 ? 13% |
| Idle Average * | 13.3 | 7.7 42% | 8.3 38% | 12.2 8% | 11 17% | 10.4 22% | 8.3 38% | 14.8 ? -11% | 11.2 ? 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13.7 | 7.9 42% | 8.7 36% | 12.8 7% | 15 -9% | 11.4 17% | 13.1 4% | 19.1 ? -39% | 13.3 ? 3% |
| Load Average * | 88.2 | 66.2 25% | 76 14% | 76.5 13% | 81.6 7% | 83.3 6% | 70 21% | 87.9 ? -0% | 70.7 ? 20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 94.2 | 61.5 35% | 70 26% | 89.5 5% | 90 4% | 92.7 2% | 70.2 25% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 143 | 84.3 41% | 132 8% | 135.7 5% | 105.6 26% | 110.3 23% | 95 34% | 179.6 ? -26% | 116.6 ? 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
电池运行时间也比iGPU版本略差。 iGPU变种的电池运行时间也略差，即在WLAN测试和视频测试中都少了三个小时（每个测试都在150cd/m²--测试设备最大亮度的76%下运行）。即在WLAN测试和视频测试中都少了三个小时（每次都在150cd/m²的条件下运行--测试设备最大亮度的76%）。另一方面，在Wi-Fi测试中不到10小时和视频测试中约12.5小时的结果本身和在比较组中仍然具有竞争力。在全显示亮度的WLAN测试中，运行时间下降到刚刚超过7小时。当120赫兹模式被激活时（默认情况下，在电池保护程序中频率被设置为60赫兹），在150cd/m²的情况下，WLAN测试中的运行时间约为2小时，在全亮度下约为1小时。
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, 73 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 58.7 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 43% | 33% | 6% | -41% | 48% | 28% | 40% | |
| H.264 | 742 | 903 22% | 666 -10% | 739 0% | 847 ? 14% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 595 | 783 32% | 457 -23% | 628 6% | 351 -41% | 607 2% | 643 8% | 640 ? 8% |
| Load | 49 | 86 76% | 92 88% | 124 153% | 86 76% | 97.1 ? 98% | ||
| Reader / Idle | 678 | 1168 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论--Yoga Pro 7 14在RTX 4050的帮助下也取得了非常好的成绩。
新的iGPU模型的 联想Yoga Pro 7 14在我们几周前的评测中给人留下了非常好的印象--高效的CPU/iGPU组合，良好的机箱，非常好的键盘，长的电池寿命和良好的IPS哑光表面显示屏。在该系列机型的另一端是我们目前的审查单位，它采用了英特尔/英伟达的组合以及可选的3K显示屏。当然，机箱和输入设备的基本良好特性也适用于英特尔型号，而且这里还支持雷电4。
当然，在性能上也有明显的差异。得益于新的 GeForce RTX 4050笔记本GPU、瑜伽现在更像是一台多媒体笔记本电脑，也能够在1080p下处理当前的标题而没有问题。当然，这不是最快的RTX 4050版本，其最大TGP为55瓦，但鉴于14英寸的紧凑外壳，性能值绝对没问题。与旧的 GeForce RTX 3050笔记本GPU、你可以期待超过30%的领先优势。英特尔的 英特尔处理器也提供了良好的性能，但它也不像AMD模型那样高效。
可选的哑光3K面板提供了非常好的图像质量，没有PWM闪烁，尽管与标准2.5K型号的主观差异并不大。除了更高的分辨率，它还提供稍快的频率，更快的响应时间，更大的色彩空间覆盖率，以及与P3参考相比出色的色彩准确性ex作品，这就是为什么你可以立即开始编辑图像。3K面板也更亮一些，但也需要更多的电力，这在电池运行时间上也很明显。原则上，这两种显示屏的变体都不会出错，但那些不喜欢图像编辑或最快的第一人称射击游戏的人也可以毫不犹豫地抓住普通2.5K IPS显示屏。
配备了GeForce RTX 4050笔记本GPU和P3全覆盖的3K显示屏，联想Yoga Pro 7 14成为一台神奇的多媒体笔记本电脑。正如预期的那样，电池运行时间和排放比iGPU变体更差，但目前的标题可以在1080p和最大细节下顺利播放。
考虑到更高的性能，较响的风扇是可以接受的，性能模式可以通过按下一个按钮来切换。这样的性能对于大多数游戏来说仍然是足够的，但同时你也会受益于明显更安静的风扇（~38对46dB(A)）。英特尔版本的内存也不能扩展，但用户在购买时至少可以选择32GB。另一个缺点是电池寿命较短，因为3K面板尤其需要更多电量。然而，在同类产品的比较中，Yoga Pro 7 14仍有竞争力。
技嘉创造了一个直接的竞争者，即新的 Aero 14 OLED、它也采用了 酷睿i7-13700H以及 GeForce RTX 4050 LaptopGPU。然而，性能比联想的要低一点，而且不是每个用户都想要OLED屏幕，Aero 14 OLED也要贵300欧元（约330美元）。我们还将对目前的 MSI Stealth 14 Studio很快，它不仅配备了13700H/RTX 4050组合，而且还配备了240赫兹的QHD面板。然而，这里的价格也刚刚低于2000美元。这款 申克尔Vision 14仍然是一个有趣的选择，它具有更低的重量和更好的可维护性，但组件尚未更新到当前的标准，而且旧的 RTX 3050 Ti在游戏时大约慢了20-25%。
价格和可用性
根据对联想在美国、加拿大、英国、法国、印度、新加坡和澳大利亚网站的搜索（08.05.2023），Yoga Pro 7 14（配备英特尔处理器、GeForce RTX 4050和3K显示屏）目前似乎还没有上市。建议有兴趣的买家定期直接通过联想（如适用）或通过授权经销商查询供应情况。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8
- 05/07/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
