Notebookcheck Logo

华为MatePad SE平板电脑评测--价格小，电池小

起居室短跑运动员。

华为MatePad SE是一款适合家庭使用的廉价平板电脑。低重量和金属底盘不能掩盖这样一个事实，即买家必须接受目前所有华为设备的限制。我们的详细评论揭示了我们是否还能推荐这款平板电脑。
ARM Tablet Touchscreen
华为MatePad SE

华为在欧洲的日子仍然不好过，因为缺乏谷歌服务意味着，如果你真的想让所有重要的应用程序工作，你必须要有创造力，有时根本无法工作。尽管如此，这些设备仍然很受欢迎，因为它们往往能提供很多价格。

MatePad SE是一款10.4英寸的平板电脑，售价略低于200欧元。这款平板电脑类似于 MatePad T10S但配备了高通处理器。让我们看看MatePad SE在我们的测试中表现如何。

Huawei MatePad SE (MatePad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Memory
4 GB 
Display
10.40 inch 15:9, 2000 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gravity
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 247 x 156.7
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10 Watt charging
Operating System
Huawei HarmonyOS
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, AF, video@1080p
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
440 g
Price
229 Euro
Links
Huawei homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
81.2 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Huawei MatePad SE
SD 680, Adreno 610		440 g7.9 mm10.40"2000x1200
82.5 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2		465 g7.45 mm10.61"2000x1200
80.9 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Huawei MatePad T10S
Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4		450 g7.85 mm10.10"1920x1200
82.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2021
Realme Pad
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2		440 g6.9 mm10.40"2000x1200
81 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2		508 g6.9 mm10.50"1920x1200

外壳 - MatePad上的轻质金属底盘

就其尺寸而言，MatePad SE是一款相对较轻的平板电脑，重440克。其设计类似于 MatePad T10S但端口的分布不同，颜色也只是深灰色。此外，这款平板电脑稍短一些，但更宽。屏幕周围的边缘尺寸很好，因此你可以用手握住平板电脑，而不会无意中触发触摸屏指令，同时外观看起来很现代。

在稳定性方面，MatePad SE处于中等水平：背面和屏幕可以相对容易地被压住，这在屏幕的液晶中也有部分体现。不过基本上，这款平板电脑显得很坚固。背面和边缘是由一块金属制成的，为了更好地处理，在上边缘插入了一个塑料条。

华为MatePad SE
华为MatePad SE
华为MatePad SE
华为MatePad SE
华为MatePad SE
华为MatePad SE
华为MatePad SE

尺寸比较

❌
251.2 mm 158.8 mm 7.45 mm 465 g247 mm 156.7 mm 7.9 mm 440 g246.8 mm 161.9 mm 6.9 mm 508 g246.1 mm 155.9 mm 6.9 mm 440 g240.2 mm 159 mm 7.85 mm 450 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

特点 - 不是存储巨头，但有microSD

凭借其64GB的大容量存储和4GB的内存，这款华为平板电脑的配置在这个价格范围内是正常的。目前在欧洲没有提供更大的存储空间的变体。

与大型平板电脑通常的情况一样，NFC不可用，USB端口只根据USB 2.0标准进行内部连接，因此数据传输需要较长时间。

左边：3.5毫米接口，扬声器
左边：3.5毫米接口，扬声器
右边。扬声器、USB-C端口、microSD插槽
右边。扬声器、USB-C端口、microSD插槽
顶部：麦克风、待机按钮、音量摇杆
顶部：麦克风、待机按钮、音量摇杆
底部：没有连接
底部：没有连接

微型SD卡读卡器

这款microSD读卡器在我们的参考卡Angelbird V60上运行良好，并在CPDT基准测试中提供了坚实的写入率。然而，读取率的特点是部分大幅下降。该设备在复制测试中处于一个等级水平。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
49.18 MB/s +150%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
19.7 MB/s
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.9 MB/s -9%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.2 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
16.11 MB/s -18%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø36.1 (13.9-54.3)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø42 (31.2-52.8)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.5 (23.8-57.4)
Realme Pad Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø23.3 (10.1-36.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø52.3 (17.2-85.2)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70.5 (13.8-78.6)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (44.6-84.2)
Realme Pad Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø48.5 (19.1-79.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

软件--显著的限制

华为平板电脑配备了内部操作系统HarmonyOS 3，该系统基于Android 的开源部分，因此也支持大多数Android ，但由于贸易限制，它不得不没有谷歌服务。因此，由于第三方软件的存在，要想让谷歌软件发挥作用，有些麻烦，也不完全安全。

尽管如此，制造商还是设法通过应用库和综合搜索在平板电脑上使用大多数应用程序。种类很好，但并不完美。例如，很难找到一个追踪路线并将其导出为.gpx文件的应用程序。此外，你必须使用第三方供应商，如Apkpure的许多应用程序，一方面，它并不总是包含一个应用程序的最新版本，另一方面，还 已经被发现含有恶意代码.

有DRM认证，所以你可以用高清观看主要流媒体平台的视频。

华为通过儿童空间为儿童提供了一个专门的环境，父母可以对其进行广泛的配置，以保护后代免受有害内容的影响。

该操作系统的安全补丁是从2022年12月开始的，因此在测试时是相当最新的。

软件 华为MatePad SE
软件 华为MatePad SE
软件 华为MatePad SE

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 带有定位错误

在国际上，也有一个带有蜂窝模块的型号。在欧洲，目前只有AGS5-W09变体可用，它只通过Wi-Fi进行通信。WiFi 5是最快的标准。在我们与参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000的测试中，这款平板电脑显示了该价格范围内的典型速度和非常稳定的数据速率。

在靠近路由器的地方，以及在10米的距离和穿过3堵墙的地方，接收效果都很好。WLAN型号没有定位模块，所以它不能用于导航。定位服务至少可以通过Wi-Fi网络获得大致的位置，但由于一个奇怪的错误，我们的设备无法启动。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (318min - 354max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
350 (270min - 358max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (335min - 351max) MBit/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
325 (163min - 328max) MBit/s +5%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 (284min - 330max) MBit/s
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
203 (158min - 227max) MBit/s -35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (352min - 379max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
349 (178min - 357max) MBit/s -4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 (167min - 354max) MBit/s -5%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
239 (202min - 259max) MBit/s -35%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø310 (284-330)
Huawei MatePad SE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø365 (352-379)

照相机 - 非常简单的传感器

来自前置摄像头的照片
来自前置摄像头的照片

正如已经与 MatePad T10SMatePad SE只有非常基本的相机设备：背面有一个500万像素的镜头，正面有一个200万像素的自拍相机。

主摄像头的照片即使不放大也显得相当模糊，没有显示很多细节。它们也可以被更好地提亮。周围的图像也缺乏动感，看起来被冲淡了。这款小相机在低光和高对比度下也很吃力：光源被遮住，图片看起来有颗粒感。

录制的视频最高可以达到1080p。缓慢的自动对焦在这里被注意到了，是负面的。

用前置摄像头拍摄的自拍也显得有些缺乏细节，但可以在光线良好且放大倍数不高的情况下使用。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
orginal image
click to load images

主摄像头也必须在实验室中证明自己。然而，即使在非常好的工作室光线下，锐度问题和太少的对比度也是显而易见的。在照度为1lux的情况下，几乎没有任何东西可以被识别。

MatePad SE显然不是用来拍照的。相机是可用的，但总的来说更像是一种权宜之计。

ColorChecker
26.5 ∆E
21 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
18 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad SE: 18.41 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 27.28 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
53.9 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
44 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
53.9 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
66.8 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
77.2 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
88.7 ∆E
70.1 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad SE: 46.7 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 88.66 ∆E

附件和保修 - MatePad SE附带的充电器

华为为平板电脑配备了一个10瓦的充电器，一条USB线，以及一个SIM卡工具。

制造商在其网站上提供一个配套的对开盖，价格为20欧元。除此之外，配件的范围看起来相当小。

制造商提供了一个24个月的 保修为其平板电脑。

输入设备和操作 - 没有指纹传感器

像这个价格范围内的通常情况一样，这款平板电脑只有60赫兹的屏幕，所以输入的速度感觉有点慢。然而，事实证明，触摸屏是精确的，易于使用。

没有指纹传感器，MatePad SE只能通过面部识别进行生物识别。学习过程很快，在良好的照明条件下，识别速度快且可靠。

然而，这种方法没有额外的硬件支持，因此不太安全，因为它可能被图片、面具或长相相似的人骗过。

键盘横向模式
键盘横向模式
键盘纵向模式
键盘纵向模式

显示屏 - 色彩真实，但也有低对比度

子像素结构
子像素结构

IPS屏幕的分辨率为2000 x 1200像素，尺寸为10.4英寸，提供了足够的空间来并排运行两个应用程序，而且分辨率也足够高，肉眼几乎看不到单个像素。

屏幕亮度足够，平均为368cd/m²，但 联想Tab M10 Plus例如，在这里提供了更多。黑值处于中等水平，加上同样只有平均亮度，这导致了适度的对比度，所以颜色在IPS显示屏上看起来有点苍白。

364
cd/m²		377
cd/m²		356
cd/m²
370
cd/m²		398
cd/m²		361
cd/m²
348
cd/m²		375
cd/m²		360
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 398 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 367.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 398 cd/m²
Contrast: 865:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.214
Huawei MatePad SE
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"		Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 10.6"		Huawei MatePad T10S
LCD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"		Realme Pad
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"		Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5"
Screen
16%
-25%
-60%
-75%
Brightness middle
398
510
28%
285
-28%
426
7%
368
-8%
Brightness
368
480
30%
282
-23%
429
17%
346
-6%
Brightness Distribution
87
85
-2%
91
5%
93
7%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.46
0.49
-7%
0.3
35%
0.47
-2%
0.61
-33%
Contrast
865
1041
20%
950
10%
906
5%
603
-30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.17
1.8
17%
3.53
-63%
6.29
-190%
6.9
-218%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.32
3.7
14%
5.84
-35%
10.97
-154%
11.4
-164%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
2.2
29%
6.2
-100%
8.3
-168%
7.7
-148%
Gamma
2.214 99%
2.17 101%
2.044 108%
2.03 108%
2.16 102%
CCT
7245 90%
6907 94%
8130 80%
9057 72%
8547 76%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们用分光光度计和CalMAN软件详细测量了图像的表现。事实上，它被证明是相对真实的；肉眼几乎看不出偏色。sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率也几乎是完整的，所以平板电脑可以忠实地显示这个色彩空间的几乎所有色调。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间DCI P3
卡尔曼色彩空间DCI P3
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
28.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 14.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.4 ms rise
↘ 21.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外，即使在冬日，这款平板电脑也会出现强烈的反光，所以最好退到阴凉处。

视角很好。侧面有轻微的亮度下降，但主体始终保持可识别性。

户外使用
户外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 记忆缓慢

随着 高通骁龙680中国制造商已经为这个价格范围选择了一个合适的SoC。这款处理器只有不到两年的历史，采用6纳米工艺制造。

有了它，MatePad SE可以很好地跟上其他设备。纯粹的处理器性能甚至超过了该价格范围内的其他平板电脑。然而，当你看到整个系统时，缓慢的内存使MatePad变慢。

在日常使用中，你不得不时常忍受卡顿，而且导航系统也不总是完全流畅。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points +88%
Huawei MatePad SE
377 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (323 - 386, n=15)
374 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
365 Points -3%
Realme Pad
345 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
343 Points -9%
Huawei MatePad T10S
296 Points -21%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points +53%
Huawei MatePad SE
1630 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1287 - 1738, n=15)
1585 Points -3%
Realme Pad
1297 Points -20%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1256 Points -23%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1247 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1229 Points -25%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)
469872 Points +133%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (201810 - 274001, n=6)
229317 Points +14%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
211417 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad SE
201897 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
201310 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
182567 Points -10%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9847 Points +81%
Realme Pad
8120 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7447 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4535 - 8730, n=15)
6633 Points +22%
Huawei MatePad T10S
6622 Points +22%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
6583 Points +21%
Huawei MatePad SE
5432 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
773 Points +131%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (325 - 413, n=8)
374 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
361 Points +8%
Huawei MatePad SE
335 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4205 Points +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2444 - 2738, n=8)
2581 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad SE
2580 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
2134 Points -17%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2013 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1839 Points -29%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7265 Points +26%
Huawei MatePad SE
5760 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5521 - 5852, n=8)
5716 Points -1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4845 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4729 Points -18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
4133 Points -28%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4862 Points +44%
Huawei MatePad SE
3381 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2742 - 3824, n=8)
3376 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2896 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
2436 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
970 Points -71%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9168 Points +360%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1994 - 2183, n=8)
2134 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2001 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad SE
1994 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1786 Points -10%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1452 Points -27%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1246 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1186 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad SE
1141 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (917 - 1199, n=8)
1077 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad T10S
956 Points -16%
AImark - Score v2.x
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
6865 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4320 - 4995, n=5)
4747 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4659 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
4455 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11323 Points +168%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4150 - 4853, n=6)
4405 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad SE
4228 Points

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Realme Pad Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
 
Average of class Tablet

还有 Adreno 610也为这个价格范围提供了合适的图形能力。然而，它不能完全跟上对比设备的步伐，尤其是较早的基准测试造成的问题。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
186 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points +49%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
171 Points +43%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
152 Points +27%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
120 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
184 Points +52%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
176 Points +45%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
176 Points +45%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 Points +26%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
121 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
708 Points +61%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
691 Points +57%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
686 Points +56%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
564 Points +28%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
440 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
712 Points +61%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
691 Points +57%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
687 Points +56%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
557 Points +26%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
441 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2105 Points
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2054 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1787 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1501 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1957 Points
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1903 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1675 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1356 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2862 Points
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2846 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2787 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2441 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1463 Points +10%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1387 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1355 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1330 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1124 Points -15%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1875 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1284 Points +11%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1211 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1156 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
981 Points -15%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2865 Points +2%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2830 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2809 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2564 Points -9%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2365 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1488 Points +19%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1398 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1364 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1255 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1059 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1340 Points +22%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1242 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1197 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1101 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
954 Points -13%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2698 Points +10%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2490 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2458 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2422 Points -1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
230 Points -91%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1425 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1384 Points +5%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1352 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1312 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1085 Points -17%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1252 Points +10%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1187 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1182 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1141 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
955 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2768 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2754 Points
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2631 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2587 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2236 Points -19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps +8%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps +6%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
36 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps +10%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +3%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps +25%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps +5%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps +24%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps +14%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +15%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -7%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps +26%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps +16%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps +14%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.3 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps +23%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps +16%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.1 fps +15%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.9 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps +15%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.4 fps +4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps -8%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps +13%
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.9 fps -9%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps +15%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8 fps -7%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps -12%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps +8%
Huawei MatePad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.3 fps
Realme Pad
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps -6%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.3 fps -54%

在浏览网页时，你必须一次又一次地等待图片，而且大型网站加载你刚刚滚动到的部分也需要时间。你可以毫无问题地使用MatePad SE进行冲浪，但不应该期待最高速度。

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)
111.2 Points +211%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (35.7 - 63.1, n=8)
45.8 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
43.98 Points +23%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)
35.746 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
32.868 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
30.25 Points -15%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)
106.9 Points +161%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (41 - 66, n=5)
51 Points +24%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)
41 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
155.2 Points +168%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
75 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (58 - 94, n=7)
71.6 Points +23%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)
58 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
55 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
46 Points -21%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
121.9 runs/min +273%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (32.7 - 65.3, n=8)
43.4 runs/min +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
33.35 runs/min +2%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)
32.7 runs/min
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
25.64 runs/min -22%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
21.8 runs/min -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points +183%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
12744 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6358 - 15553, n=12)
11775 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10787 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)
10370 Points
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
9996 Points -4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
4122 ms * -19%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3734 ms * -8%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)
3460.5 ms *
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
3227.4 ms * +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3060 ms * +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2461 - 3461, n=7)
3029 ms * +12%

* ... smaller is better

不幸的是，华为只使用非常慢的eMMC闪存作为大容量存储。这在这个价格范围内很常见，但这本来是一个很好的选择，可以使平板电脑在加载和数据传输过程中以相对较少的努力变得更快，从而也提高了感知的系统速度。不幸的是，你经常需要等待相当长的时间，而且MatePad SE经常感觉有点迟钝。

Huawei MatePad SELenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3Huawei MatePad T10SRealme PadSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
34%
-2%
94%
2%
7%
326%
Sequential Read 256KB
293.6
393.23
34%
302.9
3%
309
5%
255.1
-13%
274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=204)
-7%
1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years)
256%
Sequential Write 256KB
99.5
234.88
136%
99
-1%
211.4
112%
101.1
2%
176.6 ?(40 - 274, n=204)
77%
686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years)
589%
Random Read 4KB
61.8
75.12
22%
51.1
-17%
111.6
81%
68.3
11%
59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=204)
-4%
189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years)
206%
Random Write 4KB
54
23.97
-56%
57.8
7%
150.2
178%
57.5
6%
32.2 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=204)
-40%
189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years)
252%

游戏--不是主要的学科

MatePad SE当然不是一个经典的游戏机设备，60赫兹的屏幕已经说明了这一点。它至少可以用于较简单的动作游戏，如Armajet，平均帧数为58.3帧。

在现代游戏中，如《暗黑破坏神：不朽》，限制在30帧，以及明显的、反复出现的帧率下降更多是一种阻碍，至少在非常高的设置下是如此。我们用来自GameBench的软件测量帧率.

控制基本上工作良好，触摸屏和位置传感器的反应足够快。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
暗黑破坏神：不朽
暗黑破坏神：不朽
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø58.3 (50-60)
Huawei MatePad SE; Diablo Immortal; 1.7.0: Ø26.5 (20-30)

排放 - 几乎没有加热，没有节流

温度

即使在SoC长时间高负荷运行后，外壳上的最大升温也很难察觉：我们测得最大温度为30.2℃。同时，在3DMark压力测试中，这款平板电脑在长时间负载后没有显示任何性能下降的迹象。

因此，那些寻找性能稳定、温度较低的平板电脑的人将会得到MatePad SE的良好建议。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

00.20.40.60.91.11.31.51.71.92.12.32.62.833.23.43.63.84.1Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.64 (2.64-2.64)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.1 (4.03-4.12)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.34 (3.33-3.35)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.725 (0.703-0.747)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø1.038 (1.025-1.051)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø0.92 (0.907-0.927)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)
Max. Load
 28.3 °C29.5 °C24.2 °C 
 26.4 °C25.2 °C23.9 °C 
 25 °C24 °C23.4 °C 
Maximum: 29.5 °C
Average: 25.5 °C
25.7 °C30.2 °C29.6 °C
25.1 °C27.1 °C27.4 °C
24.3 °C25.7 °C26.2 °C
Maximum: 30.2 °C
Average: 26.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.5 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面

演讲者

虽然MatePad SE的侧面有四个扬声器格栅，但其中只有两个下面真正有扬声器。

即使在最大音量下，立体声也不会过度膨胀，但也不是特别饱满。对于偶尔的流行歌曲来说，这已经足够了，但那些想要更高的音质的人将不得不去寻找其他地方或连接外部音频设备。

这可以通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙进行。两者的工作都没有问题，但你不应该希望有太多的蓝牙编解码器：没有aptX，选择也相当有限。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.135.12532.640.63127.434.34030.536.45034.140.46329.432.78019.921.21002221.812522.925.116014.235.62001138.525011.742.43158.5474008.953.25009.458.663010.162.980016.561.910001468.6125015.467.3160010.563.2200010.765.9250011.365315011.964.5400012.961500013.564.7630014.260.8800015501000015.745.91250016.450.21600017.351.5SPL25.576N0.734.9median 13.5median 58.6Delta2.710.635.228.921.72018.622.421.720.43233.625.724.527.419.624.318.316.326.518.944.817.547.812.352.715.758.911.660.311.869.712.472.111.671.412.577.213.176.712.576.213.172.212.870.312.868.512.976.313.379.413.480.313.774.613.768.814.463.613.751.725.287.40.771.6median 13.1median 70.31.511.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad SESamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 充电速度慢

消耗功率

与这个价格区间的其他平板电脑相比，华为的MatePad SE在能源消耗方面相当节俭。

这款平板电脑的最大充电功率为10瓦，这意味着直到电池再次完全充满可能需要3个小时。当设备同时使用时，充电的时间可能更长。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.3 / 2.8 Watt
Load midlight 6.5 / 10.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MatePad SE
5100 mAh		Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
7500 mAh		Huawei MatePad T10S
5100 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Power Consumption
-16%
-17%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
0.94
37%
1.6
-7%
1.19
21%
Idle Average *
2.3
4.22
-83%
2.8
-22%
4.63
-101%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
4.37
-56%
3.5
-25%
4.68
-67%
Load Average *
6.5
6.12
6%
7.9
-22%
7.27
-12%
Load Maximum *
10.7
9.14
15%
11.5
-7%
9.17
14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE: Ø7.56 (5.51-10.7)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Huawei MatePad SE; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.42 (6.3-6.53)
Huawei MatePad SE; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.56 (1.501-1.772)

电池寿命

在电池寿命方面，5100毫安时的电池，正如已经在 MatePad T10S，太小了。现在大多数智能手机都提供类似的高容量电池，所以其他平板电脑有时会管理更长的运行时间。

在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，这款平板电脑只持续了10:38小时，这对一个工作日来说是足够的，但之后的储备就很紧张。另一方面，在负载下，平板电脑的运行时间相当长，超过4小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 29min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 9min
Huawei MatePad SE
5100 mAh		Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
7500 mAh		Huawei MatePad T10S
5100 mAh		Realme Pad
7100 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
19%
-28%
33%
-5%
Reader / Idle
2009
2373
18%
1354
-33%
1973
-2%
H.264
958
1151
20%
625
-35%
824
-14%
WiFi v1.3
638
909
42%
557
-13%
847
33%
679
6%
Load
249
239
-4%
175
-30%
230
-8%

Pros

+ 金属外壳
+ 相对较轻
+ 微型SD插槽
+ 真彩显示
+ 几乎没有发热
+ 宽频DRM L1

Cons

- 非常简单的相机
- 充电速度慢
- 多数情况下运行时间适中
- 软件有局限性

结论 - 更适合于家庭使用

在审查中。华为MatePad SE。测试设备由:
在审查中。华为MatePad SE。测试设备由:
数码港.com

如果你只是想找一款便宜的家用平板电脑，那么MatePad SE是不会错的。然而，你不应该在屏幕、性能，特别是摄像头方面有太高的期望。遗憾的是，华为的创新能力被贸易禁运严重遏制，因为早期的机型显示，中国人总是提供良好的性价比。另一方面，MatePad SE相当不显眼地与它的对手们相提并论。

此外，有些小的电池，使平板电脑很轻，只允许相对较短的运行时间。然而，如果你只想在家里使用这款平板电脑，附近总有一个电源插座，那么这一点应该不是那么关键，这款平板电脑在高负荷下可以持续很长时间。

在软件方面，你必须与华为自己的生态系统交朋友，它与Android ，但有一些限制。在我们的测试中也有一些小的错误。

我们喜欢它的金属外壳、低温、稳定的性能和良好的Wi-Fi速度。

如果你正在寻找一款简单的家用平板电脑，拥有漂亮的金属外壳，并且了解软件的特殊性，那么你将通过MatePad SE获得一款适合日常使用的10.4英寸平板电脑。

这款 真人纸牌也配备了一个轻巧的金属外壳。更重一点的是 三星的Galaxy Tab A8如果需要，它也可以支持LTE。

价格和可用性

在测试时，MatePad SE的售价略低于200欧元，，直接由制造商提供。.

在我们的贷款人cyberport.de上也能以这个优惠价格买到它。，而在notebooksbilliger上则要多付几欧元。.de和amazon.de。.

Huawei MatePad SE - 05/03/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
37 / 70 → 52%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 92%
Battery
89%
Display
87%
Games Performance
14 / 78 → 18%
Application Performance
55 / 92 → 60%
Temperature
97%
Noise
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
47 / 85 → 56%
Average
69%
81%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为MatePad SE平板电脑评测--价格小，电池小
Florian Schmitt, 2023-01-30 (Update: 2024-08-15)