Notebookcheck Logo

Medion Erazer Beast X40回顾:配备RTX 4090的游戏笔记本

大修。

走大路,不走小路:通过酷睿i9-13900HX和GeForce RTX 4090笔记本电脑,Medion给这款笔记本提供了目前最新和最强大的硬件。该设备还具有快速的16:10屏幕(2,560 x 1,600),机械键盘和相当不错的电池寿命。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

尽管它属于游戏笔记本电脑的范畴,但Erazer Beast X40也被设想用于其他非常苛刻的使用场景。必要的计算性能是由Raptor Lake CPU和Ada Lovelace GPU提供的。与它的前辈 相比,这款笔记本电脑已经得到了重大改造:Medion为其提供了新的屏幕宽高比(16:10而不是16:9),一个可选水冷的冷却系统,以及一个机械键盘。

X40基于同方的裸机(GM7PX9N),与用于XMG Neo 17的裸机基本相同。 XMG Neo 17.它的竞争对手是 MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Alienware x17 R2 P48E, Razer Blade 16 (2023年初)华硕ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY.

Medion Erazer Beast X40 (Erazer Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 160 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 2040 MHz, RAM: 2375 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
17.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, G-Sync, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, 1024 GB 
, 1884 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1x combo audio jack, 1x mic-in, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 33 x 383 x 272
Battery
99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Mechanical, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.88 kg, Power Supply: 986 g
Price
4499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Medion Erazer Beast X40
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg33 mm17.00"2560x1600
89 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.5 kg23 mm17.30"3840x2160
91.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.99 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.6 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg27 mm17.00"2560x1600
89.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3.1 kg20.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.1 kg30.8 mm18.00"2560x1600

外壳 - Erazer有一个金属底盘

Erazer Beast X40摒弃了响亮和华丽的外观,而采用了低调的设计,在专业环境中不会引人注目。与它的前辈一样,X40使用黑色金属底盘,并进行了磨砂处理。底座部分覆盖着一层抓地力强的橡胶涂层。键盘背光(RGB)以及后部排气口上方的两个完全可配置的LED条(RGB)为笔记本电脑提供了一抹色彩。电池是用螺丝钉固定的,而不是用胶水粘住的,一旦取下底盖,就可以接触到其余的内部零件。

在我们的评测单元上,我们没有注意到任何做工问题。机箱中的缝隙很好,也很紧密,制造过程中没有留下多余的材料。几乎不可能扭动底座部分。盖子可以稍微弯曲,但弯曲的程度是完全可以接受的。铰链将显示屏牢牢地固定在原处,并允许屏幕向后折叠,折叠的角度可达140度左右。笔记本电脑的盖子不能用一只手打开。

Medion Erazer Beast X40是我们比较中最紧凑的设备之一,在重量方面处于中间位置。

尺寸比较

399 mm 294 mm 30.8 mm 3.1 kg399.23 mm 299.57 mm 20.9 mm 3.1 kg397 mm 330 mm 23 mm 3.5 kg383 mm 272 mm 33 mm 2.9 kg381.7 mm 272.8 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg355 mm 244 mm 21.99 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

规格--野兽的Thunderbolt 4

Erazer有三个USB-A端口(2个USB 3.2 Gen 1,1个USB 3.2 Gen 2)和一个USB-C端口(Thunderbolt 4)。后者不支持Power Delivery,但能够输出DisplayPort信号。笔记本电脑总共有两个视频输出(HDMI 2.1,DP),两个音频插孔(耳机和麦克风输入),一个千兆以太网端口和一个肯辛顿插槽。在后面,你还会发现用于可选的水冷解决方案的连接器。

在左边:Kensington插槽,USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A),麦克风输入,组合式音频插孔
在左边:Kensington插槽,USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A),麦克风输入,组合式音频插孔
在右边:SD读卡器,2个USB 3.2 Gen 1(USB-A)。
在右边:SD读卡器,2个USB 3.2 Gen 1(USB-A)。
背面:2个水冷接口,Thunderbolt 4(USB-C;DisplayPort),HDMI 2.1,千兆以太网,电源接口。
背面:2个水冷接口,Thunderbolt 4(USB-C;DisplayPort),HDMI 2.1,千兆以太网,电源接口。

SD卡阅读器

SD读卡器是一个中等速度的模型,与我们的AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60参考卡一起使用,在传输250张每张约5MB的JPEG图像时,设法达到77MB/s的速度,在复制大块数据时达到86MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)
182.9 MB/s +138%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
125 MB/s +62%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s +24%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
83.5 MB/s +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
69 MB/s -10%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)
220.6 MB/s +157%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
207.6 MB/s +141%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s +39%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
86.2 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s

连接性

在最佳条件下(周围没有其他Wi-Fi设备,笔记本电脑和服务器PC之间距离较短),Erazer通过Wi-Fi提供了出色的传输速率,因为Medion决定采用英特尔AX211 Wi-Fi 6E模块。有线网络连接由Realtek RTL8125千兆以太网芯片处理,其速度高达2.5Gbit/s。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1582 (1517min, 1518.74P1 - 1636max) MBit/s +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1466 (748min - 1542max) MBit/s +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1364 (1079min - 1473max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)
1235 MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1921, n=238)
1233 MBit/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1155 (495min - 1441max) MBit/s -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
MediaTek RZ608
936 (898min - 971max) MBit/s -31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1890 (1843min - 1936max) MBit/s +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1578 (1516min - 1627max) MBit/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1545 (1508min, 1510.9P1 - 1569max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)
1383 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=238)
1379 MBit/s -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1328 (1093min - 1448max) MBit/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
MediaTek RZ608
967 (949min - 978max) MBit/s -39%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1371 (1036-1505)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1283-1580)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1364 (1079-1473)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1582 (1517-1636)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1155 (495-1441)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (898-971)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1441 (748-1542)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1578 (1516-1627)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1545 (1508-1569)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1327 (1093-1448)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (949-978)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1890 (1843-1936)

网络摄像头

210万像素的网络摄像头能以1,920 x 1,080的最大分辨率捕捉图像。它在色彩准确性方面有所欠缺:摄像头产生的色彩与参考色有很大偏差。网络摄像头上没有机械的隐私快门。

ColorChecker
12.6 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast X40: 8.69 ∆E min: 3.5 - max: 14.3 ∆E

辅料

笔记本电脑除了通常的文件和电源适配器外,没有其他附件。Medion提供了一个可选的外部水冷却解决方案,价格约为250欧元(270美元),该公司也提供给我们进行测试。

这个小型冷却装置相当容易使用:只需将蒸馏水注入其中,连接电缆和管道,然后将其打开。笔记本电脑和外部冷却装置通过蓝牙相互通信,连接会自动建立。笔记本电脑的充电器为X40和冷却装置提供电源。水管是用磁力固定的--不需要紧固螺丝。然而,当你断开水管连接时,可能会有几滴水漏出。

维护

要拆下底盖,你需要解开底面的所有螺丝,以及背面水冷接头旁边的另外两个螺丝。之后,底盖可以通过排气口急速拉开。卸下盖子可以让你接触到内存插槽(两个都在使用)、两个PCIe 4.0固态硬盘、Wi-Fi模块、风扇、BIOS电池和可充电电池。

Medion Erazer Beast X40的内部结构
Medion Erazer Beast X40的内部结构

担保

Medion为Erazer提供两年的保修。有升级选项,但必须在Medion的网上商店与笔记本电脑一起购买。购买笔记本电脑后,你不能升级或延长保修期。将保修期延长一年需要花费近200欧元(216美元)。

输入设备 - 带Cherry MX开关的机械键盘

键盘

机械键盘通常以其精确的输入和反馈以及优质的打字感觉而闻名--这在X40的键盘上也不例外。它的Cherry MX开关提供了一个适度的行程和一个听觉和触觉的启动点。当你打字时,键盘不会弯曲。有两个功能键可以让你把每个键的RGB照明调整到四个亮度级别中的一个。总的来说,Erazer Beast X40有一个全方位的奇妙键盘。

触摸板

尺寸约为15.5 x 10厘米(6.1 x 3.9"),多点触控点击板有一个光滑的表面,让你的手指轻松滑过。它提供了一个短的行程和一个明显的点击点。触摸板的上角有状态指示灯。点击左边的LED灯将启用或禁用整个触摸板,而右边的LED灯只用于打开或关闭触摸板的右半部分。

野兽X40的键盘
野兽X40的键盘

显示屏 - QHD+,长宽比为16:10

子像素
子像素

17英寸亚光IPS显示屏(2,560 x 1,440)具有16:10的长宽比,并以足够的亮度、快速响应时间、高刷新率(240Hz)和没有PWM闪烁而脱颖而出。但是它的对比度没有达到人们认为的好水平(>1,000:1)。

该面板支持G-Sync,这项技术有助于显示器的刷新率动态地适应GPU输出的帧率。这旨在提供更流畅的观看体验,特别是在游戏时。

377
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
369
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NE170QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 398 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 377.2 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 384 cd/m²
Contrast: 853:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.74
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.017
Medion Erazer Beast X40
BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18"
Display
24%
24%
0%
10%
21%
Display P3 Coverage
68.6
94.9
38%
98.5
44%
69
1%
79.2
15%
97.2
42%
sRGB Coverage
99.8
99.9
0%
100
0%
99.8
0%
99.8
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.4
92.4
33%
89.7
29%
69.6
0%
79.6
15%
84.9
22%
Response Times
-248%
-9%
12%
-17%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
11.3 ?(5.4, 5.9)
38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n)
-240%
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
42%
10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7)
4%
12.4 ?(6.4, 6)
-10%
5.41 ?(2.57, 2.84)
52%
Response Time Black / White *
7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2)
26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n)
-255%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-60%
6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6)
19%
9.2 ?(5.2, 4)
-23%
8.62 ?(3.68, 4.94, n)
-15%
PWM Frequency
2380 ?(100)
Screen
78886%
-6%
11%
-22%
-92%
Brightness middle
384
606
58%
456.8
19%
415
8%
365.4
-5%
490
28%
Brightness
377
602
60%
437
16%
399
6%
344
-9%
468
24%
Brightness Distribution
90
93
3%
83
-8%
90
0%
85
-6%
86
-4%
Black Level *
0.45
0.0001
100%
0.35
22%
0.43
4%
0.29
36%
0.54
-20%
Contrast
853
6060000
710334%
1305
53%
965
13%
1260
48%
907
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.05
4.8
-134%
3.7
-80%
1.44
30%
3.17
-55%
4.97
-142%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.64
8.2
-125%
6.42
-76%
2.33
36%
7.69
-111%
11.02
-203%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.74
1.8
-143%
0.66
11%
0.89
-20%
0.51
31%
2.97
-301%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
6.5
-183%
2.6
-13%
1.8
22%
5.3
-130%
7.2
-213%
Gamma
2.017 109%
2.63 84%
2.3 96%
2.132 103%
2.18 101%
2.161 102%
CCT
6546 99%
6596 99%
6108 106%
6327 103%
5879 111%
6515 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
26221% / 50682%
3% / -0%
8% / 9%
-10% / -15%
-17% / -52%

* ... smaller is better

这款显示器在开箱后就已经有了很好的色彩还原能力。它的平均色差大约为2,明显低于被认为是好的阈值(Delta E < 3)。校准显示器后,平均色差降至0.74,并使灰度更加平衡。该面板能够覆盖整个sRGB色彩空间,但不能覆盖AdobeRGB和DCI-P3。一些竞争性笔记本电脑上的显示屏在色彩覆盖方面表现更好。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(已校准)。
CalMAN:灰度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
Medion Erazer Beast X40与sRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Beast X40与sRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Beast X40与AdobeRGB的比较
Medion Erazer Beast X40与AdobeRGB的比较
Medion Erazer Beast X40 vs P3
Medion Erazer Beast X40 vs P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
7.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.3 ms rise
↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.4 ms rise
↘ 5.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS面板具有宽广的视角,从任何位置都可以轻松阅读。只要太阳不是太亮,该显示屏在户外肯定是可用的。

在户外使用X40
在户外使用X40
视角
视角

表现 - 猛禽湖与阿达-洛夫莱斯的结合

尽管它的设计主要是考虑到QHD+游戏,但Erazer Beast X40在视频编辑和渲染等应用中也有不错的表现。所需的计算能力由Raptor Lake和Ada Lovelace提供。本评论中的X40型号可以以大约4500欧元(4856美元)的价格买到。但Medion还提供了一个略低规格的配置(RTX 4080和1TB SSD;其他方面相同),价格为3500欧元(3777美元)。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
Nvidia系统信息

测试条件

有三种制造商指定的性能模式:办公室、平衡和涡轮。我们使用Turbo模式进行基准测试,使用Office模式进行电池寿命测试,并在两种情况下都启用了Nvidia Optimus。完成这些测试后,我们在启用dGPU模式和连接外部水冷装置的情况下运行了更多基准测试。你可以在对比表中找到这些额外测试的结果,但在评级时不考虑这些结果。

用户可以使用电源按钮旁边的一个专用按钮在三种模式之间进行切换。一个LED状态指示灯显示当前启用的模式。也可以使用预装的控制中心软件创建定制的配置文件。例如,你可以指定CPU的功率限制、GPU的TGP、温度限制等等。

注意:我们在控制中心软件中使用的是英文用户界面,因为德文翻译有一些问题。该软件可以让你在两种语言之间切换。

涡轮模式 平衡模式 办公模式
功率限制1 160瓦 160瓦 160瓦
功率限制2 160瓦 160瓦 160瓦
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心
Erazer控制中心

处理器

Core i9-13900HX (Raptor Lake)由八个性能核心(超线程,2.2至5.4 GHz)和十六个效率核心(无超线程,1.6至3.9 GHz)组成,总共有40个逻辑核心。获得的基准测试结果略高于CPU能够产生的平均水平。

在插上Erazer Beast X40的情况下,其CPU在高至最大的时钟速度下运行Cinebench R15。在电池供电的情况下,单线程性能只略微降低(得分:228),而多线程性能则受到了相当大的打击(得分:1154)。循环运行Cinebench 15表明,在主电源上,CPU能够以高提升速度持续运行。

使用水冷装置并没有带来任何性能上的大幅提升。尽管如此,在持续的多线程负载下,CPU的性能更加稳定(CB15循环),CPU的平均温度下降了约5℃(9℉)。

多线程(插入式)
多线程(插入式)
单线程(插入式)
单线程(插入式)

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

02655307951060132515901855212023852650291531803445371039754240450547705035Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4532 (4437.05-4828.15)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2889 (2849.61-2917.79)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX; dGPU, Cooling: Ø4680 (4646.3-4744.4)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4735 (4684.94-4780.69)
循环运行CB15时的CPU时钟速度(涡轮模式)
循环运行CB15时的CPU时钟速度(涡轮模式)
在循环中运行CB15时的CPU时钟速度(平衡模式)
在循环中运行CB15时的CPU时钟速度(平衡模式)
循环运行CB15时的CPU时钟速度(办公室模式)
循环运行CB15时的CPU时钟速度(办公室模式)
循环运行CB15时的CPU时钟速度(涡轮模式、DGPU、水冷)。
循环运行CB15时的CPU时钟速度(涡轮模式、DGPU、水冷)。
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
84.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
83.6 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
82.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
81 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
77.7 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
72.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63.5 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
60.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
47.6 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
33277 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
31572 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30932 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
30886 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (24270 - 32623, n=22)
28225 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
26736 (22394.1min - 26736.1max) Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)
21651 Points -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18870 (18654.1min - 18869.7max) Points -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14152 Points -54%
Single Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2140 Points +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2100 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
2083 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1867 - 2105, n=19)
2044 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2035 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2029 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1905 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)
1877 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1557 Points -23%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
12648 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
12073 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
11788 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11780 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (9152 - 12541, n=20)
10766 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
8697 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
7169 Points -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5549 Points -53%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
824 Points +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
803 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
793 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (722 - 810, n=20)
784 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
782 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
742 Points -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
727 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
605 Points -23%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
5227 (4889.98min - 5226.71max) Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4828 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
4823 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
4744 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4781 (4684.94min - 4780.69max) Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4529 (4463.29min - 4528.99max) Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (3913 - 4970, n=21)
4522 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2918 (2849.61min - 2917.79max) Points -40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2296 Points -52%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
312 Points +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
300 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
297 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
295 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
278 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (247 - 304, n=21)
292 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
274 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
272 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
248 Points -16%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
216 Seconds * -108%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
173.6 Seconds * -67%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * -65%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (101 - 153, n=21)
117.9 Seconds * -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
114 Seconds * -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
104 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
103 Seconds * +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
102 Seconds * +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
100 Seconds * +4%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
127295 MIPS +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
123833 MIPS +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
121921 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
121631 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (90675 - 127283, n=20)
111796 MIPS -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
109330 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS -31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
69146 MIPS -43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64439 MIPS -47%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
7084 MIPS +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
6918 MIPS 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6897 MIPS 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6890 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (6340 - 7177, n=20)
6848 MIPS -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6445 MIPS -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5872 MIPS -15%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5803 MIPS -16%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
20847 Points +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
20634 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
20350 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
20182 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (17614 - 21075, n=21)
19809 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
18152 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points -26%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13717 Points -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10126 Points -50%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2099 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
2047 Points +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2043 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2036 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1345 - 2093, n=21)
1988 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1878 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
1805 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1590 Points -22%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
33.4 fps +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
32.7 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
32.7 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30.5 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)
29.1 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
28.7 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps -24%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
21.4 fps -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
17.5 fps -43%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
56 s * -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
47.5 s * -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
46.5 s * -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
43 s *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)
42.5 s * +1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
40.7 s * +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
38.2 s * +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
36 s * +16%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4808 sec * -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4323 sec * -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.4121 sec * -3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.4033 sec * -0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)
0.402 sec * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4014 sec *
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
0.3954 sec * +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.3793 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4828 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
261 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
297 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
11780 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
782 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2035 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
30932 Points
Help
Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
97.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
97.4 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
94.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.3 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
91.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
88.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
74.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
52.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
28957 KRay/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
28701 KRay/s +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)
27615 KRay/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
27524 KRay/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
25857 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (17589 - 27615, n=21)
24097 KRay/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)
21640 KRay/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
16115 KRay/s -41%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9759 KRay/s -65%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
144303 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
138190 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)
136688 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
134221 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
125944 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (88686 - 137015, n=21)
120602 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)
106090 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
98800 Points -26%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
43695 Points -67%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
7093 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
6949 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)
6799 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
6758 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
6350 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (4362 - 7029, n=21)
6061 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)
4852 MB/s -28%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3504 MB/s -48%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
3422 MB/s -49%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
141427 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
139649 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)
134571 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (125644 - 141385, n=21)
133924 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
133226 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
133197 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)
116237 Points -13%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
107120 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
102167 Points -23%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
17117 Points +7%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
17057 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)
16037 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
15947 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15813 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (12334 - 17179, n=21)
14889 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)
13175 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
12783 Points -20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
10402 Points -35%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
71038 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
70739 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)
69202 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
67872 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
63308 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (43850 - 69202, n=21)
59821 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
54060 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)
53471 Points -21%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
27285 Points -60%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (89413 - 237881, n=21)
139015 MB/s +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
136551 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
135833 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
134166 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)
129440 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
127548 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
125644 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)
109176 MB/s -14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
106367 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
2059 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
2030 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)
1950 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
1928 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
1850 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1284 - 1958, n=21)
1755 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)
1349 MB/s -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
1203 MB/s -38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
845 MB/s -56%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15573 KRay/s +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15540 KRay/s +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)
15279 KRay/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
14995 KRay/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
13844 KRay/s -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (9481 - 15279, n=21)
13066 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)
11654 KRay/s -22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
8529 KRay/s -43%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
5748 KRay/s -62%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
50834 MPixel/s +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (42994 - 51994, n=21)
48439 MPixel/s +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)
44270 MPixel/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
44016 MPixel/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
43025 MPixel/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
40896 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)
39919 MPixel/s -7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
34534 MPixel/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
30226 MPixel/s -30%

系统性能

这个迅捷的系统内部的硬件为游戏和渲染等任务提供了足够的性能。这款笔记本电脑配备了32GB的内存,以双通道模式运行。而且内存的传输率是典型的DDR5-4800内存。更重要的是,在我们的测试中,该系统还提供了极佳的PCMark结果。

该存储器在双通道模式下运行。
该存储器在双通道模式下运行。
PCMark 10 / Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
9331 Points +18%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8884 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
8764 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (7690 - 9331, n=8)
8466 Points +7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8186 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
7932 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7888 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6966 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11761 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
11512 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (10972 - 11983, n=8)
11364 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
11275 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
11205 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11078 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)
10836 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9740 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
11680 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
11321 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9038 - 11680, n=8)
10423 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
10144 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)
9878 Points -13%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9851 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9564 Points -16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
8271 Points -27%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
16424 Points +55%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
16395 Points +55%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
14535 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (10605 - 16395, n=8)
14052 Points +32%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
13098 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)
12030 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
10611 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9848 Points -7%
CrossMark / Overall
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
2150 Points +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2139 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2125 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1825 - 2295, n=8)
2107 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2080 Points -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1903 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)
1899 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1699 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1592 Points -25%
CrossMark / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
2014 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
1978 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1977 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1666 - 2166, n=8)
1960 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1909 Points -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1808 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)
1801 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1646 Points -17%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1509 Points -24%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2455 Points +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2423 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
2392 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2389 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (2162 - 2514, n=8)
2379 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
2095 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)
2083 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1867 Points -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1780 Points -25%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
1902 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1861 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
1857 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1441 - 2275, n=8)
1833 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)
1699 Points -9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1666 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1634 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1405 Points -24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1342 Points -28%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4936 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6075 points
PCMark 10 Score
7932 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77060 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (67716 - 78835, n=21)
75033 MB/s +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67716 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67561 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)
64907 MB/s -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63863 MB/s -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53861 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
50231 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84869 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (73998 - 88462, n=21)
82199 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74518 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74284 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)
68658 MB/s -8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
62807 MB/s -15%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57237 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51403 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
80441 MB/s +23%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (65472 - 77045, n=21)
73168 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67449 MB/s +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)
66727 MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
65472 MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
60389 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55263 MB/s -16%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54443 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.5 ns * -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98.4 ns * -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * -6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
92.8 ns * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
90.8 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
89.3 ns * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
89.1 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)
86.3 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们的标准化延迟监测测试,包括网页浏览、4K视频播放和Prime95高负荷,发现了一些问题。该系统似乎不适合于实时视频和音频处理。我们希望未来的软件更新将有助于纠正这些问题。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4710.9 μs * -107%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4362 μs * -92%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2448.6 μs * -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2275.2 μs *
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1101.9 μs * +52%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1095 μs * +52%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

Medion为我们的X40评测单元配备了两块由Phison制造的1TB SSD(PCIe 4.0,M.2-2280)。其中一个作为系统驱动器,另一个用于数据存储。不仅这些固态硬盘没有形成RAID配置,而且笔记本电脑本身也不支持RAID。所包含的驱动器并不属于市场上最好的固态硬盘。即便如此,它们仍然提供了很好的性能。另一个值得一提的事情是,我们没有注意到任何由热节流引起的性能下降。

这款笔记本电脑配备了两块固态硬盘。
这款笔记本电脑配备了两块固态硬盘。
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7077 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4783 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 962.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 705.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3250 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3156 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.25 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 265.1 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
78.3 pt
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
 
72.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
71.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
69.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
62.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
60.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
59.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
54.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5598 (5462.22min - 5597.85max) MB/s +79%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4931 (4875.77min - 4930.83max) MB/s +58%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4842 (4719.64min - 4842.11max) MB/s +55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3872 (3855.82min - 3871.97max) MB/s +24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3844 (3257.93min - 3843.87max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)
3487 MB/s +12%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3127 - 3582, n=3)
3287 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3127 (2701.13min - 3126.72max) MB/s
seq write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7533 (7482.85min - 7532.79max) MB/s +134%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4819 (4728.89min - 4819.25max) MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4242 (4225.7min - 4241.7max) MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4199 (3998.61min - 4199.12max) MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)
3797 MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3242 (1498min - 3241.78max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3218 (2245.63min - 3218.43max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (2507 - 3714, n=3)
3146 MB/s -2%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
13195 (9412.86min - 13194.8max) MB/s +90%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11242 (10740.3min - 11242.2max) MB/s +62%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
10774 (9137.92min - 10774max) MB/s +55%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (6956 - 6976, n=3)
6966 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
6956 (5970.17min - 6956.25max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6872 (4963.33min - 6872.25max) MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6384 (5573.36min - 6384.17max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)
6328 MB/s -9%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9942 (9912.92min - 9941.76max) MB/s +99%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
8404 (8165.05min - 8403.71max) MB/s +69%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8227 (8104.29min - 8226.71max) MB/s +65%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5043 (5032.12min - 5043.21max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
4986 (4917.82min - 4985.65max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)
4823 MB/s -3%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3723 - 5011, n=3)
4573 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4244 (427.59min - 4244.22max) MB/s -15%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
83.1 (79.37min - 83.07max) MB/s +46%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
79.3 (77.82min - 79.25max) MB/s +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
79.1 (78.08min - 79.08max) MB/s +39%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (56.8 - 84.3, n=3)
66.1 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)
65.8 MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
57.5 (57.09min - 57.53max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
56.8 (53.63min - 56.77max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
56.5 (49.8min - 56.49max) MB/s -1%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (275 - 295, n=3)
284 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
283 (273.23min - 283.12max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)
222 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
220 (56.84min - 219.56max) MB/s -22%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
213 (205.52min - 212.72max) MB/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
195.1 (194.02min - 195.09max) MB/s -31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
170.2 (168.21min - 170.2max) MB/s -40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
103.7 (103.17min - 103.74max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4483 (4465.42min - 4482.78max) MB/s +27%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3543 - 3578, n=3)
3557 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3543 (3529.91min - 3542.8max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3111 (2388.54min - 3111.42max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)
2555 MB/s -28%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1469 (1266.81min - 1469.47max) MB/s -59%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
874 (867.39min - 873.79max) MB/s -75%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
711 (692.26min - 710.64max) MB/s -80%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4383 (4358.15min - 4383.06max) MB/s +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3688 (3576.03min - 3687.54max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3398 - 3688, n=3)
3564 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)
2101 MB/s -43%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1424 (1251.47min - 1423.75max) MB/s -61%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1282 (960.6min - 1281.78max) MB/s -65%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
461 (442.02min - 461.29max) MB/s -87%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
350 (343.49min - 350.45max) MB/s -91%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9218 Points +9%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (8477 - 8906, n=3)
8641 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
8477 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7311 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)
6737 Points -21%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4941 Points -42%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4850 Points -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4364 Points -49%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3428 Points +1%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3332 - 3464, n=3)
3397 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3394 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3308 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)
2441 Points -28%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2035 Points -40%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1948 Points -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1858 Points -45%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4113 Points +21%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3399 - 3707, n=3)
3563 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3399 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)
3113 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2428 Points -29%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
2137 Points -37%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1877 Points -45%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1691 Points -50%
Seq Read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9511 MB/s +98%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
7888 MB/s +64%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
6561.69 MB/s +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5157 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5144.76 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)
4944 MB/s +3%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (4774 - 5200, n=3)
4925 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
4799.93 MB/s
Seq Write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7181 MB/s +83%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
5041 MB/s +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3925.33 MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3290 - 4309, n=3)
3842 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3733 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)
3720 MB/s -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
3480.87 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3058.47 MB/s -22%
4K Read
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (60.6 - 97.3, n=3)
76 MB/s +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
72.8 MB/s +20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
69.21 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
68.93 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
60.64 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
58 MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
49.65 MB/s -18%
4K Write
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (168.4 - 294, n=3)
213 MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
184.49 MB/s +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
177.9 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
175.47 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
157.01 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
144.8 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
114.7 MB/s -35%
4K-64 Read
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2853.84 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2842.96 MB/s 0%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (2784 - 2854, n=3)
2828 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2744.3 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)
1876 MB/s -34%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1223.07 MB/s -57%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1011 MB/s -65%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1011 MB/s -65%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3582.58 MB/s +27%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (2831 - 3086, n=3)
2966 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2830.74 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1944.47 MB/s -31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1604.89 MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1072 MB/s -62%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
981 MB/s -65%
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
0.085 ms *
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (0.078 - 0.086, n=3)
0.083 ms * +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)
0.05509 ms * +35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.044 ms * +48%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.036 ms * +58%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.034 ms * +60%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
0.03 ms * +65%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.028 ms * +67%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.082 ms * -257%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
0.066 ms * -187%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)
0.04843 ms * -111%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.035 ms * -52%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.025 ms * -9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.023 ms * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
0.023 ms *
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (0.013 - 0.023, n=3)
0.01967 ms * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

069013802070276034504140483055206210690075908280897096601035011040117301242013110Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R: Ø6904 (5576.5-6952.06)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø6785 (2053.41-13760.21)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6412 (5645.36-6872.58)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6279 (4891.05-6318.25)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0): Ø13136 (12495.08-13196.72)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0): Ø10730 (8845.37-10809.96)

图形卡

GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop 是Nvidia目前的旗舰移动GPU。它具有9,728个着色单元,256位内存总线和16,384 MB的高速GDDR6内存。RTX 4090有高达175瓦的TGP供其支配(150瓦+25瓦动态提升)--这已经是很高了。但在我们的Witcher 3 测试中,TGP并没有得到充分利用。

基准测试结果与(Optimus模式)持平,或略好于(dGPU模式)我们迄今为止从RTX 4090笔记本电脑平均看到的结果。这款笔记本电脑还支持高级优化模式。在dGPU和Optimus模式之间切换不需要重新启动计算机。

可选的水冷可以在一些基准测试和游戏中带来轻微的性能提升。Witcher 3例如,在我们的测试过程中,"DGPU "以更高的帧率运行。GPU的平均温度也比只使用空气冷却时低。

Fire Strike (插电,涡轮模式,Optimus)
Fire Strike (插电,涡轮模式,Optimus)
Fire Strike (在电池上,涡轮模式,Optimus)
Fire Strike (在电池上,涡轮模式,Optimus)
Fire Strike (插电,涡轮模式,dGPU)
Fire Strike (插电,涡轮模式,dGPU)
Fire Strike (插电,涡轮模式,dGPU,水冷)
Fire Strike (插电,涡轮模式,dGPU,水冷)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
99.4 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
96.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
96.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
95.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
92.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
91.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
81.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
70.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
67.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
62.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
69777 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
69211 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
68692 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)
67073 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (54073 - 73027, n=42)
65041 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
63818 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
56565 Points -18%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
44381 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
43823 Points -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points -37%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)
164399 Points +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
159724 Points +12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
150156 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
142552 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
142520 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (95671 - 164399, n=14)
142227 Points 0%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
49247 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
49220 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
48101 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (40259 - 53059, n=41)
46365 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)
46047 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
44759 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
40570 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
33120 Points -26%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
32849 Points -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points -30%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
22479 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
22254 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)
21900 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
21278 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
21167 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16950 - 23292, n=43)
20950 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
18441 Points -13%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
13455 Points -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
12684 Points -40%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
60717 points
3DMark 11 Performance
47487 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
66757 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
34788 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
19708 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)
21 Seconds * -50%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)
15 Seconds * -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
14 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9 - 19, n=39)
12.1 Seconds * +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU, Cooling)
12 Seconds * +14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)
11 Seconds * +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)
10 Seconds * +29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU)
10 Seconds * +29%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
36.7 Seconds * -93%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)
19 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU, Cooling)
19 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16 - 24, n=39)
18.3 Seconds * +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)
18 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)
17 Seconds * +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU)
18 Seconds * +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)
17 Seconds * +11%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)
215531 Points +8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
215425 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
215359 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (6841 - 237138, n=39)
201434 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
198772 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
190582 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
173311 Points -13%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
147189 Points -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
138625 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years)
125975 Points -37%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)
134644 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (49663 - 163089, n=28)
102459 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
90003 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
76932 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)
76039 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
75965 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years)
71890 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
71346 Points
Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 159996, n=9)
53177 Points +460%
Average of class Gaming
  (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)
48002 Points +405%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
9497 Points
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
213472 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
208453 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (160333 - 213472, n=10)
192750 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)
115603 Points -46%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (5.0.1)
3590 mpaths +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU)
3569 mpaths +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)
3551 mpaths
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
3533 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1982 - 3824, n=29)
3476 mpaths -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Cooling)
3335 mpaths -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
2655 mpaths -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years)
2181 mpaths -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5.0.1)
1880 mpaths -47%
GPU CUDA
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (5.0.1)
2644 mpaths +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)
2589 mpaths
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU)
2589 mpaths 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
2582 mpaths 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (1454 - 2797, n=29)
2537 mpaths -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Cooling)
2424 mpaths -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
1945 mpaths -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years)
1568 mpaths -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5.0.1)
1384 mpaths -47%
CPU
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Cooling)
21230 mpaths +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)
21011 mpaths
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU)
20543 mpaths -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (5.0.1)
20438 mpaths -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (12404 - 25897, n=27)
20296 mpaths -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)
18935 mpaths -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years)
15070 mpaths -28%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK (5.0.1)
12463 mpaths -41%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )
1261 mpaths +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (v4.10.07 )
1252 mpaths 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
1252 mpaths
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU)
1244 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (873 - 1334, n=30)
1213 mpaths -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Cooling )
1122 mpaths -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years)
701 mpaths -44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )
511 mpaths -59%
CPU
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (v4.10.07 )
32727 ksamples +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Cooling)
32036 ksamples +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )
31821 ksamples 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )
31769 ksamples
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU)
31120 ksamples -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (18206 - 37629, n=30)
29643 ksamples -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=152, last 2 years)
21367 ksamples -33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )
14909 ksamples -53%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming
  (16.2 - 231, n=27, last 2 years)
37.3 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (31.3 - 37.6, n=8)
34.8 fps +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
34.28 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
33.6 fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
30 fps -11%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
59.5 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
56.7 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (50 - 59.9, n=8)
55.3 fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
49.97 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 59.9, n=27, last 2 years)
40.3 fps -32%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
610.71 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (529 - 687, n=7)
605 fps +14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
555.93 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
528.8 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (99.8 - 687, n=26, last 2 years)
416 fps -21%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
76.1 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
74.95 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (70.6 - 76.5, n=8)
73.4 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
62.41 fps -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.6 - 76.5, n=27, last 2 years)
47.6 fps -37%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
138.99 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
131.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (113.3 - 141.9, n=8)
131 fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
130.27 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 141.9, n=27, last 2 years)
107.9 fps -18%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
116.64 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
112.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (17.8 - 117.2, n=8)
101.4 fps -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
98.79 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.8 - 117.2, n=27, last 2 years)
73.4 fps -35%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
212.6 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
206.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (128 - 221, n=8)
198.6 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
177.9 fps -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 221, n=27, last 2 years)
125.8 fps -39%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

X40让用户在QHD+和最大设置下玩游戏。如果你把笔记本电脑连接到适当的显示器上,就有可能使用更高的分辨率。我们测试的游戏通常以类似于我们到目前为止从RTX 4090所看到的帧率运行。根据游戏的情况,你可能能够通过直接从GeForce GPU驱动显示器来获得更高的帧率。

Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
98.2 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
98.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W -1!
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.5 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
92.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
90.7 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
71.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60.5 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)
206 (178.6P1) fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)
204.9 (178min) fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
198.9 (190min, 191P1) fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (139.2 - 216, n=35)
198.5 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
195.1 (169min) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
176.8 (159min) fps -9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
128 (124min) fps -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121 (98min) fps -38%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)
151.6 (4.06min, 90.9P1) fps 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
151.3 (2.81min, 111.1P1) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)
149.8 (3.42min, 111.1P1) fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141.3 (4.69min, 100P1) fps -7%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
140.9 (3.54min, 83.3P1) fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140.7 (3.02min, 100P1) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (91.1 - 167.7, n=40)
138.6 fps -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
126.3 (5.94min, 90.9P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)
113 fps -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101.8 (18.4min, 71.4P1) fps -33%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
187.4 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU)
187.4 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU, Cooling)
186.8 fps +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
177.6 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)
176.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (122.2 - 201, n=40)
173.4 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
157.8 fps -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
127.8 fps -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
122.8 fps -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps -32%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU, Cooling)
378 (79.8min, 269P1) fps +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU)
376 (53.4min, 284P1) fps +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
373 (29.9min, 272P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
366 (29.1min, 263P1) fps 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
365 (90.9min, 268P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (233 - 421, n=39)
357 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
323 (61.7min, 222P1) fps -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)
227 fps -38%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
213 (71.8min, 156.1P1) fps -42%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
201 (41.3min, 148.1P1) fps -45%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
194.7 (160min) fps +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
190.2 (160.9min) fps +11%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
185.9 (157.5min) fps +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)
184.5 (155.3min) fps +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)
182.3 (154.8min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (115.7 - 220, n=42)
176.3 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
171.5 (144.2min) fps
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
158.9 (139.1min) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)
149.3 fps -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121.4 (106.8min) fps -29%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
142.8 fps +11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
137 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)
136.8 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)
136.6 fps +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134.2 fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134.1 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (77.8 - 166.2, n=46)
130.7 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
128.3 fps
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
112.9 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)
107.2 fps -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
80.3 fps -37%
Returnal
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (141 - 155, n=3)
147.3 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
146 (65min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 155, n=26, last 2 years)
84.7 fps -42%
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 119, n=3)
115.7 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
113 (67min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (39 - 119, n=21, last 2 years)
70.4 fps -38%
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (126 - 128, n=2)
127 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
126 (63min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (4 - 128, n=11, last 2 years)
73.5 fps -42%
Atomic Heart
1920x1080 Atomic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (128.6 - 166, n=3)
144.4 fps +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
128.6 (29min, 91.2P0.1, 105.8P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (10.2 - 166, n=18, last 2 years)
72.8 fps -43%
2560x1440 Atomic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (93.8 - 135, n=3)
112.2 fps +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.8 (31.5min, 68.5P0.1, 76P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (33.3 - 135, n=11, last 2 years)
68.8 fps -27%
Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
166.1 (7.97min, 44.8P0.1, 101.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (41.2 - 166.1, n=4)
93 fps -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.3 - 166.1, n=27, last 2 years)
73.7 fps -56%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125.9 (16.5min, 32.2P0.1, 83.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (40.6 - 125.9, n=4)
78.4 fps -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (29.8 - 125.9, n=18, last 2 years)
60.8 fps -52%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing AA:High T
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
65.5 (24.6min, 27.1P0.1, 39.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (52.2 - 67, n=3)
61.6 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.8 - 67, n=13, last 2 years)
46.3 fps -29%
Company of Heroes 3
1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (215 - 235, n=2)
225 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
215.2 (32.4P0.1, 87.8P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (43.8 - 235, n=16, last 2 years)
129 fps -40%
2560x1440 Maximum Settings
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (176.4 - 194.8, n=2)
185.6 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
176.4 (58.8P0.1, 92.22P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (62.9 - 194.8, n=9, last 2 years)
122 fps -31%
Sons of the Forest
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (85.7 - 93.9, n=2)
89.8 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85.7 (46.8min, 52.9P0.1, 64.8P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (14.8 - 93.9, n=19, last 2 years)
68.8 fps -20%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (85.2 - 89.6, n=2)
87.4 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85.2 (38min, 57.3P0.1, 64.9P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (45.5 - 89.6, n=9, last 2 years)
65.3 fps -23%

为了测试笔记本电脑是否能在较长时间内以基本稳定的帧率运行游戏,我们在不移动玩家角色的情况下以全高清和最大质量设置运行了大约60分钟的《Witcher 3 》。我们没有观察到帧率的任何下降。

Witcher 3 FPS graph

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø189.4 (179-197)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø198.9 (190-214)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.9 (141-179)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø119.7 (105-125)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø121.3 (111-128)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; dGPU, Cooling: Ø200 (186-211)
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU指标(Optimus)
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU指标(Optimus)
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU指标(dGPU,水冷)。
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU指标(dGPU,水冷)。
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 187.5 187.1 186 151.3 145.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 586.4 511.4 363.8 195.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 215 193.5 182.6 171.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 232 207 176.2 146.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 187.1 162.9 128.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 199 172 167 158 151
Strange Brigade (2018) 515 387 369 365 292
Hunt Showdown (2020) 367 285 262 168
Death Stranding (2020) 179 171.4 166.6 163 162.1
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 179.7 167.7 166.6 152.3 138.1
Back 4 Blood (2021) 403 309 309 327
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) 163 160 158 152 141
Riders Republic (2021) 209 200 185 179 146
Elex 2 (2022) 118.2 117.1 116.2 116.2 116.7
F1 22 (2022) 301 290 268 118.2 79.9
The Quarry (2022) 278 211 177.3 146.1 100.2
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 242 204 186.5 166.1 125.9
Returnal (2023) 178 171 164 146 113
Atomic Heart (2023) 205 161.8 144.2 128.6 93.8
Company of Heroes 3 (2023) 285.3 262.9 235.2 215.2 176.4
Sons of the Forest (2023) 96.1 90 87.9 85.7 85.2

排放物 - Erazer笔记本电脑可能会有相当大的噪音

噪声排放

笔记本电脑在日常使用中相对安静(如办公应用、网络浏览)。风扇甚至可能偶尔会停止转动。不足为奇的是,X40在重负荷下会变得相当响亮,在压力测试和Witcher 3 测试中产生高达53 dB(A)的噪音。尽管噪音水平相当高,但两个风扇产生的声音整体上是可以忍受的:嗖嗖的噪音伴随着铿锵的呼啸声,随着风扇速度的增加,逐渐变成了轻快的呼啸声。

当连接外部水冷装置时,笔记本电脑的风扇会减轻。然而,该装置本身也增加了整体噪音:尽管泵在使用时相对安静,但冷却器内的风扇会发出更多的喧嚣。综合考虑,我们认为使用水冷装置时,整体噪音更令人愉快。

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 29 / 35 dB(A)
Load
51 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204040.545.939.537.446.22540.938.339.439.63640.33147.649.746.748.244.152.74031.232.332.631.427.434.65030.732.829.130.326.333.36335.727.928.627.825.937.98031.32822.220.818.232.710028.123.518.615.114.83112529.424.820.117.116.432.516030.825.620.119.314.832.420033.326.123.12218.335.725035.525.22018.514.436.731536.723.719.813.612.637.940037.426.619.811.610.238.850039.72721.311.411.141.963041.827.622.610.610.642.880040.626.419.210.710.842.8100040.425.918.410.910.743125042.125.7181111.944.3160039.522.815.411.811.342.320003721.11412.611.439.4250037.920.913.512.412.640.4315039.719.113.412.812.942.2400039.518.313.913.313.242.1500036.716.113.813.613.239.8630033.114.413.713.313.236.4800030.714.51413.713.234.51000027.313.913.713.313.131.51250023.313.513.112.612.626.81600017.913.312.912.611.921.7SPL50.734.828.825.124.553.1N7.72.11.10.60.69.1median 36.7median 23.5median 18median 12.8median 12.6median 38.8Delta5.54.93.12.21.75.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMedion Erazer Beast X40
Medion Erazer Beast X40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX
Noise
-3%
13%
-3%
15%
4%
off / environment *
24
24.6
-3%
23
4%
26
-8%
22.7
5%
23.9
-0%
Idle Minimum *
25
29.2
-17%
23
8%
26
-4%
23.1
8%
23.9
4%
Idle Average *
29
29.2
-1%
23
21%
29
-0%
23.1
20%
32.6
-12%
Idle Maximum *
35
29.2
17%
23.6
33%
40
-14%
23.1
34%
32.6
7%
Load Average *
51
50.7
1%
39
24%
47
8%
31.9
37%
35.9
30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
53.3
-5%
51.6
-1%
52
-2%
52.5
-3%
Load Maximum *
53
61
-15%
51.3
3%
54
-2%
52.5
1%
55.8
-5%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常使用情况下,如运行办公软件和互联网浏览器,机箱温度保持在一个可接受的范围内。正如我们在压力测试和Witcher 3 测试中注意到的那样,笔记本电脑在负载下会明显发热,但不会过度发热。CPU的温度也没有让我们担心的理由。

Max. Load
 46 °C48 °C44 °C 
 45 °C45 °C40 °C 
 33 °C28 °C29 °C 
Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 39.8 °C
50 °C52 °C44 °C
38 °C40 °C36 °C
32 °C34 °C33 °C
Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 39.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Medion Erazer Beast X40
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat
13%
9%
-2%
4%
-0%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
40.6
15%
40
17%
49
-2%
49.6
-3%
54
-13%
Maximum Bottom *
52
41.1
21%
37.6
28%
52
-0%
42.4
18%
46
12%
Idle Upper Side *
30
26.2
13%
32.4
-8%
30
-0%
29.2
3%
30
-0%
Idle Bottom *
31
30.3
2%
31.4
-1%
33
-6%
32
-3%
31
-0%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

对于压力测试,我们让Prime95和FurMark运行了很长时间。它代表了一种极端情况,旨在评估系统在全负荷下的稳定性。CPU开始时的时钟速度很高(P-cores:4 GHz,E-cores:3.3 GHz),而GPU在1至1.5 GHz之间波动。大约5分钟后,CPU的P-cores和E-cores分别逐渐下降到2GHz和1.8GHz,但GPU的时钟攀升到大约2.3至2.4GHz。

压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
稳定性测试
稳定性测试
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

发言人

立体声扬声器听起来还不错,但几乎不产生任何低音。我们建议使用一副耳机或外部扬声器以获得更好的音频体验。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.441.5253638.23144.148.54027.431.35026.3316325.927.68018.23110014.839.212516.445.716014.848.220018.352.325014.46031512.660.740010.266.850011.176.563010.680.480010.877.9100010.778.1125011.973.7160011.376.3200011.474.9250012.674.4315012.971.2400013.270500013.278.7630013.277.1800013.2701000013.168.41250012.656.41600011.957.2SPL24.587.5N0.675.2median 12.6median 71.2Delta1.78.525.938.126.539.926.640.432.340.731.737.830.440.232.845.222.847.321.751.820.558.820.465.918.770.617.173.613.675.513.279.812.48211.28211.181.310.479.710.675.610.976.711.576.511.476.11273.812.17512.479.912.677.312.472.312.569.111.864.324.690.10.691.8median 12.4median 75.62.85.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMedion Erazer Beast X40MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - X40提供相当好的耐力

消耗功率

在Witcher 3 测试中,X40的功耗平均为280瓦,在压力测试中短暂地达到363瓦的峰值。虽然在Witcher 3 测试过程中,功耗略有下降,但在整个压力测试中,它的功耗是波动的。在空闲状态下,笔记本对内部硬件的耗电量相当正常。附带的充电器额定功率为330瓦,因此可以为笔记本电脑提供足够的电力。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 11 / 18 / 30 Watt
Load midlight 136 / 363 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Medion Erazer Beast X40
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-5%
-14%
31%
-42%
-30%
-18%
7%
Idle Minimum *
11
14
-27%
15.2
-38%
7
36%
24.1
-119%
17.3
-57%
16.9 ?(6 - 33.8, n=29)
-54%
Idle Average *
18
21.6
-20%
22.8
-27%
11
39%
28.5
-58%
27
-50%
Idle Maximum *
30
24.8
17%
49.8
-66%
17
43%
60
-100%
46
-53%
35.1 ?(11.6 - 57.9, n=29)
-17%
Load Average *
136
122.5
10%
121.2
11%
92
32%
128.7
5%
133
2%
130.5 ?(79 - 201, n=29)
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
280
265
5%
242
14%
221
21%
254
9%
Load Maximum *
363
418
-15%
273.7
25%
306
16%
323
11%
329
9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X40; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø280 (254-311)
Medion Erazer Beast X40; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø259 (234-307)
Medion Erazer Beast X40; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø19.1 (11.1-96.6)

Power consumption with external monitor

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X40; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø184 (178.8-203)
Medion Erazer Beast X40; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø222 (202-262)
Medion Erazer Beast X40; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø243 (231-254)
Medion Erazer Beast X40; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø285 (269-318)
Medion Erazer Beast X40; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø27.2 (20.4-72)

电池寿命

在Wi-Fi测试(使用脚本自动访问网站)和视频测试(以全高清方式循环播放H.264编码的短片《Big Buck Bunny》)中,17英寸笔记本电脑分别持续了6小时22分钟和6小时56分钟。在这两项测试中,笔记本电脑的所有省电功能都被禁用,屏幕亮度被设置为大约150cd/m²。当我们进行视频测试时,无线适配器也被禁用。

总的来说,对于这样一台高性能的笔记本电脑,Erazer的电池寿命非常好。它可以超过大多数竞争对手,甚至那些具有相同电池容量的竞争对手。

该电池的容量为99.8Wh。
该电池的容量为99.8Wh。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
9h 25min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 110)
6h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 54min
Medion Erazer Beast X40
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-18%
-13%
15%
-63%
-13%
-7%
Reader / Idle
565
533
-6%
722
28%
234
-59%
H.264
416
358
-14%
398
-4%
419
1%
WiFi v1.3
382
319
-16%
365
-4%
537
41%
117
-69%
428
12%
Load
114
86
-25%
81
-29%
109
-4%
46
-60%
56
-51%
Witcher 3 ultra
53

Pros

+ 16:10 QHD显示屏
+ 良好的色彩还原度
+ G-Sync
+ 先进的Optimus
+ 纤细的边框
+ 坚固的金属机箱
+ 高系统性能
+ 2个PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,每个1TB
+ 雷电4
+ 机械键盘
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 有水冷选项

Cons

- 显示屏可以使用更多的对比度
- 负载下声音大
- 没有电源传输

结论 - 卓越的高端游戏笔记本

Erazer Beast X40是由Medion公司友好地提供的。
Erazer Beast X40是由Medion公司友好地提供的。

Medion Erazer Beast X40是一款专为高要求使用场景设计的笔记本电脑,如视频编辑、渲染和游戏。这些应用所需的计算能力是由目前最强大的CPU-GPU组合之一提供的:一个 酷睿i9-13900HX搭配 GeForce RTX 4090.

该处理器和显卡能够在高时钟速度下持续运行,而且X40产生的热量和噪音对于这类设备来说相当正常。

总而言之,Erazer Beast X40是一款引人注目的笔记本电脑,适合游戏和其他高要求的应用。

哑光的17英寸16:10显示屏(QHD,IPS,240Hz,G-Sync,sRGB)在大多数情况下看起来很棒。唯一的缺点是,它的对比度略微太低。极好的机械键盘(带RGB照明)使笔记本电脑看起来更有吸引力。那些从未使用过机械键盘的人将获得全新的打字体验。笔记本电脑上的Thunderbolt 4端口开辟了扩展选项(如外部GPU,对接解决方案),但不支持Power Delivery。

Erazer Beast X40的一个可能替代品是 华硕ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY.华硕ROG以其18英寸16:10 QHD+面板、更多内存(64GB)和RAID支持而脱颖而出。它的价格约为4,800欧元(5,177美元),与 "野兽 "处于同一价格档次。如果钱不是问题,你可以看一下微星Titan GT77 HX 13V作为另一个选择。它的CPU性能略高,有三个SSD插槽,支持RAID和四个内存插槽。具有出色对比度的特别明亮的迷你LED显示屏是该设备的一个亮点。但整体包装将使你花费约6,600欧元(7,120美元)。

对水冷的评价

可选的水冷装置从根本上做到了它应该做的:提高性能(Medion承诺最多可提高10%)并减少热量和噪音。然而,在实际使用中,性能的提高是相当温和的,而且笔记本电脑被限制在一个固定的地方。剩下的唯一优势是更低的温度和噪音水平。这些好处是否值得多花250欧元(270美元),要由每个X40的所有者来决定。

价格和可用性

在德国,Medion Erazer Beast X40的评测配置可从Saturn.de获得。并标价为4,499欧元(4,856美元)。

Medion Erazer Beast X40 - 03/20/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 86%
Weight
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Battery
70 / 95 → 74%
Display
90%
Games Performance
100%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
83 / 95 → 87%
Noise
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
76%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Average
78%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Medion Erazer Beast X40回顾:配备RTX 4090的游戏笔记本
Sascha Mölck, 2023-03-24 (Update: 2023-03-24)