申克XMG Neo 17 M22的回顾。配备Cherry MX机械按键的高性能游戏笔记本

Name: SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
Brand: SCHENKER

最大的性能!

Schenker XMG Neo 17几乎没有任何妥协。有了AMD的Ryzen 9 6900HX和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU，游戏玩家有很多东西可以兴奋。在这篇评论中，我们将更详细地介绍M22模型的实际性能和新功能。

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/01/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Radeon Windows Ryzen (Zen)

XMG是三个字母，表示Schenker的旗舰游戏笔记本电脑。最新的Schenker XMG Neo 17，顾名思义，是一款17英寸的笔记本电脑，也属于这个系列。许多人会高兴地发现，与许多其他游戏笔记本电脑不同，Schenker使用了16:10的显示屏，稍微适合以工作为重点的任务。为了确保适当的性能水平，制造商安装了AMD全新的 Ryzen 9 6900HX与一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU在现代机箱中。因此，它是目前绝对最快的型号之一。有了32GB的DDR5内存和1TB的固态硬盘，该系统是很全面的。然而，由于价格约为4200美元，我们配置的Schenker XMG Neo 17并不完全便宜。

熟悉Schenker的读者会知道该制造商通常提供多少种配置选项。这也适用于这个模型，基本模型开始时使用相同的CPU和一个 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti笔记本GPU价格约为2950美元。

为了进行比较，我们还包括具有类似规格的设备。下表显示了这些笔记本电脑的列表。

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 (XMG Neo 17 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 85 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1590 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Nvidia 516.59, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, 2 of 2 occupied, up to 64 GB

Display

17.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 175 PPI, BOE0A99, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, 1024 GB

, M.2 SSD, 940 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek Audio

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 2x 3.5mm jack, Card Reader: Card reader (SD/SDHC/SDXC)

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek RZ608 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 381.7 x 272.8

Battery

99 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: Full HD
Primary Camera: 1 MPix Full HD webcam (Windows Hello supported)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: 6-row chiclet with Cherry MX Ultra Low Profile Tactile Switches, Keyboard Light: yes, AC adapter, driver USB thumbdrive, Schenker Control Center, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.79 kg, Power Supply: 980 g

Price

4200 EUR

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3.3 kg	23 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
89.9 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
87.2 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.2 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	20.5 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
86.8 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	25.9 mm	17.30"	3840x2160

底盘 - 非常罗布斯基地

从视觉上看，Schenker XMG Neo 17很明显是一台Schenker游戏笔记本电脑。它显得很微妙，省略了华丽的RGB灯光。哑光金属表面提供了优质的美感，尽管在很短的时间内指纹就会在上面显现。塑料是显示器边框和基本单元的首选材料。后者涂有柔软的触摸层。值得庆幸的是，它对指纹的敏感度略低。尽管尺寸不大，但底座却相当坚硬。在压力下，Neo 17显示出它的坚固性，只有在大量压力下才会略微弯曲。盖子的情况也是如此。居中的铰链可以胜任这项工作，并能很好地防止过度的摇晃。

尺寸比较

Schenker XMG Neo 17的重量为2.8公斤（6.17磅），在重量方面属于中等范围。强大的330瓦交流适配器几乎重达一公斤（980克/2.16磅）。

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 遗憾的是没有Thunderbolt 4

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22提供了很好的各种外部接口。三个USB-A端口分布在两侧，可以舒适地进行日常使用。同时，使用频率较低的端口，如HDMI或LAN，则位于背面。交流电适配器也插在这里，因此在通电时不会干扰到外围设备。不幸的是，由于交流适配器的插头是有角度的，当电源线朝设备后面的右侧走时，使用相邻的端口需要更多的耐心。此外，桶形插头可以非常容易地插入，使其容易发生意外的拔插。

左边：Kensington锁，USB-A 3.2 Gen 2，麦克风输入，耳机输出

背面。XMG OASIS插槽（带盖），USB-C 3.2 Gen 2×1（DisplayPort 1.4a），HDMI 2.1（兼容G-SYNC，HDCP 2.3），RJ45端口2.5 Gb/s（LAN），AC适配器

SD卡阅读器

Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22配备了一个支持USB-3速度的SD卡读卡器。在69MB/s的速度下，其性能还只是与同类设备相当。这两款华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo和 Razer Blade 17展示了我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）在UHS-II标准下能够达到的速度。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	155 MB/s +125%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	152 MB/s +120%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +39%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	69.1 (68.5^min - 72.99^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	69 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	68 MB/s -1%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	60 MB/s -13%

沟通

Schenker使用AMD RZ608作为我们设备中的Wi-Fi模块选择。在我们的测试中，该基本选项的性能无法超过其竞争对手。英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX200和Rivet Networks Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x可作为替代配置选项。我们还希望看到一个Wi-Fi 6E选项。有线网络可以达到2.5Gb/s，这是一个不错的选择。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1695 (1556^min - 1768^max) MBit/s +81%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1610 (1421^min - 1675^max) MBit/s +72%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)	1565 (988^min - 1682^max) MBit/s +67%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=148, last 2 years)	1230 MBit/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	936 (898^min - 971^max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek RZ608 (572 - 979, n=20)	860 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1692 (1567^min - 1738^max) MBit/s +75%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1691 (1589^min - 1731^max) MBit/s +75%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1672 (864^min - 1737^max) MBit/s +73%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)	1664 (1649^min - 1680^max) MBit/s +72%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=148, last 2 years)	1392 MBit/s +44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	967 (949^min - 978^max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek RZ608 (430 - 975, n=20)	886 MBit/s -8%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (949-978)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1691 (1589-1731)

Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1642 (864-1737)

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1663 (1649-1680)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1691 (1567-1738)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (898-971)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1610 (1421-1675)

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1565 (988-1682)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1695 (1556-1768)

网络摄像头

拥有良好网络摄像头的游戏笔记本电脑并不多。同样，Schenker XMG Neo 17的网络摄像头在色彩准确性和清晰度方面都有所欠缺，正如我们的图片所示。由于集成摄像头支持 "Windows Hello"，它可以作为一种认证方法。

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22: 10.28 ∆E min: 3.83 - max: 26 ∆E

辅料

Schenker XMG Oasis (Neo 15 (E22, Neo 15 (M22) and Neo 17 (M22)的外部水冷) — XMG绿洲（来源：Schenker）。

交付范围包括设备本身，一个330瓦的交流适配器，以及一个带有驱动程序的USB拇指驱动器。与Schenker Oasis一起，XMG Neo 17 M22提供一个可选的外部水冷解决方案。它可以在Schenker的网上商店单独购买，价格约为200美元。

维护

由于Schenker XMG Neo 17上没有维护舱口，无法快速进入内存和固态硬盘，因此更换这些部件有些困难。因此，底板必须被拆除，由于有许多塑料夹子进一步固定，这不是一项简单的任务。不管怎么说，底板可以从下面靠近通风口的地方用力一拉，就可以把它拆下来。

担保

Schenker XMG Neo 17有24个月的基本保修期，包括6个月的快速维修，并提供提货和退货服务。在订购过程中，有各种其他选项。如果支付大约150美元的费用，保修期可以延长到36个月，包括整个期间的快速维修服务。

输入设备 - Cherry MX开关 - 但并非适用于所有的按键？

键盘

这款17英寸笔记本电脑拥有一个基于Cherry MX开关的机械键盘。它们以其坚固性和极长的寿命而闻名。它们提供了一个只有1.8毫米的浅行程和一个明显的启动点，以获得良好的整体反馈。由于按键没有被阻尼，所以在打字时没有海绵状的感觉。机械键盘很少能提供安静的按键声响。这对XMG Neo 17来说也是如此。用户应该确定自己对明显的点击声的偏好和容忍度。那些喜欢安静的键盘的人可能想去别的地方看看。

对于Schenker为什么不在所有的按键上使用Cherry MX开关，有一个合理的解释。由于空间限制，第一行的半高键不能使用机械开关。这就留下了小键盘，它也依赖于标准的橡胶圆顶开关。根据制造商的说法，做出这个决定是为了减轻重量和降低成本。从声学上看，传统的开关明显更安静，而且特有的橡胶圆顶键的按压感觉有些受阻，尽管这种行为在这种情况下并不太明显。

键盘的背光可以通过控制中心进行调整。用户能够在各种效果和整个调色板之间进行选择。

触摸板

触摸板的尺寸为15.5 x 10厘米，非常大，对某些用户来说甚至可能太大。为了解决这个问题，输入面的右侧可以被禁用。在这种情况下，没有视觉或触觉线索显示触摸板的尽头。完全不需要点击板的用户也可以完全禁用它。这可以通过按两次左上角附近的白点来实现。玻璃表面经过轻微的磨砂处理，在手指出汗的情况下，用户体验会稍微舒适一些。我们在点击板靠近边缘的地方遇到了一个小问题，即点击板的反应能力。虽然这时它的反应会比较迟钝，但它的大尺寸大多可以弥补这一缺陷。键盘底部的两个按钮工作良好，提供相对安静的点击。

显示屏 - 240赫兹和16:10外形尺寸

Schenker XMG Neo 17上固定有17英寸240-Hz的IPS面板。16:10的外形尺寸比更常见的16:9的外形尺寸有一些优势，尤其是在生产力方面。

虽然根据我们的测量，该面板达到了399尼特的良好亮度水平，但一些竞争对手能够产生更好的结果。公平地说，我们的测量值稍微超过了XMG Neo 17的规格（数据表：380尼特）。对比度在一定程度上受到亮度和黑值的影响，导致比率仅为965：1。与MSI的两个竞争对手相比，这仍然是明显的好。

用户不太可能因为使用Schenker XMG Neo 17的PWM而出现眼睛疲劳。然而，有一些轻微的背光渗漏。不过，它只在靠近边缘的黑暗场景中变得明显。


385 cd/m²	373 cd/m²	384 cd/m²
407 cd/m²	415 cd/m²	399 cd/m²
416 cd/m²	408 cd/m²	407 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0A99 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 416 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 399.3 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 415 cd/m²
Contrast: 965:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.132

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16"	MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS AU Optronics B173ZAN06.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Display		2%	23%	21%	22%	21%
Display P3 Coverage	69	70.8 3%	99.4 44%	97.3 41%	98 42%	96.6 40%
sRGB Coverage	99.8	98.9 -1%	100 0%	100 0%	99.9 0%	99.8 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.6	73 5%	87.3 25%	84.9 22%	86.3 24%	85.8 23%
Response Times		43%	20%	-17%	-14%	27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7)	3.03 ?(1.28, 1.75) 72%	7.5 ?(2.1, 5.4) 31%	13.8 ?(6.3, 7.5) -28%	14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9) -35%	5.8 ?(1.6, 4.2) 46%
Response Time Black / White *	6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6)	5.28 ?(2.32, 2.96) 13%	5.6 ?(1.6, 4) 8%	6.4 ?(1.8, 4.6) -5%	5.6 ?(2, 3.6) 8%	5.6 ?(1.9, 3.7) 8%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-50%	5%	-7%	-58%	-42%
Brightness middle	415	280 -33%	503 21%	498 20%	459 11%	381 -8%
Brightness	399	275 -31%	486 22%	468 17%	434 9%	371 -7%
Brightness Distribution	90	79 -12%	84 -7%	80 -11%	88 -2%	84 -7%
Black Level *	0.43	0.4 7%	0.44 -2%	0.36 16%	0.44 -2%	0.52 -21%
Contrast	965	700 -27%	1143 18%	1383 43%	1043 8%	733 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.44	2.1 -46%	1.08 25%	1.77 -23%	2.97 -106%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.33	5.83 -150%	4.54 -95%	5.24 -125%	8.13 -249%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.89	1.58 -78%	0.6 33%	0.63 29%	1.03 -16%	2.53 -184%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	3.3 -83%	1.3 28%	2.4 -33%	4.9 -172%
Gamma	2.132 ^103%	2.13 ^103%	2.151 ^102%	2.14 ^103%	2.235 ^98%
CCT	6327 ^103%	7060 ^92%	6541 ^99%	7046 ^92%	6775 ^96%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-2% / -26%	16% / 11%	-1% / -3%	-17% / -34%	2% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

显示质量全面良好，我们没有观察到由于哑光显示层造成的颗粒感。此外，我们的测量结果表明，申克公司对Schenker Neo 17的显示屏进行了预校准。在出厂时，我们记录的灰度和彩色deltaE-2000值分别小于3，这是理想的范围。不管怎么说，我们能够通过手动校准显示器来进一步改善这些结果。Neo 17达到了宣传的99%的sRGB色彩空间覆盖率。然而，它只覆盖了69%的扩展色彩空间AdobeRGB和P3，使得它不适合用于非专业的照片和视频编辑。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.5 ms rise
6.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.1 ms rise
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

哑光显示涂层很适合户外使用。不管怎么说，在阴凉处的可读性是有限的。特别是，用户应避免在阳光直射下使用该屏幕。

视角测试显示的结果是IPS面板的特点。只有四个角落的图像显示了轻微的颜色偏差，在正常使用中不会出现这种偏差。

性能--AMD和Nvidia联合

随着淘宝网和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti笔记本GPU，我们的测试设备已经准备好在笔记本电脑的最大细节设置下进行最新的游戏。32GB的慷慨的系统内存配置为用户留下了足够的回旋余地，并支持新的DDR5标准。在典型的申克时尚中，用户可以根据自己的喜好调整配置，创建一个最佳系统。不过，CPU和17英寸面板是固定的。

测试条件

Schenker自己的控制中心包括预定义的风扇配置文件，这也会影响风扇的长期行为。为了获得最好的分数，我们在运行以下任何基准测试之前，将Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22设置为 "过度增压"。

处理器

该 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX是一个基于最新Zen-3架构的八核CPU。该SoC的时钟速度为3.3-4.9GHz提升，支持SMT，共有16个线程。然而，AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX面临着与英特尔第12代的激烈竞争，在直接比较中，英特尔第12代的速度会明显更快。

在我们的测试中，Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22的AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX能够保持稳定的性能水平。应该注意的是，在电池模式下，CPU性能下降了约10%。

更多基准测试可以在我们的 CPU比较表.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)

Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1562 (1542.73-1850.99)

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2490 (2422.04-2631.06)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3290 (2874.6-3561.89)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	84.8 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	84.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	80.6 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	66.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	61.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	60.5 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	58.7 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	58.2 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	23124 Points +63%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	22982 Points +62%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)	21953 Points +55%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	16887 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14152 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14085 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9709 - 15100, n=19)	13307 Points -6%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	10522 Points -26%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1913 Points +23%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	1908 Points +23%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1907 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=189, last 2 years)	1893 Points +22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	1743 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1566 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1516 - 1616, n=19)	1565 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1557 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	8828 Points +59%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	8667 Points +56%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8336 Points +50%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	6352 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5549 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5489 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (3742 - 5813, n=19)	5162 Points -7%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	4069 Points -27%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	742 Points +23%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	738 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	727 Points +20%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	699 Points +16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	640 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (595 - 631, n=19)	610 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	605 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	595 Points -2%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	3570 (3259.45^min - 3569.52^max) Points +55%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	3562 Points +55%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3433 Points +50%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	2631 (2422.04^min - 2631.06^max) Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2296 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2292 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1588 - 2411, n=19)	2163 Points -6%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	1851 Points -19%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	280 Points +13%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	278 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +12%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	258 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (241 - 261, n=19)	250 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	249 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	248 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	231 Points -7%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	307 Seconds * -42%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (212 - 357, n=21)	239 Seconds * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	220 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	216 Seconds *
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	197.6 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)	169.7 Seconds * +21%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	150.5 Seconds * +30%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	147 Seconds * +32%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	86541 MIPS +34%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	86234 MIPS +34%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)	85566 MIPS +33%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	64864 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64457 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64439 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (49526 - 65336, n=20)	60091 MIPS -7%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	47259 MIPS -27%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	6357 MIPS +8%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)	6318 MIPS +8%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	6256 MIPS +7%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	5926 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5872 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5090 - 6070, n=20)	5799 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5727 MIPS -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	5138 MIPS -12%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	16448 Points +62%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	16250 Points +60%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)	15073 Points +49%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	12463 Points +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10167 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10126 Points
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	9716 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (8313 - 10490, n=21)	9642 Points -5%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1949 Points +23%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	1923 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)	1897 Points +19%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	1797 Points +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	1746 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1594 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1590 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1523 - 1652, n=21)	1589 Points 0%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	26 fps +49%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.6 fps +46%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)	23.6 fps +35%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	18.5 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	17.5 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (12.6 - 18.7, n=20)	16.7 fps -5%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	12.7 fps -27%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	56 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (44.8 - 81.7, n=20)	53.1 s * +5%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years)	48.1 s * +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	45 s * +20%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	42.4 s * +24%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	41.7 s * +26%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	39 s * +30%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	39 s * +30%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20)	0.483 sec * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4808 sec *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4799 sec * -0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4671 sec * +3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4463 sec * +7%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)	0.4368 sec * +9%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4239 sec * +12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4194 sec * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6467

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

18211 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

77450 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

12294 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

17110

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

42219

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.49 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

22.72 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

94.53 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.91 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

26.44 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

101.16 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

248 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2296 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

151.39 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5549 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

605 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

14152 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1557 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	95.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	95.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	92.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	80.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	77.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	74.7 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60.9 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)	21914 KRay/s +36%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	21797 KRay/s +35%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	20004 KRay/s +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	16852 KRay/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	16115 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10950 - 17963, n=20)	15327 KRay/s -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9316 KRay/s -42%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5706 KRay/s -65%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	110093 Points +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	107354 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)	106726 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103794 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98800 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (71414 - 110797, n=20)	96546 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41656 Points -58%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	28086 Points -72%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5123 MB/s +50%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4945 MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)	4910 MB/s +43%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3547 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3422 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3378 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (2471 - 3804, n=20)	3301 MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1933 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)	117145 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	104920 Points +3%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103770 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102167 Points
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102056 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (84185 - 107544, n=20)	100656 Points -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98781 Points -3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	83594 Points -18%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)	13258 Points +4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	12969 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	12955 Points +1%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	12924 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	12783 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10970 - 13205, n=20)	12630 Points -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9927 Points -22%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	7257 Points -43%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57334 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54060 Points
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)	53700 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (39164 - 61370, n=20)	52842 Points -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52544 Points -3%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52105 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	25547 Points -53%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	15575 Points -71%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	183146 MB/s +35%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	179186 MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	139407 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	135833 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (54613 - 142360, n=20)	115891 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)	109216 MB/s -20%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102111 MB/s -25%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41612 MB/s -69%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1393 MB/s +65%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1389 MB/s +64%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)	1367 MB/s +62%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1143 MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	890 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	845 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (578 - 911, n=20)	803 MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	585 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)	11803 KRay/s +38%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	11612 KRay/s +36%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	10864 KRay/s +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9001 KRay/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	8529 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5798 - 9540, n=20)	8175 KRay/s -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5322 KRay/s -38%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3181 KRay/s -63%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	47710 MPixel/s +58%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41007 MPixel/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)	40243 MPixel/s +33%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	37573 MPixel/s +24%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36231 MPixel/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	30226 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	29705 MPixel/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26873 - 30604, n=20)	29389 MPixel/s -3%

系统性能

在系统性能基准测试中，Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22的结果与纯CPU基准测试的结果相似。性能水平仍然不错，与华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo相比，高出约10%。主观上，XMG Neo 17感觉非常快，在日常使用中几乎没有任何加载时间。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8203 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7803 Points +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7539 Points +8%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7139 Points +2%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6993 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6966 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6351 - 6966, n=2)	6659 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	6351 Points -9%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11093 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10833 Points +11%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10715 Points +10%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10254 Points +5%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9761 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9740 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9374 - 9740, n=2)	9557 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9374 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10178 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9904 Points +4%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9682 Points +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9613 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9564 Points
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9102 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (7704 - 9564, n=2)	8634 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7704 Points -19%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13270 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12134 Points +23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11293 Points +15%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10578 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9848 Points
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9822 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9626 - 9848, n=2)	9737 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9626 Points -2%

CrossMark / Overall
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2169 Points +28%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2108 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=145, last 2 years)	1910 Points +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1861 Points +10%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1792 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1711 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1699 - 1711, n=2)	1705 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1699 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2047 Points +24%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1978 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=145, last 2 years)	1809 Points +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1786 Points +9%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1745 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1698 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1646 - 1698, n=2)	1672 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1646 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2328 Points +25%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2288 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=145, last 2 years)	2097 Points +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1936 Points +4%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1893 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1867 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1724 - 1867, n=2)	1796 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1724 Points -8%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2090 Points +49%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1991 Points +42%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1868 Points +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1715 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=145, last 2 years)	1709 Points +22%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1643 Points +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1405 - 1715, n=2)	1560 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1405 Points

PCMark 10 Score		6966 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	70863 MB/s +41%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)	65434 MB/s +30%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64030 MB/s +27%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60342 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60030 MB/s +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	53162 MB/s +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (47938 - 53345, n=20)	50405 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	50231 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	72930 MB/s +42%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)	69366 MB/s +35%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	67695 MB/s +32%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62684 MB/s +22%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62140 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	53321 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51403 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (43892 - 53321, n=20)	51062 MB/s -1%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	67353 MB/s +22%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)	67198 MB/s +22%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60014 MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	58004 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57180 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55263 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (51085 - 57202, n=20)	55188 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51577 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	120.6 ns * -33%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)	93.7 ns * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	92.3 ns * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	90.8 ns *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	88.8 ns * +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (80.7 - 120.6, n=20)	88.7 ns * +2%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	83.9 ns * +8%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示在Edge中打开多个浏览器标签后延迟增加。在播放4K YouTube视频和初始化Prime95之后，延迟略有增加。未来的驱动程序或BIOS优化可能会改善这个问题。播放我们的4K测试视频使用了大约10%的AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX的iGPU。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4362 μs *
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2203.2 μs * +49%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	638.25 μs * +85%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2127.9 μs * +51%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1684.6 μs * +61%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	521.5 μs * +88%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	388.5 μs * +91%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

我们的测试样本配备的是三星980 Pro。然而，用户可以为XMG Neo 17选择希捷、Crucial和Corsair的型号。在订购时，用户将不得不在各种型号之间做出决定。虽然我们测试设备的固态硬盘为1TB，足够大，但我们建议不要选择较小的容量，以防止存储空间不断耗尽。在负载情况下，连续读取和写入性能非常好，使Schenker XMG Neo 17在这一类别中获得了良好的整体结果。

XMG Neo 17最多可以配备两个M.2固态硬盘。

更多的比较和基准可以在我们的比较表.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

Sequential Read: 3973 MB/s

Sequential Write: 4099 MB/s

512K Read: 3013 MB/s

512K Write: 3765 MB/s

4K Read: 76.06 MB/s

4K Write: 190.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 572 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 418 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	78.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	76.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	76.7 pt
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	72.6 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.9 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX ^-1! Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	67.6 pt
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	65.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	58.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	4903 MB/s +27%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4265 (4201.21^min - 4264.91^max) MB/s +10%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (2659 - 4315, n=26)	3877 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3872 (3855.82^min - 3871.97^max) MB/s
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3713 (3643.38^min - 3713.01^max) MB/s -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3595 (3264.19^min - 3594.73^max) MB/s -7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3561 (3468.06^min - 3560.96^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)	3475 MB/s -10%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7889 (6495.73^min - 7888.81^max) MB/s +86%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4599 (4248.83^min - 4598.67^max) MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4242 (4225.7^min - 4241.7^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4173 (4063.65^min - 4172.96^max) MB/s -2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3966 (3885.39^min - 3966.13^max) MB/s -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (2839 - 4493, n=26)	3893 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)	3812 MB/s -10%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3706 (3661.84^min - 3706.09^max) MB/s -13%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	10557 (9742.97^min - 10557.3^max) MB/s +65%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6722 (987.46^min - 6721.79^max) MB/s +5%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6695 (6233.69^min - 6694.56^max) MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6661 (6277.2^min - 6660.66^max) MB/s +4%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (3227 - 6902, n=26)	6544 MB/s +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6499 (5666.71^min - 6499.29^max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6384 (5573.36^min - 6384.17^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)	6323 MB/s -1%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	9830 (9799.27^min - 9829.82^max) MB/s +95%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5043 (5032.12^min - 5043.21^max) MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5037 (5025^min - 5036.73^max) MB/s 0%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4959 (4940^min - 4958.51^max) MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4939 (4932.28^min - 4939.42^max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (3184 - 5087, n=26)	4879 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)	4851 MB/s -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4765 (4460.74^min - 4765.06^max) MB/s -6%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	83 (80.56^min - 82.99^max) MB/s +5%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	83 (80.23^min - 83.02^max) MB/s +5%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (61.1 - 94.3, n=26)	79.9 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	79.1 (78.08^min - 79.08^max) MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	77 (74.91^min - 76.95^max) MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	73.1 (72.79^min - 73.06^max) MB/s -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	70.3 (69.8^min - 70.31^max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)	66 MB/s -17%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	359 (324.09^min - 358.58^max) MB/s +84%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	286 (284.91^min - 285.72^max) MB/s +47%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	241 MB/s +24%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	222 (217.59^min - 222.42^max) MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	222 (221.38^min - 221.87^max) MB/s +14%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (132.2 - 311, n=26)	217 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	195.1 (194.02^min - 195.09^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4483 (4465.42^min - 4482.78^max) MB/s
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4075 (4059.83^min - 4075.02^max) MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3934 (3812.88^min - 3933.78^max) MB/s -12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3797 (3780.09^min - 3796.62^max) MB/s -15%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (895 - 4483, n=26)	3197 MB/s -29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2750 (2675.05^min - 2750.14^max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)	2571 MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2390 (2226.95^min - 2390.15^max) MB/s -47%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4383 (4358.15^min - 4383.06^max) MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3504 (3465.89^min - 3503.69^max) MB/s -20%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3503 (3468.77^min - 3503.3^max) MB/s -20%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3129 (3011.94^min - 3128.85^max) MB/s -29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2786 (2543.84^min - 2785.68^max) MB/s -36%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (345 - 4383, n=26)	2341 MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)	2137 MB/s -51%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1542 (1501.74^min - 1541.63^max) MB/s -65%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9218 Points
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8951 Points -3%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8492 Points -8%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7807 Points -15%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (3394 - 9322, n=24)	7334 Points -20%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7009 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)	6746 Points -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	6635 Points -28%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3428 Points
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3399 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3327 Points -3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2951 Points -14%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (1501 - 3512, n=24)	2811 Points -18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2709 Points -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2619 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)	2446 Points -29%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4113 Points
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3882 Points -6%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 Points -14%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3397 Points -17%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (1130 - 4194, n=24)	3159 Points -23%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)	3112 Points -24%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2930 Points -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2556 Points -38%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	5344.88 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5157 MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5061.06 MB/s -2%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5053.82 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)	4945 MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4923.15 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (545 - 5692, n=24)	4838 MB/s -6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4531.51 MB/s -12%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	7663.27 MB/s +105%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4186.78 MB/s +12%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3797.23 MB/s +2%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3764.99 MB/s +1%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)	3760 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3733 MB/s
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3628.78 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (1613 - 4136, n=24)	3490 MB/s -7%
4K Read
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	82.47 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	77.59 MB/s +13%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (53.5 - 86.8, n=24)	72 MB/s +4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	69.89 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	68.93 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	68.93 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)	65.2 MB/s -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	64.38 MB/s -7%
4K Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	328.69 MB/s +109%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	247.61 MB/s +58%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)	213 MB/s +36%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	212.27 MB/s +35%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211.73 MB/s +35%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	194.44 MB/s +24%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (134.6 - 254, n=24)	188.8 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	157.01 MB/s
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2842.96 MB/s
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2811.14 MB/s -1%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2751.05 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2381.4 MB/s -16%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (915 - 2938, n=24)	2234 MB/s -21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2191.95 MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	2015.68 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)	1881 MB/s -34%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3582.58 MB/s
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3271.86 MB/s -9%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2942.87 MB/s -18%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2822.91 MB/s -21%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (557 - 3708, n=24)	2622 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)	2527 MB/s -29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2298.82 MB/s -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	1460.96 MB/s -59%
Access Time Read
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)	0.05576 ms * -64%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	0.053 ms * -56%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.049 ms * -44%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.042 ms * -24%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (0.022 - 0.073, n=24)	0.04075 ms * -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.034 ms *
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.03 ms * +12%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)	0.04728 ms * -89%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW (0.018 - 0.089, n=24)	0.03363 ms * -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.025 ms *
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.022 ms * +12%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.021 ms * +16%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.02 ms * +20%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.017 ms * +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)	0.013 ms * +48%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6279 (4891.05-6318.25)

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø4885 (3287-6413.09)

Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6586 (6083.62-6649.44)

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø6407 (5705.51-6545.21)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0): Ø8257 (5868.26-10519.1)

MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø6686 (6257.06-6713.19)

GPU性能

随着GeForce RTX 3080 Ti笔记本GPU，Nvidia最快的安培偏向作为显卡。有了16GB的VRAM，用户就不用担心了，GPU可以获得175瓦的最大功率预算。我们的模型表现得非常好，排在第二位的是微星泰坦GT77.此外，4%的赤字小得可怜，尽管设备的CPU配置不同，但它们的表现非常相似。

更多的比较和基准测试可以在我们的 G PU比较表.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	100 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	95.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	90.7 pt
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	87.1 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	84.9 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	84.8 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	80.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	73.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	44906 Points +2%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	44393 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	43823 Points
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points 0%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	43383 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	40257 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13920 - 45841, n=45)	39402 Points -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	37288 Points -15%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	186284 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (73574 - 192520, n=26)	145836 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	144426 Points
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	143583 Points
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	116343 Points
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	114594 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	79498 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	34439 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	33120 Points
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	31732 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points -5%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	31033 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6928 - 34439, n=43)	29496 Points -11%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	28006 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27562 Points -17%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	13554 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13118 Points +3%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	12865 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	12684 Points
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	12405 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (4921 - 13835, n=43)	11850 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	11227 Points -11%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	11076 Points -13%

3DMark 11 Performance		33102 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		27946 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		15762 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		12300 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

Schenker XMG Neo 17提供了一个杰出的游戏性能。简而言之，目前所有的游戏都能在原始分辨率和最大细节设置下顺利运行。帧率始终很高，由于有大的VRAM，用户在相当长的一段时间内不必担心升级问题。

The Witcher 3 | F1 2021 | Far Cry 5 | GTA V

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	260 (213^min, 216.3^P1) fps +10%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	249 (39.7^min, 69.3^P0.1, 165.5^P1) fps +6%
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years)	242 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	236 (30.3^min, 70.5^P0.1, 139.4^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (144 - 268, n=28)	220 fps -7%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	218 (15.9^min, 46^P0.1, 122.8^P1) fps -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	197.9 (47.7^min, 61.4^P0.1, 127.7^P1) fps -16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	186.6 (141^min) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	129.3 (110^min, 111.14^P1) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +6%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126.7 (29.1^min, 45.6^P0.1, 97.9^P1) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121 (98^min) fps
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	119.6 (28.2^min, 31^P0.1, 74.4^P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 130.6, n=43)	112.1 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.1 (30^min, 41.5^P0.1, 74.7^P1) fps -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102.1 (82^min) fps -16%

F1 2021
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	302 (224^min, 161^P1) fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	269 (210^min, 145^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 470, n=16, last 2 years)	263 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (182.1 - 316, n=17)	247 fps -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	246 (211^min, 167^P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	225 (189^min, 124^P1) fps -16%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	219 (176^min, 123^P1) fps -19%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	207 (180^min, 131^P1) fps -23%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	158.2 (133^min, 130^P1) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	148.5 (123^min, 117^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (27.6 - 271, n=16, last 2 years)	145.2 fps -2%
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	133.8 (114^min, 91^P1) fps -10%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	132.8 (115^min, 98^P1) fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	130.2 (109^min, 92^P1) fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.2 - 160.6, n=30)	126.1 fps -15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.9 (100^min, 78^P1) fps -18%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	167 (135^min) fps +42%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	164 (130^min) fps +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (118 - 167, n=22)	141.7 fps +20%
Average of class Gaming (35 - 232, n=98, last 2 years)	140 fps +19%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	122 (86^min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	120 (73^min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	118 (88^min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	156 (122^min) fps +38%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	153 (116^min) fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (111 - 162, n=24)	133 fps +18%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years)	131 fps +16%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	116 (89^min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (81^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111 (82^min) fps -2%

GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	184.3 (1.907^min, 142.9^P1) fps +13%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	182.7 (8.3^min, 142.9^P1) fps +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	176.1 (2.91^min, 111.1^P1) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (153.4 - 184.3, n=28)	175.1 fps +7%
Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 187.1, n=145, last 2 years)	169.6 fps +4%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	166 (4.33^min, 111.1^P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	163.8 (4.96^min, 100^P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	158.9 (4.88^min, 111.1^P1) fps -3%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	136 (4.34^min, 90.9^P1) fps +34%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	131.8 (6.21^min, 90.9^P1) fps +29%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=170, last 2 years)	113.7 fps +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (10.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 139.2, n=42)	111 fps +9%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	106 (25.5^min, 76.9^P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.8 (18.4^min, 71.4^P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.5 (21.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps 0%

在我们的压力测试中，包括在Ultra预设下运行TheWitcher 3，该系统显示了稳定的性能。在测试期间或长时间游戏后，我们没有观察到帧率下降到无法播放的水平。

Witcher 3 FPS Graph

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø119.7 (105-125)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	181.2	176.1	163.8	101.8	101.1	121
The Witcher 3 (2015)	386	335	236	121		90.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	146.5	133.9	129.3	121.4		122.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	190.8	161.5	122.8		96.4	57.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	113.7	102	80.3			86.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	142	125	118	113	110	70
Strange Brigade (2018)	205	277	229	201	154.4	95
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	175.2	152.9	152.6	156.5	123.9	72.4
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	125	112	108	96	93	73
Metro Exodus (2019)	172.4	134.4	108.6	88.1	73.2	47.6
Borderlands 3 (2019)	123.6	106.4	99.8	90.7	78.2	46.1
F1 2020 (2020)	304	271	255	197.9	153.6	88.1
F1 2021 (2021)	354	314	269	148.5	114.2	65.3
New World (2021)	126.4	106.5	97	94.5	85.9	50.3
Far Cry 6 (2021)	118.6	104	95	99.4	86.6	54.2
God of War (2022)	129.9	127.9	111.1	78.9	64.7	46.5
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	222	185.4	137.1	110.5	79.3	43.9
F1 22 (2022)	193	184	172	91	62	32

排放 - 负载下相对较响

系统噪音

在负载情况下，冷却解决方案有它自己的工作，导致最大的噪音水平高达54分贝（A）。由于其他设备在我们的比较中没有明显的噪音，Schenker XMG Neo 17的数值并不出奇。该系统可以连接到XMG Oasis，以获得更安静的噪音水平。然而，我们现在还无法证实这一点。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 29 / 40 dB(A)
Load		47 / 54 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise		10%	4%	0%	9%	-7%
off / environment *	26	21.9 16%	26 -0%	26 -0%	26 -0%	26 -0%
Idle Minimum *	26	24.53 6%	26 -0%	26 -0%	26 -0%	26 -0%
Idle Average *	29	24.53 15%	27 7%	29 -0%	27 7%	34 -17%
Idle Maximum *	40	24.53 39%	32 20%	34 15%	29 27%	46 -15%
Load Average *	47	46.25 2%	50 -6%	50 -6%	41 13%	50 -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	52	56.86 -9%	51 2%	53 -2%	48 8%	55 -6%
Load Maximum *	54	54.25 -0%	51 6%	56 -4%	50 7%	57 -6%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在高达52°C（125.6°F）的情况下，机箱的底部变得明显温暖。然而，在我们的比较中，其他设备也达到了类似的温度。由于我们在游戏时也测得了类似的温度，我们建议不要在腿上使用该系统。怠速时没有问题。然后，峰值温度分别下降到30℃（86℉）和33℃（91.4℉）。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


49 °C	48 °C	45 °C
47 °C	47 °C	42 °C
38 °C	31 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 42.1 °C


47 °C	52 °C	46 °C
37 °C	49 °C	40 °C
34 °C	37 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 42 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


30 °C	30 °C	30 °C
30 °C	30 °C	30 °C
29 °C	29 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 29.7 °C


33 °C	33 °C	33 °C
31 °C	31 °C	31 °C
30 °C	31 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 31.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


48 °C	47 °C	46 °C
47 °C	47 °C	41 °C
39 °C	31 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 41.9 °C


46 °C	51 °C	48 °C
38 °C	48 °C	40 °C
33 °C	38 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 42.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		-4%	-11%	3%	1%	-19%
Maximum Upper Side *	49	40.8 17%	50 -2%	47 4%	45 8%	53 -8%
Maximum Bottom *	52	52.4 -1%	56 -8%	49 6%	50 4%	58 -12%
Idle Upper Side *	30	34.6 -15%	36 -20%	31 -3%	33 -10%	38 -27%
Idle Bottom *	33	38.4 -16%	38 -15%	32 3%	33 -0%	43 -30%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

Schenker对CPU和GPU的热量管理得相当好，尽管Ryzen 9 6900HX的峰值温度接近95℃（203°F），非常接近100℃（212°F）大关。尽管如此，该SoC的性能是一致的，没有任何重大的下滑。SoC达到了80瓦的峰值功耗，然后随着时间的推移下降并稳定在40瓦。GPU的温度看起来明显更好。尽管达到了高达170瓦的峰值消耗，但在我们的压力测试中，我们记录的最高温度只有77℃（170.6°F）。

发言人

掌托下方有两个下射式扬声器。不幸的是，它们在低音方面有所欠缺，而中音和高音则是声音中明显占主导地位的部分。对于游戏，用户可能会选择一个耳机。适当的型号可以通过3.5毫米耳机插孔或USB连接到笔记本电脑上。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--良好的消耗值

能源消耗

在能源消耗方面，Schenker XMG Neo 17有一些惊喜，因为它在空闲和低负荷时非常高效。没有其他设备能够在这方面与我们的Schenker相提并论。在最大负荷下，该系统需要从AC适配器中获得高达306瓦的能量，由于电源砖的额定功率为330瓦，所以这不是一个问题。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / Watt
Idle	7 / 11 / 17 Watt
Load	92 / 306 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-114%	-61%	-18%	-59%	-52%	-72%	-44%
Idle Minimum *	7	30.21 -332%	17 -143%	7 -0%	19 -171%	13 -86%	17.2 ?(7 - 33.2, n=28) -146%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=155, last 2 years) -94%
Idle Average *	11	32.42 -195%	23 -109%	19 -73%	24 -118%	19 -73%	23.3 ?(11 - 38, n=28) -112%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=155, last 2 years) -73%
Idle Maximum *	17	33.7 -98%	34 -100%	28 -65%	31 -82%	29 -71%	30.8 ?(17 - 60.8, n=28) -81%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=155, last 2 years) -58%
Load Average *	92	125.09 -36%	120 -30%	114 -24%	104 -13%	143 -55%	121.2 ?(92 - 150, n=28) -32%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) -16%
Witcher 3 ultra *	221	256 -16%	229 -4%	159 28%	186.5 16%	247 -12%
Load Maximum *	306	321.88 -5%	243 21%	227 26%	256 16%	352 -15%	276 ?(179 - 401, n=28) 10%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) 19%

* ... smaller is better

Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø221 (201-226)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø237 (147.8-260)

Consumption external Monitor

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø104.9 (90.7-113.4)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø107.5 (105.8-112.6)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø210 (204-215)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø222 (204-233)

电池寿命

Schenker为XMG Neo 17配备了99瓦时的大电池，在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，它能够为我们的测试样本提供近9个小时的电力。特别是与它的竞争对手相比，这是一个很好的结果。视频播放的运行时间略低，该设备仅在6.5小时后就需要充电。给大电池完全充电的速度令人惊讶，仅需102分钟。

应该注意的是，在电池模式下，CPU和GPU的性能是有限的。然而，这种行为并不是Schenker XMG Neo 17所特有的，几乎在目前所有的游戏笔记本上都存在。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		12h 02min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 104.0.1293.63)		8h 57min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (EDGE: 104.0.1293.63)		3h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 38min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 49min

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.98 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-13%	-33%	3%	-3%	-12%	-18%
Reader / Idle	722		428 -41%		749 4%	590 -18%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) -22%
H.264	398	433 9%	290 -27%	490 23%	559 40%	389 -2%	409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) 3%
WiFi v1.3	537	412.1 -23%	229 -57%	344 -36%	469 -13%	324 -40%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) -30%
Load	109	82 -25%	103 -6%	133 22%	62 -43%	122 12%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) -21%
Witcher 3 ultra		90					78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 坚固的金属底盘

+ 色彩准确的16:10显示屏，240赫兹

+ 非常大的触摸板

+ 带Cherry MX开关的机械按键

+ 2,5-Gb/s以太网

+ CPU和GPU在负载下表现稳定

+ 良好的电池寿命

+ 可接受的能源消耗值

+ 提供大量的配置选项

+ XMG Oasis准备就绪（液体冷却）

Cons

- 有问题的DPC延迟

- 没有4K选项

结论 - 带有可选水冷的快速游戏笔记本

坚固而光滑的外壳，在日常使用中几乎没有任何性能，以及Nvidia最快的笔记本电脑GPU，再加上液体冷却设备的可能性，使Schenker XMG Neo 17成为一个引人注目的纸上报价。制造商几乎没有任何妥协，并允许硬件释放其全部潜力，这在很大程度上导致了出色的基准测试结果。

我们的Neo 17中的AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX表现良好，并能在长时间内保持其性能。NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti也是如此。这些是我们在没有选配XMG Oasis的情况下的观察结果，因为集成冷却解决方案已经促进了稳定的性能。对于喜欢更安静的系统的用户，可选的水冷器可能值得考虑。我们很高兴看到具有16:10外形尺寸的显示器。它唯一的缺点是AdobeRGB和P3色彩空间覆盖面有点窄，对于专业的照片和视频编辑来说，这还不够好。也就是说，如果你把XMG Neo 17作为游戏笔记本使用，这就不是一个问题。

Schenker XMG Neo 17是一款快速的游戏笔记本，不必人为地控制其性能。得益于可选的XMG Oasis配件，该笔记本甚至支持液体冷却。

总的来说，Schenker XMG Neo 17是一款坚实的游戏笔记本，在性能方面提供了很多。我们也没有发现什么大的缺点。Neo 17在电池寿命方面也做得很好。如果我们要批评什么，那就是键盘，它配备的小键盘不幸没有使用Cherry MX开关。此外，倾斜的交流电适配器插头是不理想的，因为一个直的插头不会不必要地阻碍附近的端口。在Wi-Fi性能方面，还有改进的余地。至少，用户可以在配置过程中选择一个更现代/更快速的Wi-Fi模块。说到这里--后者具有申克公司的特点，而且组织良好。该设备可以根据自己的喜好进行定制，而且选择范围很广。除了基本单元外，CPU和显示器都是固定的，不能改变。

Schenker XMG Neo 17有很多竞争对手。如前所述，一些由英特尔Alder Lake驱动的笔记本电脑可以提供更快的性能。微星Titan GT77 12UHS就是这样一个例子，尽管它（甚至）比我们配置的Neo 17更贵，价格约为4200美元。

价格和可用性

Schenker XMG Neo 17可直接从制造商的网上商店购买。有许多不同的配置选项。基本型号的价格约为2950美元，而我们的配置售价约为4200美元。

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

83 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

89%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

60 / 80 → 75%

Weight

58 / 10-66 → 86%

Battery

76 / 95 → 80%

Display

92%

Games Performance

99%

Application Performance

97%

Temperature

80 / 95 → 85%

Noise

66 / 90 → 74%

Audio

78%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Average

78%

88%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 申克XMG Neo 17 M22的回顾。配备Cherry MX机械按键的高性能游戏笔记本

Sebastian Bade, 2022-09- 1 (Update: 2022-09- 1)

潜在的竞争对手比较

底盘 - 非常罗布斯基地

尺寸比较

连接性 - 遗憾的是没有Thunderbolt 4

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

辅料

维护

担保

输入设备 - Cherry MX开关 - 但并非适用于所有的按键？

键盘

触摸板

显示屏 - 240赫兹和16:10外形尺寸

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能--AMD和Nvidia联合

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

系统性能

DPC延时

存储解决方案

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU性能

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS Graph

排放 - 负载下相对较响

系统噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 audio analysis

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX audio analysis

能源管理--良好的消耗值

能源消耗

Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Consumption external Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 带有可选水冷的快速游戏笔记本

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison