宏碁Nitro 16 AN16-41评论:一个具有良好电池寿命的RTX 4070游戏笔记本
宏碁Nitro 16--一款中端游戏笔记本电脑--基于AMD和Nvidia的组合:该机器由Rembrandt和Ada Lovelace驱动。宏碁的要价约为2000美元的全套设备。竞争的设备有联想Legion Pro 5 16ARX8,以及Medion Erazer Major X20,以及Aorus 15X ASF, 华硕华硕TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S | 2.2 kg | 22.1 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 29 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子 - Nitro是黑色底盘的家。
Nitro 16的机箱并不由铝或镁等高级机箱材料组成。整个机箱由黑色塑料组成,宏碁选择了哑光的光滑表面。除了RGB键盘照明外,还在机箱背面以几条薄薄的彩色条纹的形式提供了一些彩色的照明。宏碁已经决定不在电脑上印上一些外向的设计元素。
这台笔记本电脑似乎没有任何制造上的缺陷。缝隙尺寸很好,没有明显的材料突起。底座可以略微扭动,而盖子则可以大幅度扭动。对机盖后部施加压力并不会导致显示图像失真。铰链将盖子牢牢固定住,最大打开角度约为165度。单手打开盖子是可能的。
宏碁的电脑是同行中最重和最庞大的。竞争对手的天平比我们的评测模型少几百克。
特点 - 宏碁电脑配备了USB4
AN16有三个USB-A端口(1个USB 2.0,2个USB 3.2 Gen 2)和两个USB-C端口(1个USB 3.2 Gen 2,1个USB 4)供其使用。后者支持Power Delivery,可以显示DisplayPort信号。Nitro总共有三个视频输出(HDMI 2.1,2个DP)。这些产品由一个音频插孔和一个千兆以太网端口来完成。
视频输出和电源接口可以在设备的后部找到,这意味着任何相应的电缆都会跑到笔记本电脑的后面,不会碍事。
SD卡阅读器
速度方面,SD存储卡读卡器(参考卡:AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)位于中间位置,最大传输速度为80.3 MB/s(传输250个jpg图像文件,每个约5 MB)和87.5 MB/s(复制大数据块)。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
在最佳条件下(附近没有Wi-Fi设备,笔记本电脑和服务器PC之间的距离较短),可以实现出色的Wi-Fi数据传输率。宏碁笔记本电脑使用Wi-Fi 6E芯片(MediaTek MT7922)。有线连接由Killer/Intel芯片(E2600;1GBit/s)处理。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头(0.9MP,最大1280 x 720像素)没有机械镜头盖。就质量而言,该摄像头不能提供令人信服的结果,而且在色彩准确性方面也有缺陷:颜色与它们应该有的样子有很大偏差。
辅料
除了通常的文件(快速启动指南和保修信息)外,没有包括其他附件。
服务
在卸下机箱底部的螺丝后,可以用平铲子或拨浪鼓帮助卸下底座单元。 要小心:基本单元被牢固地固定在那里。随后,可以访问内存库(两个都占用)以及固态硬盘(PCIe 4)、第二个M.2-2280插槽(PCIe 4)、BIOS电池、Wi-Fi模块、风扇、扬声器和电池。
担保
宏碁为这款16英寸的设备提供了两年的保证。这可以延长到三年,但需要支付近100美元的额外费用。
输入设备 - 宏碁Nitro配备了RGB背光灯
键盘
宏碁为AN16配备了Chiclet键盘,其中包括数字键盘以及RGB照明,由凹形键(字母、数字行)和扁平键(功能键、数字键盘)组成。WASD和方向键在视觉上得到了强调。这也适用于单独的NitroSense键,它可以打开笔记本电脑的类似名称的控制中心。
所有的按键都有较短的行程和明确的压力点。然而,它们的阻力可以更清晰一点。打字时,键盘会有轻微的弯曲,但不会让人感到特别讨厌。总而言之,宏碁已经提供了一个适合日常使用的键盘。
触摸板
多点触摸点击板可作为鼠标的替代品(约12.6 x 7.7厘米),其光滑的表面确保了愉快的输入体验。它拥有较短的行程和清晰的压力点。
显示器 - 宏碁为AN16配备了明亮的面板
哑光的16英寸(2560 x 1600像素,IPS)、16:10长宽比的显示屏因支持G-Sync、没有PWM闪烁和快速响应时间而表现出色。
165赫兹面板的亮度和对比度满足了他们的期望(分别为>300 cd/m²和1.000:1)。特别是,该显示器的亮度值得强调(520 cd/m²)。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 520 cd/m²
Contrast: 1333:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.74
ΔE Greyscale 2.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Medion Erazer Major X20 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Aorus 15X ASF BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 3% | 1% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.9 | 69.3 2% | 70.4 4% | 69.4 2% | 69.3 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.1 | 97.3 -2% | 99.6 1% | 98 -1% | 98.2 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.9 | 70.7 1% | 72.6 4% | 70.9 1% | 70.5 1% |
Response Times | -71% | -23% | -33% | -51% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 11 ? | 15.6 ? -42% | 7 ? 36% | 13.1 ? -19% | 12.4 ? -13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5 ? | 10 ? -100% | 9.1 ? -82% | 7.3 ? -46% | 9.4 ? -88% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -3% | 16% | -16% | 0% | |
Brightness middle | 520 | 301 -42% | 355.3 -32% | 374 -28% | 316 -39% |
Brightness | 494 | 294 -40% | 340 -31% | 357 -28% | 301 -39% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 94 3% | 91 0% | 92 1% | 90 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.21 46% | 0.32 18% | 0.33 15% | 0.28 28% |
Contrast | 1333 | 1433 8% | 1110 -17% | 1133 -15% | 1129 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.94 | 1.79 8% | 1.13 42% | 2.43 -25% | 1.54 21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.62 | 3.48 38% | 2.78 51% | 3.97 29% | 2.46 56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.74 | 1.2 -62% | 0.32 57% | 1.4 -89% | 1.21 -64% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.94 | 2.5 15% | 1.4 52% | 3.1 -5% | 1.3 56% |
Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.265 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.191 100% | 2.307 95% |
CCT | 6443 101% | 6157 106% | 6372 102% | 6194 105% | 6456 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-12% | -1% /
7% | -16% /
-15% | -17% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱后,该显示器拥有良好的色彩再现能力:偏差约为1.9,该面板(DeltaE<3)符合其要求。校准将偏差降低到0.74,并确保平衡灰度。该面板完全覆盖了sRGB色彩空间,但相比之下,没有覆盖AdobeRGB和DCI P3色彩空间。然而,这与竞争对手提供的屏幕没有区别。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
IPS面板具有稳定的可视角度,从任何位置都能看清。由于其非常高的亮度,该显示屏甚至可以在户外阅读。
性能--AMD和Nvidia为这款游戏笔记本提供动力
宏碁有多个变种的Nitro 16--中档游戏笔记本电脑--在提供。Ada Lovelace GPU与英特尔或AMD CPU相结合。我们的评测模型配备了AMD,可以以大约2000美元的价格买到。目前,该系列的设备起价约为1450美元。这让你得到一台由Ryzen 5 7535HS、RTX 4050、16GB内存、1TB SSD和WUXGA显示器组成的电脑。
测试条件
笔记本电脑提供了六个制造商特定的性能模式--四个主模式,两个电池模式(见表)。我们使用了 "性能"(基准)和 "经济"(电池模式)模式。"Turbo "和 "Performance "只在主电源运行时可用(电池电量>30 %)。
键盘上方的一个按钮可以在各种模式之间快速切换。另外,也可以通过笔记本的NitroSense软件(笔记本的控制中心)来完成。一个LED灯显示哪种模式处于活动状态。
Turbo | Leistung | Ausgeglichen | Leise | Ausgeglichen (Akku) | Eco (Akku) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 95 瓦 | 75 瓦 | 65 瓦 | 45 瓦 | 25 瓦 | 25 瓦 |
功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 100 瓦 | 100 瓦 | 100 瓦 | 100 瓦 | 25 瓦 | 25 瓦 |
处理器
的CPU部分Ryzen 7 7735HSAPU(Rembrandt R,Zen 3+)提供8个处理器核心,有16个线程。3.2 GHz的基本时钟速度可以提高到4.75 GHz(一个核心)。基准测试结果比迄今为止看到的7735HS的平均水平要高一点。四种性能模式(主)之间的差异相对较小。
该 华硕TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS和联想Legion Pro 5 16ARX8的AMD处理器无法与我们的评测模型相比。为什么?由于改进的架构(Zen 4)和更高的时钟速度,这两款八核CPU的功率明显增加--电源要求略低。
CB15循环测试表明,CPU以一贯的高水平涡轮增压时钟速度确认连续的多线程负载--与所选的性能模式无关。涡轮 "配置文件确保了最低限度的更高数值。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (12718 - 17161, n=13) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (81722 - 105483, n=13) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (2818 - 3494, n=13) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (90101 - 108729, n=13) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (11441 - 13097, n=13) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (44756 - 58232, n=13) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (49927 - 137629, n=13) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (651 - 906, n=13) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1459 - 9094, n=13) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (19153 - 30542, n=13) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
系统性能
良好的PCMark结果证实,运行平稳的系统为要求苛刻的应用提供了足够的动力,如渲染、视频编辑和游戏。RAM的传输率大大低于可能的传输率,如图所示Aorus 15X ASF和 Medion Erazer Major X20的比较值。这三台电脑都有DDR5-4800板载内存。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7220 - 7240, n=2) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Aorus 15X ASF |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10579 - 10690, n=2) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8893 - 9146, n=2) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10558 - 10834, n=2) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Aorus 15X ASF |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5174 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5520 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7220 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (30324 - 52012, n=13) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (33938 - 51856, n=13) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (33175 - 55284, n=13) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (78.2 - 109.7, n=13) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Aorus 15X ASF |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
标准化的延迟监测测试(互联网冲浪、4k视频播放、Prime95高负荷)很有启示意义。该系统似乎并不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会改善或恶化问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
宏碁为Nitro配备了三星的1TB固态硬盘(PCIe 4,M.2 2280),提供非常好的传输速率。有一个缺点:由于热节流,性能下降可能很快发生。笔记本电脑有空间可以安装第二块PCIe 4固态硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous performance read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在我们的评测模型中,宏碁为其Ryzen 7 APU搭配了一个 GeForce RTX 4070笔记本电脑GPU,并赋予它140瓦的最大TGP--更多是不可能的。根据Witcher 3 测试,TGP并没有被完全利用。该GPU提供4,608个着色器,128位总线宽度和快速GDDR6内存(8,192 MB)。
3DMark的结果高于RTX 4070的平均值。四种主电源和两种电池性能模式之间的性能差异非常小。dGPU模式确实有助于解决问题。在dGPU和Optimus之间切换不需要重新启动--支持高级Optimus。
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 47449 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 30422 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 60531 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25676 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11530 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Nitro是为WQXGA游戏而设计的,设置为最高级别。在连接相应的显示器后,更高的分辨率是可能的--在略微降低的设置下。
对于这款GPU来说,帧率通常刚刚超过平均水平。然而,一些要求不高的游戏或设置提供了相当低的数字 - 例如,GTA V和Dota 2 Reborn。这可以追溯到RTX 4070的 "Max Q "功能集:高性能不是主要目标--GPU应该尽可能有效地工作。这不仅包括能源需求,还包括温度水平和/或噪音水平。GTA V Ultra基准运行时,TGP的平均功率几乎为60瓦(50至75瓦)。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=56) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.3 - 140.5, n=57) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
Dead Island 2 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (130.2 - 178.5, n=3) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 181.7, n=11, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:High T | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (95.6 - 116.7, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (61.8 - 178.5, n=5, last 2 years) |
The Callisto Protocol | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) | |
Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 150.7, n=21, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (78.9 - 88, n=4) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) | |
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 126.7, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (58.4 - 68.3, n=4) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) + Full Ray-Tracing | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (50.8 - 70, n=4) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming (32 - 79.6, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
为了检查帧率是否在较长时间内保持稳定,我们在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行了 "TheWitcher 3" 游戏约60分钟。游戏人物没有被移动,也没有观察到帧率的下降。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 180.6 | 158.9 | 97.4 | 86.1 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 322.5 | 213.3 | 113.2 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 137.7 | 131.9 | 118.9 | 114.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 186.2 | 147.7 | 109.1 | 81.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 107 | 94.2 | 76.3 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 141 | 120 | 116 | 109 | 102 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 375 | 273 | 221 | 192.6 | 129 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 86.03 | 53.49 | |||
F1 22 (2022) | 225 | 222 | 205 | 79.3 | 50.3 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 105 | 74 | |||
The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 122.8 | 113.8 | 111.8 | 83.5 | 66.7 |
Atomic Heart (2023) | 176.6 | 147.4 | 95.1 | 78 | 58.6 |
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) | 119.3 | 117.6 | 111.5 | 80.5 | 58.5 |
The Last of Us (2023) | 98.6 | 85.9 | 77.7 | 69.5 | 41.7 |
Dead Island 2 (2023) | 167.9 | 161.7 | 151.9 | 143.4 | 106.6 |
排放 - 宏碁笔记本电脑可以安静地运行
噪声排放
一般来说,在日常使用中(办公室、互联网等),电脑的运行是安静的,有时是无声的。使用 "性能 "和 "涡轮 "模式,在全负荷情况下,有可能达到62分贝(A)的最大噪音水平。"平衡 "模式的最高值为43.4 dB(A),但也很适中,因此代表了噪音和性能之间的一个很好的妥协。静音 "模式负责实现最大的静音。
这些模式之间的性能差异相对不大。因此,"平衡 "和 "安静 "确保了在中等至低噪音水平下的游戏。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.7 / 25.7 / 26.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.9 / 62 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A) |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R | Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Aorus 15 XE5 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 8% | -10% | -16% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 25.7 | 25 3% | 23.2 10% | 24 7% | 25 3% | 24 7% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.7 | 25 3% | 23.2 10% | 25 3% | 28 -9% | 26 -1% |
Idle Average * | 25.7 | 26 -1% | 23.2 10% | 29 -13% | 29 -13% | 28 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.3 | 28 -6% | 26.2 -0% | 31 -18% | 36 -37% | 30 -14% |
Load Average * | 33.9 | 43 -27% | 31.4 7% | 50 -47% | 50 -47% | 48 -42% |
Load Maximum * | 62 | 53 15% | 53.8 13% | 57 8% | 58 6% | 52 16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 48.4 | 53 | 54 | 52 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
散热是可以接受的:笔记本电脑在负载下会明显发热,但总体而言,只是适度发热。在日常使用中,温度保持在绿色区域。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.8 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | 10% | -8% | 10% | -16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.5 | 53 -28% | 41.8 -1% | 46 -11% | 42 -1% | 46 -11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 51.8 | 48 7% | 41.4 20% | 49 5% | 51 2% | 57 -10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.6 | 30 5% | 29 8% | 37 -17% | 27 15% | 38 -20% |
Idle Bottom * | 34.5 | 30 13% | 30.4 12% | 38 -10% | 26 25% | 42 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
压力测试(Prime95和Furmark连续运行)是一种极端情况,有助于检查系统在全负荷下的稳定性。CPU(4至4.1 GHz)和GPU(2,310 MHz)在整个测试中以高时钟速度运行。
发言人
立体声扬声器能产生体面的声音,但基本上没有低音。通过连接耳机或外部扬声器,可以获得更好的音频体验。
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--使用宏碁电脑没有体力上的抱怨
消耗功率
在能源需求方面,没有特别的异常情况可以报告。考虑到手头的硬件,这些数值处于正常水平。压力测试和Witcher 3 ,耗电量略有下降或保持不变。PSU(330瓦)的大小是比较合适的。
Off / Standby | 0.5 / 1.4 Watt |
Idle | 11.6 / 15.6 / 16.5 Watt |
Load |
155 / 205 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 24% | -18% | -20% | -11% | -85% | -8% | -18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11.6 | 7 40% | 8.1 30% | 12 -3% | 11 5% | 31 -167% | 12.4 ? -7% | 13.5 ? -16% |
Idle Average * | 15.6 | 10 36% | 15.9 -2% | 16 -3% | 16 -3% | 35 -124% | 17.5 ? -12% | 18.9 ? -21% |
Idle Maximum * | 16.5 | 15 9% | 37.2 -125% | 26 -58% | 24 -45% | 46 -179% | 24.2 ? -47% | 26.7 ? -62% |
Load Average * | 155 | 86 45% | 90.9 41% | 115 26% | 104 33% | 120 23% | 98.2 ? 37% | 106.6 ? 31% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 154.8 | 160.6 -4% | 189.6 -22% | 191.6 -24% | 185.4 -20% | 202 -30% | ||
Load Maximum * | 205 | 172 16% | 263.5 -29% | 319 -56% | 272 -33% | 268 -31% | 223 ? -9% | 250 ? -22% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
在Wi-Fi(使用脚本加载网站)和视频测试(循环播放Big Buck Bunny短片(H.264编码,FHD))中,这台16英寸机器的运行时间分别为9小时和10小时14分钟。在这两项测试中,笔记本电脑的节能功能被停用,显示屏亮度被设置为150cd/m²。此外,在视频测试期间,无线电模块被关闭。
AN16-41提供了非常好的运行时间,让大多数竞争对手望尘莫及。然而,它不能很好地管理卓越的价值观,在 华硕TUF Gaming A16.后者得益于更节能的Zen 4 APU。
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 62.3 Wh | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 19% | -48% | -45% | -7% | -19% | -26% | |
Reader / Idle | 729 | 1217 67% | 392 -46% | 345 -53% | 679 -7% | 601 -18% | 565 ? -22% |
H.264 | 614 | 746 21% | 252 -59% | 472 -23% | 371 -40% | 409 ? -33% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 540 | 745 38% | 240 -56% | 232 -57% | 489 -9% | 410 -24% | 376 ? -30% |
Load | 105 | 52 -50% | 61 -42% | 96 -9% | 118 12% | 112 7% | 85.6 ? -18% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 一个明亮的面板,长的电池寿命
视频编辑、渲染,当然还有游戏,代表了Nitro 16的核心竞争力。Ryzen 7 7735HS和 GeForce RTX 4070提供了必要的动力。这两个芯片都以持续的高时钟速度运行。一个快速的PCIe 4固态硬盘(1TB)提供了所需的存储空间,并确保了短的加载时间。
有了Nitro 16 AN16-41,宏碁在其投资组合中拥有了一个配置良好的中档游戏笔记本电脑。
这台笔记本电脑不会过度发热,在正确的设置下会产生适度的背景噪音。内置的IPS显示屏(16英寸,2560 x 1600像素,165赫兹),其有利于工作的16:10长宽比,给我们留下了深刻印象。特别是,它的亮度水平很高。
电池充满电(90Wh)后,实际运行时间约为9至10小时--非常好的数字。另一个积极因素:电池可以通过USB-C适配器充电(最小65瓦,20伏)--两个USB-C端口都支持Power Delivery,这意味着你不必总是在附近准备笨重的专有PSU(330瓦)。
另一个选择是以Legion Pro 5 16IRX8.它提供了比Nitro更多的计算能力,但电池寿命明显较差。这款Aorus 15 XE5将是预算的替代方案:相反,较低的性能水平反映在相当低的价格(1599美元)上。
价格和可用性
宏碁Nitro 16 AN16-41的一个变体,配备Ryzen 9 7940HS CPU和RTX 4070,在亚马逊上售价1696美元。
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
- 06/11/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.