华为 Nova 11 Pro 智能手机评测：充电快如离弦之箭的智能手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Huawei Nova 11 Pro SD 778G 4G, Adreno 642L | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" | 2652x1200 | |
| 86 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Huawei Nova 10 Pro SD 778G 4G, Adreno 642L | 191 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" | 2652x1200 | |
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Xiaomi 12T Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6 | 202 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2712x1220 | |
| 86.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Motorola Edge 40 Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9 | 171 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
| 88.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Google Pixel 7 Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7 | 197 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" | 2400x1080 |
表壳和功能压花人造革
华为 Nova 11 Pro 第一眼就会给人带来惊喜。纤薄的外壳、边缘拉伸的玻璃以及背面硕大的摄像头模块绝对吸引眼球。此外，背面采用黑色或亮绿色仿皮材质，并带有浮雕 Nova 徽标。
手机手感非常舒适，握在手中稳固且符合人体工程学，没有明显的材质过渡。屏幕由昆仑玻璃保护，华为称昆仑玻璃是市场上最耐摔耐刮的显示屏玻璃之一。互联网上的跌落测试和我们自己的经验都表明，屏幕玻璃通常能顺利经受跌落。
这款手机目前在华为网络商店的售价为 699 欧元，你可以获得 256 GB 的大容量存储空间和 8 GB 的运行内存--这意味着 Nova 11 Pro 提供了物超所值的常规功能。
遗憾的是，USB-C 端口只能以 USB 2.0 的速度传输数据。最多只能通过无线方式将显示输出到外部显示器。它配备了 NFC 和两个 SIM 卡插槽。不过，没有用于扩展存储空间的 microSD 读卡器。
通信、软件和操作：老问题挥之不去
在无线局域网连接方面，Nova 11 Pro 使用的是 WiFi-6 标准，这在高端手机中仍然很常见。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行的测试中，数据传输有点不稳定。我们看到传输速率有几次明显下降，在多次重复测试中也时有发生。
Nova 11 Pro 不支持 5G，这在这个价格区间的 2023 设备中非常罕见。不过，这是由于华为公司受到贸易限制，无法从美国获得 5G 调制解调器。因此，您只能使用 4G LITE。
尽管如此，该手机仍然支持宽频，可以让你在大多数国际漫游旅行中顺利使用手机上网。在我们的测试中，信号质量也非常好。
软件方面也存在限制：谷歌应用程序默认情况下无法在华为 Nova 11 Pro 上运行，只能通过技巧激活。这在我们的测试中运行得相当流畅。不过，也有一些小麻烦，比如应用程序启动前的广告，以及将自己的数据委托给除华为和谷歌之外提供虚拟环境的未知第三方的不确定性。
这款手机搭载的华为 EMUI 13 正式版基于 HarmonyOS。事实上，HarmonyOS 的基础仍然是Android 的开源部分，这一点从你可以很容易地从互联网上下载Android 应用并安装到手机上就可以看出来。
此外，还有许多专门针对华为手机的应用程序，可以在应用程序库中找到。许多广告应用程序在手机上是可见的，但目前只是一个下载链接，所以你可以很容易地忽略或删除它们。在测试时，安全更新是从 2023 年 3 月开始的，因此时间较长。
得益于 120 Hz 的屏幕，手机的操作非常流畅。指纹传感器位于屏幕后方，解锁非常可靠和精确；只是位置可能会稍高一些。通过面部识别解锁也是可行的，但这是通过相对不安全的 2D 图像来实现的。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Huawei Nova 10 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 12T | |
| Motorola Edge 40 | |
| Google Pixel 7 | |
| Huawei Nova 11 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Google Pixel 7 | |
| Xiaomi 12T | |
| Motorola Edge 40 | |
| Huawei Nova 10 Pro | |
| Huawei Nova 11 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Google Pixel 7 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Google Pixel 7 | |
相机：出色的系统，清晰度高
主摄像头采用 5000 万像素传感器，但没有光学防抖（OIS）功能。通常只使用四分之一的分辨率来实现更高的感光度。我们非常喜欢拍摄出来的照片。由于采用了特殊的传感器，照片的细节层次很高，色彩还原也非常好。图像的清晰度也令人信服。
即使在弱光和高对比度环境下，照片也能显示出良好的亮度和相当清晰的图像。在实验室中，即使在照片边缘，照片的清晰度也很高。即使在 1 勒克斯的亮度下，测试图仍然清晰可辨，但许多细节会丢失。
视频可以 4K 格式录制，最高 30 帧/秒。录制的影片色彩鲜艳，自动对焦快速可靠，亮度调节良好。
因此，该相机系统绝对可以与高端设备相媲美，但也存在一些局限性。在忙碌的情况下，光学图像稳定器会缺失，无法拍摄 8K 视频，而潜望式摄像头缺乏光学变焦功能也会给图像合成带来一些困难。
说到光学变焦，前置摄像头是有的！是的，你没看错，前置的 6000 万像素镜头至少可以通过 2 倍变焦将物体拉近一些。此外，还有一个 800 万像素的人像摄像头，用于拍摄特写，这意味着正面也有摄像头。这些摄像头位于屏幕上部的药丸状冲孔中，自拍效果非常好。我们的测试照片显示了许多细节，即使在较暗的区域也能拍出合格的构图。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera LowLightHauptkamera Weitwinkel
显示屏OLED 显示屏不太明亮
OLED 屏幕是包装的一部分，华为 Nova 11 Pro 的分辨率为 2,652 x 1,200，比竞争对手略高，甚至令人信服。由于永久启用了直流调光功能，在我们的测试中，屏幕只显示出 120 Hz 的刷新率，但除此之外没有 PWM 闪烁。
亮度略低于同类产品，但仍适合室外使用，最高可达 719 cd/m²。我们看到灰阶中的偏蓝现象非常明显，但屏幕对色彩的还原一般都相当准确。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 729 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.271
| Huawei Nova 11 Pro OLED, 2652x1200, 6.8" | Huawei Nova 10 Pro OLED, 2652x1200, 6.8" | Xiaomi 12T AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 40 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Google Pixel 7 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 111% | -3% | 6% | -76% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.1 ? | 1.08 ? 2% | 1.2 ? -9% | 1.14 ? -4% | 4.61 ? -319% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.9 ? | 1.02 ? -13% | 0.89 ? 1% | 0.89 ? 1% | 1.89 ? -110% |
| PWM Frequency | 120.1 | 532 343% | 120 0% | 144 20% | 360 200% |
| Screen | 22% | 26% | 13% | 27% | |
| Brightness middle | 729 | 798 9% | 915 26% | 1023 40% | 936 28% |
| Brightness | 719 | 802 12% | 914 27% | 1042 45% | 947 32% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 97 5% | 98 7% | 90 -2% | 95 3% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.39 | 1.1 21% | 1.1 21% | 1.6 -15% | 1.3 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.74 | 2.7 43% | 2.7 43% | 4.3 9% | 2.7 43% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.7 39% | 2 29% | 2.8 -0% | 1.4 50% |
| Gamma | 2.271 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6738 96% | 6374 102% | 6457 101% | 6457 101% | 6664 98% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 67% /
51% | 12% /
16% | 10% /
10% | -25% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120.1 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列
性能、排放和电池寿命：骁龙 778G 开始显老
Nova 11 Pro 所选用的高通骁龙 778G 4GSoc 当然是迫不得已，因为华为没有从美国获得具有 5G 功能的 SoC。该处理器在性能方面也略显落后，尽管在大多数情况下足以满足日常流畅使用。尤其是图形处理性能，对于这个价位的手机来说太低了。
UFS 3.1 板载存储颇具竞争力，但内存控制器无法充分利用全部功率。
在长时间高负荷运行的情况下，手机会变得非常热。在压力下，我们测得的最高温度为 52.3 °C。不过，这只是在有限的情况下，日常使用时的温度应该会低得多。
处理器在高温下似乎也没有任何问题。在 3DMark 压力测试中，即使经过多次运行，它的性能依然保持不变。
下边缘的扬声器由手机听筒提供支持，因此也可以产生轻微的立体声效果。扬声器的整体音量并不大，而且在歌曲的精确度方面存在问题，因此歌曲在高音量下往往会变成一团浆糊，几乎无法再辨别出单个乐器。
USB 和蓝牙音频输出干净利落。虽然不能使用 aptX 编解码器，但支持 SBC、AAC 和 LDAC 等其他重要标准。
遗憾的是，在 150 尼特的标准 Wi-Fi 浏览测试中，华为 Nova 11 Pro 的 4500 毫安时电池仅取得了平庸的成绩。11:29 小时的续航时间对于工作日或上学日来说已经足够，但在正常使用过程中，你无法避免每天晚上为手机充电。
华为集成的 100 W 充电技术和配套的充电器都很不错。只需充电 10 分钟，就能轻松提供足够使用几个小时的电量。
| Huawei Nova 11 Pro | Huawei Nova 10 Pro | Xiaomi 12T | Motorola Edge 40 | Google Pixel 7 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | 74% | 40% | 3% | 37% | 45% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1009.1 | 1013.91 0% | 1834.32 82% | 1876.88 86% | 1280.81 27% | 1749 ? 73% | 1839 ? 82% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 809 | 846.82 5% | 1768.39 119% | 1587.93 96% | 879.39 9% | 1163 ? 44% | 1425 ? 76% |
| Random Read 4KB | 229.8 | 218.19 -5% | 342.8 49% | 235.66 3% | 210.47 -8% | 286 ? 24% | 277 ? 21% |
| Random Write 4KB | 303 | 280.18 -8% | 437.07 44% | 229.44 -24% | 253.92 -16% | 319 ? 5% | 309 ? 2% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.3 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Edge 40 | |
| Google Pixel 7 | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Edge 40 | |
| Huawei Nova 11 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 7 | |
| Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability | |
| Google Pixel 7 | |
扬声器
Huawei Nova 11 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Xiaomi 12T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 40 | |
| Google Pixel 7 | |
| Huawei Nova 11 Pro | |
| Huawei Nova 10 Pro | |
Pros
Cons
结论：高价手机，硬件不足
无论制裁是否合理，从技术角度来看，华为不能在西方世界销售搭载 5G 和谷歌服务的手机无疑是一种损失。华为 Nova 11 Pro 拥有与众不同的外观、超快的充电技术、出色的摄像头和带高频直流调光功能的 OLED 屏幕，无疑具有一些独特的卖点。
不过，与这个价位相比，它的 SoC 速度太慢，电池续航时间尚可，但赶不上当前的设备，Wi-Fi 吞吐量在数据传输速率方面有点不稳定。
如果你喜欢华为 Nova 11 Pro 的外观，不妨再等等，等手机降价后再购买，这样才会物有所值--当然，同时也要考虑到你必须面对的限制。
华为 Nova 11 Pro 看起来非常时尚，几分钟就能充满电，摄像头的画质也非常好。不过，由于受到制裁，您必须使用 5G 和谷歌服务。
Honor 是一个不错的选择，它采用了华为的许多技术，可以说继承了华为在西方的传统。例如 Honor Magic4 Pro提供更好的变焦功能和 5G。该产品已在互联网上低价销售，例如在亚马逊（amazon.de）。
摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉 Edge 40是另一个可行的选择，它运行迅速，并能以纯粹的Android 13 和 5G 功能令人信服。
价格和供应情况
在测试期间，华为 Nova 11 Pro 的黑色和绿色配色仅在中欧由制造商直接提供，售价为 699 欧元。
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
- 07/18/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
