Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Edge 40评测：纤薄轻巧的素食皮套

吸引眼球。

任何想要购买最好的摩托罗拉智能手机的人都能在该制造商的Edge系列中找到他们想要的，即6.55英寸的Edge 40。这款轻薄的中端智能手机采用素食皮革后盖，配备明亮的144 Hz OLED显示屏，性能和电池续航时间也令人印象深刻。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
摩托罗拉边缘40

Edge 40是摩托罗拉旗舰智能手机Edge 40 Pro的廉价版。 Edge 40 Pro。Edge 40比Edge 40 Pro便宜约300美元，价格公道，设备齐全。

配置 骁龙8代2的骁龙8代2没有用于Edge 40，而是采用了稳健的中端 联发科Dimensity 8020。我们的测试机也提供了较少的RAM（8GB对12GB），只配备了两个摄像头传感器，而不是三个，但这些也产生了50MP的分辨率。

Edge 40的OLED屏幕略小于6.67英寸的Edge 40 Pro，为6.55英寸，分辨率也是2400 x 1080像素。由于外形尺寸较小，Edge 40的像素密度略高（402对394 PPI）。刷新率为144 Hz，而Edge 40 Pro可达165 Hz。

Motorola Edge 40 (Edge 40 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G77 MP9
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.55 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive, OLED, 360 Hz touch rate, peak brightness 1200 nits, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 234 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Ambient light, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, SAR sensor, Magnetometer (compass), DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Miracast, eSIM
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41/42/43/66), 5G (Band n1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78), Head SAR 0.99 W/kg, Body SAR 1.49 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.49 x 158.43 x 71.99
Battery
4400 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (OmniVision OV50A, f/1.4, 1/1.5", 1.0 µm pixel size, omni-directional PDAF, OIS) + 13MP (Hynix HI1336, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixel size, 120° FOV), video recording up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4, 0.7 µm pixel size, video recording up to 4K@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 68W charger (max 11V/6.2A), USB-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, Quick start guide, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof
Weight
171 g, Power Supply: 81 g
Price
600 Euro
Links
Motorola homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
86.8 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Motorola Edge 40
Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9		171 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
88.5 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Google Pixel 7
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		197 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"2400x1080
86.4 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L		155 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L		193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5		202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2340x1080
87.7 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		205 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220

表壳 - 亚克力或人造革轻质表壳

Edge 40采用了与Edge 40 Pro相同的设计语言。的设计语言相同。这款超薄智能手机的边角与屏幕的长边一样圆润，并汇聚成一个纤薄的铝制边框。总体而言，Edge 40制造精良，给人留下了宝贵而坚固的印象。它的高度为7.49毫米，最大重量为171克，对于同尺寸的智能手机来说非常轻薄。

如果您选择 "日蚀黑"、"星云绿 "或"万紫千红"，这些机型的后盖均由素食皮革制成，使智能手机非常易于握持。总体而言，Edge的握持感要比Edge 40 Pro更有安全感，后者的玻璃后盖是高端智能手机的典型设计。在第四种颜色月光蓝中，Edge 40的重量更轻，仅为167克。不过，背面采用亚光亚克力材料，而非人造革。

Edge 40通过了IP68认证，即防水防尘。这允许手机在浅水中浸泡几分钟而不会损坏（在1.5米的淡水中最长浸泡30分钟）。摩托罗拉没有说明显示屏玻璃的防护等级。

摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40

尺寸比较

❌
163.1 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 205 g159.2 mm 75.8 mm 8.3 mm 193.5 g158.2 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 202 g159.4 mm 74.2 mm 6.8 mm 155 g158.43 mm 71.99 mm 7.49 mm 171 g155.6 mm 73.2 mm 8.7 mm 197 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - nano SIM卡和eSIM卡双卡双待

摩托罗拉Edge 40的每种颜色版本都配备了相同的内存配置，包括8GB LPDDR4X内存和256GB UFS 3.1闪存。由于没有microSD插槽，因此无法进行扩展。

Edge 40的USB-C端口以USB 2.0速度工作，支持USB OTG。由于没有3.5毫米插孔，它还必须用于连接有线音频设备。

SIM卡插槽只能插入nano-SIM卡，但也可在设置中激活eSIM配置文件。除NFC和蓝牙5.2外，该智能手机还支持DRM Widevine L1。后者可播放流媒体服务的高分辨率内容。

左侧：音量按钮、电源按钮
左侧：音量按钮、电源按钮
右侧：无连接
右侧：无连接
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、SIM 卡插槽
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、SIM 卡插槽

软件 - 更新至Android 14 保证

摩托罗拉为Edge 40配备了接近原版的Android 13。只有少数软件，如专有的Moto 和Ready For应用程序。此外还预装了一些第三方应用程序，如TikTok或Marktguru，但这些应用程序都可以卸载。

根据upport网站、摩托罗拉保证将操作系统升级到Android 14。制造商并未透露最终实际会有多少次升级，但可以肯定的是会有两次操作系统升级。Android 安全更新更为具体，因为Edge 40计划在2028年1月之前每两个月接受一次安全更新。在6月中旬审查时，安全补丁是从4月1日开始的，因此按照摩托罗拉的标准仍然是最新的。

与 Edge 40 Pro、Edge 40还配备了摩托罗拉的Ready For技术，该技术与旗舰版不同，不支持USB-C连接，但。通过Ready For，Edge 40的屏幕内容可以镜像到电视、外部显示器、PC或平板电脑上。

摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40

通信和GNSS - 摩托罗拉Edge 40，带WiFi 6

如今，几乎没有一款中端智能手机不配备WiFi 6，Edge 40也不例外。虽然它不能利用6GHz频段进行传输，但与我们的华硕ROG Rapture AXE 11000参考路由器配合使用时，仍然实现了快速稳定的传输速率。峰值速率为942 MBit/s，这使得Edge 40成为对比设备中速度最快的智能手机之一。谷歌 谷歌Pixel 7在6GHz频段的数据吞吐量甚至更快。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
904 (816min - 917max) MBit/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
843 (813min - 856max) MBit/s 0%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
839 (774min - 879max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)
714 MBit/s -15%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
672 (443min - 729max) MBit/s -20%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
942 (912min - 964max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
936 (863min - 963max) MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
824 (757min - 858max) MBit/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
750 (546min - 831max) MBit/s -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)
729 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1716 (845min - 1757max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1902, n=76, last 2 years)
1440 MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (876min - 953max) MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (926min - 951max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1757 (1694min - 1797max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=76, last 2 years)
1371 MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (884min - 949max) MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
598 (517min - 731max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø946 (876-953)
Motorola Edge 30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø946 (884-949)
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, ARM Mali-G77 MP9; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø836 (774-879)
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, ARM Mali-G77 MP9; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø942 (912-964)
室内GPS信号
室内GPS信号
室外GPS信号
室外GPS信号

Edge 40使用GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a) 和Beidou (B1, B2a)卫星导航服务确定其位置。因此，智能手机在静止时可获得非常精确的位置。我们的定位精度在室内可达2米，在室外可达1米。

为了测试Edge 40的实际导航能力，我们骑了10公里的自行车。除了一些小的异常值外，智能手机记录的路线几乎与直接对比的Garmin Venu 2健身智能手表一样精确。总而言之，Edge 40非常适合导航任务。

GPS测试：总结
GPS测试：总结
GPS测试：环湖航行
GPS测试：环湖航行
GPS测试：循环
GPS测试：循环

电话和语音质量

Edge 40支持除5G Sub6以外的所有常见蜂窝标准。它拥有21个4G频段和14个5G频段，提供了稳定的频率覆盖，因此几乎在任何地方都能接收到信号。

拨打电话时，即使在免提模式下，智能手机也能将我们的声音清晰、易懂地传输给我们的对话伙伴。支持VoLTE和WiFi通话。

在Android 设置中，Edge 40在 "关于手机 "和 "法规批准"菜单项下显示了SAR值。0.99瓦/千克（头部SAR）和1.49瓦/千克（身体SAR）属于正常范围。

摄像头 - 配备OmniVision OV50A的明亮双摄像头

使用自拍相机拍照
使用自拍相机拍照

Edge 40具有与Edge 40 Pro类似的摄像头设置。 Edge 40 Pro尽管它缺少一个长焦镜头。它配备了50MP主摄像头、13MP超广角摄像头和32MP自拍摄像头。后者在日光下也能拍摄出清晰的照片。与主摄像头一样，它也能以30 FPS的最大速度录制4K视频。

5,000万像素主摄像头采用OmniVision OV50A作为图像传感器，通过4合1像素分选技术拍摄1,200万像素的照片。得益于f/2.4的大光圈和光学图像稳定器，它在低残余光下也能拍摄出令人惊喜的低噪点照片。白天拍摄的照片也令人信服，色彩自然，细节丰富，即使在图像的暗处也是如此。

超广角摄像头（Hynix HI1336）的视场角为120°，分辨率为1300万像素。在细节丰富度和清晰度方面，它无法与主摄像头相媲美，但也能很好地完成任务。不过，在图像边缘，图像会变得相当模糊。

使用主相机拍照
使用主相机拍照
使用主相机拍照
使用主相机拍照
使用主相机拍照
使用主相机拍照
使用主相机拍照
使用主相机拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light
orginal image
click to load images

在测试实验室，我们仔细观察了主摄像头在特定光线条件下的表现。在最佳光照条件下，它能够相当准确地再现色彩，并清晰锐利地显示测试图。在1勒克斯的残余光线下，色彩保真度仍然相对较高，测试图仍然完全清晰可见，但不再特别锐利。

ColorChecker
6.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 40: 5.36 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 11.33 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.6 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
27 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 40: 22.66 ∆E min: 11.19 - max: 34.22 ∆E

配件和保修 - 含68瓦电源

Edge 40配有68瓦电源（11V/6.2A）、USB-C数据线、SIM卡针、保护套和快速入门指南。摩托罗拉商店提供耳机和蓝牙扬声器等多种配件。

Edge 40提供24个月的保修服务。还可以选择通过Moto Care 保险将保修期延长至3年，并增加意外保险。

输入设备和操作 - 144 Hz和手势控制

Edge 40的144赫兹显示屏可确保流畅显示内容。触摸屏每秒扫描360次，对输入做出非常精确的反应，因此响应速度也很好。显示屏玻璃的长边是弧形的，因此边缘特别窄。这可能会导致输入错误增加，但我们在测试过程中没有遇到任何问题。

Edge 40的指纹传感器位于显示屏下方，能够可靠地检测到扫描到的手指，并快速解锁智能手机。通过面部识别解锁也几乎没有延迟。由于验证是通过2D软件进行的，因此需要足够明亮的环境。在黑暗环境中，显示屏的余光通常足以实现面部解锁。

在日常生活中，Edge 40为用户提供了实用的手势控制功能。例如，如果您用手中的智能手机做双劈动作，手电筒就会打开。如果您转动手腕两次，照相机就会启动。另一个实用功能是，如果您接到电话或通知，显示屏边缘默认亮起。Edge 40不具备常亮显示功能。

纵向键盘
纵向键盘
横向键盘
横向键盘

显示屏 - OLED，四位数亮度

子像素网格
子像素网格

据摩托罗拉称，Edge 40的HDR10+兼容OLED显示屏分辨率为2400 x 1080像素，峰值亮度可达1200尼特。在我们的测试中，这款智能手机甚至超过了这一标准，在APL18测试中达到了1345 cd/m²。

如果将测量从小图像部分扩展到全屏幕，结果也不会差多少。Edge 40仍然达到了非常出色的1042 cd/m²，因此实际上与Edge 40 Pro（1055 cd/m²）相当。它明显优于其 Edge 30的最高亮度为655 cd/m²。关闭亮度传感器后，OLED显示屏的最大亮度为510 cd/m²，最低亮度为3.41 cd/m²。

Edge 40使用脉宽调制（PWM）进行亮度控制。PWM闪烁在很大程度上与所有亮度水平下的刷新率相对应，因此不应该成为一个问题。不过，PWM异常值较多，因此敏感用户肯定会受到影响。显示设置 "中的 "防止闪烁"按钮可以防止显示器在黑暗环境中闪烁。

995
cd/m²		1029
cd/m²		1097
cd/m²
1000
cd/m²		1023
cd/m²		1103
cd/m²
998
cd/m²		1027
cd/m²		1106
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1106 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1042 cd/m² Minimum: 3.41 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 1023 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Motorola Edge 40
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Google Pixel 7
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"		Motorola Edge 30
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"		Nothing Phone (1)
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"		Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
16%
-6%
6%
-2%
17%
Brightness middle
1023
936
-9%
632
-38%
620
-39%
940
-8%
913
-11%
Brightness
1042
947
-9%
630
-40%
625
-40%
935
-10%
913
-12%
Brightness Distribution
90
95
6%
92
2%
98
9%
99
10%
95
6%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
1.3
19%
1.46
9%
1.24
22%
2.4
-50%
1
37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.3
2.7
37%
3.32
23%
2.31
46%
3.2
26%
2.4
44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
1.4
50%
2.6
7%
1.7
39%
2.2
21%
1.8
36%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.25 98%
2.209 100%
2.318 95%
2.05 107%
2.23 99%
CCT
6457 101%
6664 98%
6755 96%
6325 103%
6422 101%
6273 104%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 144 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 144 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 144 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25%显示亮度
25%
50%显示亮度
50%
75%显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

在固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

OLED显示屏的色彩表现可通过饱和 与自然 色彩配置文件进行调整。此外，您还可以在冷色 和暖色之间的七个级别中改变色温。自然 "模式下的画质最佳。色彩和灰度在理想范围内，Delta-E为<3，RGB平衡也相当均衡。

色彩保真度（色彩配置文件：自然色，色彩目标空间：sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩配置文件：自然色，色彩目标空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩配置文件：自然色，色彩目标空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩配置文件：自然色，色彩目标空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩配置文件：自然，色彩目标空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩配置文件：自然，色彩目标空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩配置文件：自然，色彩目标空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩配置文件：自然，色彩目标空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.419 ms rise
↘ 0.473 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5225 ms rise
↘ 0.6135 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

视角稳定的OLED屏幕在户外也能显示清晰的画面。虽然无法避免反光，但Edge 40的高亮度储备意味着即使在阳光直射下，屏幕内容仍可清晰阅读。

室外使用（阳光直射下）
室外使用（阳光直射下）
室外使用（阴凉处）
室外使用（阴凉处）
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 联发科Dimensity 8020用于摩托罗拉智能手机

摩托罗拉为Edge 40配备了联发科Dimensity 8020。该八核SoC拥有8个内核，分为4个ARM Cortex A78性能内核（2.6 GHz）和4个ARM Cortex A55节能内核（2 GHz）。处理器 ARM Mali-G77 MP9作为集成图形单元。

Dimensity 8020远远无法与骁龙8代2在 Edge 40 Pro、但它提供了稳定的中端性能。这也足以击败不少竞争对手，包括 三星Galaxy A54 5G及其 Exynos 1380SoC, 以及 无手机 (1)采用了 骁龙778G+ 5G处理器。在对比设备中，谷歌 谷歌Pixel 7的 Tensor G2是Edge 40最强劲的竞争对手。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1356 Points +62%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1050 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
835 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
835 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
826 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
824 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
783 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
4432 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3310 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
3310 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3265 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2998 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2872 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2817 Points -15%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1120 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
1120 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1006 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3600 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
3600 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2828 Points -21%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1086424 Points +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points +16%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
773655 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
687619 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
687619 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
582264 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
553328 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
507481 Points -26%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
16611 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
16611 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
15194 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
15067 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
13024 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points -22%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11662 Points -30%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
10530 Points -37%
CrossMark - Overall
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
898 Points +45%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
887 Points +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points +43%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
760 Points +23%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
732 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
703 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
620 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
620 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6423 Points +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +52%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
6247 Points +50%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4932 Points +19%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4768 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4666 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4153 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
4153 Points 0%
System
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10940 Points +78%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10424 Points +70%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10212 Points +66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +66%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
9601 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
8961 Points +46%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
6136 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
6136 Points 0%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +54%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6152 Points +40%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5392 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4857 Points +10%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4763 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4762 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4404 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
4404 Points 0%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +105%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
16742 Points +103%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
16001 Points +94%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
8229 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
8229 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8175 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
7516 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
7108 Points -14%
Web
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1838 Points +37%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1686 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1533 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1511 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1337 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
1337 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1273 Points -5%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
68954 Points +216%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
42556 Points +95%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21840 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
21840 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20784 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20239 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5835 Points -73%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points +118%
Motorola Edge 40
MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
11860 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
  ()
11860 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1234 Points -90%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1002 Points -92%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
622 Points -95%

Edge 40在图形基准测试中表现出色，能够将竞争对手，例如三星的Galaxy A54 5G等竞争对手。然而，与合成基准测试相比，它比 谷歌Pixel 7的 Mali G710 MP7GPU提供了更强大的性能。然而，没有一款对比设备能够击败 小米12T Pro及其 骁龙8代1.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2754 Points +124%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1800 Points +47%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1228 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points -35%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
768 Points -37%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
686 Points -44%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2786 Points +121%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1841 Points +46%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1262 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
813 Points -36%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
764 Points -39%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points -45%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11075 Points +151%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6660 Points +51%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4405 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points -35%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2831 Points -36%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2576 Points -42%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6513 Points +45%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4490 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2826 Points -37%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2814 Points -37%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2570 Points -43%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2854 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2771 Points
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2718 Points
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5928 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5412 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4915 Points
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4696 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4513 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4194 Points
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5564 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5415 Points
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4547 Points -16%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4518 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4227 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4086 Points -25%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20452 Points +138%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11491 Points +34%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8601 Points
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6240 Points -27%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5759 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5129 Points -40%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12876 Points +69%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8192 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7606 Points
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5763 Points -24%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5428 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4897 Points -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -14%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps -32%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -35%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -35%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps +127%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
249 fps +23%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
202 fps
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
148 fps -27%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
119 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +173%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps +105%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps +93%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps +57%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
275 fps +461%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps +169%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +82%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps +63%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps +183%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps +115%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +63%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +15%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
185 fps +311%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +98%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +42%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +16%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +88%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +55%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -2%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -35%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps +147%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +58%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -14%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -28%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +61%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +45%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -21%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +110%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +57%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -29%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps +74%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +41%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -13%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps +132%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +42%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -32%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +128%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +52%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.2 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.7 fps -27%
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.6 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -36%

Edge 40的浏览器性能并不出众，甚至不如Edge 30。但在日常使用中并不明显。不过，由于网站加载和打开速度很快，因此在日常使用中并不明显。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +79%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)
98.755 Points +47%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
96.314 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
94.611 Points +41%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
90.283 Points +34%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
73.679 Points +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020 ()
67.3 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
67.258 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +95%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
100 runs/min +43%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)
72.28 runs/min +3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
70.5 runs/min +1%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
69.9 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020 ()
69.9 runs/min 0%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
66.48 runs/min -5%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)
53.71 runs/min -23%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
97 Points +24%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
93 Points +19%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
93 Points +19%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)
91 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
78 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020 ()
78 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
69 Points -12%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
124 Points +43%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
116 Points +33%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)
108 Points +24%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
102 Points +17%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
98 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
87 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020 ()
87 Points 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Google Pixel 7
45158 Points +60%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
33801 Points +20%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)
33644 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
32109 Points +14%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
28282 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020 ()
28282 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
24488 Points -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
1796.1 ms * -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020 ()
1739 ms * -0%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)
1738.9 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +10%
Motorola Edge 30 (Chrome 102.0.5005.125)
1335 ms * +23%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)
1254.7 ms * +28%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
1208.8 ms * +30%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
1021.8 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

摩托罗拉智能手机的UFS 3.1存储确保了快速的数据传输速率，除了 小米12T Pro 5G之外，其速度快于所有对比设备。

Motorola Edge 40Google Pixel 7Motorola Edge 30Nothing Phone (1)Samsung Galaxy A54 5GXiaomi 12T Pro 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
-12%
-7%
-55%
63%
7%
10%
Sequential Read 256KB
1876.88
1280.81
-32%
1514.62
-19%
1638
-13%
528.32
-72%
1870.78
0%
1749 ?(950 - 2037, n=101)
-7%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
-2%
Sequential Write 256KB
1587.93
879.39
-45%
965.35
-39%
1351.9
-15%
335.39
-79%
1726.23
9%
1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101)
-27%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
-10%
Random Read 4KB
235.66
210.47
-11%
241.72
3%
240.6
2%
236.23
0%
543.38
131%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=101)
21%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
18%
Random Write 4KB
229.44
253.92
11%
249.14
9%
228.2
-1%
70.52
-69%
483.87
111%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=102)
39%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
35%

游戏--边缘上的乐趣 40

ARM GPU Mali G77 MP9集成在 联发科Dimensity 8020确保了良好的游戏性能。在最大可选HDR/Ultra 设置下，《PUBG Mobile》等高要求游戏能以40帧/ 秒的速度流畅运行。然而，智能手机只能在图形简单的游戏（如《地铁冲浪》）中发挥其144赫兹显示屏的潜力。

帧速率由我们的Gamebench工具测定。

Armajet
Armajet
手机
手机
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Motorola Edge 40; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60.1 (60-61)
Motorola Edge 40; PUBG Mobile; 2.6.0: Ø39.9 (36-41)
Motorola Edge 40; Subway Surfers; 3.13.0: Ø143.6 (119-145)

排放 - 带有杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）的良好立体声扬声器

温度

Edge 40在运行时温度很高。在1小时的压力测试后，我们测得表面温度高达48.9 °C。这里需要注意的是，我们使用了要求非常苛刻的Burnout基准进行压力测试，因此如此高的温度是非常正常的。

智能手机的内部温度得到了很好的控制。3DMark压力测试表明，Edge 40可以长时间保持其性能。在最糟糕的情况下，性能仅从100%略微下降到99.2%。

Max. Load
 46.7 °C44.2 °C39.2 °C 
 46.9 °C45.9 °C41.4 °C 
 45.9 °C43.8 °C40.8 °C 
Maximum: 46.9 °C
Average: 43.9 °C
40 °C45.3 °C47.8 °C
39.3 °C43.3 °C48.9 °C
40.6 °C41.8 °C46.5 °C
Maximum: 48.9 °C
Average: 43.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 %
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.8 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % 0%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88.5 % -11%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.5 % -34%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Motorola Edge 40
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 %
Motorola Edge 30
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % 0%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 % -5%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72.9 % -27%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.53 (7.51-7.56)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.65 (8.06-11.1)
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.57 (4.54-4.59)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.12 (4.09-4.14)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.85 (4.84-4.87)
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.1 (15.7-16.7)
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø26.6 (26.5-26.7)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (25.8-39.3)
Motorola Edge 30 Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.3 (15.3-15.3)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.7 (57.2-64.7)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø34.4 (28.6-40.2)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø17 (17-17.1)
摩托罗拉边缘40
摩托罗拉边缘40

扬声器

Edge 40兼容杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）的立体声扬声器可以播放高达89.4 dB(A)的音量。深沉的音调在混音中有些代表性不足，但总体而言，音质相当饱满，对于一款中端智能手机而言非常不错。

外接音频设备可通过USB-C或蓝牙5.2连接到Edge 40。支持当前大多数蓝牙编解码器，包括SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC和LHDC v4。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.726.12520.828.5311929.94017.128.35033.4366320.9278016.632.610020.535.812516.538.316014.751.2200145225014.35931513.158.140013.662.250013.271.763012.373.580012.572.3100011.978.8125012.678.2160012.976.8200013.377.2250012.579.4315013.480.1400013.979.1500013.979.7630013.575.6800013.769.31000013.967.31250013.574.21600013.772.1SPL25.389.4N0.779.2median 13.5median 73.5Delta0.79.837.638.534.835.532.630.237.135.742.839.932.727.722.927.420.232.717.936.815.943.912471150.513.456.51160.212.666.512.571.511.870.411.477.711.57610.577.39.973.510.671.911.972.212.865.713.964.214.465.215.266.21667.815.965.116.648.725.384.60.657.5median 12.6median 65.72.18.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 40Motorola Edge 30
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 40 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Edge 30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 无线充电和足够一天使用的电量

耗电量

Edge 40的整体功耗并不明显，在负载情况下相当节能。

4400 mAh电池的充电功率可达68瓦。在测试中，空电池充电至100%需要55分钟。Edge 40还支持无线充电，充电功率可达15瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.62 / 1.78 / 1.85 Watt
Load midlight 3.02 / 8.23 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Edge 40
4400 mAh		Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh		Motorola Edge 30
4020 mAh		Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 8020
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
11%
0%
-8%
-13%
-6%
0%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.89
-44%
0.9
-45%
1
-61%
0.75
-21%
1.05
-69%
0.62 ?()
-0%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-44%
Idle Average *
1.78
1.07
40%
1.2
33%
1.2
33%
1.51
15%
1.65
7%
1.78 ?()
-0%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
18%
Idle Maximum *
1.85
1.2
35%
1.5
19%
1.5
19%
1.62
12%
1.72
7%
1.85 ?()
-0%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
13%
Load Average *
3.02
3.27
-8%
3.6
-19%
4.2
-39%
4.91
-63%
3.12
-3%
3.02 ?()
-0%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-114%
Load Maximum *
8.23
5.5
33%
7.1
14%
7.4
10%
8.93
-9%
6.02
27%
8.23 ?()
-0%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-19%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.51 (1.05-11.9)
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.34 (1.385-12)
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.05 (0.884-8.38)
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.059 (0.985-1.155)
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.907 (0.874-1.166)
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.337 (1.083-1.702)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.1 (4.97-6.61)
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.99 (7.64-11.5)
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.64 (4.38-5.25)
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.059 (0.985-1.155)
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.907 (0.874-1.166)
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.337 (1.083-1.702)

电池寿命

Edge 40的电池容量为4400毫安时，与Edge 30相比有明显增长。Edge 30(4020 mAh)相比，Edge 40的电池容量明显增加，但以中端产品的标准来看，其容量仍然不算大。不过，由于采用了节能功能，电池续航时间还是比较可观的。

在模拟网上冲浪时，Edge 40的续航时间超过15小时，在连续循环播放视频时，续航时间超过20小时。只有三星的Galaxy A54 5G和 小米12T Pro 5G但它们的电池容量比摩托罗拉的5000毫安时大很多。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 52min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 04min
Motorola Edge 40
4400 mAh		Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh		Motorola Edge 30
4020 mAh		Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-19%
-23%
-12%
8%
1%
Reader / Idle
2272
1063
-53%
1604
-29%
1813
-20%
2591
14%
1754
-23%
H.264
1235
1230
0%
1002
-19%
1059
-14%
1508
22%
1286
4%
WiFi v1.3
924
731
-21%
638
-31%
926
0%
941
2%
1085
17%
Load
304
302
-1%
268
-12%
259
-15%
284
-7%
321
6%

Pros

+ 轻薄外壳，符合IP68标准
+ 防滑真皮后盖
+ 纯Android 13
+ 明亮的真彩OLED显示屏
+ 日光下良好的相机
+ 144Hz帧频
+ 立体声扬声器
+ 附带68瓦电源适配器
+ 良好的电池寿命和无线充电

Cons

- 无 microSD 插槽
- 仅USB-C 2.0
- 操作系统升级周期短
- 无长焦镜头
- 无始终在线显示屏

摩托罗拉边缘40的结论

回顾：摩托罗拉Edge 40。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国公司提供。
回顾：摩托罗拉Edge 40。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国公司提供。

摩托罗拉Edge 40是一款非常可靠的中端智能手机，主要突出表现在其轻薄的外壳上。黑、红、绿三种颜色的机型均采用合成革后盖，手感非常舒适。

6.55英寸的Edge 40还配备了144 Hz OLED屏幕，亮度为四位数。配备8GB内存、256GB存储空间和 联发科Dimensity 8020智能手机为日常使用提供了良好的装备。

此外，它还配备了强大的5000万像素摄像头，光线输出令人印象深刻，具有良好的立体声扬声器和较长的电池续航时间，尽管电池容量相对较小。

摩托罗拉Edge 40是一款功能强大的中端智能手机，拥有明亮的144 Hz显示屏、良好的性能和较长的电池续航时间。

Edge 40在更新方面并没有给人留下很好的印象，因为你不应该期待超过两次的操作系统升级。如果这不比运行速度为USB2.0的USB-C端口或缺少microSD插槽更让你烦恼的话，那么Edge 40将是一款非常可靠的中端智能手机。

Edge 40的替代产品包括 谷歌Pixel 7和 三星Galaxy A54 5G.两者的更新周期更长，性能和硬件相当。Pixel 7还应该获得Android 16，Galaxy A54 5G甚至Android 17。

价格和供货情况

由于刚刚发布，摩托罗拉Edge目前无法通过亚马逊和百思买等典型经销商购买。

Motorola Edge 40 - 07/10/2023 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 75%
Weight
91%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
60 / 64 → 94%
Application Performance
78 / 86 → 91%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
74%
Average
80%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Edge 40评测：纤薄轻巧的素食皮套
Manuel Masiero, 2023-07-12 (Update: 2024-08-15)