Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarNvidia RTX A5500首次亮相。戴尔Precision 7670性能工作站回顾
戴尔在其新的Precision 7670系列上冒了很大的风险。它不仅是 第一个使用CAMM的生产型笔记本电脑而且，该系列本身包括一个较薄的型号和一个更强大的较厚的型号（称为 "性能 "或 "终极 "型号），具体取决于配置。我们上个月审查了较薄的型号，所以现在我们将看看较厚的型号。
除了它们在Z高度上的细微差别外，这两种型号的机箱设计和功能完全相同。我们建议查看我们的 关于较薄的Precision 7670的现有评论以了解更多关于该系列的物理特征。
我们的具体审查单位是最高端的配置，配备Core i9-12950HX CPU、RTX A5500 GPU和2400p 16:10 OLED触摸屏，价格约为7000美元。更少的SKU降至酷睿i7-12850HX或RTX A4500，但所有选项都配有相同的2400p IPS触摸屏。相比之下，更薄的Precision 7670只能上升到RTX A2000 GPU。
这一领域的竞争者包括其他16英寸移动工作站，如微星CreatorPro Z16P,惠普ZBook Studio 16，或联想ThinkPad P1 G4.
更多戴尔评论。
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance (Precision 7000 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12950HX 16 x 1.7 - 5 GHz, 147 W PL2 / Short Burst, 76 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1380 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 135 W TDP, GDDR6, 526.67, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, CAMM DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, 10-point capacitive, Samsung 160YV03, OLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM690 (Alder Lake-S PCH)
Weight
2.849 kg, Power Supply: 674 g
Price
7000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.95 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 84.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA i7-1265U, T550 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 19.2 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 89.3 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17.7 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 24.7 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 |
案例
长度和宽度与普通的薄型Precision 7670相同，而厚度和重量则分别增加了约1.3毫米和100克。在实践中很难注意到这些差异，因为普通的Precision 7670已经是较厚和较重的移动工作站之一了。
SD卡阅读器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Dell Precision 7670 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST (AV Pro V60) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA (Angelbird AV PRO V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Precision 7670 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST (AV Pro V60) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA (Angelbird AV PRO V60) | |
沟通
虽然英特尔AX211出现在所有Precision 7670 SKU上，但在我们的特定测试装置上，性能比预期的要慢。当与我们的6Ghz网络配对时，平均传输速率只有891 Mbps，而微星CreatorPro Z16P或Z16P的传输速率几乎是其两倍。 HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9各自使用相同的AX211模块。我们在两个不同的日子里重复了这个测试六次，只是为了确保，但结果并没有改善。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø873 (528-1091)
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1421 (1354-1449)
网络摄像头
10.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
维护
底部面板由六个飞利浦螺钉固定，便于维修。除了电池容量、可用存储空间的数量和小型散热器的存在之外，内部结构与更薄的Precision 7670相似。
显示
显示选项与更薄的Precision 7670上的选项相同。我们的测试装置使用相同的三星160YV03 OLED面板，承诺全P3色彩。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samsung 160YV03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 333.9 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 328.3 cd/m² Minimum: 0.77 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 325.2 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance Samsung 160YV03, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST B160QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA BOE0A52, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA BOE0A02, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NE160QDM-N63, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Precision 7670 Samsung 160YV03, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -5% | -22% | -17% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 97.6 -2% | 97.5 -2% | 68.1 -32% | 72.7 -27% | 99.9 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 96.1 -4% | 99.3 -1% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.1 | 87.4 -11% | 86.3 -12% | 70 -29% | 74.7 -24% | 97.5 -1% |
| Response Times | -441% | -475% | -1843% | -1550% | -2% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.84 ? | 12.8 ? -596% | 15.3 ? -732% | 52.8 ? -2770% | 40.8 -2117% | 1.9 ? -3% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.92 ? | 7.4 ? -285% | 6.1 ? -218% | 19.5 ? -916% | 20.8 -983% | 2 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 59.52 ? | 59.5 ? 0% | ||||
| Screen | 32% | 50% | 4% | 7% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 325.2 | 407 25% | 554 70% | 526 62% | 441 36% | 340.1 5% |
| Brightness | 328 | 388 18% | 516 57% | 499 52% | 420 28% | 342 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 88 -9% | 84 -13% | 93 -4% | 90 -7% | 98 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.27 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.59 | 1.3 72% | 1 78% | 3.6 22% | 2.6 43% | 2.5 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.65 | 2.5 67% | 2.4 69% | 6.6 14% | 6 22% | 8.19 -7% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 2.1 16% | 1.6 36% | 5.5 -120% | 4.5 -80% | 3.5 -40% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.26 97% | 2.29 96% | 2.02 109% | 2.18 101% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 6541 99% | 6437 101% | 6458 101% | 6527 100% | 6623 98% | 6704 97% |
| Contrast | 1131 | 1179 | 1697 | 1633 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 1.2 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -138% /
-64% | -143% /
-61% | -620% /
-339% | -520% /
-283% | 0% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.92 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.84 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.92 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.92 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 59.52 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 59.52 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 59.52 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
与大多数OLED面板一样，在所有亮度设置上都存在闪烁。我们能够记录到从0到57%亮度的频率为238.1赫兹，从58%到最大值的频率为59.5赫兹。
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前，我们通过戴尔优化软件将我们的设备设置为超性能模式，并将GPU设置为独立显卡。强烈建议用户熟悉Optimizer，因为它是控制笔记本电脑许多特定功能的枢纽，包括存在感检测和充电行为。
我们在软件或BIOS中找不到任何MUX开关。
处理器
多线程的性能只比酷睿i7-12850HX在我们较薄的Precision 7670。狭窄的差距并不出乎意料，但更令人惊讶的是我们的Turbo Boost的可持续性有点差。酷睿i9-12950HX.在循环运行CineBench R15 xT时，性能会随着时间的推移而下降约17%，而不是一直保持稳定。这种性能下降与我们在普通的Precision 7670上观察到的情况相似，尽管我们的性能模型的外形更厚。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2311 (2236.26-2768.74)
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2211 (2130.95-2274.54)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2518 (2462.45-2642.53)
HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA Intel Core i7-1265U: Ø664 (658.25-723.46)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1876 (1827.4-2112.04)
Dell Precision 7670 Intel Core i7-12850HX: Ø1890 (1813.24-2431.76)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6625 - 8777, n=7) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (703 - 741, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (16277 - 23113, n=7) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1465 - 1922, n=7) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (2464 - 3530, n=7) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (167 - 276, n=7) | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (138 - 193, n=7) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (65637 - 85019, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (6022 - 6318, n=7) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (14028 - 16009, n=7) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (1847 - 1945, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (18.6 - 26.5, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (34.7 - 45.4, n=7) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (0.4251 - 0.4515, n=7) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (15499 - 22868, n=7) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (77846 - 115907, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (3426 - 5069, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (102752 - 104726, n=7) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (10134 - 12823, n=7) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (37146 - 57340, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (72599 - 181128, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (996 - 1417, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (8455 - 12432, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (35479 - 42655, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
系统性能
PCMark的结果可与目前的更高端移动工作站相媲美，包括惠普ZBook Fury 15 G8.
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (6883 - 7236, n=3) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (10898 - 11465, n=3) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (8054 - 9489, n=3) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (9155 - 9944, n=3) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (1801 - 1889, n=3) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (1684 - 1785, n=3) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (2042 - 2192, n=3) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (1501 - 1585, n=3) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6883 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59731 - 64732, n=7) | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59744 - 70359, n=7) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (57750 - 67899, n=7) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (84.5 - 92.2, n=7) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon揭示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题，即使经过几次重新测试。在60 FPS的情况下，4K视频播放很流畅，没有任何掉帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
用户最多可以安装三块PCIe4 x4 NVMe M.2 2280固态硬盘，而不是更瘦小的普通型号上的两块。这 两个SK Hynix PC801驱动器被安装在RAID 0配置中，实际连续读取和写入速度高得惊人，分别为13000 MB/s和10000 MB/s。每个固态硬盘插槽都有自己的散热器和热垫用于散热。
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
12608 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
9095 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
789.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
573.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
8343 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
7516 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
59.98 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
139.7 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance: Ø4562 (3855.24-4790.1)
GPU性能
的 RTX A5500比RTX A2000大约快60%到80%。 的速度大约为60％至80％，而RTX A2000在更薄的 Precision 7670成为目前市场上最快的移动工作站之一。它并不完全比两年前的 Quadro RTX 5000中的 Acer ConceptD 9 Pro或 华硕ProArt StudioBook Pro X然而，即使在光线追踪性能方面，也是如此。这款 RTX A5000在较大的17.3英寸 微星WE76在大多数基准测试中超过了我们的RTX A5500。
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
| Average of class Workstation (9356 - 59715, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Precision 7550 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15 Gen1-20ST000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 3000 3551 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 29929 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22698 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9872 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
| Dell Precision 7670 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
当闲置的 Witcher 3一个小时，我们能够在测试的10分钟内记录到帧率的巨大下降，如下图所示。这表明程序优先级不高，或中断的背景活动有可能干扰焦点中的主要程序的性能。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU: Ø92.6 (1-100)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 183.4 | 178.1 | 166.2 | 102.6 | 99.2 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 421.2 | 306.8 | 205.4 | 101.5 | 62.5 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 193.3 | 171.3 | 161.8 | 152.9 | 131.4 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 170.1 | 138.9 | 107.8 | 78.9 | 43.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 146.2 | 134.3 | 107.8 | 92.7 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 377 | 244 | 200 | 177.9 | 129.3 | |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 171 | 125.8 | 95.3 | 75.7 | 58.5 | 31.3 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 162.9 | 135.4 | 110.4 | 89.3 | 62.7 | 30.2 |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 314.1 | 189.7 | 139.2 | 110.1 | 77.1 | 34.9 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 139 | 130 | 111 | 101 | 89 | 42 |
| Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 119 | 98 | 93 | 77 | 58 | 30 |
| Dirt 5 (2020) | 167.6 | 130 | 114.8 | 92.2 | 71.9 | 39.8 |
| Hitman 3 (2021) | 229 | 186.6 | 179.9 | 161.4 | 104.6 | 43.8 |
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 132 | 115 | 104 | 95 | 79 | 42 |
| Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 142 | 124 | 137 | 134 | 104 | 49 |
| God of War (2022) | 128.9 | 119.6 | 105.6 | 79 | 62.2 | 35.6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 93.9 | 80.2 | 79.3 | 75.7 | 45.3 | 17.8 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 190.8 | 188.2 | 163.1 | 66.4 | 40.8 | 18.8 |
排放
系统噪音
Precision 7670 Performance内部的风扇往往比更薄的Precision 7670的风扇脉冲更频繁，这可能是由于Core i9-12950HX与Core i7-12850HX的Turbo Boost上限更高。然而，当电源配置文件被设置为平衡或安静模式时，这不应该是一个问题。
总的来说，风扇噪音比我们在更薄的Precision 7670上记录的更安静。游戏负载将稳定在42至47 dB(A)的范围内，而较小的型号则为45至49 dB(A)的范围。当CPU和GPU都处于100%的利用率时，我们能够达到48 dB(A)的最大值。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 38 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 46.3 / 47.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA T550 Laptop GPU, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Dell Precision 7670 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12850HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 3% | 10% | 2% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 23.9 | 24.1 -1% | 24 -0% | 23.8 -0% | 24.3 -2% | 22.7 5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 27.1 -13% | 24 -0% | 23.8 1% | 24.3 -1% | 22.9 5% |
| Idle Average * | 24 | 27.1 -13% | 27.7 -15% | 23.8 1% | 24.3 -1% | 22.9 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 27.1 29% | 27.7 27% | 23.8 37% | 26.6 30% | 24.5 36% |
| Load Average * | 46.3 | 42.9 7% | 39.8 14% | 39.4 15% | 46.8 -1% | 48.7 -5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.9 | 44 -5% | 44.3 -6% | 40.5 3% | 46.8 -12% | 45.2 -8% |
| Load Maximum * | 47.9 | 47 2% | 47.7 -0% | 41.4 14% | 46.8 2% | 52.1 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度确实比我们在普通Precision 7670上记录的温度要高一些。当长时间运行游戏等高要求的负载时，键盘和后部的热点可以达到约40摄氏度，而在更薄的普通型号上则为35摄氏度。这些结果与我们在下面一节中的核心温度测量相吻合，我们的CPU和GPU将稳定在较高的温度。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA Intel Core i7-1265U, NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU | Dell Precision 7670 Intel Core i7-12850HX, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | 9% | 8% | 7% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 53 | 56.3 -6% | 38.7 27% | 42.1 21% | 49.9 6% | 51 4% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 43.2 | 68.3 -58% | 53.4 -24% | 48 -11% | 56.7 -31% | 45.8 -6% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 36.8 | 25.2 32% | 27.3 26% | 29.9 19% | 25.5 31% | 31.8 14% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.8 | 25.9 23% | 31.6 7% | 32.9 3% | 26.2 22% | 32.6 4% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时，时钟频率和温度几乎会瞬间跳到3.4 GHz和99 C，并且处理器功耗高达147 W。如此高的温度是不可持续的，因此时钟频率和温度会迅速下降到更稳定的2.3 GHz和78 C，并且最终处理器的功耗为76 W。
运行时的CPU和GPU温度 Witcher 3将分别稳定在77摄氏度和82摄氏度，而普通更薄的Precision 7670则为70摄氏度和80摄氏度。
如果用电池供电，性能是有限的。Fire Strike ，物理和图形得分分别为18901和9254分，而在主电源上则为28197和26260分。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 50 | 53 |
| Prime95压力 | 2.3 | -- | 78 | 59 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 0.8 - 1.4 | 500 - 1555 | 79 - 83 | 81 |
| Witcher 3 应力 | 1.1 | 1417 | 77 | 82 |
发言人
在不同的音乐类型/电话中检查内置扬声器的声音（声音、噪音、低音、最大音量...），在设备类别内进行比较，特殊功能（软件），...如何连接外部音频设备？在适当的地方测试声音接口。分析粉红噪音图。
短评：分析音箱。250字左右
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
普通的Precision 7670已经是一个耗电的机器，而Precision 7670性能更是如此。仅仅在桌面上空转就需要16瓦到47瓦，这取决于亮度水平、电源配置文件和屏幕上的OLED颜色。相比之下，大多数其他工作站通常在15瓦的范围内徘徊。
当运行像游戏这样的高要求负载时，我们的设备会消耗大约159瓦，而普通的Precision 7670则是134瓦。考虑到比Quadro A2000的图形潜力增加了70%至80%，功耗增加19%是比较小的。
一个中等大小（约15.2 x 7.8 x 2.3厘米）的240瓦交流适配器被包括在内，而普通的Precision 7670则配有一个较小的180瓦交流适配器。如下面的截图所示，当CPU和GPU的利用率为100%时，我们能够从适配器上记录到311W的临时最大耗电量。这表明Turbo Boost性能有限，而且考虑到内部设备的要求，适配器的功率可能不足。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.07 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle | 16.4 / 35.9 / 47 Watt |
| Load |
147.1 / 311 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, , OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA i7-1265U, T550 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | MSI WE76 11UM-456 i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 37% | 44% | 73% | 48% | 36% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16.4 | 10.8 34% | 7.2 56% | 4.5 73% | 9.9 40% | 7.5 54% | 10.5 36% |
| Idle Average * | 35.9 | 16.3 55% | 18.1 50% | 8 78% | 13.9 61% | 9.5 74% | 18.6 48% |
| Idle Maximum * | 47 | 16.9 64% | 18.5 61% | 8.7 81% | 14.6 69% | 28.4 40% | 20 57% |
| Load Average * | 147.1 | 111.7 24% | 112.8 23% | 48.3 67% | 95 35% | 139.1 5% | 132.4 10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 158.8 | 152.1 4% | 106.7 33% | 45.3 71% | 98.9 38% | 134 16% | 232 -46% |
| Load Maximum * | 311 | 177.4 43% | 186 40% | 94.7 70% | 170.8 45% | 220.8 29% | 281.6 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø158.8 (156.7-162.6)
Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø134 (130.6-149.8)
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø192.6 (135.4-311)
Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø174.9 (114.6-220)
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø20.1 (15.1-33.7)
Power Consumption external Monitor
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø128.7 (89.5-222)
Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø132.7 (114.4-221)
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø198.5 (155.2-230)
Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø185.9 (158-216)
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø144.6 (141-153.1)
Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø132.4 (128.7-137.7)
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø159.8 (157.1-174.6)
Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø133.7 (130.8-137)
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.3 (14.7-28.7)
电池寿命
这次的电池容量略大，为93Wh，而更薄的Precision 7670则为83Wh。尽管如此，由于内部功能更强大，WLAN运行时间在我们的性能模型上缩短了近一个小时。
从空电到满电的充电时间仍然很慢，约为2.5小时。
| Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, 93 Wh | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA i7-1265U, T550 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Dell Precision 7670 i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 24% | 35% | 178% | 89% | 27% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 280 | 348 24% | 377 35% | 779 178% | 529 89% | 355 27% |
| H.264 | 509 | 1104 | ||||
| Load | 63 | 118 | 75 | |||
| Reader / Idle | 472 |
Pros
+ 支持多达3倍的M.2 2280固态硬盘
+ Nvidia RTX A5500 GPU选项
+ 合理的风扇噪音水平
+ 93瓦的大电池
+ 易维修性
Cons
- CPU Turbo Boost的可持续性可以做得更好
- OLED在所有亮度下都会闪烁
- CPU温度很高
- DPC延时问题
- 大而重
判决书
Precision 7670性能只是比标准的 7670稍微厚一些，重一些。 标准Precision 7670，但如果配置了最高的处理器选项，它的CPU和GPU性能分别比标准型号快大约10%和80%。如果你不打算特别利用GPU的优势，那么没有什么理由拥有性能型而不是标准型，因为其他优势相对较小。
Precision 7670性能在涉及到高端处理器选项和功能时提供了。尽管如此，有限的Turbo Boost潜力、高核心温度和DPC延迟问题还是让人有些失望。
在整体性能方面有很大的改进空间。尽管是较厚的性能型号，但核心温度并不比标准型号的好。因此，CPU Turbo Boost持续的时间比预期的要短得多，目标发烧友可能不喜欢。高DPC延迟、不均匀的WiFi性能、高空闲功耗和尺寸不足的AC适配器是其他问题，在这样的专业工作站上根本不应该发生。
价格和可用性
戴尔现在正在发货Precision 7670性能的基本配置起价为5300美元，当配置了与我们的测试设备相同的CPU和GPU时，价格超过7000美元。
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance
- 12/03/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Workstation - Weighted Average
Price comparison
