惠普ZBook Studio 16 G9笔记本电脑评测。配备120赫兹DreamColor显示屏的工作站

Name: HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
Brand: HP

Nvidia RTX A2000和Alder Lake i7。

对于第九代ZBook Studio移动工作站，惠普在16:10的外形尺寸中使用了更大的16英寸显示屏，DreamColor屏幕现在以120赫兹运行。酷睿i7-12800H和专业的Nvidia RTX A2000提供足够的性能。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/14/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Business Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows Workstation

惠普的ZBook Studio是一款高质量和超薄的移动工作站，与诸如以下机型直接竞争。戴尔Precision 5560或联想ThinkPad P1。虽然它确实拥有强大的组件，但与惠普更庞大的ZBook Fury系列相比，它对移动性的关注更多。 ZBook Fury系列.

新的ZBook Studio 16 G9提供了几个主要的升级，因为惠普已经从旧的G8模型的15.6英寸显示屏（16:9）切换到16:10外形尺寸的新的16英寸面板，并伴随着一个全新的外壳。提供了广泛的配置，特别是在显卡方面。我们的~3300美元的昂贵评测设备装备良好，因为目前的酷睿i7-12800H处理器由32GB内存和1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD支持。一块120赫兹的4K DreamColor面板也开始发挥作用，而苛刻的图形处理则由专业的 Nvidia RTX A2000(可与 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti).

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA (ZBook Studio Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-12800H 14 x 1.8 - 4.8 GHz, 88 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1335 MHz, RAM: 1375 MHz, 50 W TDP ( including 5 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 517.13, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, LPDDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 64 GB

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, BOE0A52, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, 1024 GB

, 880 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 356 x 242

Battery

86 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: 720p + IR
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Quad Speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200W PSU, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

1.827 kg, Power Supply: 613 g

Price

3300 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
90.1 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	19 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	17.7 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
92.5 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2021	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU	2.2 kg	16.8 mm	16.20"	3456x2234
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2021	Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	2 kg	18 mm	15.60"	3840x2400
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2021	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	18 mm	15.60"	3840x2160

外壳 - ZBook的铝制外壳

尽管不是很明显，但惠普为新的ZBook Studio 16 G9使用了一个全新的外壳。背面的边缘仍然是有棱有角的，但外壳的其余部分现在更圆一些。与普通EliteBook机型（银色）相比，该机型采用了更深的灰色，这在下面的对比图中可以清楚地看到。只要你打开屏幕面板，你就会立即注意到狭窄的屏幕边缘，这看起来非常现代。

从质量上看，这个金属外壳无可指责，因为基本单元和相对较薄的屏幕盖子都非常稳定。因此，我们无法引出任何吱吱作响的声音或图像错误。屏幕的铰链也调整得非常好，在改变打开角度时，只有极少的摇晃，其最大角度约为150度。

与老款相比ZBook Studio 15 G8相比，新的16英寸机型变得略微更深，略微更宽。另一方面，新的ZBook是最轻的机型之一，在这种配置下略高于1.8公斤。200瓦的电源适配器又增加了613克。

尺寸比较

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Dell Precision 5000 5560 DIN A4 ❌

装备--2个霹雳火4

端口有一些小变化，因为DisplayPort不得不为另一个USB-C端口让路。与上一代产品相比，布局也有变化。前代产品ZBook不能通过USB-C充电的事实让人恼火。

左边：电源，2个USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4（40 GBit/s，DisplayPort-ALT 1.4），3.5毫米立体声。

右边：microSD读卡器，USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（10 GBit/s，DisplayPort-ALT 1.4），USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 GBit/s），Kensington锁

SD卡阅读器

惠普已将录音室15 G8的全面的SD读卡器换成了一个完全接受microSD卡的读卡器。读卡器有一个弹簧机制，取出插入的卡可能有点麻烦。就速度而言，读卡器仍处于同一水平，约为80MB/s，但竞争对手更快。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	207 MB/s +184%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H (AV Pro V60)	196.9 MB/s +170%
Average of class Workstation (49.6 - 200, n=14, last 2 years)	92 MB/s +26%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H (AV Pro V60)	73.8 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H (Angelbird AV PRO V60)	72.9 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H (AV Pro V60)	198.4 MB/s +149%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	188 MB/s +136%
Average of class Workstation (81.2 - 227, n=14, last 2 years)	117.7 MB/s +48%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H (AV Pro V60)	88.6 MB/s +11%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H (Angelbird AV PRO V60)	79.6 MB/s

沟通

英特尔的现代AX211模块支持当前的Wi-Fi 6E标准，我们能够毫无问题地连接到华硕的参考路由器的6GHz网络。传输速率非常好，没有发现信号质量的问题。ZBook Studio 16 G9中没有WWAN模块（LTE或5G）。

Networking
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1646 (min: 1567) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1622 (min: 1552) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 receive AX12	1361 (min: 1205) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AX12	1506 (min: 796) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 receive AX12	1382 (min: 1340) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AX12	981 (min: 864) MBit/s ∼65%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 receive AXE11000	874 (min: 522) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	766 (min: 698) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	760 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AX12	772 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼51%

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1622 (1552-1659)

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1646 (1567-1666)

网络摄像头

关于网络摄像头，新的ZBook Studio令人失望，因为它只有一个720p的传感器供其使用。颜色还可以，但照片就是不怎么清晰和详细。

ColorChecker HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA: 6.75 ∆E min: 2.42 - max: 11.94 ∆E

维护

维护选项有了一些改善，因为惠普在Studio 16 G9中重新引入了SO-DIMM内存托架，这就是为什么现在可以再次升级内存。这也适用于M.2-2280固态硬盘，而且风扇也可以清洗。然而，WLAN模块是焊接在主板上的。根据规格表，带有Vapor-Chamber冷却装置的型号也应该有两个SODIMM插槽。

访问组件是非常困难的，因为一个机箱螺丝位于后部橡胶脚的下面。在中间，橡胶脚可以用一点压力取下，但材料非常硬，很快就会发生变形。这个小部件不太可能在几次拆卸中毫发无损。

输入设备 - 更小、更弱的键盘

键盘

与旧款相比，惠普现在在右侧安装了一个更紧凑的键盘，没有附加键。实际上，这里有足够的空间安装带有数字键盘的全键盘（比如在ZBook Firefly 16 G9)，但这个空间被用于扬声器。因此，这也意味着不再有专用的上一页和下一页功能键。总的来说，键盘已经更多地移向基本单元内的屏幕。

键盘有背光灯，而且是防水的，但机械结构并不完全令人信服。按键略显佝偻，总体上不像ZBook Firefly 16 G9（或相同结构的EliteBook 865 G9）那样好。与之相比前辈，它也是一个轻微的退步。

触摸板

几年前，惠普在ZBook Studio上取消了PointStick和专用的鼠标按钮，现在采用了一个大的ClickPad，它比旧款还要大，有13.4 x 8.9厘米。ClickPad得分很高：操作无误，滑行性能很好，而且Pad产生了一种消音但高质量的点击声。

显示器 - 4K梦幻色彩，120赫兹

惠普现在使用更大的16英寸显示屏，采用16:10格式，总共有四种不同的面板可供选择。

1,920 x 1,200像素，IPS，哑光，400尼特，低功率，100% sRGB。
1,920 x 1,200像素，IPS，亚光，1,000尼特，SureView隐私过滤器，72% NTSC
3,840 x 2,400像素，IPS，哑光，500尼特，DreamColor，120赫兹，100% DCI-P3
3.840 x 2.400像素，OLED，400尼特，康宁大猩猩玻璃5，100% DCI-P3

我们的评测设备配备的是4K DreamColor面板，它的主观画质非常好。哑光屏幕只有轻微的颗粒感，即使是在明亮的表面，但当坐在正常距离时，这一点并不明显。同时，内容非常清晰，色彩非常鲜艳。我们确定的平均亮度为良好的cd/m²，但0.47的黑值非常高，这导致 "只有"~1,200:1的体面的对比度。

120赫兹的较高频率在实践中也很明显，因为屏幕移动非常流畅，特别是在滚动浏览文件或网站时，对于IPS面板来说，响应时间也非常快。PWM闪烁不存在，可视角度的稳定性非常好，没有恼人的光晕。


551 cd/m²	531 cd/m²	537 cd/m²
486 cd/m²	554 cd/m²	525 cd/m²
465 cd/m²	497 cd/m²	502 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0A52 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 554 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 516.4 cd/m² Minimum: 26.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 553 cd/m²
Contrast: 1179:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA BOE0A52, IPS, 3840x2400, 16"	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NE160QDM-N63, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"	Dell Precision 5000 5560 Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6"	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 SDC4145, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Display		-13%		4%	4%
Display P3 Coverage	97.5	72.7 -25%		94.9 -3%	99.9 2%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	99.3 -1%		100 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	86.3	74.7 -13%		100 16%	95.3 10%
Response Times		-204%		-303%	73%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	15.3 ?(6.9, 8.4)	40.8 -167%		47.2 ?(25.2, 22) -208%	2.4 ?(1, 1.4) 84%
Response Time Black / White *	6.1 ?(2.1, 4)	20.8 -241%		30.4 ?(16.4, 14) -398%	2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3) 61%
PWM Frequency					240.4 ?(52)
Screen		-60%	256%	-83%	-166%
Brightness middle	554	441 -20%	507 -8%	501.5 -9%	379.6 -31%
Brightness	516	420 -19%	494 -4%	467 -9%	380 -26%
Brightness Distribution	84	90 7%	96 14%	83 -1%	95 13%
Black Level *	0.47	0.27 43%	0.02 96%	0.44 6%
Contrast	1179	1633 39%	25350 2050%	1140 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1	2.6 -160%	1.4 -40%	4.73 -373%	5.15 -415%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.4	6 -150%	2.8 -17%	8.45 -252%	7.79 -225%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.6	1.2 -100%		0.51 15%	3.1 -417%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	4.5 -181%	2.3 -44%	3.6 -125%	2.6 -63%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	2.18 ^101%	2.27 ^97%	2.08 ^106%	1.99 ^111%
CCT	6458 ^101%	6623 ^98%	6792 ^96%	6447 ^101%	6166 ^105%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-92% / -71%	256% / 256%	-127% / -96%	-30% / -84%

* ... smaller is better

DreamColor显示器已经很好地调整了工作状态。在我们用专业的CalMAN软件进行的分析中，所有的偏差都已经在3的重要限制之下，而且没有偏色。我们能够通过自己的校准从面板中挤出更多一点，但这种差异只是可测量的，而不是可感知的。

然而，我们仍然不完全满意，因为与早期的DreamColor型号相比，只有DCI-P3色彩空间在一段时间内得到了完全覆盖，而这曾经是AdobeRGB。此外，以前有DreamColor软件可以用来切换色彩空间，比如说可以在sRGB色彩空间中工作。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.1 ms rise
6.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.9 ms rise
15.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在户外，你可以用ZBook Studio 16 G9舒适地工作。由于哑光的表面和良好的亮度，即使在明亮的日子里，屏幕内容也很容易看到。只能避免光源的直接反射。

性能 - Alder Lake和大量的GPU

惠普提供了ZBook Studio 16 G9，其中包括酷睿i7-12800H或酷睿i9-12900H两者都来自英特尔目前的Alder Lake一代，支持vPro。然而，在显卡选择方面，你可以选择Nvidia的整个专业GPU组合，从 RTX A1000到 RTX A5500也有专业的AMD Radeon Pro 6600M。如果你不需要任何特殊的驱动认证，惠普仍然提供最新的GeForce GPU (RTX 3060至 RTX 3080 Ti)。 ZBook还提供两个SODIMM插槽（DDR5-4800 RAM），最大容量为64GB（2x 32GB）。

处理器 - 酷睿i7-12800H

芯片酷睿i7-12800H结合了6个快速性能核心和8个效率核心。原则上，这对应于普通的酷睿i7-12700H但实现了最低限度的更高的涡轮频率，也支持英特尔的vPro技术。ZBook Studio 16 G9的性能值非常好，因为该处理器能够消耗最大的88瓦，在持续负载下达到70瓦的水平。在我们的Cinebench R15循环中，该处理器恢复得非常快，而且还能很好地利用高涡轮增压时钟。单核结果也很好。把所有的CPU基准测试放在一起，新机型比之前的机型快30%。 ZBook Studio 15 G8配备的酷睿i9-11950H.

在电池供电的情况下，该处理器最多可消耗60瓦，这就是为什么多核性能略低（-18%）。这里有更多的CPU基准测试。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2518 (2462.45-2642.53)

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1876 (1827.4-2112.04)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1687 (1667.29-1693.05)

Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H: Ø1525 (1468.05-1546.97)

HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1806 (1765.46-1841.11)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Workstation	82.7 pt
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	80.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12800H	73.6 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max ^-5! Apple M1 Max	67.6 pt
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	61.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	61.4 pt
Dell Precision 5000 5560 ^-2! Intel Core i7-11850H	53.2 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Workstation (11026 - 30783, n=30, last 2 years)	18161 Points +9%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	16597 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (9777 - 16597, n=5)	14387 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	12385 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	12382 Points -25%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	12166 (11410^min - 12166.4^max) Points -27%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	9779 (9273.99^min - 9779.26^max) Points -41%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	1859 Points
Average of class Workstation (1469 - 2178, n=30, last 2 years)	1843 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1796 - 1859, n=5)	1824 Points -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1569 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1530 Points -18%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	1513 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	1510 Points -19%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Workstation (2990 - 11924, n=31, last 2 years)	6857 Points +7%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	6433 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (3741 - 6433, n=5)	5443 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	4776 Points -26%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	4660 Points -28%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	3826 Points -41%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	2735 Points -57%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	714 Points
Average of class Workstation (564 - 827, n=31, last 2 years)	705 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (690 - 714, n=5)	703 Points -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	610 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	585 Points -18%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	583 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	390 Points -45%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (1863 - 5224, n=30, last 2 years)	2854 Points +13%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	2518 (2462.45^min, 2463.98^P1 - 2642.53^max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1566 - 2697, n=5)	2236 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	2112 (1827.4^min - 2112.04^max) Points -16%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1841 (1765.46^min - 1841.11^max) Points -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1693 (1667^min - 1693^max) Points -33%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	1547 (1468.05^min - 1546.97^max) Points -39%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	269 Points
Average of class Workstation (166.2 - 301, n=30, last 2 years)	266 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (242 - 269, n=5)	260 Points -3%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	236 Points -12%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	232 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	231 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	197 Points -27%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	313 Seconds * -63%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	254 Seconds * -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	250 Seconds * -30%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (192 - 306, n=5)	233 Seconds * -21%
Average of class Workstation (100 - 295, n=30, last 2 years)	197 Seconds * -3%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	192 Seconds *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	189 Seconds * +2%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Workstation (47244 - 130368, n=30, last 2 years)	72718 MIPS +5%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	68930 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (44553 - 68930, n=5)	59950 MIPS -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	50077 MIPS -27%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	50050 MIPS -27%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	44890 MIPS -35%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Workstation (4981 - 7337, n=30, last 2 years)	6100 MIPS +2%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	5976 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (5726 - 5976, n=5)	5835 MIPS -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	5773 MIPS -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	5727 MIPS -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	5596 MIPS -6%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Workstation (8050 - 19514, n=30, last 2 years)	13271 Points +3%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	12940 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	12708 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (9607 - 12940, n=5)	11957 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	8272 Points -36%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	7286 Points -44%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Workstation (1474 - 2095, n=30, last 2 years)	1864 Points +1%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	1838 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1739 - 1842, n=5)	1790 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1782 Points -3%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1702 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	1572 Points -14%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Workstation (12.7 - 34.3, n=30, last 2 years)	20 fps +3%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	19.4 fps
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (11.7 - 19.4, n=5)	16.3 fps -16%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	14.5 fps -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	14.2 fps -27%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	12.6 fps -35%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	50.2 s * -16%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	48.6 s * -12%
Average of class Workstation (36.5 - 95.2, n=30, last 2 years)	48.3 s * -11%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	48 s * -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (41.3 - 51.5, n=5)	45.1 s * -4%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	43.4 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H	0.559 sec * -26%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	0.551 sec * -24%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	0.543 sec * -22%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (0.4442 - 0.4715, n=5)	0.4562 sec * -3%
Average of class Workstation (0.3825 - 0.54, n=30, last 2 years)	0.4482 sec * -1%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4442 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

315 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

269 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2518 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6433 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

714 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1859 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16597 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Workstation	99.2 pt
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	87 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	78.3 pt
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	77.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12800H	66.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Workstation (10658 - 50388, n=30, last 2 years)	19162 KRay/s +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	15248 KRay/s 0%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	15206 KRay/s
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	14407 KRay/s -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (5839 - 15206, n=5)	8773 KRay/s -42%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Workstation (56664 - 201874, n=30, last 2 years)	93170 Points +16%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	80002 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	63515 Points -21%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	60286 Points -25%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (27801 - 80002, n=5)	43634 Points -45%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	4217 MB/s +14%
Average of class Workstation (2598 - 8623, n=30, last 2 years)	4158 MB/s +13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	4003 MB/s +9%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	3684 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (2013 - 3684, n=5)	2749 MB/s -25%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Workstation (84022 - 181505, n=30, last 2 years)	109324 Points +1%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	108084 Points
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	98772 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (85965 - 108084, n=5)	96746 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	91827 Points -15%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Workstation (7906 - 28794, n=30, last 2 years)	12287 Points +27%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	9828 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	9783 Points +1%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	9658 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (7027 - 9658, n=5)	8839 Points -8%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Workstation (27301 - 105740, n=30, last 2 years)	47026 Points +23%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	38179 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	37783 Points -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	35735 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (15765 - 38179, n=5)	23653 Points -38%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	88402 MB/s +20%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	84048 MB/s +14%
Average of class Workstation (45568 - 128243, n=30, last 2 years)	82818 MB/s +12%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	73928 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (55371 - 73928, n=5)	61463 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Workstation (713 - 2022, n=30, last 2 years)	1125 MB/s +7%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	1047 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (701 - 1047, n=5)	926 MB/s -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	804 MB/s -23%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	767 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Workstation (5580 - 26875, n=30, last 2 years)	10193 KRay/s +19%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	8559 KRay/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	8170 KRay/s -5%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	7871 KRay/s -8%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (3257 - 8559, n=5)	4904 KRay/s -43%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Workstation (18157 - 51686, n=30, last 2 years)	39308 MPixel/s +2%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	38574 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (31329 - 40992, n=5)	38291 MPixel/s -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	22621 MPixel/s -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	15524 MPixel/s -60%

系统性能

ZBook Studio 16 G9是一个非常强大和反应迅速的设备，这也被良好的基准测试结果所证实。在测试中没有发现任何问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Workstation (5953 - 8587, n=30, last 2 years)	7294 Points +15%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	6751 Points +7%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6676 Points +6%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6321 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	6321 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6147 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Workstation (9151 - 12197, n=30, last 2 years)	10627 Points +13%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10596 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9956 Points +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	9915 Points +5%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9431 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	9431 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Workstation (7846 - 10820, n=30, last 2 years)	9466 Points +20%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9005 Points +14%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	8461 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	8353 Points +6%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7889 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	7889 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Workstation (7417 - 15093, n=30, last 2 years)	10578 Points +15%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	9952 Points +8%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9212 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	9212 Points 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8463 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	7581 Points -18%

CrossMark / Overall
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1843 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	1843 Points 0%
Average of class Workstation (1154 - 2044, n=28, last 2 years)	1766 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1586 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1526 Points -17%

CrossMark / Productivity
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1723 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	1723 Points 0%
Average of class Workstation (1188 - 1909, n=28, last 2 years)	1681 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1521 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1361 Points -21%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	2102 Points +1%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2091 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	2091 Points 0%
Average of class Workstation (1180 - 2335, n=28, last 2 years)	1971 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1606 Points -23%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1545 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	1545 Points 0%
Average of class Workstation (990 - 1805, n=28, last 2 years)	1478 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1323 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1080 Points -30%

PCMark 10 Score		6321 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Workstation (30324 - 95718, n=30, last 2 years)	63278 MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	61978 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (48643 - 62522, n=5)	59483 MB/s -4%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	44239 MB/s -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	39344 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	65470 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (56629 - 66199, n=5)	63902 MB/s -2%
Average of class Workstation (30787 - 86584, n=30, last 2 years)	61530 MB/s -6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	47921 MB/s -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	40872 MB/s -38%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Workstation (32728 - 93871, n=30, last 2 years)	67146 MB/s +4%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	64424 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (50923 - 66074, n=5)	62637 MB/s -3%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	46818 MB/s -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	40723 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Workstation (83.4 - 140.8, n=30, last 2 years)	104.6 ns * -17%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	89.3 ns *
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU	83.8 ns * +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	82.6 ns * +8%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (89.3 - 95.2, n=5)	36.9 (89.3^min - 95.2^max) ns * +59%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们评测设备中的当前BIOS版本在我们的标准化延迟测试中显示出轻微的局限性（网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载），因此并非最适合实时音频应用。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	1508 μs * -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1419 μs * -25%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1136.6 μs *
Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	759 μs * +33%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

惠普使用快速的PCIe 4.0 Micron 3400固态硬盘，存储容量为1TB（首次启动后可用880GB）。传输速率非常高，即使在永久性负载下，几分钟后也只有极小的性能下降，但这在实践中并不重要。更多的SSD基准测试可在这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6325.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4971.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 466.84 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 413.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63.83 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 150.51 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 438.39 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1019.37 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	86.6 pt
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	79.9 pt
Average of class Workstation	78.9 pt
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	75.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	73.9 pt
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	50.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Workstation (888 - 5715, n=30, last 2 years)	3526 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3491 (3384.54^min - 3491.28^max) MB/s
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3402 (3327.13^min - 3402.21^max) MB/s -3%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1306 - 4343, n=23)	3283 MB/s -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3198 (2801.23^min - 3198.05^max) MB/s -8%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	2222 (2190.89^min - 2222.39^max) MB/s -36%
seq write
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2416 - 4954, n=23)	3856 MB/s +19%
Average of class Workstation (848 - 7289, n=30, last 2 years)	3580 MB/s +10%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3248 (2832.2^min - 3247.86^max) MB/s
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2950 (2919.03^min - 2949.85^max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2767 (2739.3^min - 2767.11^max) MB/s -15%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	1994 (1956.99^min - 1994.39^max) MB/s -39%
seq q8 t1 read
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7036 (6609.8^min - 7035.53^max) MB/s +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6742 (5587.44^min - 6742.34^max) MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6607 (6240.5^min - 6607.08^max) MB/s
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (6207 - 6734, n=23)	6571 MB/s -1%
Average of class Workstation (944 - 12631, n=30, last 2 years)	6451 MB/s -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	3546 (2637.17^min - 3546.07^max) MB/s -46%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Workstation (867 - 9890, n=30, last 2 years)	5270 MB/s +16%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5109 (5060.79^min - 5108.66^max) MB/s +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4844 (4829.73^min - 4844.04^max) MB/s +7%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (4259 - 4991, n=23)	4807 MB/s +6%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4543 (4312.16^min - 4542.64^max) MB/s
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	3056 (2938.74^min - 3056.18^max) MB/s -33%
4k q1 t1 read
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	80.8 (80.46^min - 80.76^max) MB/s +64%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	66.8 (66.72^min - 66.78^max) MB/s +35%
Average of class Workstation (52.4 - 99, n=30, last 2 years)	65.7 MB/s +33%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (39.2 - 74.3, n=23)	59.4 MB/s +20%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	49.4 (46.05^min - 49.39^max) MB/s
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	39.7 (39.25^min - 39.67^max) MB/s -20%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (125.8 - 273, n=23)	189.4 MB/s +24%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	183 (182.04^min - 183.17^max) MB/s +20%
Average of class Workstation (106.8 - 316, n=30, last 2 years)	158 MB/s +3%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	153 (151.36^min - 152.95^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	140 (139.56^min - 139.91^max) MB/s -8%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	111 (110.67^min - 111.48^max) MB/s -27%
4k q32 t16 read
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (636 - 2868, n=23)	2075 MB/s +126%
Average of class Workstation (561 - 4926, n=30, last 2 years)	1485 MB/s +61%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	955 (945.81^min - 954.64^max) MB/s +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	934 (920.06^min - 933.51^max) MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	920 (850.96^min - 920.44^max) MB/s
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	756 (747.7^min - 756.38^max) MB/s -18%
4k q32 t16 write
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (328 - 2786, n=23)	1765 MB/s +315%
Average of class Workstation (361 - 3579, n=30, last 2 years)	960 MB/s +126%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	425 (417.87^min - 425.06^max) MB/s
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	422 (415.41^min - 421.56^max) MB/s -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	388 (383.05^min - 388.19^max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	291 (285.97^min - 290.61^max) MB/s -32%

AS SSD
Score Total
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (3998 - 7575, n=21)	6303 Points +16%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5753 Points +6%
Average of class Workstation (2419 - 10591, n=30, last 2 years)	5599 Points +3%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	5422 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5398 Points 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	4297 Points -21%
Score Read
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1123 - 2855, n=21)	2259 Points +52%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1827 Points +23%
Average of class Workstation (962 - 3807, n=30, last 2 years)	1723 Points +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1534 Points +3%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1490 Points
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	1404 Points -6%
Score Write
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3258 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3177 Points -2%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3133 Points -4%
Average of class Workstation (742 - 4852, n=30, last 2 years)	3081 Points -5%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2373 - 3304, n=21)	2942 Points -10%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	2232 Points -31%
Seq Read
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5169 MB/s +7%
Average of class Workstation (837 - 7437, n=30, last 2 years)	5029 MB/s +4%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4845 MB/s
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (2201 - 5348, n=21)	4468 MB/s -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4112 MB/s -15%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	2953 MB/s -39%
Seq Write
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1876 - 4539, n=21)	3311 MB/s +17%
Average of class Workstation (778 - 5882, n=30, last 2 years)	3032 MB/s +7%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2831 MB/s
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1986 MB/s -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1785 MB/s -37%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	1691 MB/s -40%
4K Read
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	78 MB/s +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	72.2 MB/s +21%
Average of class Workstation (46.6 - 90.9, n=30, last 2 years)	62 MB/s +4%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	59.57 MB/s
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (40.6 - 67.7, n=21)	58.6 MB/s -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	43.98 MB/s -26%
4K Write
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	214.6 MB/s +28%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (97.9 - 242, n=21)	177.9 MB/s +6%
Average of class Workstation (98.6 - 262, n=30, last 2 years)	175.5 MB/s +4%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	168.04 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	164 MB/s -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	105.4 MB/s -37%
4K-64 Read
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (603 - 2264, n=21)	1754 MB/s +85%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1232 MB/s +30%
Average of class Workstation (649 - 3182, n=30, last 2 years)	1162 MB/s +23%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	1065 MB/s +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1050 MB/s +11%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	945.86 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2835 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2807.07 MB/s
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2719 MB/s -3%
Average of class Workstation (431 - 4090, n=30, last 2 years)	2603 MB/s -7%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (1959 - 2807, n=21)	2433 MB/s -13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	1957 MB/s -30%
Access Time Read
Average of class Workstation (0.017 - 0.105, n=30, last 2 years)	0.0514 ms * -90%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (0.023 - 0.089, n=20)	0.04675 ms * -73%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	0.04 ms * -48%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.028 ms * -4%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.027 ms *
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.024 ms * +11%
Access Time Write
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	0.105 ms * -357%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.059 ms * -157%
Average of class Workstation (0.015 - 0.092, n=30, last 2 years)	0.04593 ms * -100%
Average Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH (0.019 - 0.092, n=21)	0.0369 ms * -60%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.024 ms * -4%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.023 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA: Ø6517 (6159.96-6615.87)

显卡 - Nvidia RTX A2000

的英伟达RTX A2000是一款基于GA107芯片的专业GPU，与 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti。尽管名称相同，但RTX A2000在今年得到了升级：它现在不再是4GB GDDR6 VRAM，而是8GB VRAM，速度略高。

惠普使用45瓦的RTX A2000版本，其中有额外的5瓦可供处理器使用。这使得它成为较慢的版本之一，在我们的数据库中这种GPU的平均得分也略高。就原始性能而言，ZBook Studio 16 G9中的RTX A2000大致上可以与M1-Pro-GPU中的 MacBook Pro 16.

而 RTX 3070的RTX 3070在原始性能方面当然更胜一筹，但在专业测试中，由于有专业驱动程序，RTX A2000偶尔会有明显的优势。此外，RTX A2000的性能在永久负载下保持完全稳定，这在3DMark压力测试以及我们的Witcher 3 循环中都很明显。ZBook也可以进行游戏；根据标题的不同，它经常为全高清的高细节提供足够的动力。

在电池供电的情况下，GPU的功耗被限制在35瓦，这相当于20%左右的赤字。更多的GPU基准测试被列在我们的技术部分.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Workstation	97.6 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max ^-21! Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max	81.6 pt
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 ^-11! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	68.5 pt
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	66.8 pt
Dell Precision 5000 5560 ^-3! NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	64 pt
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	63.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS ^-1! NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	50.2 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro ^-21! Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	45.4 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Workstation (9356 - 59715, n=31, last 2 years)	29156 Points +61%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	28908 Points +60%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	18058 Points
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (14831 - 19823, n=9)	17690 Points -2%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	16236 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	14387 Points -20%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	21399 Points +63%
Average of class Workstation (6121 - 45600, n=31, last 2 years)	20659 Points +57%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (10415 - 15988, n=9)	13167 Points 0%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	13157 Points
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	11970 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	10134 Points -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Workstation (1997 - 19741, n=31, last 2 years)	8309 Points +66%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	7909 Points +58%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (4228 - 6108, n=9)	5151 Points +3%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	5016 Points
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	4616 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	3595 Points -28%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max	20228 Points +104%
Average of class Workstation (8439 - 15840, n=4, last 2 years)	10918 Points +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	10352 Points +5%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	9895 Points
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (9041 - 9895, n=2)	9468 Points -4%

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average of class Workstation (91.8 - 230, n=25, last 2 years)	169.8 fps +40%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (121.3 - 177, n=9)	144.6 fps +19%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	140.8 fps +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	128.5 fps +6%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	121.26 fps
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	92.3 fps -24%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Average of class Workstation (48.9 - 555, n=25, last 2 years)	301 fps +58%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (135.2 - 223, n=9)	191 fps 0%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	190.69 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	176.3 fps -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	161.3 fps -15%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	18.89 fps -90%
Showcase (showcase-02)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	100.3 fps +49%
Average of class Workstation (28.6 - 190.3, n=25, last 2 years)	94.5 fps +40%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (58.8 - 79.2, n=9)	68 fps +1%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	67.42 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	63 fps -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	46.84 fps -31%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Workstation (37.3 - 272, n=25, last 2 years)	129.5 fps +87%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (54.7 - 78.3, n=9)	70.4 fps +2%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	69.14 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	66.6 fps -4%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	56.8 fps -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	53.6 fps -22%
Maya (maya-05)
Average of class Workstation (103 - 449, n=25, last 2 years)	267 fps +69%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	200.8 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (117.2 - 221, n=9)	174.5 fps +11%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	162 fps +3%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	157.65 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	127.8 fps -19%
Energy (energy-02)
Average of class Workstation (2.77 - 109.7, n=25, last 2 years)	52 fps +55%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	33.46 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (23.9 - 36.8, n=9)	32.1 fps -4%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	29.09 fps -13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	21.17 fps -37%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	19.29 fps -42%
Creo (creo-02)
Average of class Workstation (76.8 - 425, n=25, last 2 years)	247 fps +66%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (117.1 - 207, n=8)	165.1 fps +11%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	161.4 fps +8%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	156.8 fps +5%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	149 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	132.9 fps -11%
Catia (catia-05)
Average of class Workstation (99.5 - 418, n=25, last 2 years)	272 fps +46%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (159.1 - 251, n=9)	205 fps +10%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	186.1 fps 0%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	185.92 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	169.4 fps -9%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	127.9 fps -31%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Average of class Workstation (80.8 - 288, n=25, last 2 years)	184.4 fps +52%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	177.3 fps +47%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (120.5 - 165, n=9)	139.4 fps +15%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	135.1 fps +12%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	120.96 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	105.4 fps -13%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Workstation (50.6 - 347, n=21, last 2 years)	171 fps +49%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (106.3 - 142.3, n=9)	124.3 fps +9%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	114.52 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	114.3 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	91.2 fps -20%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Workstation (22.3 - 554, n=29, last 2 years)	268 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (136.9 - 222, n=9)	190.4 fps +6%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	179.08 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	175.1 fps -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	164.1 fps -8%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Workstation (15.6 - 152, n=29, last 2 years)	62 fps +95%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	33.98 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (27 - 38.4, n=9)	33.4 fps +5%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	31.84 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	24.85 fps -22%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Workstation (102 - 660, n=29, last 2 years)	302 fps +75%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (172.4 - 266, n=9)	208 fps +21%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	196.6 fps +14%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	172.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	144.9 fps -16%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Workstation (2.78 - 109.7, n=29, last 2 years)	47.4 fps +41%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	33.53 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (26.1 - 36.9, n=9)	32.4 fps -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	29.44 fps -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	19.3 fps -42%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Workstation (45.9 - 169.5, n=29, last 2 years)	107.7 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (65.5 - 117, n=9)	97.6 fps +4%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	93.92 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	91.5 fps -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	78.7 fps -16%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Workstation (21 - 131.4, n=29, last 2 years)	76.2 fps +32%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (46 - 67.9, n=9)	58 fps 0%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	57.81 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	53.5 fps -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	41.6 fps -28%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Workstation (28.5 - 208, n=29, last 2 years)	92.6 fps +48%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (54.4 - 72.9, n=9)	63.3 fps +1%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	62.64 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5560 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	59.6 fps -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	50.2 fps -20%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Average of class Workstation (62 - 1216, n=22, last 2 years)	428 mpaths +121%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (194 - 255, n=6)	217 mpaths +12%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	194 mpaths
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	81 mpaths -58%

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Average of class Workstation (4201 - 223905, n=30, last 2 years)	95636 Points +63%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (58687 - 72661, n=7)	66017 Points +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max	60482 Points +3%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	58687 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	42637 Points -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	37867 Points -35%

3DMark 11 Performance		18475 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		12211 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		5523 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-1265U	265 Seconds * -400%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16X OLED N7600PC-L2026X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H	58 Seconds * -9%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	53 Seconds * -0%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	53 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (42 - 54, n=7)	49.4 Seconds * +7%
Dell Precision 7670 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12850HX	42 Seconds * +21%
Average of class Workstation (13 - 95, n=26, last 2 years)	33.5 Seconds * +37%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	22 Seconds * +58%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-1265U	283 Seconds * -204%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16X OLED N7600PC-L2026X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H	110 Seconds * -18%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	93 Seconds *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	91 Seconds * +2%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (78 - 98, n=7)	87 Seconds * +6%
Dell Precision 7670 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12850HX	79 Seconds * +15%
Average of class Workstation (18 - 155, n=26, last 2 years)	60.7 Seconds * +35%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	36 Seconds * +61%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-1265U	1202 Seconds * -257%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16X OLED N7600PC-L2026X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H	783 Seconds * -132%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i5-1240P	552 Seconds * -64%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	456 Seconds * -35%
Dell Precision 7670 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12850HX	359 Seconds * -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	355 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (312 - 414, n=7)	351 Seconds * -4%
Average of class Workstation (160 - 483, n=31, last 2 years)	338 Seconds * -0%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	337 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Witcher 3 FPS chart

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU: Ø48.8 (46-52)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	185.7	181.1	146.3	72.1	51.8	44.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	282	188	103	48.8		33
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	181.5	166.9	157.4	149.4		72.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	141.7	78	56.4		41	23.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	138.8	119	97			76.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)	165	96	88	83	57	26
Strange Brigade (2018)	289	134	106	92	66	35
F1 2021 (2021)	290	166	138.5	68.4	48.3	25.7
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	69	59	44	37	23
F1 22 (2022)	155.4	147.8	111.6	33.6	20.7	9.76

排放 - 带有非常好的扬声器的Zbook

噪声

ZBook Studio 16 G9的两个风扇启动得很快，即使在低负载情况下也是如此，被动冷却系统的整体性能不是很好。甚至在打开网络浏览器时，风扇也启动了。在更高的负载下，风扇加速非常快：我们在综合负载下测量到45-48 dB(A)之间。有趣的是，在CPU原始负载为51 dB(A)的情况下，风扇的声音甚至有点大。没有检测到任何电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		24 / 27.7 / 27.7 dB(A)
Load		39.8 / 47.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
Noise		-1%	5%	13%	-1%
off / environment *	24	24.3 -1%	24.2 -1%	23.4 2%	23.5 2%
Idle Minimum *	24	24.3 -1%	24.2 -1%	23.6 2%	25.3 -5%
Idle Average *	27.7	24.3 12%	24.2 13%	23.6 15%	25.3 9%
Idle Maximum *	27.7	26.6 4%	24.2 13%	23.6 15%	25.3 9%
Load Average *	39.8	46.8 -18%	42.9 -8%	25.8 35%	41.2 -4%
Witcher 3 ultra *	44.3	46.8 -6%	39.5 11%	40.1 9%	49.4 -12%
Load Maximum *	47.7	46.8 2%	42.9 10%	41.4 13%	49.4 -4%

* ... smaller is better

温度

惠普将新的ZBook Studio 16 G9的表面温度控制得很好。在低负载情况下，机箱几乎没有发热，整个键盘区域保持着宜人的温度，即使在最大负载情况下，最高温度也只有不到36℃。它的底部变得有点热，你应该注意避免皮肤接触中间区域的热点（~53℃），但这里没有一般的限制。

在压力测试中，处理器最初的功率为35瓦，显卡的功率为45瓦。然而，这一比例在进一步的测试过程中发生了变化，处理器下降到30瓦，而GPU同时上升到50瓦。这证实了冷却系统能够保持总共约80瓦的永久冷却。不幸的是，我们不能对使用更强的显卡的配置做出任何声明（从 RTX A3000到 GeForce RTX 3060)，因为这里使用的是更强的Vapor-Chamber冷却。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


36.7 °C	38.7 °C	33.2 °C
38.5 °C	33.1 °C	29.2 °C
27.6 °C	28.1 °C	°C

Maximum: 38.7 °C
Average: 29.5 °C


45 °C	53.4 °C	47.3 °C
35.5 °C	46.7 °C	43 °C
28.1 °C	31.5 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 53.4 °C
Average: 39.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 52.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


26.9 °C	27.3 °C	26.9 °C
25.9 °C	26.6 °C	25.6 °C
24.8 °C	24.3 °C	24.7 °C

Maximum: 27.3 °C
Average: 25.9 °C


30.8 °C	31.6 °C	29.5 °C
26.2 °C	28.9 °C	28.8 °C
25.1 °C	25.8 °C	25.7 °C

Maximum: 31.6 °C
Average: 28 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


33.3 °C	34.8 °C	30.1 °C
31.6 °C	35.5 °C	29.6 °C
27.3 °C	26.3 °C	26.6 °C

Maximum: 35.5 °C
Average: 30.6 °C


44.5 °C	51.4 °C	45.4 °C
30.2 °C	43.4 °C	41.9 °C
27.3 °C	30.1 °C	28.4 °C

Maximum: 51.4 °C
Average: 38.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.4 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-0.3 °C / -0.6 F).

	HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU	Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Heat		-3%	12%	-11%	-5%
Maximum Upper Side *	38.7	49.9 -29%	42.3 -9%	48.2 -25%	49 -27%
Maximum Bottom *	53.4	56.7 -6%	41.7 22%	42.6 20%	54.2 -1%
Idle Upper Side *	27.3	25.5 7%	23.9 12%	34.8 -27%	26.2 4%
Idle Bottom *	31.6	26.2 17%	23.9 24%	35.2 -11%	30.2 4%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

如前所述，惠普现在将扬声器放在了键盘旁边，四个模块的性能非常好。声音非常丰满，而且产生了立体声效果。只有低音可以做一些改进，但这将被一些人认为是发散性的。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--DreamColor消耗了大量的电力

消耗功率

高分辨率的DreamColor面板需要大量的电力，空闲模式下近19瓦的测量结果证实了这一点。前代产品的4K OLED面板在这方面甚至更加饥饿。负载下没有出现异常情况。

我们测量了186瓦的最大峰值消耗，但这很快就在120瓦左右趋于平稳。因此，附带的200瓦电源是完全足够的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.23 / 0.26 Watt
Idle	7.2 / 18.1 / 18.5 Watt
Load	112.8 / 186 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3840x2400, 16"	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048R, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"	Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6"	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	Average of class Workstation
Power Consumption		6%	15%	12%	-25%	12%	7%
Idle Minimum *	7.2	9.9 -38%	5.4 25%	6.2 14%	11 -53%	6.6 ?(3.9 - 10.5, n=8) 8%	8.87 ?(2.6 - 31.3, n=30, last 2 years) -23%
Idle Average *	18.1	13.9 23%	16.4 9%	13.9 23%	18.8 -4%	11.8 ?(7.2 - 18.1, n=8) 35%	13.3 ?(4 - 38.3, n=30, last 2 years) 27%
Idle Maximum *	18.5	14.6 21%	16.7 10%	23.8 -29%	31.7 -71%	16.7 ?(8.5 - 28.4, n=8) 10%	18.6 ?(5.6 - 41.6, n=30, last 2 years) -1%
Load Average *	112.8	95 16%	94 17%	95.7 15%	105.2 7%	116.3 ?(82.8 - 182, n=8) -3%	92.8 ?(49.7 - 182, n=30, last 2 years) 18%
Witcher 3 ultra *	106.7	98.9 7%	104 3%	87 18%	148 -39%
Load Maximum *	186	170.8 8%	135 27%	132.6 29%	171.8 8%	171.3 ?(124.8 - 229, n=8) 8%	160.8 ?(60.2 - 301, n=30, last 2 years) 14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø106.7 (102.9-111.3)

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø122.8 (116.7-186.1)

Power consumption with an external monitor

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø112.6 (103.4-126.5)

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø139.5 (137.6-141.9)

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø51.4 (47.7-82.4)

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø118.8 (112.2-126.4)

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø79.4 (77.1-88)

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø98.5 (95.3-101.8)

电池寿命

尽管有86Wh的大电池，但电池寿命不是特别长。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，我们记录了4.5-6.5小时，取决于亮度。当然，这对于偶尔的会议来说是完全足够的，但对于在没有电源适配器的情况下完成一个完整的工作日来说是不够的。鉴于这些结果，ZBook Studio 16 G9因此在比较领域中排名靠后。如果你对ZBook Studio感兴趣，并且需要更长的电池寿命，你应该选择带有低功耗显示屏（400尼特）的配置。

设备开机后，电池充满需要2个小时；大约1个小时后就可以使用80%的容量。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 107)		6h 17min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 107)		4h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 03min

	HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Average of class Workstation
Battery Runtime		40%	79%	38%	33%	31%
H.264	509		1021 101%			671 ?(347 - 1067, n=8, last 2 years) 32%
WiFi v1.3	377	529 40%	894 137%	380 1%	369 -2%	500 ?(148 - 897, n=30, last 2 years) 33%
Load	63		63 0%	110 75%	106 68%	80.3 ?(55 - 114, n=16, last 2 years) 27%

Pros

+ 非常高质量和稳定的外壳

+ 良好的输入设备

+ 伟大的120赫兹梦幻色彩显示屏

+ 高的CPU和系统性能

+ 非常好的扩音器

+ 2个SODIMM

+ 霹雳4、Wi-Fi 6E和PCIe 4.0

Cons

- 部件难以接近

- 风扇启动很快

- 弱的720p网络摄像头

- 电池寿命相对较短

结论 - ZBook Studio G9是一个坚实的进步

在审查中。HP ZBook Studio 16 G9。样品设备由德国惠普公司提供。

新的ZBook Studio 16 G9在几个方面是一个坚实的提升。惠普的移动工作站笔记本电脑仍然保持着极高的质量，但现在采用新的16:10显示屏，看起来更加现代。此外，板上再次有两个SODIMM插槽，因此可以轻松升级RAM。这里唯一的问题是很难接触到组件。

两个主要组件的性能总体上是好的。酷睿i7处理器受益于高功率限制，Nvidia RTX A2000提供了稳定的性能，即使它是最多50瓦（TGP）的较慢版本之一。然而，传统的冷却方式在综合负载下达到了极限，这就是为什么惠普在具有更强GPU的型号中安装了蒸汽室冷却。120赫兹的DreamColor显示屏提供了非常好的主观画质，在测试中也以准确的色彩给人留下深刻印象，但也需要大量的电力。

惠普ZBook Studio 16 G9是一款高质量和强大的移动工作站，尽管它的外形尺寸为16英寸，但仍然相当灵活

传统上，ZBook Studio不提供专门的数字键盘，键盘旁边的空间被用于（非常好的）音响系统。然而，我们必须在这里提到，较便宜的 ZBook Firefly 16 G9(以及EliteBook 865 G9）的键盘要好一些，也提供数字键盘。另一个批评点，尽管是表面上的，是更昂贵的ZBook Studio 16 G93的打字感觉，它在这里的表现确实不应该差。你还应该记住，在日常使用中，风扇的启动速度也比较快。

我们还没有审查其他当前和竞争的移动工作站，但新的ZBook Studio 16 G9在许多方面都做得很好，总体上是一个非常坚实的包。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

建议有兴趣的买家直接通过惠普的笔记本在线商店（如适用）查询供货情况。每个地区提供不同的硬件（特别是面板）和规格。例如，，在美国的配置为从2,374.05美元一直到6,432.00美元不等。这也适用于其他国家，如UK,印度和澳大利亚.

价格截止到2022年11月13日，可能会有变化。

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA - 11/10/2022 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

91 / 98 → 93%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

98%

Connectivity

68 / 80 → 85%

Weight

65 / 10-66 → 98%

Battery

73 / 95 → 77%

Display

94%

Games Performance

92%

Application Performance

95%

Workstation

88%

Temperature

89 / 95 → 93%

Noise

84 / 90 → 94%

Audio

89%

Camera

30 / 85 → 35%

Average

82%

90%

Workstation - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1418 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普ZBook Studio 16 G9笔记本电脑评测。配备120赫兹DreamColor显示屏的工作站

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-11-14 (Update: 2022-11-14)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - ZBook的铝制外壳

尺寸比较

装备--2个霹雳火4

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - 更小、更弱的键盘

键盘

触摸板

显示器 - 4K梦幻色彩，120赫兹

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - Alder Lake和大量的GPU

处理器 - 酷睿i7-12800H

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC延时

存储设备

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

显卡 - Nvidia RTX A2000

Witcher 3 FPS chart

排放 - 带有非常好的扬声器的Zbook

噪声

温度

发言人

HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

电源管理--DreamColor消耗了大量的电力

消耗功率

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - ZBook Studio G9是一个坚实的进步

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison