惠普 OmniBook X AI 14 评测:适合日常使用的骁龙笔记本电脑,电池续航时间长,但显示屏较弱
不平衡。
惠普 OmniBook X AI 14 是一款小巧的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,搭载骁龙 X Elite 处理器,电池续航时间非常长。不过,惠普在一些关键领域偷工减料,令人瞠目结舌,影响了这款笔记本电脑的整体印象。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
评语:OmniBook X 值得拥有更好的显示屏
惠普推出的 OmniBook X AI 14 是一款轻薄的骁龙笔记本电脑,其 1100 美元的零售价给人留下了好坏参半的印象。虽然使用的是入门级骁龙 X Elite 处理器,但其性能完全可以满足大多数办公应用的需要。
不过,需要注意的是,这款笔记本的软件兼容性有限,因为并非所有程序都有相应的 ARM 版本,也并非所有 x86 应用程序都能有效模拟。因此,在购买之前,您一定要检查您所需的软件是否能在 ARM CPU 上运行,以避免不愉快的意外。
对于 OmniBook X AI 而言,更大的问题在于显示屏。惠普使用的是亮度略低于 300 cd/m² 的 IPS 面板。再加上高度反光的表面,在很多情况下这是远远不够的。
同时,60 Hz 的低刷新率和缓慢的响应时间也给主观的图像印象蒙上了一层阴影,造成了明显的重影。该面板唯一真正的优势是功耗低,这或许也是电池续航时间非常长的原因。
如果你能忍受显示屏的不尽如人意和 ARM 平台的局限性,OmniBook X AI 14 绝对值得考虑,尤其是考虑到它已经可以在网上以不到 1000 美元的价格买到。
如果能改进显示屏,或者至少提供一个配置选项,将有助于使该设备成为更好的整体解决方案。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP OmniBook X 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $891.24 HP OmniBook X Laptop 14.0" T... 2. $1,059.99 HP OmniBook X Home & Busines... 3. $1,199.49 HP OmniBook Ultra AI Powered... List Price: 1299€ | 1.3 kg | 14.3 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI IPS | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1200 EUR | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,199.49 List Price: 1030 USD | 1.5 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI IPS | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,199.99 List Price: 1400 EUR | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $997.97 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Copilot ... 2. $14.98 65W USB Type C Charger Fit f... 3. $45.37 Berfea Protective Case Cover... List Price: 1599€ | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.50" 2944x1840 239 PPI OLED | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... 2. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 3. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 1300 Euro | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $799.99 List Price: 1569€ | 1.2 kg | 10.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
惠普 OmniBook X 是一款轻薄的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,配备了高通公司的骁龙 X Elite 处理器。X1E-78-100 的零售价为 1,100 美元,不带双核涡轮增压、16 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 60 Hz 2.2K IPS 触摸屏。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
底盘和硬件印象不一
OmniBook X AI 14 是一款轻薄的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,有流星银(我们的型号)和陶瓷白两种颜色可供选择。它的设计简洁而美观,表面采用喷砂阳极氧化处理,不易沾染指纹。
它的厚度为 14.3 毫米,是我们所见过的最薄的机型之一,仅次于 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge要明显薄一些。我们对其稳定性并不完全满意,因为底座可以明显扭动,还伴有嘎吱嘎吱的声音。
盖子的稳定性还算不错,铰链也很紧,但仍有一些明显的晃动。盖子打开的最大角度约为 135°。底盖很容易拆卸,可以接触到风扇、M.2 2280 固态硬盘和 WLAN 模块。
板载硬件给人的印象好坏参半。两个 USB-C 端口中只有一个支持 USB 4.0 标准,但至少右侧还有一个普通的 USB-A 端口。
此外,惠普没有使用高通公司(Qualcomm)的 FastConnect 7800 Wi-Fi 7 模块。相反,惠普使用了低端的 FastConnect 6900 Wi-Fi 6E 模块。不过,实际传输速率还是不错的。
网络摄像头(包括机械光圈)为 500 万像素传感器,图像质量非常好。支持 Windows Studio 效果以及通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。
Networking | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
可持续性
OmniBook 的大部分包装由纸板制成。设备本身也使用了一些可回收材料:扬声器外壳和屏幕边框由可回收塑料制成,键帽和键盘开关含有可回收的家用塑料,上盖、键盘框架、底座和键盘支撑板使用了可回收金属。
该设备符合 EPEAT Gold Climate+ 标准,并通过了能源之星认证;生产过程中的二氧化碳排放量信息不详。
输入设备舒适的键盘
虽然背光键盘的键程较短,但敲击精确,整体打字感觉舒适。不过,按键的声音也比较大。
F 键和右上角的电源键颜色对比强烈。垂直方向键很小,没有专门的上/下键,背光也不能自动激活。
ClickPad 的运行没有任何问题,并且具有良好的滑动性能,但下部区域的机械咔哒声相当响亮。电容式触摸屏也可用于输入。
显示屏:2.2K 60 Hz IPS 面板令人失望
与 OmniBook 14 Ultra 一样,惠普再次为 OmniBook X AI 14 配备了分辨率为 2240 x 1400 像素(16:10)的 14 英寸 IPS 显示屏,不过面板 ID 有所不同。
测试设备在亮度方面的表现明显较差,平均值不到 300 cd/m²,是目前对比中亮度最弱的设备。
主观上,内容足够清晰,色彩鲜艳,对比度高。不过,60 赫兹的刷新率加上缓慢的响应时间,在日常使用中会明显感觉到,这也给人一种明显的重影印象。
虽然没有使用 PWM 闪烁,但在检查背光渗漏时会出现明显的光晕。亮度和色温都无法自动调节。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 303 cd/m²
Contrast: 1782:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
78.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
HP OmniBook X 14 BOE0C93, IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 BOE0C9E, IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5", 90 Hz | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite CSOT MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 17% | -9% | 17% | 13% | -5% | 10% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 78.9 | 99.9 27% | 67.1 -15% | 99.9 27% | 97.3 23% | 74.4 -6% | 97 23% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99 -1% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 78.7 | 97.6 24% | 68.9 -12% | 97.2 24% | 90.8 15% | 71.7 -9% | 85.2 8% |
Response Times | 98% | 23% | 97% | 99% | 54% | 98% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52 ? | 0.8 ? 98% | 35.9 ? 31% | 1.3 ? 97% | 0.39 ? 99% | 28.4 ? 45% | 0.83 ? 98% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32.8 ? | 0.8 ? 98% | 28 ? 15% | 1.2 ? 96% | 0.71 ? 98% | 12.4 ? 62% | 0.69 ? 98% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 240 ? | 360 ? | 240 | |||
Screen | 366% | 5% | 112% | 40% | 4% | 34% | |
Brightness middle | 303 | 500 65% | 359.5 19% | 385 27% | 472 56% | 395 30% | 392 29% |
Brightness | 293 | 499 70% | 361 23% | 382 30% | 475 62% | 387 32% | 398 36% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 97 8% | 92 2% | 95 6% | 97 8% | 90 0% | 97 8% |
Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.01 94% | 0.27 -59% | 0.03 82% | 0.33 -94% | ||
Contrast | 1782 | 50000 2706% | 1331 -25% | 12833 620% | 1197 -33% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 3.55 -37% | 1.64 37% | 1.99 23% | 1.4 46% | 1.86 28% | 1.3 50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.4 | 6.38 -18% | 4.68 13% | 3.69 32% | 4.1 24% | 3.48 36% | 3.2 41% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 2.2 41% | 2.6 30% | 0.8 78% | 2 46% | 2.52 32% | 2.3 38% |
Gamma | 2.09 105% | 1.94 113% | 2.22 99% | 2.204 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.35 94% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6543 99% | 6405 101% | 6388 102% | 6474 100% | 6493 100% | 6999 93% | 6517 100% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.55 | 0.97 | 1.79 | 1.86 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 160% /
244% | 6% /
4% | 75% /
88% | 51% /
43% | 18% /
9% | 47% /
39% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行了分析,显示质量一般,足以应付日常工作。
没有明显的偏色,色温也合适,但一些色彩偏差超过了 3 的重要限制,因此无法进行严肃的图像编辑。
我们的校准软件无法在 ARM OmniBook X 14 上运行,因此我们无法提供相应的 ICC 配置文件。sRGB 色彩空间已完全覆盖。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.7 ms rise | |
↘ 15.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.5 ms rise | |
↘ 27.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
高反光屏幕和低亮度的结合也会导致室内的可视性问题。
当然,这在室外更为明显,这对于一款专为移动而设计的设备来说并不理想。视角稳定性尚可。
性能不带双核 Turbo 的骁龙 X 精英版
测试条件
OmniBook X AI 14 不提供任何额外的能耗配置文件。我们使用 Windows最佳性能配置文件进行测试。
处理器X1E-78-100
惠普为 OmniBook X AI 14 配备了入门级 Snapdragon X Elite,即 X1E-78-100.它不提供双核涡轮增压,内核频率最高可达 3.4 GHz。TDP 无法读出,但根据功耗,我们推测 CPU 的功耗在短时间内可以达到 40-45 W,然后在 25-30 W 左右趋于平稳。
在本地基准测试中,只要有兼容的 ARM 软件,CPU 性能基本正常,完全可以胜任大多数办公任务。我们还在下面列出了其余的 CPU 基准测试,但这些都是模拟测试,因此不能代表性能潜力。
在电池模式下,性能保持稳定。更多 CPU 基准测试可参阅我们的 移动处理器基准测试列表.
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 |
Cinebench R15 multi-core loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP OmniBook X 14 -3! | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 -2! | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=63, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (8353 - 10960, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (1111 - 1130, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (3168 - 4193, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (408 - 426, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (1984 - 2351, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (208 - 216, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (313 - 428, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=56, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (38047 - 49172, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (4341 - 4703, n=6) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (6244 - 14043, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (1576 - 1805, n=4) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (6.39 - 7.57, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (55.1 - 59.7, n=5) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (0.724 - 0.77, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (6943 - 8203, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (20304 - 27958, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (3036 - 3319, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (67909 - 68494, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (1321 - 2303, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=58, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (11546 - 14598, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (53201 - 66840, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (658 - 794, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (2955 - 4271, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (27950 - 39220, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
系统性能
主观性能印象良好,系统对输入响应迅速。基准测试结果令人满意。
最大的问题仍然是兼容性,因为并非所有应用程序都有相应的 ARM 版本。您应该提前了解所需的软件是否能在该平台上运行。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (978 - 1401, n=6) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (913 - 1321, n=6) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1090 - 1435, n=6) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (869 - 1553, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (395 - 423, n=5) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=57, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (271 - 297, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=65, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (451 - 482, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (45988 - 66715, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (60078 - 122210, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=58, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (35073 - 49282, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite |
DPC 延迟
我们无法在 ARM OmniBook 上进行延迟测试。在播放 4K YouTube 视频时,没有出现明显的跳帧或丢帧问题。
大容量存储器
惠普安装了西部数据的 SN560 固态硬盘,容量为 1 TB,其中 879 GB 在初始启动后仍可用。
PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的性能完全正常,即使在持续负载的情况下也相当稳定。更多固态硬盘基准测试结果请点击 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
X1E-78-100 配备了速度较慢的 Adreno X1-85 GPU(3.8 TFLOPS),主频高达 1,250 MHz。该 iGPU 完全可以满足日常使用,包括播放高分辨率视频,但在游戏方面存在局限性。
除了性能较低外(也低于其他配备 X1-85 的笔记本电脑),性能不足的原因还在于原生游戏列表有限。模拟游戏可能会出现兼容性问题。例如,《博德之门 3》在测试过程中就无法运行。
在持续负载和电池模式下,GPU 性能保持稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 3553 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3121 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 899 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 253 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1034 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (545 - 899, n=10) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10.3 - 31.4, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 98.3 | 92.6 | 43.5 | 19.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 85.7 | 66.6 | 61.9 | 53.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 51 | 24.8 | 15.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.7 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 37 | 29 | 28 | 25 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 138 | 52 | 43 | 37 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 23.9 | 19.5 | 16.6 | 14.5 |
排放与能源:相对安静且省电
噪音排放
在大多数情况下,OmniBook X AI 14 是一款相对安静的设备。在日常工作中,你不会听到超过低风扇噪音(约 30 dB(A))的声音,但在高负载情况下,噪音会迅速达到约 37 dB(A)。
单个风扇的高速运转在这里非常明显,主观上,噪音比数值显示的更明显。测试设备上没有其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 23.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 29.7 / 37.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.7 dB(A) |
HP OmniBook X 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -14% | -7% | -10% | -1% | -2% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 23.7 | 25 -5% | 23.8 -0% | 24 -1% | 24.1 -2% | 23 3% | 24 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.7 | 25 -5% | 24.9 -5% | 24 -1% | 24.1 -2% | 23 3% | 24 -1% |
Idle Average * | 23.7 | 26 -10% | 24.9 -5% | 25 -5% | 24.1 -2% | 23 3% | 24 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.7 | 29 -22% | 24.9 -5% | 27 -14% | 24.1 -2% | 23 3% | 26.3 -11% |
Load Average * | 29.7 | 40 -35% | 32.9 -11% | 40 -35% | 25.3 15% | 27.2 8% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.1 | 40 -8% | 40.9 -10% | 39 -5% | 38.6 -4% | 40.79 -10% | 27.2 27% |
Load Maximum * | 37.1 | 41 -11% | 43 -16% | 40 -8% | 40.5 -9% | 41.72 -12% | 27.2 27% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
OmniBook X AI 14 的散热能力还体现在我们记录的表面温度上。在日常使用中没有问题,但在高负载情况下,设备的一侧会发热--我们测得的温度高达 44 °C。
这还不是导致可用性问题的临界值,但会导致打字时手指发热。在压力测试中,GPU 时钟稳定在 1,250 MHz,而 CPU 内核的平均频率略低于 1.6 GHz。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
HP OmniBook X 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | -12% | -19% | -14% | -27% | -10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.2 | 41 7% | 40.4 9% | 49 -11% | 44.9 -2% | 45 -2% | 47.9 -8% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.5 | 45 -1% | 43.6 2% | 59 -33% | 51.5 -16% | 49 -10% | 51.3 -15% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.1 | 26 -4% | 31 -24% | 28 -12% | 28.9 -15% | 36 -43% | 26.7 -6% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.3 | 28 -15% | 32.2 -33% | 29 -19% | 29.4 -21% | 37 -52% | 26.9 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
扬声器
OmniBook X AI 14 使用 Poly Studio(惠普前不久收购的公司)的立体声扬声器,声音非常大,中高音再现非常清晰,给人留下深刻印象。这对语音清晰度尤其有利(例如在会议期间)。
不过,它的弱点是低音,这也是为什么音乐或电影的沉浸感不强的原因。
HP OmniBook X 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
在空闲测量中,OmniBook X AI 14 的功耗并不高,这充分体现了黑屏和低分辨率显示屏的优势。
在负载情况下,我们短暂测得的最大功耗略低于 68 W,在压力测试中,功耗降至 35 W 左右。因此,随机附带的 65 瓦电源供应充足,在压力测试开始时甚至不需要使用电池。待机功耗略高,为 0.8 瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.41 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 2.5 / 4.7 / 6.2 Watt |
Load |
25.6 / 67.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP OmniBook X 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -32% | -47% | -98% | -30% | -51% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.5 | 5 -100% | 2.7 -8% | 6 -140% | 5.1 -104% | 6.4 -156% | 5.4 -116% |
Idle Average * | 4.7 | 6 -28% | 5.4 -15% | 8 -70% | 8.4 -79% | 9.3 -98% | 9.7 -106% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.2 | 10 -61% | 5.5 11% | 14 -126% | 8.6 -39% | 10.7 -73% | 10.2 -65% |
Load Average * | 25.6 | 36 -41% | 67.4 -163% | 76 -197% | 26.1 -2% | 28.9 -13% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.3 | 41.6 -3% | 67.9 -68% | 58.6 -45% | 37.2 8% | 35 13% | 24.7 39% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 36.7 | 38.2 -4% | 67.8 -85% | 61.9 -69% | 35.3 4% | 35 5% | 22 40% |
Load Maximum * | 67.9 | 60 12% | 68.3 -1% | 94 -38% | 67.1 1% | 67 1% | 68.2 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Energieaufnahme Cyberpunk / Stresstest
Power consumption: External monitor
电池寿命
与低功耗值相结合,59 Whr 电池的运行时间明显优于同类产品。在亮度为 150 cd/m²(相当于测试设备最大亮度的 80%)的情况下,我们测得的运行时间约为 18.5 小时,在全亮度情况下超过 14 小时。
不要忘记,OmniBook X AI 14 的显示屏亮度并不高。在 150 cd/m² 的视频测试中,我们注意到电池运行时间接近 22 小时。只有在满负荷的情况下,才会在大约 1.5 小时后结束。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要 158 分钟(98 分钟后达到 80%)。
HP OmniBook X 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 59 Wh | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M, 68 Wh | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 65 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 55.9 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -33% | -23% | 34% | -21% | -14% | -25% | -12% | |
H.264 | 1298 | 1028 -21% | 827 -36% | 917 ? -29% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 1117 | 753 -33% | 661 -41% | 990 -11% | 892 -20% | 964 -14% | 539 -52% | 729 ? -35% |
Load | 92 | 88 -4% | 165 79% | 73 -21% | 103 12% | 116.5 ? 27% |
Notebookcheck 对 OmniBook X AI 14 的总体印象
惠普推出的 OmniBook X AI 14 是一款配备骁龙处理器的 14 英寸轻薄移动笔记本电脑。其性能足以满足日常使用,但必须考虑到 ARM 版本的软件支持有限。更大的问题是屏幕太弱,反光率高,亮度也不高,而且只能以 60 Hz 的频率运行,这至少能保证良好的电池续航时间。
HP OmniBook X 14
- 12/18/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.