Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPU

3.8 TFLOPS Adreno GPU(骁龙 X)是高通公司骁龙 X Elite 和 X Plus 系列处理器配备的集成图形适配器。由于底层架构较老,iGPU 支持 DirectX 12,但不支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate,尽管支持光线追踪和 VRS。此外,还支持 OpenGL ES 3.2 和 Vulcan 1.3,以及流行的 AVC、HEVC 和 AV1 视频编解码器(包括解码和编码)。

该适配器可提供高达 3.8 TFLOPS 的性能。作为参考,最慢的专业 Nvidia Ada 代笔记本电脑显卡,即 RTX 500 Ada可提供高达 9.2 TFLOPS 的性能。支持的最高显示器分辨率是 UHD 2160p,而不是 SUHD 4320p(英特尔 HD 4320p)。英特尔AMDiGPU 提供后者已有一段时间)。

性能

它的游戏性能令人失望。 35 瓦 Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100测试结果。虽然比老化的 英特尔 Iris Xe (96 EUs)的速度,但 Adreno 却无法超越 Radeon 780M这意味着它无法与全尺寸独立显卡(如 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的性能。Baldur's Gate 3 ,一款 2023 年发布的三A 级游戏,在 1080p / Low 下基本无法运行。GTA V在 1080p / High 下运行良好,但这是一款 2015 年才面世的游戏。

Snapdragon X Series

SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS GPU? Bit @ 8448 MHz
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPU? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Memory Speed8448 MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption35 Watt
technology4 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesSUHD 2160p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/AV1 encoding and decoding
Date of Announcement26.10.2023
CPU in SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-10012 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-10012 x ? MHz, 35 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-10010 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1799     avg: 1860     median: 1889 (5%)     max: 1893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1617     avg: 1672     median: 1698 (4%)     max: 1700 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -93%
...
1281 -23%
1322 -21%
AMD Radeon Pro 560
1376 -18%
NVIDIA Quadro P620
1388 -17%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
1395 -17%
AMD Radeon 660M
1482 -11%
1495 -11%
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
1614 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
1615 -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)
1672
1724 3%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
1735 4%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
1788 7%
1796 7%
1810 8%
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
1814 8%
1876 12%
2021 21%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
2046 22%
...
19434 1062%
max:
36485 2082%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
18704 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
29343 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5346     avg: 5787     median: 5911 (10%)     max: 6104 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5569     avg: 6103     median: 6294 (7%)     max: 6446 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 6248     avg: 6286     median: 6285.5 (7%)     max: 6323 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5372     avg: 6363     median: 6846 (9%)     max: 6870 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4823     avg: 5829     median: 6311 (5%)     max: 6352 Points
171.8 -97%
...
AMD Radeon Pro 560
5305 -9%
5310 -9%
5334 -8%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
5345 -8%
AMD Radeon Pro 455
5388 -8%
AMD FirePro M6100
5445 -7%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X
5515 -5%
5542 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
5673 -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)
5829
5885 1%
5910 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P620
5939 2%
5990 3%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
6033 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
6071 4%
6074 4%
6142 5%
6355 9%
...
59943 928%
max:
106023 1719%
0%
100%
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 22.6     avg: 23.9     median: 23.3 (1%)     max: 25.7 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 48.8     avg: 49.2     median: 49.2 (20%)     max: 49.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 105.7     avg: 106.2     median: 106.2 (19%)     max: 106.7 fps
3.3 -97%
...
87.5 -18%
89.3 -16%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 -14%
93.2 -12%
94.7 -11%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
96 -10%
96.8 -9%
Apple M3 8-Core GPU
101.7 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
102.9 -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)
106.2
108 2%
109 3%
110 4%
110.2 4%
118.5 12%
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
147 38%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
153 44%
161.4 52%
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
166 56%
...
536 405%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 266.9     avg: 296.6     median: 281.7 (21%)     max: 356 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 244.9     median: 315 (2%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 19879     avg: 20137     median: 20059 (6%)     max: 20551 points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 23348     avg: 23563     median: 23535.5 (8%)     max: 23831 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 16.1     avg: 17     median: 17.3 (2%)     max: 17.7 Watt
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 21.4     avg: 23.8     median: 23.8 (3%)     max: 26.2 Watt
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 23.1     avg: 26.5     median: 26.5 (6%)     max: 29.9 Watt
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 33.5     avg: 36.1     median: 35.8 (16%)     max: 39 Watt
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 26.8     avg: 33.9     median: 36 (5%)     max: 38.9 Watt
051015202530354045Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
30.6 dB(A) (49%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
85.1 87.6 88.2 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.9 55.2 63.8 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
21 22.1 22.7 23 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.7 18.3 18.8 18.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15 16.3 16.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.2 14.3 14.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
34.6
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
12.1
11.4
12
low 1920x1080
23.1 23.2 24.3 24.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.3 19.6 19.7 20.3 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.5 17.1 17.2 17.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.3 16.6 16.9 17 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.5
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
54.7 57 57.6 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.6 50.1 51 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.2 37 38 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27 28.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
60
94.2
low 1920x1080
41.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
67.6
low 1280x720
56 57 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25 25 25 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 23 23 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
68 114.3 137 137 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.6 49 51 51 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.7 42 42 43 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32 36 37 37 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
29.5 36.4 36.5 37.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
51 53.6 57.3 57.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23 24.9 24.9 25 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.3 15.4 15.6 15.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
72.4 77.9 80.3 85.9 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.9 60.9 63.3 65.7 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.1 55.9 57.8 61.7 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.3 51.1 51.6 53.2 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
107 109.2 112 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68 70.9 73 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.7 40 42 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.5 18.8 19 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
86.3 99.7 100.6 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
82.9 94.1 96.3 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.8 48.4 50 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.4 21.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Total War Pharaoh8757
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty22181614
Baldur's Gate 324201717
F1 2256503728
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands41.530.820.616.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider582523
Strange Brigade114494136
X-Plane 11.1135
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark552415
Dota 2 Reborn79615851
The Witcher 3109714118
GTA V96914821
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
5
5
4
4
3
5
5

6
2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 04. 15:06:27

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:31:02 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.049s ... 0.05s

#4 composed specs +0s ... 0.05s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.05s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11630 +0.015s ... 0.065s

#8 got single benchmarks 11630 +0.02s ... 0.085s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.443s ... 0.528s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.528s

#12 Got 200 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.546s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.546s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.554s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.454s ... 1.007s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 1.01s

#17 return log +0s ... 1.01s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) graphics card

惠普 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 笔记本电脑评测:对ARM平台Windows寄予厚望

惠普 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 笔记本电脑评测:对ARM平台Windows寄予厚望

微软又一次在 Windows ARM 上下了大赌注,不过这次是高通公司推出的搭载 AI 技术的新型骁龙处理器。虽然这款新芯片在某些方面相当出色,但在某些关键领域却难以赶上英特尔、AMD 和Apple 的最新产品。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
微软 Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ 评测--搭载骁龙 X Elite 的高端二合一设备

微软 Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ 评测--搭载骁龙 X Elite 的高端二合一设备

第 11 代 Surface Pro 2-in-1 将赌注押在了高通公司新推出的 Snapdragon ARM 处理器上。此外,还可选配 120 Hz 高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏,在 HDR 模式下亮度可达 900 尼特。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) | 13.00" | 870 g
高通公司 Snapdragon X Elite 分析 - 效率高于 AMD 和英特尔,但Apple 仍处于领先地位

高通公司 Snapdragon X Elite 分析 - 效率高于 AMD 和英特尔,但Apple 仍处于领先地位

在微软和所有主要笔记本电脑制造商的支持下,高通公司在正式发布约九个月后推出了新款骁龙 X Elite。我们对小型 X1E-78-100 和 X1E-80-100 进行了测试,并将它们与 AMD、Apple 和英特尔的现有芯片进行了比较。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) | 15.60" | 1.4 kg
高通公司 Snapdragon X Elite 分析 - 效率高于 AMD 和英特尔,但Apple 仍处于领先地位

高通公司 Snapdragon X Elite 分析 - 效率高于 AMD 和英特尔,但Apple 仍处于领先地位

在微软和所有主要笔记本电脑制造商的支持下,高通公司在正式发布约九个月后推出了新款骁龙 X Elite。我们对小型 X1E-78-100 和 X1E-80-100 进行了测试,并将它们与 AMD、Apple 和英特尔的现有芯片进行了比较。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) | 13.00" | 870 g
华硕 Vivobook S 15 OLED 评测--全新骁龙 X 精英版笔记本电脑的新时代?

华硕 Vivobook S 15 OLED 评测--全新骁龙 X 精英版笔记本电脑的新时代?

Vivobook S 15 OLED 以前只配备 AMD 和英特尔处理器,但现在,新的 ARM 芯片--骁龙 X Elite 首次出现在这款大型多媒体笔记本电脑中。因此,这款普通得出奇的笔记本电脑配备了令人印象深刻的 OLED 面板,但遗憾的是,它并不能运行所有的应用程序和游戏。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) | 15.60" | 1.4 kg

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, 15.60", 1.4 kg
   » 骁龙 X 精英版在 GravityMark GPU 测试中落后于 iPhone 15 Pro,这一反常现象令人震惊

SD X Elite Reference 80W: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, 0.00"
   » 首次骁龙 X Elite 基准测试:与 M2 Max、Ryzen 9 7940HS、英特尔第 13 代-H 和第 14 代台式机 CPU 相比,性能大幅提升

   » 首次骁龙 X Elite 基准测试:与 M2 Max、Ryzen 9 7940HS、英特尔第 13 代-H 和第 14 代台式机 CPU 相比,性能大幅提升

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Arc 130V *
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > Qualcomm SD X Adreno 3.8 TFLOPS GPU
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-06-21)