Notebookcheck Logo

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 评测--配备彩色电子墨水显示屏和摄像头的高端平板电脑

不仅仅是阅读

当然,你可以在 Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 上阅读彩色书籍,但你还可以做更多事情:借助手写笔输入,你可以画画或记笔记;借助Android 系统,你可以运行应用程序,甚至还可以拍照。但也有一些限制...
Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen E-Ink
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
10.30 inch 4:3, 1240 x 930 pixel 150 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, e-ink, 4096 color levels, 2480 x 1860 pixels in b/w mode, glossy: no
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio via , Card Reader: microSDHC (up to 2 TB, dedicated), 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.6 x 225 x 184.5
Battery
4600 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix LED flash
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, USB-C cable, Boox Pen2Pro, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
450 g
Price
700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

可能的竞争对手比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

外壳和设备 - 金属外壳内有大量存储空间

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 采用深灰色的前卫金属外壳,一眼就能看出它不是一款经济实惠的电子阅读器。背面的塑料条上装饰着一些小符号,这也给它带来了一些变化,并确保了更好的无线局域网接收效果。背面还有一个摄像头模块,当你把平板电脑平放在桌子上操作时,会导致平板电脑轻微晃动。

Tab Ultra C Pro 重 450 克(约 1 磅),比同等尺寸的其他电子墨水平板电脑要重。做工显示出良好的质量,但当你在没有保护套的情况下将设备拿在手中时,你可能会希望边缘更圆润一些。

Onyx Boox 平板电脑配备 6GB 内存和 128GB UFS 3.1 闪存,存储空间充足。虽然没有耳机插孔,但可以通过背面的 Pogo Pins 连接键盘底座。USB-C 端口可以传输数据或为设备充电。

如果您觉得丰富的存储空间仍然不够用,还可以使用 microSD 卡。虽然读卡器的工作速度相当快,但仍无法充分利用我们的高品质 Angelbird V60 参考卡的最高速度。

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro

尺寸比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "0" not supported!
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
35.5 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
34.4 MB/s -3%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
  (Angelbird V60)
28.6 MB/s -19%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.9 (27.9-51.7)
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø43.5 (28.7-54.3)
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78 (29-85.6)
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.9 (35.8-86.7)

通信、软件和操作 - 支持Android 和笔输入

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 配备了 WiFi 5 模块,由于采用了多根天线,传输速率可达到 500 Mbit/s 左右。虽然这无法让您充分利用千兆互联网连接,但根据我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE 11000 参考路由器进行的测试,您仍然可以获得相当稳定的快速传输速率。

不过 华为 MatePad Paper配备了速度更快的 WiFi 6 调制解调器,也表明在这方面可以做得更多。

这款平板电脑的软件基于Android 12,用户界面根据电子墨水显示屏进行了调整。由于已经预装了 Google Play 商店,因此还可以轻松安装Android 应用程序,从而大大扩展了平板电脑的使用场景。其他预装应用包括字典、笔记应用、文档扫描仪和音乐播放器。

在我们进行测试时,最新的软件来自 2023 年 10 月底,因此仍然相当新。尽管 Onyx 会不时提供更新,但并没有具体承诺更新的具体时间。

电容式触摸屏工作可靠,但电子墨水显示屏的响应速度较慢。尽管 Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 的快速 SoC 很好地弥补了这一不足,但操作仍然不如采用 IPS 或 OLED 屏幕的平板电脑流畅。待机键上还集成了指纹传感器,以提供一定的安全性。它工作可靠,解锁速度相当快。

Onyx 还配备了一支手写笔,可用于绘图或记事。Tab Ultra C Pro 还有一个带触摸板的键盘盖,可将平板电脑变成笔记本电脑的理想替代品。该配件可从KEX 购买,价格约为 170 欧元(约合 183 美元)。提供了我们的借用设备。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper
945 (826min - 958max) MBit/s +101%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
470.3 (462min - 483max) MBit/s
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
350 (322min - 366max) MBit/s -26%
Lenovo Smart Paper
286 (236min - 308max) MBit/s -39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper
928 (812min - 949max) MBit/s +84%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
505 (437min - 545max) MBit/s
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
294 (274min - 318max) MBit/s -42%
Lenovo Smart Paper
211 (186min - 246max) MBit/s -58%

Legend

 
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, ARM Mali-G57 MP6, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510540Tooltip
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø504 (437-545)
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø470 (462-483)

相机 - 带有惊喜的简易相机

平板电脑的背面装有一个 1600 万像素的摄像头,包括 LED 闪光灯,适合扫描二维码和文件,还可以拍照。虽然质量并不出众,但对于快照或记录情况来说已经足够。

拍出来的照片看起来很暗,在光线不足的情况下还会非常模糊,并带有明显的色调。你不应该期望能看到太多细节。在我们的工作室里,在全光照条件下,照片会显得非常暗淡,而在只有 1 Lux 的光照条件下,图像只能勉强辨认。

您还可以录制视频,甚至是 4K 分辨率的视频。但图像质量也很一般,尽管对于配备电子墨水显示屏的平板电脑来说,这一功能本身就很特别。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
ColorChecker
8.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro: 7.7 ∆E min: 2.01 - max: 14.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
34.2 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
52.8 ∆E
37 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
61.3 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
46 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
76.1 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
93 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
51 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro: 46.36 ∆E min: 11.68 - max: 92.97 ∆E

电子阅读 - 非常灵活,支持应用程序

虽然 Onyx Store 无法在欧洲使用,但它至少提供了一些开源书籍(主要是英文版)供下载。不过,有了应用程序支持,你也可以顺利安装和使用 Tolino、Kindle 或其他阅读器应用程序。但无论如何,大多数用户还是希望主要通过浏览器来购买书籍,因为谷歌对应用内购买的利润率要求太高,大多数供应商都无法承受。

阅读器支持 pdf(可回流)、epub、Adobe DRM、txt、rtf、html、chm、doc 和 fb2,对各种数据类型的支持都很不错,还可以通过应用程序支持进行扩展。

快速的处理器让翻阅书籍变得非常愉快,新页面的呈现速度非常快。预装的阅读器应用程序允许您对显示进行大量配置,由于支持人工智能,书中的数字和示意图绘制得非常完美,突出显示的部分也显示得非常准确。

显示屏:带照明的彩色电子墨水屏

显示屏特写
显示屏特写

Onyx 平板电脑的电子墨水显示屏的工作方式与 IPS 或 OLED 屏幕完全不同:电子墨水显示屏的工作方式与 IPS 或 OLED 屏幕完全不同:小墨水颗粒集成在单个像素中,可通过不同的电荷激活。在黑白模式下,电子墨水显示屏可达到 2,480 x 1,860 像素的扩展全高清分辨率,而在彩色模式下,分辨率只有黑白模式的一半。

彩色显示屏的色调为 4,096 色,与液晶显示屏的流畅性相比还有很大差距,不过对于彩色漫画或文档来说,还是非常不错的。不过,由于显示屏相当大,彩色模式下的低分辨率就变得非常明显了。

虽然可以相当流畅地在 Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 的屏幕上播放视频内容,但由于色彩较少,加上之前图像残留的重影,图像往往还是会显得模糊不清。因此在这方面,电子墨水并不能真正取代 IPS 或 OLED 显示屏。

在日光下,你不需要任何背景照明就能读取图像内容,而且一旦图像渲染完成,屏幕也不会再耗电。但如果光线较暗,照明效果就会略显薄弱,最高只能达到 45 cd/m²,屏幕的耗电量也会增加。 联想智能纸的亮度要高得多。

特别是黑白内容看起来非常清晰,由于 SoC 功能强大,对于电子墨水面板来说,新图像的渲染速度非常快。此外,这项技术也不会产生任何 PWM 闪烁。

44
cd/m²
45
cd/m²
43
cd/m²
43
cd/m²
44
cd/m²
42
cd/m²
43
cd/m²
44
cd/m²
41
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 45 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 43.2 cd/m² Minimum: 0.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 44 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 19.76 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 10.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
1.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.202
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
E-Ink, 1240x930, 10.3"
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
E-Ink Kaleido 3, 1240x930, 10.3"
Lenovo Smart Paper
E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.3"
Huawei MatePad Paper
E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.3"
Response Times
-3%
23%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
105.5 ?(50.8, 54.7)
121 ?(66.8, 54.2)
-15%
134.4 ?(56.2, 68.2)
-27%
121 ?(61, 60)
-15%
Response Time Black / White *
98.1 ?(45.6, 52.5)
89.3 ?(43.5, 45.8)
9%
27.5 ?(14.4, 13.1)
72%
94 ?(47, 47)
4%
PWM Frequency
Screen
0%
75%
21%
Brightness middle
44
46.5
6%
113
157%
61.9
41%
Brightness
43
47
9%
106
147%
60
40%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
83
-9%
80
-12%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
19.76
20.45
-3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
37.12
39.33
-6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
10.5
11.1
-6%
9.9
6%
9.1
13%
Gamma
1.202 183%
1.211 182%
1.371 160%
2.02 109%
CCT
6629 98%
6463 101%
7116 91%
6848 95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -1%
49% / 58%
8% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
98.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 45.6 ms rise
↘ 52.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
105.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 50.8 ms rise
↘ 54.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功耗大的老式处理器

高通 高通骁龙 855高通骁龙 855 已经是一款较老的高端处理器,前段时间还被用于价格更低廉的高端智能手机。有了它,Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 成为目前配备电子墨水显示屏的平板电脑中速度最快的产品之一。尽管面板反应较慢,但你仍然可以相当快速地浏览菜单。

几乎所有可用的应用程序都能在平板电脑上顺利运行,多任务处理也不成问题。此外,图形性能也达到了较高水平。Onyx 采用的 UFS 3.1 存储系统非常匹配,数据传输非常快,加载时间也很短。尽管存储控制器的运行并不理想,导致平板电脑的写入性能不尽如人意,但数据存储的整体速度仍然非常快。

在负载情况下,Onyx Boxx Tab Ultra C Pro 没有明显的发热现象,SoC 在高负载或连续负载情况下也不会降低性能。

这款电子墨水平板电脑的侧面配有立体声扬声器,声音也不差。尽管最大音量不是很高,但音乐听起来并不失真,而且很容易入耳。您还可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器。遗憾的是,由于 Onyx Boox 平板电脑的软件没有提供这方面的信息,我们无法知道它支持哪些无线传输编解码器。

这款电子墨水平板电脑的电池容量为 4,600 mAh,非常强劲,续航时间大大超过竞争对手:在显示屏亮度极低的情况下,您可以阅读长达 20:44 小时,因此在沙发上阅读一整天应该没有问题。平板电脑完全充满电需要 3 小时或更长时间,这取决于开始时的电池电量。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
744 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (552 - 751, n=7)
717 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
566 Points -24%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
323 Points -57%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
143 Points -81%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2164 - 2856, n=7)
2572 Points +13%
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points +10%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2268 Points
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1853 Points -18%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1287 Points -43%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
312 Points -86%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)
1111 Points +10%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1008 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  ()
1008 Points 0%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
436 Points -57%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
203 Points -80%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)
3544 Points +29%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2757 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  ()
2757 Points 0%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
865 Points -69%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
493 Points -82%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9847 Points +17%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8421 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  ()
8421 Points 0%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4535 Points -46%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4045 Points -52%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5747, n=20)
5489 Points +13%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4851 Points
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2571 Points -47%
Average of class Tablet
  (361 - 14235, n=46, last 2 years)
2067 Points -57%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1231 Points -75%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
567 Points -88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5429 - 6362, n=20)
6201 Points +14%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5429 Points
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2675 Points -51%
Average of class Tablet
  (290 - 24605, n=46, last 2 years)
2198 Points -60%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1077 Points -80%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
517 Points -90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4612, n=20)
3954 Points +12%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3534 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (858 - 5751, n=46, last 2 years)
2797 Points -21%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2462 Points -30%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2262 Points -36%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
858 Points -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6404, n=20)
5819 Points 0%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5803 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 17674, n=66, last 2 years)
4499 Points -22%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4281 Points -26%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1079 Points -81%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
596 Points -90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7148, n=20)
6793 Points +2%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6636 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 29325, n=66, last 2 years)
5876 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4472 Points -33%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1191 Points -82%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
530 Points -92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 5024, n=20)
3942 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
3725 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 7451, n=66, last 2 years)
3632 Points -10%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1061 Points -74%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
812 Points -80%
Wild Life Score
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2951 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  ()
2951 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1925 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1748 Points -41%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
437 Points -85%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
286 Points -90%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 32525, n=73, last 2 years)
4720 Points +53%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3079 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  ()
3079 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1886 Points -39%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
418 Points -86%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
289 Points -91%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 8689, n=74, last 2 years)
1334 Points +54%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
867 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  ()
867 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
625 Points -28%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
130 Points -85%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
75 Points -91%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 8889, n=73, last 2 years)
1564 Points +81%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
864 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  ()
864 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
609 Points -30%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
125 Points -86%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
72 Points -92%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (17 - 38, n=20)
32.5 fps +71%
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 120, n=79, last 2 years)
27.4 fps +44%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
19 fps 0%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
19 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4.6 fps -76%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3 fps -84%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 340, n=79, last 2 years)
55.9 fps +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=21)
39.9 fps +5%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
29 fps -24%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps -80%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.9 fps -90%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (11 - 26, n=20)
20.9 fps +61%
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 106.4, n=79, last 2 years)
19 fps +46%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
13 fps 0%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2.7 fps -79%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.9 fps -85%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 114.5, n=79, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=21)
16.2 fps +8%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
15 fps
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
10 fps -33%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2.9 fps -81%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.4 fps -91%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 55.1, n=77, last 2 years)
10 fps +52%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6.6 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  ()
6.6 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4.8 fps -27%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1.3 fps -80%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
0.6 fps -91%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33918 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (17011 - 33918, n=21)
23749 Points -30%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
18755 Points -45%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6358 Points -81%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5022 Points -85%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C ProOnyx Boox Note Air 3 CLenovo Smart PaperHuawei MatePad PaperAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-82%
-21%
52%
23%
Sequential Read 256KB
1487
690.8
-54%
163
-89%
880.1
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB
302.2
384.1
27%
139
-54%
256.2
-15%
Random Read 4KB
226.8
157.7
-30%
25.3
-89%
145.6
-36%
Random Write 4KB
169.9
160.5
-6%
8.8
-95%
183.1
8%

温度

Max. Load
 23.5 °C23.6 °C23.6 °C 
 23.8 °C24.5 °C23.8 °C 
 24.1 °C25.2 °C24.2 °C 
Maximum: 25.2 °C
Average: 24 °C
24.5 °C24.5 °C24.5 °C
24.5 °C24.7 °C24.7 °C
24.5 °C25.6 °C25.2 °C
Maximum: 25.6 °C
Average: 24.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


热图前端
热图前端
热图返回
热图返回
01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.53 (4.51-4.71)
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.447 (0.4391-0.4529)
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.74 (3.73-3.75)
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.1 (15.8-17.5)
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø1.728 (1.71-1.735)
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø11.3 (10.9-11.3)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203837.42529.431.53126.326.64032.8295037.832.46329.724.58022.717.710018.917.412520.622.816012.935.52009.236.425010.343.53157.3484006.854.65008.659.263012.364.380010.763.910001166.712508.760.716008.76220009.260.9250010.261.9315011.465.6400013.255500014.555.3630014.459.1800015.361.51000016.350.91250016.3421600017.230.1SPL24.773.8N0.532.7median 11.4median 55.3Delta3.310.943.939.334.536.227.729.728.535.633.235.226.334.823.432.422.538.215.443.714.649.612.352.313.357.711.659.77.562.811.467.815.266.814.769.811.872.7127310.376.29.372.310.869.814.767.614.358.914.964.11566.615.46316.856.416.151.91754.225.982.10.750.6median 14.6median 632.17.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnyx Boox Tab Ultra C ProHuawei MatePad Paper
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MatePad Paper audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Huawei MatePad Paper
3625 mAh
478 min
Average of class Tablet
  (309 - 476, n=4, last 2 years)
381 min
Battery Runtime - Reader / Idle
Average of class Tablet
  (691 - 5003, n=63, last 2 years)
1834 min +47%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
4600 mAh
1244 min
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
3700 mAh
1030 min
Lenovo Smart Paper
3500 mAh
1056 min
Huawei MatePad Paper
3625 mAh
963 min
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
20h 44min

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ 高品质金属外壳
+ 快速处理器
+ 大量存储空间
+ 包括 4K 视频录制在内的摄像头
+ 附带输入笔
+ 兼容Android 应用程序
+ 阅读不伤眼

Cons

- 重型
- 对播放视频的适用性有限
- 价格昂贵
- 显示屏反应慢

结论 - 最快的电子墨水平板电脑之一

测试 Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro。测试装置由 Kex GmbH (Kex.de) 提供
测试 Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro。测试装置由 Kex GmbH (Kex.de) 提供

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 拥有大功率、笔输入、彩色屏幕、大容量电池、充足的存储空间,甚至还有摄像头,可能是目前市面上配置最好的电子墨水平板电脑之一。花 700 欧元(美国售价 650 美元)的高价,你就能得到一个绝对流畅的系统,还能让你顺利安装和使用Android 应用程序。此外,它还拥有快速的存储空间,甚至可以通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。

这款平板电脑的电子墨水彩色显示屏非常有趣,甚至可以快速流畅地播放视频。另一方面,有限的色彩空间和苍白的色彩显示,以及经常可见的重影痕迹,使得这款平板电脑不适合频繁地重现视频。精确的手写笔输入功能弥补了这一不足,让用户也能使用平板电脑进行一些生产性工作。

扬声器音效不错,电池续航时间也完全令人信服。

摄像头更多是用于快照和扫描二维码或文档,但它是一个很好的补充,在电子墨水平板电脑中几乎是独一无二的功能。长时间阅读时,较高的重量可能会让你的手臂感到疲劳。 华为 MatePad Paper还表明,更高的无线局域网速度是可以实现的。

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 提供了丰富的设备和一些独特的功能,足以证明其高昂的价格。

如果你可以不使用彩色显示屏,那么一些价格明显更实惠的替代产品,如功能同样强大的 华为 MatePad Paper等,不过它们的应用程序兼容性有限。奥尼克斯 Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C功率稍低,没有摄像头,但也有彩色显示屏,而且价格便宜得多。

价格和供应情况

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 在 Onyx Boox 在线商店或亚马逊有售,售价约为 美元。亚马逊。如果您从 Onyx Boox 商店购买平板电脑,则会随附一个磁性保护套和一些替换笔尖。此外,还可另加约 150 美元购买键盘盖。

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro - 12/08/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
42 / 70 → 60%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
85%
Display
68%
Games Performance
50 / 78 → 64%
Application Performance
86 / 92 → 93%
Temperature
98%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Camera
57 / 85 → 67%
Average
75%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro 评测--配备彩色电子墨水显示屏和摄像头的高端平板电脑
Florian Schmitt, 2023-12-11 (Update: 2023-12-11)