Oppo A16s智能手机评测--价格低廉的耐力跑，带NFC功能
Possible competitors in comparison
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Speicher | Groesse | Aufloesung | Refresh-Rate | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Oppo A16s Helio G35, PowerVR GE8320 | 190 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 | 060 Hz | |
| 80.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | 090 Hz | |
| 75.7 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy M12 Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1 | 214 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | 090 Hz | |
| 77.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2020 | Realme 7i Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 208 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | 060 Hz |
案例、设备和操作
Oppo A16s主要由塑料制成，但仍有高质量的外观和坚实的结构。只有正面有熊猫MN228玻璃保护。这款Oppo智能手机有水晶黑和珍珠蓝两种颜色，根据IPX4标准有防泼水保护。
这款手机的功能在同类产品中是典型的。A16s提供全面的双SIM卡（2x nano）和microSD支持。用于内存扩展的插槽在复制测试中显示出良好的传输速率，并且还掌握了exFAT文件系统。USB端口根据2.0标准工作，并提供OTG，以便将外部存储媒体和外围设备连接到智能手机。顺便说一下，与没有s附属物的Oppo A16的唯一区别是，测试版本有一个NFC芯片。
谷歌Android 11被用作操作系统，Oppo在其11.1版本中剥离了其ColorOS用户界面。在测试时，安全更新截至2021年8月5日，这仍然是相当最新的。不幸的是，缺少一个DRM认证，所以相应的受保护的内容不能以高清播放。
充其量，LTE可用于移动互联网接入。频率设备还算不错，所以在欧洲应该不会有任何限制。只要把A16s拿在耳边，噪音不太大，电话功能就很好，因为后者只被适度过滤掉。它在扬声器模式下确实有轻微的混响，但其他方面的质量和麦克风范围都很好。支持VoLTE。
Wi-Fi 5的双频模块可用于Wi-Fi连接，与我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12相结合，可提供体面的传输速率。在日常使用中，观察到的数据接收波动并没有被注意到的负面作用。
触摸屏受到屏幕保护膜的保护，该保护膜具有良好的滑行性能，并且应用得很干净。电源按钮上的指纹传感器可用于生物识别安全。它具有良好的识别率，工作速度也不错。另外，通过前置摄像头进行面部识别也是可能的，但它的安全性较低。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Oppo A16s (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Realme 7i | |
| Oppo A16s | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | |
| Oppo A16s | |
| Realme 7i | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
奥普A16s的AI三摄像头
前置摄像头没有特别高的分辨率，但它仍然可以实现相当好的自拍。特别是自动HDR功能在背光下提供了比许多对手更好的效果。
三重摄像头提供了标准配置。主镜头拍摄的照片相当不错，但它们的特点是动态较弱，精细的细节在背景中看起来很模糊。两个附加镜头负责景深和特写（微距）。
前置和后置摄像头均以每秒30帧的全高清方式记录视频。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleWide-angleZoom (5x)Low-Light
显示屏 - Oppo智能手机采用明亮的LCD
OPPO的A16s的6.52英寸LC屏幕只有一个小的高清分辨率。这并不导致特别高的像素密度，但你必须非常仔细地看才能看到像素结构。
在激活环境光的情况下，屏幕的亮度要高一些，在屏幕中心达到607 cd/m²。如果手动调节亮度，仍然可以达到549cd/m²，在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下（APL50），可以达到576cd/m²。
在默认设置中，显示器的白平衡是相当冷的。然而，如果在设置中把色温设置为尽可能的暖色，显示效果就相当自然，特别是考虑到这个价格范围，真的很好。然而，黑色水平可以更好一点，但对于强大的对比度来说还是足够的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 607 cd/m²
Contrast: 1167:1 (Black: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Oppo A16s LCD, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy M12 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Realme 7i IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 0% | -17% | -4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 39.6 ? 17% | 44 ? 8% | 40 ? 17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 28 ? -17% | 34 ? -42% | 30 ? -25% |
| PWM Frequency | 926 ? | |||
| Screen | 32% | -38% | -60% | |
| Brightness middle | 607 | 427 -30% | 426 -30% | 597 -2% |
| Brightness | 586 | 404 -31% | 428 -27% | 569 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 89 -1% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.52 | 0.17 67% | 0.46 12% | 0.74 -42% |
| Contrast | 1167 | 2512 115% | 926 -21% | 807 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 1.5 52% | 4.89 -58% | 5.47 -76% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.7 | 2.1 69% | 9.42 -41% | 12.11 -81% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.6 20% | 4.8 -140% | 6.9 -245% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.3 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.363 93% |
| CCT | 6806 96% | 6652 98% | 7669 85% | 8091 80% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
26% | -28% /
-34% | -32% /
-49% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命
Oppo A16s可以依靠一个 联发科Helio G35有4GB的工作内存。集成的 集成的PowerVR GE8320负责。该处理器提供了一个吸引人的日常性能，但不时可以看到小的停顿。其性能可与 Exynos 850但G35的旧GPU是一个真正的游戏乐趣杀手。作为回报，Oppo智能手机始终保持着令人愉快的冷却。
下巴一侧的扬声器提供了相当好的声音输出，虽然高音偏重，但特别是在中等音量范围内可以说服人。音频插孔通过电缆实现了体面的声音（信噪比：66.43 dBFS）。蓝牙与所有常见的音频编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+和LDAC）可作为一种选择。
A16s的5000毫安时电池确保了极长的屏幕运行时间，因此，在零星使用的情况下，两天的使用应该是很容易的。
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A16s | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G35 (5208 - 5581, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | |
| Realme 7i | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G35 (5279 - 5594, n=2) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A16s | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
| Realme 7i | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G35 (7.4 - 8.1, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A16s | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
| Realme 7i | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G35 (4.1 - 4.2, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A16s | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
| Realme 7i | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G35 (4.7 - 5, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo A16s | |
| Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M12 | |
| Realme 7i | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G35 (1.4 - 1.5, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A16s | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy M12 | Realme 7i | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 273% | 79% | 61% | 6% | 654% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 289.2 | 954 230% | 311.4 8% | 316.4 9% | 274 ? -5% | 1882 ? 551% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 168.4 | 489.1 190% | 249.3 48% | 187.2 11% | 176.6 ? 5% | 1467 ? 771% |
| Random Read 4KB | 45.32 | 155.8 244% | 120.9 167% | 77.4 71% | 59.4 ? 31% | 278 ? 513% |
| Random Write 4KB | 35.23 | 186.1 428% | 67.2 91% | 89.5 154% | 32.2 ? -9% | 310 ? 780% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Oppo A16s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Oppo A16s 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M12 5000 mAh | Realme 7i 6000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 1053 | 1025 -3% | 926 -12% | 1307 24% | 991 ? -6% |
Pros
Cons
结论--Oppo A16的小加号
奥普A16s是一款成功的入门级智能手机，主要以明亮的无PWM显示屏、成熟的双SIM卡和非常长的电池运行时间来说服人们。它也是同类手机中为数不多的配备了NFC芯片的手机之一，它不仅能实现蓝牙设备的快速配对，还能实现移动支付。
尽管价格低廉，但Oppo A16s有很多优点。
唯一遗憾的是，Oppo没有DRM认证。那些还喜欢在智能手机上玩游戏的人将不得不习惯A16s的细节减少和加载时间长。相机当然不是一个亮点，但对于偶尔的快照来说还是足够的。
一个强有力的选择是 Poco M3 Pro 5G，除了5G，它还拥有更高分辨率的90赫兹显示屏，但它更暗。该 Galaxy M12另一方面，它提供了更好的摄像头，但不得不在电池运行时间和Wi-Fi速度方面做出让步。
价格和可用性
Oppo A16s的建议零售价为179欧元（约207美元），但已经可以以低于150欧元（约173美元）的价格买到。除其他外，它可以在Amazon(DE),MediaMarkt(A16不带NFC)或Saturn但也可以在Sparhandy购买，无论有无合同。.
Oppo A16s
- 10/26/2021 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
